Slashdot Mirror


AOL Is Cutting Off Third-Party App Access To AIM (9to5mac.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from 9to5Mac: AOL announced today that it is starting to cut off third-party app access to its Instant Messenger service. As first noticed by ArsTechnica, AOL began notifying users of at least one third-party app, Adium, that it would become obsolete starting on March 28th. At this point, it's unclear whether or not all third-party applications will be rendered useless come March 28th, but the message presented to Adium users seemed to strongly imply that: "Hello. Effective 3/28, we will no longer support connections to the AIM network via this method. If you wish to use the free consumer AIM product, we invite you to visit http://www.aim.com/ for more information." What this likely means is that AOL is shutting down the OSCAR chat protocol that is used to handle AIM messages. The service will, however, continue to be available via AOL's own chat app that is supported on macOS, Windows, iOS, and Android.

118 comments

  1. People still use AIM? by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't remember the last time I saw anyone use AOL much less AIM. Got to be over a decade ago...

    1. Re:People still use AIM? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but this is the last straw, and the majority of those left are taking the opportunity to transition to either ICQ or Google Hangouts.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:People still use AIM? by ocsibrm · · Score: 1

      I haven't used ICQ in about as long as i haven't used AIM personally. IRC still gets rare usage, but discord is my main method for chatting with others anymore.

    3. Re:People still use AIM? by UPi · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was my initial reaction too.

      Similar story: yahoo did the same thing with the yahoo messenger protocol last September. Up until then I was using pidgin to chat on yahoo. After September I just quit using yahoo. So long and thanks for all the fish.

    4. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For me it's e-mail, standard text message, or nothing. I'm not interested in the chat application du jour, that's for young people who haven't experienced firsthand the joy of multiple application switches and losing years of chat history and contacts.

    5. Re:People still use AIM? by Curtman · · Score: 2

      the majority of those left are taking the opportunity to transition to either ICQ or Google Hangouts.

      ICQ is only an alternative client to connect to the AIM network these days, and AOL owns it completely. Why would switching to ICQ be helpful to anyone?

    6. Re:People still use AIM? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      (Whoosh)

      TBH I had no idea ICQ was still even running in any form when I wrote the comment. The comment was supposed to be a joke at AOL and Google's expense (Hangouts is barely 5 years old and has been deprecated for more than a year.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you missed the memo:

      https://techcrunch.com/2010/04...

      ICQ was sold back in 2010.

    8. Re:People still use AIM? by Eloking · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the last time I saw anyone use AOL much less AIM. Got to be over a decade ago...

      Crazy right? I though they only existed in old times when everyone had one of those crappy CD somewhere in their CD box.

      --
      Elok
    9. Re:People still use AIM? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Yes, I had no idea it had even the smallest relevance in today's world!

    10. Re:People still use AIM? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      You are behind the times, ICQ and AIM were merged and then split again and ICQ was sold off.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:People still use AIM? by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect that text message has done it for a lot of people, simply because they don't have to have a computer involved anymore and they can send/receive nearly anywhere. Only downside is that you don't get to set a cutesy or naughty screen name.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's a rare self-whoosh ?

    13. Re:People still use AIM? by EzInKy · · Score: 2

      I give all my contacts cutesy or naughty aliases.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    14. Re:People still use AIM? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that ICQ was sold to Mail.ru, thanks for the heads up.

    15. Re:People still use AIM? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I don't even remember the last time I fired up Trillian, which let me connect to AIM, ICQ, Yahoo... I forget what else. Never even installed it on my current box, which I've already had like 4 years.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:People still use AIM? by Z00L00K · · Score: 0

      So AOL is still alive?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re:People still use AIM? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's how you identify them, not how they identify themselves to you.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    18. Re:People still use AIM? by sremick · · Score: 1

      I still use ICQ with my dad. It's the only IM I'll ever manage to get him to use, as he's the sort to never even get on Facebook or make a Google account. It's kind of nostalgic and I don't mind, and I still use my original sub-500K UIN.

      Hangouts on the other hand is THE primary IM and video-chat tool used among my friends and family. I don't get all the hate...it works great, better than Skype and all the numerous half-baked, feature-limited "new" chat options Google has come out with since. We particularly love its cross-platform ability and web/desktop client to seamlessly move from one device to another mid-chat and not miss a beat.

    19. Re:People still use AIM? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I like Hangouts too.

      The initial concerns with Hangouts were that it was tied to Google Plus, that Google Plus had that stupid real names policy, and that it was a replacement for Google Chat, which was phased out so nobody could use it any more. Once the Google Plus related issues were fixed, there wasn't really a reason to want to use Google Chat over Hangouts, so it became quite a good system.

      The major issue with Hangouts is that Google doesn't want it any more, so we're being pushed to use alternatives, yet again.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:People still use AIM? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Every so often I run across someone who still has an aol email address. It is usually someone who got that email address when they were in high school or college and sees no reason to change it.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:People still use AIM? by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      Hangouts hasn't been deprecated. Its API has been deprecated. The difference between AIM and Hangouts, besides the obvious feature disparity, is that everyone who uses gmail (seemingly 1/2 the planet) can and often do use Hangouts. I prefer Whatsapp but Hangouts is fine by me. It's automatically installed when I add my gmail account to a phone or tablet.

    22. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hangouts is trash because I can't use it from a desktop app

    23. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuckoo!

    24. Re: People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You can use it in Adium.

    25. Re:People still use AIM? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I don't know what Google are saying officially, but in practice Hangouts is deprecated - that is, Google are trying to push people towards alternative products - Allo, Duo, and Messages.

      Which is a shame, I rather like it and like the (current) concept of it being a one stop shop for SMS messages, IMs, and transcribed voicemails.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    26. Re:People still use AIM? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      After September I just quit using yahoo.

      Yahoo effectively killed off my chat program back in (roughly) 2000, via frequent changes to the protocol. After chasing the changes a few times, I just gave up and stopped using Yahoo entirely.

      When a company changes a stable service, or starts blocking access to it, it's usually not a good sign for the longevity of the service.

    27. Re:People still use AIM? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      I think I still have their 3.5" fd somewhere ... and I live a few thsd miles from the US.

    28. Re:People still use AIM? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      so twitter is doomed, after it has blocked API access to many apps and for alternative clients .... some 5 or 6 years ago?

    29. Re:People still use AIM? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      It is still widely used in the financial world. I don't know why, probably just some historical leftover. I wonder how this will affect users in the US from this industry. They all use proxies or other tools with AIM to fulfill regulatory requirements about recording communications.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    30. Re: People still use AIM? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I don't login to my icq account anymore because I kinda stopped talking to other people about two years ago, but still remember my uin by heart :-)

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    31. Re:People still use AIM? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      In practice, they also tried to kill their Google Voice app, when they rolled the functionality into Hangouts...and now they have a new Google Voice web site and app.

      I'm sticking with Hangouts until I have to switch.

    32. Re:People still use AIM? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's available as a Chrome desktop app. Works pretty well as long as you use Chrome.

    33. Re: People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say yes that change did have an effect on where they are today. Twitter could have created a bigger more profitable ecosystem

    34. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol...word for word, I said your subject line to myself just as I was clicking on the article title.

    35. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the problem, bro? You can totally connect to the Google chat network if you change your web browser to Google. Even better if you change the OS to Google too, and run it on Google hardware. So convenient!

      At least it's not a walled garden like Apple, though.

    36. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google aren't pushing very hard. I certainly haven't felt any pressure to switch from Hangouts, other than it not being that good to start with, although they have finally add a "last read" feature so you can go back to the point you last read up to in busy chats. If they were killing it, why add new features?

      They problem is Google can be somewhat schizophrenic at times, and their various chat apps are an example of this.

    37. Re:People still use AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't work well, it works badly. It's slow with a clunky UI. Not to mention it's insistence on placing itself on all of my virtual desktops every time I launch it.

      Although it'd be an improvement if I didn't have to use it with Chrome, I could probably live with that if it did actually work well.

    38. Re:People still use AIM? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Cruella de Vil is a very appropriate handle for my ex-wife no matter how angelic she perceives herself.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    39. Re:People still use AIM? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Fake news is the last straw? Third party IM clients will still be able to access AIM service. The only people impacted are those using clients that are dead projects. AOL notified third party clients about this change months ago. This is a non story with a ridiculous headline.

    40. Re:People still use AIM? by allo · · Score: 1

      AOL sold ICQ.

    41. Re:People still use AIM? by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Yes, others mentioned that... I haven't used it since my 5 digit UIN was stolen from me. Back when they only allowed 8 character passwords, with no options whatsoever for recovery. I hate you Mirabilis ICQ.

    42. Re:People still use AIM? by allo · · Score: 1

      That's sad.
      And currently they seem to allow password change only via web ui, which flags your account for suspicious activity is unlucky and then you need to add a mobile number.

  2. Is AIM still going? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Does anyone still use that, I seriously thought it went away like MSN and Yahoo Messenger.

  3. And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... That mongrel still lives on ?

    Nuke it from orbit, the only way to be sure...

    1. Re: And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckin' A.

  4. Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's either AD revenue, or government monitoring behind this one. There's no reason to not support a third party client otherwise. Especially when the client already exists. (Time and money to change the protocol implementation for what? Some cat and mouse game that the third party will win given enough time?)

    1. Re:Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just so you know, "ad" is an abbreviation of "advertisement", not an acronym. There's no need to capitalise it, unless you feel the need to shout it for some reason.

    2. Re:Ads. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to not support a third party client otherwise.

      Supporting 3rd party clients still costs money for hardware and administration. That's a reason. Perhaps AOL just don't see the point of that expense any more.

    3. Re:Ads. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      This is purely speculative on my part but I would guess it's the latter. Yahoo killed access for 3rd party chat applications some time ago.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Ads. by mlts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is going to kill AIM. Yes, it takes expense to support third party items, but being open gets more people using the service.

      There have been a shitload of closed chat systems, Anyone remember "Ding!" in the 1990s? There were many "Internet phone" companies also offering chat mechanisms as well. The reason why they are not around is because never were open enough to attract third party developers.

      Plus, who uses AIM these days? If I need to message someone, it will either be SMS/MMS, FB Messenger, Signal, iMessage, or even Skype. AIM isn't worth the time in keeping a client open for it.

    5. Re:Ads. by TWX · · Score: 2

      It could be a further step to see if, after cutting off the API, how much usage it really has left. If it turns out that if usage drops 90% then they'll probably just pull the plug entirely.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AD?? AD!!? I'M SO SICK OF SEEING ADS!!!!!!!
      messing with the filter messing with the filter messing with the filter

    7. Re:Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more than it costs to run it for the official client. Unless your only source of funding for that is ADs, and the vast majority of your users are using third party clients that don't display the ADs.

      In the end, no one wants to maintain 5+ logins to the various communication methods available. That's why things like third party clients (which aggregate multiple feeds), and SSO (Single Sign On) are popular. It's also why when you choose to *break existing support* for them that you will inevitably loose some of your userbase.

    8. Re:Ads. by xession · · Score: 1

      Plus, who uses AIM these days?

      No idea on the number of AIM users but I was pretty shocked to have just learned that 11 million monthly users of ICQ still exist... According to: https://corp.mail.ru/en/compan...

    9. Re:Ads. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      SMS/MMS, FB Messenger, Signal, iMessage, or even Skype.

      all of which are thoroughly NSL'd to hell and back.

    10. Re:Ads. by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      This is going to kill AIM. Yes, it takes expense to support third party items, but being open gets more people using the service.

      I wish I could agree. However, what I've seen in the last couple of years has been nearly the entire userbase of instant messengers moving from 'open' networks like AIM, Jabber, IRC, or so forth, and instead to semi-closed (skype) or entirely-closed (Discord, Facebook) protocols instead. Very disappointing and depressing for those of us who use (and like) applications like Pidgin FAR more than any proprietary protocol application I've ever tried.

    11. Re:Ads. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      3rd party clients and the official client run through different protocols. At the end of the day someone has to ensure it works day to day and after any software / hardware update. I wouldn't be surprised if the servers running this stuff are getting towards the end of their lives anyway so replacing them would be an expense. Point being there are valid reasons they might wish to shut it down.

    12. Re: Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AD adders added ADS because AOL chose their Luddite client over addy ADS.
      ADS!

  5. What year? by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AOL began notifying users of at least one third-party app, Adium, that it would become obsolete starting on March 28th.

    It might've been more efficient to personally notify the last 6 users.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:What year? by digitig · · Score: 1

      Maybe most of those 6 weren't checking their AIM messages any more.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:What year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother, they've not had anyone in their friends list for a decade anyway.

  6. Still use it by borcharc · · Score: 2

    I still have a handful of friends who haven't transitioned to xmpp or another system in pidgin.

    1. Re:Still use it by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I still know a few people who still use AOL!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  7. iChat? by v1 · · Score: 1

    Apple's iChat uses (used?) OSCAR/AIM for chat and initiating video conferencing. I'm not sure if that's still the case, as they've been through several major changes more recently. (to messages and facetime apps)

    Anyone have more information on this?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:iChat? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Will iChat be keeping its support given its long history with AOL?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:iChat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it could use iChat but it didnt rely on AIM being available to use the app either

  8. Telegram and Discord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people use Telegram and Discord now, both of which bury AIM in userbase and features. Just quit using AIM, it's a relic of another age.

    1. Re:Telegram and Discord by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Telegram and Discord both still doesn't have a basic usable contact list, so I have no fucking clue what the shit you mean by features.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Telegram and Discord by damnbunni · · Score: 3

      Telegram requires a phone number. Discord has by far the worst UI I've ever seen in a software product.

      And I've used dBASE II, so that's saying something.

    3. Re:Telegram and Discord by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Discord doesn't have a well designed desktop client - the experience is like using a java application except it's javascript instead. A memory hungry UI that doesn't conform to desktop conventions, takes too much space, and is frankly ugly, esp when up next to all the other skinned applications foisted on us these days (eg steam, two grey colored windows and they don't even match). It also lacks open client side crypto (eg OTR).

    4. Re:Telegram and Discord by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Telegram requires a phone number.

      Telegram also shows all your contacts as being online 24-hours/day, which really sucks because you have no idea if that person is "around" or available for chatting. Eventually there were people I used to chat with often but rarely chat with now because the chances of seeing a response to a hello is low, as opposed to catching someone when they're online. I feel like folks switch to Telegram and then they don't chat on the network anymore, at least not as much as they used to. I sure don't, and it's because I don't know who is around.

      Discord has by far the worst UI I've ever seen in a software product.

      I would like to introduce you to Steam chat (the chat portion of Steam). I have yet to see anything worse, even Discord is a breath of fresh air compared to it. For fuck's sake, you can't even change the incredibly tiny fonts, there's no ability to log, no offline messages... yucky on every level.

    5. Re: Telegram and Discord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of "bring online" is itself a relic of the pre-smartphone age. Messaging is now an asynchronous medium... you are probably not getting a response to "hello" because it's a message devoid of useful content. Try sharing a cat photo or something.

    6. Re: Telegram and Discord by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The idea of "bring online" is itself a relic of the pre-smartphone age.

      Yes and no. I'm interested in having an actual synchronous conversation with someone, not "hey" "at the store" etcetc. And they're interested in that too, but the technology now makes little distinction. And when they're actually "Around" at home, that's something we do. But finding out those time periods is harder than it used to be. I really don't want to bother people at dinner, and I sure as hell don't want my phone buzzing while I'm in a movie or at work for that matter, so I turned Telegram off on the phone (actually I uninstalled it when it went through my contacts without asking and sent an alert to each and every one of them with the telegram account that I'd thought was private. Talk about invasive).

      And these aren't random people or strangers, they're friends, and we will chat a lot. It's just that on the "always connected" network, everyone always appears to be around and but isn't, and you never know.

  9. Isn't XMPP almost as dead as AIM/Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genuinely asking.

    For the western world it seems like everybody is on Skype or Kik or Facebook IM, with outliers or niche communities on a variety of other protocols, plus region specific alternatives for China/Russia/etc.

    1. Re:Isn't XMPP almost as dead as AIM/Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These things are area specific which is funny given how messaging apps are supposed to be a great way to help people from all over the world to connect. Here whatsapp is the most widely used. Some people knowledgeable in technology are using telegram but that's about it.

      It is a shame as we have an open protocol available which allow for decentralized use with XMPP yet if you have to reach people from all over the globe you still need revert to email or use a handful of proprietary messaging apps.

    2. Re:Isn't XMPP almost as dead as AIM/Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XMPP is a nice protocol for our in-house corporate IM server... i don't know if it's used much on the internet-at-large

  10. The impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure all 7 of the affected users still using AOL will be very sad.

  11. Adium still being developed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks quite dead for at least two years. Even downloading "extras" is broken. Too bad, it's a pretty nice application but I guess the devs have moved on..

  12. You CAN reach people all over the worldvia XMPP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even from/to clearnet from Tor/I2P. In that regard it has succeeded.

    On the OTHER hand, the federated XMPP services available are all niche offerings now. The majority don't have conference servers running (meaning most people go to another IM service/social network, or back to IRC for realtime group messaging.

    The only major conference server as far as channels goes is jabber.org (or xmpp.net? I forget.) however the majority of the channels are dead/empty, and the room listing doesn't provide user quantities for channels, so finding a channel that isn't dead among the tens of thousands which ARE is exceedingly difficult. And yes there really are thousands to tens of thousands of channels up there. Many in non-english languages. It seems that despite using coming from servers all over the internet, the channel usage mostly congregated around that one server. Which thanks to Cisco's purchase and dismantling of jabber/xmpp has left it essentially dead.

  13. And nothing of value was lost. by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I used it quite a lot a decade ago. But anymore these days, it was basically only still on my system because it's pretty trivial to paste the username and password into Pidgin.

    I guess Pidgin will just be for my ever-dwindling list of XMPP services, now.

    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Same story here except with Trillian.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillian is an abomination.

  14. what takes the role of IM today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what takes the role of IM today? Is it Facebook? Facebook messager? Phone text messaging? IRC? email? twitter?

    1. Re:what takes the role of IM today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook, discord, skype, whatsapp, snapchat... no shortage of ways to send short messages over the internet.

    2. Re:what takes the role of IM today? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      none of which have open, client side crypto, optional cutesy space wasting emojis, and UI environment conformance (eg discord).

  15. No interest in AOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I would like to thank them for reminding me about Adium as I still use Jabber/Google.

  16. What About Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what is the one Linux user of AIM supposed to do come March 28?

    1. Re:What About Linux? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Will give you the whooosh, but here... open up a browser, go to AOL's AIM site, and then work from there }:-)

  17. What of it? by andywest · · Score: 1

    I put Adium in the Dock of all the Macs that I tend to at work. I will not remove Adium because it supports other protocols like XMPP. I will not install a separate AIM app because in removing OSCAR, AOL is admitting that AIM is a futile exercise.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
  18. 2003 Called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want their thing that anyone would care about back.

  19. TOC not OSCAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The TOC2 protocol is the official third party protocol to talk with AIM. OSCAR is the official protocol used by the AIM client, which has never officially been supported by use for third parties. Are they shutting down TOC2, or are they just blocking clients using OSCAR?

    It sounds like they are just blocking OSCAR clients... third party apps can still connect via TOC2, which has always been the official method. It sounds like Ars and friends don't know what they're talking about and couldn't be assed to do a little research.

    1. Re:TOC not OSCAR by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " It sounds like Ars and friends don't know what they're talking about and couldn't be assed to do a little research."

      So, in other words, business as usual over at Ars?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:TOC not OSCAR by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

      TOC2 has been shut down for years, last I checked.

    3. Re:TOC not OSCAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good catch. TOC was shut down in 2012. OSCAR support was never official... AIM really should have kept TOC around...

  20. Will ruffle feathers by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    This is bound to upset AIM's remaining users: both of them.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  21. CNN fakenews = arstechnica = banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN fakenews (banned from the whitehouse by our president owns arseholetechnica) Ars minions must downmod hide this. Demons wither if exposed to sunlight and they can't have it.

  22. Well, that's it then by PPH · · Score: 1

    No more reason for me to use AOL. Please come and take all your floppy disks back.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  23. typical media failure by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Hello. Effective 3/28, we will no longer support connections to the AIM network via this method. If you wish to use the free consumer AIM product, we invite you to visit http://www.aim.com/ for more information.

    That is, all they are announcing is that they are discontinuing some protocol, not that they are discontinuing support for all third party clients.

    The headline is typical of the fake news outrage machine: "Some people in group X are affected by Y" turns into "People in group X are affected by Y", which then morphs into "Y decides to screw over everybody in group X because Y is evil!"

  24. Know then by puddingebola · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A beginning is a very delicate time. Know then, that is is the year 1997. The known universe is ruled by the Padishah Emperor Bill Gates, my father. In this time, the most precious substance in the universe is code. The code extends life. The code expands consciousness. The code is vital to the internet. The Microsoft Corporation and its engineers, who the code has mutated over 22 years, use the code, which gives them the ability to dominate the market place. That is, rule the mindshare without moving. Because the Microsoft Corporation controls the default operating system, they are the highest power in the Universe. The Code also plays a very secret role in the Open Source community, of which I am a part. The open source community has been interfering with the proprietary code, and the corporations producing it thereof, of the great Internet of the Universe, cleverly replacing proprietary code with open source to form the FOSS, a super being. They plan to control this super being and use its powers for their own purposes. The coding plan has been carried out in a strict manner since the GNU project in 1984. The goal of the super being is in sight. But now, so close to the prize, a crazy student, Linus, the bound debtor of the University of Helsinki, who has been ordered to bear only proprietary code, has given birth to a kernal. Oh, yes. I forgot to tell you. The code exists all over the entire Internet. Hidden away within the rocks of this vast network are a people known as the Free Software Foundation, who have long held a prophecy that a man would come, a messiah, who would lead them to true freedom. The URL is https://www.fsf.org/, also known as FSF.

    1. Re:Know then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty awsome.

    2. Re:Know then by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    3. Re:Know then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is why I still read slashdot

  25. Frequent user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friends and I have been using AIM for about 20 years. I'm not adverse to trying out a new chat protocol, but why should we? What benefits do the new chats have that are worth convincing people to change to?

    1. Re:Frequent user by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      My friends and I have been using AIM for about 20 years. I'm not adverse to trying out a new chat protocol, but why should we? What benefits do the new chats have that are worth convincing people to change to?

      If some of your friends are not satisfied with AIM, for example because compatibility with their favorite client is broken, this is a good enough reason to change.

  26. Interrupted Trading by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    While mainstream consumers have long since moved on from AIM commodities traders still rely on it as their primary IM client between brokers. And since trading falls under the purview of the Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) legislation must be recorded. Although AIM has a conversation history feature it cannot be centrally administrated. This has led to a third party IM recording industry. If this change cuts off these third parties access to the server then traders will not be allowed to use AIM and there will be a scramble to find an alternative. Since Intercontinental Exchange's ICE chat already communicates with AIM servers many firms have moved to it. But this might also affect ICE chat's ability to connect to AIM servers.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Interrupted Trading by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Lots of options with XMPP. If someone in the industry can tie two pieces of string together, they'll make some money on it.

    2. Re:Interrupted Trading by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      There have been no clear successors despite tens if not hundreds of attempts by some of the biggest players. Google and Microsoft have been pushing their offerings hard and they're not bad offerings. But the traders and brokers are stubborn and steadfast. They HATE change (but love volatility). It will literally take something like shutting down their go to tool for them to choose a new one. XMPP (AKA jabberd) was the clear choice early on but it still hasn't been adopted widely and suffers from the Not Invented Here syndrome.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  27. Completely false reporting by alexo · · Score: 5, Informative

    AOL is doing no such thing. The whole thing is false.

    Here are the facts that I know:

    On Sept. 21st, the Tech Director of Product Management and Support of the AIM Platform reached out via the Pidgin mailing list, advising that there will be a breaking change in the way AIM handles client logins. This was done specifically to ensure a smooth transition to the new login method. He then worked with Pidgin developers to provide an alternative.

    Pidgin 2.12, due to be released in a week or so, will support the new authentication method. Since Adium uses the same communication library, I believe it will also support it. I do not know if Trillian, Miranda and other other 3rd-party clients will make the change.

    What is happening is that AOL is alerting its users that the "old" login method will be obsoleted in a month and that they should either upgrade their client or switch to another one in order to keep using the service.

    <rant> I remember the times when /. was more about facts and informed discussion than clickbait and knee-jerk tirades. Damn, I feel old. </rant>

    1. Re:Completely false reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was not able to find the dialog from AOL on the pidgin mailing list archive you refer to . However, I did see some mention of it from developers from Feb 2017 on the Support list. Do you have a URL to the dialogue?

    2. Re:Completely false reporting by alexo · · Score: 4, Informative
  28. AIM still used for power trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIM is still being used by some utilities to initiate power trading. Archiving companies such as Smarsh won't be able to support this product if they rely on OSCAR to broker the connection. Archiving these conversations is necessary for legal reasons in case of a dispute between utilities. Other Instant Message methods are also supported by Smarsh, such as via ICE (InterContinental Exchange) Instant Messaging, which is where utilities will most likely migrate to if AIM really does kill all third-party access.

    Smarsh IM Archiving
    ICE Instant Messaging

  29. AIM still useful by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 3, Informative

    The notification have also been coming in on Pidgin. I heard someone say that AOL is changing he authenitication mechanism (not at all improbable), and that Pidgin will update the ode to handle the new mechanism . I am guessing they are upgrading to stronger encryption mechanisms. So if this is true Pidgin will keep on working with the new Pidgin release.

    AIM and Pidgin is still useful, still very reliable way to communicate and still is nice to be able to use a native client on the desktop rather than have to use a web client.

    Hopefully pidgin will include OTR by defualt soon which would provide end to end encyrption on by default, because things have been a little stagnant lately

  30. mandatory geek reading by epine · · Score: 1

    Back in the day (2014), this was mandatory geek reading:

    David Auerbach: Chat Wars

  31. I thought by jeneag · · Score: 1

    I thought that AOL died when they stopped selling desktops that read floppy disks? Now I feel like I've been in the woods past 19 years.

  32. this sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going to post on my frienster and livejournal about how much it sucks, might even make it a headline on my angelfire page.

  33. Pidgin way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've also read that Pidgin will be updated. Here's hoping! Our family has been using it for years and still use it daily. I prefer keyboard typing vs phone texts any day and like that I can go back and check an older chat log when looking for a shared link/information. I've tried other programs but do not like the ads and/or interface. The simplicity of this program goes a long way!