Slashdot Mirror


Terrifying Anti-Riot Vehicle Created To Quash Any Urban Disturbance (boingboing.net)

"Are you an urban police force thinking about how to control your fellow humans?" jokes Cory Doctorow. "Look no farther! Your pals at Bozena have an all-new RIOT system, a crowd-control killdozer for all your protest-suppressing needs!" He's one of several web commentators marveling at the marketing copy for a Slovakian company's new anti-riot machinery, also spotted by Slashdot reader drunkdrone. Some quotes from the BOZENA RIOT SYSTEM site about the device's features:
  • Easy attachable bulldozer blade.
  • The [6,600 pound] shield comes equipped with launching ports designed for use of guns or other rubber projectiles launchers.
  • The trailer is capable of displacing the water/foam or its mixtures (available additives: pepper or painting substances) under the high pressure into the distance of several dozen meters.
  • Communication with rioters through the loudspeakers.
  • Designed to control riots in streets and urbanized areas...intended predominantly for the special military and police units responsible for the CROWD CONTROL during the violent political/social demonstrations, against football hooligans, etc.

195 comments

  1. It's Slovak, not Slovenian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wondered when a one of our companies went into EOD machinery construction, but a look at the web page told me that it's Slovak not Slovenian :) We seem to do explosive ordnance clearing through fundraising and "manual labor" - http://www.itf-fund.si/.

    1. Re:It's Slovak, not Slovenian by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      And they should give it the designation ED-209.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:It's Slovak, not Slovenian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good old Manual! Doing the jobs Americans won't!

  2. maidanist recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the maidanist recipe for this is to borrow a tractor, forklift or other apparatus, which can lift the side panels of the plow.

    Also, protesters inclined towards ninjitsu might jump onto it with nice neodymium magnets, and just stick there, well protected against cops, while cutting through it with blowtorches or disc cutters.

    Unfortunately, though, I can foresee that with this kind of toys, the business of protesting or suppressing protests, is going to get increasingly violent. Whether that should be avoided, I leave for others to figure out.

    1. Re:maidanist recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      P.S. Additional tip: when you can foresee that the protest you attend is going to be pushed back with such devices, always bring a battery powered perforator drill and steel pipe of sufficient quantity.

      Then feel free to drill into pavement as deep as needed, and install posts which prevent a large vehicle from squeezing forward.

      If you however have a welder nearby, you can design cheap and sturdy anti-vehicle obstacles which don't need deep drilling at all.

      Also, consider putting a leash on the police vehicle with steel cables... I dunno... maybe to lamp posts or some such fixed infrastructure.

    2. Re:maidanist recipe by Z80a · · Score: 1

      It looks like something you can just go around or worse, get pushed and crushed around it by the crowd itself.

    3. Re:maidanist recipe by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Well, the maidanist recipe for this is to borrow a tractor, forklift or other apparatus, which can lift the side panels of the plow.

      This seems very complicated. About some c four?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    4. Re:maidanist recipe by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Also, consider putting a leash on the police vehicle with steel cables... I dunno... maybe to lamp posts or some such fixed infrastructure.

      What movie was that already? Or was it Duke of Hazzard? Anyway, they tie a chain to the rear axle of a patrol car and when the car takes off, when it reaches the length of the chain, the axle and wheels stay there and the car continue moving...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    5. Re:maidanist recipe by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      P.S. Additional tip: when you can foresee that the protest you attend is going to be pushed back with such devices, always bring a battery powered perforator drill and steel pipe of sufficient quantity.

      Either that or tool up with an AssBlaster or Dildozer, which would see this woosy thing off no problems, as long as Beef Supreme is driving it.

    6. Re:maidanist recipe by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Can't you see the writing on the wall???? It was American Graffitti Oh, those happy days.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re: maidanist recipe by slick7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      All the better for Soylent Green processing.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    8. Re:maidanist recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh,
          If rocks arent going to work, violent mobs will just resort to molotov cocktails.

    9. Re:maidanist recipe by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      it actually looks great as a temp baracade setup on things like parade routes and other things. much quicker to just roll in and -park vs rollin, unload baracades,put them in place and do the reverse when the event is over.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re: maidanist recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to issue flamethrowers to the police. Do you know what happens to a black bloc thug when you torch it? The same thing that happens to anything else.

    11. Re:maidanist recipe by murphtall · · Score: 1

      It was an 80s movie. A comedy. A bad one. Maybe Police Academy 5?

    12. Re:maidanist recipe by mspohr · · Score: 1
      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    13. Re:maidanist recipe by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      What about the antihippie drill? All it requires is a pilot, a scientist, an engineer, and a token black guy to sacrifice himself if something goes wrong. Surely it can be reconfigured to work against non-hippie rabble rouser protestors?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    14. Re: maidanist recipe by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I was surprised that nobody mentioned Soylent Green - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  3. Worst of all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As if living in a police state wasn't enough... From the picture and video tabs:

    "You need to upgrade your Macromedia Flash Player! Get Macromedia Flash"

    1. Re:Worst of all. by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you going to do ? Protest ?

    2. Re:Worst of all. by ls671 · · Score: 2

      Get Macromedia Flash"

      What is that "Macromedia Flash"? Some kind of mega flash bang?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:Worst of all. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, technically it was designed as a flashbang, but a lot of people had to learn the hard way that it can explode rather violently if tampered with.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Worst of all. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The bastards.

      (I was coming here to make the same type of comment with a link - http://www.bozena.eu/pictures-... )

    5. Re:Worst of all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they're not even going to pay you five bucks to do it.

  4. it was really designed to be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trump's new presidential limousine.

  5. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're good for getting free stuff and winning people whose businesses you destroy to your cause as well as driving them out of neighborhoods.

  6. Make Room! Make Room! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is right out of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Room!_Make_Room!

    1. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      And the movie version, Soylent Green.

  7. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do no good at all. Only idiots or hired thugs engage in protests of any kind.

    Into which category would you place Gandhi? Rosa Parks?

  8. you have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that thing look like it would be effective no matter what you think politically.

    1. Re:you have to admit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. Mostly because it doesn't look like it can easily move that shield out of the way of an obstacle that's trivial to place on the street.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:you have to admit by bigfoottoo · · Score: 1
  9. Re: Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just had just seen him but he went to another forum think he was looking for you but looked lost.

  10. In stead of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... negotiating and listening to the protesters arguments just wipe them out. Nice move in a democracy. Or are these machine intended for exporting to already dictatorial regimes?

    And how will violent rioters respond, firearms and bulldozers jacked from work sites?

    1. Re:In stead of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Abatis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abatis made from lampposts in Urban setting.

      Easy peasy.

      Cap: blackly

  11. The scoops are coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get in here Soylent Green fans.

    1. Re:The scoops are coming! by ls671 · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a secret Soylent Green attachment that grabs people from the crowd and transform them instantaneously into Soylent Green thanks to the incorporated factory.

      It is a little like factory ships.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  12. Hot summer day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hose me down whenever you'd like!

  13. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    It's not like a lot of protesters riot.

    But ... well, let's put it that way: Rioters give the authorities a good excuse to end a protest. Draw your own conclusions.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The lucky ones that did it before governments found a neat way to end protests in a way that has the support of the general population.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. news for nerds, stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's paying for this stuff to get posted, anyway?

  16. I have no subject please stop asking for subjects by pele · · Score: 0

    Since when does this have anything to do with Slashdot?

  17. Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by dwywit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a good chance that this machine's software/interfaces will have....inadequate security. Someone, somewhere, will achieve control over it, and then when it turns on the thin blue line behind it, ostensibly waiting to "clean up" the now-subdued rioters, there will be some outrage from the police department/s who bought it, some swift spin from the manufacturer, and the units will either 1. be withdrawn, or 2. given a firmware upgrade, in which case, see above.

    At the very least, someone will be able to jam its communication, rendering it unresponsive.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    1. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a blind spot right next to the wall and underneath the water cannon. Some wedge shaped blocks of steel with spikes at the bottom and that machine will just end up off the road.

    2. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a good chance that this machine's software/interfaces will have....inadequate security.

      Nothing I can see in the article suggests that this machine contains any software, or any interfaces other than your standard steering wheel/brake/accelerator. What are you referring to?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a good chance this machine's armor plating has inadequate security. I can' think of a device that would prompt people the USA to devise roadside bombs more effectively than seeing something like this. People adapt to their environment, give them an environment that treats them as a threat, and they will eventually become a threat.

    4. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You put .308/.30-06 rounds into the cab/windscreen and when the driver/operator raises the blade to shield him/themselves, take out the guys shielding themselves behind the 'blade' and the vehicle's tires.

      Or, you could go the flamethrower route.

      https://youtu.be/BYgnOc6Cd34

    5. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the article fails to mention it is remote-controlled

    6. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll add wedge shaped blocks of steel to my list of items to bring to a violent protest

    7. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it has a 2-meter wide thermal exhaust port that can be exploited.

    8. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has an audio network at the very least (loudspeakers to "communicate" with protesters), an engine or motor with a modern ECU, and is operated by humans, the most hackable thing on the planet.

    9. Re:Hacked in 3, 2, 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics on the site show a couple of UHF antenna whips sticking up from the cab area.

  18. Re:Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but I hat cats and the accompanying catty women.

    If I see a cat on my property, It'll get a .22LR between the ears.

    Go fuck yourself.

  19. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by religionofpeas · · Score: 0

    Blaming government agents for starting riots is a good trick to get away with it.

  20. Re:Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban guns

  21. Re:Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the highway. I'm pretty sure that wasn't a speed bump.

  22. Bulldozer blade? by tacarat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't see anywhere to scoop up rioters to take to the factory. Soylent Green won't make itself!

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:Bulldozer blade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's to pick up the dead bodies after running them over several times.

    2. Re:Bulldozer blade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will make itself if you order it to, and taste doubleplus good for it.

    3. Re:Bulldozer blade? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      The Blade is canted to push everyone into the path of the Harvester. Which collects, grinds and processes the rioters into Soylent, which is then returned to the trailer of the dozer to be fed to the remaining rioters via the high-pressure cannon. Nothing dispels a riot quite like still-warm fresh Soylent.

  23. But it has a low emission engine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the TFTFA:

        "Engine low emission (EURO 3) Deutz, turbo, Common Rail"

    I wonder wheter they got EU funding. After all, we need some Plan B for the case Erdogan goes out of control and lets all thos refugees pass to the west.

    (Disclaimer: as an EUsian I'm deeply ashamed by the politics my countries are implementing right now -- and even more ashamed by all those populist assholes).

  24. Yeah, real "terrifying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://imgur.com/ibA8119

    It's basically a baby-blue enclosed forklift with a pump system, a water trailer, and a shield on the front. So terrifying.

    1. Re:Yeah, real "terrifying" by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      It's basically a baby-blue enclosed forklift with a pump system, a water trailer, and a shield on the front. So terrifying.

      It's not the implementation that makes it terrifying, it's the use case.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Yeah, real "terrifying" by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Kitchen knife use case #1: Kill insufficiently Muslim heathens working for the oppressive British Government! (this use case was seen just the other day)

      Kitchen knife use case #2: Make a sandwich. (this use case also seen just the other day)

      Maybe you don't have the problem. But, for example, a city here in our state has been known to have a problem with "protesters" deciding that they're going to fix the problems with the culture in their local neighborhood by smashing the few remaining businesses in that neighborhood and burning the houses of the few little old ladies who haven't already decided they'd be safer living elsewhere as a homeless street person than in the middle of place like that.

      The cops are too scared to even attempt to mitigate all of that violence and destruction unless they have function physical protection while trying to push a mob of looting arsonists away from the stores they're trying to destory. A tool that helps them to do that is a good thing. If somebody has a problem with the fact that a politician with the wrong idea about things might use such a tool to chase away people who aren't being violent and destructive, then they need to vote for different politicians. In the meantime, recognize the fact that there actually ARE violent, destructive herds of "protesters" who actually do get together to destroy and smash and steal things, and that it's absurd to tell a police officer to risk being, say, burned alive or having her head caved in to try to repel looters. A tool is a tool. There are always going to be outlandish or absurd use cases. If there is NO good use case (say... police batons with spikes on them?) then of course the tool is worth ridiculing. Giving cops a tool to protect themselves while preserving others' lives and property is a good thing. Misusing it is a bad thing, but that's true of cop cars and every other tool they've always had.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Yeah, real "terrifying" by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Just keep in mind that the people who got together to destroy and smash and steal things, were probably put up to it be the very cops that are driving this thing around.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  25. deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Technology like this isnt helping riot control. its dangerous brinkmanship. Once you start deploying autonomous anti-personnel devices like MRAPS's and BOZENA, youve made citzens aware that not only do you not care about the current reason theyre rioting but you're willing to herd them like cattle instead of take the time to listen.

    Treat people like expendable trash and theyll fight you in ways you wouldnt expect. in Texas it meant after a slew of police shootings of unarmed black men, a black man took up a sniper position and began executing police from a rooftop with a high power rifle. if your only answer to systemic inequality is to deploy a 6600 pound shield, you'll soon find how resilient it is to firearms that are many, many times more powerful than what you would normally be faced with in a riot situation.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But wait a moment, were you under impression that people a are *not* expendable trash for the purposes of any and all governments out there? People are expendable trash, they are to be taxed, sent to fight in wars and military conflicts that are one way or another profitable to those in the government offices.

    2. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Government the bigger and more remote it gets the more it looks upon the population as a herd to be managed, rather than as their friends and neighbors.

      This why our system was originally designed to have powerful states and keep a lot of administrative control with even smaller units counties and cities. Modern federalism is nothing more than a system of abuse. The very fact that almost all of us have a higher federal tax bill than state tax bill tells you the system is probably corrupted beyond fixing.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No,
      That is not how it works.
      their are places and times there things like this are needed simply to keep football fans form killing eachother. Preventing a bunch of football fans from burning a city to the ground only improves social cohesion.

      And it has been proven time and again, through statistics and police testing, that police are far less likely to shoot a black man than a white man, all else held equal. Additionally the rate of police shootings have been plummeting over the last decades.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      And it has been proven time and again, through statistics and police testing, that police are far less likely to shoot a black man than a white man, all else held equal.

      It has been proven time and again that all else is not held equal. The police are for example more commonly deployed to harass people in black neighborhoods. They're more likely to encounter a black man.

      Additionally the rate of police shootings have been plummeting over the last decades.

      How would you know when the statistics are deliberate lies?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that these police have a strong preference for shooting white people? What about asians, where do they fit in?

    6. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Encountering has little effect, police encounter pretty much every human in America on a daily basic, and infact encounter other police a disproportionate amount (and yet police shooting police hardly ever happened).
      If you rob a store, if you murder someone, if you run around the streets with a gun, if you shoot at a police officer. The chance of you ending up killed by police is X if you are white.
      If you are black, it is a small fraction of X.

      Every single serious violent crime is responded to, police encounter every single criminal. They shoot the white ones and peacefully arrest the black ones.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I am not implying. I am stating it as a known fact. I am not sure where Asians come in, but they commit basically zero violent crimes, and very very few are shoot each year (less per their population than whites). This probably means that an Asian criminal is far more likely to be shot, but their criminal element is like 1% of that of other races.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police are deployed to neighborhoods where crime is happening, trust me they'd rather be just about anywhere else. The second they stop deploying to black neighborhoods because of people like you, the number of black lives mattering will skyrocket due to unchecked black on black crime.

      Also, the author of that article is a sensationalist twit. There's no law requiring those departments report to the FBI, and the FBI never claimed their numbers were exact. WHEN ASKED, 105 out of 110 gave their numbers. The author presents no evidence that anyone is trying to hide info or deceive, they just aren't participating in yet another bureaucratic expense.

    9. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police are for example more commonly deployed to harass people in black neighborhoods. They're more likely to encounter a black man.

      If they're deployed to black neighbourhoods - whether to harass or otherwise - they're going to be disproportionately encountering blacks, yes. But that's not going to make them disproportionately encounter specifically black men. So why are black men killed so much more often than black women - or white men killed so much more often than women of any colour?

    10. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unarmed black men WHO RESISTED ARREST VIOLENTLY, WERE TOLD NOT TO MOVE OR OTHERWISE THREATENED THE POLICE.

      ftfy.

      True story:

      I've had a cop with his hand on his gun - which pretty much means this is going to escalate to a shoot-to-kill situation- face off with me four yards away and give me instructions (stop there- don't move). Know what I did?

      I stopped there and didn't move.

      Know why I'm alive ? Because I understood that whatever the reason for the cop telling me to do that, (mistaken identity I fit the description) things could go very badly for this unarmed and innocent civilian.

      I could have put the cop in a position where he had to shoot me just by moving never mind resisting arrest, but I didn't. I just did EXACTLY what he said in the manner he said without saying jack shit. That's how you get detained / arrested and live to tell about it.

      I am white, but I fit the description, so tough cookies for me. That wasn't the first time that happened to me BTW. It's not a black thing- it's a high crime area thing. If you live in a high crime area, you WILL fit the description if something just happened while you're outside "just minding you own business".

      Imagine if I had done anything other than 100% comply and I was black. Viola, another picture-perfect BLM "outrage" is born even though the cop was doing everything as he's supposed to with no malice in his heart.

      You have no idea what information the police are working from when they interact with you, however, if their hand is on the butt of their gun, assume the worst. If there are a lot of them and they're surrounding you , assume the worst. It will all get sorted out later if you do just as they say.

      Society can't ask cops to repeatedly roll the dice with their lives in a series of good will gestures intended to pacify people whose real problem vis-s-vis society in their own numerical and statistical illiteracy:

      http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#

    11. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Encountering has little effect, police encounter pretty much every human in America on a daily basic

      And they are overwhelmingly racially biased against blacks, so they're looking harder for evidence of a crime. And they send them into neighborhoods with more blacks looking for crimes.

      and infact encounter other police a disproportionate amount (and yet police shooting police hardly ever happened).

      Which is too bad, because cops commit crimes at about the same rate as the general population, except rape. They are approximately four times as rapey as the general populace.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Government the bigger and more remote it gets the more it looks upon the population as a herd to be managed, rather than as their friends and neighbors.

      [US politician] "I agree! We need to take action immediately! We will create a new Cabinet-level post and an entire new Federal Department (complete with fully-auto rifles, grenade launchers, .50-cal heavy machine guns, MRAPs, and SWAT teams like the Social Security Administration and EPA) to address this injustice! We are currently in serious discussions with concerned citizen-group leaders, meeting in our new 'domestic negotiation center' located at Guantanamo." [/US politician]

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    13. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are pointing out something that both sides of the BLM debate seem to miss: most of the problems black people have (in above average numbers, per capita) are shared with people living in poor communities. Honestly, this is my perception of the black problem. Black people, on average, live in shittier areas. Black people could not feel the decaying cities as easily as white people (not even close, there was a lot of discrimination), creating most of this imbalance. So, we have too *big* problems:

      1. 1. Being poor in the USA is very shitty, shittier than most people will admit. We have a problem with basic dignity where police can most likely shoot people in poor areas in the back and not take too much heat (historically). This is the point of your story. I completely agree with that, and it's a real problem.
      2. 2. Black people are much more likely to be poor. This is also a big problem.

      I actually think #2 would be easier to solve in, say, a generation. Do we have any hope on #1?

    14. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But that is the opposite of reality. Black neighborhoods have a far far lower police presence in regards to the crime rate. The safest whitest neighborhoods show many times more police stops and police presence per crime committed. Look at the numbers for police actions in New York for example. The black neighborhoods have a proportionate amount of police stops to the crime rate. while the white neighborhoods have over twice as much police action and presence per crime.

      Crime and our statistics on it do not just come from police reports (this is not a he said she said scenario). Victims and witnesses come forward, non-police talk to these people get their statements, and occasional we even do national surveys on them. According to witnesses, according to victims, police arrests correspond to crimes committed, not some imaginary bias. Do you really think that millions of victims and witnesses annually are police plants? Paid to frame some black guy for a white crime?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    15. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Black people are much more likely to be poor. This is also a big problem.

      I actually think #2 would be easier to solve in, say, a generation.

      Sure. I think with a generation to work with, we can easily send them all back to Africa.

    16. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that millions of victims and witnesses annually are police plants?

      All it takes is one, and the police lose their credibility.

      More than one.

      And the actual level of bias has been documented in reports too.

      https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/883366/download
      https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/925846/download
      https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-findings-two-civil-rights-investigations-ferguson-missouri

      Of course, you might not want to admit it, but your own argument undercuts your position. You basically said that the New York police have LESS interest in black neighborhoods, which does them no credit. Sorry, but reality intrudes on your own argument, as you are only establishing that the police are failing.

    17. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Nice trolling.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      That does not undercut my argument. I am arguing against someone saying that "police show far more interest in Blacks, and police their neighborhoods far more thoroughly". While the exact opposite is true. I absolutely believe that the LAX attitude of police with respect to blacks is a huge detriment to the black communities. I believe that the LACK of police on black violence is absolutely a failing of the American justice system.

      Also, no one is giving police any credit. No one is asking you to trust the word of police here. We have undeniable statistics and physiological testing that proves the police's bias towards shooting whites. You do not have to trust the word of any police officers to know that black neighborhoods get less policing, and murders, etc, committed by blacks get investigated less and more blacks get away with crimes than whites (at least crimes with victims, so we can measure their occurrence).

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      And they are overwhelmingly racially biased against blacks

      How about a cite for that aspersion Sparky?

    20. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not undercut my argument.

      I said your argument undercuts your position. Note the difference. Your position is different from your argument. It's a subtle one, but quite important to take note of the distinction. You see, your argument is how you advance your ideas, while your position is where you are standing.

      I am arguing against someone saying that "police show far more interest in Blacks, and police their neighborhoods far more thoroughly".

      Yes, and you are arguing that the police avoid those areas. This is a bad thing, and not good for your position. All your argument means is that you are saying the police are failing black neighborhoods from another direction.

      Avoidance or Oppressiveness, whichever it is, it's still a failure.

      While the exact opposite is true. I absolutely believe that the LAX attitude of police with respect to blacks is a huge detriment to the black communities. I believe that the LACK of police on black violence is absolutely a failing of the American justice system.

      This is where I would recommend you say it as "the police's lax attitude of respect towards blacks" or even "a lack of respect in their attitude towards blacks" is a failing of the American justice system, and a detriment to their relationship with black communities.

      Also, no one is giving police any credit. No one is asking you to trust the word of police here.

      Tons of people are, actually. The new Attorney General just went on a song and dance about how we're supposed to treat them with more respect and consideration. The attitude where any criticism of police is treated as offensive is quite prevalent.

      Of course, even that aside, it's also a known fact that the police DO have to testify in court, which means, yes, their word becomes important. However, the examples I gave you, show that they do not live up to their duties. See, that's the thing about power and authority, you are trusted to use it, and the appearance of misuse is a problem.

      We have undeniable statistics and physiological testing that proves the police's bias towards shooting whites. You do not have to trust the word of any police officers to know that black neighborhoods get less policing, and murders, etc, committed by blacks get investigated less and more blacks get away with crimes than whites (at least crimes with victims, so we can measure their occurrence).

      Actually, we don't have statistics or physiological testing that proves anything. You haven't presented ANYTHING in the way of documentation.

      OTOH, here are three reports you obviously didn't read:

      https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/883366/download
      https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/925846/download
      https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-findings-two-civil-rights-investigations-ferguson-missouri

      Go ahead and read them.

      Take your time.

    21. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 2

      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -John F. Kennedy

      Unlike frogs many humans will eventually decide the water is too hot and do something to get out of it.

    22. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      "a lack of respect in their attitude towards blacks"

      While I think it is entirely arguable that this is true (and agree with it), it makes way too many assumptions. We know that police have a bias towards shooting whites, this is possibly because of a lack of respect towards black men, but I am only willing to state the undeniable facts not the motivations which we can only ever guess at.

      Everyone should be treated with respect and consideration, and a lack of respect and consideration towards police has helped to create the situation where we are now (opinion). If people respected police more, they would likely respect them more, and possibly start shooting more blacks bringing a stricter and more thorough policing to the ghettos (opinion). Part of the reason police stopped policing black neighborhoods was people started holding them accountable, with police brutality and calling them biased. But police are supposed to be brutal, police are going to kill people, they will kill innocent people, and they will abuse their power. But they need to be above the law to a certain respect to conduct their business. Look at what all these years of holding police accountable has done, they have simply moved out of black neighborhoods. While our white communities thrive, they are over policed, white people are shot left and right by police, they are forced to undergo stops and frisks all out of proportion to the crimes committed in the area, but we respect police and treat them with consideration, and we have a white murder rate comparable to the safest European countries. While black communities have crime statistics that look like Congo or Sudan.

      haven't presented ANYTHING in the way of documentation.

      What would be the point? You can google search as well as I can, the studies have been published far and wide and are all over the web. I am not stating that some random individual study that aligned with my biases was conducted. I am saying we have an entire field of research that has approached this problem from every angle and come to a consistent consensus. If you can find a single study that show conclusively that swapping a man's face to white will not make him more of a police target, then I would be surprised. And honestly, if I would sway you by cherry picking a study for you to read, I would not even count that as a victory. The only way to find truth is to search for yourself, everyone else will embed their own biases in their arguments.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    23. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people are "rioting" then nobody should care about the "reason" because they've already thrown away any basis for rational discussion. If destroying property and injuring/killing other people is their practice, then there is no purpose in "listening".

      If they had something reasonable and rational to discuss then they wouldn't be rioting, they'd be protesting peacefully.

      If the riot has got to the point when it's necessary to deploy a BOZENA then the rioters have already lost any right to any other response.

    24. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I think it is entirely arguable that this is true (and agree with it), it makes way too many assumptions.

      What assumptions would those be?

      We know that police have a bias towards shooting whites, this is possibly because of a lack of respect towards black men, but I am only willing to state the undeniable facts not the motivations which we can only ever guess at.

      Well, even if we count that as an assumption, it's only one, that wasn't a statement of motivation, it was a statement about the consequences of an actuality.

      Everyone should be treated with respect and consideration, and a lack of respect and consideration towards police has helped to create the situation where we are now (opinion).

      Everyone should be treated with respect and consideration, and a lack of respect and consideration from police, has helped to create the situation where we are now. Counter to your opinion.

      If people respected police more, they would likely respect them more, and possibly start shooting more blacks bringing a stricter and more thorough policing to the ghettos (opinion).

      That's speculation, and a weird seeking of outcomes at that.

      Part of the reason police stopped policing black neighborhoods was people started holding them accountable, with police brutality and calling them biased.

      And I thought you weren't going to speculate as to motivation. Now you break your own word? How can I trust you?

      But police are supposed to be brutal, police are going to kill people, they will kill innocent people, and they will abuse their power.

      Nope. Not in this country. Are you sure you wrote that correctly?

      But they need to be above the law to a certain respect to conduct their business.

      Oh you mean Qualified immunity? Perhaps, but even that is arguable, however it is certainly not to your articulation.

      Look at what all these years of holding police accountable has done, they have simply moved out of black neighborhoods.

      Ok, so? We take this as true, then what?

      Of course, the argument that I would present to you is that the police are not being held accountable, that instead they are behaving in a counter-productive way. Otherwise, they would not be allowed to engage in even the practices which you allege they have done.

      While our white communities thrive, they are over policed, white people are shot left and right by police, they are forced to undergo stops and frisks all out of proportion to the crimes committed in the area, but we respect police and treat them with consideration, and we have a white murder rate comparable to the safest European countries. While black communities have crime statistics that look like Congo or Sudan.

      Stop and Frisk in NYC:

      In 2003, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 160,851 times. 140,442 were totally innocent (87 percent).
      77,704 were black (54 percent). 44,581 were Latino (31 percent). 17,623 were white (12 percent).
      In 2004, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 313,523 times. 278,933 were totally innocent (89 percent). 155,033 were black (55 percent). 89,937 were Latino (32 percent). 28,913 were white (10 percent). 152,196 were aged 14-24 (52 percent).
      In 2005, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 398,191 times. 352,348 were totally innocent (89 percent). 196,570 were black (54 percent). 115,088 were Latino (32 percent). 40,713 were white (11 percent).
      In 2006, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 506,491 times. 457,163 were totally innocent (90 percent). 267,468 were black (53 percent). 147,862 were Latino (29 percent). 53,500 were white (11 percent).
      In 2007, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 472,096 times. 410,936 were totally innocent (87 perce

    25. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you start deploying autonomous anti-personnel devices like MRAPS's and BOZENA, youve made citzens aware that not only do you not care about the current reason theyre rioting but you're willing to herd them like cattle instead of take the time to listen.

      Where exactly is it mentioned that this system is autonomous? The word doesn't come up once in the summary or the article, or on the product's web site. There is no mention of remote operation in any of the sources cited.

    26. Re: deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      This. Also, MRAPS are armored transports. To protect soldiers from being blowed up by improvised roadside explosives.

    27. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is a riot going on then by definition it isn't peaceful.

    28. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because black people are definitely not more likely to commit crimes or the highest murder to capita ratio race.
      Nope, even with a black mayor and black police chief in charge it's the evil white man targeting those innocent boys who dindu nuffin.

    29. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      We guarantee the right to protest, not riot. If a group is rioting, the crowd must disperse immediately. This glorified RV is not the right solution, the right solution is to send out the national guard with orders to shoot rioters/looters. If you don't respect the rule of law, I have no respect for you or your position or your life.

      The black lies matter cartel is directly responsible for the Dallas mass shooting that you reference and they are a bunch of lying race pimps who have been proven wrong at every turn and their only goal is to whip up emotion of the ignorant population they take advantage of (not the entire black population) for their own political advantage. Unfortunately, if you allow yourself to be ignorant and lied to, you expose yourself to this and further if you choose to riot and destroy others property, you should be harshly punished. If you fight with the police or disobey lawful orders, you may get shot. Stupidity and ignorance have consequences. The war on black men is waged by other black men (2245 blacks murdered by other blacks https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-t... ) not police http://www.dailywire.com/news/...

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    30. Re:deploy this, and you arent a state anymore. by fedos · · Score: 1

      police are far less likely to shoot a black man than a white man

      The racist moron has spoken.

  26. Re:I have no subject please stop asking for subjec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does not. but someone is obviously paying them to push anti-government or anti-establishment stories.

  27. Is it wrong that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first reaction to this, was laughing maniacally. Is that wrong of me?

    1. Re:Is it wrong that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. That's what most people do.

  28. Bum, Bac! Error! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a SLOVENIAN company, it's a SLOVAKIAN company! Talk differences of about 300 km, from Maribor to Bratislava. Slovenia is at Adriatic sea. Slovakia is land-locked and is much further up north-east.

    1. Re: Bum, Bac! Error! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untermensch is untermensch. If you're not a German-origin European you're not even human.

  29. Fire by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I bet fire would kill it.

    1. Re:Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plasma. You want something that shoots enough plasma to dice it on the fly. Get a Dutchess-9 nuclear battery, a mark 7 thermo annihilator tube, a bag of iron filings with an eductor on top, and a Sidewinder turbine fan...

  30. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that help you get away with it? Agents provoked a riot at the G20 summit in Toronto a while back, and got caught. The other rioters were still charged for their own crimes.

  31. Where is force there is opposite counterforce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ukrainian Maidan participant and ATO veteran here. From my experience I say that any such vehicle can easily be destroyed by RPG hit or any other anti-tank weapon. Appears that Yanukovich was not only government leader that is readying weapons to use against people. All governments worldwide are similar, disconnected from needs of the population.

  32. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by sudon't · · Score: 1

    What good do the protests even do, anyhow?

    Actually, protest and mass demonstration are the only way change is accomplished in the US. At least, change that benefits the people. Voting, up until very very recently, has almost always been meaningless, since the two choices were provided to us by the two parties.

    But never mind all that. What I want to know is, when will this vehicle be available for purchase in GTA?

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  33. now everyone can be... by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    now everyone can be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  34. Terrifiying to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrifying to the anti-democratic, Black Bloc and other anti-Trump rioters and purveyors of violence in Berkley and elsewhere who can clearly imagine themselves facing real consequences for violently attacking, beating and silencing anyone they disagree with.

    The rest of us call that "protecting the rights of EVERYONE".

  35. The thing is a joke by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Anyone at the wheels of a Cat 966 would totally crush it. That "dozer blade" is a joke. And real bullets will just bounce off the loader's bucket. It's also extremely vulnerable to side and rear attacks. And the cat has far more maneuverability.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  36. Re:Cat by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like you'll be the one fucking yourself.

  37. that machine rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Needs to be two or three of those at every BLM protest which have a great track record of ending with violence.

    1. Re:that machine rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      We need quite a few of these for when Trump gets convicted of treason and all those old white heavily armed Trumpers can't accept that their Jesus Daddy really broke the law.

    2. Re:that machine rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will Trump be convicted of Treason? You do understand that the charge of treason is constitutionally defined and Trump himself has the ability to designate who the enemy is and isn't- right?

      I don't like what they are doing does not equal Treason. I don't like his politics does not equal treason. Same goes with but he is black or Hispanic or whatever outside of the constitutionally defined parameters.

    3. Re:that machine rules by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true Stalinist. Protip: You're not any different than the stereotype described.

    4. Re:that machine rules by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "How will Charles be convicted of Treason? You do understand that the charge of treason is constitutionally defined and Charles himself has the ability to designate who the enemy is and isn't- right?"
      --
      Someone in England, January 1649.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:that machine rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a dumbass double-agent for Dear Leader Putin won't go over well. You don't have to call it treason if you don't want to.

    6. Re: that machine rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous idiot is better designation for one spewing hate & emotion devoid of facts.
      If the Demonrat Party had solid evidence of treason by any honest elected official, he would immediately indicted, not just tried in Court of CNN.

    7. Re:that machine rules by syntotic · · Score: 1

      I had exactly the same idea years ago, without taking that much into design. A portable wall? Sounds like against the wall... To me it indicates schizophrenics are ripe and prone to amass on the slightest synchronized signal, though it is only natural that we find ways to handle big Human herds, a few have passed through places I ve been in and it is not just a party but ready to go wild. Would you stop at the vehicle and act funny? I do not think so...

  38. RPG will take that out in a heartbeat. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    The police wants to escalate to that level, Then the Unrest will also.

    Cops with full battle armor are a danger to society, it means the ones that think they need to defend themselves from the police will up their game to a 308 high power hunting rifle that will rip through Military armor like butter, or start using Armor piercing 5.56/7.62 home made rounds.

    Want to keep a crowd calm, you don't freaking roll in like storm troopers hell bent on extermination.

    In he countries it's built in, RPG's are not hard to come by, hell even a home made IED would take that thing out.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  39. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need these in America, to keep those rowdy n!ggers in line.

  40. good grief by Rurouni_Jaden · · Score: 2

    If we are going to get dragged into Shadowrun, can we at least get the cool stuff like elves and magic to go with it?

  41. The Fallen by Spazmania · · Score: 2

    Just looking at this, if someone falls in front of it, it'll run them over. That may fly in Slovakia but in the U.S. it would get the police department sued within an inch of their existence.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:The Fallen by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      but in the U.S. it would get the police department sued within an inch of their existence.

      Was that meant to be sarcastic? Because it you were serious, you have not been reading the news.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re: The Fallen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that bubble you're living in must be pretty amazing, where can I get one?

    3. Re:The Fallen by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you kidding? The police in the US regularly get their jollies gunning down unarmed citizens... not just adults mind you, but children as well; and the only "punishment" they receive is paid vacation (administrative leave) and *maybe* some negative media attention. Anything they can plausibly spin as an accident of any kind won't even be noticed.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    4. Re:The Fallen by youngone · · Score: 1
      They're going to need these, the story above is "US Workers Face A Higher Risk Of Being Replaced By Robots".

      Do enough of that replacing workers with robots and you'll need to buy some of these.

      Or you could make some robot police. That would work too.

    5. Re:The Fallen by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      They would be sued for certain. But the Govt would pick up the tab, and business would go on as usual.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    6. Re:The Fallen by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      They would be sued for certain. But the Govt would pick up the tab, and business would go on as usual.

      Officers inevitably get fired, and increasingly nobody wants to take their place.

      https://www.abqjournal.com/783...

      And why would they? There seems to be an expectation these days that no matter how much a citizen harasses an officer, the officer shouldn't ever respond in a way that a typical person likely would respond. Thus, it would make sense that a typical person wouldn't want to become a police officer.

    7. Re:The Fallen by nazsco · · Score: 3

      good.

      if you think people in the position of enforcing law with force should be allowed to lose temper like any other drunk defending their supposed honor, i hope you are the very first to experience it.

    8. Re:The Fallen by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Those manning that machine will get full battle dress and no useful identification combined with being part of a black force nobody will know of - like Area 51.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:The Fallen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to Slovakia? I have. It's a nice place with mostly good people. I'm going to tell you right now, nothing like that would fly there. I can also guarantee that Slovak police don't beat people up without legitimate justification like American police do.

      I'm going to hazard a guess that you have never left the USA. That's what fuels your America-centric worldview where there is the USA and the entire surrounding world is a savage wasteland. Newsflash: Many other areas in the world are better than your country.

      Grow up, ignorant troll.

    10. Re:The Fallen by Maritz · · Score: 1

      If it's your job to act professionally and within the remit of the law, then fucking do so. Otherwise, go and do something else.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    11. Re:The Fallen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, that has happened in the past. The Police misbehaved and then got sued/fined/arrested.

      It never happened in the u.s., but it may have happened somewhere else.

      These are tools of oppression. There has NEVER been an event which justifies using such a device against We The People.

      This would be perfect to take out large meetings of politicians, congress, and all the illigitimate 3-letter agencies.

      This device would also be perfect for scraping d.c. off the map, like the pile of shit it is.

    12. Re:The Fallen by MercTech · · Score: 2

      A vehicle mounted water cannon for non lethal riot suppression with an integral bullet shield to protect law enforcement officers and a flex seal at the bottom of the shield so that anyone on the ground cannot be carried under the vehicle..... only a total idiot would call this a "kiildozer: as it is visually obvious that this was designed from the beginning to be a non-lethal solution to major civil disturbance while protecting law enforcement.

      Don't bait the clueless; they tend to throw tantrums and throw things and break ATM machines and store windows.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    13. Re:The Fallen by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's fine with me, just don't complain when you don't get a timely response to incidents (or even no response at all) when your local precinct is undermanned.

      And while we're at it, keep in mind that most of the time when the police are called, somebody is being belligerent, so as an officer you're inevitably going to develop the cynical mentality that the typical person is up to no good.

    14. Re:The Fallen by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      And that's exactly what's happening: All of the qualified people are doing something else. And as I mentioned to another poster, don't complain about a lack of timely responses to incidents if your local precinct is undermanned because you're holding officers to a standard that basically nobody can meet.

      The only places where this isn't a problem is where the local populace aren't a bunch of assholes. Fortunately I live in a place with a low asshole population, so I don't have this problem, likewise I don't particularly care one way or another; I'm just telling it like it is.

    15. Re:The Fallen by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      You did read in the article where it mentioned that the machine was made and sold in Slovakia, did you not?

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  42. Far out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that most protestors are progtards, jigaboos and illegals, it's a shame this gadget wasn't invented years ago. At this point a Tiananmen Square moment would be most welcome.

  43. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You seem to be confusing protests and riots. Protests are one of the last legal acts (before riots, sit ins, work stoppages, etc) for a populace to resort to when a government doesn't listen to its people. Governments tend to like to turn them into riots by illegally trying to break them up (see kettling, escalation, mass arrests, agent provocateurs, etc) in an attempt to discourage dissent. They do of course naturally turn into riots as well, but usually only when things have gotten really bad (poverty, oppression, corruption, etc).

  44. Something people forget... by Jiro · · Score: 1

    You're not actually allowed to riot. Rioting isn't some god-given right, where taking it away is a form of oppression. Rioting is a crime, and it's a crime because it hurts people. A machine that makes it harder to get away with rioting is a good thing, in the same way that having a bank that can't be robbed would be a good thing, no matter how frustrated it makes potential bank robbers feel.

    1. Re:Something people forget... by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Sure, but SOP for a peaceful protest becomes: send in a couple guys to do violent shit in the middle of the crowd, call it a riot, and bring out the killdozer. Freedom of assembly absolutely is a right in many counties.

  45. I think ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... Israel has some prior art in this area.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  46. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes......, because there is noooo evidence that it occurs

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/nyregion/new-york-settles-suit-over-arrests-of-occupy-wall-street-protesters.html?_r=0
    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/after-a-police-dog-bit-his-leg-this-protester-was-jailed-thanks-to-a-cops-testilying

    There's another case I think that illustrates the point more clearly but I can't find a link to it at the moment. Protestors were congregated around a courthouse (I believe), police told them they needed to move to the sidewalk, so they did. Around an hour later a large number of officers rolled in and arrested everyone claiming they had "failed to obey a lawful order". Video later showed the truth and officials dismissed it as a "miscommunication".

  47. Requires Flash Player to see photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only does the Slovakia-based Bozena sell this monstrosity, they require that you install the Adobe Flashplayer to see photos of it. Beware.

  48. Resembles that truck from Soylent Green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Soylent Green is People"...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green

  49. this is genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buldozer blade and water jet would let kill protestors and then clean areas of corpses , wash blood and gore away in one pass.

  50. You started it by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Just because someone was elected that some people i the population didn't like, there was widespread rioting and looting across multiple cities.

    If people are so willing to damage everything (and other people) over political differences, what can you expect if something really serious happens?

    The building like these is in response to actions of the people, who have shown even if you treat people as if they had value they will not repay you in kind. So sadly this kind of response is more than warranted, and will not do anything to cause them to fight they would not be doing already.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You started it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone was elected that some people i the population didn't like, there was widespread rioting and looting across multiple cities.

      Funny how the same thing happened a few years earlier, and there wasn't widespread rioting and looting then.

    2. Re: You started it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's calls for violent revolution against Obama are documented.
      He lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election. We should have a revolution in this country!

      â" Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

      The phoney electoral college made a laughing stock out of our nation. The loser one!

      â" Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

      We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!

      â" Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

      Lets fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! The world is laughing at us.

      â" Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

      Too bad he is a liar and a failure, huh?

    3. Re: You started it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone was elected that some people i the population didn't like, there was widespread rioting and looting across multiple cities.

      Nope. Hardly any rioting or looting occured, and actually, people had other reasons for their protests than mere dislike.

      Trump's just pushing that lie so he can act like his hero, Putin.

      If people are so willing to damage everything (and other people) over political differences, what can you expect if something really serious happens?

      Like a sports riot? Oh wait, the police manufactured the events at Hillsborough.

    4. Re: You started it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that Obama won both the electoral college AND the popular vote, despite Trump 's fevered claims otherwise.
      So not only can you hang Trump on his own words, he's also wrong on the base facts, as usual.

  51. This is why voting is so important! by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    It's not what the nominee is promising you, it's what his or her voting record, friends, and previous actions consists of.. Have they made ill choices while voting, doing business? If never in office you better find out who they are! Research!! You vote for the better person. Hopefully, one who cares about all the fate of the people they Serve. Not the kind who serve themselves to money -- Only a Mad Man would put a Murderous Device like this on the street.. And while were on that subject, how are they Immune to prosecution if they kill people?? What? No one is responsible anymore? ..Rubber bullets blind, maim, and kill people too with this "human hamburger maker"!

  52. Oh yeah by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Your pals at Bozena have an all-new RIOT system, a crowd-control killdozer for all your protest-suppressing needs!"

    Good thing it's impervious to IEDs....oh, wait....

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  53. Bitch-call a progressive mob ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lay them out infrontof that sucker and POPBANGWOWSER ya got game ... hehehe. And if they're old farts bitche ... like Pelosi, pinkBERNIE, Warren, Obama.nation, Pritzker, Lynch, Soros, Page , Shumer they won't even get on their feet to snack an Alprazolam before action starts !!! Crunch/munch/lunch/

  54. METAL...GEAR? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    A weapon to surpass metal gear!?

  55. Re:No Use by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Yeah.. it's not like they hide their ideological bias much.. Look at the story's url.

    https://boingboing.net/2017/03/25/late-stage-capitalism-3.html

    'late-stage-capitalism-3.html'

    Seriously?

  56. Dumbocrap riot control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what the Dr. ordered for controlling all those tolerant lovable leftwing Bolsheviks!

  57. Re: All the more reason to avoid protests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, tell that to OWS, destroyed by order of His Imperial Highness, Der Fuehrer Obama.

  58. Killdozer? I think not. by mukinrestak · · Score: 1

    Calling this thing a killdozer profanes the name of our lord Killdozer, and Marvin Heenmeyer his prophet

  59. Not invulnerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not invulnerable to things like this and this.

  60. people never learn by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    looks like Maginot Line - people will never learn....

  61. I am ready for New Detroit by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    All hail Robocop!

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  62. Re:Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you tried looking in the /bin? Cats love to sleep in bins.

    $ which cat
    /bin/cat
    $

    See? There it is.

  63. CAn I buy one? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    It would be awesome for deploying in front of all those idiots that text and drive.

    1. Re:CAn I buy one? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      THIS! Like how GM made a consumer version of the Hum-Vee, sold great until pricey gas squashed them. Now that gas is cheap again, why not a consumer-version of this monster? Bulldozer and water-turret part of the Premium option package, along with the rifle rack (don't go huntin' without one). Can just smell the money. Feel safe and warm in the sketchy part of town when buying drugs. Park it in front of your neighbor with the Prius, just for laughs.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  64. Re:I have no subject please stop asking for subjec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been going on for 10 years but has been cut back a bit in the last year. I think it was becoming a little too obvious.

  65. Countermeasure - A Giant Doorstop! by littlewink · · Score: 1

    One of these but 100 times bigger.

    Or sling a barrel of gasoline and a torch over the top! The barrier even protects you from the flames (but not the driver).

  66. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    And it's a perfectly sound conclusion to reach if you're actually familiar with the protest scene. I call it a "scene" because that's exactly what it is. Just like you have ravers, goths, punks, emo kids, hippies, and whatnot, you have protesters. And it doesn't matter if he protest is to free Mumia, no blood for oil, food not bombs, or whatever Noam Chomsky's latest book is about; it's always the same people. That's because it's their social circle. The weekend's protest is where they go to hang out with their friends, to have fun, to see free concerts, to get dates, and so on. (Yes, when I first moved to San Francisco; I used to hang out with some of these people myself.)

    So yes, when a bunch of strangers show up, nobody knows who they are, and they start causing trouble; it's pretty damn obvious... if you've paid a whit of attention at the protests every weekend previously... that what you're dealing with there is not protestors, but that the cause of the week has touched the nerve of someone powerful and they sent in the agents provocateur.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  67. Make Room! Make Room by jddj · · Score: 1
  68. Funny... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    ... but I'm not too sure people in the US should be laughing at that. :P
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://reason.com/blog/2016/0...

    Not that I think police should be underequiped, inefficient, and with gear and vehicles in unuseable state like it happens here in Brazil, but I don't think MRAPs, tanks, and anti-explosive robots have a place in small counties and whatnot. xD
    In fact, here in Brazil we do have a few armored trucks for slum incursions and such, but you know... rare exceptions.

    1. Re: Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they get a new brand of tear gas that accidentally sterilizes people it is used on. Deployed only in areas with excess pigment or trailers, at least in the beginning.

  69. Could have used these for the BLM "protests" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to see all those white cucks setting garbage cans on fire meet the Killdozer.

  70. Re: Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your cat are belong to us.

  71. Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to give black people room to air their grievances by burning and looting their neighborhoods, this notion that we need to 'police' them is offensive. Don't you realize they were slaves 152 years ago?

  72. Um... so what? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    what do the ruling class, who are ordering all this, care about a few dead cops? That guy with the sniper rifle accomplished less than nothing. He's put the police on edge and given credit to the notion that blacks are dangerous thugs. He'll be used by the right wing pro-corporate press to push their agenda for decades to come. Meanwhile the folks that set up the system he wanted to bring down are safe and snug in their compounds with private security carrying military grade weapons.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  73. Just imagine the panic by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 1

    If you're protesting and you see that thing coming your way with other protesters pressing from behind.

    Which fuckwit came up with this vehicle? Someone who either doesn't care about or understand human group psychology.

    --
    The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
  74. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Limpet. Mine.

  75. Tianamen Square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look ma, we've imported Tianamen Square!

  76. Communication with rioters through the loudspeaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Will Be Annihilated In 20 Seconds!

  77. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Getting away with it? You can bet any amount of money that immediately after someone as much as thinks about starting a riot, police is there to round up everyone. It's almost like they wait for the police to be good to go before hurling the first stone.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  78. Re:All the more reason to avoid protests... by Maritz · · Score: 1

    In the case of Parks, definitely and idiot,

    You, on the other hand, sound really smart.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  79. Perhaps... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we can CrowdFund to get one of these for the protesters!
    I reserve my right to protest - peacefully, of course - until we are oppressed!

    If I am raising very legitimate concerns in a peaceful protest, and you come at me with one of these things, I am gonna go get mine!
    There's 'good' cops and 'bad' cops, of course. As we all know, 'bad' cops make life for us, AND the 'good' cops, tough!
    Problem is when 'bad' cops get one of these and start the escalation.

    Better idea: Spend the monies on ensuring all cops come to work in a good, happy mood. Perhaps ensure that each has at least 2 fully satisfying orgasms every day, one must be within 3 hours of the next shift.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.