Slashdot Mirror


Russia Considers Sending Snowden Back To US As a 'Gift' To Trump (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: U.S. intelligence has collected information that Russia is considering turning over Edward Snowden as a "gift" to President Donald Trump -- who has called the NSA leaker a "spy" and a "traitor" who deserves to be executed. That's according to a senior U.S. official who has analyzed a series of highly sensitive intelligence reports detailing Russian deliberations and who says a Snowden handover is one of various ploys to "curry favor" with Trump. A second source in the intelligence community confirms the intelligence about the Russian conversations and notes it has been gathered since the inauguration. Snowden's ACLU lawyer, Ben Wizner, told NBC News they are unaware of any plans that would send him back to the United States. "Team Snowden has received no such signals and has no new reason for concern," Wizner said. Former deputy national security adviser Juan Zarate urged the Trump administration to be cautious in accepting any Snowden offer from Russian President Vladimir Putin. The White House had no comment, but the Justice Department told NBC News it would welcome the return of Snowden, who currently faces federal charges that carry a minimum of 30 years in prison. Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said talk about returning Snowden is "nonsense." If he were returned to American soil, Snowden -- a divisive figure in America who is seen by some as a hero and others as treasonous -- would face an administration that has condemned him in the strongest terms.

294 comments

  1. So an American hero might be jailed for life by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But at least your tech jobs will be protected by Trump's H-1B visa clampdown, right? Hope you can sleep well at night.

    1. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by SQL+Error · · Score: 5, Funny

      i sleep like a baby.

      That is, I wake up every couple of hours screaming.

    2. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would Snowden have fared any better with the Obama administration? Obama was somewhat more sympathetic towards Snowden, at least in public, but he weaseled out of granting him a pardon (saying he "can't") while he did commute Manning's sentence.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sleeping so very well!

    4. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was an American Hero he wouldn't be hiding in Russia like a little coward that he is. I say he should get the firing squad. Traitorous bastard.

    5. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) It's possible to feel that Trump is right on some issues like the H-1Bs but still wrong on others and/or a raging asshole.

      2) Jailed? If he's lucky. Trump has in the past implied Snowden should be executed, and his CIA director has explicitly said as much.

      3) Don't make this partisan; Obama had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. He didn't.

    6. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well played.

    7. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least your tech jobs will be protected by Trump's H-1B visa clampdown, right? Hope you can sleep well at night.

      Maybe Trump will agree to pardon Snowden in exchange for his dick being cut off. Because that's why Obama pardoned Manning, not for moral reasons but to pander to the mentally deranged.

    8. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Well, to be fair Braveheart, not everyone is a foolhardily, extradition-waiving, idiot.

      Some of us are thinking, simpering, cowards who'd gamble with asylum in a third world dictatorship versus certain prosecution in a free democracy.

      Ultimately, the thinkers have more children and you're kind will be bred out.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    9. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the right wanted him executed. I won't take you very long to find the politician to demanded Snowden's assassination in Russia.

    10. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia would have never offered Snowden to Obama. In fact the entire reason Putin took Snowden in was to embarrass Obama.

    11. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) It's possible to feel that Trump is right on some issues like the H-1Bs but still wrong on others and/or a raging asshole.

      HERETIC!

    12. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

      How did what I wrote make this partisan?

    13. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden is using Alfred Dreyfus defense tactic: Dreyfus accepted a pardon and remained someone convicted of treason, but he lived to be exonerated and return to the Army. If he had refused the pardon, he would have died on Devil's Island and it all would have taken 50 more years before his innocence would be accepted by another generation. He was criticized for taking the pardon by people who didn't face surviving Devil's Island.

    14. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meanwhile, Julian Assage sits ignored in the Ecuadorian Embassy pouting: "What about me? What about MEEEEEEEEEE!"

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    15. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That was George H. W. Bush's line after he lost the 1992 election.

    16. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair, if Clinton were president she would probably just "drone this guy" anyways.

    17. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look how well that's going

    18. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ironic and hilarious that you post anonymously while claiming people who remain anonymous should be put in front of a firing squad.

      How about you kill yourself first before we kill anyone else for doing the things that you do.

      Or so long as you believe you should be dead and keep walking around alive, we just go ahead and let everyone else do the same thing.

      Fucking hypocrites

    19. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sleep well. If Snowden got jailed that would be sweet.

    20. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That makes sense. But the fact that Putin might extradite Snowden to cosy up to Trump is hardly something you can blame Trump for directly, much less his voters.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    21. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably, the time to fight this was when Obama first droned a US Citizen, but the right didn't seem to care, such a shame cuz a lot of Obama's supporters did not support killing US Citizens without due process. Now of course we see the GOP has no problems with avoiding due process.

    22. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary?

    23. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Well, that's pretty fucking un american to just not care about more than half the country.

      What kind of fucking shit show would run like that? Oh....

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    24. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unamerican to ignore the population? In what America?

    25. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That makes sense. But the fact that Putin might extradite Snowden to cosy up to Trump is hardly something you can blame Trump for directly, much less his voters.

      True, but it does illustrate that the man Trump is determined to say nothing bad about and had even asked for support from in the form of hacking, is not a particularly honorable man, but then we already knew that.

      As far as Snowden being a coward ( a few posts down), well he did knowingly trash his life for a cause. Even if you don't think what he did was right, that took a some of bravery. It is not as if Russia was his first choice. He simply didn't have a better one. Still, if he comes back he will have a trial. He was a civilian, so he might get out eventually... I think the trial might do our country some good, eventually. Snowden is likely to lose most of the productive years of his life though.

      The sad part is I think Trump had done _far_ more actual damage so far to our country than Snowden could ever dream of, and he has only begin to break things. Can't we prosecute him for damages?

      Mythbusters proved that a bull in a china shop didn't break anything. A trump in the white house is another matter altogether.

    26. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, right after she orders a drone strike on Julian Assange.

    27. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 0

      The US doesn't want that little weasel. Nobody does, really, except for Sweden.

    28. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      Obama followed the law.

      Under the Constitution, only federal criminal convictions , such as those adjudicated in the United States District Courts, may be pardoned by the President.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    29. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Totally remove Snowden from the argument and there is nothing wrong with any US President putting the US native workforce ahead of foreign workers. And complain all you want about Trump, and there is a lot to complain about, there is nothing wrong with any US President putting US interests ahead of any other countries.

      And how can anyone be surprised that Russia is more than willing to put Snowden on a plane back to the US to cultivate favor with the US government? In our cynical world that is just politics 101. There is no downside for Russia handing him over to the US. There would be no Russian protestors storming the Kremlin to protest the decision. There will be no impassioned speeches in the Russian legislature imploring Putin to change his mind. As far as Russia is concerned Snowden's propaganda value has been used up so why not hand him over.

    30. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It looks like you're quoting something there, but without attribution it's hard to see what. What does your source say about Nixon's pardon?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      I'd say 1) is a perfect time to mention even a broken clock is right two times a day.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    32. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting to see Putin in a frilly white dress singing "Happy Birthday, Mr. President".

    33. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More Americans voted for her than any other candidate.

    34. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so they voted for the biggest loser.

    35. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget the request for russia to use their time machine for the hacking

    36. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen the ass on that bitch!

    37. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by CaptainDork · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm sorry.

      Old age.

      Here ya go.

      And, thank you.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    38. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since he is guilty as hell and deserves that punishment. Stealing classified information is a crime! Wtf doesn't anybody believe in the rule of law anymore. My god! You liberal nutjobs have all gone mad.

    39. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by rajafarian · · Score: 0

      no, bitch, the loser won

    40. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much do you like pizza and pingpong? Both Donald and the Clintons like pizza and a game of pingpong, do you?

    41. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Nixon always crops up.

      It's a textbook classic.

      It would have been catastrophic to convict Nixon.

      His signature is on many bills passed by Congress and some treaties.

      All of those could easily be contested by foreign and domestic actors.

      So, it was political and practical.

      In the case of President Nixon, he was able to receive a pardon under the precedent of an 1866 Supreme Court ruling called Ex parte Garland, which allowed for a pardon granted by President Andrew Johnson to remain in force for a former Confederate politician.

      Pre-emptive pardons remain rare. In addition to Ford’s Nixon pardon, President George H.W. Bush pardoned former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and former CIA official Duane Clarridge in late 1992 before they were tried on Iran-contra Affair charges. (Four others were convicted in the case and also pardoned.)

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    42. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the justice departments rules for asking for a pardon. They do reflect the President's constitutional pardon power.

    43. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Is+Don+the+new+Ron · · Score: 1

      You need to have your bottle close by. Drink up.

      --
      Deja vu: In the 80s we had a 70ish actor as POTUS, a woman PM in the UK, and a bald leader of that other nuke superpower
    44. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by whit3 · · Score: 1

      Would Snowden have fared any better with the Obama administration?

      That's irrelevant, of course. Only a court can decide.

      Recall, historically Aaron Burr was thought to be a traitor by Thomas Jefferson; there was a trial, and a not guilty verdict under justice John Marshall.

      Later, Jefferson Davis (President of the Confederate States of America...) was likewise in disfavor, but was never convicted (in fact, though apprehended, was never tried).

      That's because the Constitution holds that a crime must be proved in court, in the place where the crime was committed. Jefferson Davis, on trial in Virginia, 1866? With a jury of his peers?

      So, what difference does a sitting president make on an accusation of this sort? Our history suggests, 'none'.

    45. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he broke the law. period!

    46. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The left seems to have gotten over losing faster then the right has gotten over winning.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    47. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 0

      You seem more hysterical than the post you're responding to.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    48. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 2

      The leading Supreme Court case is Ex parte Garland (1867). Justice Stephen J. Field, writing for the Court in a 5-4 decision, held that the President's pardoning power is ''unlimited,'' and ''It extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.''

      http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01...

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    49. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 5, Informative

      The argument is that he's a whistleblower who exposed rampant systemic violation of the law. Not that you want to engage a real argument.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    50. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 1

      I wish I was a mind reader like you.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    51. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 1

      Yet the majority of macro economists agree the US native workforce will suffer under these immigration policies. Many thought leaders on the right (and left) see isolationism as a sure path to worse domestic conditions. Our inability to collectively acknowledge the argument that our success is interconnected is proof of how thoroughly the frame job has been during 2016.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    52. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manning was already convicted. Can't weasel out of pardoning when there wasn't a conviction to pardon. I'm not a dumbass yankee and even I know that.

    53. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wtf doesn't anybody believe in the rule of law anymore.'

      The rule of law is the rule of women over men.
      we are not allowed to marry girl children even tho God (not jesus) 's law allows it (Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew)

    54. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He signed up for martyrdom. Sort of hard to achieve the desired outcome of adoration as you fade away from intrigue with each passing day due to the public's extremely short collective attention span. Snowden has probably been begging for the Russian's to send him back for some time now.

    55. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would have been catastrophic to convict Nixon."

      Then the system is fundamentally fucked.

      Oh, we couldn't charge our CEO for being a pedo, he's done so many good things, we just asked him to go quietly away and donate half his bonus to charity.

    56. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Hillary and Obama would of done the same....

    57. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There can really be no real isolationism in today's world. Trump is not pushing an isolationist policy. A temporary immigration ban of 7 countries is not isolationist it is just Trump firing a warning shot across the bow of the international community to let them know the US can be unpredictable. US foreign policy has been backed in to the corner where almost any action the US takes abroad is criticized by all sides. That non-stop criticism over the years has filtered down to the US public and is partly responsible for getting Trump elected. It makes it easy to draw support from an angry electorate who sees nothing but enemies and ingrates.

      US foreign policy has become predictable and it's adversaries and so called allies are taking full advantage. NK has ignored US warnings and continued building nuclear weapons because they know the US is not going to use the military to stop them. China is colonizing one of the most important shipping routes and resource rich waters in the world because they know the US will not force them to stop. The US has more than enough military power to force both NK and China to re-think their policies if they wanted to use that power. All the insurgents and terrorists running around killing people know all they have to do is hole up in a location crowded with civilians because the US ROE places too much weight on the collateral damage and much less weight on actually killing the enemy. The US contribution to NATO has been taken for granted since it's inception and resulted in a lot of member countries not meeting their financial obligation because they know the US will make up any short comings. The US is the largest financial contributor to the UN and that really needs to be discussed. The countries with the permanent security council veto power should all be required to contribute the same amount of money. If a country can't meet their equal share they should lose their security council veto power.

      "collectively acknowledge the argument that our success is interconnected "
      I think a lot of people do realize the US benefits from working with the world after all it was the US that has actually did the "connecting".

    58. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My broken alarm clock shows nothing, it is never right.

    59. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So what exactly were these foreign (who?) and domestic (who?) actors going to contest and how were they going to contest it? If a person commits a crime but enters into a legal contract that has nothing to do with that crime exactly how does that crime affect the contract and by what legal theory? How long do you think the odds are of the Supreme Court declaring Nixon's time in office a titanic fucking mulligan with everything he signed having zero legal standing?

      Ford had one job: not get in the way of justice. He failed, and ever since then there has been an insidious legal theory that the President is above the law. Now that is catastrophic.

    60. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In fact the entire reason Putin took Snowden in was to embarrass Obama.

      And the entire reason Edward Snowden was stranded in Russia against his will was because the US aggressively cut off all other escape routes and invalidated his passport.

      He chose to risk his freedom and even his life to reveal illegal and arguably unpatriotic behaviour by the US "intelligence" agencies, but he never chose to become a pawn in Putin's, and now Trump's, game of self-aggrandizement.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    61. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't even want him. those, uh, trumped-up charges were made at the request of the americans. sweden is now just forced to follow through on it now.

    62. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      How come you continually repeat this lie?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    63. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Snowden must have an escape plan in place for situations like this. No way he hasn't been planning it over the years, with help from supporters and Wikileaks staff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    64. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More working Americans voted for Trump.

      Hillary only got the jobless losers who live off welfare, which is why they can find time to march on the streets like monkeys since they don't have any intelligent alternative way to spend that time.

    65. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some of us are thinking, simpering, cowards who'd gamble with asylum in a third world dictatorship versus certain prosecution in a free democracy.

      If I lived in a free democracy, I might be swayed by your argument. Since I don't, it's a dumb one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    66. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is also why, even if the conspiracy theorists are right and Obama's Birth Cert is a fake, you and I will never know about it.

      If it came out as truth, then any law he signed, all Executive Orders he made, anything he DID would have to be undone because none of it would be valid.

    67. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Would Snowden have fared any better with the Obama administration?

      No, because he made the NSA a global laughing stock and they'll push hard on any President who can get him.

    68. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy just recently showed what a phony liar he was when he said he would give himself up if Manning was pardoned, and yet there's still idiots like you defending him as if he was a victim of some kind of conspiracy. You're probably one of those people who think Bill Cosby or the guy from Subway ads are innocent.

    69. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      but he weaseled out of granting him a pardon (saying he "can't") while he did commute Manning's sentence

      A pardon and a commute are two different things. That's like saying, I couldn't book you a one off chartered flight to the Cayman islands, but I did get you an economy class seat on a discount airline that was going there anyway.

      Manning served the majority of her sentence (before parole eligibility which was only 8 years). Obama stated specifically that there was no intention to parole Manning and that the sentence was commuted due to the sentence being disproportionate to comparable crimes.

      Snowden isn't in that situation. Well he is, Obama had no more intention of paroling Snowden than Manning, but the difference is you can't commute Snowden given that he hasn't been sentenced yet.

    70. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't make this partisan; Obama had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing

      What you mean to say is that Obama had plenty of opportunity to do what you think is right. That and "the right thing" are not the same. Also "right" depends entirely on the eye of the beholder.

    71. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between Manning and Snowden is that manning went through trial and took her punishment. Snowden could have been commuted (possibly) if he had returned and was tried as well. But there's no way he was getting a full pardon.

    72. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 0

      We hatesess Julian Assange! We hatesess him!

      We hatsess him with all ourses core. Like Ralph Nader before him, he tipped our handses!

      My preciousssss! Oooooh my preciousssss!

    73. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      He's a phoney liar who didn't support Hillary!

      The worst kind!!!

    74. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      My number to remember is 52/41

      52% of white women voted for Trump
      41% of white women voted for Hillary

      The woman's candidate! Pah!

    75. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      52/41%

      White women.

      Trump/Clinton.

      President Trump.

      It reads almost like a mathematical proof.

    76. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Trump's position on H-1B visas is for the wrong reason. It's based in xenophobia, nationalism, and racism.

    77. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You slavering conservative fascists were mad to begin with.

    78. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Hate to go all AmiMoJo, but what about women who are not white?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    79. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by bfpierce · · Score: 1

      Snowden hasn't been through due process, hasn't even been convicted of anything. So yeah, you can't really 'pardon' him, you'd have to drop the charges which the DOJ can be ordered to do at any point in time.

    80. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay attention to their talking points if he is returned and Trump does everything he can to punish him (unlike Assange, he's been harsh towards Snowden). They go out of their way to defend Assange and WL since WL helped their god win, but don't give two shits about Snowden and will just parrot their leader as they have been.

    81. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As far as Snowden being a coward"

      Get used to hearing that endlessly if he is returned and Trump attacks him, as he already has. The same idiots will go out of their way to defend Assange and WL since WL helped their god win. Mindless cult.

    82. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be fair, if Clinton were president she would probably just "give everyone a check for 1 million dollars" anyways.

    83. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Have you stopped beating your wife?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    84. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a criminal and a traitor and should be jailed.

    85. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      He is American, but he is NOT an American hero.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    86. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      There are no trumped up charges. He would have left if that was so.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    87. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      ?? Nobody voted for you.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    88. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saying he "can't"

      It is called a lie, in case you are wondering. I would rather he had told the truth and said he "won't", than to lie saying that he "can't".

    89. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Found the low skill Indian.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    90. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The first line says:

      1. Submit the petition to the Office of the Pardon Attorney

      The President doesn't have to do that. The site is about circumstances under which a person may apply for a pardon. Nothing to do with the POTUS granting one on his own initiative.

      As others have said, there's precedent - Nixon.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    91. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't count in Trump America.

    92. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In the 1850s they counted as 60% of a person. Such is progress...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    93. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Implying that he is not already in 'jail'. Do you really think he is enjoying any freedom?

      The anti-Trump are worst than the anti-Obama at this point. Seriously, learn to deal with reality.

    94. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden just need to dress as a women for a time if he want pardon. All males individual must renounce cis heterosexual white privilege and must submit to the fascist feminist globalist world-state. Allahu akbar.

    95. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too. but it is because of the snakes. they are everywhere.

    96. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that traitor gets executed.

    97. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fake news from NBC as usual. Comcast is still sore about throwing away a half a million on Hillary. Sleeping like a baby.
      https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000461&cycle=2016

    98. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Snowden hasn't been through due process, hasn't even been convicted of anything.

      Neither was Nixon.
      "Pardoning" someone who has never even been arrested, let alone convicted
      of a crime is routine for lame-duck presidents wanting to reward their buddies.

    99. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have no clue what fascism is

    100. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Lie
      Hillary got exactly the group the polls said she did
      EDUCATED working Americans
      you got the Flyover state Ebay resellers and the flea market crowd.

    101. Re: So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now only if running up the score in the most populous states actually counted for something under the election rules that have existed since Thomas Jefferson sat in the White House.

      Get the fuck over your popular vote whining already. She fucking lost, because she was a deeply flawed candidate that ran an arrogant campaign that ignored the country between the mountain ranges. She fucking deserved to lose - unfortunately, the rest of us will pay the price for it.

    102. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      See you lie a lot.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    103. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do we really know there is an offer not the starting line U.S. intelligence has collected information that Russia is
      US intel lies to us all the time. We really don't know what the Russians are up to. This sounds like BS to me.

      If he does come back does this mean Hillary will go to trial too after all they commited the same crime. "Mishandling of classified material"

      Personally I don't believe a thing my government has to say any more. Actually I trust Russia more than my own government these days.

    104. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      A question, by construct, is not a lie.

      You know that and are poking.

      I get it.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    105. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by naubol · · Score: 1

      While I appreciate the sincerity of your response, it is about security and not economy, unlike the thread. The post I responded to was claiming that Trump was putting our "native workforce" first. I was responding to say that it does not put our native workforce first. Yes, it is isolationist not to take refugees from some countries. We abrogate our ability to use our soft power to spread our ideas and further connect the world which would benefit the native workforce. If you think that the value of interconnectedness is thoroughly appreciated in the population, then we must be watching and reading different news sources. There seems to be a lot of senseless and hysterical immigrant bashing as well as very weak public support for things like the TPP, which our withdrawal from has caused macro economists of all political stripes to suggest that the United States has basically lost the game in Asia.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    106. Re:So an American hero might be jailed for life by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      I'd say 1) is a perfect time to mention even a broken clock is right two times a day.

      Argh. A stopped clock is right twice a day, assuming it's a conventional 12-hour clock.

      A broken clock can be wrong all the time. For example, assuming a 12-hour dial clock, consider if both hands have come loose and are now pointing directly at the 6. That is not a valid representation of 12-hour time. For any given position of the hour hand, there is one and only one correct position of the minute hand.

      The minute hand does not carry any addition information - it's simply helpful for obtaining a more-precise reading over a relatively imprecise analog channel (called "glancing at the clock").

      Really, it's like some of the people who post here don't even care about technical specifications.

  2. So I guess the Russians got all they could. by mmell · · Score: 1

    "Da, tvarish Trump, we are through with him now. Is for your amusement now."

  3. Re: OOhhhhhh by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

    snowden can buy us lunch then happy hour.

  4. Snowden shouldn't worry...we're a democracy by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    That said, I should add that the USA isn't like those other countries that do things outside the law.

    Snowden should rest assured that all will be just fine.

    I must add that sources like these remind me of events leading to how USA handled matters related to Saddam's "weapons of mass destruction."

    We all know how that went, don't we?

  5. both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Clinton had won the election, it wouldn't be a better situation. She was also strongly opposed to the disclosure.

    In practice we have no more 4th amendment in the United States and should repeal it officially rather than having the law on the books, and ignoring it utterly.

    Also, if I were Snowden, I'd sure be working damned fucking hard on a way to take up residence in Iceland or some friendly, freedom-oriented jurisdiction. He's in Russia only until that's no longer convenient for the Russians. If he ever ends up back in the US again via choice or otherwise, he's going to be "made an example of". I don't think he can even depend on the average American to do the right thing here. Half of all of them are glad to throw out freedoms in exchange for (empty) promises of security.

    Take care of yourself Ed. Lots of people are glad for what you did, but we can't help you against the full weight and PR-blitz the US govt can apply if they want to. Best thing for you to do is get the fuck out of anyplace that may hand you over.

    1. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If Russia is planning on handing Snowden over, I highly doubt that they would give him the opportunity to flee.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dude sealed his own fate when he let himself be seduced by Putin. You know - the guy that murders journalists and political opponents.

      Putin will give up Snowden when he's no longer useful. Giving him back to the US is sure to cause a whole shitstorm of controversy and political chaos, which is Russia's end-game anyway. Dropping Snowden back in Trump's lap along with some sweet words will further push the notion that Trump is in Russia's pocket and will undermine his administration.

      Keep in mind that Trump getting elected was the failure. All that happens now is consequences.

    3. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Half of all of them are glad to throw out freedoms in exchange for (empty) promises of security

      You realise those same security services protected your country and the entire Western world during the Cold War, don't you? Personally I happen to think they went too far but the fact of the matter is we've had signals intelligence since World War I and its saved our bacon many times since then. The only thing that's changed is the source of the signals. I would be very circumspect at applauding a traitor willing to spill the country's secrets to the media like that. I'm sure both he and the Guardian journalists involved thought they were in a Bourne film. Shame their left-wing rag is losing £90m a year.

    4. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You realise those same security services protected your country

      It's fine to have a national intelligence service.

      It's not fine to turn it inward on its own population, Stasi style.

      It's not fine to use "parallel construction" and have the government lie about the nature of evidence it presents against people.

      The NSA violated the highest law of the land on a vast scale, as a matter of policy, and thus has lost its legitimacy as a public institution. That fact needed to be made clear to the people.

    5. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      the guy that murders journalists and political opponents

      He does that himself? At least in the US, the president has some aides to do the daily dirty work.

    6. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude sealed his own fate when he let himself be seduced by Putin. You know - the guy that murders journalists and political opponents.

      Hmmmm.

      Seduced by Putin? or...

      Here's a place that'll have me with no extradition treaty with the US.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Falconhell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Gaurdian loses a lot less then news corp, they lost over $400 million Australian this year.
      Funny how you RWNJ call a balaced source a left wing rag becaiuse it doesnt lie and pander to your desire for alternative facts.
      The traitore are the cowards of the right, who have allowed our freedoms to be taken away by their fascist heroes, when you are more likely to die falling out of bed than by terrorism. Gutless loudmouthed trash.

    8. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

      you have to understand, russia is not yet as wealthy as the US.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Are you actually calling committing industrial espionage against allies protecting them?
      Anyways it looks like the Russians have made a great comeback in the cold war and now have their puppet in the Presidency along with the pro-Russian party in the other branches. I guess it's OK with you as long as it's the authoritarian Fascists instead of the authoritarian Commies.
      Me, I plain old don't like authoritarians and my freedom has been threatened more by the right, who would gladly throw me in jail for a joint, which has, in my life, been personified by the USA and their democracy of giving a choice between Pepsi and Coke, or, this crook or the other crook.
      As for Snowden, I'm not aware of any amendments to the US Constitution that override the 1st, which didn't come with any exceptions for Congress to pass laws to illegalize speech, not even for national security and being an amendment, overrides earlier parts of the Constitution.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    10. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Fragnet · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you actually calling committing industrial espionage against allies protecting them?

      All intelligence services have been doing that since forever. I'm really not sure why that surprises you. With respect to the Constitution, the security services are necessarily somewhat outside of the law. They have to be in order to function.

      I'm not aware of any amendments to the US Constitution that override the 1st

      You can sign away your first amendment rights, especially if you work for the security services. How would they operate otherwise?

      my freedom has been threatened more by the right

      Fascinating. It isn't the Right running around campus shutting down free speech with violent protests. It's the regressive left.

    11. Re: both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody could be convicted based upon evidence the NSA obtained so it doesn't really matter.

    12. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by naubol · · Score: 2

      Did it ever occur to you, oh pea brained little oik, that the reason terrorist acts are relatively rare is because the security services are busy 24/7 trying to prevent attacks?

      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? The constitution says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Do you believe that we should be willing to shred our basic law in order to protect against terrorists? The NSA appears to have systematically ignored the constitution. The necessity of which to protect against terrorists is not obvious, the amount it helped is not really known generally, and the dangers to our future when such vast information gathering is in the hands of people we should not trust too thoroughly is also unqualifiable.

      What makes you unpersuasive is your certainty that you have the answer to these concerns. Yes, I've considered your perspective. Maybe you should give credit to the idea that there are other perspectives that warrant more consideration than your exasperated "good grief" suggests you've given them.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    13. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by naubol · · Score: 1

      I'm not for the regressive left; many on the left, like me, are quite concerned about their antics. It is possible to hold this idea and still think the antics on the right are more regressive or dangerous to freedom.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    14. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Informative

      He wasn't trying to go to Russia, he got stuck there. It was an accident.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American "Left Wing" is anyone who thinks it is cheaper to pay for housing and education subsidies for free citizens vs locking them in prison and doing the same, at a higher price and lower quality.

    16. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He wasn't trying to go to Russia, he got stuck there. It was an accident.

      More to the point, we stuck him there. After his travel documents were revoked, he couldn't go anywhere else. He is precisely where we apparently wanted him.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      It's fine to have a national intelligence service.

      It's not fine to turn it inward on its own population, Stasi style.

      It's not fine to use "parallel construction" and have the government lie about the nature of evidence it presents against people.

      The NSA violated the highest law of the land on a vast scale, as a matter of policy, and thus has lost its legitimacy as a public institution. That fact needed to be made clear to the people.

      Yes, yes, yes! NSA internal-US shenanigans are Stasi-style. "Parallel Construction" is a crime. The NSA should be gutted, abandoned, and a new organization with the actual, core task be re-created. And not populated by ex-NSA management.

      I'd mod up, but this thread is closed for mods, but I just wanted to emphasize your concise statement.

    18. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      He wasn't trying to go to Russia, he got stuck there. It was an accident.

      More to the point, we stuck him there. After his travel documents were revoked, he couldn't go anywhere else. He is precisely where we apparently wanted him.

      EXACTLY. The US took away any other options for him, and effectively pushed him into having to choose Russia, a non-extradition country.

      What Snowden does there, I have no idea. Nor do I care – because the US forced him to go there. It is bad for US security, almost undoubtedly, but the US government created the stupid situation, and we US citizens might pay some price for it, thanks to our own government's departmental overreach for power.

      The checks and balances are not working. But how do we reform them?

    19. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm of the same mind; left, and I believe there's very little hope in republican politicians. Which is why democrat politicians fucking up so badly concerns me more: if the party that pretends to hold my ideals can't put out a good candidate, then in my view, we're fucked.

    20. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to peace-loving Obama, who murdered innocent civilians with drone raids EVERY FUCKING WEEK for eight fucking years !
      700 bombs a day.
      The Americans, regardless of party affiliation, are terrorists, murderers, thieves and liars.
      Don't go pointing fingers at your demon-de-jour, unless you're going to document american murders too.
      Fucking ignorant saps ...

      Snowden wasn't "seduced" by anyone, he was put on the DIE SOON list by Obama, and faced with that, you go to the only place that the Americans can't - and that just happens to be Russia ... where would you go?

    21. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Snowden wasn't "seduced" by anyone, he was put on the DIE SOON list by Obama, and faced with that, you go to the only place that the Americans can't - and that just happens to be Russia ... where would you go?

      I'll certainly go to hell if any of the major religious theories are on target, but if that's the case, I'm sure I'll know a fair number of the people there.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    22. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The checks and balances are not working. But how do we reform them?

      The American public has to care. If the public doesn't care, nothing can be done.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Epic fail there Fraggy, the security services have always been trying to prevent terrorism, and are quick to report their successes, few though they are.
      You know how you beat terrorism? By not allowing yourself to be scared, only the most pathetic cowards are scared of something that is less likely than dying falling out of bed, or being struck by lightning.
      The stupid oik is you man, in fact cowadly stupid oik seems appropriate.

    24. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      You know how you beat terrorism? By not allowing yourself to be scared

      This is quite the most hilariously stupid sentence I've read on slashdot all week. And that's up against some pretty stiff competition.

    25. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The immediate goal of terrorism is terror, which means that it fails as a strategy if it doesn't scare anyone. It's an attempt to leverage a little power into a lot of influence. If the target population isn't scared, terrorism fails, and is less likely to be used.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      More to the point, we stuck him there. After his travel documents were revoked, he couldn't go anywhere else.

      This is something I do not understand. Passports and such are just rules. Governments break their own rules all the time. Why wouldn't they be able to break a rule about documents? Who would enforce the rule?

      For example, let's say Iceland wanted to offer Snowden sanctuary or whatever. Why would they necessarily care if America has revoked Snowden's travel documents? Those are not Icelandic documents. Iceland could let him in just as easily as Russia did.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    27. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The immediate goal of terrorism is terror, which means that it fails as a strategy if it doesn't scare anyone.

      No, the immediate goal of terrorism is to scare people to comply with what you want.

      You can succeed in scaring people but the strategy still fails if the scared people doesn't do what you want.

      Most recent example is the 2016 election cycle. Both sides used scare tactics, but only one side succeeded.

      Trump scared people about Mexicans and Muslims. People got scared and voted for Trump, which is what Trump wanted.

      Hillary scared people about Trump. Well, people were scare of Trump, but that didn't make them do what Hillary wanted (vote for her). People hated Hillary too, and either stayed home or voted 3rd party.

    28. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Some of us are not as gutless and pathetic as you. Ive never once bern scared of terrorism, given its vanishingly small threat.
      It seems gutlless oik describes you well.

    29. Re:both outcomes were hostile. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Exactlyl terrorism is ised by governments to extend their powers outrageously, andvpeople like gutless Fraggy cheer them along.

  6. Trump needs to fire all internal enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Made up, accurate, or exaggerated intelligence information leaked to a "news" organization with known political ties. The senior analyst doesn't belong on the job.

    1. Re:Trump needs to fire all internal enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't get them all at once.
      He's set several traps for ppl leaking news now. And fired them when caught.

    2. Re:Trump needs to fire all internal enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we need some good political purges. Fill is inner circle with sycophants and yes men (even more). This will just hasten the death spiral and we'll get the loser out of office before Q1 is up, well ahead of schedule.

      You trumpettes are your own worst enemy.

    3. Re:Trump needs to fire all internal enemies by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that a Nation State did try to influence the American election, but it is most unfortunate that the Nation State guilty of this offense against Americans is America.

      Now its quite a broad brush to say that "our government" tried to influence the election, when really it was just certain influential members of it. There is a faction of our government that even thinks that its OK to use the IRS to influence elections, and this factions also has some editorial control over significant portions of the main stream media who are themselves more than eager to allow it.

      Sometimes the main stream media makes a mistake and has an actual journalist on. The outcome is not good for the bottom line narrative.

      The Democrat party was just wiped out. They didnt just miss the Presidency, and any House/Senate control. They got wiped out in State Houses and Governors Mansions country-wide also. The main stream media is not talking about how the Democrats just got wiped out because the Pelosi's and the Cumming's don't want a party revolution. Most of the survivors are the dirtiest of them all, they are not giving up control of the party, and they have all the influence necessary to make sure of it.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  7. What? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Obama wanted him prosecuted as well.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:What? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Today I learned prosecuted = executed.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does in a case of treason. That's what Obama, Trump, and many others would like to try him for. It helps that contractors do not fall under the umbrella of whistleblower laws.

    3. Re:What? by geek · · Score: 1

      Today I learned prosecuted = executed.

      Being prosecuted for treason = execution. You're just splitting hairs. At least Trump states it up front, Obama couldn't say what he meant if his life depended on it.

    4. Re:What? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Leaving aside the fact that prosecuted for treason doesn't necessarily mean executed, I don't recall Obama ever calling what Snowden did "Treason". Given Manning wasn't, there's little or no reason to suppose the Obama regime would have charged him with treason, still less executed.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:What? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't, lots of people have been convicted of treason and not executed. It is not mandatory. Not sure where you get that idea from.

    6. Re:What? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Being prosecuted for treason = execution.

      No it doesn't. Do some googling before you make yourself look stupid next time.

  8. Re:Called it. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    From your lips to God's ear.

    But we'd better grab Soros junior, too. He's as bad as his father.

    I think Snowden should be released with no charges once he's back here.

  9. Putin is throwing his pet POTUS a treat by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Need I say more?

    1. Re:Putin is throwing his pet POTUS a treat by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Nah. It's Snowden's own decision. It turned out that the Russian political asylum health insurance does not cover the gender change surgery.

    2. Re:Putin is throwing his pet POTUS a treat by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add a 'drum hit' at the end of your comment, friend.

    3. Re:Putin is throwing his pet POTUS a treat by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Oh and by the way I charge a small fee for being someones' straight-man; the first one's on the house, any after this is a buck per straight-line.

  10. In like a lamb, out like a lion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TIME TO MARCH ON WASHINGTON??

  11. Outlived his usefulness by shanen · · Score: 1

    This was so obvious even before the enthronement ceremony that I'm shocked even Slashdot regards it as news. (I'm being told you Americans prefer the obscure terminology "inauguration" for some silly reason?)

    Snowden was merely a target of opportunity that Putin seized upon to embarrass that Obama fellow. Apparently still regarded him as some sort of worthy adversary or some such. Now that America's democracy has been hoisted upon its own petards, Snowden has certainly outlived his usefulness.

    Then again, perhaps Putin shouldn't count too heavily on his buddy-buddy relationship? I'm believing the reports of #PresidentTweety's increasingly erratic behavior. Maybe he'll go nuts and trigger the 25th even before he has a REAL presidential crisis? Snowden might be a more valuable chip if saved for Pence?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Outlived his usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has always been an inauguration of president of a republic before Donald, the Golden Calf, was anointed.

  12. July by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump tweeted the "execution" judgment in July. Not defending him, but it was twitter, before election, and Trump has said a lot of outrageous shit on twitter.

    1. Re: July by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The President has indeed said some pretty outrageous stuff on Twitter. It is unbecoming of the office he holds. I can't imagine the reaction if Snowden was sent back to the US. Clearly he would get no fair trial, mostly because the Administration have clearly decreed he's gonna be made an example of, and will be unable to present evidence of being a whistleblower in court.

      Of course there's always Jury Nullification. But I can't ever count on my fellow Americans to ever do the right thing.

    2. Re: July by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Twitter is unbecoming of the office, but Trump didn't initiate presidential tweeting.

  13. Next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden is literally "bagged" and flown to the US, right on the white house's doorstep.

  14. US Disinformation? by mbone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't pass the smell test.

    One thing that the Russians (and, for that matter, the Americans) understand well is protecting people who turn to their side. If the Russians send Snowden back, it will be a long time before they get another actual defector* to come out of the cold.

    * Snowden is not a defector.

    1. Re:US Disinformation? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correct, you don't just burn an asset* for no reason. You do it because it gains you an advantage, such as to protect a much bigger asset - such as the suggestions that this is meant to distract from scandals about pro-Russian influence in Trump's advisors. It becomes a cost-benefit analysis of whether they think what they get out of it is worth the questions it raises in the minds of future defectors/spies/etc.

      http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/10/...
      http://www.vox.com/world/2017/...

      *Regardless of what we think of Snowden or his motives or his actions, this is how Putin/Russian intelligence will look at him.

    2. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than that, giving him back to the wolves would mean the prosecution of him could be construed as an admission of guilt. He did steal state secrets and he did hand them off to reporters and he is not being prosecuted for those things.

      It's win win win, what do you do with a condom when you're done with it?

      Save it for later?

    3. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an obvious "fake news" story by the democrats to raise concerns over Trump administration possibly recommending "executing" Snowden (an American hero).

    4. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his most recent interview Snowden claims he has not turned to their side. And he claims he never intend to end up in Russia, but found he had little alternative. Kiddies these days don't know history and admire Putin. Unlike Snowden Russia will be their end goal.

    5. Re:US Disinformation? by Kagato · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to turn him over right away. Wait until the US has some Russian Spies then do a swap. Snowden was always going to get fucked by the Russians. And frankly he was an idiot for trying to go to Cuba via Russia. The state department was even dumber revoking his passport. You see flights to Cuba from Moscow run directly over the United States East Coast. They would have demanded the flight land and pulled him off the flight.

    6. Re:US Disinformation? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It might be that the Russians think Snowden has more info he hasn't shared with them. So far the stuff they got was mostly just about illegal monitoring that was embarrassing but not all that harmful. Maybe they're trying to scare him into spilling more info. If he was a real spy there's no way they could give him back as that would preclude anyone else running to them. However, if he's just a hero trying to stop the evil NSA from illegal acts then they lose nothing by tossing him back.

    7. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need more credible news sources than the Clinton News Network and Liberal Fox.

    8. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the matter that it is a considered a crime against humanity/war crime. That hasn't stopped either country in a long while.

    9. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if Snowden is an "asset" (he is not collaborating directly with Russian intel AFAIK), but he is a top-profile international figure who has sought and been granted asylum, which in many (perhaps most) parts of the world is seen as political asylum. Protecting Snowden from legal and illegal prosecution by U.S. forces not only provides Russian intelligence with a source to spy on but also gives Russia much needed prestige in large portions of the world including Western countries. (Yes, the U.S. is viewed as an empire by many, many people in all parts of the world to whom Snowden is a hero even if they have only a vague idea of who he is or what he did.) If Russia handed Snowden over to the U.S. they would not only burn their invonluntary source (or their asset if he is talking to them, which I doubt), they would also commit an outrageous act that would guarantee not only worldwide diplomatic condemnation but also that no other high-profile whistlebowers from any country on the planet would ever seek asylum in Russia again, potentially burning countless other possible sources and "assets."

    10. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need more credible news sources than the Clinton News Network and Liberal Fox.

      Kindly suggest some. But I suspect you have your head so far up your ass, we won't hear what you say.

    11. Re: US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An american hero! Now thats funny. Hes a traitor.

    12. Re: US Disinformation? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      Then how did he board a plane to Russia without a visa?

    13. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It might be that the Russians think Snowden has more info he hasn't shared with them

      It is well known that maybe as little as 10% or at most 20% of the information Snowden acquired has been made available.

      Where that other 80+% is, is anyone's guess. The US government would like people to believe that it has all been destroyed.

    14. Re:US Disinformation? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Very much this. And, unlike the US, the Russians know how to handle human intelligence sources and make good use of them. It is unlikely though that they got anything from Snowden, and they may not even have tried. Snowden copied far too much data to know even a tiny fraction of it himself and he did not have it with him when he stranded in Russia.

      Of course, the "alternate facts" crowd will create any amount of "fake news" to obscure these rather obvious facts as they do not fit their fantasy-world.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re:US Disinformation? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And fail. You protect a source at all cost as long as it does not turn on you or does something obviously stupid. Because if you do not, you will lose all your other sources and will not get any new ones. Spycraft 101. There is no advantage great enough to outweigh that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re: US Disinformation? by gweihir · · Score: 5, Informative

      He did not plan to enter Russia at all and was stuck in international territory for quite a while as a result. Russia (unlike the US) accepts international law, so you can change planes at an international airport in Russia without entering the country.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone thinks they would just give him back I have a one of these to sell you. http://www.fleetfarm.com/detai...

      Snowden is a minor annoyance in russia. He has said so himself. However, Russia has a long history of looking bad in pretty much all aspects. Keeping Snowden makes them look slightly good. It really at this point is his only bargaining chip.

      He did a majorly bad thing. He knows it. He is cool with that. I have watched the interviews. He has made it 'good' in his mind. What he also did was show that our own organizations are not doing good things. They regularly fail to follow our constitution and the 'channels' to correct it do not work at all. He didnt reveal anything that our foes didnt already know. The only people who didnt know was the American people. The only ones who suspected were called conspiracy theorists. Now all I ask is he comes back and gets a fair trial. That is it. A *fair* trial. It will also probably be a trial where he is convicted of breaking the law. Because he did. He will then spend a long time in jail. Anyone who thinks different is deluding themselves.

    18. Re: US Disinformation? by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Russia (unlike the US) accepts international law

      Except for some of that pesky esoteric shit like territorial integrity or chemical weapons.

    19. Re:US Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does this distract from Russian puppet rumours? It directly feeds into it.

  15. Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I feel confident in my hunch that president Trump isn't versed in ancient literature, so I hope someone reminds him of Virgil's quote:

    "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts"

    Anything Russia offers up as a gift should be viewed with some strong skepticism. Back during the late cold war, there was an excessive amount of anti-soviet paranoia. Now, it seems that there isn't enough...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re: Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if the Russkies send Snowden back we should x-ray him to be sure he isn't stuffed full of KGB agents.

    2. Re:Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel confident in my hunch that president Trump isn't versed in ancient literature, so I hope someone reminds him of Virgil's quote:

      "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts"

      Beware of females bearing gifts.

      There, FTFY.

    3. Re:Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Virgil wrote The Iliad? who knew.... :-)

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    4. Re:Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgil wrote The Iliad? who knew.... :-)

      Nope, he wrote the Aeneid - check out Book 2 paragraph 49, "Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes" in Latin.

  16. Well fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A senior US official said so. That's good enough for me. Run it as if it was 100% true on Friday at 5pm. Great journalism guys.

  17. FAKE NEWS FROM US MEDIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be treated as fake news until confirmed by the Russian government. US intelligence is known to lie (e.g., WMDs, Clapper/Obama, etc..) just as much as the MSM.

  18. Re:But first hang him but his NUTZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hang you by yours, but you they're obviously too small to wrap any rope around.

  19. As an American I am outraged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too am American. Baseball and rock and roll! How could the west led by Obama allow USA to send Snowden to Russian and then say its bad for country? This is fake news at most!

  20. FAKE NEWS by rholtzjr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Already been confirmed as fake news. Look where it is coming from. His residency has already been extended to the year 2020. And spokespeople for Russia have already stated "Nonsense"

    1. Re:FAKE NEWS by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where in that linked to article does it "confirm" that this is fake news? Why would Russian spokesmen validate something Russia is only considering?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:FAKE NEWS by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      And spokespeople for Russia have already stated "Nonsense"

      Right... because Russia is so credible.

      Claims that Russian forces entered Ukraine 'complete rubbish,' Russia says

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:FAKE NEWS by mmell · · Score: 0

      I suspect rholtzjr ( 928771 ) was trying to be sardonic. Either that, or he needs to lay off the acid. Actually, I'm not sure which.

    4. Re:FAKE NEWS by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Are you questioning the credibility of our glorious everlasting Russian Allies who stood with us against the evil Germans and since have remained our best friends?
      Off to the reeducation camps for you.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    5. Re:FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right, because countries never kick out people with residency and spokespeople for countries are always honest; especially russian ones. please, please tell me you didn't reproduce...

    6. Re:FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comorade you have served your country well. For this you will get free packet of snowdens.

    7. Re:FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he did. He f*cked your mama. Oh wait, now this is awkward.....

  21. Re:Called it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're going to grab george soros and hand him to putin in exchange for snowden who will get yelled at and then pardoned.

    A nazi dies in russia. Everyone else wins. Everyones happy.

    That is a hateful, slanderous lie. You should be ashamed of yourself. The smear campaign is entirely fabricated with no basis in reality. Soros wasn't even old enough to join the Nazis. Get your ridiculous, ill-informed, slander out of here. You need mental help.

  22. They might but not as a gift. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they do this, it wouldn't be to "curry favor" with Trump, it would be a move to further destabilize the US. As a result of multiple factors (including Russian interference) we have a the most unpopular president in a century who is extremely divisive. Returning Snowden would be a move to stoke those flames and cause more unrest. There are many reasons for doing this but ultimately, a less stable US is better for their own nation.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush Jr won narrowly and only because he avoided a recount in one county. This did not stop him from starting an unpopular war (that was by the way planned by him even before his election, as was made clear by his campaign speech for the army)

    2. Re:They might but not as a gift. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Good call. Reminiscent of the time Germany let Lenin out of jail and sent him back to Russia, just to mess with the country. What could have gone wrong?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:They might but not as a gift. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Russia first, natch.

      This is the reality of the alpha male fantasy bullshit. You don't come out on top, everyone else just fucks you over. Cooperation and diplomacy are always the better option.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:They might but not as a gift. by timholman · · Score: 1

      If they do this, it wouldn't be to "curry favor" with Trump, it would be a move to further destabilize the US.

      The most insightful statement in this discussion.

      Snowden is not an "asset", as he was never a spy for Russia. By now Russian intelligence has long since squeezed any information of value out of Snowden. There's hardly any need for Putin to keep him in Russia, and his value as a propaganda asset is fading.

      But the impact of the protests over Trump are not lost on Putin. Returning Snowden without asking for the lifting of sanctions will feed the "Trump is in cahoots with Russia" meme, and make things that much more difficult for the U.S. government.

      It would be a smart move, and Putin is no fool.

    5. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame the Germans for everything that ever went wrong in history, it's getting very old, and it's not even true.

      Russia would have been fucked either way Communists or not since they for some reason are utterly incapable to find some kind of leader who isn't a complete and utter psychotic lunatic. It could probably be argued that the leadership they had during the post Stalin Soviet era was among the sanest they have ever had, even going back to before there even was a "Russia". Insane, psychotic leadership is a proud Russian tradition to the extent that you could probably argue that in the long run, the net would have been less human suffering if the rest of the world had just sat down and let Hitler exhaust himself and wipe out Russia, and then deal with the Germans, because the Russians are historically so royally screwed that to them, the appalling is the normal. I doubt they can ever get out of the hole history has dug them into.

    6. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      If they do this, it wouldn't be to "curry favor" with Trump, it would be a move to further destabilize the US. As a result of multiple factors (including Russian interference) we have a the most unpopular president in a century who is extremely divisive. Returning Snowden would be a move to stoke those flames and cause more unrest. There are many reasons for doing this but ultimately, a less stable US is better for their own nation.

      Yes. Geopolitics is a chess game.

      But also, Putin has stated that "there is only one superpower" in the world. Also that Russia wants to be a nation that works and trades with other nations. Putin most definitely does not want another Cold War.

      They have some things to fix first. But let's at least leave the door open...

    7. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      But also, Putin has stated that "there is only one superpower" in the world.

      Putin says a lot of things.

      Putin most definitely does not want another Cold War.

      That must explain why he invaded Ukraine.

      They have some things to fix first. But let's at least leave the door open...

      Even if he has the purest of intentions, returning Snowden would make the US less stable.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    8. Re:They might but not as a gift. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Russia has had, more or less, the usual mix. Peter the great vs. Ivan the terrible. Granting their system was FUBAR though the 20th century.

      Henry the 8th wasn't exactly sane and stable. Hell most leaders of more than a couple of centuries ago were pretty close to Hitler. If they had movie cameras in Charlemagne's time, he would be grouped with Pol Pot, Stalin and Hitler. To say nothing of the various genocidal popes.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:They might but not as a gift. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nobody bluffs in chess. Geopolitics is poker.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Putin most definitely does not want another Cold War.

      That must explain why he invaded Ukraine.

      They have some things to fix first. But let's at least leave the door open...

      Even if he has the purest of intentions, returning Snowden would make the US less stable.

      Crimea was for access to the Black Sea, so they could run a direct oil pipeline to Western Europe without incurring fees and such from Ukraine. Putin wants profits for Gazprom. A war would result in things that prevent that, so I don't think that he wants a big war, such as Cold War II. Russia is rich with oil, and they want access to the markets.

      And I wasn't speaking about "pure intentions". I can't read minds. As HornWumps corrected me below, Geopolitics is poker, not chess. And it's definitely not charity.

    11. Re:They might but not as a gift. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      And I wasn't speaking about "pure intentions". I can't read minds

      Then why should anyone give them a chance at all if there endgame is just money and power?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    12. Re:They might but not as a gift. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      most leaders of more than a couple of centuries ago were pretty close to Hitler. If they had movie cameras in Charlemagne's time, he would be grouped with Pol Pot, Stalin and Hitler.

      So true.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Trump does it again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump manages to do something just in three weeks that started with Obama and never managed to finish it in the past three years.

  24. It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're looking at Snowden, but there will be a quid-pro-quo deal, in exchange Trump will lift sanctions against Russia as fake reward for sending over Snowden. The real purpose here is to have an excuse to lift sanctions for Trump to sell to the GOP, not for Snowden.

    Once again, please be clear here, Trump did a deal with Putin and it's worth more to Putin that Trump blocking Cyber security bills, attacking NATO, and removing the military from the National Security Council. Putin will get trade sanctions lifted and everything else besides in exchange Trump will get hacking help in the next election.

    Can I remind you of some of my other predictions.... namely 6 eyes, Russia added to 5 eyes on excuse of fighting ISIS? Or Iran attacked to force them over to Russia, giving Russia effective control of the region.... that one is also in progress.

    1. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Putin and his colleges completely and totally outsmarted greed driven US defence industries and the scam they were pushing. The planned for the sanctions and for Russia they worked fantastically. Basically the Russian government was able to cut off supply of imported product whilst continuing to export energy, without the Russian public complaining about the lack of European goods. In that time Russians were weaned off imported product and became accustomed to locally produced product and development of locally produced product grew enormously. They were also able to substantially increase importation of South American product and build strong ties there. They are quite content for the sanctions to continue whilst they continue to export energy.

      Likelihood of Russia handing over Snowden, somewhere in the very large negative numbers, they want more Snowden not less, especially now. Russia knows their networks are hacked and the volume of misinformation flowing across them would be huge. Computers are really good at generating empty data and all sorts of crap to entice US knob heads would be flowing and every time some idiots leak, Russia knows what bit of the network was hacked.

      When it comes to intelligence agencies by far the bulk of data flowing would by honey pots and misinformation, it makes logical sense. How much crap should be produced compared to real data, something 1,000 pieces of crap for each bit of real data and 99% of that should lead to honey pots. The Russians are likely laughing the tits off right now.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re: It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an AC, like me. You have also predicted aliens, kangaroo hats on the pop, Linux on the desktop, cold fusion, carrots that taste like chocolate, and your getting laid without paying for it.

    3. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not just a trade. Putin has dirt on Trump. Any exchange is just for show, to help Trump save face and sell it, not because he is a great negotiator.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if that deal was done *before* he took the oath of office, even if they (trump or his 'people' and the russians) just 'talked' about it.. that is grounds for getting his orange ass thrown right out of office (if the republican congresscritters had any spine, that is)... SOO fucking illegal.

    5. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Not quite true. The sanctioned products still enter the Russian market - via Belarus, where the products get relabeled as local produce and then resold to Russia at a premium.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Putin and his colleges

      He has more in common with Trump every day.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Can I remind you of some of my other predictions.... namely 6 eyes, Russia added to 5 eyes on excuse of fighting ISIS? Or Iran attacked to force them over to Russia, giving Russia effective control of the region.... that one is also in progress.

      Yes because, well, they are neighbors after all. Only 50 miles of land separates them at their closest point. They also share a sea.

    8. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1,000 pieces of crap for each bit of real data

      If they want help with that, any American car company could teach them how to make 1,000 pieces of crap for each good one.

    9. Re: It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet we don't know the difference between your and you're.

    10. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia is turning into nothing more than a 3rd world country with a nuclear arsenal. And that arsenal is effectively neutralized by the US arsenal. The state of California has a higher GDP than Russia and the California National Guard can field a more effective conventional military force. And if you paid attention when Obama sanctioned them before he left office. He booted 30+ Russian diplomats and closed two locations being used by Russian Intelligence agencies in a very public manner. The two locations that got shutdown were not selected randomly. The Russians probably thought their activities at these locations were not compromised. It's unfortunate that we may never know what type of private sanctions were assessed. Why do people continue to operate under the impression that the US is weak or more vulnerable by Russia or even China? The trick is keeping the true US capabilities under cover until they are needed for something important. The Russians do not have the choice of hiding their capabilities because they are determined to some how make the world think they deserve to sit at the grownups table when it comes to international cock fighting. Obama and Trump have successfully got Russia stuck in Syria without any end in sight. The US now has the power to force oil prices down so low that Russian's main source of hard currency evaporates. The Russians are currently bleeding money with the current prices. The current price is only about half the amount needed to meet Russian budgetary needs while their oligarchs access to international currency markets are being hamstrung by the current sanctions leveled against them for their invasion of the Ukraine. The Ukraine is another conflict with no end in sight as it continues to cost Russia even more money to maintain their support in the conflict. I Russia isn't careful they could end up a Chinese client state in the not so distant future. So tell me again how Russia has any power over the US at the moment. Floating the idea of sending Snowden home is just an attempt to some how get the US to unwind at least some of the sanctions they are drowning in? Or maybe they want more US involvement in Syria so they can make a quick exit out the back door and declare themselves victors?

    11. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Can I remind you of some of my other predictions....

      No. You are an Anonymous Coward. You have predicted everything from the fall of Rome to the splitting of the Moon. You have no history. You have no future. You have no reputation. While occasionally, deep words of wisdom are indeed uttered by you, they are one-time things and in no way related to any other things that you have said.

      In short, if you want your predictions to have ANY chance of having any meaning, create an account.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is weak.
      Russians were always a poor people living hard, with a horrible climate and horrible geography and under horrible circumstances.
      They are used to living tough, they make the best of the least. That's what makes them stronger as a people,
      and a dumb idiocracy like USA a weak nation. You people get butthurt about the stupidest of shit and are used to comfort and wealth.
      Comfort and wealth tend to be as bad as they are good, in that they corrupt your people and turn them into idiots with princess complexes as much as they provide advancement.

      If USA ever invaded Russia, not only would it be stuck in the geography and against such a tough people,
      it would go into a financial crises and a social crisis faster and more horribly than Vietnam and all of the Middle East fuckups combined.
      And Russia? They won't feel shit because they are used to living in a perpetual crisis.
      There's where you fail Jimmy.

    13. Re: It's SANCTIONS not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used it correctly the first time.

  25. Re: The American thing to do by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    I have found that the American thing to do is to pretend to care about your fellow man while possessing no such interest, which is why disabled people are treated so bad, and I am unAmerican for pointing it out.

  26. Re:Breaking thing by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Considering the ends of "things", breaking things sounds good.

  27. Re: Fun game by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Under the Constitution only books have rights... or imaginary creatures or something-something... Rats!

  28. Re:The makings of an American hero by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I don't know, considering the characteristics of the fictional character billed "The Greatest American Hero".

  29. A bullshit story. by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The two sources are both from the US intelligence -- the same intelligence community that sold us the debunked "Russia hacked the US election" story. The same intelligence community that The Intercept reports as being increasingly powerful political actors and manipulators in the US, and that The Intercept reported as having an interest in undermining the democratically-elected Trump administration, and by extension the democratic process itself.

    All the other parties involved -- the US government, the Russian government, Edward Snowden & friends -- deny the story.

    There are no other sources other than the US intelligence, and they have a recent history of lying for political reasons. They're not credible sources. Plainly, it's bullshit.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
    1. Re:A bullshit story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the same intelligence community that sold us the debunked "Russia hacked the US election" story."

      bahahahah! you do realize this isn't /r/The_Donald, right?

      go stroke it on 8chan, cripple.

    2. Re:A bullshit story. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You belong on Infowars where you and the other crazies can stroke each other off.

    3. Re:A bullshit story. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      If you dont think the MSM is pushing a narrative and that the US intelligence agencies are the ones that handed them that narrative, then you are the crazy one.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:A bullshit story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's believe the administration, who coined the term "alternative facts" as a euphemism for lies along with a very tenuous relationship with reality, and the Russians, who have been an existential threat to the nation for the past 70 years. Look, you're either for us or against us.

      Captcha: Traitor

  30. Re: Fun game by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    So you slept through Constitutional Law.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  31. Russia Considers Sending Snowden Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. because ex-KGB agent Putin has gotten all the secret data he's going to get, and has grown fucking tired of this American hipster prima donna.

    FTFY

  32. Re: Slept? by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    Never been there. That's an odd place to take the conversation. Maybe something that should be taught in K-12 in America but isn't.

  33. HACKS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am Andrew Alan a hacker who has built a very good reputation and undeniably one of the best hackers you can come across.i have got access to hack into any account and also get to generate passwords for accounts like Facebook,Instagram,Twitter,gmail,yahoo mail,whats-app,we-chat,etc..I also have logins for bank like BOA,welsfargo,chase,credit union,capital one, and many other different banks for transfers and credit card top ups,Retrieving hacked social media accounts,clearing criminal records,increase credit scores,CC hack,hacking computer systems,Website hack,Catch hacker scammers,Phishing emails, that's to mention a few ... You can contact me on.......... andrewalanhacks@gmail.com or via text on +13238351741

  34. Re: Slept? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... should be taught in K-12 in America but isn't.

    Citation, please.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  35. Re: Losers by hackwrench · · Score: 0

    were born that surpassed even my idealsâ"the gundam pilots. Tradition appears blurred alongside their true feelings. From a historical point of view, warriors who have lost what they were protecting and were further betrayed by those they were protecting are losers. But they do not recognize themselves as such. Not only that, but they retain a strong will to continue fighting. The emotions of those who were thought to be beautiful are always full of sorrow, and honored tradition disappears in the cry of the weak. Winners of a battle will eventually decline in power and become losers, and then those âlosersâ(TM) will cultivate a new leader.

  36. Re: Citation by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    For the fact that Constitutional law isn't taught in America K-12? Either you are not an American or are way out of touch with reality. American schools barely touch on matters of law.

  37. No! Let the traitor rot in Russia! by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    Would much rather see him stuck in Russia forever than in a jail cell.

    1. Re:No! Let the traitor rot in Russia! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Would much rather see him stuck in Russia forever than in a jail cell.

      Trump is an enemy of the US and you're willfully aiding him. You're more a traitor than Snowden ever was.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. This is like when Vader gives Han Solo to Jabba by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    I just hope they freeze Snowden in carbonite and ship him by bounty hunter.

  39. Re: Citation by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Actually, I retract my challenge. I'm 71 years old and I don't see any evidence of quality education in America (at least by any Americans).

    Either you are not an American or are way out of touch with reality.

    Or maybe I'm referencing my generation.

    I concede your point.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  40. Re: Losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what drugs are you taking

  41. Re: Drugs by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    It's a drug called "Gundam Wing": http://www.oocities.org/televi...

  42. Lawless... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    That makes me think that maybe lawless meant something different when (if?) there was a time when many/most people knew much about law. Under the definition as I understand it not being lawless merely means that people try not to break whatever laws that may exist. Under that alternative definition, it seems the world is largely lawless at the moment. What comes of that...

  43. Re:Criminal... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    To clarify, the alternative definition being the one in the world where many/most know the law somewhat.
    But to the point of this addendum: I have long stopped caring and have conceded that I am a criminal. In the reality we find ourselves in, in order to be free, I believe that it is necessary to be a criminal. I also find it helps to be aware of that situation. I don't know how to rectify it.

  44. Re:Assange by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    Last I heard America took him for awhile then threw him back. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...

  45. Re: Botched the copy and paste by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I meant to start the copy after the sentence fragment that got included that referenced Gundams. Slashdot needs to fix its Unicode support. (among other things)

  46. BOFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deez nutz!

  47. Re: Crying by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Well if they stop, it will be more assuredly 8 instead of 4.

  48. Re: Breaking the law by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    So, what? So has everyone else. The law doesn't mean anything anymore.

  49. Big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean to tell me if you leak tons of info illegally and spit in people's faces you might have to face some consequences? Life is so unfair.

  50. Re: Botched the copy and paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad that future generations are quoting children's cartoons.

  51. As well you should be. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    As well you should. The day that children's cartoons don't contain anything worthy of quoting is the day we raise dumb kids. This has already happened quite a bit, but I haven't found the Gundam series I have watched to blame.

    1. Re: As well you should be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pro cannabis but you really need to put the bong down. Cartoons are entertainment. Not something to take too seriously as an adult.

  52. Re: Botched the copy and paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that collection of bullshit in the bible can last thousands of years, I say Gundam has a chance!

  53. Re: Breaking the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post-truth world --> Post-law world

  54. Re: Poor to be you... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Entertainment is the only thing to be taken seriously.

  55. propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    anonymous intelligence sources in the media is always manipulation.

  56. Fake news output on the rise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fakey fake fake fakery.....

  57. in Pokemon Go terms by kaur · · Score: 1

    Snowden == Ultra Ball.

  58. A Proper place to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is Uganda.

  59. Re: Botched the copy and paste by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    It's been on the todo list since 1999. They might get round to it by 2099.

  60. News, Russia causes further American chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia is kicking ass now

  61. lol by mijj · · Score: 1

    "US intelligence" .. hahahaha

  62. Gotta love intelligence agencies by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and the games they play.

    Let's put this story out there and see if we can get him to panic and / or introduce some suspicion to his relationship with the Russian government.

    If I were Team Snowden, I would respond with dusting off another, yet to be released, bombshell about what potentially illegal activities the NSA has been up to.

  63. How much is a Snowden worth, anyway? by supremebob · · Score: 1

    The rule on presidential gifts says that if the gift is worth more than something like $300, it has to go into the National Archive.

    Boy... I hope that they poke some air holes in the box that they store him in.

  64. Re: Poor to be you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why i take feminists seriously. They are a great source of entertainment.
    It's like looking at a rally of Westboro Baptist Church members, except you replace "fags" with "white males" on the signs,
    and you replace KKK costumes with vagina costumes (or topless with marker dribbles on the saggy breasts).

  65. Please don't. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Keep him. He is a traitor and it is better that he lives his life in Russia, China, or north Korea. In fact, Russia, if u are really done with him, send him to north korea or Somalia.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  66. I cannot imagine by Max_W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Edward being handed over to the US authorities. I think it would cause the third Russian revolution, a kind of Storming of the Bastille.

    Russian society gave to the world such great [real] freedom thinkers as Mikhail Bakunin, who has got quite a few followers nowadays.

  67. This site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has turned into Hillary dick ridingfest never so many snowflakes in one place

  68. Relax...there's probably nothing to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's from the "Nobody But Clinton" network.

    Like much of the stuff NBC shovels, it's probably completely baseless and all backed-up by "anonymous sources" who we can safely conclude do not exist given that these "news" agencies never seem to "out" their "anonymous sources" after those supposed sources are exposed as having been completely wrong.

    Consider:

    If you are a news agency and you have ACTUAL sources who demand anonymity in exchange for juicy stories and they repeatedly are shown to have lied to you and the stories based on their work have damaged your brand, why would you not expose them and tell everybody who these liars are??? A real anonymous source is only valuable and only deserving of identity protection if he is providing true information. Why would an agency protect the anonymity of fakers when that only encourages more fake "sources" to appear with more fake information? The protection of these sources only makes sense if the real secret is that there ARE no sources and the stuff is being made up by the journalists themselves.

  69. Re: OOhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, you're browsing at level0/-1, you deserve to know that modern Russia is a country governed by law and there is no way for them to send Snowden back to the US, nor do they plan to for that matter. This is bullshit made up by a few bs mainstrwam journalists wanting to fill their papers with bogus stories which was then taken up by other journalists who ran with it. Russia has nothing to gain from this whatsoever and frankly they don't give western "journalism" the time of day anymore. And again, Russia could not even if they wanted to, and they don't even have one court even half as corrupt and agenda driven as the 9th circuit

  70. Re: Poor to be you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take feminists seriously because there are more of them than of us
    Piss them off enough and you get juries that vote acquittal in every Loreena Bobbit case that comes along

    And even a would-be thug would know better than to go to sleep beside one of them once the Carving License is issued.

  71. so....which is he? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Snowden a principled brave American Hero(tm) standing up for "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" who exposed corruption as a service to the public who adore him etc?

    or

    Is Snowden a simpering coward who stole secrets he swore to protect and then ran off to Russia via China?

    There's a reason why he was willing to spill American secrets to non-American internet sites, and then bail out of the country to avoid the consequences rather than use the legal whistleblower processes and perhaps seek the protection of congress while staying in the US. It's also suspicious that Snowden, the supposed paragon of virtue, sought refuge first in a Marxist dictatorship and then in Putin's Russia. I thought the meme-of-the-day is that Trump is a puppet of uber-bad-guy Putin, and the fact that Trump wants a better relationship with Putin's Russia is proof that Trump is evil and must be driven from office. How is that consistent with Snowden as national hero being protected from evil US government by the benevolent Mr. Putin?????

    The political left in the US needs to discover a self-consistent narrative... the current messed-up and contradictory narrative provides little more than humerous entertainment.