Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Launches Neuralink To Connect Brains With Computers (businessinsider.com)

At Recode's conference last year, Elon Musk said he would love to see someone do something about linking human brains with computers. With no other human being volunteering, Mr. Musk -- who founded PayPal and OpenAI, thought of Hyperloop, is working on a boring company, and runs SpaceX, TeslaX, SolarCity -- is now working on it. From a report on WSJ: Internal sources tell the WSJ that the company, called Neuralink, is developing "neural lace" technology that would allow people to communicate directly with machines without going through a physical interface. Neural lace involves implanting electrodes in the brain so people could upload or download their thoughts to or from a computer, according to the WSJ report. The product could allow humans to achieve higher levels of cognitive function. From WSJ's report (paywalled): The founder and chief executive of Tesla and Space Exploration Technologies Corp.has launched another company called Neuralink Corp., according to people familiar with the matter. Neuralink is pursuing what Mr. Musk calls "neural lace" technology, implanting tiny brain electrodes that may one day upload and download thoughts. Mr. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Max Hodak, who said he is a "member of the founding team," confirmed the company's existence and Mr. Musk's involvement.

120 comments

  1. but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems like it would just amplify the bullshit drivel already in society

  2. First Experiment by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    Find out how many times you can ghost dub an augmented cyberbrain before the owner becomes catatonic.

  3. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elon Musk is nothing but a front for DARPA, just like Amazon, Google, et all

    Elon Musk personally has not invented SHIT. never forget this

    1. Re:Bullshit by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      DARPA is actually a giant idea vacuum, sucking concepts out of Musk and every other wide eyed visionary tempted by the chance of a research grant.

    2. Re:Bullshit by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Relevance? So what?

    3. Re:Bullshit by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      You're saying that Musk needs a grant to do something like this? Or, are you saying that nobody would ever need a grant? I'm picking up a pretty strong attitude in this post but either the reasoning or the communication is so murky that I can't make heads or tails of it.

    4. Re:Bullshit by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm saying that DARPA is more shadow than substance, they take ideas from people like Musk (who publishes them willingly in press releases) as well as people like academics seeking grant money. They repackage the ideas that interest them, then float them back on the market fishing for people who will write deeper proposals along those lines. For every 10 proposals directly targeted at DARPA RFPs, delivered by people with legitimate ability to deliver, DARPA might fund one - and I think they do it as often to stimulate further thinking in the field (incentivising those who did not get the grant) as they expect actual genuine progress out of their regular cadre of grant recipients.

      DARPA is not a giant skunkworks of advanced research prototypes that have cartoon-like powers, it's a bunch of paper-pushers seeking other peoples' ideas, rarely developing them beyond tiny pilot programs. Like the corporate world, they'll get one solid hit every rare interval, but most of the time it's just a finger on the pulse of what's percolating at the edge of tech development.

    5. Re: Bullshit by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      Inventing=thinking; implementing=doing

      Think about that for a bit - if your limited resources allow it - but either way, fuck off.

    6. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saying that DARPA is more shadow than substance

      That is a curious thing to say on the internet.

    7. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk didn't come up with the BMI, he didn't come up with planting electrodes in the brain, all he really came up with is calling it a nerual lace. Musk is just as big a blow hard profiting off other peoples ideas as DARPA is. I'm getting so sick of musk PR, he is building a bigger reality distortion field than jobs did.

    8. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk didn't come up with the BMI, he didn't come up with planting electrodes in the brain, all he really came up with is calling it a nerual lace.

      He didn't come up with calling it a "neural lace". That's from Iain M. Banks' "Culture" novels. http://theculture.wikia.com/wiki/Neural_lace

      Musk is already known to be a fan of Banks' work, because he named his autonomous drone ships after starship AIs in the Culture universe.

  4. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You act like there's something wrong with bullshit drivel.

  5. Actual article by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Original article: https://www.wsj.com/articles/e... (WSJ paywall)

    Other coverage: http://www.businessinsider.com...

  6. I saw this on an episode of black mirror once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Worked great for the user

  7. cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so the ship to Mars will be like a Borg cube?

    1. Re:cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guild heighliner.

  8. Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We can't even secure our non-brain-connected computers, devices, vehicles, etc, from outside intrusion, why in the world would I want to open the door for someone to hack my brain through a computer? Thanks, but no thanks. I'll leave my brain standalone and air-gapped from computers and the internet. The last thing anyone needs is some script-kiddie deciding to brick someone's head for the lulz. Also this would potentially redefine what a 'botnet' is. Nope, nope, nope.

    1. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You wouldn't get your brain hacked, that's silly. It would just be a better version of the currently existing human interface (keyboard input, VGA output).

      If your desktop gets hacked, you don't worry about someone hacking your fingers or eyeballs, do you? Well with this brain interface if your computer gets hacked, the worst thing would happen is that the hacker would beam annoying images directly to your brain (instead of displaying it on your VGA monitor) and maybe fuck around with your keyboard mappings so your brainwave commands to the computer don't work properly.

      Solution to a hacked PC would be to disconnect it from your brain electrode and de-hack your PC manually, or get another PC.

      Hopefully the connection from PC to your brain would be wireless, so a hacker can't actually zap your brain with electrical voltage. But even if it's wired, you could put a good mechanical fuse or circuit breaker in between the PC and your brain so only tolerable voltages are ever transmitted.

    2. Re: Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to secure if the implant only reads the brain and outputs, and doesn't write to the brain. Secure from having your brain bricked anyways.

    3. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by zlives · · Score: 1

      i wonder if this will enable Eula reading which may or may not reference the read only clause of brain.

    4. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and maybe fuck around with your keyboard mappings so your brainwave commands to the computer don't work properly."

      OR, they may change your keyboard mappings to use an exploit, or maybe to update the firmware, and to issue commands that you do not intend which could have much more serious consequences.

    5. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem. We have a nice spot in the zoo all set up for you. Tourists come from all over the galaxy to see living remnants of our evolutionary ancestors.

    6. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1
      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our brains are already being hacked. Think "fake news", clickbait, etc.

      "Improving" the interface is only going to make that more effective. If the computer can trick our brain into being immersed within the computer's world, then the walls of reality, already pretty damn' thin, will start to disappear altogether.

    8. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Connecting a computer to your brain is not 'evolution' in any sense of the word. It's just more toys that we may or may not need.
      You want real evolution of man? How about our brains evolve to not need computers at all anymore? Maybe computers are just a crutch.

    9. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Sure, in this iteration of the idea. What about the next?

    10. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by flink · · Score: 2

      You wouldn't get your brain hacked, that's silly. It would just be a better version of the currently existing human interface (keyboard input, VGA output).

      There is evidence that the right kind of sensory input can damage, or at least rewire, your brain. Look up the McCollough Effect. I imagine that once we understood the visual cortex well enough to be injecting images directly into our optic nerve, we might be able to figure out more nefarious memetic hazards.

    11. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Well with this brain interface if your computer gets hacked, the worst thing would happen is that the hacker would beam annoying images directly to your brain

      Having goatse beamed directly into your brain is quite serious.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    12. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      We can't even secure our non-brain-connected computers, devices, vehicles, etc, from outside intrusion,

      Nobody is making you use those things. I use a smarterphone (aka a "dumbphone") with an uninteresting OS, my car has no wireless connectivity and both my desktop PC and router which run Linux have never been compromised.

      why in the world would I want to open the door for someone to hack my brain through a computer?

      At this point it's merely researching the possibility. Why do you think any medical-grade product made from this would be internet connected?

      I'll leave my brain standalone and air-gapped from computers

      If you live to see the resulting product, you may change your mind when everyone has perfect memory and significantly high cognition than you. You could easily be relegated to being only capable of menial labor like the mentally challenged.

      and the internet.

      Why do you have so much focus on it being internet connected?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by losfromla · · Score: 3

      You wouldn't get your brain hacked, that's silly. ...

      Well with this brain interface if your computer gets hacked, the worst thing would happen is that the hacker would beam annoying images directly to your brain (instead of displaying it on your VGA monitor) and maybe fuck around with your keyboard mappings so your brainwave commands to the computer don't work properly....

      Hopefully the connection from PC to your brain would be wireless, so a hacker can't actually zap your brain with electrical voltage. But even if it's wired, you could put a good mechanical fuse or circuit breaker in between the PC and your brain so only tolerable voltages are ever transmitted.

      So, someone could put images directly into my brain? You do realize that most of our thoughts are images? If someone can control the images in your mind, you are effectively under their control. Schizophrenics complain about the images, also the voices, they do dangerous violent things because of these influences. Not as benign and lulzy as you make it out to be.

      A brain zap could be used as reinforcement when planting commands and reinforcing ideas, it would not have to go beyond the tolerable level to have a reinforcing effect. Something like in "A Clockwork Orange", only all remote with electric zaps and pushed in images. Bad shit, definitely.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    14. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      "not need computers" and "be always connected to a portable micro computer implanted in our heads" are functionally the same thing.

    15. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, no way in fucking hell. They'd be feeding so many goddamn advertisements, they could get all sorts of passwords and anything they wanted from you. I'd rather go live in the Amazon rain forest if the whole on-the-grid world had to adopt some crazy ass shit like this.

    16. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People should read the novel Surface Detail before getting a neural lace. The most terrify torture imaginable becomes possible with a sufficiently connected neural lace.

    17. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future is going to prove you so completely wrong.

    18. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If my desktop gets hacked and they decide to change my wallpaper to goatse, yeah I do worry about my eyeballs getting hacked.

      You can't unsee some things.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re: Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're afraid of torture? Have you seen the contents of your kitchen?

    20. Re: Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your air gapped brain is maybe not as secure as you think. Many have been bricked or hijacked by intrusive ideas (like religion), that could have been integrated in a healthier manner by enhanced reasoning ability.

    21. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
      Okay.. you're missing the point.
      Which is better: Having a brain that doesn't need a electronic crutch installed in it
      or
      Having a brain that's as good (if not better) than a computer all by itself?

      I don't assume all technology makes us better. I'm seeing some of it as making us weaker, lazier, and dumber, and that's not going to be good for us in the long run.
      Also,

      be always connected to a portable micro computer implanted in our heads

      ..would more or less create the situation I outlined above: 3rd parties being able to hack our brains directly. Nope, no, and hell, no, in that order.

      We (as a species) need to do things that encourage improvements in our genome, not the opposite. Installing electronics in our skulls, having computers connected to our brains all the time, these things will not encourage positive evolutionary changes, they'll make us lazier and dumber.

    22. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Here's a trivial but functional example of what you're talking about: https://img.ifcdn.com/images/4...
      If your brain can't be hacked via sensory inputs, then why does this do anything at all?

    23. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what your mom said last night.
      She also complained about all the dirty underwear under your bed. Go clean your room, kid, it smells like crap.

    24. Re: Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      'Religion' is not a brain hack so much as it is evidence that our brains are still more-or-less the same as when we lived in caves and were hunter-gatherers. Human brains can't accept abstract concepts like infinity, and the Universe and so many things in it are too big and too old to comprehend.. and our brains want answers as to the nature of these things. So rather than go insane, it makes things up (like 'gods' and other imaginary, supernatural, magical things) to 'explain' it. That in and of itself isn't so bad, but then some people who have also realized the nature (and vulnerability) of our brains, leverage that into a system of control. There are 'systems of control' of this nature all over the planet. It's the biggest evolutionary hurdle the human race will have to overcome in order to become truly civilized.

      There is no 'healthy integration' of these 'ideas'. There is only enduring them as a major flaw in us, until such time as our poor brains grow up and don't need it anymore. With some luck we won't extinct ourselves before that happens.

      Posting this as an AC because I really don't feel like dealing with the 10,000 flame posts I'll get otherwise for daring to point out the elephant in the room.

    25. Re: Thanks, but no thanks. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      LOL, or, forgetting to click the check-box, and probably getting flamed anyway. xD

    26. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by perew · · Score: 1

      I imagine that once we understood the visual cortex well enough to be injecting images directly into our optic nerve, we might be able to figure out more nefarious memetic hazards.

      This would give new meaning to "Once seen, you can never unsee it."

    27. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      1) I think that there is no "us", some people are improved by tech and others are fucked by it.

      2) Humans can already be hacked by a 3rd party, it's called social engineering. If we gained telepahty or enhanced brains, then more remote forms of hacking would become possible as well. The more forms of input and output you can process, the more hacks will be available.

    28. Re:Thanks, but no thanks. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      If your desktop gets hacked, you don't worry about someone hacking your fingers or eyeballs, do you?

      You don't seem to have met many Breitbart readers.

  9. Can you say 20+ years out? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kudos for starting, but it's a long long road from reading electrical signals from implanted electrodes to:

    A) an implant that you would actually want to live with in normal life (relatively free of complications, side effects, long life, replaceable when it malfunctions, etc.)

    B) a quality of communication that exceeds simple demonstration of concept low bandwidth gimmicks

    These types of bio-electrical neural-computer interfaces are starting to bear fruit for the profoundly blind, deaf, and amputees - cases where they have nothing and anything is an infinite improvement. Moving from that (today's) stage to improvement over normal function will take decades of development, and investors who don't care for much resembling profits or ROI in the meantime. Patents they might file today will likely expire before the patented idea generates any profits.

    Again, kudos for starting, we've already got the Hollywood take on what this tech might do, and we can tell from our (currently crude) cellphone interfaces to the web what a small sliver of the potential could be. It will be awesome when it gets here - but I might require major advances in life extension if I'm going to see it get "better than normal."

    1. Re:Can you say 20+ years out? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      You do realize this is bullshit. Total snake oil. It is not the same as a prosthetic device.

      So please just fuck off and let real people do real science without all this bullshit.

    2. Re:Can you say 20+ years out? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A "lace" brain-machine interface is just a bunch of electrical potential pickups, with all the same drawbacks as any other implanted electrode. Real science isn't bullshit, and it's not a cartoon-world either, bio-material interfaces are messy, problematic, and prone to all sorts of failures.

    3. Re:Can you say 20+ years out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you haven't noticed, but most of Musk's projects are decade+ endeavours. Mere mortals like you and I give up on any idea if we can't make it pay the rent in a couple of months. We're glorified fruit flies by comparison, and for the most part it's not worth the cost to hook our brains to anything. We'd just be sources of noise and spam.

    4. Re:Can you say 20+ years out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't assume this will be a mass market consumer product.

      Assume instead that the installation would cost $1 mil, and take significant preparation, feasibility and worthiness assessments.

      There are probably one thousand people alive whose brains would be worth hooking up.

      Then imagine the hookup's purpose is to train a neural net or AI system to think like the person being imaged. Thought processes of really smart people could be captured and reused even after they die. Maybe they could teach future generations. Maybe these AIs could help in other ways ... wouldn't it be great if government was an AI instead of corruptible imbeciles, even though the imaged people never had an interest in governing themselves?

      What if we had Musk's brain as an AI government, or Musk+xxx+xxx+xxx, and we'd vote for which AI modules to be loaded into this govt? Government after all is a largely rule-based system, devoid (one hopes) of sentiments, hidden agendas, or creativity.

  10. Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    April is a few days early this year.

  11. Just wait by magsol · · Score: 1

    for this thing to BSOD

    --
    "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
    1. Re:Just wait by losfromla · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing Bill Gates isn't running it, no BSOD problem as long as it isn't running windoze

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  12. Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope this isn't related to the boring company. :(

  13. Full report in Google Doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. Re:Full report in Google Doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this down. This document is empty, and its revision history can't be accessed.

  14. Will it come with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ono Sendai to Mitsubishi adapters?

  15. SIMULATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuf said

  16. Musk is a great demonstration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With over 2000 billionaires in the world now.. It's sad only one of them seems to be spending their money on interesting things... Actually involved and goal oriented.. Everyone else at that stage just seems to be obsessed with power and more money.

    I'm 40 now, I hope my expected retirement savings could buy a one way ticket to Mars.... Not bloody likely but if it was available, I'd do it just to see what could be built there for the remainder of my time.

    IMO humans should be focused on expansion out/throughout space. If there is a future for man, it is ultimately there. How car could we get if the trillion a year spent on military was on space and research.

    1. Re:Musk is a great demonstration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You think that man's future is living in the most inhospitable environment conceivable?

    2. Re:Musk is a great demonstration by zlives · · Score: 1

      i will sell you a one way ticket to where ever you want to go, just give me cash.
      (offer void where prohibited)

      also check out alaska, its still more habitable than mars and you get all the isolation you could want.

    3. Re:Musk is a great demonstration by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I guess you weren't there a few million years ago. Earth was the most inhospitable environment conceivable.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Musk is a great demonstration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      living in the most inhospitable environment conceivable?

      Human beings already live in New Jersey.

    5. Re:Musk is a great demonstration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many billions are used to spread a hateful form of Islam over the world by building mosques and paying hate preachers. Other billions are used to help third world women have their 8 children on average reach adulthood to speed up the overpopulation problems and famine so they can enjoy seeing compassionate people donating money to feed the hungry. Yet other billions are used to help economic immigrants, the people who where rescued form famine and child diseases, reach western countries to leech on their social welfare system. But lets not forget the many billions used to create one world without borders for the ultra rich and their capital so they can dodge taxes and increase their billions.
       
      So many billionaires do spend their money on interesting things, mainly on the destruction of the free Western democratic welfare states. They sponsor the growing polarization through immigration while using their own media to brainwash believers that importing more poverty will make them rich and 'good' and that all problems in the world are caused by the non believers in the ultra liberal world without borders. They even managed to turn some believers in haters of their own people, oikophobes who call everyone else racist. The ultimate goal is to bring down the sovereign governments in crushing financial depths (provided by the ultra rich) so they have to abandon the welfare state model with its retribution of wealth, so they do not even have to dodge taxes anymore and even put entire countries in depth for many generations.

  17. Isn't There Enough Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neural lace involves implanting electrodes in the brain so people could upload or download their thoughts to or from a computer

    Isn't there enough porn already?

    I mean, if you thought my Rule 34 fan fiction was bad, just wait until I can simply upload my thoughts.

  18. Self-contradictory by mark-t · · Score: 1

    "neural lace" technology that would allow people to communicate directly with machines without going through a physical interface

    And immediately afterward, they say:

    Neural lace involves implanting electrodes in the brain...

    So it's pretty clear that not only is there a physical interface, the electrodes, but this interface is pretty darn invasive because you have to have it implanted in your skull.

    1. Re:Self-contradictory by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      I suspect by physical interface they mean something you interact with physically, rather than directly - ie you push buttons with your fingers on a keyboard, you receive images via a monitor that converts them into photons, etc. It's awkward language, but I'm not sure there's a "correct" way beyond calling the brain link something awful like "really, really, direct."

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Self-contradictory by zlives · · Score: 1

      so your choice is to use a KB/mouse or get surgery for brain implants... yeah that sounds goodish

    3. Re:Self-contradictory by mark-t · · Score: 1

      My point is that that I'd rather have an artificial external interface than an artificial internal one

    4. Re:Self-contradictory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, the inside of my skull is right where my brain is....so....seems like invasive surgery comes with the territory.

  19. that damn cybernetic dolphin is a junky! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I need a Sino-logic 16, Sogo 7 Data Gloves, a GPL stealth module, one Burdine intelligent translator... Thompson iPhone.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:that damn cybernetic dolphin is a junky! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You forgot your Ono Sendai. I guess I might have 2 in my basement, if you need one.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  20. Brains are all over the place by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    with scatter-shot associative activations

    isn't it much better to just have the computer listen to what's on our mind after we've focussed it into a coherent intent or action-story.

    In other words, isn't it better to just have the computer listen to us speak, and sense our intentional motions. Yes, trackpad, touchpad, haptic glove I'm talking about you.

    If they're trying to say the computer could directly interact with the neocortex to provide additional associative memory capacity, I'm skeptical. The brain focuses stuff down and has specific I/O areas, and that's where you probably have to interact with it, to get manageable complexity.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  21. Well it is in one respect by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk is clearly easily bored.

    Starts cool things, but moves on to something else on a whim. Are investment analysts going to consider this a risk for his current main companies?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Well it is in one respect by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What would you want him to do? Risk everything on a single project and wait decades until completion/failure until he can start working on a new project?

      Last time I checked, humans did not have lifespans of a few hundred years.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Well it is in one respect by haruchai · · Score: 2

      Elon Musk is clearly easily bored.

      Starts cool things, but moves on to something else on a whim. Are investment analysts going to consider this a risk for his current main companies?

      That's quite the overstatement. He's been helming SpaceX and Tesla for nearly 15 years. He does seem to have a restless intellect but that doesn't make him flighty

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  22. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

    There is a MUCH bigger issue here than what someone might do with external computerized enhancements to the brain. Remember how just about everything is connected to the Internet? And how the Internet remembers everything? This means your thoughts will be recorded. And the Thought Police will arrive soon after....

  23. Bulwark Against AI by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Musk is very adverse to AI's doing these functions. Maybe neural laces will give humans enough of an advantage that they stop wanting strong AI.

    This might be the most important article you read this week: http://www.vanityfair.com/news...

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    Duh there's already an invention to stop that!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  25. Been done decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when that Ph.D. connected Apple computers to paraplegics so they could walk again? Was in the late 70's or early 1980's, if I remember correctly. At the time, the Apple was on a dolly that followed them.
    The guy who did it got his own lab at Wright State University and gave numerous talks. I remember discussing the technology of decoding the brain's signals back then. He said some Federal agency was VERY interested in decoding brain signals and gave him all the funding he wanted.

  26. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, but it isn't going to happen. Where this fool gets the money to waste on his bullshit is a real mystery. I've seen very few people that can fart through their mouths, he's elevated it to a bonafide artform. Now, THAT is exceptional. Whatever, yawn.

  27. Another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Breed people to be 2ft tall so everything lasts longer.

  28. Predicted in OMNI magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Lilly: Altered States Jan 1983 Omni Magazine:

    https://erowid.org/culture/characters/lilly_john/lilly_john_interview1.shtml

  29. On the other hand, by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    This is a good opportunity to loop the tape.

    Christopher Walken fans know what I'm talking about. ;-)

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    1. Re:On the other hand, by davesays · · Score: 1

      I *think* that scene was Cliff Robertson. Didn't see this until I had posted, but that kind of sacred the shit out of me...

    2. Re:On the other hand, by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      I *think* that scene was Cliff Robertson. Didn't see this until I had posted, but that kind of sacred the shit out of me...

      "Brainstorm" - with Christopher Walken.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  30. Are we there yet? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    NerveGear

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  31. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. It will arrive soon befo

  32. It looks like ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... a headphone jack. So I guess Apple won't support this.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  33. I see it. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk in the time-traveling Jack the Ripper from the future who fled backwards in time to us.
    Now he needs the technology to build his own time machine and does this step by step by 'inventing' the necessary parts.

    1. Re:I see it. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Elon Musk in the time-traveling Jack the Ripper from the future who fled backwards in time to us. Now he needs the technology to build his own time machine and does this step by step by 'inventing' the necessary parts.

      He already has one, but it's on Mars. A few trivial repairs, some power batteries, and interface method and his plans can come to completion.

  34. Re:Full article by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Nice report; for what grade?

  35. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    I'd be more worried about a hacker threatening to shut down my brain I don't transfer all my money to their account immediately. Or a bored teenager just shutting down people's brains for the fun of it.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  36. I went there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could Tony Stark I mean Elon Musk just admit the truth that an Iron Man style armored suit is his end game?

  37. Elon Musk is an alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read somewhere about a theory that Elon Musk is actually an alien stranded on Earth and he's trying to advance human civilization to the point where he can build a spaceship and return to his home. I'm beginning to believe it.

  38. I wonder if it's similar to by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    this project helping a woman locked in by ALS.

  39. I don't thing it's that simple by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Hooking up a bunch of electrodes is not that simple. You might have hundreds, maybe thousands of points to connect, just to start to get things going. (That is, if you could figure out where they are)..And even if you could map the neural pathways of a human brain. Are the paths all the same in each brain? General paths? Yes. Individual paths? I doubt it. Due to brain plasticity it would make things even harder. A brain is not a mass production motherboard.

  40. Brain Fungus by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    I remember a long time ago a person I used to know had an uncle who needed brain surgery. The surgery went fantastically well. But he died from brain fungus. You are at risk, any time you open the skull. I did a search on Google to see if they have solved the problem, but the results were very discouraging. One was quite unnerving! http://www.livescience.com/477...

  41. Privacy concerns anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have already indicated, I suspect its a lot easier to start a research division/company than creating, packaging, and supporting such a complex system, in mass production, for general consuption.

    I think it is cool, ambitious, and laudable. I just don't want to provide the user support. Nor do I envy the poor souls who will no doubt have to tease out all the legal implications of ownership and privacy of one's own thoughts. I can just hear the rationales now. "Your images are stored on our cloud, so we the company own those. Your blogs are stored there as well, and are similarly owned. Now your thought are stored there as well and so legally they are no different and are likewise owned by the company as well".

    Yes I think our troubles with privacy are just getting started.

    1. Re: Privacy concerns anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sorry mam, but you have voidedthe warrantee on you necklace by installing that open source patch to fix this known bug in our system. Unfortunately in doing so you have broken patent laws, preventing you from servicing said devices sold by the patent holder or their susidiaries. This communication is to notify you of the court motion being filed against you. If you'd like to settle out of court, please 'think' on this damages payment option at this time."

  42. Infections by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Some patient really need brain electrodes. For the others, it looks like a bad idea to introduce an alien substance that will increase the risk of microbes creating biofilms. As Wikipedia notes (with a reference): "60-70% of nosocomial or hospital acquired infections are associated with the implantation of a biomedical device"

  43. Not a good idea, yet... by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    There are serious technological and social problems that come with this.

    Firstly, security on one's brainwaves is critical. While current technology allows pretty coarse-grained analysis of brainwaves, that will change. When it does, those coarse-grained waveforms will be reanalyzed to delve deeper.

    Secondly, what protections exist for biometric data? In a world where the state is trying to *reduce* encryption, protection of biometric information (ESPECIALLY brainwaves) is critical. It doesn't get much more intimate than that.

    Thirdly, the social dimensions that come with such security is significant. As Europe pushes for the right to be forgotten, why can I not push for the "right to remember", even if that means recording everything I experience digitally? Technologically, we're chimps with calculators...We can barely handle the tech we have, but Musk wants to boldly push ever forward...I support him, but such a move has to be done carefully and deliberately.

  44. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by sheramil · · Score: 1

    You are assuming that your thoughts are worth recording. A lot of people seem to think that.

  45. I'm willing to pay $1000 USD by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    If Elon Musk volunteers to be the first to get that chip implant surgery. No? You don't want to have the surgery Elon? Oh well.

  46. Brains are a delicate thing... by davesays · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the movie "Brainstorm" (1983)? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00... It was about a direct way to record and replay experiences to and from the brain with sensory input and everything else as a real memory. There was a scene where the executive is replaying a scene of a romp with two hookers. it was clear the dopamine (or whatever) addled high had completely broken him. As a 16 year old with a mattress full of Playboys, my first thought was "That's scary, not really sure I want that." I am not particularly perceptive, but it scared me a little...

  47. Too much, too early?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the SGU 'knowledge chair', but in reverse. Actually, the Egyptians were probably doing this exact thing with the skull drilling and thought 'hey computers break, lets skip straight to brain mangling" :/

    The stress has obviously got to Elon. This is basically his way of saying "FML".

    He does actually make a good point that we are already cyborgs, in a way. But why not leave the cybernetics at the keyboard or non-intrusive garments. People want their own biological limbs, not Terminator grapplers. Granted, powered prosthetics are a decent hold-over till the right solution.

  48. Not to be rude... by no1nose · · Score: 1

    But why doesn't he focus on getting us all in electric cars that we can ALL afford? >$30k?

  49. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will transfer your money for you. You won't even mind.

  50. famous last words before machine starts own thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elon. Please. Don't.

  51. Priorities by stiebrs · · Score: 1

    And in not-so-far future we can expect a lot of sudden pornography, when user starts daydreaming

  52. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All human thoughts is worth recording, that is except yours and any other scumbags who think like you. Dealing with insulting people must be carried out in the same dark light as their own actions and thoughts.

  53. These technocrats must really think God is an idio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mankind already 'downloads' ideas. It's called "inspiration".

    However, one may be able to register "THAT" the brain is activated in certain places, but NOT the nature (name) of the thought that is being thought.

    It's called "mystery", because God chose before the world was to whom the highest abstract meaning, the 4th layer of spiritual wisdom, is being REVEALED.

    Something can only be REVEALED, IF it is already there, but veiled, unless the brain has been strained by continual higher abstract thinking so that new channels and connections have developed.

    For instance, nobody advances directly from addition and subtraction to calculus, or from learning the 26 letters of the alphabet to code writing.

    In humans, it must be INNATE, as the elect "has an ear" to understand that which can be found between, above and beyond the written texts of scripture that reveal the hidden emblematic clues as to how to attain eternal life.

    Technological processing speed and programming with that which is supposedly 'known' to humans do not lead to the crossing of the chasm that exists between ignorant hell and the all-encompassing big picture of wisdom.

  54. Yeah....no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like most of what Musk does, but it's only a matter of time (probably not enough time to make it out of the prototyping stage) before the government demands backdoors on par with Intel's ME technology. That isn't even accounting for the fact that an interface in the early stages will almost certainly just be a hack akin to "think of blueberries to type X, think of rain to type Y, etc" and that is bound to cause destructive patterns in the neural network (i.e. the brain is designed to mix discreet sets of signals together and it takes about 25 years to be trained to do that well, if you change where those signals are going it will try to restructure itself accordingly and you will almost certianly lose information in the process.)

  55. Just give all VC money to Alon Musk..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is the only person that seems to be doing any real innovation.

  56. Not even one GitS reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all the posts on this thread on slashdot...? Even when the Ghost in the shell movie is almost out?

    The nerdom really has changed a lot on /.

  57. make him watch Ghost in the Shell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make him watch Ghost in the Shell. Every single episode, movie, etc. See the proposed downsides, brain hacking, sensory hacking, false memories, copied and abused personalities, and all sorts of potential.

    Then start any sort of "company" working towards direct interface.

    bad enough that people externalize memory enough that "if its not on Google it doesn't exist", meaning simple deletion or lack of attention is enough for events and facts to simply "fall off" the search engine or go so far back in results that most will never check. Once memory is accessable and modifiable, the very opinions and attitudes of an individual can be controlled.

    And as we've seen, anything that CAN be controlled, IS controlled. And more often than not, the control is NOT from the owner or individual possessing or using the device or service.

  58. What is this?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With no other human being volunteering, Mr. Musk -- who founded PayPal and OpenAI, thought of Hyperloop, is working on a boring company, and runs SpaceX, TeslaX, SolarCity -- is now working on it.

  59. resistance is futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you know where the Borg come from.

  60. Re: but will anyone prove the riemann hypothesis w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read this. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565