Slashdot Mirror
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Allegedly Used Email Alias As Exxon CEO (arstechnica.com)
According to New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, Rex Tillerson used an email alias of "Wayne Tracker" to communicate with other Exxon executives about climate change while serving as CEO of Exxon Mobil. "New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has been leading an investigation of Exxon Mobil centered on whether the company misled investors by publicly arguing against the reality of climate change even though its executives knew the science was accurate," reports Ars Technica. "The investigation was triggered by news reports describing climate research the company undertook in the 1970s and 1980s, which affirmed the work of other climate scientists and showed that greenhouse gas emissions were causing climate change. Exxon buried that work and spent the next couple decades claiming that the science was unclear, although it has recently publicly acknowledged reality." From the report: The e-mails that were provided allowed the attorney general to figure out that Tillerson used the account between 2008 and 2015 at least, but it didn't appear on Exxon's list of accounts for which records were preserved. The letter also mentions 34 other e-mail accounts "specifically assigned to top executives, board members, or assistants" that the attorney general thinks should have been included. In a statement, an Exxon spokesperson explained, "The e-mail address, Wayne.Tracker@exxonmobil.com, is part of the company's e-mail system and was put in place for secure and expedited communications between select senior company officials and the former chairman for a broad range of business-related topics." The Office of the Attorney General's letter claims that "Exxon has continuously delayed and obstructed the production of documents from its top executives and board members, which are crucial to OAG's investigation into Exxon's touted risk-management practices regarding climate change."
and I approve of this message.
No text necessary
Socialism or barbarism! The workers must rule!
UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
Predicting the future science has been always as reliable as it is... this is completely ridiculous...
considering the fact that publicly funded institutions like universities etc bury politically incorrect results all the time...
Wow this story has:
AGW? check
Trump? check.
EMAILS!? check.
Which means I need:
popcorn? popcorn? Not check?!? No popcorn! Sad.
Someone had to do it.
Dude had IT set him up another account so he could surf porn... who hasn't?
Film at 11...eyeroll
There's no law against using an email alias. Why is anyone even talking about this?
Wrong because crooked hillery
Negr0e
Many of us in engineering field know better than to put anything down on email. Use personal face to face meetings or phone calls to discuss things and only use emails when everything is decided. This should be the standard practice. Otherwise you'll be opening yourself up to lawsuits when something you engineered fails and it shows you picked a less sound engineering option to save some money or there was a better engineering alternative you didn't take.
it could not, a company is not animate. People do things on behalf of the company. Thus it is people who misled investors, etc.
The difference is important because all too often they will let the company/corporation pick up the blame for what they did and pay any fines. Until executives start losing their homes and pensions their behaviour will not change, we will continue to see scandals such as this. I am not talking about making executives paying for mistakes, even bad ones, but for deliberate lies/... such as this.
Oh the horror, the horror! See it isn't wrong that Hillary did it!
but the purpose is the same as a political use: to hide something that you're afraid might backfire on you some day.
Would it be too much to ask that folks of great power and privilege conduct their affairs more honorably? Let's not forget he wasn't using the pseudonym for private communications... it was being used to deny global warming was anthropogenic after Exxon's own studies clearly indicated to the contrary.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
Like Exxon, I too am NOT the federal government.
Quit using my real name some 20 years ago. One email account is for real mail, closely guarded. The other is for everything else.
I get 2-3 messages a week in my real email, and 10-20 a day in the other one. I read maybe 2-3 of them.
when his salary depends on him not understanding it.
None of this matters. I don't care about climate change. I care about whether I'm going to have a job and whether my kid's gonna have a job because in our civilization those who work eat and those who don't starve.
It's impossible to have a meaningful discussion on climate change without socialism. As long as we accept that it's OK to abandon over half the populace to abject poverty in the name of freedom we have to accept that those people will oppose anything that takes away what little they have in the short term even with the promise of the long term. Like Trump said, these people have nothing to lose.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I have had 10 / 15? email address's since the early 90's and not one had my real name, not even my .gov or .mil address's.
The govt. computers did not like the way my name is spelled and it is not Bobby Drop Tables either.
Still have 4 or 5, only one that I use for real mail the rest are for sign-ups.
My e-mail address is fairly close in spelling to my real name, but not quite.
And I use mailinator too.
Passionately Indifferent
The people who are ruling our world are really a bunch of lying jackoffs. All the money, all the power, but they're still lying jackoffs.
You are welcome on my lawn.
From what I can tell, scientists are whores who will sell themselves to the highest bidder.
Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
The population will grow until it cannot be sustained, then we will be famine, or war, or disease. Many will flee, and we'll hear "I have money I was successful stop calling me a filthy immigrant and why aren't you helping me.. please help me" at the borders, complete with armed guards and razor wire. You may think "just as well we're building that wall", unless you understand that you cannot be sure which side of it you will be on. The population will be drastically reduced, and the cycle will repeat yet again.
For an animal with supposedly advanced cognitive abilities, we are incredibly short-sighted and still completely wired into our evolved base compulsions.
In short, I predict more stupidity.
It's a pretty safe bet.
Did he also do it to avoid FOIA requests while holding "Top Secret" clearance and exposing national secrets to foreign hacking? And did he do it on a private server accessible by a legion of people without such clearance? Or was that just Hillary Clinton?
Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
WOW, A Historic FIRST, /. slashdot THE FIRST HOMELESS SHOPPING CART, WITNESS IT NOW!
In the other thread on slashdot this afternoon, I didn't have any money to SEND in Gmail on android thread, So Instead I REQUESTED to whom it may concern, please give me some money in Gmail on android. I am certainly up for RECEIVING some money in Gmail on android so do send so I can receive.
my paycheck won't depend on anything except extra smart people like you sending me money in Gmail on android.
By the way I trust you can trust me, I mean I am the only one asking for money in Gmail on Android. This should clarify I am who I say I am even If I leave My ID and don't encrypt. In fact, you are so smart that your human intuition is BETTER than encryption. Encryption sucks when compared to smart people who send me money in Gmail on android like you.
I mean you could just buy me cool stuff off eBay and send me that too. But I don't see how you can get eBay through Gmail on android, so just send me money and then I can buy some shit on eBay. This makes more sense. We're rolling with this policy then. You send money and I will buy more shit.
Teach a man to hunt...4free stuff bitchez!
It's your motto, you can cry if you want to
Oh give me a break. You don't give a flying fuck about the poor. If you did, you would at least accept that climate change is going to inordinately effect them. But it will affect your kids as well, so it is clear you don't actually give a damn about then either. There are solutions that don't involve socialism, so that to is just a strawman.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Weather is not climate. You do understand what the "global" in global warming means, right? You did get far enough in school to learn about average and mean, it I assume so.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
And tell me that Exxon's $175 million 'put into trust for Tillerson', isn't really a payoff to leverage his position in government.
I'm sure we should just turn a blind eye to this, except Exxon's major investments are in Siberian oil fields and so *it* has to be Putin's bitch, which means Tillerson has to be Putin's bitch too.
But hey, sell your country out for your own interests Tillerson.
Russia is neither here nor there. They may have influence, they may not. What matters is that some state-level intelligence agency was able to disrupt the American electoral process. That's bad no matter what team you play for. Not only that, but now that it has been successful, do you think that will result in more attempts or fewer? And tell me, exactly how expensive is it to set up a team of hackers?
Russia is the least of our problems.
Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
Both Climate Change and Global Warming are accurate terms. Global Warming refers to the overall average in global temperatures (note: it says nothing about local trends that result). Climate Change is now used to refer to this phenomenon to avoid confusion when transient or localized cooling occurs because the Earth as a whole gets warmer which changes wind, ocean currents, and a myriad of other effects. Localized cooling does not mean that the globe isn't warming, and instead it generally only means that the heat you're accustomed to seeing is going somewhere else.
Consider a refrigerator. It does make your home warmer, however it clearly does make one localized area cooler (that is of course its purpose) but does so by removing heat from that one location and moving it elsewhere and since thermodynamics require that in doing so work must be done and that work must also generate heat the overall system is warmer (but with one localized area noticeably cooler and a much larger area subtly warmer).
I read mainstream stuff like the WSJ to see how writers mess up a story one way. I watch alternative news to see how someone can turn a slight misfortune by the ruling elite into them being utterly ruined. Stefan Molyneux has some interesting back and forth. MatPat has interesting content as does the skeptic community.
Why, all it takes to outwit them there government revenuers, I mean regulators, is just a email alias. Hell, even I cun unnderstand tha-ut.
Seriously, an email alias was his cover? Geesh!
What is necessary is for polluters to pay the full price of the damage that they are doing to the environment. This can be achieved by carbon pricing in the case of the flap over climate change, which can occur without 'socialism' as such. If however you fail to implement that, it's as immoral as dumping sewage on someone's front garden or graffiting priceless painting...
If a small company was being investigated and their emails were significant to the crime, then there would be no problem with grabbing everything despite the damage that it would do to the small firm. Yet when a big firm is being investigated, they are free to hand over what they feel like. A similar problem was visible when News International was done in the UK over its phone hacking behaviour. A little less subtly from prosecutors would be welcome!
Boo hoo.
BeauHD posting another anti Trump, climate change story on a tech site. I believe in climate change but we don't need OMG TRUMP GLOBAL WARMING every other day.
(Just look at his twitter feed, especially from the election, it is cesspool of far left dribble)
Lying to Congress under oath is a crime...
Clinton
Clapper
Holder
Deleting 30000 emails subpoenaed by Congress in an investigation is a crime...
Clinton
"No reasonable prosecutor would file charges"
This is well intentioned but inaccurate. The predominant theory in the 19th and early 20th Century was that the climate did not change, that it was solely cyclical and that warm years would cancel out cold ones. Theories of climate change were still necessary even in the 19th Century to explain ice ages. That mankind could do anything to affect the climate, and that the effect of this would be warming, was established separately from the idea that long-term climate could change. The two terms are used interchangeably today for fairly obvious reasons.
Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
As I replied to the other poster, the idea that climate could change at all was established separately from the idea that man could affect the climate. The two terms are nowadays synonymous. You are of course completely dependent on the fruits of science and certainly know very little about anything.
As it happens, AGW is at least as well established as Relativity, and it predates it. You could verify the theory in your basement. Why do you not feel ashamed of your ignorance?
Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
EPA head Lisa Jackson, also used an alias to communicate at the EPA. She was known as Richard Windsor. Funny how that wasn't a scandal.
There are solutions that don't involve socialism
Yeah, if you consider things like war, famine and disease solutions. One way or another the population is going to adjust to a new equilibrium in the not too distant future due to climate change. Nothing can prevent that now. In fact, it's probably too late to prevent our ultimate extinction now too. Given these realities, I'd rather enjoy what time I have left in some relative level of comfort instead of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic or arguing with others about their best arrangement while the ship heads for the bottom.
It's impossible to have a meaningful discussion on climate change without socialism.
No, you've picked up a cheap trick from the denialist crowd which sounds convincing but is wrong. It's an argument in the gamut of "we don't know, the evidence isn't there, the evidence is fiddled, ok the evidence is right but we don't know people are doing it and finally it's too political to discuss properly".
SJW n. One who posts facts.
The reason you see more snow is because increased evaporation causes increased condensation, which tends to cause larger and more violent snowfalls. That doesn't change that the winter is warmer on average than it used to be, that we're getting record-setting temperatures every year and every season, that we're getting more killer storms these days, that former temperate regions are now drying up, etc.
A snowstorm is weather. Years and decades worth of weather is climate. And some use the term 'climate change' politically now to explain global warming because they know some people refuse to accept global warming because they saw snow in the winter.
It's impossible to have a meaningful discussion on climate change without socialism.
No, you've picked up a cheap trick from the denialist crowd which sounds convincing but is wrong.
I'm sorry, which word do you think is wrong? All government which attempts to serve the people is socialist by definition. Therefore all government except perhaps our current one is partly socialist by definition. The only thing left to argue about is what percentage socialist a government is. If it does things for everyone, that's socialism. It's not a bad word.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Ah yes, the old "eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we shall die" line. There's no evidence that humans are going to go extinct. Life will become more expensive for many, for many it will become worse, and for some it will likely mean death. You're just trying to mask your lack of desire to actually do anything in some sort of hedonistic nihilism. It's pathetic, in part because I think even you know what you're claiming is pure bullshit, and in part because it betrays just how selfish you really are.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
"The Office of the Attorney General's letter claims that "Exxon has continuously delayed and obstructed the production of documents from its top executives and board members, which are crucial to OAG's investigation into Exxon's touted risk-management practices regarding climate change." This is laughable as the growing body of accurate and confirmed scientific evidence shows no CO2 driven climate change, and no warming outside of the normal Nino for the past 18+ years.
I'm sorry, which word do you think is wrong?
It's the meaning of the sentence that's not correct.
All government which attempts to serve the people is socialist by definition.
Erm, I'm not sure precisely what you mean. Also, aren't we talking about climate change?
Therefore all government except perhaps our current one is partly socialist by definition
I don't think that's a commonly accepted definition of socalism to be honest.
The only thing left to argue about is what percentage socialist a government is.
Well, OK, that's fair. No government is pure, 100% anything despite the party rhetoric. Stanuchly capitalistic governments will have social programs. Even the loony left politicians *cough*Corbyn*cough* don't disclaim private ownership of property and businesses. All governments exist on a spectrum of varying degrees, though calling a government with some socialist policies "socialist" will cause confusion.
It's not a bad word.
True but your statement is still not correct. There's a lot to climate change. You can have discussions about the science, likely outcomes from a physical geographic point of view, forcing factors, oscillations, effect and lifetime of various greenhouse gasses and aerosols without invoking socialism at all.
To be clear: I wasn't accusing you of being a denialist, but the tactic of trying to mix up politics with it is one used by denialists because it's a good way to sow doubt: people disagree on politics and if it's mixed up with the science then by extension some peopple will end up "disagreeing" with the science. It's something taken out of the playbook of the tobacco companies and is a subtle and effective trick.
I was more warning of the dangers of bringing up the two together.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
So North Korea is the only non-socialist government (and even that is up to debate)?
Is that some sort of inverse "no true scotsman" thing?
Hint: If you define a word so it applies to everything, you almost certainly have the definition wrong or you're a troll.
(whether socialist is/should be considered a bad thing is a different question)
Lots of executives been doing this forever...
Our system conspires by its very structure to allow crimes against the public. Exon does a great wrong. Exon pays a huge fine. Exon passes along the fine as an additional cost for the public to buy gasoline. The public is punished. OK, so we through some Exon executives in prison. The public pays for those prison sentences, trails etc.. If we really want to punish companies tactics such as shutting them down in a number of states for a few years might work. For example we could disallow Exon to sell any products east of the Mississippi river for a ten year period. They would feel that deeply.