I would not have called IntelliJ light either. I mean it is a full IDE java app. So, it pulls in the JVM and such.
I don't think comparing VSCode and IntelliJ is a good comparison. VSCode is an editor not an IDE. Granted it does have an nice extensions interface and you might be able to make it into an IDE. Notepad++ also has a nice extensions interface.
So, bundling a back-end, browser (Blink), and a pile of java script is light weight (i.e. an Electron app)? When I start VSCode with an empty document it starts 6 processes and uses about 400MB on windows versus say Notepad++ which is a single process and about 30MB.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
Does she use her FB account as an official communications channel? Sean Spicer specifically said that Trump's twitter account is an official communications from the POTUS. http://www.nbcnews.com/politic...
By doing so, the administration as changed the nature of Trump's twitter account from personal to official. The courts will need to decide if this is the case. If the courts find that Trump's twitter account is an official communications channel for the POTUS, then a lot of rules apply to it. As a personal account, he could do what he wanted.
Any person acting as an official representative of the US government has many laws covering his communication with the public. They are alleging that the presidents twitter account is being used for official communications with the public, and as such he can not bar some citizens from receiving those communications.
Google has not infringed upon anyone's right to free speech. Google is a private company and is under no obligation to provide a platform for anyone's speech. Just like news papers, private companies can decide what they will host (or register) and it is not a violation of free speech rights.
The law protects you from the government infringing upon your free speech rights.
This does not stop anyone from expressing themselves.
Yes, so what is your point? That image does not have the word neurology on it. In fact, it talks about gene expression, protein-protein interaction, protein-protein interaction between humans and yeast, E coli swarming, and cell swarming. Almost all of that is microbiology, excepting the macro swarming of E. coli.
Yes, he did. And I just went and looked a the citations. What is interesting some of the citations don't actually support his conclusions. And one of the ideas/papers is related to a study of highly functioning autistic people. This seems less than convincing....
I found the dichotomy he sets up between the left and the right at the beginning of the paper humorous and clearly just his opinion and not really helpful to his argument.
In truth individual variation is such that none of the generalities he puts forward should be used to judge a persons qualifications for a job. I know he specifically says that in his memo. I wonder what his goal was. He could have left just a few things out of this memo or in fact expressed them slightly differently and not got the reaction he did. I suppose he was just trying to get Google to stop providing services to groups he sees and being treated special.
I find it amazing that he claims that the left denies science. The current administration should clearly demonstrate what part of the political spectrum in the US is denying science. Though, I am sure it is not isolated to any part of the political spectrum. People can easily ignore evidence if it is inconvenient.
I see that his biggest offense is having embarrassed Google.
How about you or he show some evidence of his claims? Show that it is not socialization the accounts for the differences in the numbers of men and women in a particular field. Nursing is mostly women, are men unsuited for it or are they trained for boys that it is a woman's job?
When I went to college (1992) 18% of my class in computer science were women. Currently, I believe the number is much closer to 5%. Why did that happen? I believe because as computers became more available to the public the stereo type of the computer nerd came with it. These social aspects make computer science less attractive to women.
I believe the issues of the gender gap is mostly social training and not biological. I challenge you to provide any scientific study that would clearly suggest that the differences are biological.
Of course, I have to say I do not understand the real issue here. Clearly people are free to chose what they study or do for work. So, why is it such a political battle around this? Do women have to like computer science as much as men? Do men have to want to be nurses at the same rate as women?
In the 5 major corporations I have worked for I have not seen this "bro" culture. The groups I have worked for wanted competent people men or women. Anyone who chooses their employees based on elements other than their abilities are choosing poorly.
Your understanding leaves much to be desired. Since California is an at will state. The company does not need a reason to fire a person. They do not have to defend their actions, unless they are being accused of discrimination of a protected class. Dumb ass, who embarrasses the company is not a protected class.
Though flag burning may be personally offensive, it is the right of any American. It is the essence of free political speech that is guaranteed by the constitution.
Well, this is the first I have heard this. The things to be considered are that coal fired plants are generally operated for 40 or 50 years. So, is the cost of solar cheaper than continuing to use the coal plants that exist? No. What is going to happen if they are correct is the construction of new coal plants will slow and stop by 2026. The remaining coal plants will continue to operate for some time.
Further, even if the CO2 emissions are lower than was originally predicted, no where in the article did it suggest that will happen quick enough to prevent some of the bad side effects of all the carbon released into the atmosphere. You seem to assume, because coal use will slow down the that everything will be hunky dory. I suspect that is wishful thinking on your part.
I can understand lithium ion batteries for portables and maybe for a home, but grid scale batteries will likely be flow batteries or other such tech. Why because they are big and stationary. You don't need particularly compact or space efficient batteries on that scale. It is more important to be durable, low toxicity, and inexpensive (relatively).
So, he has an opinion that he gave on his twitter feed. So, fucking what?
Do you think that Trump somehow made a deal? The only information the article has is:
It comes as the technology industry has pushed back against the Trump administration, amid mounting pressure to move manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. There will be no incentives from the federal government for the Intel project, the White House said.
Intel has a number of semiconductor fabrication plants in the US. In fact, they have 4 in Chandler, AZ. So, I think it is a good bet the Trump had little or nothing to do with the decision, but Intel is taking advantage of the politics.
Slashdot Mirror
Always produce significant and valid results .... NOT!
I would not have called IntelliJ light either. I mean it is a full IDE java app. So, it pulls in the JVM and such.
I don't think comparing VSCode and IntelliJ is a good comparison. VSCode is an editor not an IDE. Granted it does have an nice extensions interface and you might be able to make it into an IDE. Notepad++ also has a nice extensions interface.
So, bundling a back-end, browser (Blink), and a pile of java script is light weight (i.e. an Electron app)? When I start VSCode with an empty document it starts 6 processes and uses about 400MB on windows versus say Notepad++ which is a single process and about 30MB.
Yes, you can. But you can not buy a global top level domain for less.
Hmmmm ... It does not look like Edge is more compliant.
https://html5test.com/results/...
You do realize that the Justice department is part of the executive branch right?
One of my favorite quotes seems appropriate here:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
C.S. Lewis
If you want to make it unprofitable for undocumented foreigners, then the government should prosecute the employers that hire them.
However, that won't happen, because the Republicans don't really want to change anything. They just want to use the issue politically.
Does she use her FB account as an official communications channel? Sean Spicer specifically said that Trump's twitter account is an official communications from the POTUS. http://www.nbcnews.com/politic...
By doing so, the administration as changed the nature of Trump's twitter account from personal to official. The courts will need to decide if this is the case. If the courts find that Trump's twitter account is an official communications channel for the POTUS, then a lot of rules apply to it. As a personal account, he could do what he wanted.
Any person acting as an official representative of the US government has many laws covering his communication with the public. They are alleging that the presidents twitter account is being used for official communications with the public, and as such he can not bar some citizens from receiving those communications.
I wonder why you think the left uses more hate speech. Do you have some evidence or are you making this judgement with your own bias.
Google has not infringed upon anyone's right to free speech. Google is a private company and is under no obligation to provide a platform for anyone's speech. Just like news papers, private companies can decide what they will host (or register) and it is not a violation of free speech rights.
The law protects you from the government infringing upon your free speech rights.
This does not stop anyone from expressing themselves.
Yes, so what is your point? That image does not have the word neurology on it. In fact, it talks about gene expression, protein-protein interaction, protein-protein interaction between humans and yeast, E coli swarming, and cell swarming. Almost all of that is microbiology, excepting the macro swarming of E. coli.
Wow
Yes, he did. And I just went and looked a the citations. What is interesting some of the citations don't actually support his conclusions. And one of the ideas/papers is related to a study of highly functioning autistic people. This seems less than convincing....
I found the dichotomy he sets up between the left and the right at the beginning of the paper humorous and clearly just his opinion and not really helpful to his argument.
In truth individual variation is such that none of the generalities he puts forward should be used to judge a persons qualifications for a job. I know he specifically says that in his memo. I wonder what his goal was. He could have left just a few things out of this memo or in fact expressed them slightly differently and not got the reaction he did. I suppose he was just trying to get Google to stop providing services to groups he sees and being treated special.
I find it amazing that he claims that the left denies science. The current administration should clearly demonstrate what part of the political spectrum in the US is denying science. Though, I am sure it is not isolated to any part of the political spectrum. People can easily ignore evidence if it is inconvenient.
I see that his biggest offense is having embarrassed Google.
He co-wrote two papers on microbiology, not neurology.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
I guess people are easily misled by someone spouting BS.
He was a microbiologist. Hardly qualifies him to make judgements about the what is biological based versus social based in humans.
He is clearly smart, but has remarkably poor judgement.
How about you or he show some evidence of his claims? Show that it is not socialization the accounts for the differences in the numbers of men and women in a particular field. Nursing is mostly women, are men unsuited for it or are they trained for boys that it is a woman's job?
When I went to college (1992) 18% of my class in computer science were women. Currently, I believe the number is much closer to 5%. Why did that happen? I believe because as computers became more available to the public the stereo type of the computer nerd came with it. These social aspects make computer science less attractive to women.
I believe the issues of the gender gap is mostly social training and not biological. I challenge you to provide any scientific study that would clearly suggest that the differences are biological.
Of course, I have to say I do not understand the real issue here. Clearly people are free to chose what they study or do for work. So, why is it such a political battle around this? Do women have to like computer science as much as men? Do men have to want to be nurses at the same rate as women?
In the 5 major corporations I have worked for I have not seen this "bro" culture. The groups I have worked for wanted competent people men or women. Anyone who chooses their employees based on elements other than their abilities are choosing poorly.
Your understanding leaves much to be desired. Since California is an at will state. The company does not need a reason to fire a person. They do not have to defend their actions, unless they are being accused of discrimination of a protected class. Dumb ass, who embarrasses the company is not a protected class.
Though flag burning may be personally offensive, it is the right of any American. It is the essence of free political speech that is guaranteed by the constitution.
Well, this is the first I have heard this. The things to be considered are that coal fired plants are generally operated for 40 or 50 years. So, is the cost of solar cheaper than continuing to use the coal plants that exist? No. What is going to happen if they are correct is the construction of new coal plants will slow and stop by 2026. The remaining coal plants will continue to operate for some time.
Further, even if the CO2 emissions are lower than was originally predicted, no where in the article did it suggest that will happen quick enough to prevent some of the bad side effects of all the carbon released into the atmosphere. You seem to assume, because coal use will slow down the that everything will be hunky dory. I suspect that is wishful thinking on your part.
I can understand lithium ion batteries for portables and maybe for a home, but grid scale batteries will likely be flow batteries or other such tech. Why because they are big and stationary. You don't need particularly compact or space efficient batteries on that scale. It is more important to be durable, low toxicity, and inexpensive (relatively).
Do you think that Trump somehow made a deal? The only information the article has is:
Intel has a number of semiconductor fabrication plants in the US. In fact, they have 4 in Chandler, AZ. So, I think it is a good bet the Trump had little or nothing to do with the decision, but Intel is taking advantage of the politics.
You are trying to convince us that the NIH would not let you pay more? Yeah, right.
You are lying. The minimum salary for an H1B currently is 65,000/yr. How are you paying 45,000/yr? You are either breaking the law or lying.
I was curious about the quote and found this http://quoteinvestigator.com/2...