Slashdot Mirror


Questions Linger After ISP Blocks TeamViewer Over Fraud Fears (sophos.com)

Last Wednesday, for no apparent reason, the TeamViewer remote desktop application stopped working on the network of one of the UK's largest ISPs, TalkTalk. The apparent reason, as the investigation has found, are some scammers in India who have been abusing the application to make money. An anonymous reader shares a report: It's a popular application with remote support professionals and power users alike and so support forums soon filled with complaints from perplexed users who noticed that access was possible with 4G and some TalkTalk business connections but not home broadband. By Thursday, journalists dragged the truth out of the company that it had "blocked a number of applications including TeamViewer," which led to a joint statement confirming this on TeamViewer's website: TeamViewer and TalkTalk are in extensive talks to find a comprehensive joint solution to better address this scamming issue. We now know (as some suspected at the time) that the block was connected to abuse of TeamViewer by criminals based in India who had been using it as part of a tech support scam targeting TalkTalk customers. The BBC reported on this two days before the block, including the disturbing claim that the criminals had been able to quote stolen customer account data to make scam calls sound more convincing.

87 comments

  1. partial solution by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    blacklist teamviewer connections from india?

    Yes they can still use proxies, but anything to make their life more difficult... Like this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    1. Re:partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Sonciwall's Geo-filter feature to block connections from Europe and Teamviewer is blocked unless I allow Germany....

    2. Re: partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The ISP blocking connections is a good thing in this case. If TeamViewer is not going to deal with the scamming problem, take it to the next level and sever the connection. Force TeamViewer to come up with a solution.

    3. Re: partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot much? How is this TeamViewer's problem? TV is just a tool.

    4. Re: partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I bet those scamming bastards are using an OS too; better block that while we're at it. Genius.

    5. Re:partial solution by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      blacklist teamviewer connections from india?

      That would totally work -- except so many companies are outsourcing their legitimate support to India as well.

    6. Re: partial solution by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If TeamViewer is not going to deal with the scamming problem, take it to the next level and sever the connection.

      faceplam.

      The only reason they are using Teamviewer is that it works pretty good. The scammers could switch tomorrow to another remote support tool. Or a VNC based tool with a preconfigured reverse connection; hosted from anywhere, connecting to anywhere... they could even keep calling it teamviewer... they're scammers so honesty isn't a pre-req.

      Teamviewer is not a 'hacking tool' and it is not a 'scamming tool' any more than a 'telephone' is a scamming tool. Or the TalkTalk ISP itself is. Blocking teamviewer because people are using it as part of the scam would be almost as idiotic as blocking these customers from reaching their banks. "Well if their bank isn't going to deal with the scamming problem, we'll just stop letting people connect to their banks online.. "

      Better still TalkTalk should cut off the customers TalkTalk internet access -- that's where the real problem is anyway. Since TalkTalk apparently lost a bunch of customer data / records allowing the scammers to sound a lot more convincingly like they are calling from talktalk. Whoops.

      I'm curious what you think Teamviewer should do about the problem. Or Microsoft. Or apple (because they aren't immune from a scam like this...) or even your grandma you stuck on linux mint or is the fact that your grandma can get scammed by someone pretending to work for TalkTalk while running linux mint somehow Torvalds fault?

      Teamviewer (and VNC) run on all three platforms, and as long as the scammer doesn't say he's calling from "Windows" but instead is calling from their (Actual) ISP TalkTalk...

    7. Re:partial solution by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      blacklist teamviewer connections from india?

      That would totally work -- except so many companies are outsourcing their legitimate support to India as well.

      Not seeing a problem here,TBH.

    8. Re: partial solution by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      yeah, and a lot of those fraudsters have already switched to other RA clients, just worked on a machine hit w/ one this weekend. (ughh, but hey, at least it wasn't ransomeware...)

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    9. Re:partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be so much better to block India completely. The noise to ratio on technical forums would certainly be lower.

    10. Re:partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      blacklist teamviewer connections from india?

      blacklist India, period.

      Back when I looked after a fairly large network, and after a month of fruitlessly sending f.tons of emails to abuse@addresses, I basically decided one morning, fsck it, blocked all known Indian net ranges (and Chinese, Pakistani and Indonesian ones as well into the bargain), then worked on letting individual IP numbers through on a case-by-base basis. It was amazing how very few (7, ISTR) were finally allowed.

      I'm out of the IT game as a profession nowadays, but guess which country's net ranges had just recently been added to my home firewall's shitlist thanks to incessant VNC probings and attempts to relay BS through my mail server?

      (If anyone's interested, I started with files from here as a a basis for my lists.)

  2. Lessons to learn by dontbemad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much flak as American ISPs get for their noncompetitive and morally bereft behavior, we do need to be reminded that things could generally be much worse. There is nothing wrong with pressuring large businesses (especially those with government-sanctioned monopolies) to change their shameful ways, but I do occasionally breathe a sigh of relief that, at least for the moment, our biggest concerns (outside of government spying) are speed, price, and general availability of service.

    It seems almost commonplace for websites or services to get blocked at an ISP level in the UK, and that fact alone seems more frightening than any increase in price that Comcast could throw at me.

    1. Re: Lessons to learn by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really easy to change ISP in the U.K. You're not trapped like you are in the US.

    2. Re: Lessons to learn by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      That would be fine if the U.K. government didnt often talk about mandating that all ISP's do censorship.

      Its got its own wikipedia article

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Lessons to learn by jonwil · · Score: 2

      With Net Neutrality gone under Trump there is nothing to stop US ISPs from unilaterally blocking whatever they dont like (remember when Comcast got busted for their attempts to mess with BitTorrent traffic?)

    4. Re: Lessons to learn by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Talk yes. They do a lot of that but they're a bit busy right now with another minor issue so if you want an ISP that doesn't block your access to TeamViewer you have a choice of dozens. TalkTalk are a terrible ISP in any case and anyone who is using TeamViewer for anything should have more sense than to go anywhere near them.

    5. Re: Lessons to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you trapped in the US? I pay a monthly fee end of story. I want to switch, I call them say good bye and sign up for someone new.

    6. Re: Lessons to learn by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      No idea. The impression I get here is that there are only two ISPs to choose from in many areas, hence the many complaints. If that's not the case then ignore my comment.

    7. Re:Lessons to learn by Khyber · · Score: 1

      There is plenty. Example, I pay to utilize a program. If my ISP blocks access to that program, they're performing tortious interference of contract between me and the other company, and I can sue the hell out of them for it.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re: Lessons to learn by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most of the country has access to more than two ISP's. Cable and DSL alone are almost everywhere population density isnt absurdly low. Cellular and satellite has even more availability, but is of course more expensive and/or has too much latency for things like multi-player gaming.

      What happens is that in some very high population density areas the local governments have given Cable and DSL operators such strong unchallengeable monopolies that they never upgrade their services. Essentially those areas are stuck with bandwidths that were only average as much as a two decade ago. 1mbit DSL's and 3mbit DOCSIS's.

      The complaints you see here are from people that dont even know which local government seat is responsible for granting the monopolies. They will cry for some national solution to their local problem instead taking even a moment to figure out which local politician needs to be voted out. A week or so ago I took a few such moments to post who the local politicians were in Seattle, a city that is almost 3000 miles away from me. It seems I care more than the complainers.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re: Lessons to learn by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      In the US it really depends on the area.

      My home town has one service provider, the city I live in now has two.

    10. Re: Lessons to learn by dontbemad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You aren't wrong, but it can be a little more complicated than that. You ability to get different service is largely dependent on where you live. Since the country is so big, different corners and different population centers can have wildly varying experiences with ISPs.

      For instance, I live in the center of Atlanta, GA. We don't have the best selection down here (although, my apartment community is scheduled to get Google Fiber in the next couple months, so...), but there certainly is a "selection". It may be 2-3 choices, and none of them may be great, but there are signs that people are waking up to the need for more pressure on their local legislators to overturn laws and rules that forbid competition.

      This is a slight tangent, but a huge amount of the "need" for NetNeutrality wouldn't exist if ISPs could actually be competed with. Startups and municipalities are, more often than not, hamstrung out of the gate by state legislature that all but outright forbids competition against large Telcos from a smaller, more local source. Instead of adding more laws to the books, I am more in favor of getting those anti-compete laws out of here, and allowing for enterprising city councilmen and business owners to create solutions that fit the needs of their communities.

      Anyway, bringing this back on point: Yes, we do generally have a harder time "switching", as it were, but it isn't quite as bleak as some foreigners make it out to be sometimes.

    11. Re: Lessons to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, that's a really, really, really stupid idea? That's how you end up with cable-tv. If you let the various providers block whatever they want at their discretion, you'll inevitably find yourself in the situation where you can't use ISP #1 because they block X, and you can't use ISP #2 because they block Y, and ISP #3 because they are blocking Z, so you either can't do what you want, or have to have three god damned subscriptions.

      This whole "if they are not providing what you want, switch" bullshit has to die. It just doesn't work, unless you love the cable-tv model.

    12. Re: Lessons to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me just leave this here for you. Keep in mind, the FCC standard for broadband is 25/3. Tell us more about choice.

      https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/us-broadband-still-no-isp-choice-for-many-especially-at-higher-speeds/

    13. Re: Lessons to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for proving his point. Instead of figuring out which local politicians are to blame in your area, and getting off your ass and voting, you post an irrelevant link to an FCC definition.

    14. Re: Lessons to learn by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      They will cry for some national solution to their local problem instead taking even a moment to figure out which local politician needs to be voted out.

      You are looking at this the wrong way. No point voting someone out only to get another politician voting the same way. You need to work out who to vote in, not out. Then, of course, that individual has to do what they said they would when the were trying to get elected, be influential enough to sway the vote on a bill to change the status quo, and not hold unacceptable positions on other issues. I venture this might be a hard problem to solve with certainty.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    15. Re:Lessons to learn by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      At which point the ISP brings up the contract you signed which says they can block any packets they feel like blocking, and you lose your lawsuit.

    16. Re:Lessons to learn by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Uh, yea, unless you've been paying attention, most ISPs are not offering contract-based plans. Charter/Spectrum? Hah, they don't carry enough paperwork to hide the legalese. In fact they're advertising over the radios right now "No contract." So, yea, your whole idea's pretty fucked.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:Lessons to learn by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Uh, yea, unless you've been paying attention, most ISPs are not offering contract-based plans.

      You confuse a ___-year commitment contract with contract in general.

      I guarantee you signed a contract with your ISP, even if it does not include a length of service commitment on your part. In that contract, you agreed to pay them $X for internet service. If there was no contract, they could not send you a bill.

      In that contract is a clause saying they get to block whatever they feel like blocking.

    18. Re: Lessons to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't have this issue with choice since I live primarily in a civilized part of the world without this problem. The "irrelevant link" merely points out that most of the country does NOT, in fact, have choice.

    19. Re:Lessons to learn by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The ONLY paperwork I signed was specifically for the modem and service and billing. Nothing on that paperwork included any legalese. Not a single bit of fine print. I still hold the copy of the service receipt.

      So if they block or throttle, it's their ass in court. Nothing of that sort is listed as a term and condition on any piece of paper I signed.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  3. Block everything by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Funny

    The internet is always used by internet scammers. If you completely block the internet, it will eliminate all those scams!

    1. Re:Block everything by starblazer · · Score: 1

      So easy to use, no wonder why it's #1.

  4. Sounds great...but misguided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My neighbor keeps being taken advantage of by scammers in India and Eastern Europe. TeamViewer seems to be the tool of choice. I finally talked her into putting Linux on there (she doesn't really know what that means) and blackholed all DNS requests for every website I could find that is even remotely related to remote access. Many won't work on Linux but I'd rather not find out. Firefox is set to block add-ons. Life is much better now and she has no problem with her shiny new Linux system.

    I wish there was something we could do to better protect the elderly. Blocking TeamViewer may be a great idea for the elderly who fall victim to scams several times a day, but they're a little misguided to do so for everyone.

    1. Re:Sounds great...but misguided by ruir · · Score: 1

      Extra points for not telling her it is Linux and putting a skin, hell, probably you do not need that, put a background image saying "Windows 10".
      It would be pretty interesting hearing the conversations that she has with potential scammers, and them guiding her to install executables and going through the system menus.

  5. block facebook? by Causemos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Facebook is probably used for more fraud than TeamViewer.

  6. Re: Preventing stupidity by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    you're and idiot

    The words of an expert in the field.

  7. Re: Help? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Ooh you're gonna get eaten alive Mr Troll

  8. Needs to happen more often... by moosehooey · · Score: 0

    These scams are extensive, and TeamViewer and other remote-access programs know about it but don't do anything. Blocking them is the only way to get them to sit the fuck up and listen and do something about it.

    Just search on YouTube for tech support scams, and you can see hundreds or thousands of videos of these scammers in operation.

    1. Re:Needs to happen more often... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing can be done besides educating people. If YOU allow a remote connection, that is YOUR fault not the developer's fault.

    2. Re:Needs to happen more often... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      It's almost always the free version also, I'm sure if the only version available was a paid version or limited in the number of clients it could connect to it would reduce the number of scamers using team viewer.

       

  9. Re:Help? by PPH · · Score: 1

    I think you can run it in Wine.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re: Preventing stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to your grandmotherâ. They are the people getting scammed. She has no idea what VPN means.

  11. the answer is: "a VM!" (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a VMware VM running Ubuntu with the Linux version of TeamViewer. When I do have to connect to someone, TeamViewer is running in a fairly safe sandbox.

  12. The real reason by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...because they're too lazy to investigate and block the phone numbers that the scammers are using.

  13. I just had one of these calls today by yorgasor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I answered in a very simple-minded voice, and told "Paul," after he explained that they're tracking all sorts of malicious traffic coming from my computer that I liked it that way. When he tried to confirm that statement, I told him I liked to share. By that point I was far enough off of his script that he gave up and hung up the phone.

    I think next time I'm going to sound all cagey and worried that people were finding out about the kinds of malicious scripts I've been writing.

    --
    Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    1. Re:I just had one of these calls today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just do what I do, give them a VM but firewall everything but the remote assistance software. It can get pretty funny because the thing will constantly complain about not being connected to the internet, yet obviously is. I've even had them say I needed to connect it to the Internet and then respond with confusion when I point out that they are currently connected and controlling it. "How does that work if it wasn't connected?"

    2. Re: I just had one of these calls today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had a call like this a few months ago (at my friend's - he's on TalkTalk btw). I asked him to pass me the phone and went along with the script but didn't say the PC was on, "sorry this old computer takes so long to boot up [sat reading for a few minutes]", didn't let on it was Linux, "I can't see any Start button", and was generally so clueless that she passed me on to a supervisor. I misled and wound him up for while before admitting it was Linux. He got angry and passed me back to the woman who also got angry. I laughed. It was quite a fun 15 minutes.

    3. Re:I just had one of these calls today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I throw them into a spare VM full of viruses and furry porn. They don't know what hit 'em.

    4. Re:I just had one of these calls today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, get them to set the syskey on their own computer and password protect the BIOS, and don't give the passwords to them.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du6acZ-PZQ8

  14. You need to get a clue. by thesupraman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FFS you moron.

    'These scams are extensive, they all use phone calls, both cellular and land line, Blocking peoples access to the phone system is the only way to get the phone companies to sit the fuck up and listen and do something about it'

    'These scams are extensive, they all target Windows users, Making the home use of Windows illegal is the only way to get Microsoft to sit the fuck up and listen and do something about it'

    Probably over your head, but getting the idea?

    Teamviewer is NOT the problem here - the problem appears to be that the ISP has had account data stolen, that is then being used to scam their members - and they are reacting by blaming one of the tools being used, almost certainly to cloud their own responsibility.

    Yes, these scams are common and ugly. The ISP however could EASILY be blocking IP ranges of teamviewer, not just all access - ESPECIALLY as in this case it appears the scammers have data the ISP has lost.....

    1. Re:You need to get a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ESPECIALLY as in this case it appears the scammers have data the ISP has lost....

      The fucked up part is the company probably sold it to the scammers.

    2. Re:You need to get a clue. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point. Here is where we diverge:

      'These scams are extensive, they all target Windows users, Making the home use of Windows illegal is the only way to get Microsoft to sit the fuck up and listen and do something about it'

      You used that as an example of a bad idea, but I kind of like it. ;)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  15. Re: Limited choice by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Your choices are generally mre limited when you rent though to whatever company owns the cable lines and whatever company owns the telephone lines, the latter of which has relatively low bandwidth DSL. Wireless is beginning to compete, though. I live with my mom, not in some basement, and we lived with my uncle for awhile and a company stringing fiber arrived to compete with the regular cable company. We rent near my sister now and our choices are the aforementioned two.

  16. Itll work for a few days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then the scammers will all switch to gotomypc

  17. Allowing a 3rd party access to your LAN == Stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allowing a 3rd party access to your LAN == Stupid. Especially if you don't have a contract (i.e. free use version).

    If you don't have the technical expertise to setup a proper VPN and run your own remote desktop, then you have no business using a remote desktop/access system.

    I'm amazed at the level of incompetence shown daily.

  18. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably the same guys claiming to be from Microsoft. If you hear a Indian accent, just tell them to eat shit and hang up.

    1. Re: Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These Indians are shitskin garbage.

    2. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to hear them..."Is it lunch time already?"

  19. Criminals hacked master key? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

    This is time number#2 that folks reported random logins into PCs running TeamViewer. Reddit has more details as not phone scammers but another round 2 of PCs getting logged into with malware being loaded and logged off!

    A flame war with asshats system administrators denying it because there is no proof in a company statement. But to me evidence says otherwise if reports keep coming back. I have stopped using it and recommend others to stay away. Crappy and odd it's only TeamViewer that has that issue

    1. Re:Criminals hacked master key? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      It's not only teamviewer. They used to use logmein too, until they stopped free accounts. There's another tool that starts w/ an S (splashtop?) idk but my mother in law just got hit w/ that one... Payed 250 to hand over the keys to her machine and then turn off her AV and firewalls have them download the free version of Norton from Comcast which interestingly didn't detect their malware, and installed malware to keep it from being turned on for anything but on demand scans. Luckily MWB found it. I'm in the process of gathering her data off that drive pre-nuke later today.

      Classic "We're from Microsoft" scam, certainly not the tools fault! Could be done just as easily with any other client. Personally, I find Teamviewer to be an awesome workaround for me.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    2. Re:Criminals hacked master key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem a little confused. The GP wasn't talking about phone scammers using TeamViewer, but computers running TeamViewer being hacked.

  20. Re:Help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no i'm pretty sure hes going to have to install virtualbox to run windows to run cygwin to run his unix utilitys.

  21. i get it but by luther349 · · Score: 1

    yes scammers like team viewer but they also use other vnc apps like cracked versions of go to assets and so on. but you can go blaming the app for its misuse. its like blocking edge because scammers make fake pop ups.

  22. A joke too soon by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  23. Just shut down the internet already by fostandy · · Score: 0

    It's used by criminal elements

  24. Not all equal by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Not all equal - teamviewer has quite a few security holes in areas where VNC doesn't even have any access at all (eg. filesystem access). Google "teamviewer security vulnerability" for a bit of a rundown as to why it is a very poor choice in a market full of many other options.
    Blocking teamviewer as a policy at a business that is a user of a carriers service is a very good idea since it's not just the scammers you have to worry about. A carrier doing the blocking is not such a good idea since many of their clients may have a need for it.

    1. Re:Not all equal by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      TeamViewer works well. If it's not running, then no security holes. Anyone who leaves it on all the time needs to learn to be more paranoid. It's easy to set up too even for someone without much technical expertise. I use it to fix problems on my mother's computer. VNC on the other hand I can't figure out, and all I wanted was to connect a linux box to my OSX laptop.

    2. Re:Not all equal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps TV needs to use an encrypted auth key to make the connections instead of a simple 4 digit number, an auth key generated from a secure SSL Cert vendor maybe

  25. Re:'bout fucking time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, yes, I know there are valid, legitimate uses for Windows- I've used it myself on occasion. But the fact remains that probably 99.9999999% of its use is by scammers to fuck people out of their money and to drop malware on their PCs.

  26. Re: Help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First install a VM and put Linux in there so you can learn how to use it before it's all you've got.

  27. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  28. If My ISP Did this I would sue them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. I'd sue them for every minute of down time at a rate of $1000 per hour because they were committing fraud. blocking ports means its not an internet connection its something else.

  29. Driven By Corporate Greed by ytene · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I use a different UK telco/ISP as my service provider but I have seen exactly the same problem as those reported in the OP and in the linked article. The thing is, the issue isn't Teamviewer per se, or even that the ISP chose to unilaterally [and without consultation or warning] block the technology on their portion of the network]. These are symptoms and consequences of the real problem.

    The fundamental issue here is that the ISP in question chose to outsource a portion of its Customer Service function to a deprived area of India - an area where they could hire trained staff to work for a fraction of UK wages [about 20-25%] and thereby increase their profits by a corresponding amount. There are zero benefits to the customer from having a call centre in India - the only ones who get to benefit are the Directors, Senior Management and shareholders of the company in question.

    Up until March 2016 I received 2-3 such scam calls per week. Then one day one of the callers made a mistake and quoted a company-internal reference number from my telephone [landline] service provider. The quoted data was unique to me, only printed on my paper statement and unrelated to any other details about me. Armed with this [and a couple of related facts I managed to tease out of the caller] I got in touch with my telco's Fraud Prevention department and had a long discussion with one of their investigators. I asked that the person concerned cross-check their call database records from their call centre to see how many times my UK number was called, and on what occasions, and from which of their operators. I had enough information to persuade them that the attempted fraud calls were originating on their equipment - and suggested to the person that my telco's own call centre infrastructure was being used by a criminal group to perpetrate fraud against UK customers.

    At first I received bluster and pushback, at which point I suggested that in the event my telco did not take the matter seriously, I would complain to my Member of Parliament, the UK telecoms Regulator and the press.

    March 2016. Have not received a SINGLE fraudulent call since.

    The issue isn't TeamViewer. The issue is that TalkTalk have put their profits before safe business practices. Clearly they don't protect their client data, they don't screen their employees effectively and - if they are anything like my Telco - they don't even know when their own call centres are being used to perpetrate boiler-room fraud.

    I just wish that I could find someone in UK law enforcement willing to take this sort of thing seriously and start to see the large corporations prosecuted when their negligence endangers the safety of their clients. Unfortunately, until there are some serious fines handed down, or preferably until a couple of directors are jailed for breach of duty, negligence or malfeasance, this isn't going to change.

  30. Fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's your fraud right here: http://www.centurylink.com/datausage

  31. Re: Preventing stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sed s/teamviewer/anyservice/

    Fucking paranoid cunt.

  32. Nazi ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else can you say that? Discriminating one application.

    1. Re:Nazi ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must be from the far left...App Racism...

  33. It's always running though isn't it? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    If it's not running, then no security holes

    Part of the problem with Teamviewer is that after being installed it usually runs after every startup so those security holes are always open to anything that can get as far as your PC. I keep on finding it running on machines where the user has not used Teamviewer for well over a year.

    VNC on the other hand I can't figure out

    You probably had some problem such as firewall software in the way which made such an otherwise utterly trivial task difficult. It doesn't do as much as Teamviewer and is a lot simpler to set up and use, plus there has been around twenty years to shake out the bugs.

    1. Re:It's always running though isn't it? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "Part of the problem with Teamviewer is that after being installed it usually runs after every startup so those security holes are always open to anything that can get as far as your PC."

      Nope. That's only if you install the full teamviewer app; most people doing legitimate remote support with it with clients etc have the client run TeamViewerQS ("QS = QuickSupport); this (unlike the full teamviewer) only runs when it is explicitly run, only accepts incoming control sessions (intead of outgoing and meetings etc).

      It also requires no additional licensing for commercial use; and allows for corporate branding etc ... so it can display your logo, and they allow you to distribute it with your software or from your website etc.

      In my experience with it, virtually all vendors of software that use teamviewer for their remote support have give you the "QS" version.

      You probably had some problem such as firewall software in the way which made such an otherwise utterly trivial task difficult

      The reason a lot of people like TV more than VNC is that VNC pretty much always has "some problem such as firewall" that needs to be sorted out, and TV pretty much always just works.

      So on the scale of 'simpler to setup and use' TV generally ranks as excellent, and VNC usually ranks as "Did Not Finish... due to 'some problem'."

      plus there has been around twenty years to shake out the bugs.

      Which is great, but it lacks a lot of features remote support technicians find useful. chat, file transfer, leave a note, etc. Not to mention getting it through some random clients firewall usually runs into "some problem" so it doesn't work and wasting time on 'firewall problems' to get VNC working usually takes long than the original problem would have.

  34. Re:Preventing stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating Slashdot troll!

  35. It's bitztream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The custom EpiPen-hating, autism-hating, Musk-hating Slashdot troll!