Slashdot Mirror


New Zealand Will Give You a Free Trip If You Agree To a Job Interview (esquire.com)

An anonymous reader shares an Esquire article: If New Zealand is on your bucket list, it's time to fill out a job application. You see, the tech industry in Wellington, New Zealand is trying to recruit experts from around the world to their community, so they're offering a free trip if you can prove you want the job and deserve an interview. They're calling it a "global talent attraction program" and 100 potential recruits will be invited on the free (yes, free) week-long trip. But, of course, the catch is you have to prove why you could serve as a software developer, creative director, product manager, analyst or digital strategist to get a free ticket. Once you do, your itinerary will be filled with interviews and meetings with others in the New Zealand tech community members, as well as excursions around Wellington.

195 comments

  1. "trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So unless you're at least somewhat famous in the tech community, no dice.

    1. Re:"trying to recruit experts" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      So unless you're at least somewhat famous in the tech community, no dice.

      And just as in Silicon Valley, there's an age limit. In NZ though, it's 55 rather than 39.

    2. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, not New Zealand is going to be infested by smelly indo-chimps with phony "phd's", who love free rides, all their parasitic lives.

    3. Re:"trying to recruit experts" by ukoda · · Score: 2

      I suspect that is because you can retire at 65 so they are basically saying they expect 10 years work from you for their investment. From what I hear age is a big issue in Silicon Valley but is is not here in New Zealand, the only problem I find as an older employee (54), is that my pay expectations are now too high for a lot of companies. If I didn't mind a pay cut I would expect I could find work at almost any tech company in New Zealand as skills and ability to fit in with the existing teams are the main thing employers are looking for here.

      About Wellington, they say "You can't beat Wellington on a good day" and that is true, but they do have a lot of windy days there, you have been warned. Depending on where you come from you may find Wellington has a very small feel about it but it does have great people and a good culture so is worth checking out.

    4. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me more. This sounds like a great country... how is the food?

    5. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      Probably terrible if they aren't letting any non-white people in

    6. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White != AngloSaxon

    7. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, that's why, about 15 years ago cooks from France, Italy, Belgium and Luxembourg were offered a free trip. That initiative came right after a similar one for Indian chefs. But they found that their food stayed in the human body for too short a time.

    8. Re:"trying to recruit experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah -- the Long Term Skill Shortage List Residence Visa has a cut off at 55; and that's probably the reason for it.

      (LTSSL is the list of jobs that NZ immigration deems we need, so if you've got skills on that list you can get residence a LOT more easily -- and, yes, Programmers are on the list - as are radiographiers and a bunch of other professions.)

    9. Re: "trying to recruit experts" by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      It's pretty good - from my experience, NZ has few noticeable flaws.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    10. Re:"trying to recruit experts" by GNious · · Score: 1

      Would jump on this program in a heartbeat (assuming they can use a project/programme manager), but too ill to travel at the mo* :( And, windy just makes it feel at home :)

      Turning 40 this year also means I can give up on a large number of job-opportunities even here in Europe, so moving somewhere nice and with (hopefully) friendly people sounds like an idea!

      *: doubt that'll be the only hindrance though ;)

  2. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you looking for new pastures and in that industry not a bad deal.

    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's in Wellington. Calling someone a wellington in NZ is like calling them a dickshaft. That's how bad Wellington is, because it is populated by wellingtons.

    2. Re:well by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      So you got booted out, eh?

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:well by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or a girlfriend. Sheep outnumbers people by 10 to 1.

    4. Re:well by sit1963nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want sheep shaggers, go to Australia.
      They have yet to explain why Koalas have STIs
      And Rolf Harris (in Prison in the UK for behaving like Trump) sang a popular Aussie song all about tying a kangaroo down mate....WTF????

    5. Re:well by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      New Zealand -- Were the men are men and the sheep are nervous.

    6. Re:well by ThePawArmy · · Score: 1

      Wellington... (spits)....

    7. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rest of the world: where spelling/grammar aren't taught and the subjunctive form or the verb "to be" (were) is conflated with the word "where". Assume you are from US or UK?

    8. Re:well by Falconhell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lol, another bitter Kiwi, probably butt hurt from all the losing at cricket.
      You know why Kiwis dont take their girlfriends to the cricket?
      They are afraid they will jump the fence, and start eating the grass.
      Why do Kiwi horses go so fast?
      Theyve seen what happens to the sheep.

    9. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just confuse us with Tasmania?

    10. Re: well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To all the sheep fetishists making jokes about nz, get with the program. New Zealand is now dairy country, Fonterra has taken over, sheep are so last millenium as far as farmers are concerned. And don't be fooled by the 'clean, green' adverts. Waterways are so badly polluted by the dairy industry that the government has just changed the goalposts so that polluted and unsafe rivers can be declared safe for swimming.

    11. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the losing at cricket? I guess you're excluding the most recent series they played..

    12. Re:well by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Why do Scotsmen wear kilts?

      A sheep can hear a zipper for miles.

      Seriously guys, why don't you pick someone far away to hate on?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:well by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Hobbits?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    14. Re:well by sit1963nz · · Score: 1, Funny

      A Kiwi is a protected flightless bird in NZ, where as a "Cock or two" is what every Aussie wants

      Australia's favourite girls name is Baaa-baaa-ra

      Australians have some of the most beautiful women on earth, until they start talking.

      Australia started as a prison colony, so everyone was surprised that they did not invent the cell phone.

      In NZ we call then pubs, in Australia they are called Bars, it make them feel more at home apparently.
      We were surprised though they did not spell them Baa's

      Australia has Beer with XXXX on it because they could not spell Beer, they are one up on the Canadians though who have beer with only XXX on it, so we know Aussies can count higher than Canadians "eh"

      Australia has some of the most venomous creatures on earth, and that just the Sheila's from Sydney

      More ....lol....???

    15. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many more sheep per head of population in Australia.

    16. Re:well by z0idberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously guys, why don't you pick someone far away to hate on?

      The worst insults and nastiest fights are often between brothers and sisters.

    17. Re:well by youngone · · Score: 1
      It looks like a total load of bull to me.

      I clicked the link, and the Wellingtonnz.com website is "taking a short break".

      Also, what the hell is a "Tech Community"? Is it some sort of industry group or something?. The article is pretty short on details.

      What the stupid article fails to mention is that we have a points system for immigrants, if you don't reach the points threshold, you don't get in, even if you have a job offer (although a firm job offer is usually enough).

      So you might get a free week in Wellington, and if the gale force winds are to your liking you might get a job offer, then not be allowed to stay anyway.

    18. Re:well by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Ba ding! RIM*SHOT!

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    19. Re:well by MortimerGraves · · Score: 1

      "Wellingtonian" is the demonym, and if the term is in the least pejorative, it is perhaps only because we keep our politicians there. :)

    20. Re:well by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The worst insults and nastiest fights are often between brothers and sisters.

      And followed by make-up incest? That's how Appalachians & Mormons roll.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    21. Re:well by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      What's the difference between Australia and an apple?

      If you leave an apple for long enough, it'll grow a culture.

      (And no, I'm not a Kiwi)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    22. Re:well by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      So, a Kiwi is such a pathetic bird it cant even fly.
      Nobody calls pubs bars in Australia.
      Just changing the location from NZ to Australia is typical of the dull headed people who cant pronounce the letter I correctly, leading to commentators who talk about a batsmen getting a " bug, thuck nuck to a ball outside off stump"

    23. Re:well by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I mean real cricket, not that one day hit and giggle crap.
      test cricket is the only real cricket.

    24. Re:well by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      What do Kiwi's and sperm have in common?
      Millions of them enter and only a couple of them actually work.

      A tour bus full of tourists stops by a farmer holding a sheep. One of them calls out "are you shearing?".
      The farmer yells back, in an unhappy tone 'NO, **** off and get your own!'

      A Chinaman, a German and a Kiwi are working on a high rise construction site.
      At lunch time, they sat down together and opened their lunchboxes. The Chinaman looked inside and said, "Ah, if I get dumpling again, I gonna jump off the building". The German looked inside and said, "Mann, if I get Sauerkraut nd Pickle again, I vill jump off zee building too". The Kiwi looked inside and said, "Smokes if I get fush and chups again, I'm gonna jump off this building as well'! The next day at lunchtime, they open their lunchboxes. The Chinaman looked inside and said, "Ah, DUMPLINGS!!!". He jumped off the 32nd floor and died. The German looked inside and said, "Mann, SAUERKRAUT ND PICKLE!!!!" He jumped off the 32nd floor and died. The Kiwi looked inside and said, "Smokes, FUSH AND CHUPS!!!" He jumped off the 32nd floor and died.
      At the funeral, the Chinamans wife said, "If I know he no like dumplings, I will have make something different". The Germans wife said, "If I know he doesn't like Sauerkraut nd Pickle, I vould have made zompting (something) divferent." Everyone looked at the Kiwi's wife. She said, "Don't look at me, he made his own lunch".

      The Kiwis have solved their own fuel problems.
      They imported 50 million tonnes of sand from the Arabs and they're going to drill for their own oil.

      Buy some unqiue Moai bar stools

      Two Kiwis are riding horses along the fence line of their property and find a sheep with it's head stuck in the fence.
      One bloke jumps off his horse and, of course as most Kiwis would, has his way with the sheep. When he was finished he said to his mate: "Right, your turn!" His mate jumped off his horse and stuck his head in the fence.

      What do you call a Kiwi with a thousand lovers.....

      A shepherd.

  3. Do they need Infrastructure People? by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

    Great, hire all the programmers, but what about the folks who build the series of tubes that these hobbit loving keyboard warriors mash their face on with their LOLCats code? You need those folks too.

    Let's talk brass tacks here: What's the fastest internet speed I can get for my house there in NZ and how much does it cost per month? This is what matters.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The tubes are all new, and they're fibre.

      Most people get 100mbit. It's between $60 and $100 depending if you can live with a data cap or not. You can get up to 1g. My ISP offers a plan where "you should see 700 - 900Mbps" down and 400 - 450 up for $140

      Of course fibre isn't available everywhere in NZ, but it is pretty much everywhere in Wellington.

    2. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 100mb/30mb fibre for $NZ90
      But some places you can get gigabit 1000mb/500mb for about $NZ130, at least you can here in Tauranga, not sure about Wellington though.

    3. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also at the end of the internet. Ping times are notoriously slow, anything past Australia feels slow.

    4. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Auckland, so not 100% sure where Wellington is but in Akl, Cheapest gig fibre i know of is 135$nzd pm naked uncapped with orcon. But options in NZ are, adsl,vdsl2, ufb (fibre) at down/up speeds of: 30/10, 100/20, 200/20, 200/200 and 1g. Just depends how far the ufb rollout is, its not everywhere yet. But check the chorus website they have a rollout plan with estimate dates on when fibre will be where

    5. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gigabit, unlimited for around $130 per month, available pretty much anywhere urban. However New Zealand is now the first country to go live with NG-PON2, so 10 gigabit is likely to be available within a few years if you have money to burn.

    6. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      Well Weta Workshops seems to be going just fine.

    7. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orc on? What if I want my fibre without Orcs?

    8. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm Australian but have worked and lived in Wellington a bit, and in the USA. New Zealand internet on the whole is pretty good. Within Wellington you should be able to get a fibre connection at 100 Mbps no problems, at a cost similar to in the US.

      Ping times to sites in Europe and America are obviously high, but not much you can do about that (pesky speed of light!) Most big sites have CDNs in NZ or Australia though, so it's not really a problem unless you enjoy playing online games that don't have local servers...

    9. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You should've thought of that before you let Peter Jackson into the country...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      So yet another country with better Internet than North America.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      So, what's the climate like in Wellington - are they always wearing their Wellies? Looks less pleasant than Auckland, by a longshot.

    12. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by TWX · · Score: 1

      The laborers needed to dig trenches, installc conduit, and install/terminate fiber can be found locally. The low-level IT support to get equipment physically patched, base-configured, and the cabling dressed cleanly can be found locally. The staff to configure the higher level functions of the L3 network don't have to be local if the first two did their jobs right, and there are also far fewer of this class of job needed to begin with so they too can probably be found locally.

      The same arguments against H1B visa immigration abuse in the United States apply everywhere else too; if you have enough local talent then bringing in outside workers results in depressing wages, and if there's no need for outside workers then there's no reason to bring them in.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    13. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I think I'd rather be further North. Hamilton or Auckland look like they more pleasant climates. I'd sign up if this were for Auckland.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    14. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason that there's a saying in NZ "you can't beat Wellington on a fine day"!

    15. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      If you have enough local talent then yes. But with a population of only 4 million NZ doesn't have enough local talent for the highly specialised skill sets. The small population means there simply isn't enough opportunities for the growth and development of those specialist skill sets, so you import them.

      There is absolutely nothing wrong with importing talent, in fact it is massively in your countries favour as you are off loading the cost of education and training to someone else and deriving the benefit. Where there are problems is when you have no wage protection for those people coming into the country allowing companies to use H1B style visas for cheap labour.

      In the end NZ could offer 10 figure salaries for these roles. It doesn't mean that someone who can do the job would magically appear. This is also not restricted to IT.

    16. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      And they're on a frickin' island!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    17. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I liked Wellington when I was there (in late August). It was my favorite city by far. Auckland is just another big city. Nothing too special although the suburbs were nice.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    18. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by ukoda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I grew up in Wellington and now live in Auckland. The stats are more hours of sunshine in Wellington than Auckland and the reported temperatures are similar. The real catch with Wellington is the common icy cold winds coming up from down south often ruin what could be a lovely day. I ride a motorcycle often so I care about the weather and Auckland is much better. That said Wellington is still going to be a lot better than some places I have visited. Simply put what you think of Wellington weather is going to depend on where you come from, what you are used to.

    19. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by ukoda · · Score: 1

      Yep, the catch with this offer is you are going to need have exceptional skills before they fly you out here. We have shortages in the tech area but they are not with basic programmers and the like, I doubt something like a couple of years with C# are going to get you a look in.

    20. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by youngone · · Score: 1

      You really don't want to live in Hamilton. It is a country town that got big, so none of the charm of a small town, and all the inconvience of a city.

    21. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by youngone · · Score: 1
      Wellington has the worst climate in New Zealand. It gets both Northerly and Southerly gales, sometimes in the same day. The winters are not cold enough to snow, but they get "lazy winds" (they can't be bothered going around you, so they just cut right through).

      Having said that, Cuba St. is quite fun, bars and restaurants and some good bands playing most weekends.

    22. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to latency to the other side of the planet is obvious: neutrino based communications, no more annoyed by this pesky matter!
      I'm going to patent it!

    23. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      Do you get those speeds to the rest of the world, or just within NZ?

    24. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by robot5x · · Score: 1

      Hi! How's the weather in Auckland today?!

      --
      Hej! Nasi tu byli!
    25. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      So, what's the climate like in Wellington - are they always wearing their Wellies? Looks less pleasant than Auckland, by a longshot.

      I've done software development for brief periods in Wellington, and visited for conferences and work, too.

      Wellington is the best worst town in the world, where weather is concerned. It's basically open ocean from there to Antarctica, and that means bitter cold and beastly winds. But it's got lots of covered walkways, and the CBD is small enough that you can typically get from A to B without too much fuss. And there are enough cafes and bars around with actual decent coffee and beer that you can find shelter most anywhere.

      Most of the IT people that I've met there are really decent folks. They're generally unpretentious and focused on getting things done.

      I'd totally apply if I didn't already have my dream job.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    26. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by javaguy · · Score: 1

      Do you get those speeds to the rest of the world, or just within NZ?

      TCP latency limits the bandwidth of a single international connection, but in parallel you'll get that throughput. Since Netflix has nodes in NZ you could run multiple 4K streams across it no problem, all while downloading files and doing anything else you needed to do.

    27. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get 150/150 here in Boston for 80$.

    28. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by youngone · · Score: 1
      Not bad, about 24C at the moment, (it's the afternoon right now), gentle nor'wester sea-breeze. Quite pleasant.

      Interestingly, it absolutely hosed with rain last night at my house, for about an hour and a half, but one of my colleagues was about 10 kms away at her cousin's house and saw no rain at all, so go figure.

    29. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people get 100mbit. It's between $60 and $100 depending if you can live with a data cap or not.

      I'd love to move to NZ, but I'm currently paying NZD 60 for a 300Mbps fibre connection with no cap. For $100 I could have 500Mbps, but personally I don't see the benefit, as the bottleneck is further downstream at these speeds.

    30. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you are talking about. In Dallas we have gigabit from AT&T if you care to shell out $70 a month under a 2 year contract. I'm sure that is available in a number of other areas as well.

    31. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roughly: Wellington = Seattle, Auckland = San Francisco.

    32. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its more a jobs fair with free travel. The skills needed have to be better than anyone in NZ can be educated with or that NZ can fly in from Australia.
      Australia and NZ have a few of gov agreements making a few aspects of working in each others nations less hard.
      Given NZ can produce staff with the skill sets to work with the NSA over decades, the NZ education system has able to graduate above average students over generations.
      Australia also produces a lot of good graduates so they can be offered jobs NZ if needed and the wage covers moving to and living in NZ.
      Projects like this are just about putting NZ on the map and getting a lot of people on social media considering NZ vs any other nation.
      If the job is nice someone in NZ will get it. If the job cannot be covered, someone from Australia can be paid a lot more to fly in.
      Imports from China cover the lower end of the market as ready to use products and services.
      Internet in NZ is optical in areas with plans been offered like a 200Mbps standard network profile.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    33. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      200Mbps products are the result of good telco policy. Select a plan in some areas on fibre optic and enjoy.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    34. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That like any nation would depend on the telco costs, plans and peering. Find a good telco and its good.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    35. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they're on the Long Term Skill Shortages List, so assuming competence and meeting character requirements, they're virtually guaranteed a work visa and a following on residence visa if they apply... :-)

    36. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      The downside is that you *can* experience some pretty horrific latency when accessing stuff that isn't physically located in NZ.
      That's just the laws of physics

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    37. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      He wasn't "let in", he was made there.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    38. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100mbps. But damn... That latency
      --- slashdot.org ping statistics ---
      5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4008ms
      min = 325.516 ms
      avg = 365.801 ms
      max = 406.388 ms

    39. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      200Mbps products are the result of good telco policy.

      Isn't UFB a govt initiative? Fucking socialists and your superior public services...

    40. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by sodul · · Score: 1

      Peter Jackson is from New Zealand as demonstrated by the presence of sheep in his earlier work.

    41. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Even at line-of-sight from Wellington to LA and back is over 60ms at the speed of light.

      --- slashdot.org ping statistics ---
      12 packets transmitted, 12 received, 0% packet loss, time 11014ms
      rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 183.728/186.014/191.790/2.160 ms

      so 180ms isn't too bad considering the cable goes via Auckland then Hawaii and light only goes 2/3rd as fast in fibre.

    42. Re: Do they need Infrastructure People? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I was using NZ dollars, $80USD is $115NZD
      The fibre plans also include phone line too

    43. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      torrent speeds get up to around 10MB/sec, so yes it's pretty close to the full 100mbit

    44. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      100 millibits per second? What's so great about that?

    45. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Where did I say per second? It's 100 millibits per nanosecond

    46. Re:Do they need Infrastructure People? by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      Well done. Your point.

  4. Don't bother - the money is poor and weather shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I lived there for 2 years - it was a waste of time.

    You'll be a paid in NZ Dollars, (currently US$0.71) and a lower amount than if you were working in the USA, Australia or Canada.

    Wellington weather is windy as f*ck and always raining.
    If you're lucky you'll get a few sunny weeks during Summer, if the wind and the freezing water doesn't get to you, the sunburn will.

    Any major city in the world will have more business opportunities than Wellington, the population is so small.

    There's much better opportunities available elsewhere.

  5. MNZGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine that, Americans stealing other people's jobs

    1. Re: MNZGA by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It's about fucking time!

  6. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but the economy is government heavy and doesn't pay their own people very well, which is why they have to beg young American doctors to work (that's how/why my newly-minted psychiatrist cousin lived there for 6 months).

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  7. I thought Kim Jong Dotcom taught us why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should go to the American People's Bitch State of New Zealand?

    It may just be me, but I wouldn't want to work anywhere that sees to glorify in following all of the worst examples from America, and deporting people there, even when charges are obviously being perjured to make an example out of someone, but may I am unique in feeling that way.

  8. Peter Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only do I have those qualifications, but I'm 5' 7"; meaning, the next time Peter Jackson comes looking for folks to play Hobits, I'm there baby!

    So, I'll be helping the economy TWO FOLD! Tech AND Movie!!

  9. Hobbitville by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    I'll do anything as long as it includes a trip to the site where Peter Jackson built the Hobbit town.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Hobbitville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's further north of Wellington outside a place called Matamata.
      But fortunately NZ is small enough that getting there isn't too much hassle.

  10. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... go ahead and scare away the competition. Every hobbit keyboard masher you scare away is one less contender for you to have to compete with :)

  11. Still sounds like a scam by Chas · · Score: 1

    Like one of those "Come here and we'll offer you a high-stress job for well below the going rate because you don't know what cost-of-living is out here!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Still sounds like a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hope a "tech expert" could do basic cost-of-living research.

      If they lowball the offer, and I'm sure the initial offer will be low, just say no. You still got a free trip out of it if it turns out to be a scam.

    2. Re:Still sounds like a scam by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      ...as well as excursions around Wellington.

      So, where would you like to go?
      Let's start with the local shopping mall, some utility companies, and a real estate agent, please!

      A job interview *is* a two way street, you know?

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:Still sounds like a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last one should be entertaining. Property prices in NZ are ridiculously high right now unless you want to buy somewhere in the middle of the earthquake zone in the South Island.

      Mind you, Wellington is also a prime earthquake zone so you might be able to get something really cheap shortly. "As is, where is..."

    4. Re: Still sounds like a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe.

      I wonder though, have you ever been to one of those timeshare, free weekends?

      I wonder just what the free trip will be like. Maybe, you'd wish you paid.

  12. Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Houses and cost of living is cheap, gigabit fibre is available to most of the country. Heaps of amazing countryside within a few hours drive.
    On the other hand Wellington has pretty horrible weather and you will be paid much less that you would in America for the same work, but the lower costs may balance that out.

  13. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good sailing though. That small island supplies a lot of America's Cup yacht racers, although the teams are muddled now that essentially anybody is allowed to sail under any country's flag.

  14. No real engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No electrical? Mechanical? Good luck with your virtual economy when the energy runs out.

  15. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if you love English weather (because just like home!) and still would like to have an easy access to Asian and Australian markets and attractions, what would be a better place? NZ should be able to lure at least few British and Anglo-maniacs with this offer.

  16. Cost of Living and Quality of Life Comparisons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't look like NZ is any cheaper than the US (other than rent), and the average pay is less. So it'd have to be a win for the location, not for financial reasons.

    CoL: US vs. NZ

    For much of the US, the biggest win appears to be a reduction in pollution.

    QoL: Sacramento vs. Wellington

  17. Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Salaries are *low* in NZ.

    The had a lot of socialism, and the resultant lack of economic growth shows in comparison to other countries.

    It's ironic they're paying for people to come over when they have a points based immigration system which stops people from coming over.

    In fact, people are like capital or knowledge - they are a resource. The more you have, the better your economy does, and the more jobs are available.

    All countries, with their controls on immigration, and doing something completely insane from an economics POV.

    1. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The had a lot of socialism, and the resultant lack of economic growth shows in comparison to other countries."

      Good, continuous growth is neither possible nor desirable. That's called "cancer". What should be important is quality of life and activity. Who cares about "growth" when the results of that growth flow away from you anyways?

    2. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Salaries are *low* in NZ.

      Salaries in isolation means nothing unless you're saving up for living somewhere else. Cost of living in NZ is relatively low.

    3. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In fact, people are like capital or knowledge - they are a resource. The more you have, the better your economy does, and the more jobs are available.

      That's unfortunately not how things work. You can't just add an endless stream of unskilled workers to modern economies. These economies are all about getting rid of those jobs.

      In Germany for example corporations started having second thoughts when that whole "cheap labor" thing backfired. Turns out all those "doctors and lawyers" weren't even literate in their own languages. Instead of cheap labor they get increased taxes.

    4. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you go from one $100 landline phone per family to one $600 iPhone per person that is also growth (in $, that's how we measure growth). Doesn't necessarily mean that it requires more natural resources - could be just higher complexity (more labor).
      Continuous growth is easily possible - there is no shortage of resources anyway. Whether it's desirable is up to personal preferences.

    5. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by javaguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Salaries are *low* in NZ.

      Salaries in isolation means nothing unless you're saving up for living somewhere else. Cost of living in NZ is relatively low.

      I'm not sure I agree with this. Housing is expensive, maybe not as bad as some places but there's a housing bubble right now. Finding rental properties can be difficult - according to the news paper 40 people looked at one rental recently. Anything from overseas often has multiple margins added as it goes through multiple distributors, or if you import it yourself shipping fees can be high and the government charges tax and sometimes duties. Food is cheaper in the UK and the USA - sometimes it's cheaper to buy NZ products like cheese and meat overseas than in NZ.

    6. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the landline phone might last decades while smartphones aren't designed to last, especially considering how they've been making bezels thinner and thinner.

    7. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Salaries are *low* in NZ.

      Salaries in isolation means nothing unless you're saving up for living somewhere else. Cost of living in NZ is relatively low.

      Exactly, so that pretty much sees to say not to bother unless you are planning to move to and retire in NZ. That being said, I've known lots of people who want to move to NZ (and a few that have).

    8. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Exactly, so that pretty much sees to say not to bother unless you are planning to move to and retire in NZ

      Not quite. What it means is that don't move if you are supporting overseas expenses. Saving rates can be similar with low pay if cost of living is low. I moved overseas 2 years ago to a country with a lower cost of living and took a $20000 salary cut in the process. Yet at the end of the year my bank account is growing at a rate never seen before, many thanks to not bankrupting myself on my rent and utilities. ... and I'm living in a bigger place too closer to the city.

      Now I will admit that works within a range. I specifically turned down a job in Spain for the same reason because while the cost of living there is even lower the discretionary income at the end was as well.

    9. Re:Salaries are low; NZ is poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about.
      Actually try doing some research before spouting off nonsense.

      http://www.tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/gdp-growth

      Had a lot of socialism?
      America is the largest socialist country in the world in terms of government spending.
      The American military is the largest socialist program in the world, by far.

      Explain the irony of a points based immigration system and trying to get technically skilled people to move here.
      They seem mutually compatible to me, no irony to be seen.

      In closing, you're an idiot.

  18. What if I'm not talented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I'm not really talented but I want the free trip?

        - Homer J. Simpson

    P.S. I've been to the moon

  19. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    I feel like if they are desperate enough to fly you out to NZ for a job interview and show you around for a week, that it would defeat the purpose to get to the salary negotiation part of it and skimp on the dollars there. Cost of living in NZ is quite reasonable. So yeah, if you're constantly thinking of your pay in terms of "what would this buy me if I converted it back to my home currency and spent it at home", then it may seem like a bad deal. But you wouldn't do this purely to bring money home - you'd be spending it locally and enjoying the lifestyle.

    I agree with you on the weather - I actually quite like COLD weather, but the constant wind in Wellington is irritating and makes even mild days feel colder than they are on paper. Having said that, NZ has plenty of beautiful countryside and scenery, and Wellington itself is quite a fun town. Three hour flight from warm beaches and bigger cities in Australia too (Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane).

  20. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The food and grocery stores are crap too. No one from large developed continental cities ever considers that kind of thing of thing but they really notice when they go somewhere with limited selection and human monoculture. I had a friend who didn't stay very long in NZ for exactly this reason.

  21. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Kotukunui · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah! ...and it is illegal to have a private garden. Kiss "Goodbye" to your geraniums if you move here.

  22. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by swb · · Score: 1

    and still would like to have an easy access to Asian and Australian markets and attractions,

    What makes "Asia" any easier to get to from NZ than anywhere else? Aukland-Bangkok is still a 12 hour flight. It's actually less flying time to Santiago, Chile than Bangkok. Once you're at the 12 hour flight duration, you might as well say anywhere is close to anywhere so long as you have access to an international airport.

    My impression is that while New Zealand is has stunning scenery, the people I've met that have been there or live there say it's astonishingly expensive because almost everything has to be imported and the taxes are high. And you're a zillion miles from everywhere except Australia, which I will grant may be a reason to live there.

  23. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Kotukunui · · Score: 1

    Yeah! ...and don't forget the earthquakes! Shake, roll and rattle | When you live in the Capital (that *almost* rhymes)

  24. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by BlueLightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live in NZ, just in Auckland - but I did live just outside of Wellington for part of my childhood. It's rare to see these kinds of comments about living in NZ, but I have seen them, and like the others I've read I have to say I think you may have come with the wrong expectations.

    If you come here expecting that you'll have beautiful weather every day and otherwise it'll be just like back home - payscales and all, you'll be disappointed. It's a place like many others on earth rather than some ethereal wonderland, with advantages and disadvantages. It's not the kind of place where you go and work for big bucks for a short time and then return home with your riches. If you're realistic, recognise that it's somewhat isolated with a small population and therefore the economy is different and some things aren't as easy to find or are more expensive (though nowhere near like it was in the '80s when my family moved here) you can have a very comfortable life. That's completely ignoring the beautiful and varied landscape, outdoor opportunities, etc. - all of that you have heard about is true. Given the choice I wouldn't live anywhere else - and I recently returned here from London, by choice.

    Besides, Wellington is famous for its windy weather, so you could definitely have known about that in advance ;)

  25. Replacing Kim dot com? by sjwest · · Score: 1

    Does this mean 100 tech experts will be extradited to the us as well.

    Whatever you think about kim dot com (stupid name) he did prove that New Zealand will do anything for the US.

    1. Re:Replacing Kim dot com? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Little known fact, most people don't get extradited unless they are believed to have committed a crime. They don't just take random people off the street and ship them to the US to be placed in Guantanamo Bay.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Replacing Kim dot com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Whatever you think about kim dot com (stupid name) he did prove that New Zealand will do anything for the US.

      It is not "New Zealand" that is trying to extradite Kim Dotcom, it is not the government nor the people. It is the U.S. that is trying to extradite him through the New Zealand courts and this has taken over 5 years so far, and is likely to go on for a further two years before it is finally settled. I don't know what you mean by 'will do anything'. In the U.S. people are being picked up and marched over the border (allegedly). That is not happening here.

      http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/89609366/high-court-upholds-kim-dotcom-deportation-order

    3. Re:Replacing Kim dot com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you tell?

    4. Re:Replacing Kim dot com? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Actually, we are still Nuke free inspire of the pressure from the UK, Australia, USA, France. And Dotcom is still fighting his extradition years later and may succeed, our judiciary is far less a political appointment than the USA.

  26. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've lived in wellington for 20 years.
    Wellington has an excess of I.T. people, but are unable to get jobs due to a screwed up government system or an unwillingness to pay a decent amount.
    It already imports a significant number of indians for government jobs pushing out New Zealanders, as they are cheaper (at least through some creative accounting. They don't get paid heaps but thier contracting agencys do).
    Also, we don't have enough houses to put everyone in. House and rent prices are going through the roof with no relief in sight.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/property/89933065/rental-crisis-deepens-as-mt-cook-flat-viewing-attracts-more-than-40-people
    http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/money/2017/02/hot-property-wellington-house-values-up-21-percent-in-2016.html

    What idiot came up with this plan?

    1. Re:Is this a joke? by ukoda · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are after 'I.T' people, they are after tech experts that are in short supply. I would assume it is vertical market roles like embedded systems engineers etc they are after, most of whom have left Wellington for Auckland due the bigger market and higher pay there. If they do their screening right I think this could be a good thing for Wellington.

    2. Re:Is this a joke? by ruir · · Score: 1

      When the definition of IT people is any curious guy that can open a computer and change a graphics card, or install an AV software, or click a mouse, it is pretty natural there are many "IT people" that is not employed.
      It is pretty much the same saying many people in the restaurant business is not employed, and put in the same bag clerks, "cleaning technicians" and chefs.

    3. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in sort of the same boat in Wellington IT. Don't be disappointed if you take the job, go through the hassle of moving all the way to NZ, struggle to find decent accommodation that is within reasonable commuting distance, and then have your job offshored within a couple of years! I'm not saying it's all bad, but there's a handful of companies that need a very specific skillset, and I don't know what kind of job security or benefits they would offer that's different from what these highly skilled engineers can already get elsewhere. Unless you fit within that highly experienced role, management/exec profile, or have specific skills that are severely lacking in the market that would net you more than NZD 150K / year, I'd take this with a grain of salt.

      Do your research and ask as many people as you can. Trends are changing and the government is always years behind what's happening in the market.

    4. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wellington has an excess of I.T. people, but are unable to get jobs due to a screwed up government system or an unwillingness to pay a decent amount.

      If you have an excess of IT people, then it stands to reason wages will be lower. Supply and demand.

    5. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/89095298/Ratepayers-pick-up-bill-for-international-IT-specialists-Wellington-job-hunt

      Some trips for somebody's buddies, ratepayer funded, happens from time to time...
      No biggie, not that much money, pretty much sums up the business attitude, and not just Wellington.

      Wellington Regional Economic Development Agency (WREDA) chief executive Chris Whelan said the cost to bring each candidate to New Zealand for a week would be about $2750.

      This equates to about $275,000 for 100 candidates.

      The agency is investing $300,000 in the campaign.

      WREDA, which combines the economic development activities of Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council, is funded by Wellington ratepayers.

      LookSee Wellington was about giving people, who might be open to moving to this side of the world, a chance to "come and have a look-see" before deciding to relocate, and without having to pay to get here, Whelan said.

      The employer fee - known as a marketing success fee - is written in the employment agreement. It is set at just over $9000 per hire.

      A proportion of each fee will be returned to WREDA as the principal sponsor of the programme.

      "The cost associated with a successful hire is a flat fee that is significantly lower than market rates for conventional recruitment agency selection for mid to senior-level IT professionals," Whelan said.

    6. Re:Is this a joke? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Wellington has an excess of I.T. people... ...an unwillingness to pay a decent amount.

      If you ever do a course in economics you'll learn how these two things are connected...

  27. Probably not hard to figure out who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a very short list of astronauts still around that have walked on the moon. Although amazingly most of you guys live into your 80's, I'm guessing being fit your entire life helps with that.

    I kind of wished at least one of you guys would have ran for President.

  28. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    But if you love English weather (because just like home!) and still would like to have an easy access to Asian and Australian markets and attractions, what would be a better place? NZ should be able to lure at least few British and Anglo-maniacs with this offer.

    NZ is a lot like England culturally, but larger (the size of Colorado), much less populated (4 million vs 65 million), and with better weather and more spectacular scenery. It abounds in species that are too ludicrous even for Australia (the three-eyed lizard, the parrot that collects windshield wipers, the earthworm that glows in the dark, the giant crickets) but while in Australia everything is poisonous, in NZ nothing is poisonous.

  29. Cost of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~5$ US for a gal of gas (measured there in liters of course). ~2300 US for a *nice* 900sqft apartment in the city. ~1286$ US for a normal 900sqft apt. This is crazy high. 1000 US for a normal studio...

  30. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.garden-nz.co.nz/

  31. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    illegal to have a private garden.????

    Since when Hoss?, every second person here has a garden

  32. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you come here expecting that you'll have beautiful weather every day and otherwise it'll be just like back home - payscales and all, you'll be disappointed.

    Besides, Wellington is famous for its windy weather, so you could definitely have known about that in advance ;)

    Sounds like Exmoor, but without the Beast.

  33. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by nervouscat · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it's a great place to hide out if World War III breaks out.

  34. Just got back from Wellington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Yank software engineer who is deciding between New Zeland and Netherlands for immigration. I just returned from spending a few weeks in New Zealand, mainly in Wellington. The technology buzz of Wellington is very real, with lots of startups and a slew of opportunities in the local industry (government).

    Weather was similar to what I experience in the Pacific Northwest.

    Most importantly, the people are smart, decent, and welcoming. And they don't vote for far-right cretins. And when the United States sinks its economy, NZ will still be chugging along.

    1. Re:Just got back from Wellington by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Most importantly, the people are smart, decent, and welcoming.

      Not many Muslims either, which is a definite plus

  35. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Cost of living in NZ is quite reasonable.

    Said no one, ever. My distant cousin is the nearly the top surgeon in the country and didn't want to eat out because it's "too expensive". And while they had a nice house, it wasn't anywhere near what I would expect from the top surgeon in a US state.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  36. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by roca · · Score: 2

    Your last sentence is probably true. Income inequality especially in healthcare isn't nearly as high is in the USA.

    Your second sentence doesn't make sense to me unless your distant cousin is just ridiculously frugal. Lots of middle-class NZers eat out very frequently.

  37. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by roca · · Score: 1

    It is expensive because of imports, but taxes are actually not high. Top income tax rate is 33%, and there's a 12.5% sales tax on almost all goods. (There are no states, therefore no state taxes.) That's significantly lower than the USA especially if you live in a high-tax state like California.

  38. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Dude

    You have a mild maritime or marine climate. Windy or not you do not know the definition of bad weather. In my lifetime I have lived in Las Vegas as well as Alaska and Florida.

    You know that feeling of sticking a hair dryer to your head at the salon? We call that walking outside in Las Vegas in the summer on a nice 112 degree or over 40 if you use Celsius. Now, it gets worse have you imaged what it's like to walk in -40? I do not even have to convert as -40 is the same at both scales (learn something new everyday). All dead and snow and ice for months at a time!

    Maritime climates like New Zealand, UK, and Seattle are nice. North New Zealand is subtropical too and close to Wellington. The mild winters or non existent damp ones with a little wind is Paradise if you ask a Yankee who is not from Pacific Northwest

  39. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by roca · · Score: 1

    It's true that you don't come to New Zealand to maximise earnings. People tend to come here for other reasons, mainly lifestyle.

    The weather in Wellington is terrible. Auckland's a lot better.

    I once met an American neurologist who moved to NZ. She was earning less than half of what she'd been earning in the USA, but was much happier because the healthcare system here is better organised.

    A small number of people have high-paying jobs in NZ that pay commensurately with what they'd get overseas. They tend to work remotely on something very specialized where they're practically irreplaceable.

  40. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    For us liberals who are terrified of Trump it sounds like paradise! I lived in Alaska and miss the nature and beauty but hated the long winters. New Zealand is a rival as that and Antarctica rival the top 3 most amazing places

  41. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the insight. I know someone who moved to Auckland from the UK. He said that it's a slower pace of life, good standard of living with large houses (by UK standards) and quality healthcare.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  42. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    No, the radiation makes it to the southern hemisphere eventually.
    It makes for a miserable 12 months, waiting for certain death.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  43. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by pond0123 · · Score: 1
    Couldn't disagree more with most of it - because as usual, what we each personally value most is a personal decision.

    I emigrated from the UK about 4 years ago. I was born in the North West but studied and subsequently lived in Cambridge - ostensibly a beautiful, historic city, in the South East with good weather compared to the national average, a very diverse and liberal outlook and endless opportunities in the tech sector. I worked for Acorn in my first job - that same Acorn who spun out ARM, albeit before I joined.

    In comparison, Wellington is architecturally often ugly, but also sometimes very architecturally special. The hills and green spaces are outstanding. Public spaces and services are comparatively well maintained and curated. Having sea around so many areas due to the complex coastline is awesome and there are numerous beaches within walking distance, or a short bus or car ride. Speaking of buses, they're great - nothing like the disaster in Cambridge. Traffic gets bad, but it's practically empty compared to the UK. Lots of unique houses and apartments rather than grim mass-produced housing estates; not cheap in these boom times, but still great value compared to Cambridge, even in the CBD. The weather is for sure very windy - one of the windiest cities on Earth - and it can spoil a warm day, but it also means pollution levels are spectacularly low (even though it's not all that bad to start with on a still day) and at times it's just amazing, energising and dramatic as the entire landscape goes into motion.

    Of course it rains, like anywhere; but compared to Manchester UK or Auckland the average rain days per year is, surprisingly, the same. Compared to Cambridge it is temperate - not as hot in summer, nor as cold in winter (rarely below freezing) - suits me very well. North West birthright in the blood I guess. The sun when it's there is amazing, but yes, wear good sunscreen - as you should do anywhere, sunburn or not. Thanks to the specific latitude of NZ and atmospheric filtering the light quality countrywide is spectacular with many days looking like real life has turned the saturation dial "up to 11". NZ really can put on just the most spectacular light shows for dawn or dusk. Flora and fauna are unique and beautiful, the population laid back and sociopolitically engaged, the coffee just about the best in the world, the food not far behind and the on-your-doorstep travel opportunities both up in the North Island, drive-on-drive-off to the South Island via ferry, are amazing. It's up there with world leader in renewable energy, one of the best wine producing countries in the world, organic/biogrow (for the sake of the environment, not because "it's healthier") is strong and well applied, "buy local" is easy and diverse... Just incredible for such a small country population. It really, really punches above its weight.

    If you love the USA, don't move. But the UK got Brexit and May; you got Trump and Brannon; I got a great deal of unfortunate separation from old friends and family in the UK and that hurts, but I traded it for modern, progressive politics (as much as one can really hope for) with mixed-member proportional rep., a truly stunning city, great new friends and a wealth of opportunities I'd never have had in the UK, a wonderful husband and a kick-ass 1900-1909 two storey villa just 20 minutes walk or less than 10 minutes bus from the CBD. Post-brexit, the NZD pay actually now exceeds the best I ever got in the UK too, thanks to the GBP being devalued so far.

    I've never looked back. If you're a strong, competent software engineer that wants to try a few years of something refreshing and new, without much of the heavy cynicism and corruption of "the traditional West" - of course it's there, this place is far, far from perfect, but it's far less invasive or pervasive - then a free pass to Wellington is an astonishing gift. Do it!

  44. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by MortimerGraves · · Score: 2

    No. That particular silliness should perhaps remain on Reddit.

  45. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by MortimerGraves · · Score: 1

    We do have one somewhat poisonous spider, though it's endangered and no one has died from it for over 100 years.

  46. Re: More ....lol....??? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Yes please, bring it on! :)

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  47. Re: may[be] I am unique in feeling that way by slashrio · · Score: 1

    No, you're not.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  48. Windy == Good by Dances+With+Sharks · · Score: 1

    Sounds perfect for me. I've been looking for a place with high tech jobs and good windsurfing and kiteboarding. Last time I checked, tough, NZ didn't have any chip design jobs.

  49. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    You'll be a paid in NZ Dollars, (currently US$0.71)

    News flash: sovereign countries have their own currencies.

    and a lower amount than if you were working in the USA, Australia or Canada.

    This is completely meaningless without an idea of the general level of prices. There are places where you can live like a king on an average Western salary. I'm guessing your idea of an opportunity is amassing a pile of money in a short time and returning home, instead of actually living out there in the world.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  50. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Actually our sales tax is 15% on both goods and services.
    .
    However on the plus side, for consumers prices MUST be advertised/displayed tax inclusive, what you see is what you pay..
    .
    Healthcare is universal, you are not shelling out $$ on health insurance, and the health outcomes are pretty much the same as a the US..
    .
    We have almost no import tariffs , but if you bring in something over NZ$400-600 you can be asked to pay sales tax (15%) on it..
    .
    In most metrics (Welfare, health, education, freedom of speech, democracy, corruption, etc etc etc) New Zealand ranks highly, and sporting wise we do exceptionally well given our (relatively) low population (less than 5 million)..

  51. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the idea of creating a cloud service to store data for users all over the world.

    Do you think I should try it on NZ?

    It seems such a nice idea, what could go wrong?

  52. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Oh, and if you are bringing up kid
    1. We dont have metal detectors on our school doors, there is no need
    2. We don't have school shootings, mall shootings etc
    3. There are huge opportunities for outdoor activities
    4. Its and easy country to get around in
    5. Education system is one of the best in the world
    6. No one has ever gone bankrupt through medical bills, we have universal healthcare that works quite well.

    Weta workshops functions extremely well in Wellington

  53. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Here is a hint. It is very likely they are specifically not after greedy arseholes who will leave the very second another company offers more. They are offering employment to sound sensible people who want quality of life and a job ie work to live not the fucking bullshit of live to work. PS quality of life is not about being some dick, douche bag, poseur.

    Now they are not the most professional or the smartest, otherwise they would have offered a family trip because the 'head'(well, pretend) of that family would have been their best target because they have the greatest motivation for quality of life.

    The smart and somewhat cheeky move would to target the other half of the parenting team via quality of life for the children (certain magazines fit that bill, the ad coupled with local nastiness in that targeted advertising for employees zone).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  54. "free trip" by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Places I've interviewed with always pay the travel costs for the interview. At my current employer we regularly interview people from around the world and paying the costs is a given. If the NZ tech companies have not been paying it so far then no wonder they can't attract people from abroad.

    With that said, NZ is fairly high on my list of places I could accept living in. Not exciting, but comfortable and pleasant.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  55. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Maybe not enough of them are eaten

    --
    Nullius in verba
  56. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Top income tax rate is 33%, and there's a 12.5% sales tax on almost all goods. (There are no states, therefore no state taxes.) That's significantly lower than the USA especially if you live in a high-tax state like California.

    I wouldn't say "significantly lower." Top income tax rate in California (state and federal combined) is around 39 percent, but that's for the top 1 percent of earners. Sales tax varies by location but the state base rate is 7.5 percent and in San Francisco (a very expensive place to live) it's 8.75 percent.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  57. Lovely Place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to live in the wellington region - Upper Hutt which is about a 45 minute commute and the weather is much nicer up the valley - less windy.
    Wellington itself is an awesome little city - population is about 400,000
    I love that an uber is only $10 from the airport into the CBD
    If you want internet, you can get a 100mbit fiber to the home connection almost everywhere in wellington for about USD$75 a month or gigabit for $100

    Wellington isnt like auckland- housing is not as expensive. And you can fly to all other regions of NZ such as queenstown if you want to go for a day or a weekend of skiing. There is heaps to do in the city itself.

    The healthcare system is one of the best in the world in terms of quality of life- its a mostly tax based system that works for everyone

    Taxes in general are not very high - 18-33% depending upon your income. Most are close to the 18% bracket. Sales tax is 15% though all prices for consumer purchase are advertised as tax inclusive so when you go to the supermarket, if you see a 99c tin of baked beans on the shelf, its actually what you pay at the checkout. Income tax is on a PAYE system where your employer pays it for you- so its very simple that most people dont need to fill in a tax return each year.

    The education system is very good too - most primary schools have teachers on a 1:25 ratio, typically with about 350 students at a public suburban primary school. Wellington has a few private schools. Daycare for infants is subsidised by the government by 20 hours free each week.

    Mothers get 18 weeks paid leave and up to 52 weeks extended leave (your job is held open for you or temporarily filled until you return to work) and fathers get 2 weeks, though the parents can share their leave entitlements.

    You get a minimum 4 weeks annual vacation which accrues, and 2 weeks sick leave.

  58. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by MortimerGraves · · Score: 1

    Well, alright then, “venomous”, (though they may be poisonous, I wouldn’t know, I don’t eat arachnids. Not even in MMOs). :)

  59. Bollocks and more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the lot of you - is all I have to say, except those who have positive comments :) and fuck the Wellington City Council for wasting ratepayers money.

    I can tell there were some Aussies commenting, they always bring out the sheep jokes when they have nothing useful or constructive to say, which is often.

    Weather: windy? Well duh, so fucking what. You get used it, it's character building - although we do have ~2,050 sunlight hours a year - keep in mind you get burnt badly, even with sunscreen. At least we are not 3/4 of a mile from the sun like Australia.

    As for the Exchange rate being 0.71 - irrelevent. Think of this, a good cooked breakfast here will cost you NZ$18 - you might get a comparable good breakfast in NYC for US$12 + sales tax (+ US$0.97) + 15% tip ($1.94) = $14.92 (ish) divide that by the exchange rate of 0.71 then that's about NZ$21. Sounds like a shit deal to me.

    It's true that house prices kind of suck right now in the major cities, out in the regions it's way better value.

    How do I know this? I live in Wellington, and work in IT, so I know the market, environment, and am well aware of the talent.

    At risk of sounding parochial, we don't need any overly self-indulged asshats from overseas for this, we have a wealth of talent here in NZ that is doing great things already. "Experts" are not in short supply.

    If you want to come to NZ for reals and not with some false expectation you'll be treated as some sort of god and get paid zillions, then: Come enjoy our phat internets (almost everywhere), excellent food, fine wine, awesome craft beers, and low corruption-perception-index society.

    Nau Mai, Haere Mai!

  60. Another Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the IT jobs posted are contract. Some with only 2 months of on-site work!!!! WTH, move to NZ and only have a job for 2 months. It would probably take me 1 month to move. If I were to consider this I would want 5 years minimum, less than that No Thanks! Not worth the trouble.

  61. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is completely meaningless without an idea of the general level of prices.

    The prices are higher than Palo Alto. The pay is less than 1/3. You figure it out.

  62. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    "good standard of living with large houses (by UK standards)"

    You probably mean London standards, when I looked at moving to NZ I couldn't get anywhere near the same size house for equivalent money as I have in the UK. It was one of the things that put me off, knowing I'd have to downsize to move there.

  63. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's the large number of mostly Chinese we have here means there is a strong cultural influence with Asia. You're right, it's not rational -- BKK is further than EZE; but nevertheless we 'think' ourselves closer to Asia than South America; because we have more trade and immigration with Asia. (There are probably dozens of flights from Auckland to Japan, China (on various airlines), Singapore (at least two a day - both Air NZ and Singapore Air's A380s), Thailand and Hong Kong every day out of Auckland, but only about two to south America.)

    We have 'easy access' to the markets in Asia due to constant government trade deals and suchlike going on -- there's just been more contact with Asia.

    We think ourselves closest to the Pacific, of course (Auckland is the world's largest Polynesian city; flights to Cook Islands, Fiji, Samoa, Tonga are all unremarkable; heck, in my high school you could almost get by speaking Samoan instead of English; and almost can in parts of southern Auckland..)

    But it's more cultural and perception than actual distance; coupled with current actual traveller volumes being higher in the south pacific and asia.

  64. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but the economy is government heavy and doesn't pay their own people very well...

    True, but money isn't everything

  65. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say "significantly lower." Top income tax rate in California (state and federal combined) is around 39 percent..

    Except the NZ top rate kicks in at $49kUSD ($70k NZD) compared to $418k in the US.

  66. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    when I looked at moving to NZ I couldn't get anywhere near the same size house for equivalent money as I have in the UK. It was one of the things that put me off, knowing I'd have to downsize to move there.

    Got any examples to compare? Google tells me the average house size in the UK is 76m2 compared to 205m2 in NZ.

  67. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by wyHunter · · Score: 1

    Plus, since all liberals seem to be terrifed that Mr. Trump will start a global ICBM war, I'd think Enzed would be a great place for you!

  68. 100MBit? Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tubes are all new, and they're fibre.

    Most people get 100mbit. It's between $60 and $100 depending if you can live with a data cap or not. You can get up to 1g. My ISP offers a plan where "you should see 700 - 900Mbps" down and 400 - 450 up for $140

    Of course fibre isn't available everywhere in NZ, but it is pretty much everywhere in Wellington.

    I'm in Eastbourne, which is 25min drive and 11km from the CBD, and even closer to Hutt City

    It is the best place to live in Wellington:-) with great amenities and a really nice environment if you like the outdoors, yet not far from 2 cities.

    But, no 100Mbit here - not scheduled here until 2019.

  69. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

    I know someone who moved to Auckland from the UK. He said that it's a slower pace of life, good standard of living with large houses (by UK standards) and quality healthcare.

    That fits with my experience also. It's a massive generalisation but I also find people are a bit more relaxed here about everything - perhaps that has to do with the pace of life, but I think it's kind of a cultural thing as well.

    One comment - houses here are generally larger than your average home in the UK, but much more poorly insulated. A good percentage of houses in the UK have double glazing, but you rarely see that here. The result is you spend a bunch on heating during the winter or get used to having a cold house, particularly if you're renting and can't take other measures. Having said that the houses I have lived in here have been built in the '70s or the '80s, newer builds may be better on average. You certainly can get double glazing and put in proper insulation, but although I've not actually checked I suspect the fact that few put in double glazing means that it's more expensive here on average than the UK.

  70. As a escaped kiwi.... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Go read e2nz.org, laudafinem.org and related sites.

    NZ - 100% pure bullshit.

    1. Re: As a escaped kiwi.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha... you wouldn't happen to be a moderator of said blog would you? I've read it - man, majority of those people have serious issues (beyond NZ!)

  71. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    There's a ripoff mentality on imports due to past high taxes and crony deals with "import licensing" - it's not uncommon to be able to buy 4-5 copies of software from the USA and have it delivered with taxes paid, for less than the cost of a single copy from local distributors.

    The population is extremely parochial, with a constant need to be assured their country is the best in the world and a nasty tendency to turn violent if told it's not.

    The population is 4 million, but there are 6 million passport holders.

    There's a legend of being "clean, green and corruption free" - the country is none of these (it might have been in the 1950s but the legend died by the 1970s, but it's sold so heavily the population believe it - which allows corrupt police to pretty much anything they want - the spirit of Gene Hunt is alive and well in kiwiland.

    If you want an example of how corrupt the country is, read the latest court judgement in the Kim Dot Com case. You'll be sitting gobmacked at how blatent it is in the proceedings and the judgement. It's all-but-explicitly admitted _by the prosecution_ that Hollywood was driving the case.

  72. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the shitty standards for insulation, etc in NZ housing.

    It's one of those countries where no matter how much heating you have, you'll feel cold indoors - and the locals will tell you "Suck it up and wear a jumper"

  73. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    "Windy or not you do not know the definition of bad weather"

    NZ is smack in the middle of the Roaring Forties and the only other land that far south is Patagonia. The type of weather - and the rapid changes in it - can easily kill someone who was expecting a nice sunny day in a matter of hours - and regularly does.

    The bigger problem is the parochiality of the inhabitants. That friendliness is skin deep and try as you might, as a foreigner (or an intellectual) you will never be accepted as a New Zealander. If you are a tall poppy, you will be cut down to size or driven out of the country.

    This is the reason it's been in the top4 (usually top2) for youth suicide rate (12-24 years) in the western world for the last 50 years

  74. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Tell you what? I will visit your country and you visit Alaska (not in the summer) or Chicago in the middle of winter? :-)

    Wind, snow, and you can tell the temperature on how quick the snots freeze up your nose. 6F which is around -10F you can feel your nostrils turn crunchy fun stuff :-)

  75. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    That's one of those cultural things and is true in most countries. I grew up in such a country and find buildings in North America and some European countries ridiculously stuffy and overheated in winter. It just depends on what you grew up with I guess.

    I live in the US now but keep my indoor temperature at 18/19 C at most (65-66 ish F), and yeah, wear a jumper. I sometimes crank it to 20 C / 68 F if I have guests coming around hehe.

  76. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    I grew up in New Zealand. Ice on the _inside_ of windows in winter wasn't uncommon and as well as being cold, New Zealand housing is _damp_, with mould being a constant problem.

  77. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    Yes, like I say, my own first hand circumstances. The problem is that I don't live in an average UK house because I'm willing to commute 45 minutes to work, this takes me out of the extremely small flats and apartments in which the majority of the UK's population lives (hence why the UK has a low average house size) into the realm of 5 bedroom detached houses for the exact same price.

    The UK's average house size is grossly skewed by it's average high population density fed by large cities like London, whilst New Zealand's is boosted by it's average low population density enhanced by large rural areas inhabited by a much smaller number of people. To put numbers to this, the UK's average population density is 425 per km^2 whereas New Zealand is only 15 per km^2, hence why the average house size is bound to be incredibly skewed in New Zealand.

    To find an equivalent job I'd likely have to move to Auckland, and Auckland's housing market had far more in common with that of London than rural England, similarly as a much newer country, New Zealand doesn't seem to have the level of transport links the UK has. As such for a 45 minute commute I could not in a city like Auckland get anywhere near as large a house as I could in an equivalently sized city like, say, Birmingham in the UK.

    I'm not disputing that New Zealand has larger houses on average - of course it does, if we all opted to become sheep farmers then we could have massive houses with massive amounts of land, but that's not everyone's circumstance. In my circumstance to replicate my standard of living in New Zealand by replicating or improving upon my current job I'd have to downsize my house. Averages only tell the full story if we're working on the principle that everyone fits the average, they don't, and as such not everyone will be able to upsize by moving to New Zealand - I was looking at having to go from a decent size two story 5 bedroom detached house to a single story 2 - 3 bedroom detached house last time I looked about 6 months ago in the Auckland region where I could get an equivalent financial services software development job unless I was willing to pay much more.

    The average house size therefore is only a useful gauge of determining whether everyone could improve their living space size by moving to New Zealand if we're working on the assumption that either no one needs a job, or everyone can and is willing to do any job - I could expand my house size moving to New Zealand if I was willing to instead run a sheep farm for example, but I can't if I'm to maintain my current salary as a software developer in the financial services sector.

  78. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    I was looking at having to go from a decent size two story 5 bedroom detached house to a single story 2 - 3 bedroom detached house last time I looked about 6 months ago in the Auckland region where I could get an equivalent financial services software development job unless I was willing to pay much more.

    Your issue is not one of house size, but public transport options, which of course will always be worse in a smaller, lower density location.
    Where I live (not NZ) also has shit public transport options, so I ride a motorbike. You can move a lot further out to the bigger houses when you expand your transport options into the faster, more agile vehicle categories :)

  79. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    I don't think you can realistically de-link the two, at the end of the day the size of house I can get for my money in New Zealand is necessarily bound by the quality of transport infrastructure and geography to be much smaller than what I can get in the UK.

    Anything else is just theoretical, and I see little point about arguing that I could get a bigger house in New Zealand if some theoretical boxes were ticked, but they're not, so it doesn't change the reality that a move to New Zealand would require a downsize.

    The fact is this would effect a lot of people - yes, someone living in London will do better moving to somewhere like Auckland for sure, but as we learnt the hard way with Brexit, not everyone lives in high density cities like London as it was the constant ignorance of the suburban and rural communities that won the day for the hard and far right that have pushed for Brexit for so long.

    That's all I was taking issue with - the idea that you'll inherently get a bigger house by moving to New Zealand - sure, if you live in London or some similar high density UK inner city area, but there's the whole of the rest of the country outside of London so it's an astoundingly ignorant comment to make. Whether the reason is public transport or not doesn't really matter, the point remains the same, the practical reality is that for many millions of people in the UK a move to New Zealand would require a substantial downsize.

  80. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    I don't think you can realistically de-link the two,

    Of course you can, as I stated if you look beyond public transport as you only transport option. I live more than 45 public transport minutes from my office, but I cut that travel time in half by riding a motorbike. By doing this, I get a bigger house, and you could too.

    That's all I was taking issue with - the idea that you'll inherently get a bigger house by moving to New Zealand - sure, if you live in London or some similar high density UK inner city area, but there's the whole of the rest of the country outside of London so it's an astoundingly ignorant comment to make.

    The average house size in Britain outside of London is only 89m2: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/u...
    I don't even know how you squeeze 3 bedrooms into 89m2.
    As I said in my original response, do you have examples you could provide? Because I think your opinion is not based on reality.

  81. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    "Of course you can, as I stated if you look beyond public transport as you only transport option. I live more than 45 public transport minutes from my office, but I cut that travel time in half by riding a motorbike. By doing this, I get a bigger house, and you could too."

    Right, but that means giving up the ability to do anything on my commute, so it's already causing a difference in terms of quality of life meaning we're no longer comparing like for like. Even outside of public transport though there are still major issues with traffic in Auckland.

    "The average house size in Britain outside of London is only 89m2: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/u...
    I don't even know how you squeeze 3 bedrooms into 89m2. "

    Well you've failed at reading comprehension here - the article says the average size of a new build three bedroom home is 89m^2. That ignores the fact that there are also plenty of 4 bedroom and upwards new build homes that are much larger coupled with a vast amount of existing housing stock that is also much larger. You've gone from using misleading stats, to now completely and utterly mis-representing stats. New build three bedroom homes are small because the government has been creating massive financial incentives for house building companies to build "affordable housing". The fact that building companies have then gone on to take those incentives and build "affordable housing" shouldn't really surprise anyone. It still says nothing about the average house size outside the UK's high density cities like London though which is drastically higher as evidence by my very own plot, the price I paid for it, and the price it's worth now.

    "As I said in my original response, do you have examples you could provide? Because I think your opinion is not based on reality."

    Yes, I provided one, the fact you choose to ignore it doesn't make me wrong, it makes you wilfully ignorant. I pointed out that I have a 5 bedroom detached house (we don't work on m^2 in the UK so I've never bothered to measure it, but it's like any decent sized detatched 5 bedroom house - good size kitchen, utility room, living room, dining room, double garage, en-suite, bathroom, study, sizeable attic for storage etc.). To move to Auckland to get an equivalent standard of living I can only get a 3 bedroom single floor detached house for the same money. This isn't just some guesswork or something, this was based on an actual plan to move coupled with thorough investigation of the housing, work, and commute options, before discovering this reality, that I wouldn't actually be able to have the same standard of living by moving there. A move to NZ is great for relatively unskilled workers because you can just move to rural New Zealand where they need plumbers, brick layers and so forth and get a massive increase in the standard of living, but for people like me with a very specific, sought after but in limited geographic areas, well paid skillset, I can't do better by going to New Zealand, I have to downsize, or pay substantially more.

    Whether you want to listen to my anecdote or not is really irrelevant, it doesn't change the reality. Bask in wilful ignorance if you want by denying that reality, but that's not really my problem.

    I'll give you a hint though, if New Zealand was this perfect wonderland, where everything is unquestionably better, then why are they working so hard to get people like me over and have been for decades? If it was so clear cut they'd have closed their skill shortage long ago - they haven't because people like me realise the dream falters a bit when it collides with reality. If you want to keep on dreaming though, then go for it. I haven't given up completely on the idea of moving to get out of this increasingly shit country, but whether it's New Zealand or somewhere else is now a lot more up in the air - when I first thought about it New Zealand was the clear cut choice until I looked into the reality of it.

  82. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    but for people like me with a very specific, sought after but in limited geographic areas, well paid skillset, I can't do better by going to New Zealand

    I have no problem with this, your case is unusual. But you implied that this is also the case for 'many millions' of others Brits, which I don't think it is.

  83. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    It's the case for many millions of other Brits because you still have well over 30 million people living outside the big cities and the majority of them do so because they can get bigger houses there than they can in the cities. The idea that commuters like me are rare and unusual is simply false, villages such as that I live in are almost entirely populated by people like me, the exceptions are the local plumber, the local post office owner, a couple of farmers, and the local shop owner. Rural Britain is absolutely full of these commuters villages now, and these commuter villages are in high demand and also full, to the extent that the government has been outright planning areas of green belt to be built on to build new garden towns for commuters.

    Of those people living in villages such as mine, there are of course some who could benefit from a move to New Zealand - the farmers, the plumber and so forth, but for the majority of us living in these villages they're still going to be in the exact same situation as me.

    So yes, for someone stuck in the painfully small accommodation in inner city areas New Zealand is going to be a fantastic improvement in quality of life for them - but here's the problem, so is moving to a commuter city in the UK. If like me, you've already done that, then the jump to New Zealand just isn't that great and again, yes, there most definitely are millions of Brits living in commuter towns like I do simply because it's the only way you can get a decent sized house without being a multi-millionaire.

    Again, I think you're basing your understand of life in the UK on arbitrary averages found in publications that are far from scientific, and that's misguiding your understanding of what life is like in the UK.

    For what it's worth the problem I have with moving isn't just with New Zealand - my wife is Canadian so we considered moving there too, but I don't want to deal with the shit winters they get, so Western Canada is the best bet, and yet Vancouver has the exact same house price problems that Auckland does.

    So many people move countries without thinking it through or looking into it, and then just end up moving back to their place of origin within a year or two, and it's precisely because of the type of issue I'm describing here - it's not always as straightforward and inherently great as people think. There are compromises - for me, if I do move to New Zealand I will be accepting that decrease in house space, but I'll be living in a country with a far more progressive political climate, with far greater future prospects, far better schooling if we decide to have kids, and for me, better weather and far better places to scuba dive. As I said - it's not that I'm saying NZ is bad or doesn't have it's upsides, just that house space isn't one of them and yes, that does in fact apply to the millions of us Brits who already have nice houses in commuter towns which the government is building more of because of demand.

  84. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    So many people move countries without thinking it through or looking into it, and then just end up moving back to their place of origin within a year or two, and it's precisely because of the type of issue I'm describing here

    I think you've highlighted the real issue here. Some people are more adventurous and will do anything for the experience and are willing to put up with more to get out and about and do new things.
    You might be one of them, but based on the amount of Brits I see absolutely everywhere I go around the world, a lot of your country-people aren't as timid.

  85. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    Again, I think you're making assumptions. Britain is without a doubt a nation full of travellers, but again a massive portion of the population doesn't travel, which is precisely why a majority voted for Brexit - those people who voted for Brexit are, the vast majority of the time, precisely the type of people who are poorly travelled. Those people weren't bothered by things like the currency tanking because they rarely step outside their own little neighbourhoods, let alone the country. These are your classic little England types.

    I'm an internationalist by any measure, that is in my blood precisely because I am well travelled, and precisely because I do hate this country and like taking every opportunity I can to leave it. I also couldn't get away with being timid even if I wanted to; when you reach senior levels in business you just can't get away with that. I've hiked inside the arctic circle, I've dived multiple places throughout 4 of the 5 oceans, and I've discovered new populations of plant species in South America and I'm barely into my 30s. I've no problem with travelling and being adventurous but to do that requires disposable income.

    So it's precisely for that reason the idea of spending more on my mortgage to get an equivalently sized house in New Zealand and in turn sacrificing my ability to travel put me off the idea of moving in the first place. By staying here I keep my standard of living including my ability to travel to the places I've always wanted to go (Scuba diving in places like the Galapagos isn't a cheap past time), which is precisely my point - if I move to NZ and get an equivalently sized house I sacrifice precisely the ability to travel.

    You seem to be stabbing in the dark with all sorts of ideas to justify why you think it's correct to assume that moving from the UK to New Zealand will always leave you better off, whilst missing the more obvious resolution to your paradox - that your preconceived notion is simply incorrect. Most such emigration myths are based on the classic fallacy of believing the grass is always greener, but as always the reality is far more nuanced.

    As an aside, you may start seeing less Brits when you travel going forward, certainly in France last August, and the West Indies a few weeks ago there were far less of my fellow countrymen than I'm used to seeing. There were more Americans than usual, presumably because of the currently over-valued dollar.

  86. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Gussington · · Score: 1

    You seem to be stabbing in the dark with all sorts of ideas to justify why you think it's correct to assume that moving from the UK to New Zealand will always leave you better off,

    Um you got it ass backwards. You said there's many millions of Brits just like you. I never said always, in fact I specifically called out the rare cases where it might not be so. The point I was making was that for most Brits, houses are on average bigger and cost less. Of course it's not true in 100% of cases, but you didn't even give one to back up your claim

    Most such emigration myths are based on the classic fallacy of believing the grass is always greener,

    Most people I know who moved (and I know a fair few) moved because they wanted to try something different. Not to do exactly the same thing, or a perception of a better life, merely something that is more interesting. You are clearly not one of them, you've made that point clear.

  87. Re:Don't bother - the money is poor and weather sh by Xest · · Score: 1

    "Most people I know who moved (and I know a fair few) moved because they wanted to try something different. Not to do exactly the same thing, or a perception of a better life, merely something that is more interesting. You are clearly not one of them, you've made that point clear."

    Nonsense, you're still grasping at straws. Your whole argument is based on the misguided assumption that if you want an equivalent quality of life then you're not wanting to do something different. That's patently false, it's possible to still want the same size house, the same salary, and same commute to work whilst indulging in a completely different culture and lifestyle outside of that.

    You're fundamentally wrong - people don't move to do something different, they move to make their lives better. Sometimes, that involves changing everything, like moving from a cramped inner city London flat to a much larger accommodation in New Zealand, for less money. In other cases, that means maintaining the same high level of living and salary, whilst achieving a better work life balance, better weather, a better political climate, a friendlier culture, and a much more fulfilling lifestyle outside of work.

    People only move to change absolutely everything, when absolutely everything in their life is shit. That's not the case for everyone, some of us have no problem with some elements of their lives, but still wish to change others. You're ironically making judgements about my travelling experiences, my acceptance of change and so forth without having any idea about me, and in turn you're getting your entire points completely and utterly wrong as a result.

    As I said before, you're just grasping at straws to try and tell yourself that you're correct, and failing miserably at every turn because the simple fact is that you are instead completely wrong. You tried to defend a comment that was simply false - a suggestion that a move to NZ will always leave you with a bigger house, I've explained why that's not true, and if you still don't want to accept it that's fine. But at least recognise the irony in suggesting someone doesn't like change, when you can't even change your mind about whether you were correct about something so utterly trivial as a minor point made on the internet.