A Super Bowl Koan: Does The NFL Wish It Were A Tech Company? (siliconvalley.com)
Are tech companies cashing in on the popularity of Super Bowl -- or is the Super Bowl trying to get into the world of tech? An anonymous reader writes:
The NFL hosted a startup pitch competition before the game. And they also ran tech-themed "future of football" ads during the game which showcased the robot tackling dummies that provide moving targets for training players. Lady Gaga's halftime show is even expected to feature hundreds of drones.
But Microsoft was also hovering around outside the stadium, pushing the concept of "social autographs" (digital signatures drawn onto images) with their Surface tablets. Intel ran ads during the game touting their 360-degree replay technology. Besides the usual game-day ads for beer, there were also several for videogames -- Arnold Schwarzenegger endorsed Mobile Strike, and a reality TV show parody suddenly turned into an ad for World of Tanks. So is technology subtly changing the culture of the Super Bowl -- or is the Super Bowl turning into a massive pageant of technology?
Are any Slashdot readers even watching the Super Bowl? All I know is the Bay Area Newsgroup reported that a Silicon Valley engineer ultimately earns more over their lifetime than the average NFL football player.
But Microsoft was also hovering around outside the stadium, pushing the concept of "social autographs" (digital signatures drawn onto images) with their Surface tablets. Intel ran ads during the game touting their 360-degree replay technology. Besides the usual game-day ads for beer, there were also several for videogames -- Arnold Schwarzenegger endorsed Mobile Strike, and a reality TV show parody suddenly turned into an ad for World of Tanks. So is technology subtly changing the culture of the Super Bowl -- or is the Super Bowl turning into a massive pageant of technology?
Are any Slashdot readers even watching the Super Bowl? All I know is the Bay Area Newsgroup reported that a Silicon Valley engineer ultimately earns more over their lifetime than the average NFL football player.
I know it's photoshopped, but is it a genuine photoshop? And how much is it worth?
Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
Hates women and hates gays. Get your fucking yarn elsewhere.
so is the super bowl
That is all.
Arnold Schwarzenegger insinuating WOT is free
Sprint insinuating Verizon still has contracts
http://jesus-is-savior.com/Fal...
There is a new book that witches around the world are drooling over. It's title is Witchcraft Out of the Shadows, and it's Author is Leo Ruickbie. The website is www.witchcraftoutoftheshadows.com. In a dark time of apostasy around the world, witchcraft is sadly rearing it's ugly head like never before. With Harry Potter, Sabrina the Witch, the Witches TV series, the Church of Satan, and so many other godless influences on our young people, it's to no surprise that the Devil is gaining ground quickly. Let may say right from the beginning... WITCHCRAFT OF ALL FORMS IS SATANIC! The witches and Wiccans can deny it all they want, but the Bible is the FINAL AUTHORITY, not the witches. The Word of God is eternal, It never changes because God never changes...
"For I am the LORD, I change not..." â"Malachi 3:6
God says in His Word that WITCHCRAFT IS A SIN...
"For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft..." â"1st Samuel 15:23
The same God that condemned witchcraft in the Old Testament still condemns witchcraft today. God loves all people (including witches), but he hates sin. Psalm 97:10 challenges ALL Christians to HATE SIN...
"Ye that love the LORD, hate evil..." â"Psalm 97:10
I hate witchcraft, but I love all people. It is WRONG to hate people. I don't hate anyone, despite what my enemies would like to believe. I DO hate sin because God has commanded me to hate sin. ALL believers should hate sin. I love Jesus Christ and am faithfully obeying the Bible by exposing witchcraft. Wicca is black witchcraft. ALL witchcraft is black because there is no such thing as "white sin." To claim that there is "white witchcraft" is to claim that there is "white sin." There is NO such thing as a little "white lie," all lying is as dark as the blackness of hell. ALL sin is black, dark and evil. I am just addressing the witches on their own terms, since they like to differentiate between "white" and "black" witchcraft. If that is the case, then ALL witchcraft is very black, evil through and through.
There is a frightening trend amongst witches to attempt to repackage (to redefine) their history. This new book, Witchcraft Out of the Shadows, attempts to do just that. Leo Ruickbie tries to discredit Christianity and the Bible with his flawed reasonings. He tries to explain "where witchcraft came from?," and "where it is going?" I have a one word answer for the curious reader for both question: HELL
Ruickbie claims to have done an "in-depth" investigation into history to survey the dark-side of the human psyche and it's bias against witchcraft over the centuries. He goes on to claim that many of today's modern negative ideas concerning witchcraft originate in ancient myths and religions. In short, Ruickbie is saying that the Bible is flawed having it's origins in ancient myths. The entire premise of the modern day witchcraft movement is that the Bible is NOT God's Word. Of course, they are 100% WRONG! The Bible is God's eternal, inspired, infallible, inerrant, preserved Word. As you can clearly see, there is NO common ground between Christians and witches. Christians believe that the Bible is God's inspired Word, and the witches denounce it as myths and superstitions.
What does the Bible say? The first mention of the word "witch" in the Bible was made by Moses in Exodus 22:18. God had instructed Moses to impose the death penalty for anyone proven guilty of committing the sin of witchcraft. Wow! For a sin to be punishable by death, it must have been pretty serious to God. Notice again the Scripture I quoted to you earlier from 1st Samuel 15:23, "For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft..." Witchcraft is equal to rebellion! Witchcraft is rebellion against God. The Bible condemns witches and witchcraft, I don't have to.
"And he caused his children to pass through
Is it even necessary anymore?
I was thinking more like "impossible to print or save as a jpeg" from the locked-down Surface app, but "You can order prints starting at $4.99 (PS filters and effects available for a small extra fee)!"
The teams and the league are there to make money. As such they'll apply whatever trappings they think will bring more fans and thus more money to the sport.
Right now tech is hot, tech is popular. It doesn't matter why it's hot or popular, if they can find a way to cobble it in for greater profit then they will do so. The game itself has not changed significantly for a very long time, the only tech required has been safety equipment to attempt to reduce injuries.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
All this says is social media is even more overvalued than professional sport. That's not a good thing, you shallow greedy fools.
All I know is the Bay Area Newsgroup reported that a Silicon Valley engineer ultimately earns more over their lifetime than the average NFL football player.
Reminds me of an article comparing a doctor's lifetime earnings vs a UPS driver. In the analysis, the doctor doesn't pull ahead until about 18 years after high school, due to the long period of schooling and residency, plus debt load.
http://www.er-doctor.com/docto...
I was in the USA once when one of these Superbowl things was on so can tell you a wee bit about it. I think it is meant to be the top level of the sport but appears to be only USA based teams. They call the sport football but it is not in any way related to actual football. It appears to be safety focused version of rugby where they are wearing full body armor making the players look more like some mini-mecha from an anime. Not as entertaining as my description might lead you to believe, but this is compensated for by a live concert in the middle of the game and some quite watchable commercials.
I WONDERED how they did that opener for the halftime show. I was wondering if I was seeing on-the-fly computer graphics. Drones makes sense.
Super Bowl brought to you by........baseball (MLBAM). http://www.sportsvideo.org/201...
I don't give a shit about football (either American, or soccer)
and WTF is a koan?
The tech companies get a high visibility test client for IoT and related data-analytics products and services. The NFL gets cheap business consulting and technology solutions to support what ever comes out of it. The NFL customers get flashier shows and more involved fan-products. It's a win-win-win.
Bitch Trump's team is being grabbed by the pussy. Go Falcons!!!!
no, there will never be any kind of tech-football marriage
Early in the fourth - all is right in the world.
But back on topic: Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLB-AM) has been extremely successful - that probably has the NFL drooling.
#DeleteChrome
This is the stupidest thing I've seen on the Internet since 4pm.
The average career length of an NFL player is 3.3 years. The average career length of a Silicon Valley engineer will probably be closer to 40 years. Longer if they "reform" Social Security and add years to the retirement age.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Talk about fluffing your numbers.
For the average NFL player, it’s $3 million and for pro hoops players it’s $12 million. Average pro athlete careers range from 3.5 years to 5.6 years.
An engineer’s lifetime earnings potential exceeds $5 million. That’s from working 40 years at an average of $125,418 annually
So you have the possibility to earn 3-12 million for five years work, as compared to 5-13 million for 40 years work. Possiblities are not guarentees. This is finding people with high enough negotiated wages to support your arguement.
Both fields have a limited amount of positions paying the highest amount.
$125,418 per year works out to about $2250 a week. I doubt that salary is going to people fresh out of school. I would quite like to be paid that, and not have to pay student loans to boot.
Game is now in overtime. How will the Patriots cheat their way to a win?
A high rate of attrition is bad for building up talented sports players. American Football is safe enough for the average player to survive high school, college, and 5 to 13 years in the NFL. Now, their brains, or bodies, might be useless after that, but, it doesn't effect gameplay quality.
Back before it was considered an evil cost center, tech was once used as a tool and process engineering. You need internet, email, spreadsheets, databases, business intelligence, statistics, social media marketing, etc.
The newer companies GET IT. You want to sell more product? Don't do silly commercials. Go to facebook, twitter, and use analytics from these to find out what your customers want and to support fan driven sites. That is just one example.
The NFL gets it! THe dying companies do not and are reactive and view IT as plumbing and only spend money AFTER something fails.
http://saveie6.com/
Well, obviously Russia got involved.
(I kid, I kid...)
#DeleteChrome
A Silicon Valley engineer? Which engineer ultimately earns more over their lifetime than the average NFL football player? Slashdot's editors need to go the way to the IMDb message board.
Superbowl? Only if you enjoy watching subhuman freaks pumped up on steroids.
I sometimes watch the superbowl advertisements, but I can't honestly imagine ever being interested in watching a bunch of sweaty guys in spandex hugging on each other and trying to get each other on the ground. There are many websites for this and frankly, I'm glad people into that sort of thing have a place to watch it, but I'd far prefer to sit at a coffee shop and look at the pretty girls as they go by.
As for cheerleaders... holy shit... they all look like rednecks attacked by botox on hair spray.
I think that the Greeks and Romans had the right idea when they created organized sports to keep the stupid people preoccupied with something meaningless.
About a week ago I read something about the Super Bowl's "opening night" and I wondered if it was a football championship or a Broadway musical.
How can a football game have an "opening night"?
No doubt it was a big show, but as another poster points out there was only 11 minutes of playing time. Is that true? And the hype about the commercials and the half-time show is possibly even bigger than the action on the field.
I guess the NFL has done some cool things with technology....well, not the NFL but people who partnered with them (e.g. CMU experts helping CBS's 30 robotic cameras to work as one)
It looks like Intel has taken that a few steps further for this year's Super Bowl. I would hope anyway. That was 16 years ago.
But on other tech fronts, wasn't there an article in the last year on /. about the NFL's horrible experiences with their Surfaces? And didn't announcers keep referring to them as iPads?
And dammit, I just watched a brief news clip about the Super Bowl hoping to see some of this amazing new camera technology and the only pictures of the game were still images! I should have known better than to click on a Newsy link. CBS doesn't play well with whatever extensions I have on Chrome and Firefox so I had to pull up IE to watch their report...and watch a Bud Light commercial...And CBS didn't have anything but still images in their news clip either? WTF?
Didn't the game air on CBS? Was the camera technology cool? It seems they're making it difficult to see.
Hoping the future brings us closer to Blood Bowl.
Tech is more popular yes. But that doesn't mean technical workers are any less in demand, because even if more people were actually drawn to tech work than before (are there?) the ones who just do it for the glory either make it hardly past the rigors of learning programming, or if they do perform so poorly on the job that all people who really enjoy technical work look like giants by comparison.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
But the moment I began seeing advertisments of African-Americans promoting Civil Rights Extremism, OFF went the TV. Who the hell can stand to watch that shit?
A haiku is not a poem based on syllables. Karma is not what goes around comes around. And a koan is not a RANDOM FUCKING QUESTION.
The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
When the president himself is running around repeating pro-nazi slogans, maybe we ought to take it seriously.
Atlanta would have won if all those illegals hadn't voted for the patriots.
I'm sure NFL won't be same with them!
Yes, the Patriots won again....
I didn't think the NFL's TV ratings were so bad this season that they had to show a repeat of a Super Bowl just to get people to watch.
And then there was FOX....
I thought I had tuned into watch a Super Bowl, but all I got was an apparent endless stream of commercials. Was a game even played?
Frankly, I don't know what would be more interesting this past Sunday evening, watching this so-called football game or being forced to watch CNN or MSNBC for 4 hours.
I have to comment on the "engineer makes more than an NFL player" claim.
The page in the link shows that an engineer makes more in 40 years than the NFL player makes in 3.5 years. But this ignores the all-critical time aspect.
In reality, if the NFL player made $3 million in 3.5 years while the engineer made $5 million in 40 years, the NFL player would come out WAY ahead. Historically, the stock market has been giving a 7% return on investment annually.
So let's take that $3 million and compound it for the next 35 years to see how it will compare to the engineer who earned $5 million in 40 years:
If the NFL player blew every last penny of interest each year he'd be pulling in over $200k from the interest alone. But if he didn't touch the money and let it compound over those next 36.5 years, he'd have over $34 million. And this is assuming that the NFL player didn't get any job after that to generate additional income.
To make matters worse for the engineer he has to live in the most expensive real estate market in the US to work in the silicon valley area. The retired NFL player could live wherever he wanted, including places where housing is cheap (no need to live in an expensive town if you don't need to make money).