Slashdot Mirror


Sprint's New Unlimited Plan Adds HD Streaming, Four Lines For $90 (zdnet.com)

Take that, Verizon! Sprint's unlimited data plan now has HD video too. From a report: On February 16, Sprint upped its unlimited plan, launching the "best unlimited HD plan ever", according to its press release. The new plan matches Verizon Wireless' new unlimited plan by offering unlimited calls, text, data, HD video streaming, and 10 GB of mobile hotspot for $22.50 per line, for four lines. That equates to $90 per month for four lines, or half of what Verizon Wireless is charging. Sprint's plan requires the account owner to enable AutoPay, ensuring the bill is paid on time each month. For those who don't need four lines, the first line will set you back $50 per month, two lines of service will bump it $90 per month.

54 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Competition is good! by rsborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks TMobile and Sprint for keeping the majors in line :)

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Competition is good! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yep...this is great.

      I'm on Verizon, and at Xmas I found I was about to run over my data, so I bumped it from 6-8GB...which was at $70/mo.

      I fired up the Verizon app on my iPhone and checked and switching from that to unlimited, actually saved me $5 a month...dropped me down to $65/mo for data.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Competition is good! by Jhon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Thanks TMobile and Sprint for keeping the majors in line :)"

      Yeah... it's a great price! But... it's Sprint.

    3. Re:Competition is good! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      I tried Sprint when I first moved to the SF Bay Area in 2001. Bad mistake -- even with this "bargain" I don't think I would ever go back Poor coverage, and they stuck me on this tiny little price plan and refused to offer me anything higher. After getting a cell bill for $700 I said eff it and left. Paying the early termination fee after only a couple months was far more affordable than continuing to use them

    4. Re:Competition is good! by butchersong · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sure this wasn't a paid posting... but ignoring that, this is just a promotional rate. "until the promotional pricing expires on March 31, 2018. After which pricing goes up to $160". Personally, I'd rather go with a straight forward tmobile plan.

    5. Re:Competition is good! by galabar · · Score: 1

      Damn those free markets to heck! ;)

    6. Re:Competition is good! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't get how they can charge for HD video though. Do they actively sabotage HD video streams if you don't pay.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Competition is good! by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I live in Las Vegas, And work in a lot of Towers and Casions.. I have sprint. Most of the time i can make or receive calls and use data with decent speed.. while others(t-mobile, verizon) have no service, or very slow intermittent service.

    8. Re:Competition is good! by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

      In Las Vegas in the early 2000's Sprint was decent, They merged with Nexttel and turned to garbage. As of the last 3 years or so they have become the best here.

    9. Re:Competition is good! by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this wasn't a paid posting... but ignoring that, this is just a promotional rate. "until the promotional pricing expires on March 31, 2018. After which pricing goes up to $160". Personally, I'd rather go with a straight forward tmobile plan.

      Is it just a contract rate offered for signups during that period? I'm too lazy to look, but my TMO Simple Choice plan prices are still honored for ongoing monthly charges and including the new-line rate - meaning I can add a new line for $10/mo and still pay the same rates I did when I signed up 4 years ago ($160 total for 10 lines excluding extras, all with 2.5GB base).

      So maybe this just means that Sprint will cease offering this pricing in 2018.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    10. Re:Competition is good! by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Most data is subject to throttling after you reach a usage threshold. Video streaming is completely unlimited; it won't get slowed down no matter how much you use. But it's also the first candidate to be dropped altogether if the network is congested.

    11. Re:Competition is good! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, +1 informative. Seems like you could do with some net neutrality.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Competition? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    WTF is going on! That's borderline unAmerican.

  3. Promotional Pricing by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA:

    ... until the promotional pricing expires on March 31, 2018. After which pricing goes up to $160 a month for the same four lines.

    Still not bad pricing for a year. Was just looking into switching away, this adds more weight to staying. Hope they improve their network soon, otherwise it won't be a price-based decision.

    1. Re:Promotional Pricing by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Mintsim's standard price for 5GB and unlimited voice/text is $299/year (+3% regulatory fees) or about $25/month. For four lines, that's 20GB. Their 2GB offering is $199 or $16.58/month per line, versus about 2.5GB per line to match that 10GB.

      You can do better than $22.50 per line.

    2. Re:Promotional Pricing by PeteTheHack · · Score: 1

      Staying? Why would you....As a loyal Sprint current customer, you DON'T GET this plan.......yoyu can't switch to it, only it's non-discounted version (for $160, as quoted above)....

    3. Re:Promotional Pricing by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Well, was already planning on switching to T-Mobile, if they don't give us the deal we want at Sprint we will continue with that plan. We're adding a line, which should be justification enough- at the local Sprint store they're pretty flexible. We're off contract so we can just walk away if we want to.

  4. 2 lines and 4 lines cost the same? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    2 lines and 4 lines cost the same? or do need to buy new 4 phones to get that price?

  5. What good is cheap data... by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    ...if you can't get to it? Sprint's coverage is crap compared to Verizon's.

  6. Uses CDMA. Do not want. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

    Sprint uses CDMA. No thank you. I like being able to buy my own Phones. GSM or GTFO.

    1. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Psst. You can buy phones from most major manufacturers that are both CDMA and GSM frequency compatible. Just drop a sim card in it and go.

    2. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Maybe things have changed but Sprint at least used to make it impossible to bring non-sprint phones to their network.

      If that's still the case, change your "Psst" to "Pffft" and keep walking.

    3. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by ryanmetcalf · · Score: 2

      I bought a Craigslist Nexus 5X to replace the Google Store 5X I killed. The CL one had been used on T-Mobile last, but after a 1-2 day wait (while still using backup phone), Sprint was able to provision it for service on their network again. Not painless, but they did do it, and willingly.

    4. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend them for the same reason, but give them time, they're moving to a proper GSM-family LTE network at the moment and they're likely to phase out the old cdmaOne/cdma2000 crap. There almost certainly are non-cdmaOne/2000 LTE phones out there that work with Sprint's LTE network, it's just, obviously, you're going to run into gaps in coverage that are even worse than usual.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Their LTE network uses SIM cards; they can't easily stop you from using SIM cards in a different device without violating enough of LTE to make equipment vendors unlikely to work with them.

      Again though, I'd agree that right now, while their LTE network remains at the "being rolled out stage", they should be avoided.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Maybe things have changed but Sprint at least used to make it impossible to bring non-sprint phones to their network.

      Something did change, apparently: Sprint they decided they wanted to continue to exist as a phone company. That game is pretty much keep up or die now.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    7. Re:Uses CDMA. Do not want. by dj245 · · Score: 2

      Maybe things have changed but Sprint at least used to make it impossible to bring non-sprint phones to their network.

      If that's still the case, change your "Psst" to "Pffft" and keep walking.

      This could be because Spring uses LTE bands that basically nobody else uses. It then depends on your phone model supporting those bands. It may have nothing to do with Sprint being evil, and more to do with the fact that their frequency allocation is different from everyone else.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  7. Great Deal, Crappy Network by Zaphon · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately it's still on Sprint's CRAPPY network. What good is having all that unlimited bandwidth when you can't use it. The city I live in (a suburb of Los Angeles) the service is so terrible I couldn't even make a call. And the funny thing is they have a Sprint store there (where they have one of those mobile hot spots, so your phone works inside the store, but walk 50 feet down the street and you're met with reality.

    1. Re:Great Deal, Crappy Network by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Sprint contracted with another company to build the towers in the Los Angeles area. That company tried to save on costs by building the towers with the maximum separation the manufacturer specified as allowable. Since that maximum separation was for ideal situations, the network ended up with a lot of blind spots in between towers with poor or no coverage.

      Since the towers were already built, they couldn't pick up the towers and move them closer. And adding new towers in between all the existing towers would create problems too - a cellular network relies on the towers being far enough apart that transmissions in one tower's cell are weak enough (due to distance) that they don't interfere with the transmissions in neighboring cells. So they've been trying to fix it by placing intermediate towers only in spots with poor or no coverage.

      For a while they compensated by contracting to use Verizon's towers when roaming. But I guess the roaming payments to Verizon got excessive. Lately their phones have been tuned so that it will try to stick to Sprint if there's the faintest hint of a Sprint signal (i.e. not enough to make a call), rather than switching to roaming on Verizon's network. There's a pay app (Roam Control, root required) which lets you manually switch the phone to roaming-only mode to force it to use Verizon's network. But it stopped working on new phones several years ago.

      Some areas in Southern California have better coverage - the towers there were built after Sprint recognized the problem and fired the original company building the tower network. I'm in Orange County and their coverage is pretty good here, with their LTE giving me 20+ Mbps near my house.

  8. Verizon? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 2

    I don't see this option on Verizon's site at all. They're still pushing 45/line/mo for each of four lines.. $180/mo is very different to $90/mo.

    --

    Long signatures suck.
    1. Re:Verizon? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 1

      Hell, even Sprint's site says it's $50 for one, $90 for two, and 3-5 are free....until 3/31 when it changes to $60 for 1, unknown amount for two, and $30 for each 3-5. You might be going from $90/mo for 5 lines to as much as $190/mo as soon as that date rolls around.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    2. Re:Verizon? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I don't see this option on Verizon's site at all. They're still pushing 45/line/mo for each of four lines.. $180/mo is very different to $90/mo.

      You don't see it on Verizon's site because that's Sprint's deal. Verizon's is 45/line for 4 lines, or double the cost of Sprint, which was the point.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  9. Re:Lines? by Scoth · · Score: 1

    Next you'll be asking how to dial one of the phones since they no longer have a dial.

    Language evolves, it's pretty neat!

  10. Is it really $90? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    T-MOBILE offered me a great price and then tacked on undisclosed fees they try to pass off as taxes.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Is it really $90? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Tmobile (at least according to their own site) has been all in since january 5th.

      When did you try and get service?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  11. The worst part of Google Fi by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Was the sprint part of the network.

    Service got much better when I forced my phone over to the T-Mobile side of the network.

    1. Re:The worst part of Google Fi by natespizer · · Score: 1

      How do you do that?

    2. Re:The worst part of Google Fi by zerofoo · · Score: 1

      Code: *#*#34866#*#*

  12. Re:Lines? by dontbemad · · Score: 1

    What is the point of this faux-pedantry?
    Are you looking for people to stroke your ego because you seem to think "ha, they didn't use the EXACT terminology that I would have used, thus rendering it completely wrong!" or something? If you really didn't understand what they were talking about, you could have googled it and found the answer you sought. However, I strongly doubt that is the case, and instead am led to believe that you just want slashdot points for being an internet old man.

  13. Re:2 lines $90 or 4 lines $90 by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Almost as bad as the ads I get from Charter Cable: "Get phone, TV, and internet for $30 each!"

    So I call and say I don't want phone. Could I get internet and TV for $60?

    Sorry, no, the internet and TV double pack is $80, or $40 apiece.

    For that price I don't want the TV, either. How about internet for $40?

    Nope, sorry, if you just want internet, that's $60. No matter that's twice the advertised rate.

    I get the cost benefits of bundling services, but the pricing scheme is ridiculous.

  14. Ain't that grand.... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Now if they could actually get a usable signal into my house.... Come on guys, I live in the suburbs of a major city where we have houses packed in like cord wood. You really should have excellent coverage here...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Ain't that grand.... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      If the houses are that close together, maybe that's why they can't get good coverage. Coverage requires towers and capacity feeding them.
      No place to put up towers in an area jam-packed with NIMBYs.

  15. Good deal, but it's Sprint. by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The pricing is great. But It's Sprint (and I bet half the people who saw the OP said the same thing).

    I had Project Fi for a while and loved having T-Mobile and Sprint networks, but I could tell instantly which network was active. There was a HUGE difference. And it wasn't because Sprint was better. Now I get service from TMO directly because their rate plans beat Project Fi by a mile and I don't need Sprint.

    All of this is weird for me because I WAS a happy Sprint user for years. Had a voice line, smartphone (Palm Pre IIRC) and a USB data modem and it all worked beautifully. But that was on their CDMA network before the iPhone launched on Sprint. The DAY that product went live, the CDMA performance began to tank. WiMAX never worked worth a shit. Recall one afternoon in a parking lot about 1000 feet from one of their WiMAX towers and the mere act of rolling up my car window killed the signal. WiMAX was a disaster. Their LTE network came on line and it sucked too. I went to Verizon at that point and it was fine, of course.

    But having gone from Verizon to Fi, I got to see how Sprint LTE had progressed and the answer is, hardly at all. It was still crap.

    T-Mobile is working great. I'm not leaving. Not even if Sprint was free.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  16. Re:So the cost with two to four lines is the same. by bobbied · · Score: 2

    It's amazing how much this country hates normal people that refuse to become breeders. Sprint is screwing us for not having the American-expected hateful two parents and two children. It is hate that drives corporations to screw us like this. Pure hate. Dealing with things like this every day as a nonbreeder just makes me want to die. Everyone that rules our lives hates us.

    Nobody hates you for not having kids. You must be from the shallow end of the gene pool with an attitude like that. However, Please keep genes out of the pool going forward if you don't mind...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  17. Re:Lines? by zdzichu · · Score: 1

    Care to enlighten me what would the correct query be?

    --
    :wq
  18. HD Streaming, oh cool! by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

    That totally works when I host the HD video on my home server, right?

  19. FYI, your GSM phone uses CDMA by Solandri · · Score: 1

    UMTS (and HSPDA and HSPA+) is based on wideband CDMA. That's right, CDMA won the CDMA vs GSM war. GSM ended up licensing CDMA from Qualcomm and adding it to the GSM spec for 3G data.

    In fact, 4G LTE service probably wouldn't have been possible without CDMA. Most LTE implementations use OFDMA - the tower tells the phones apart by assigning them orthogonal frequencies. All phones can transmit at the same time, the tower tells them apart because each phone generates orthogonal frequencies (i.e. the same frequency combination cannot be produced by another phone). CDMA tells phones apart by assigning them orthogonal codes. So CDMA was the proof of concept needed to show that this "everyone transmits at the same time" hocus pocus actually worked when scaled up to a nation-wide cellular network.

    Without CDMA, your GSM data speeds would top out at about 150 kbps.

    1. Re:FYI, your GSM phone uses CDMA by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      In case it's not clear, the grandparent was bitching about CDMA the Qualcomm standard, not CDMA the technology. CDMA tech is great; then Qualcomm went and made a terrible standard based on it.

  20. Re:Thats still not unlimited by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Unlimited data is impossible. Stop being a fuck-twit.

  21. Never again by tim620 · · Score: 1

    I tried Sprint once and got burned. Never again. I don't care how cheap they are.

  22. Re:So the cost with two to four lines is the same. by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Dealing with things like this every day as a nonbreeder just makes me want to die. Everyone that rules our lives hates us.

    Go ahead and die, no one will miss you.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  23. Re:You ignorant slut by losfromla · · Score: 1

    I don't think that all. I appreciate your not taking up space into the future, more space for my twelve kids and their broods... :-)

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  24. Auto-pay by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"Sprint's plan requires the account owner to enable AutoPay, ensuring the bill is paid on time each month"

    Yep, and the other carriers are doing this too. And it is WRONG. They are all slipping this anti-consumer crap into their plans. How about not trying to force this type of s*** down our throats and punish people who actually SHOW they are irresponsible by penalizing JUST THOSE PEOPLE instead of everyone?

  25. Re:You ignorant slut by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Are you with a long term partner and don't have kids?

    If not then stfu because I am and I get shit all the time including from strangers about why I'm so selfish and horrible for not having children.

    You're an ignorant ass.

    I am? For agreeing that you should do what you want to you call me names? LOL, the old "I'm rubber and you are glue" saying comes to mind here. PLEASE don't have kids.... Thanks!

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101