Slashdot Mirror


This Is How the Number 3.14 Got the Name 'Pi' (time.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Time article: Ancient research on real numbers likely "didn't get improved upon until the age of Newton," says John Conway, mathematics professor emeritus at Princeton University who once won the school's Pi Day pie-eating contest. Sir Isaac Newton recorded 16 digits of pi in 1665, later admitting that he was "ashamed" of how long he had worked on the computations, as it meant that he had "no other business at the time," per the MAA. It was not until the 18th century -- about two millennia after the significance of the number 3.14 was first calculated by Archimedes -- that the name "pi" was first used to denote the number. In other words, the Greek letter used to represent the idea was not actually picked by the Ancient Greeks who discovered it. British mathematician William Jones came up with the Greek letter and symbol for the figure in 1706, and it was popularized by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, Catherine the Great's mathematician, a few decades later. "Euler was a much better mathematician than the people who used [pi] before, and he wrote very good textbooks," says Conway. "He used it because the Greek letter Pi corresponds with the letter 'P'... and pi is about the perimeter of the circle."

133 comments

  1. First Post by rjune · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where's my pie for first post?

    1. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't duck when I throw it next time. Now the guy behind you with custard all over his face is looking at me saying "Why, you..."

    2. Re:First Post by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's interesting, because despite Euler's official story about perimeter, the English spelling of 'pie' was very much in use at the time, and as everybody knows, if you hold '3.14' up to a mirror, it spells 'PIE'.

      Not that math geeks would ever abide in-jokes.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a PIe you id:10ts. Pi is not read as [ai] it is read a [i] only.

    4. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy (sad clown that he is) was Steve Bannon - https://www.dropbox.com/s/99d8...

    5. Re: First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody pronounces it "pee"
      in English. You are the idiot.

      If you are speaking Greek, feel free to pronounce it "pee."

      Just like in English we say "Aristotle", not "Aristoteles". It's neither good nor bad, it just is.

    6. Re:First Post by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Wow - I had never seen the 3.14 in a mirror thing before! Thanks.

    7. Re: First Post by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      That's a shame really, because if we pronounced it as "pee" nobody would make any jokes about it.

    8. Re:First Post by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm "Oh, shut your pie hole already!"

    9. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to love 5318008 when you work out what to do (hint no mirrors needed)

  2. Cool story, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the next article be about Ada Lovelace and the difference engine, or about Stallman's printer driver story?

    1. Re:Cool story, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Us republicans don't believe in the infinite entitlement;
      the number represented by pi does repeat. Just 'cause
      we won't see it repeat in our lifetimes, doesn't mean it won't
      That's a strawman's argument the thought of infinity...

      CAP === 'ambush'

    2. Re:Cool story, bro by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What exactly had Lovelace to do with the Difference Engine?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Cool story, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, ignore completely the person that designed and created the difference engine. Just focus on some rich twat who was interested in it.

    4. Re:Cool story, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrote serious programs for it and expository articles about it.
      Jeez, my original comment was making fun of the idea of telling Slashdotters basic stuff about the history of pi.
      I had no idea historical ignorance had reached such a level around here.

    5. Re:Cool story, bro by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The Difference Engine was not a universal computer. It was a polynomial evaluator. You couldn't write "serious programs" for it. Jeez, I had no idea historical ignorance had reached such a level around here!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Even Newton knew that, as per TFA.

  4. Cuz pi are round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why else?

    1. Re:Cuz pi are round by Golddess · · Score: 3, Funny

      Haven't you heard? Pie aren't round, pie are squared.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    2. Re:Cuz pi are round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, cornbread are square, pie are round!

    3. Re:Cuz pi are round by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

      That would be a great joke if the plural of pie was pie.

    4. Re:Cuz pi are round by Sorny · · Score: 1

      pi are square is wrong! pi are round. cornbread are square. -stolen from Mitch Hedberg.

      --
      OSX pwns.
    5. Re:Cuz pi are round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Pie aren't round, pie are squared.

      No pie are round.. Cobbler are squared.

  5. Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a sham.

    Everyone knows tau is a better representation.

    1. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tau is greater than pi

      Yes, but Tau Beta Pi is filled with great minds.

    2. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Jamu · · Score: 1

      Also tau is the whole pie, whereas pi is half pie.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    3. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      no tau is 2 pie so it is better.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Software · · Score: 2

      If you're going to mention tau, you have to provide a link. http://tauday.com/tau-manifest...

    5. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tau is a better representation until you actually get to more involved real world applications than calculating the area of a circle, like structural analysis where the formulas using tau would be vastly more complicated.

    6. Re:Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineers use 2pi a fair bit as it happens, probably because they concentrate more on a part's diameter than the radius. To this day I still automatically use pi.d^2/4, it just stuck with me.

    7. Re: Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Evidence, please!

      Especially with anything involving cycles, tau is a little more natural.

      Not that the difference is much between pi and tau, which is why we'll never switch to tau from pi.

    8. Re: Tau is greater than pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means they occasionally cancel out a two in the denominator, ignoring the hilarious powers of two in equations with powers of pi.

    9. Re:Tau is greater than pi by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      To anyone who knows what they are doing, both pi and tau are simply constants. Absorb either into some constant term, or carry it around with you wherever you go---it doesn't matter. Real engineers, mathematicians, scientists, etc can handle either constant without difficulty. The real advantage that tau has over pi is pedagogical. It is much easier to communicate the relation between angle measure and arc length with tau. Since trig functions deal with lengths more readily than area, it makes sense to teach people trigonometry using a constant that is more closely related to length.

    10. Re:Tau is greater than pi by ath1901 · · Score: 1

      I would like to disagree. I don't know how many times I've lost a 2 somewhere in the calculation. Either because of brain malfunction like "right angle = pi/4", forgetting a 2 in 2*pi*r or even adding a 2 in pi*r^2/2 just because the integral of r = r^2/2. I think most engineers and mathematicians have made similar mistakes.

      Making sound choices to prevent stupid mistakes is important. Pi is an unnecessary evil.

      Also, we should switch to base 6. People make too many mistakes with 6,7,8 multiplication.

    11. Re:Tau is greater than pi by camperdave · · Score: 1
      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  6. thanks by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    that was easy.

  7. Divide a circle with radians... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... and you have a sliced pie.

    If the number had been discovered recently it would probably have been called pizz(a).

    1. Re: Divide a circle with radians... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm ... Pizza Pi !!!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re: Divide a circle with radians... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      And Pizza Pie is cut with a circular blade. Coincidence? I think not!

    3. Re: Divide a circle with radians... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      What kind of barbarian cuts their pizza with a circular blade? It's a meat cleaver from above the shoulder or nothing. How else are you expected to get the proper ratio of pizza to shattered pizza stone right?

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    4. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It was named pi, not pie. And the greek letter pi is pronounced like pea and not like pie.

    5. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not here in America. Every math teacher and professor I've encountered pronounced "pi" as "pie."

    6. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by arth1 · · Score: 0

      Americans also say "febuary" for February, "ant" for aunt, "eyekeea" for IKEA, "seltic" for Celtic, "yoke" for yolk, "expresso" for espresso, "clurk" for clerk, "zeebra" for zebra, and "sherbert" for sherbet. Never mind saying "octo-pie" for octopodes, to get back to Greek. And "zee" for Z, to get back to letters.

      I don't expect Americans to pronounce Ralph (rafe), forecastle (foxl), Menzies (mingus) and Featherstonhaugh (fanshaw) correctly, but Greek letters shouldn't be too hard. Xi, Pi, Phi, Chi and Psi all rhyme. If you don't say "chai" for chi, don't say "pie" for pi.

    7. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deeply ironic comment.

      "Seltic" was the universal pronunciation of celtic for ages. About a hundred years ago, some stupid snobs decided to change it to "keltic", based on a misguided idea about the root of the word. In spite of every other word in the language that starts with "ce" being pronounced with the "s" sound (or something else besides "k", such as "cello"). Unfortunately most Americans do in fact (mis)pronounce it "keltic" these days.

      If you're so interested in word histories, it should be "expresso", just like "express". Latin spells it with an "x". So do other Romance languages, such as French and Spanish. Again, virtually all Americans say and spell it "espresso", even though a huge historical mistake was made when this word entered English - we have the letter "x' (Italian doesn't, that's the reason for the Italian alteration), and the word should have changed back to "expresso" in our language. It is obvious at this point you have no idea how Americans generally talk, and are just making assumptions from afar.

      Octopodes is pedantic (according to online dictionaries) and very rarely used. It's "octopuses", which is the most common form is use around the world, including America.

      As for letters rhyming, you have to be kidding. "Zed" rhymes with no other latters. "Zee" rhymes with a bunch - B, C, D, E, G, P, T, V. If we're going to rhyme our pronunciations, start there!

      In any case, languages have accents and local pronunciations. Doesn't stop endless nitwits on the Internet insisting the way -I- pronounce things should be obediently copied by everyone else on the planet. What absolute b.s.

    8. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

      I'm a language pedant too, but I learnt many things from your post..

    9. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further follow-up. I just listened to the pronunciation of "pi" on the Cambridge and Oxford dictionary websites. In both British English and American English, it's pronounced "pie", not "pea".

    10. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Sense of humour failure or perhaps you just can't spot a joke?

      " And the greek letter pi is pronounced like pea"

      No, it isn't, not in English either american , british or australian.

    11. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't say "chai" for chi, don't say "pie" for pi

      Like most Americans with a technical education, I pronounce chi as "kai". It rhymes with pi, of course.
      Most Ralphs don't pronounce their own name the way you indicate.
      I've never heard "seltic" except for the basketball team.
      I've never heard anyone say "expresso" or "espresso". That's some kind of coffee drink, right?
      I've only heard "febuary" and "sherbert" from people making fun of the same stereotypes you're using. My sister the librarian likes to say "liberry" ironically, too.
      How do you sing the alphabet song with "zed"?
      And I'm really curious about your pronunciation of yolk. Do you say the L, or is just a difference in vowel quality?

    12. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 2

      To calculate the surface area (a) of a pizza with radius z:

      Pi * z * z = a

      This formula was discovered by Sir Cumference, one of the lesser-known knights of the Round Table.

    13. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      In Greek, you are correct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (Learn to Read and Write Greek - Greek Alphabet Made Easy - Greek Characters Pee and Seegma)

    14. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      "Seltic" was the universal pronunciation of celtic for ages. About a hundred years ago, some stupid snobs decided to change it to "keltic", based on a misguided idea about the root of the word.

      Misguided? The word comes from Greek Keltoi, the same word that is the root for Gaul.

      when this word entered English - we have the letter "x' (Italian doesn't, that's the reason for the Italian alteration)

      Italian doesn't have the letter X? So what's the Italian letter that's pronounced ics and is found in words like xilofono?

      Doesn't stop endless nitwits on the Internet [...]

      It takes one to know one?

    15. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      And I'm really curious about your pronunciation of yolk. Do you say the L, or is just a difference in vowel quality?

      Yes, I believe most non-Americans pronounce the l. The word is strongly related to "yellow", and the earlier spelling was yelk.

    16. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by skegg · · Score: 1

      It appears pronunciation must be your "neech" ;-)

    17. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      English Dictionaries record common speech and writing; they do not tell what is right or wrong.

    18. Re: Divide a circle with radians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just admit you're wrong.

    19. Re:Divide a circle with radians... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      At least they pronounce "Lieutennant" correctly.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  8. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I thought Newton only calculated up to 3.14159265358979 (15 digits)

  9. With today's low information and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now would be the perfect time to re-introduce this failed pi legislation

  10. Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pi Is Exactly 3!!

    1. Re:Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sayeth the Lord. Any man should doubt this, shall surely be put to death; the people of the land shall stone him.

    2. Re:Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, that's an oldie. Let me leave this here for you.

      AC because I don't have karma to burn. Also I won't upvote own anonymous comment (I wouldn't be anonymous, then, would I?).

  11. pi for perimeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or perimetros, in greek. That's all

  12. Three and a little something more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always thought it was an appropriate symbol, because the greek symbol for "pi" is constructed with 2 straight lines, and a third slightly curved line.

    Each segment is "1" in length, except the curved segment, which is 1.14159265358979...

    I understand that there are different "font" variations on writing the letter pi, but I always found this to be generally neat.

  13. It's Pee not Pie by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    Why use a foreign letter and use a false pronunciation? Î or Ï are pronounced as the english P or p. Also Î or Ï are not pronounce as you think. You may see it as ÎαÏ... in the greek alphabet, but αÏ... is either pronounced as af or av, so ÏαÏ... is pronounce the same as tough(as in stronk).

    1. Re: It's Pee not Pie by Tsolias · · Score: 1

      Ooohhh... Great, it seems thst the encouding is broken. Last time I checked it was 2017

    2. Re: It's Pee not Pie by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ooohhh... Great, it seems thst the encouding is broken. Last time I checked it was 2017

      The /. commit log is from 2003, though. :/

      The owner before the owner before the owner was going to sync up with that other site that tried to fork /. and fixed up the code but didn't manage to attract the user base. I'm not being coy, I've legitimately forgotten its odd name - somebody please add it here.

      Instead we have half-page ads that make it impossible to interact with the content - one wonders if the editors are all running UBlock Origin and haven't noticed.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re: It's Pee not Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope is not a strategy. Use the "Preview" button.

      As for your main point, it would be stupid if pi were pronounced as the English p. "Athens" isn't pronounced as the Greek would pronounce it either. There's a lot of leeway for these things.

    4. Re: It's Pee not Pie by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Soylentnews.org Interesting what they've done with their fork of the code.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  14. No one has said this yet... by Snard · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... but yes, it's "that" John Conway.

    --
    - Mike
    1. Re:No one has said this yet... by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was going to mention that, but honestly, he's not thrilled with that being what he's best known for. "I used to say, and I'm still inclined to say occasionally, that I hate it. I hate the Game of Life."

    2. Re:No one has said this yet... by Snard · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry he doesn't like being identified with the Game of Life, but it has a special place in my personal software development history. It was one of the first computer programs I wrote in 1971 after graduating from high school, after reading the original articles about it in Scientific American.

      --
      - Mike
    3. Re:No one has said this yet... by janeil · · Score: 1

      Those were the days. I'm guessing it was a Martin Gardner Recreational Mathematics article as well.

  15. Unicode? by djbckr · · Score: 2

    Lesse... Pi is a unicode character that most computers can display.

    It should appear here >>

    Nope... Come on...

    1. Re:Unicode? by Mybrid · · Score: 1

      Well met! Proof positive we think we are a lot smarter than we practice.

  16. pi != 3.14... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or, at the very least, 3.14 is a terrible approximation of pi, which is far closer to 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286 208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481 117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964428810975665933446128475648233 786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273724587006 606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146 951941511609433057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548074462379962749 567351885752724891227938183011949129833673362440656643086021394946395224737190 702179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132000568127145263560827 785771342757789609173637178721468440901224953430146549585371050792279689258923 542019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960518707211349999998372978049 951059731732816096318595024459455346908302642522308253344685035261931188171010 003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303598253490428755468731159562863882 353787593751957781857780532171226806613001927876611195909216420198938095257201 065485863278865936153381827968230301952035301852968995773622599413891249721775 283479131515574857242454150695950829533116861727855889075098381754637464939319 255060400927701671139009848824012858361603563707660104710181942955596198946767 837449448255379774726847104047534646208046684259069491293313677028989152104752 162056966024058038150193511253382430035587640247496473263914199272604269922796 782354781636009341721641219924586315030286182974555706749838505494588586926995 690927210797509302955321165344987202755960236480665499119881834797753566369807 426542527862551818417574672890977772793800081647060016145249192173217214772350 141441973568548161361157352552133475741849468438523323907394143334547762416862 518983569485562099219222184272550254256887671790494601653466804988627232791786 085784383827967976681454100953883786360950680064225125205117392984896084128488 626945604241965285022210661186306744278622039194945047123713786960956364371917 287467764657573962413890865832645995813390478027590099465764078951269468398352 595709825822620522489407726719478268482601476990902640136394437455305068203496 252451749399651431429809190659250937221696461515709858387410597885959772975498 930161753928468138268683868942774155991855925245953959431049972524680845987273 644695848653836736222626099124608051243884390451244136549762780797715691435997 700129616089441694868555848406353422072225828488648158456028506016842739452267 467678895252138522549954666727823986456596116354886230577456498035593634568174 324112515076069479451096596094025228879710893145669136867228748940560101503308 617928680920874760917824938589009714909675985261365549781893129784821682998948 722658804857564014270477555132379641451523746234364542858444795265867821051141 354735739523113427166102135969536231442952484937187110145765403590279934403742 007310578539062198387447808478489683321445713868751943506430218453191048481005 370614680674919278191197939952061419663428754440643745123718192179998391015919 561814675142691239748940907186494231961567945208095146550225231603881930142093 762137855956638937787083039069792077346722182562599661501421503068038447734549 202605414665925201497442850732518666002132434088190710486331734649651453905796 268561005508106658796998163574736384052571459102897064140110971206280439039759 515677157700420337869936007230558763176359421873125147120532928191826186125867 321579198414848829164470609575270695722091756711672291098169091528017350671274 858322287183520935396572512108357915136988209144421006751033467110314126711136 990865851639831501970165151168517143765761835155650884909989859982387345528331 635507647918535893226185489632132933089857064204675259070915481416549859461637 180270981994309924488957571282890592323326097299712084433573265489382391193259 746366730583604142813883032038249037589852437441702913276561809377344403070746 921120191302033038019762110110044929321516084244485963766983895228684783123552 6582131449576857262433441893039686426243410773226978028073

    1. Re:pi != 3.14... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving that many digits (especially when I know you didn't approximate that yourself) is at best false precision, yes your number is closer to pi, but not in any useful or meaningful way. No one benefits from scrolling through your still inexact number.

      Good enough for JPL, is more than good enough for me.

      https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/2016/3/16/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do-we-really-need/

    2. Re: pi != 3.14... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your last digit is off. Please post again, and I will critique that post! (Again)

    3. Re:pi != 3.14... by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      Could this possibly be correct? I found a double zero in the middle of it.

    4. Re:pi != 3.14... by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I missed a triple zero near the end.

    5. Re:pi != 3.14... by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

      Irrational post warning.

      I look forward to further instalments, as this is so far woefully incomplete.

  17. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Nope, your number isn't even substantially more accurate - what's the difference between three significant digits and 25 in the face of infinity? Nearly nothing, except for the fact that it's a rare calculation that gets any real-world benefit from more than three significant digits. (well, outside of banking I suppose...)

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  18. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> what's the difference between three significant digits and 25

    Said no computer science major, ever. (Look up the effect of iteration on small differences, then study up on damping, etc.)

  19. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    nonsense, need a few more digits in machining, optics, space exploration, etc.

  20. Re: It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    22/7

  21. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    what's the difference between three significant digits and 25

    Ummm...one is for blacksmiths and one is for astronauts?

  22. Also amusing: Why we solve for "X" by doug141 · · Score: 1

    The Arabic scholars solved for "unknown thing, " which was translated by Spaniards into Greek as "X." Or maybe Descartes popularized it. http://gizmodo.com/why-we-use-...

  23. "Came up" with pi? by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    Jones came up with the Greek letter and symbol for the figure in 1706...

    Umm, the Greek letter is the "symbol." The summary (or actually the Times article that the summary, as usual, plagiarizes, though this time they at least made an awkward attempt at attribution) makes it sound like the Greeks had this letter "pi" but no "symbol" to actually use to write it, which is as absurd as claiming, for example, that Gosset (aka Student) came up with the English letter and symbol "tee"/t to represent the result of his test of statistical significance.

    In other news, this article can be much more succinctly summarized as follows: Greeks did not use the letter "pi" to represent this value; William Jones, obviously much later, was apparently the first to do so, and this usage was later popularized by Euler. The selection of this particular letter is likely due to it being the first letter in the Greek morpheme "peri-", 'around' (a bit more general than the article suggests as it seems to be overly simplified compared to other sources on the subject).

    --
    R.Mo
    1. Re:"Came up" with pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Greek letter is the glyph. The symbol is the meaning attached to the glyph in a mathematical context.

      So it's entirely accurate to say that Jones came up with the symbol. And it's also accurate to say that he came up with using the Greek letter to represent that symbol. And the phrase "the Greek letter" already attributes the glyph to the Greeks.

      You need to fix your compiler. It has syntax comprehension errors.

    2. Re: "Came up" with pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are speaking mathematics, not your programming language compiler jargon.

      In mathematics, there is no "glyph", bonehead. That would be called a symbol. What you are calling a symbol would be a number.

    3. Re: "Came up" with pi? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Pi is a Greek *letter*. Thus, it's representation in typography can be called a "glyph". Are you saying that numbers and mathematical symbols are no longer glyphs when used in a mathematical context?

      --
      FC Closer
  24. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the difference between three significant digits and 25

    22 of them. Duh.

  25. Catherine the Great's Mathematician? by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do we really need to invoke Catherine the Great's name to help explain who Leonhard "one-of-the-greatest-mathematician's-of-all-time" Euler was? For me it would be more like "Catherine the Great, a sponsor of the legendary Euler, also happened to do some notable things while leading Russia".

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
    1. Re:Catherine the Great's Mathematician? by cpotoso · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    2. Re:Catherine the Great's Mathematician? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      My grad school had an intramural football team called Euler's Oilers...

    3. Re:Catherine the Great's Mathematician? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was Russian. Probably worth mentioning, as another evidence that the Russians have conspired to hack Hillary's election.

  26. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the difference between three significant digits and 25 in the face of infinity?

    The ability to do interplanetary navigation?

  27. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the difference between three significant digits and 25

    An enormous amount of computation. I don't know what method Newton used, but the Taylor series, for 16 decimal places that, with some quick and dodgy napkin math, is somewhere around the order of about 10^15 terms.

  28. MAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bite: what's the MAA?

    1. Re:MAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, RTFA.

  29. The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    The pi symbol could easily be replaced with something that depicts the representation between radius and circumference, freeing up a tiny bit of learned memory for everyone who uses math. There is no reason to use a purely symbolic constant to represent a naturally occurring relationship. Save the ancient Greek symbols for meaningless artifacts which only occur in math space.

    I understand that many people who would write that this is not necessary, would also write that they would not want to have to relearn the new symbol, thereby proving a point that it took too much effort to lean the old one.

    Oddly a pie as in pie symbol makes more sense to more people.

    There is a reason why so many people forget so much of their math.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      The pi symbol could easily be replaced with something that depicts the representation between radius and circumference, freeing up a tiny bit of learned memory for everyone who uses math. There is no reason to use a purely symbolic constant to represent a naturally occurring relationship. Save the ancient Greek symbols for meaningless artifacts which only occur in math space. I understand that many people who would write that this is not necessary, would also write that they would not want to have to relearn the new symbol, thereby proving a point that it took too much effort to lean the old one.

      Lots of things potentially replaced by icons, I suppose. But doesn't your argument apply equally well to the western 26-letter alphabet itself?

      Why go through so much effort of learning those silly "letter" thingies, when we could be using emoticons or classic Chinese picture inspired words or hieroglyphics and "save ourselves so much trouble"?

    2. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      There is no reason to use a purely symbolic constant to represent a naturally occurring relationship.

      How can you ever represent it except in a symbolic way? That's what symbols do. That's what "representation" is.

      A circle with a line across it? That's still a symbol, and you still need to learn what it means.

      would also write that they would not want to have to relearn the new symbol, thereby proving a point that it took too much effort to lean the old one.

      No, it means it took almost no effort to learn the old one, and it's not like anyone ever really forgets it if they need it, so what's the point in changing it now?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      There is a reason why so many people forget so much of their math.

      Yes, as the talking barbie said: "Math is hard!

    4. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by slew · · Score: 1

      Why go through so much effort of learning those silly "letter" thingies, when we could be using emoticons or classic Chinese picture inspired words or hieroglyphics and "save ourselves so much trouble"?

      I suspect that given the way emoticons are taking over chat and the fact that the Chinese are taking over the economy, we may be heading in that direction...

    5. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

      The pi symbol could easily be replaced with something that depicts the representation between radius and circumference

      Can I vote for the new symbol to be Pac-Man?

    6. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      PacMan might be a good choice, as it indicates radii and circumferences, and also looks like a pie with a wedge cut out. A pain to draw, though.

      As an aside, as a college student, I enjoyed learning new uses for most of the Greek letters, and liked to keep track of which ones didn't have an assigned special meaning yet.

    7. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The pi symbol could easily be replaced with something that depicts the representation between radius and circumference,

      Which would not be representational for all the other mathematical uses of pi, a number that shows up a lot in places you might not expect, such as the normal distribution.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:The Pi Symbol is Nonsense by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The pi symbol could easily be replaced with something that depicts the representation between radius and circumference...

      I agree. Tau: the ratio of the circumference to the radius.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  30. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Immerman · · Score: 1

    you forgot "in the face of infinity" in your quote.

    22/infinity ~= 0%

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  32. Pee and pie by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2

    Some years ago I had a university professor who was of Greek extraction, and he pronounced the names of the English and Greek letters the same, "pee". The coursework (communications) involved lots of probability distributions, so both came up frequently. You had to pay attention.

    ...laura

  33. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    There are methods way faster than a Taylor series. Ramanujan's series adds 8 digits per iteration, so getting to 16 would take two steps rather than 10^15 (a significant reduction). Chudnovsky's method converges even faster.

  34. it's 3 PERIOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in indiana, home state of ayatollah pence, as the bible teaches!

  35. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by mopower70 · · Score: 0

    >> what's the difference between three significant digits and 25 Said no computer science major, ever. (Look up the effect of iteration on small differences, then study up on damping, etc.)

    Except, you know... that's not what he said. What he said is

    what's the difference between three significant digits and 25 in the face of infinity

    which taken in the context of mathematics is an accurate observation. The difference in accuracy between three significant digits and twenty-five significant digits as the requirement for perfect accuracy approaches infinity, is zero. (Look up "Calculus 101", then study up on limits at infinity, etc.)

  36. It Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always have a lot of coffee with my pie, which makes me pee.

  37. PI is not the number 3.14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What more do I need to say?

    PI is not the number 3.14

    This has been known for a very long time.

  38. Conway as in Conway's Life, that is by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    John Conway, mathematics professor emeritus at Princeton University who once won the school's Pi Day pie-eating contest.

    He also invented Life, of course.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  39. Euler was such a hack by russotto · · Score: 1

    Takes something of Archimedes, and makes it his own by giving it a name he gives a faux-Ancient-Greek patina. He stole the other most famous transcendental constant, Oughtred's (or possibly Napier's) 'e', and named it after himself too.

  40. Pi or some Egyptian letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it weird that the Egyptians were the ones who used the number Pi literally but it is named with a greek letter?

    We Westerners love naming things...

  41. Euler was the man for all symbols! by janeil · · Score: 2
    Euler was the boss, and pretty much invented and standardized the way we write algebra symbols. As Dr. Julius Sumner Miller used to say, he is deserving of your further study!

    Also, 3.14 is so undeserving to connect with pi, it might as well just be three. What is still amazing is 355/113, the most accurate fraction for pi with a denominator less than 10,000 or so. (I could be off a little, look it up.)

  42. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by lutusp · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, but just for fun I would like to to live in a country where people know that pi = 4 * integral(sqrt(1-x^2),x,0,1)) --https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4+integral(+sqrt(1-x%5E2),x,0,1) -- http://i.imgur.com/VyUvzQK.png

  43. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing pragmatic is done in the face of conceptual infinity.

    So relatively speaking yes, but in absolute terms for a given calculation it is not relevant.

  44. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are methods way faster than a Taylor series. Ramanujan's series adds 8 digits per iteration, so getting to 16 would take two steps rather than 10^15 (a significant reduction). Chudnovsky's method converges even faster.

    I know the Taylor series is highly inefficient, I was merely pointing out that it was one of the early methods and was highly computationally expensive. No matter how much free time Newton had on his hands, it wasn't going to be that much. And thanks for the link, very interesting.

  45. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same AC here, I don't actually understand all of the notation in the link you gave as it is displaying here, I'll have to look it up. But each iteration of that looks like quite a bit of calculation too.

  46. Joke is decades older than Hedberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My elderly pops used to tell me this joke when Mitch was in diapers.

  47. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Same AC here, I don't actually understand all of the notation in the link you gave as it is displaying here, I'll have to look it up.

    The Unicode on that page is borked. There is a really good discussion on this Stackoverflow page including Chudonovsky's method.

    But each iteration of that looks like quite a bit of calculation too.

    You could do a few iterations of Chudnovsky in a week. A quadrillion iterations of Taylor's series would take a thousand lifetimes.

  48. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    That would be the difference between a clock that keeps reasonable time, and one that loses over 40 seconds a day.

  49. Beware the image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beware! I just discovered the pi string posted is a uuencoded image of goatse !!!

  50. 3.14 isn't Pi by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to the diameter. 3.14 is an approximation of Pi to three significant figures. A closer approximation is 3.14159265359
    Pi is an "irrational number" which never has a final concrete value. You just get as close as you need to for the accuracy of what you are trying to do. I remember using Pi out to 13 decimal places in undergraduate physics class. ... Picking on the sloppy wording in the article.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  51. Re:It's not 3.14. It's 3.141592653589793238462643. by camperdave · · Score: 1

    So Newton wasn't smart enough to figure out that the true circle constant is Tau, not Pi?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!