Slashdot Mirror


Firefox for Linux is Now Netflix Compatible (betanews.com)

Brian Fagioli, writing for BetaNews: For a while, Netflix was not available for traditional Linux-based operating systems, meaning users were unable to enjoy the popular streaming service without booting into Windows. This was due to the company's reliance on Microsoft Silverlight. Since then, Netflix adopted HTML5, and it made Google Chrome and Chromium for Linux capable of playing the videos. Unfortunately, Firefox -- the open source browser choice for many Linux users -- was not compatible. Today this changes, however, as Mozilla's offering is now compatible with Netflix!

42 of 71 comments (clear)

  1. Boot Windows? What? by subk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's utter bullshit. I am no longer a Netflix customer, but for several recent years I was able to view it just fine using Chromium + Widevine. A quick search on the subject will reveal that Windows is not needed. Who writes this shit?

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  2. Something something DRM... by thegreatbob · · Score: 2

    Anybody have any technical details on why it was not previously possible? My understanding is that it has been possible (at least for a while, possibly since FF49) with the Widevine plugin + spoofing a Chrome user agent.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Something something DRM... by corychristison · · Score: 2

      I think it's that Netflix no longer forces the FF UserAgent to the sliverlight version.

      Nothing to see here, move along.

    2. Re:Something something DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing Netflix supports Mozilla's EME now?

    3. Re:Something something DRM... by TWX · · Score: 1

      How about never. Does never work for you?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Something something DRM... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Current technical reason: Firefox 52 no longer supports sound on any sane Linux system.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:Something something DRM... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Possible, but difficult. I could never get Netflix and HBO Go to work at the same time. :(

  3. Re:Boot Windows? What? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Here's a quick rewrite:

    Until now, Netflix video could not be watched using Firefox on Linux without some monkeying around. Now it can. Enjoy!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. This is why by jwymanm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The new installer script for latest Firefox fixed this issue and that pesky having plugins problem:
    #!/bin/sh
    ln -s /usr/bin/google-chrome /usr/bin/mozilla-firefox

    1. Re:This is why by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      In other words, it wasn't a priority for Firefox to address. Wonder if the priorities shifted, or whether it was something to do now that they have time..

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    2. Re:This is why by roca · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firefox has been ready for a while. The problem was Netflix sniffing the Linux user-agent and going down the Silverlight path. Now Netflix has fixed that.

      One of the many things that's hard about building a browser is taking the blame for stuff like this.

  5. ARM Versions by phorm · · Score: 2

    Would this work for an ARM version of Firefox (e.g. so it could be run on a Raspberry Pi) ?

    1. Re:ARM Versions by phorm · · Score: 1

      What "player" is this?

    2. Re:ARM Versions by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      No. This is 100% reliant upon DRM plugins called CDMs (Content Decryption Modules) that are OS, browser and architecture dependent. You will never be able to use this on any architecture they don't explicitly allow.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:ARM Versions by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      What "player" is this?

      Probably the Widevine CDM which is what Chrome and Chromium uses. It doesn't as much play as decode.

  6. YAY! by jediborg · · Score: 2

    No longer must i use google chrome on my linux laptop to watch netflix!!! Now using a linux OS for my home media server makes sense, now that it can download movies/tv shows and play them using the builtin free software bittorent client, and VLC, it can also play netflix and youtube on a television as well. Now the only thing i need windows for is my gaming machine.

    until SteamOS finally catches on

  7. Re:And ARM? by TWX · · Score: 1

    Pshaw. Call me when it works on my Palm TX.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  8. Re: Boot Windows? What? by thundercattt · · Score: 1

    Not everyone uses teh Goole Chrome. Iceweasel was the way to go. Now they got it working, I no longer have an account due to shrinking library of classics.

  9. Re:And ARM? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Let me know when it works in Aweb on my Amiga 4000.

  10. Re:Why not just write an application. by iampiti · · Score: 2

    It depends on the purpose of the application, performance requeriments, etc but I usually prefer websites to applications. On something like Netflix I certainly prefer a website. The greatest advantage is that it works everywhere there's a browser (a few pretty specific browsers in this case).
    Anyway, what I really hate is things that could perfectly be delivered through the web to force you to access the content through an app only. I have to little free room on my phone I don't need an app for every website I could conceivably want to visit

  11. Re: The fucking Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's certainty very uncivilised not doing this with a drone.

  12. Re:And ARM? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    You can extract the wide-vine extension from something running chome os and then change your agent string...

    it'll run but it's stupid slow even on the pi3

  13. Web app by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    My TV's Netflix app simply wraps a customized browser loading a local web app which uses ajax to talk with netflix. Then they used some sort of browser plug in or modification to get to whatever video library the device supported.

    Why wouldn't netflix use a similar approach for all it's apps from toaster to xbox??

    You can make a local web app that would fool almost anybody with a properly customized browser (using local OS library means it wouldn't take much ram since it's likely loaded anyhow.)

    Less development and support related issues; every device has some working browser library and video decoder if hardware support is available.

  14. It's about damned time by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I recall using Ubuntu 12.04 and had to do agent switchers, install a bunch of stuff just to watch Netflix videos.

  15. Re:Boot Windows? What? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I'm an admin and I don't have a problem tinkering around with Linux. But when I run into this kind of crap that has to be done because company X refuses to do things in a standard way, I tend to just go back to Windows 7 for awhile and wait until the issue is taken care of in a better way by someone.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  16. How come html5 but not on firefox? by mugurel · · Score: 1

    If netflix has been using html5 video rather than silverlight, why didn't this work on firefox earlier? Can you imagine I even read TFA to find out, to no avail.

    1. Re:How come html5 but not on firefox? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      HTML 5 video has many mechanisms to restrict media access based on client properties. For example, there is a robustness parameter which implementations are expected to evaluate according to their perceived ability to prevent user-controlled access to content.

      I suspect that Widevine (the DRM plugin used by Firefox) did not provide a robustness level on Linux which Netflix was comfortable with. To a degree, this is still ongoing. I think the maximum resolution you can get on Linux still is 720p, while Windows will go to at 1080p at least.

    2. Re:How come html5 but not on firefox? by roca · · Score: 1

      Because of user-agent sniffing by Netflix.

  17. Only SD though. by agoodm · · Score: 1

    I just tried Netflix in Chrome and Firefox on Ubuntu. It works but only in standard def for me. Amazon prime video was similar, it worked but only SD. I've cancelled both subscriptions. I dont get why they place these restrictions; theyre inconveniencing paying customers whilst not preventing the ripping of the content. Loose loose situation?!

    1. Re:Only SD though. by gravewax · · Score: 1

      because it is the distributers not Netflix that set the requirements for what security/DRM mechanisms you need to support for HD. If google or Mozilla implement something acceptable to the content providers then Netflix can provide it. Netflix is the only the middle man in this situation.

    2. Re: Only SD though. by agoodm · · Score: 2

      Who is the middle man in this though when I'm watching Netflix original content? I was allowed much higher data rates on a Windows box.

  18. Re:NO MORE "BetaNews" SUBMISSIONS, PLEASE! by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    This "BrianFagioli" character is associated with several of the recent submissions. Does he benefit in some way from this publicity that Slashdot is giving this "BetaNews" site?

    This is Slashdot. No one actually reads the articles.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  19. Bullshit! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    They call it "plugin free" but then what the fuck are Content Decryption Modules? I'll tell you what they are, they are the OS, platform and architecture dependent DRM plugins that Firefox uses. Try putting Firefox on your Raspberry Pi and you'll see it will not work.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Bullshit! by phorm · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was wondering about. I would absolutely love if this allowed it to work on a PI, but if there's still some dependency on a module that isn't available on ARM, it's probably a no-go.

      Then again, I've heard of people getting it to work on Chromium by grabbing bits and pieces from a Chromebook (which can play Netflix), so it's still possible AFAIK.

      I'm actually OK with DRM modules so long as they follow a known, open standard (and yes, this can be done, much like encryption). Anything else is "security" by obscurity anyhow.

  20. HBO GO did this some time ago by adam_rotaru · · Score: 1

    HBO's GO service in Central Europe was similar: worked only in Chrome on Linux, but since about a month it's working with Firefox on Linux too (HTML5-based).

  21. Still wont re-subscribe by Joshs922 · · Score: 1

    This is good news, no doubt, and long overdue.. I mean, cumon, really? Microsoft Silverlight required? What was up with that anyway? We still won't resubscribe after the "Dear White People" debacle though. We're getting our streaming stuff elsewhere.

  22. Re:Boot Windows? What? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You've made Mary Pickford very sad...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  23. One Streaming Service Down by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

    99% still inhibited by ridiculous artificial restrictions

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  24. Re:Why not just write an application. by alantus · · Score: 2

    And while they're at it, an officially supported Netflix addon for Kodi would be great too!

  25. Re:Netflicks? by grcumb · · Score: 1

    People still pay for that stuff? Why?

    You do know there are streaming sites out there which remove all the commercials, offer closed captioning, and a selectable quality from 360p-1080p.

    I would be totally cool with a working Netflix plugin for my linux-based Kodi installation. I have no problem handing Netflix a tenner every month just to get reliable access to the content they host.

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  26. EME by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    If I understand correctly, it uses a binary-blob provided, architecture-dependant DRM called CDM

    Would EME be an implemented standard, that restriction would be lifted. DRM in a W3C standard may have some good points, after all.

  27. Re:Why not just write an application. by jbr439 · · Score: 1

    And while they're at it, an officially supported Netflix addon for Kodi would be great too!

    It could not come soon enough.