Slashdot Mirror


Intel To Invest $7 Billion in Factory in Arizona, Employ 3,000 People (cnbc.com)

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich met with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, where the company announced it will invest $7 billion in a factory employing up to 3,000 people. From a report: The factory will be in Chandler, Arizona, the company said, and over 10,000 people in the Arizona area will support the factory. Krzanich confirmed to CNBC that the investment over the next three to four years would be to complete a previous plant, Fab 42, that was started and then left vacant. The 7-nanometer chips will be produced there will be "the most powerful computer chips on the planet," Krzanich said in the Oval Office with the Trump administration. Most Intel manufacturing happens in the U.S., Krzanich said. "America has a unique combination of talent, a vibrant business environment and access to global markets, which has enabled U.S. companies like Intel to foster economic growth and innovation," Krzanich said in a statement. "Our factories support jobs -- high-wage, high-tech manufacturing jobs that are the economic engines of the states where they are located."Farhad Manjoo, columnist at The New York Times, tweeted; "As far as I can tell the decision had nothing to do with Trump, but they decided to announce with Trump. Why? There was no federal subsidy or any other credit. So it's just a marketing decision to give Trump credit."

217 comments

  1. Uhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't most Intel fab work happen in the US because they legally can't export the more advanced processes?

    1. Re: Uhhhh... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      No. Any further questions?

    2. Re: Uhhhh... by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      yes it happens in the US by ppl from india that live in the US.

    3. Re:Uhhhh... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Probably not. They've sold plenty of Xeons made in places like Costa Rica.

    4. Re: Uhhhh... by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      i "used" to work for intel in riverton utah. all i did was their help desk for a mere $25hr, hey, i needed the work and it got me away from wife at home ..all we did was take in state calls from fabs that come from india. at 21 years of age w/ their masters, they are not here to play games.

    5. Re: Uhhhh... by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No...

      But also don't forget that up to means that 3000 laborers will work on construction, followed by a hundred or so people running the actual fab.

      Still.. The tax breaks are the same either way.. so it's all good (for Intel).

      Pretty much the same for all these big announcements.. the central feature of them is reporting the size of facility construction crews and quietly ignoring the face that they are highly automated production requiring just a handful of long term staff.

      No large business does labor intensive work in the us.. the tax breaks are just not enough, and god forbid they don't maximise profits at the cost of jobs and long term skills development.. That would be un American!

    6. Re: Uhhhh... by jandersen · · Score: 1

      But also don't forget that up to means that 3000 laborers will work on construction, followed by a hundred or so people running the actual fab.

      In fact, 'up to' means exactly the same as 'less than or equal to'. When somebody promises that you can get 'up to X', it means nothing - 0 is less than whatever X is, so I can promise to pay you 'up to $10 million' for a pack of chewing gum, even if I'm never going to pay more than $.1 for it.

  2. MAGA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Trump wins again!

    1. Re: MAGA! by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      of course trump wins 75% of Americans voted for him.

    2. Re: MAGA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's fake news, it's 89.4%

    3. Re: MAGA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea! MAGMA! Or wharever.

      I wonder how much of this is directly related to the Aug 2016 announcement that Intel will slash 12,000 positions as part of a restructuring effort in late 2016 to early 2017:

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/intel-to-cut-12-000-jobs-1461097009

      I also wonder how many of the 10,000 positions outside "high tech" positions are temporary contract construction related positions that will disappear in 1-2 years? I wonder what portion of those numbers also include regular turnover.

  3. From Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To Trump:

    Please give us government money.

    1. Re:From Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this has more to do with monopoly allegations.

    2. Re:From Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There was no federal subsidy or any other credit."

      You couldn't even make it to the end, not of the article, but of the /. post.

      W E W

  4. As far as a journalist can tell? by mveloso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Journalists are idiots, who only know what they're told.

    Why would Intel be sharing its CapEx decision-making process with a journalist?

    If the Journalist really knew, he'd go back through his "notes" and find the list of where Intel's proposed fab was going to be, then hunt down the decision-making process.

    But he can't, so he basically is saying "I don't believe them because I have no information."

    What an f-tard.

    1. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by epiphani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You'll note there's nothing to not believe. The journalist was simply pointing out that there is no apparent reason for this announcement to come from Intel's CEO while he's in the Oval Office. Nothing in the announcement, brief, or subsequent details suggests this has anything at all to do with Trump. Except the location of the announcement.

      H's just confused about why it took place in the Oval Office. There's two possible reasons really:

      (1) Trump did something to prompt this decision. In which case, I would expect, based on Trump's personality, that he'd be telling everyone who will listen how he did it.
      (2) Trump didn't do anything except arrange for the announcement to come from inside the Oval. I personally think this is the case - it gives people (like you) that want to believe he's doing something a talking point, valid or not - and two, it gives Intel the perception of being both pro-trump and meh-trump at the same time.

      The short version here is that we're being fed something. I hesitate to call it bullshit, because nobody said anything weird - but it certainly looks like people are trying to play some kind of game here.

      --
      .
    2. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Journalists are idiots, who only know what they're told.

      Why would Intel be sharing its CapEx decision-making process with a journalist?

      If the Journalist really knew, he'd go back through his "notes" and find the list of where Intel's proposed fab was going to be, then hunt down the decision-making process.

      But he can't, so he basically is saying "I don't believe them because I have no information."

      What an f-tard.

      The past few months has been a steady line of CEOs coming to Trump to re-announce existing job creations, things that most definitely had nothing to do with Trump. But since Trump is a crony capitalist they recognize it's important to buy favour with Trump by giving him credit.

      The default assumption for any new job announcement credited to Trump should be that it's more of the same, jobs created for other reasons but credited to the President to curry favour.

      Unless there's evidence to the contrary there's sufficient information to assume this has nothing to do with Trump.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about the ratings and click bait. Trump loves ratings but so does the media.
      Tabloid journalism is what has become of them all.

    4. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Building multi-billion-dollar fabs in Arizona is not something new for Intel; it's a favorite site of theirs for whatever reasons (probably real estate costs, availability of qualified workers, cheap electric power, lack of bad weather and natural disasters, etc.). They would have built this fab there anyway.

    5. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The short version here is that we're being fed something. I hesitate to call it bullshit, because nobody said anything weird - but it certainly looks like people are trying to play some kind of game here.

      Yes, this is PR, and Trump has said that one of the jobs of President is "chief cheerleader." So if you make jobs in the country, Trump is going to give you an bouquet. If you make jobs leave the country, he's going to give you a brickbat. Whether the decisions had anything to do with him or not are irrelevant.

      Economies are self-fulfilling prophecies. If people believe the economy is going to get better, they go out and spend money. This makes the economy better. If people believe the economy is going to get worse, they stop spending money. This makes the economy worse.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    6. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trump is a cheerleader for economic growth. If you make jobs, he's going to give you good publicity. If you make jobs leave, he's going to give you bad publicity. This encourages companies to do business in the US, which grows the economy. Doesn't matter if it had anything to do with Trump's policies or not.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by zaft · · Score: 2

      Read down in the article. The building was actually completed as a shell in 2014. So there would be plenty of reasons to finish it (buying equipment is hella expensive) and very little incentive to abandon it and move elsewhere.

    8. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But since Trump is a crony capitalist the

      You are a crony Communist.

    9. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      This encourages companies to do business in the US, which grows the economy.

      No it isn't, don't be such a fucktard.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      Fucktard? If that's the best comment you have then simply don't post.

    11. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The reason, security. The only way for governments to maintain secure computer systems is to have them fully fabricated within the country, every single part, with random audits and inspections at manufacturing centres, basically there is no other way to do it. Trusting another country with your computer infrastructure is basically handing over control of your countries computer infrastructure to that other country, a really unwise decision. The US government has flat out fully proven it can not be trusted with this, not by enemies and most certainly not be allies. Is the US especially bad, no, basically no country can be trusted in this regard and only idiots would allow it to occur. Countries who are incapable of producing their own, end up being digitally owned by the countries they rely on to do it for them. A crack down in the US was inevitable, not made locally, does not enter government service will be the long term outcome and that tied to security, a logical sound decision, it's just the way it is.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Who did and made you king, lardass?

      If you're so smart tell me why international trade happened in the first place and send me a postcard from Stockholm.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      This encourages companies to do business in the US, which grows the economy.

      Some questions to ponder for you and the DeVry droputs who modded you up:

      1) If that was the case every country in the world would put up infinite tariffs and they'd all be better off. Why haven't they done this? Is it because it never occurred to them because they're not as smart as Trump?

      2) Stepping back a level, why did international trade even start in the first place?

      3) Have you heard of David Ricardo?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by radl33t · · Score: 1

      I like it better when liberals pick winners, but all is well as long as we destroy democracy and blur the lines between government and business.

    15. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Rocket Science, this is because of Trump's planned Trade and Tax restructuring.

      He's making it cost effective to do this type of thing in the US versus exporting all the jobs & Manufacturing.

      I don't understand how people can't figure this out - I guess they just don't want to and would prefer to B&M,

    16. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The short version here is that we're being fed something. I hesitate to call it bullshit, because nobody said anything weird - but it certainly looks like people are trying to play some kind of game here.

      We do have a word for that: marketing. This here is a big steaming pile of it.

    17. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      blur the lines between government and business.

      That line was wiped out a long, long time ago, friend.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    18. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      every country in the world would put up infinite tariffs

      The extreme absolute is a good tell for cognitive dissonance. "If shoplifting is bad, why doesn't every store in the world brutally torture and publicly execute every shoplifter?"

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    19. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, you are the one who is the fucktard.

      I won the argument! On the internet!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    20. Re:As far as a journalist can tell? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A handwaving bullshit answer to one question out of three. Bravo, ask your mom for a cookie or twelve.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does Farhad Manjoo actually read the rest of the NY Times?

    Wake up NY Times and start acting like a real fourth estate.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/trump-intel-chip-factory-arizona.html?_r=0

    "The factory, which will complement two other factories that Intel has in Chandler, Ariz., has been under consideration for several years. But Mr. Krzanich said that the tax cuts and deregulatory policies pushed by Mr. Trump had prompted the company to move forward with its plans."

  6. "the most powerful computer chips on the planet" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does that mean they'll be 0.002% faster than the last generation of chips? I knew Intel's chips weren't improving at any great pace, but even I was surprised when I saw HardOCPs benchmarks comparing a five generation old Sandy Bridge 2600K to the latest Kaby Lake 7700K:

    http://www.hardocp.com/article/2017/01/13/kaby_lake_7700k_vs_sandy_bridge_2600k_ipc_review/2

    I'm not feeling any need to upgrade my i7 3770, and if I did I'd probably go for a Ryzen since the market desperately needs some competition.

    If Ryzen turns out to be good Intel will no doubt just bribe all the OEMs to use their chips, just like they did when AMD got well ahead of them with the Athlon.

  7. BK is doing the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Intel always builds its new fabs in chandler - so this really ISN'T news. What would be news would be if Intel were for some reason to break with this and not invest in chandler first.

    Considering how Trump trashed Boeing's share price - is it any wondering BK and the Intel board are giving the vainglorious moron the chance to bask in Intel's reflected glory ?

    This is the definition of a propaganda piece - roughly akin to when Kim Jong Un 'directs' nuclear tests or 'gives guidance' to actual surgeons in hospitals...

    1. Re:BK is doing the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG a politician doing a photo op NEVER seen that before....

    2. Re:BK is doing the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it builds the new lines first in Hillsboro, OR. (D1X, etc).

      Then it tries to replicate them elsewhere.

    3. Re:BK is doing the right thing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      One set are prototype fabs, the other are production.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know you're trying to do yet more painting of Trump in a bad light by spreading "fake news" and "alternative facts", but if you'd bothered to keep up you'd know that two Republican senators voted no on Devos leaving a tie which had to be broken by Pence.

  9. He's making it up as he goes along! by martinX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "As far as I can tell" = I have know information, no source and don't know anything about the industry, but I'll make something up anyway.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:He's making it up as he goes along! by Troy+Roberts · · Score: 1
      So, he has an opinion that he gave on his twitter feed. So, fucking what?
      Do you think that Trump somehow made a deal? The only information the article has is:

      It comes as the technology industry has pushed back against the Trump administration, amid mounting pressure to move manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. There will be no incentives from the federal government for the Intel project, the White House said.

      Intel has a number of semiconductor fabrication plants in the US. In fact, they have 4 in Chandler, AZ. So, I think it is a good bet the Trump had little or nothing to do with the decision, but Intel is taking advantage of the politics.

    2. Re:He's making it up as he goes along! by martinX · · Score: 1

      No idea if Trump made a deal. That's kind of my point. The twitterer is a journalist so he could at least use some of his journalistic superpowers to find a bit more out. Turns out this is a recycled deal that Intel has trotted out before. Would take a real journalist seconds to check this.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  10. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repug

    What are you, 12?

  11. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol you tipping.

  12. Weak sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'd rather have a Nobel peace prize

  13. Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Intel run by a bunch of inbred idiots?

    Why build manufacturing facilities where there's water shortages, problems with tectonic plate shifts, steep power bills for air-conditioning...

    If it had been me, those 3 strikes would have ruled out the entire south-west of the U.S. for anything I'd want to build.
    Add in the east coast with hurricanes, rising sea-levels due to polar ice melt-off, overcrowding and the entire eastern-coast is off limits for building.
    That leaves the mid to upper midwest as the sweet-spot for construction.
    Milder weather, easy water access, easy renewable power access, no earth-quakes, no hurricanes, no overcrowding, no issues with rising sea-level, cheaper land costs, workers with better moral and work ethics, multiple easy-access transportation hubs for getting parts in and out...

    Wonder who's pocket was stuffed with graft after signing the deal.

  14. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It had to have cost a fortune.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  15. Re:Trump scare maybe by martinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You heard something about someone, so from that you extrapolate that the Intel chief is scared of Trump and so will commit $7 billion to avoid Trump saying something mean about him on Twitter.

    Dumbest thing I've read today, but it's early.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  16. The same plant they touted with Obama in 2011? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's neat!

  17. Re:Trump scare maybe by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Two "moderate" Republicans voted against Devos that tied the vote (50-50) in the Senate and Vice President Pence cast the tie breaking vote in favor of the Republicans. These "moderates" only announced their opposition after it became obvious that nomination vote would succeed without them. Not a tweet out of Trump.

  18. I guess they can bulldoze over the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    big "Thanks Obama" sign we stomped into grounds there...

  19. Re:Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Um, they aren't exactly using tap water here, genius. It's ultrapure water, and it's used in a closed cycle.

  20. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He's an H1-B apologist.

    His column in the Times today was explaining how much Silicon Valley needs immigrants for their hard work, inspiration and outside-the-box thinking.

    Which is just fine -- but really, the complaint isn't about too much innovation in the Valley, the complaint is about run of the mill non-innovator jobs being outsourced to H1-Bs in the name of corporate profits.

    Of course he didn't mention that issue at all, choosing to cast the issue as predominantly one of racism and ignorance killing the innovation hub of America.

  21. Thanks President Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep the muslims out!

  22. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The funny thing about the NY Times is that their editorial board endorsed Hillary, but their anti-Hillary reporters kept the email and FBI stories alive for months until the election.

  23. Re:"the most powerful computer chips on the planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think Intel is genuinely on alert with respect to AMD. Intel's recent actions have led me believe that the Ryzen really is a very good CPU. Have you noticed in the last six weeks or so that Intel has been hammering the airwaves with ads? Not since the days of "Intel Inside" have I seen so much hype. These advertisements feature a Pee Wee Herman type guy walking around some business district yacking about how Intel powers all the self driving cars, Intel powers the cloud, etc. etc. It's without substance. It's all rah rah hype --- "Hooray for Intel".

    Intel is clearly trying to reestablish their brand, and would not waste money on these ads if AMD wasn't about to unleash some serious competition.

  24. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CTR? They're gone now. It's ShareBlue now.

  25. Re:Trump scare maybe by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Speculation is all we have to go on. Maybe there were sneaky backroom deals made, or perhaps it's just one executives strange 'seemed like a good idea at the time,' or perhaps just an attempt to curry favor with those in power right now. Who knows? I don't.

  26. Because... by LetterRip · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trump is an extremely vindictive and extremely vain man - if you stroke his vanity then he will likely provide benefit (influence government contracts; direct regulators to do favorable actions) and if he feels he has been slighted he will be highly vindictive.

    So giving him credit plays into his vanity.

    1. Re:Because... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Well it does kind of work in a way, every business that has a few jobs to keep in USA will show up at his door; "See, this is for you!"

      It will create the impression that his influence is working. The number of jobs be damned.

      But 2017 will of course be an economic boom year, and we can thank Trump for that.

      2018 however, the economy will tank, and we can blame Obama for that.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    2. Re:Because... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      2018 however, the economy will tank, and we can blame Obama for that.

      Does this mean we've officially ended the last eight years where we blamed Bush for everything?

  27. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting how credibility is gone when they don't completely criticize a candidate you don't like, but you don't seem to feel the same for all of the others who were blatantly giving a leg up to Clinton?

  28. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody care what some partisan hack from the NYTimes says? They have no credibility left, spent it all trying to get the bitch elected.

    No kidding. The qualifier of "As far as (Farhad Manjoo) can tell" is as far as you have to read.

  29. America is a disaster... by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm confused. Trump says that American is a broken, dangerous disaster, but the CEO of Intel says, "America has a unique combination of talent, a vibrant business environment and access to global markets, which has enabled U.S. companies like Intel to foster economic growth and innovation". Which is it? Is American a horrible, horrible place where billionaire's daughters are treated "unfairly", or is it an awesome place where Intel can be formed and grow?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:America is a disaster... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Trump voters believe that the USA is a massive clusterfuck. People who deal with the real world knows that's not true.

    2. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump voters believe that the US government is a massive clusterfuck. People who deal with the real world knows that's very true.

      FTFY
      HTH
      HAND

    3. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No people believe government is a massive clusterfuck.

    4. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then libs hold the record for consistently using the world's largest paintbrush.

    5. Re:America is a disaster... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      then libs hold the record for consistently using the world's largest paintbrush.

      I'm a moderate conservative. I don't need a broad paintbrush.

    6. Re: America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet the same politicians continue to be elected...

    7. Re:America is a disaster... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have all of the alternative facts.

    8. Re:America is a disaster... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Trump voters believe that the US government is a massive clusterfuck. People who deal with the real world knows that's very true.

      Will be once Trump gets done running the government into the ground.

    9. Re:America is a disaster... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have all of the alternative facts.

      I just make it up as I go along. If it works for Trump, it should work for me.

    10. Re:America is a disaster... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hm, as a non american I think you have it somehow reversed.

      The USA *are* a massive cluster fuck and Trump voters think it is not.

      But that is just me, seeing your comment on "alternative facts" below ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said the person while painting a nebulous group as all representing a single ideology.

    12. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will be once Trump gets done running the government into the ground.

      Yes, yes, of course, since the US government was functioning SO well up until now...[eye-roll]

      Seriously, do you even read what you type and think about it, other than correcting spelling and grammar, before clicking 'Submit'?

      *NOT* being a central command & control style society, government, and economy is *precisely* the reason why the US went from 13 former mostly-agrarian British colonies to a 'superpower' with the most personal freedom and highest standard of living of any nation ever in the entire history of humankind and landing a man on the moon, all in just around 200 years when most nations of the past at 200 years after their founding were typically just finding their stride and their place among other nations.

      I shudder to think of what the world might be like today if there had never been a USA.

    13. Re:America is a disaster... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, of course, since the US government was functioning SO well up until now...[eye-roll]

      The Alt-Right had a website that portrayed California as being a racist hell hole where everyone lived in ghettos, armed to the teeth and ready to kill each other at the slightest provocation. If you drilled down into the details of these comments, most observations were made by white people who lived in California during the 1980's, currently live in outside of California and have no clue about social conditions in California today. I thought it was a satire website until several Slashdotters insisted that the website was true and I was lying to cover up for the failed California socialist utopia. What a load of bullshit!

      Seriously, do you even read what you type and think about it, other than correcting spelling and grammar, before clicking 'Submit'?

      Slashdot exists to keep me amused while I'm waiting for a script to finish at work. In short, I don't take it seriously and no one should take my comments seriously.

      I shudder to think of what the world might be like today if there had never been a USA.

      According to a science fiction story that I've read in an old issue of Analog Magazine, Native Americans would have colonized Europe and wonder what the world be like if the savage Europeans had colonized the Americas first.

    14. Re:America is a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump voters believe that the USA is a massive clusterfuck. People who deal with the real world knows that's not true.

      Many of them believe that the affordable care act and obamacare are complete different, that Obama is a secret Muslim Kenyan dictator that leads from behind and wears mom pants, that the terrorists are really our most serious threat, that Trumps ban is going to be useful, other than for those like ISIS, that the wall will keep out the criminals just as soon as we ban ladders, that we are getting coal jobs back, etc, etc...

      That elections are often decided based on persuading those kind of voters makes me weep in shame for our country.

    15. Re:America is a disaster... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Trump voters think there are levers under the Oval Office desk for security, prosperity and happiness and that Obama didn't pull them out of spite.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  30. taxes, regulations by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell the decision had nothing to do with Trump

    Lower corporate taxes and fewer regulations seem like good incentives, and it's not just Trump but also the GOP Congress that's been around for a while.

    1. Re:taxes, regulations by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The rest of the country can go BOOM! like Texas a few years ago.

      http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/04/27/article-2315751-1981B3C1000005DC-728_634x450.jpg

  31. Re:Trump scare maybe by gatkinso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh bullshit. The checks and balances built into the American political system seem to be working just fine.

    He might do shit that you and I don't - and trust me I really don't like him - but he is not Hitler 2.0 even tho he might want to be, nor will he sell the nation off to the highest bidder.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  32. Re:Trump scare maybe by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Republicans in Congress know that if they don't fall in line with President Bannon, they'll get primaried in their next election.

    Only two Republicans went against Trump on DeVos. Susan Collins has nothing to fear and everything to gain with her vote. She is popular in Maine, and the core of the Maine Republican Party is far more moderate than at the national level. She has far more to fear in the general election against a Democrat. Lisa Mirkowski also has little to fear. DeVos wants to divert more resources toward charters and vouchers, and that does nothing for Alaskans. You can't use a voucher when the closest alternative school is 300 miles across the taiga/tundra.

  33. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "[...] But Mr. Krzanich said that the tax cuts and deregulatory policies pushed by Mr. Trump had prompted the company to move forward with its plans."

    Tax cuts and deregulatory policies that Trump only talked about. No executive order will change or enact these items. The Republicans are too busy arguing among themselves on how to repeal and replace ObamaCare that they don't have time for anything else. We're overdue for a recession. I look forward to buying stocks on the way down.

  34. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by imgod2u · · Score: 1

    While what you're saying is true. There is an actual issue with the current form of H1-B reform. That is to say *all* job positions regardless of talent level must consider "Americans first" in a vague way. That ambiguity is what's troubling and what leads to a lot of potential problems as it's left to the executive branch to enforce and interpret.

    Let's say you have a dire need for data scientists and good ones. POTUS can now have his agencies force you to hire less talented people instead of those more talented from abroad, or ones who are here in the US as students who are seeking jobs.

    So while we do need to address the issue of H1-B farms, the current proposed solution is kludgy, ill-defined, knee-jerk and probably won't have the desired effect...which is kinda inline with all things Trump.

  35. How many H1B workers? by SysEngineer · · Score: 2

    In Hillsboro over 30% of software programmers are guest workers. That is about 5% of the households in the area. With such a high concentration of H1B tech workers, that is increasing housing in the area displacing the retired, disabled and the working poor.

    1. Re:How many H1B workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But companies what cheap labor to increase the bottom iine.

    2. Re:How many H1B workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should focus on yourself, not on circumstances you can't control and are probably lying to everyone (and yourself) about.

    3. Re:How many H1B workers? by SysEngineer · · Score: 1

      If I do not speak up for the disabled, who will?
      With the ideology in the Trump administration, H1B is on the chopping block.
      Do a FOIA from USCIS and you will see the truth.

  36. This is terrible news! by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not sure why it's terrible news, but you know... it makes Trump look good.

    Terrible news!

    1. Re:This is terrible news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The orange one's ego is already larger than the nation... Best not to feed it, lest it grow so large it will try to consume us all.

  37. This won't create real jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the short term this fab will create jobs for those involved in its construction but once it has been built it will be staffed by experienced people from other Intel fabs. Those other fabs may backfill some of those positions but the nodes they produce will be ramping down as this new fab comes online. While it's nice to see these jobs remain in the US it is quite a stretch call them newly created.

  38. Re:Trump scare maybe by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Repug

    What are you, 12?

    This is why we would would prefer discussing technology to politics in this forum.

  39. They Want Export Bans Lifted by Kagato · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The US Gov't blocked Intel from selling their most powerful CPUs to China. Intel would like to roll that back since all it did was get China to create a high power domestic that they can now export to compete with Intel.

    1. Re:They Want Export Bans Lifted by mentil · · Score: 1

      Many of the highest-performing supercomputers (including China's most powerful) run on HPC cards made by video card companies (Nvidia/AMD). Considering the annual gains on performance of GPUs vs CPUs, this makes sense, and the FLOPS comparison makes the decision easy. Besides, Intel's most powerful chips are made in (IIRC) Germany and Malaysia, so I'm unsure how the USA would stop a European subsidiary from selling to China.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:They Want Export Bans Lifted by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Intel has no fabs in either Germany or Malaysia. There is some packaging and test in Malaysia, though.

      If you are thinking of design, the cellular modem group (purchased from Infineon) has a major design center in Munich, and the Penang design center formerly did work on big cores.

  40. Re:Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Power and real estate are cheap in Phoenix and it doesn't have earthquakes. It also lacks the taxes and regulations that have made it impossible to do business in California.

  41. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    She didn't get her pardon. Those stories aren't over yet, despite the media attempts at whitewashing during the election.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. Re:Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, dumb-ass, I doubt that they truck in the water that's used, so probably filtered on site from, yup, you guessed it, the tap.
    But even if they did some-how truck it in, unless it's sourced from some place where there's no shortage of water, I doubt it's helping with the water shortage, and if it is, then it's not helping with green-house gases trucking the water in from somewhere so far away.

    Regardless, you totally failed to consider the human / water side of the equation.
    How much water will the employees drink?
    How much water will the employees use while cooking meals or washing dishes / containers?
    How much water will be used for the toilets?
    How much water will be used for cooling of the facilities?
    How much water will be used for cleaning the facilities?
    How much water will be used for landscaping to make the office "pretty"?

    Gasp! All of that in a place where there already isn't enough water to meet demands.
    Go figure.

  43. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Would it be unreasonable to speculate that the writer is a complete moron who has no clue?

  44. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    What? You are confused. There was no media more in the tank for Hillary than the NYTimes. None that spent their credibility more like drunken sailors, thinking they would get 'first question' for eight years, during which they could rebuild some credibility.

    Done now. They can't unring that bell.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  45. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Attacking a strawman of your own construction, while ignoring the 'highest salaries get the visas' aspect of the changes.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  46. Re:Trump scare maybe by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most likely Intel was going to hire those people regardless of who became President as they need to increase their lines. A public announcement will get Trump off their backs.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  47. Re:Trump scare maybe by naris · · Score: 1

    No, it's more like Intel had decided to spend $7 billion on the fab for business reasons not involving Trump (most likely long before Trump became president, and possibly even before the election) so they decided that, hey -- we should announce it now while we are meeting with Trump so he will be more supportive of us and not use Twitter to tank our stocks!

  48. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The media normalized Donald Trump who wasn't serious about winning the presidency. Now we got a 70-year-old man-child in the White House who is running the government into the ground (that's not a compliment).

  49. Re:Trump scare maybe by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Mostly because they were in states that are blue & more scared for their job than they are from trump.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  50. Intel are continuing to keep jobs in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a new strategy for Intel. Trump can make political capital by highlighting this, while it's great marketing for Intel.

    Although it's good news for US jobs, it will naturally displease Intel and Trumps competitors/enemies.

  51. Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump credited with Intels decision to continue work on AZ fab plant.

  52. Just curious, were you asking this of Tesla? by mpercy · · Score: 1

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/n...

    RENO — The massive Tesla battery factory being built in Northern Nevada will be a thirsty resident, with some preliminary estimates saying it will require the equivalent of nearly half of the groundwater rights allocated to its Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center neighborhood.

    The project, the cherry atop Gov. Brian Sandoval’s economic development agenda to date, promises high-paying jobs and a diversification from a long-sagging gambling economy to one powered by high-tech manufacturing and technology.

    But the $5 billion, 5 million-square-foot facility going up just down the road from Reno-Sparks in Storey County exemplifies the challenges of balancing economic growth with the availability of natural resources needed to sustain it.

    State and local economic development officials say through smart use of technology and recycling the most precious resource — water — the region is up to the task.

    Skeptics, while not opposed to the huge project per se, question whether there’s as much water as projected in the basin along the Truckee River to meet demands without harming the river and downstream users.

  53. Re:Trump scare maybe by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the Flying Spaghetti Monster agreed to detour around the plant if the Intel CEO cozied up to Trump. We just don't know! YOU DECIDE!

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  54. Re:Trump scare maybe by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Or maybe it's that at $2.1/million/job, there isn't so much to be saved going elsewhere.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  55. Re:Trump scare maybe by Ravaldy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know you're trying to do yet more painting of Trump in a bad light by spreading "fake news" and "alternative facts"

    Nobody needs to paint Trump, he does that very well on his own. He literally is the greatest at it.

    Heck, look at how many times he has had to backtrack on what he said previously. If you don't know, then you are just another peasant that's been conned into voting for someone who does not have your best interest at heart.

  56. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Still better than the alternative was.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  57. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you have no proof of your accusations.

  58. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd guess the H1-B visa system will have one of two possible primary biases.

    Primary Bias A: Visas are harder to get, and some "key innovators", really smart people that even most morons would agree should work here, can't get a visa.

    Primary Bias B: Visas are too easy to get, and a lot of run-of-the-mill IT jobs get outsourced, costing people their jobs.

    What's wrong with having Primary Bias A?

    The number of actual key innovators is numerically small and presumably they are filling high-end jobs and have significant resources lobbying on their behalf, increasing the chance they will ultimately get in. And by default you are making it much harder to outsource potentially thousands of good-paying "information age" jobs through visa abuse.

    It seems like we have a choice -- we can protect many American jobs by making visas tougher to get, potentially risking that some smart guy doesn't get to work for an American multinational that buries its profits in Ireland. Or we can make them easy, bulk import foreigners, outsource jobs and render Americans unemployed on the outside chance that 1 in every 10,000 we import is some genius who makes a bunch of multinational executives fabulously wealthy.

    Sounds like a hard choice.

  59. Re:Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You are incredibly stupid. Intel has been building fabs in Chandler AZ for literally decades now, so obviously these aren't problems. Power is dirt cheap in AZ, and water is too (that's why they have so many "water features"), though you could argue that the water situation is not sustainable. Land is cheap too. AZ hasn't had an earthquake in forever; it's very geologically stable. There's no natural disasters there ever, unless you count dust storms. And it's close to California and the port of LA.

    Workers wit "better moral and work ethics"? Apparently not workers who are educated in the English language if you're an example of them. If upper-midwest workers were so great, then that region would be competing with California. Guess what? It's not; it's a backwater.

    And milder weather? You're a moron. It never snows in Phoenix, so they never have problems transporting product in and out. Snowstorms are common in the midwest and upper midwest.

  60. and?? by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    How will this help the poor white folks of OH, WV, MI, and IN? Wait, they wouldn't have the skills to work there anyway.

    1. Re:and?? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      A rising tide lifts all boats -- except the ones with holes in the head.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:and?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's no holes in the head how do you flush them?

  61. Not Most Powerful Chips in 3-4 Years by mentil · · Score: 1

    3-4 years from now, competitors will already be on 5nm process, so Intel's finished 7nm plant won't be using the latest process. If production starts more on the 3-year side, they might be releasing 7nm chips a few months before AMD releases 5nm chips. Regardless, AMD will be on 7nm in 2 years, and if Ryzen is as competitive as rumors say, then Intel will be 1-2 years late. Assuming of course that this Fab 42 is Intel's first 7nm plant. They may end up using it to produce chipsets rather than 7nm CPUs that're being manufactured at another plant years earlier.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Not Most Powerful Chips in 3-4 Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, Intel's 7nm isn't the same as other manufacturer's 7nm. It's smaller.

    2. Re:Not Most Powerful Chips in 3-4 Years by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      AMD is completely dependent on the technology of others like Global and TSMC. Intel can fail at developing a new process and still fall back on external vendors.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Not Most Powerful Chips in 3-4 Years by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is that because Intel use metric nanometres?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Not Most Powerful Chips in 3-4 Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genuine question, or just a chance to get a joke in? Most of the new fabs have taken to measuring non-traditional feature sizes to come up with a new number (or not basing the NM on feature sizes at all). The fab scale has not been equal to either the transistor size, the channel width, gate, or pitch for a long time.

  62. Re:Trump scare maybe by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

    All successes in jobs in this country will be hailed as due to fear of tweet.

    All jobs that move offshore will be 'pfft' -- stink jobs, that leave bad taste in my mouth.

    It is best if you read this message as if Russian politburo babushka who has seen it all and is no longer impressed.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  63. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If that's the dumbest thing you've seen today, then you must have missed Trump using the POTUS official twitter account to attack a company for having the audacity to make a business decision affecting his daughter.

    It's not speculation anymore, Trump has PROVEN he will use his position as POTUS to punish companies on a whim. So speculating that this was done out of fear is not crazy. Not anymore.

  64. Re:Trump scare maybe by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mostly because they're beholden to the teacher's unions.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  65. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ShariaBlue

  66. Intel will probably close an older fab in Chandler by billrp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fab 12 opened in 1996, and I suspect they will close that when Fab 42 opens, so there might not be any actual net increase in employers once construction is complete.

  67. Re:Water crisis? Let's build a plant there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have 4 fabs in AZ.
    There are infrastructure advantages to having FABS near each other for supply chain reasons,

  68. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly why news like this needs to be censored since it helps Trump. This should not have been posted to /.

  69. Re:Trump scare maybe by tattood · · Score: 1

    This is why we would would prefer discussing technology to politics in this forum.

    Because there is never any name-calling in the tech-related comments?

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  70. Obama Backtracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I will end wars in the middle east.
    I will close Gitmo
    You will be able to keep your doctor and your insurance
    We will fund shovel ready jobs
    This will be the most transparent and honest administration ever
    We will be able to lower the seas.

    Do I really need to go on? The fact that you all seem to need to make up stories every day about how bad Trump is, instead of reporting the truth about him, makes me think he isn't all that bad. Its the opposite of last president where he would tell a woman that her mother shouldn't get medical treatment and take a pain pill instead and the media pretended it didn't happen.

    No one is any longer convinced of your crap.

    1. Re: Obama Backtracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I once considered the lefts claims and even sided with them. Now it seems they cry wolf too much.

    2. Re:Obama Backtracks by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      It's easy to point out a few things he didn't accomplish or managed to finish but that doesn't speak about his capabilities as a leader or what he actually accomplished under a minority congress. If you know anything about Obama's presidency you wouldn't even have tried to post such petty non-sense.

      On the flip side, you boast a leader that has shown nothing but distrust in his first 2 weeks in office. Not only does he prioritize his own interest and business but he also believes its more important to use his press secretary to announce things such as "he does not walk the white house in a bath robe", or argue a photo that shows a small crowd at his inauguration. Additionally he has selected a number of leaders who just don't give a damn about the little people.

      The irony is that in the position I current occupy, I will highly benefit from Trump's actions yet I do not approve of them. Unfortunately the people have been conned and will need to find out the hard way that their vote was counter productive to their well being.

      And if you so strongly believe, why not post under your actual account name instead of anonymously?

    3. Re: Obama Backtracks by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I second this. I once considered the lefts claims and even sided with them. Now it seems they cry wolf too much.

      I think you miss understand the meaning of the expression "crying wolf" or you believe the fake news and alternative facts provided by this administration.

      All I'll say is that left and left-center have come out and expressed their distrust in a president that is not loved by the majority (didn't win popular vote and has the lowest approval rating after inauguration of any president in history). This is something the right wing rarely do because they don't even believe their own crap.

    4. Re:Obama Backtracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiight, so instead of addressing his backtracks, you laud ambiguous "things he DID accomplish." Gotcha.

    5. Re:Obama Backtracks by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You lack arguments and facts, just like the Trump administration. I'm not surprised you support them since facts clearly matter little to you.

      But all that doesn't matter because at the end of the day, you, the American low to medium income consumer will be paying for his mistakes, not the rich.

  71. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Of course you have no proof of your accusations.

    Sure I do. Just read the news. Something new comes out of everyday to support my accusations.

  72. Re:Trump scare maybe by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has nothing directly to do with Trump. The world is forcing the US to transition to a UN mediated fixed exchange rate system with a supranational reserve currency that will function like Keynes' Bancor. The USD will drop in value, which will make imports much more expensive (probably around 20%, which is greater than most profit margins).

    To the extent Trump is a part of this, it is because Congress has for 10 years dragged their feet to enact appropriate measures, and there will likely be a great deal of pain in the short term. Trump both distracts the populace from this huge problem, particularly with stupid shit like Devos. I mean, look at yourself. The Department of Education shouldn't even exist. Education has only gotten worse since it was created, in my lifetime and I'm not old. Sure, she's a stupid choice and her nonsense about school vouchers couldn't be more ridiculous. But, at the end of the day, education is a local matter and what she believes or desires is irrelevant.

  73. Re:Seriously, Pee Wee Herman type guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen half an ep of BBT, hated it, never watched it again. Couldn't tell you which character is 'Sheldon Cooper' even tho I've heard the name.
    - Different AC from GP

  74. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Still better than the alternative was.

    Hillary was safe and predictable. Trump is not. OTOH, I'm going to do quite well when the stock market corrects and/or crashes in the near future.

  75. Re:Trump scare maybe by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But clearly not the children of their constituents.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  76. BK-Trump Lovefest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is known that BK has a hard on for Trump and the Intel workforce hate him for it and call him out for involving Intel in partisan politics.

    1. Re:BK-Trump Lovefest by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed.]

      Engineers, generally being competent people who have to think for a living, tend to be conservative. I can understand the Intel workforce not being happy with their CEO getting into bed with the gov't, but they'd be even more unhappy if he cozied up to a Clinton.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  77. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Altrag · · Score: 2

    Hilary was predictable. I'm not so sure about safe.

    Trump's election was because he was unpredictable. When the predictable option is bad, the unpredictable one is at least a ray of hope.

    Of course he's now doing everything he can to smash that hope, but it was there long enough to get him into office.

  78. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hillary was more predictable, but not safe in any way. She was predictably going to ignore the constitution, grow federal power and skate by on lies regarding her crimes, now she will likely get some justice.

    The current .com bubble is going to pop, no matter who's in charge. But the huge correction will be in China.

    The real key is the Supreme Court. Which is now safe for at least another 20+ years. Which means we won't have to shoot the bastards.

    Also note: Any SC justices only have to be less openly partisan the Sotomayor. A very low bar to pass. Going to be particularly fun watching Ginsburg's replacement.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  79. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cancer is also predictable.

  80. Intel a chronic cheater on benchmarks by Burz · · Score: 1

    And they were found guilty of bribing vendors not to use AMD chips.

    Intel partners with software companies, and gets them to use their compiler that switches off optimizations on non-Intel CPUs 'just because...' regardless of capabilities.

    And now they're pushing Trump's deregulation pro-pollution agenda. That's the last straw from these crooked people.

  81. Re: Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about children, they can't vote.

    By the time they can vote, Christian charter schools will have them well educated to understand the advantages of voting for big businesses. There's plenty of time to fix that problem.

  82. Anyone remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this announcement - https://newsroom.intel.com/news-releases/president-obama-visits-intels-oregon-research-and-manufacturing-site-highlights-education-jobs-and-innovation/
    or this announcement - http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/2011-03-28-intel-manufacturing.htm
    or this one - http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/18/nation/la-naw-obama-otellini-20110219

    Seems like Intel is just making sure they aren't the target of regulation (or are the beneficiary of better taxes) by directly or indirectly throwing the president an economic bone. It's smart business in the USA (for like the last 200 years or so), even if everyone loves to hate Trump right now (any new president for that matter).

  83. Re: Thanks Obama by saloomy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is nothing President Trump can do that some media out there won't paint as badly for him as fast as possible. If Trump had personally financed a subsidiary, the NYT would still find some dog shit to smear him with. Where's the bright side of media? The puff pieces they put out that at least give Americans hope their country is still the greatest place to live? These Media wars are so bad, it's like watching that scene in The Godfather when Michael says "We have reporters on payroll, we can paint this cop as a crooked cop". Here, it's the parties that are the rackets, and Trump is just the next cop on the street.

  84. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and skate by on lies regarding her crimes, now she will likely get some justice.

    What crimes?

  85. Re:Trump scare maybe by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Only from the emacs-culated.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  86. Trump 100% Wrong Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not tired of all this winning!

    1. Re:Trump 100% Wrong Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing has been won. Chandler, AZ is a nexus of cheap visa labor. 3K new jobs may be created but it is likely they will be going to visa workers and newly minted greencards. Sucks but that's the way it goes.

  87. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it comes to the Presidency unpredictability is extremely bad. Can you imagine how the Cuban missile crisis would have played out if the President then wasn't predictable?

    For me it just seems like there is a sizeable population that has no sense of history. A lot of rules we decided not to break in the 60's are suddenly up for grabs in the modern era. Why could we defeat the reds then without torture but now we have to resort to it?

    Trump's belligerence makes America just look weak. The world knows we don't have the resources to go to war with everybody so that why you see China testing boundaries to make him look bad. Russia will do the same, so will Iran, they have all done it and will do it a whole lot more now.

    Obama's perhaps biggest mistake as President was drawing a red line and saying no further without backing up his statement. There were a lot of political ramifications for going further but thats why you don't make the first statement.

    Trumps big mistake is threatening everybody so America ceases to look like the good guy in any of our foreign involvements.

  88. If you want good ones, just pay for good ones by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The old way was that employers would pinky swear that there were no Americans to fill the jobs, and the regulatory agencies could audit it (but very rarely did).

    The new way is you get priority by offering a salary higher than those "just out of school" data scientists normally make. You say you want "data scientists, and good ones". Fine, you can have them, you just have to pay a salary commensurate with "data scientists, and good ones". And you DON'T have to go into a lottery against Infosys with their applications for underpaid code monkeys.

    Specifically, the priority level of your application is:
    (The salary you're offering) / (The average salary of data scientists in your area).
    So if you want good ones, pay a good salary and you get them - without having to win the H1-B lottery.

  89. 3,000 by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Hire 3,000 refugees? That's a lot of Starbucks trips!
     

  90. Re: Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me again when the government and its representatives didn't punish or reward companies based on their current policies?

  91. Re:Trump scare maybe by Z80a · · Score: 1

    It's not about Trump, but people being so worried about their jobs, they're willing to vote on trump to get em.

  92. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Listen folks this had NOTHING to do with Trump. It was only announced with Trump and there is even photos online of them announcing it together. They were going to do this anyways and Trump is usually always present when Intel makes announcements. Folks don't believe the constant stream of news articles announcing new jobs for America after an executive meets with Trump, its all coincidence! Folks Trump probably doesn't even cross the minds of these companies and their executives when they make decisions. I mean what power does Trump even have in America?

    -NY times

  93. Re:Trump scare maybe by martinX · · Score: 1

    I clearly remember Bushitler, so Trump must be Hitler 3.0.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  94. Re:Trump scare maybe by martinX · · Score: 1

    Oh, no, he TWITTERED THEM. He attacked them with Twitter. Say it ain't so! Quick, get out while you can!

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  95. Re:Trump scare maybe by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    There is some reason to believe that the US will be a more business-friendly place during the lifespan of this fab, i.e. lower taxes and fewer draconian regulations. Ireland has ceased being a tax haven due to EU pressures, and any place with a high Muslim population is a risk for physical damage. Intel has had 3 months to weigh the pros and cons, and a Trump administration may have been enough to tip the balance to Arizona.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  96. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of them was Lisa Murkowski (sp?) of Alaska.
    Alaska is pretty red.

    The other was from maine which split between clinton and trump.

    MAYBE they voted the way they did because they actually have a conscience.

    When you reduce it to nothing more than craven self-interest you encourage the worst behavior since there is no upside to ever being principled.

  97. Re: Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you vi faggot

  98. Re:Trump scare maybe by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Ooh! Ooh! I'm bleeding from that tongue lashing.

    Look here, snowflake: words are not punishment.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  99. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you overdosed on cum. Relax, put all those huge dirty black dicks down and drink some water.

  100. Re:Trump scare maybe by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    The UN fairies are forcing nothing. When the US stops supporting the UN, the UN will dissipate like a kicked puffball.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  101. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Trump's nominations for department heads, and those already confirmed, are as a group the best in the last 190 years. He's a patriot. He's the first President since Reagan who has an understanding of economics and power politics. His picks especially stand in contrast to Obama's p(r)icks, who were explicitly dedicated to destroying America's culture, economy, freedom, and military strength.

    You, on the other hand, can't see beyond your ideology.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  102. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Treason. Influence peddling. Perjury.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  103. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deregulation is already happening at regulatory bodies falling under the executive branch. The FCC rolled back the zero-rating prohibition and dropped the inquiries into AT&T and Verizon for previous violations. Trump's executive orders are weakening financial regulation:

    The executive order affecting Dodd-Frank is vague in its wording and expansive in its reach. It never mentions the law by name, instead laying out “core principles” for regulations that include empowering American investors and enhancing the competitiveness of American companies. Even so, it gives the Treasury the authority to restructure major provisions of Dodd-Frank, and it directs the Treasury secretary to make sure existing laws align with administration goals.

    Mr. Trump’s action on the fiduciary rule, which Democrats and consumer groups immediately denounced as a gift to Wall Street, could have a more concrete impact. His memorandum directs the Labor Department to review whether the rule may “adversely affect” investors’ ability to access financial advice — and if it does, it authorizes the agency to rescind and revise the rule.

    If you doubt that further environmental, business, and consumer regulatory cutbacks are on the way you are in for a surprise.

  104. Re:Intel will probably close an older fab in Chand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't shut down fab 12 because they're currently working in interconnecting fab 12, 32, and 42.

  105. Re:Trump scare maybe by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
    No big deal. His wife has bigger balls. She sued a blogger for what she claims messed up her plans to cash in big over the next 4/8/12 years of her First Ladyness.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/07/opinion/melania-trump-inc-imperiled.html

    Mrs. Trump contends in the suit, her “brand has lost significant value, and major business opportunities that were otherwise available to her have been lost and/or substantially impacted.” The suit offers no specific examples of lost business opportunities.

    The timing of the story was particularly injurious, according to the lawsuit, considering that Mrs. Trump “had the unique, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, as an extremely famous and well-known person, as well as a former professional model and brand spokesperson, and successful businesswoman, to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories, each of which could have garnered multimillion-dollar business relationships for a multiyear term during which plaintiff is one of the most photographed women in the world.”

    There is no benign way to look at that claim. Mrs. Trump evidently believes her new title affords her a chance to rake in millions of dollars.

  106. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh bullshit. The checks and balances built into the American political system seem to be working just fine.

    Electoral college fail

  107. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Treason. Influence peddling. Perjury.

    Treason: If it was as simple as giving aid and comfort to our enemies, then Trump is guilty. Putin certainly loves him and help get him elected.

    Influence peddling: You think the Trump's aren't using this to directly enrich themselves? Really? The clinton foundation was at least somewhat transparent.

    Perjury: Sadly he hasn't been under oath yet, though he should be guilty because of his blatant and continual flat out lies to the people who elected him..

  108. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Trump's nominations for department heads, and those already confirmed, are as a group the best in the last 190 years. He's a patriot. He's the first President since Reagan who has an understanding of economics and power politics. His picks especially stand in contrast to Obama's p(r)icks, who were explicitly dedicated to destroying America's culture, economy, freedom, and military strength.

    As we say in California, "What are you smoking and where can I get some?"

    You, on the other hand, can't see beyond your ideology.

    What ideology would that be?

  109. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Mr. Trumpâ(TM)s action on the fiduciary rule, which Democrats and consumer groups immediately denounced as a gift to Wall Street, could have a more concrete impact. His memorandum directs the Labor Department to review whether the rule may "adversely affect" investors' ability to access financial advice — and if it does, it authorizes the agency to rescind and revise the rule.

    The fiduciary rule would have saved consumers $17B per year by forcing financial advisers to consider the best interest of their client and not themselves. You're okay with Wall Street ripping you off in your retirement accounts?

  110. Re:Intel will probably close an older fab in Chand by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    They also might find a customer for Fab 12.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  111. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I'm with you on this, and I agree with a post near mine that points out that Clinton is no Elizabeth Warren.

    However, I think Trump will be great medicine for America.

    Let's swing that goddam needle all the way to the right and get it out of our collective systems.

    I'm 71 years old, and a political junkie. This is all amazing.

    Things are getting wild at the speed of dark.

    Popcorn stock is up.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  112. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Hillary had more baggage than a goddam airport.

    She was Obama 2.0 (so, I'm agreeing with you).

    The real risk-takers now are the Republicans and the Trump private portfolios.

    2018 should be interesting.

    I am making no predictions.

    I totally blew up my political credibility this election cycle.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  113. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    We don't have any enemies. The last list of enemies was World War II.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  114. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Especially Daily Mail

    Wikipedia Bans Daily Mail As 'Unreliable' Source

    .

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  115. Re: Thanks Obama by tonywong · · Score: 1

    Trump DOES get credit for this, Intel lobbied hard to get Dodd-Frank repealed and Trump is going to do so. Intel gives credit to Trump for jobs while Intel gets to buy conflict minerals again.

    https://boingboing.net/2017/02/08/leak-trump-will-allow-us-comp.html

    +1 for big business. -1 for the good of humanity. Fits Trump's intentions perfectly.

  116. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Treason: Hillary took BRIBES from RUSSIA to sell them uranium. Yes, Hillary took BRIBES from RUSSIA to sell them uranium.

    Influence peddling: Hillary took BRIBES from RUSSIA to sell them uranium. One more time... Hillary took BRIBES from RUSSIA to sell them uranium.

    Perjury: She was under oath to Congress and lied about her email server. Yes, lying under oath to Congress is perjury.

    Now if you would like to list specifics of Trump doing anything even a fraction as bad as taking bribes to set State Department policy, I would love to hear them.

    In addition, Hillary was also calling for a no-fly zone over Syria, which Putin had said he would not obey. That means she was advocating for a SHOOTING WAR with Russia. Let me repeat that for you slow leftist... Hillary was advocating for a SHOOTING WAR with Russia while running for president.
    Again, I think attempting to be friendly with Russia to get rid of ISIS is a MUCH more reasonable path that starting a SHOOTING WAR with them because they are not killing the correct people.

  117. But they will close the old plants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel has always built new fabs and then pawned off the old ones on startups who can't afford to operate them who then close them down letting go whatever staff Intel didn't keep.

  118. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget over 100 felony counts of deliberate security compromise. Putting classified information onto an unclassified network is a felony. At the least it is the felony of failure to protect (which has no intent requirement, an accidental compromise is still a crime) but the scope of the violations indicates it was not accidental but intentional disregard for the laws pertaining to the proper handling of classified information.

  119. Re:Seriously, Pee Wee Herman type guy? by hoover · · Score: 1

    The ratings may have gone nothing but upl for the BBT, but the quality has been constantly declining since at least the end of season two. It's just not as funny as it just to be, not enough geek / nerd content and too many love stories. ;-)

    --
    Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
  120. Re: Trump scare maybe by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Says the vi-rgin.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  121. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by radl33t · · Score: 1

    Those are just idiot fees for people who don't manually oversee their own investments in low cost index funds. We love taking advantage of idiots in this country, cough, ahem.

  122. Re:Trump scare maybe by dalutong · · Score: 1

    States with teachers unions have, on average, better schools. So unions don't seem to be killing schools. So what's wrong with them?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  123. Re: Trump scare maybe by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    Huh. It's almost as if this is just about the political indoctrination of children, and not education at all!

    It's clear our schools have simply becomes tools for right-wing nazi indoctrination. We need to purge the last remaining 3 school teachers who aren't democrats so our education system can get back to what it was meant to do: turn out highly educated Gender Studies and Transafrican Demieskimo Theory majors ready to enter the workforce.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  124. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Those are just idiot fees for people who don't manually oversee their own investments in low cost index funds.

    Millions of people have no choice but to participate in the Wall Street casino since corporations moved away from pensions to 401Ks. While corporations saved billions in yearly costs, future retirees are losing billions in yearly fees.

    We love taking advantage of idiots in this country, cough, ahem.

    Which is why government regulations are needed.

  125. Re:reasons enough: tax cuts and deregulatory polic by radl33t · · Score: 1

    yes, I am plainly expressing the justification that large amounts of US citizenry accept. It is ok to use power, leverage, and expertise to steal.

  126. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Especially Daily Mail

    Wikipedia Bans Daily Mail As 'Unreliable' Source

    Does it really matter in today's fact free political environment?

  127. Re:Trump scare maybe by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    One of them was Lisa Murkowski (sp?) of Alaska.
    Alaska is pretty red.

    And recently governed by Sarah Palin. I'm out of mod points, but I'm still bumping this AC because s/he has a good point. The rest follows:

    The other was from maine which split between clinton and trump.

    MAYBE they voted the way they did because they actually have a conscience.

    When you reduce it to nothing more than craven self-interest you encourage the worst behavior since there is no upside to ever being principled.

  128. Why use NYT to keep score? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Only 20 to 40% of Americans think the NYTimes is unbiased ... so why are they the score keepers on this.

    And why is the premise that unless the government is forking out money Trump had no say in it. This presupposes government corruption is what fuels and improves the economy (when the US became a world power long before there was a FED or any other federal government economic aparatus).

  129. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Not an honest question, you are wasting your time arguing with a brick.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  130. Do the added jobs include ... by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Do the added jobs include the ones lost when they shut down their oldest fab, #12, which produces 65nm and is located in ... Chandler, Arizona?

  131. Re: Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Probably not much.

    People who are interested in fact-checked news from sources that have actual journos know where to go.

    Those who prefer to live in the warm, comfortable, bubble of confirmation bias are not going to go there.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  132. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, where is the responsibility from Trump to the truth or the facts? Someone who does NOTHING but LIE all day long probably doesn't get much credibility from an organization ostensibly trying to get at the truth. The one thing we can all learn from this: While all politicians are liars for stretching and spinning what the truth is, we have someone now setting new lows for outright falsehoods and intentional misstatements of fact. So maybe the same old corruption ain't bad after all in comparison with outright horseshit.
    Or would you care to state EXACTLY what President Trump had to do with Intel's decision to reignite construction on a plant started some years ago? Krzanich is just sucking Trump's cock so Trump can splooge in the face of the American people. Again. That's the truth.

  133. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary was safe? I really don't think so because...

    Hillary has internalized a combination of 2 very very dangerous ideas:
    a) the US is strong enough to dictate terms to everybody including the Russians and Chine (simply untrue)
    b) the US needs to police/control the entire world

    Couple that with the fact that she flatout stated that the US would try to enforce a no-fly zone in Syria if she became president, despite US military having pointed out that would require us to go to war with russia

    I honestly think there was a 80%+ chance that Hillary would've started WWIII

  134. Re:Trump scare maybe by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Oh bullshit. The checks and balances built into the American political system seem to be working just fine.

    HRC campaign fail

    FTFY. As if she and the DNC didn't know how the system works. She didn't set foot in Wisconsin...why?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  135. Re:Trump scare maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck if I know, or care. Most likely because stupid people don't fucking matter. Wisconsin's are primarily Republicans who aren't willing to take their own advice and pick themselves up by their own boot-straps, like they expect brown people to. If the jobs in your field have dried up, then go learn a new fucking skill, or move to where the jobs are, rather than have your government artificially prop up a dying industry, like they're trying to do for the coal miners.

    Anyway, the facts are:
    1) Nobody voted for Trump - they were only voting against Hillary.
    2) Trump's own party didn't even want him.
    3) Three fucking-MILLION more people voted for her.

    So, yeah, the electoral college had a chance to keep this mad-man out of the presidency and failed to do so.

    I know you ever be able to admit to your buyer's remorse. You've got to keep up the pretense that this fucking bull-in-a-china-shop has got the slightest clue what he is doing. I mean, I'm sure you're smart enough to see through all his lies telling you otherwise. But it's still better than that crooked, fucking Hillary Clinton, innit? *wink* *wink*

    I guess, in your eyes, it's preferable to have a lying, narcissistic, sexual-predative, con-artist destroy the country.

    Funny, but I dont' remember the entire country^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hworld getting out in the streets and protesting everything Obama did. Do you?

  136. Re:Why the comment from the fake news outlet? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I honestly think there was a 80%+ chance that Hillary would've started WWIII

    Uh, no. This WWIII nonsense started after Trump won the election and his supporters tried to dispute the perception that Trump would probably start WWIII by accident. He's doing a fine job in pissing off allies and making enemies happy.