Slashdot Mirror
California Government On the Dangers of Cellphones (cbslocal.com)
mi quotes a report from CBS Local: After keeping it hidden for years, California's Department of Public Health has released a draft document outlining health officials' concerns about cellphone radiation exposure. The previously unpublished document was released this week after a judge indicated she would order the documents be disclosed. Health officials' overall recommendation is to "increase the distance between you and your phone" by using a headset, the speaker phone function and text messaging. Health officials recommend not sleeping near your phone and not carry it in your pocket or directly on your body, unless it is off. The fact sheet also states that "EMFs can pass deeper into a child's brain than and adult's" so suggests parents limit their child's cellphone use to texting, important call and emergencies.
If that's the case, then the entire human race needs to move to the bottom of salt mines, because the amount of radiation being produced by the sun ought to fry our brains by the time we're six months old.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
How many times are we going to go through the whole cellphone radiation thing?
Recently there was a story here about a room that can charge any device that enters into it. I cannot wait to see the health issues that arise from that.
I'm so confused....
That said, RF is dangerous depending on signal strength and exposure time. I don't, out of long time habits instilled in the Military, keep a cell phone by my head. I use headphones. Can the body tolerate the cell phones? Probably, but it's kind of like eating bacon. It tastes really good but in large quantities is not very healthy. Everything in moderation was coined quite wisely.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Cell phones use electromagnetic RADIATON for communicaton. This cause cancer.
That may be what a few 'health officials' think but I have it on the authority of actual Slashdotters that cell phones are perfectly safe because radiation and the Sun and the Earth and stuff.
Protecting rats from cancer since 2007.
Have gnu, will travel.
How about the California government worry instead about aqueduct maintenance?
You guys have a serious water shortage, but you cant even keep your aqueducts from overflowing. Seriously. But lets worry about electromagnetic radiation, a byproduct of nature that filled every point in the entire cosmos for the entire time mankind has existed.
"His name was James Damore."
... tablets on or about the body, using WiFi, which produces the exact amount of _____. (Hint: EMF)
Health officials recommend not sleeping near your phone and not carry it in your pocket or directly on your body ...
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
This was a draft document someone whipped up that wasn't used because there were no facts to back it up. It wasn't "hidden", it just wasn't used.
Given multiple other studies have already concluded that there actually is no danger from EMR, I seems this must necessarily prove one of:
a) every one of those other studies were wrong or have been corrupted, presumably by "big telco"
or
b) CA are just a bunch of ultra-paranoid wingnuts that want to live in fear.
So which is it actually?
If that's the case, then the entire human race needs to move to the bottom of salt mines, because the amount of radiation being produced by the sun ought to fry our brains by the time we're six months old.
Hey, the science is settled!
"After keeping it hidden for years, California's Department of Public Health...
It's pretty fucking bad when you can't even make it through the first fucking sentence of TFS before wanting to dial a damn lawyer.
You had one fucking job to do, Department of Health .
This bullshit, coming from the land that gave birth to "known to the state of California to cause" warning labels.
Fucking hell.
(A) Californians are wingnuts, which causes increased fear of nonionizing radiation and desire for more transgender washrooms in schools. -or-
(B) Cellphone radiation intreracts with sea salt to actually harm childrens' brains, causing increased number of transgender children and peanut allergies in California and New York.
My Siemens Si35i's battery already limits my cellphone to texting, important calls and emergencies. That is, if you can limit your speech to 2 seconds max. Other than that, it's texting. Fortunately, my cellphone provider will allow me to text landlines, converting the text into some robot-voiced automated voice message. Most recipients think you are pulling their leg.
Replacement batteries (whlie they were available) lasted few months, then it was back to the original one again (which had to serve for decades and is now close to retiring without replacement).
Cell Phones and Cancer Fact Sheet
"Exposure to ionizing radiation, such as from x-rays, is known to increase the risk of cancer. However, although many studies have examined the potential health effects of non-ionizing radiation from radar, microwave ovens, cell phones, and other sources, there is currently no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk (1).
"The only consistently recognized biological effect of radiofrequency energy is heating. The ability of microwave ovens to heat food is one example of this effect of radiofrequency energy. Radiofrequency exposure from cell phone use does cause heating to the area of the body where a cell phone or other device is held (ear, head, etc.). However, it is not sufficient to measurably increase body temperature, and there are no other clearly established effects on the body from radiofrequency energy."
Sleep easily next to your smartphone tonight.
This post is known to the State of California to cause cancer
Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
Are we getting an early start on this or something?
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Sadly I can't find it now, but I definitely remember reading a study that found for radiation exposure, using wired headphones when your phone was transmitting (i.e. during a call) was actually significantly worse than holding the phone to your head, because the headphone wires/headphones themselves directly conducted the EM radiation straight into your ear canals.
A few subtle warnings over the next few years, And finally: A warning label on the side of the phone.
This one will easily get into the tens of trillions of dollars.
Back in the day I was a shop TV repairman and spend pretty much every work day for 20 years behind a CRT console TV on the bench ... on. Now if you have never been behind a CRT TV, let me tell you there's all kind of crap going on inside that thing. I'm sure the radiation levels I was exposed to was FAR greater than a cell phone. My brain is fine, the rest of my body is fine, my kids (all conceived after my repairman career) are fine. This is pure BS.
The referenced draft document simply states that IF you are concerned about it, here's how to reduce exposure. It doesn't state that RF exposure is dangerous.
In fact the National Cancer Institute says the opposite:
What the study showed: No association was observed between cell phone use and the incidence of glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma, even among people who had been cell phone subscribers for 13 or more years
This is why everybody around me seems to come off like drooling idiots! It's the cell phones! They really ARE cooking the brains! Lets call it a disease, and sell the plebs some medication.... you know for "symptoms"
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
If cellphones were truly harmful to brain function, I think we would have seen the world gradually getting dumber and dumber up to the present day.
Hey, wait a minute ...
Does that mean that you should stand outside uncovered in 110 degree sunny weather for hours at a time every day? How about standing in front of a microwave transmitter at the minimum safe distance for a prolonged time every day? Your point is both irrational and illogical.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Break childrens reliance on cellphones through health fearmongering. Brilliant! Wish I'd thought of it.
I was radiated with cell phone energy from 2001 to 2007 and my MRI showed brain damage.
Motorola Engineers also sued Motorola for Brain Cancer from testing cell phones.
If U put cell phone on your lap while driving, you might get testicle/scrotem cancer.
Also, if U R far from the tower, the cell phone will increase the energy used to your brain. Make sure you have full BARS and VOIP home phone.
What is particularly ironic is that the same people who obsess over the possible health effects of cellphone radiation will send their children outside to play in the sunshine without a moment's thought ... to be exposed to ionizing radiation that causes about 10,000 deaths per year from melanoma in the U.S. alone.
Which are you?
That does the damage. If you beam the same W/m2 continuously you won't do much damage apart from local heating up of tissues. Pulse the damage in a way similar to neurons - aka digital - and you'll start forming disease.
How many Billions of cell phones are there in the wild today? How many Billion more will be made and sold tomorrow? How much more than $1 has been made in profit on each? How much do you think human lives are worth to those making and regulating cell phones?
Chewing at power cords will eventually increase the chances of getting cancer, there's a lot of chemicals in them.
That is, if you survive electrocution.
Interestingly, it looks like certain wavelengths of visible light can kill bacteria. This radiation should be non-ionizing, and I doubt it's doing the killing due to heating effects (it happens in the fridge). So are we certain that non-ionizing radiation can't damage DNA/RNA?
http://www.digitaltrends.com/home/blue-purple-light-kill-bacteria/
Always love seeing those labels "The product is known to the State of California to contain chemicals that may cause cancer." Nobody else knows, though, which should tell you everything you need to know about the State of California thinking they're smarter than its citizens who wouldn't be able to go about their lives without the State telling them to.
A flat, smooth metal square someone can stand on. The same metal, shaped with jagged edges, would slice the person to bits. Digital energy pulsed in non-smooth, broken waveforms, creates jagged energy environments. Notice remote charging? This is possible because the particular arrangement and timing of pulses differs from smooth analog waves. The digital wifi differs from simple analog emf in the same way that a smooth metal square differs from a serated knife edge.
of course, other microwave frequencies will, as well. Nothing special about 2.45 GHz, other than being an ISM frequency.
Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
Cancer causes cell phones
Remote charging is possible with "smooth analog waves" and the rest of your post is equally crap.
Does your asshole still hurt? Stop your fucking whining already. trump won. GET OVER IT!
My uncle worked at a large reputable company producing cell phones. He mentioned that they did extensive studies on the health effects of cell phones and never encountered any issues. They were actually trying to prove it caused harm so they could find ways to then solve it, but were never able to produce any results that suggested that it did.