Slashdot Mirror


More Than Ever, Employees Want a Say in How Their Companies Are Run (qz.com)

Two readers share a report: While workers have traditionally looked to unions to address their grievances, a new generation is trusting in the power of petitions to force changes. At the Wall Street Journal, 160 reporters and editors, delivered a letter to their managers protesting the lack of women and minorities running the organization, Business Insider reported yesterday. "Nearly all the people at high levels at the paper deciding what we cover and how are white men," the letter read. IBM employees are circulating an online petition objecting to the tone of CEO Ginni Rometty's letter to US president Donald Trump, and calling on her affirm what they call the company's progressive values. [...] Other employee petitions call for Oracle to oppose US president Donald Trump's second travel ban, and to let men who work at US regional supermarket Publix grow beards. Employee petitions are now so popular there's a website, coworker.org, devoted to hosting them. In some cases, the campaigns work: Starbuck's relaxed its rules about visible tattoos and unnatural hair color for baristas after thousands signed petitions asking for a change. Sometimes, they fail disastrously. Interns at one (unnamed) company described in a blog about being fired en masse after signing a petition asking for a more relaxed dress code.

124 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there are zero barriers for entry in the workforce today. this push for diversity for nothing other than the sake of diversity is pointless.

    the best person for the job regardless of race or gender is how it should be, nothing else.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:this is really getting tiring by silas_moeckel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But making false numbers games are how SJW's survive.

      As a business owner I would have a huge pushback on the force change bit if stuff this simple requires a petition your management is probably already dysfunctional.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:this is really getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let me take a wild stab here. You are an SJW, right? You're certainly racist and sexist enough.

    3. Re:this is really getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      - Different people from different viewpoints are almost invariably GOOD for an organization. Those that don't have diversity tend to wither and die due to stagnation.

      Proof?

    4. Re:this is really getting tiring by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      there are zero barriers for entry in the workforce today

      Just try to apply to my job without a masters or PhD in a relevant field. At best you will never hear from anyone again. At worst they'll bring you in for sport, and some of these people are just enough assholes to do it, if HR didn't get in the way.

      There are lots of barriers. The mistake is thinking management cares about what people think. Instead they should buy a share, group up, then start forcing votes at the shareholder level.

    5. Re:this is really getting tiring by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Having a company hire someone solely based on race is a terrible way to fight discrimination, in fact it is counterproductive because not you have many workers with resentment towards people who have been perceived to receive a 'free ride'. The only way to really tackle it is to look at the societal forces that prevent a person from being as tell trained or applicable for a job due to their background. I have no doubt that some companies turn away people based on race and this should be stopped. But if a company only has 1% of minority applications they shouldn't be expected to tip the scales. Once that happens it is too late. Sadly, I fear things are going the other way. Decent job opportunities seem to be fewer and far between for everyone, and this will only exacerbate the situation.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:this is really getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      - No we don't. History is history. It's dead. We abolished slavery 200 years ago. Quit blaming people alive today for what happened back then. They're not to blame. As far as today goes, sure, we have instances of discrimination, but they should be dealt with per-issue and not with some blanket institutional bigotry that actually imposes more discrimination than it fights. The very one sidedness of existing legislation is probably the best example of institutional bigotry in force today.

      - In that case there's no reason to argue for racial and sexual diversity since they have no basis on intellectual diversity.

    7. Re: this is really getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not rightist and centrists who keep bringing traits like race, gender, sexual preference, and so on into every situation and discussion. They aren't constantly pushing identity politics. It's the leftists who are doing that.

      Everybody but the leftists have moved on. The leftists draw their power from exploiting the differences between groups of people, however. So they need to continually foster disagreement and disruption. Leftists need this disunity in order for their failed belief systems to survive. They need to constantly create new 'victims' in order to exploit society.

    8. Re:this is really getting tiring by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is folks get outcomes confused with opportunity. Just because a certain gender or color isn't present in representative numbers in upper management and certain jobs doesn't mean they didn't have the opportunity to pursue that job. Equal Opportunity does not equate to Equal Outcomes, essentially.

      Amusingly, what these folks are advocating for is a lowering of the bar which only applies to certain genders or skin colors...which makes them, you guessed it, bigots.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    9. Re:this is really getting tiring by CaptainDork · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was a suit at Mobil Oil during its Dilbert years, and it was called, "empowerment."

      It died along with "Quality, Vision and Mission" statements.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    10. Re:this is really getting tiring by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Not so much this.

      I remember Texaco refinery hiring black women (a definite "twofer") back in 1975 and giving them fast-track promotions to supervisors.

      Texaco did this because federal contracts required it.

      It did serve a purpose, though.

      At first, white men were totally disgusted.

      Then, the white men found something else to be totally disgusted about.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    11. Re:this is really getting tiring by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      - We have historical (and current) discrimination to overcome.

      "historical" means approximately bupkis - no sane human is in the business of reparations, or of acting on induced guilt for things that they themselves have not done.

      "(and current)"? Must not be all that prevalent if it's in parentheses, now is it?

      - Different people from different viewpoints are almost invariably GOOD for an organization.

      Almost, but...

      • doing so doesn't require "diversity" as the SJW crowd defines it
      • having differing viewpoints just for the sake of having them can be just as detrimental as having a monoculture/bubble/echo-chamber
      • there is a huge difference between having different viewpoints to consider from, and giving all of those differing viewpoints equal influence and/or power in an organization (else you have 'paralysis by analysis')
      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    12. Re:this is really getting tiring by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure if we gave non whites enough other distractions "to be totally disgusted about", we could avoid having to respect their rights too. Doesn't make it right, however.

    13. Re:this is really getting tiring by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those that don't have diversity tend to wither and die due to stagnation.

      I"ve yet to see that ever.

      I suppose if the business is catering to a specific market where no one is a part of or knows that market it could be detrimental (all white guys trying to see black women gerry curl, or whatever it is called).

      On the other hand...throwing out or not hiring people due to their race and ONLY being interested in meeting quotas for diversity sake, I have seen tank a company's abilities.

      I have no problem with hiring whomever is the best for the job.

      Hell, why is it no one complains there aren't enough white jewish men playing in the NBA? I mean, you look at those teams....no diversity there, just a bunch of tall black guys, with the occasional token tall white boy in there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:this is really getting tiring by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      the best person for the job regardless of race or gender is how it should be, nothing else.

      I've been in the workforce long enough, including in interview panels, to know that raw merit is only half the game. Hiring and promotion decisions are largely social, especially when multiple candidates have similar merit credentials. Humans are social animals, and thus naturally biased.

    15. Re:this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no its really not short sighted. If we ever want to move forward, or progress if you will, we cannot keep hanging on to the historical discrimination as an excuse.

      I dont disagree that different people with different viewpoints are good, but the point remains that if they DONT have good points of view but are hired specifically to fill a quota, that is almost invariably BAD for the same company

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    16. Re:this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      ok...so get a masters or PHD? that isnt a barrier in the sense i was speaking here. that actually goes along with my "best person for the job" point

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    17. Re:this is really getting tiring by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Just try to apply to my job without a masters or PhD in a relevant field.

      Err....being qualified for a job is not considered part of overcoming a barrier to a job. Being qualified for a job is a GIVEN to even be considered for a job, geez.....please have some common sense.

      Barriers as discussed above are artificial things keeping folks out that are all qualified for the same job or activity.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:this is really getting tiring by clonehappy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If a group of people has been told by leftists their entire life that they can't get a job because of their skin color (or sexual preference/orientation, religion, whatever), they then develop a chip on their shoulder about their skin color, and are then unable to obtain a job because of their skin color.

      If those same groups of people would just stop listening to leftists, they could break the feedback loop and find success.

    19. Re:this is really getting tiring by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Barriers to entry are almost always used in the same breath as "requires high investment factor". Masters and PhD (or even B.S.) degrees all require a very significant investment. These degrees represent dubious qualifications. They are academic certifications, which may or may not have applicability in the corporate world. I'm not sure how many of my professors could hack it outside of academia, but not so many.

      And I disagree, very often those things are requirements that are not actual qualifications, just ways of shrinking the candidate pool. I interview people with those degrees who don't know what they're doing, and I know people without them I'd hire in a heartbeat (but cannot interview or hire because HR). The two best software people I've worked with had GEDs and learned their job in the Army of all places, but I can't hire them. Whatever dicking around they did as teenagers is well behind them, but they're barred.

      Diversity for the sake of diversity is just about as arbitrary of a barrier as academic degrees. While white people can't acquire black to get a job, in theory someone of another race can acquire a degree. However often people of other races have a hard time acquiring the money to make it over the barrier, it is as impossible for them as for me to become a black lesbian woman. If this were not true why are we acquiring so many people from India and China, when there are plenty of Americans who do not have jobs. Those countries do a much better job at providing the degrees needed to overcome these barriers.

    20. Re:this is really getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That IS simply an incredibly ignorant statement.

      If you step outside of the progressive bubble you will find many people of all types who say the same thing. There ARE zero barriers for anyone who has a shred of competence, self-confidence and determination.

      And last I checked, those three attributes, are not individually nor collectively a gender or a race.

    21. Re:this is really getting tiring by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "- We have historical (and current) discrimination to overcome."

      I absolutely refuse to pay for the sins of our fathers. This will only perpetuate an eternal victimhood. If you see wrong, fix it, but 'diversity' for its own sake is just racism.

      --
      Good-bye
    22. Re:this is really getting tiring by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Sure. We do engineering work. We hired a guy to head our HR's diversity department because regulations. What's he do? Nothing harmful at first, but then he gets it into his head that ethnic clubs at work are a good idea.

      Diversity with a big 'd' is an employment plan for idiots who can't find real work and have to make their living as parasites and rabble rousers. Believing it is anything other than that is foolish. No one needs ethnic clubs at their workplace.

    23. Re:this is really getting tiring by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      That's a prerequisite not a barrier. You're conflating the meaning in use.

    24. Re:this is really getting tiring by Oligonicella · · Score: 1, Troll

      However often people of other races have a hard time acquiring the money to make it over the barrier, it is as impossible for them as for me to become a black lesbian woman.

      Bullshit. You can just declare yourself as identifying as a black lesbian. In truth, minorities have an easier time acquiring funding than white candidates do.

    25. Re:this is really getting tiring by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Different people from different viewpoints are almost invariably GOOD for an organization" is fundamentally hard to test.

      It shouldn't be too hard, right? Especially now that companies are releasing diversity numbers. Get some diversity numbers for companies, figure out a way to measure their success, and slice the data different ways to see if you can find any correlation. Control for confounding factors. There are certainly difficulties, but this is basic data-science stuff, it's not fundamentally hard.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    26. Re:this is really getting tiring by Goragoth · · Score: 2

      Because who gets promoted to management is entirely based on merit, right? If you actually believe that then your naivete is staggering.

    27. Re:this is really getting tiring by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      Because who gets promoted to management is entirely based on merit, right?

      Sadly no. In my experience, who gets promoted to management has more to do with who you're friends with than actual ability.

      Please note that gender and race were not mentioned *once* in the above.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    28. Re:this is really getting tiring by swillden · · Score: 2

      Because who gets promoted to management is entirely based on merit, right?

      Sadly no. In my experience, who gets promoted to management has more to do with who you're friends with than actual ability.

      Please note that gender and race were not mentioned *once* in the above.

      But they're still there. What you've described constitutes deep and systematic racism and sexism that place serious obstacles in front of anyone who isn't the right race and gender. Just because no one is doing it "on purpose", that everyone has good intentions and thinks they're doing their best to be fair doesn't mean it isn't happening. It's the result of pervasive unconscious biases.

      So, how do you overcome those unconscious biases, break the stranglehold of the good old boys' network on management positions (or a thousand other similar structures)? How do you root out the unconscious biases and make the people who hold them see that they do? Remember, these are well-intentioned people who consider themselves to be kind, and fair... but they just tend to hang out with their own kind, so that's who they know, and who gets promoted.

      Serious question. What's your answer? Just letting the self-reinforcing system continue isn't a good one. So what do you do?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    29. Re:this is really getting tiring by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      You start your own company. Nothin' stopping you.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    30. Re:this is really getting tiring by russotto · · Score: 1

      Different people from different viewpoints are almost invariably GOOD for an organization. Those that don't have diversity tend to wither and die due to stagnation.

      If they believed that were so, organizations which tout "diversity" wouldn't be so intolerant of diverse viewpoints (c.f. Mozilla, Grubhub)

    31. Re:this is really getting tiring by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      You start your own company. Nothin' stopping you.

      Then [s]he could make sure to hire and promote the right genders and colors to ensure diversity.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    32. Re:this is really getting tiring by swillden · · Score: 1

      But they're still there. What you've described constitutes deep and systematic racism and sexism that place serious obstacles in front of anyone who isn't the right race and gender. Just because no one is doing it "on purpose", that everyone has good intentions and thinks they're doing their best to be fair doesn't mean it isn't happening. It's the result of pervasive unconscious biases.

      Prove it. Prove that's what's happening. You are making an extraordinary claim, you must justify it.

      You described it! If you still can't see it, I can't help you.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    33. Re:this is really getting tiring by swillden · · Score: 1

      You start your own company. Nothin' stopping you.

      Just sayin'.

      So, your answer is to ignore it. I see.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    34. Re:this is really getting tiring by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      No, all I said is it had more to do with who you're friends with.

      Unless you're suggesting that you can only be friends with people of the same gender and color as yourself. That may apply to you, but some of us aren't so...uh..."discerning"...when it comes to who our friends are.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    35. Re:this is really getting tiring by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      How about managements spawn. That will get you more places than anything else will. Hell, they will hire two at a time to fill those jobs, one the spawn gets paid to do nothing much what so ever and their 'assistant' that does the actual job and gets paid bugger all, only to be fired when they are blamed for the spawns fuck up.

      Petitions are as stupid as fuck, seriously, sign those and you screw over your career. To do that stuff you absolutely require the protection of Unions. Unhappy with company policies, secretly get it in writing, forward it to https://wikileaks.org/ and work on finding employment else where. Don't like bad management, catch them breaking the law and report them via https://wikileaks.org/ (whistle blowers are persona non grata in most corrupt democracies, especially the US, thanks, Uncle Tom Obama).

      Actually catching and implicating management in prosecutable crimes is a smart career move, if you don't get caught. It creates many vacancies at the top, corrupt management types will drag down those corrupt employees who assisted them ie Wells Fargo, lots of job opportunities created there ;). You could even just send the information anonymously to the applicable three letter agency, so not just FBI but also SEC and even the NSA (get a bunch fired for espionage or treason, alls fair in corrupt corporate politics). Working you way up the corporate ladder is a lot easier if you can knock a few off that ladder on the rungs above you, just make sure they don't drop in your on the way down ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    36. Re:this is really getting tiring by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What exactly is "refuse to assimilate"? Not eating the same foods? Not having the same religion? Not listening to the same music?

    37. Re:this is really getting tiring by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm guessing your last name isn't "Abdul" or "Hussein".

      Illegal discrimination is alive and well.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    38. Re: this is really getting tiring by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not rightist and centrists who keep bringing traits like race, gender, sexual preference, and so on into every situation and discussion. They aren't constantly pushing identity politics. It's the leftists who are doing that.

      That's only because the rightwingers and other assorted bigots are perfectly OK with the status quo, where brown people, non-straight people, women and people with middle-eastern sounding names are routinely rejected for jobs at much higher rates than straight white males.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    39. Re:this is really getting tiring by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how many of my professors could hack it outside of academia, but not so many

        The life of young academics is completely brutal. I used to be one. I left, bought a house and started a startup. Both of those are considered rather stressful. I did both at the same time and frankly it was a holiday compared to my academic staff job (assistant prof equivalent).

      In my field, there's a lot of cross overbetween academia and industry, and the academic jobs are much more work, much more stress and much less pay, pretty much uniformly.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    40. Re:this is really getting tiring by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, nothing that convoluted. AC can tell how integrated a job applicant is just by looking at their name. Praveen Singh has clearly not integrated. But if he changed his name to John Fontaine... now that is a well integrated citizen right there. Watch how he confidently holds everybody’s attention in the palm of his hand with his crisp American accent and charismatic style. I'm being sarcastic of course, but sadly there is plenty of evidence that employers suffer that kind of unconscious bias.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    41. Re:this is really getting tiring by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      - Different people from different viewpoints are almost invariably GOOD for an organization. Those that don't have diversity tend to wither and die due to stagnation.

      Really? Why don't you give us a single example. I'm making it easy for you: I know there are just thousands of such companies <eyeroll> so surely you can name just one. Right?

    42. Re:this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no, the answer is you dont get to tell others how to run their businesses.

      if you dont like it you start your own. Stop with the BS

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    43. Re:this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      that wasnt proof in the slightest way though. This is the problem with your way of thinking. you see a problem that doesnt exist, you have no solutions that arent in of themselves racist to fix the problem because forced diversity IS racism.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    44. Re:this is really getting tiring by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you are an AC, you dont have facts

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    45. Re:this is really getting tiring by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What's that have to do with job merit? Sure, English language proficiency matters in the office and I don't dispute that, but you seem to be talking about OTHER things beyond language.

      I haven't seen anything refuting my original point. I categorize English skills as a direct merit for the job. Music, food, history, sports, etc. should be moot to hiring decisions, but in practice it's not. Human habit is to hire people more like ones self.

    46. Re: this is really getting tiring by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it certainly couldn't be due to language/accent barriers, or low qualifications, or bad vibes from the interview process... no, no, no, they're all racists, sexists, and bigots who want to keep the minorities down. Sounds quite a bit like a crazy conspiracy theory, doesn't it?

      I am talking about people where those barriers do not exist, people who are second or even third generation citizens, people with the relevant education (achieved in this country!), with a good work ethic.

      The statistic don't lie. You are more likely to be turned down if your name is "ethnic sounding" and you're not white.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    47. Re: this is really getting tiring by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      So yes in fact, equality of opportunity SHOULD lead to equality of outcome.

      I normally don't respond to ACs, but I was hoping someone would bring this up.

      In any homogeneous population group, you'd be absolutely correct. The problem, then, is that we do not have a homogeneous population group, but where you attribute the discrepancy to discrimination, I feel you are dismissing the elephant in the room; biological differences between the groups.

      Do you think the NBA has a racism problem because whites represent 25% of the players? Where are the calls for diversity there?

      Answer that, and you start to understand why some of us think these calls to prioritize diversity over all less are ridiculous.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  2. Re:Translation by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

    We need to build a wall and keep all the females out until they can be throughly vetted. Over 50% of the poeple living in this country are female, did you know that? That's MILLIONS. We have to put a stop to this until we cn figre out WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON.

  3. Sure To Be Effective by tsqr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm convinced that these petitions will be at least as effective as the ones posted on whitehouse.gov.

    1. Re:Sure To Be Effective by skids · · Score: 1

      Eh, the real action is submitting comments at regulations.gov.

      e.g. https://www.regulations.gov/do...

  4. Re:Translation by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to be on the female side of the wall please. You know, so I can help figure out what's going on.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  5. Simple solution by Snufu · · Score: 2

    Just ask your union... Oh.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Even better - go work for a (relatively more) sane company. Let the dysfunctional companies get stuck with dysfunctional employees. Eventually they (the companies) die.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Simple solution by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      Do you realize what a crazy idea that is?

      First, that would take actual hard work, and money.

      Second, someone has already done the work for you, as they should, and started a company for you to have a say in.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    3. Re:Simple solution by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Do you realize what a crazy idea that is?

      "Why climb the corporate ladder when you can own it?" — Rich Dad, Poor Dad

  6. How cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The workers think they have an opinion that matters.

    The current American culture gives absolutely no shits what workers think, only that they show up and do what it says on the tin.

    You want to have an opinion? Fight for it. Walk out. Organize. Use the tools that are available to you, not spineless open letters that only provide the status quo with targets to aim at.

    And, btw, when you have that opinion, don't give it up. Remind everybody that you fought hard for the right to have a voice, as opposed to workers in the 70s, 80s, and 90s that happily gave up their ability to affect change.

    1. Re:How cute by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      The workers think they have an opinion that matters.

      The current American culture gives absolutely no shits what workers think, only that they show up and do what it says on the tin.

      You want to have an opinion? Fight for it. Walk out. Organize. Use the tools that are available to you, not spineless open letters that only provide the status quo with targets to aim at.

      And, btw, when you have that opinion, don't give it up. Remind everybody that you fought hard for the right to have a voice, as opposed to workers in the 70s, 80s, and 90s that happily gave up their ability to affect change.

      Oh my, how un-American! *snicker* Unions are against your "right to work", don't you remember? ;) Don't let the unions take away your right to work! America is a bizarre, twisted land. But American business leaders will tell you that democratic socialist (read: soshulism) countries in Europe that actually encourage both representation for the workers and the business to achieve compromise and balance are the road to fiery perdition even though the data from sources like the OECD paints the opposite picture. The data is a lie! :P

      --
      We'll make great pets
  7. Interns != Employees by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That intern was taught an invaluable business lesson.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Interns != Employees by chispito · · Score: 1

      That intern was taught an invaluable business lesson.

      Something something nail, hammer!

      If you don't like the culture where you work, and your suggestion box entries seem to disappear into the ether, then get a different job, explaining why you chose to leave. If that doesn't change the culture, then chances are you weren't valuable enough for them to care about your petition anyway.

      You could also try to work your way into management, such that you're entrusted with decisions that affect the area you want to change. But let's be honest--by that point you've probably come around to the company's point of view on most things.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  8. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Dress codes (outside of safety) have little to do with working hard and more to do with enforcing unnecessary conformity. As long as your clothing's sanitary and safe for the typical workday environment, I don't see a reason why it can't be worn to work. Employees undistracted by uncomfortable clothing are productive employees. Asking for this should got get one fired as it has nothing to do with workload.

    2. In mentioning 'white men' the letter's author exposes a racist viewpoint. Just because someone's white and male does not mean he is responsible for all suffering.

  9. Only if there was something by future+assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    say we used the word Union. It would be an organization of people from the same industry banded for the benefit of all workers. Maybe the workers could donate a little of their monthly income so the Union could hire lawyers and lobbying power. Its just an idea...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Only if there was something by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      ...and in 20 years when management decides to offshore *all* of its tech work to India (due to bloated contracts with said unions, bloated wages, and a systme where the incompetent could never get fired, let alone done so in a timely manner), we can all sit back and say we at least tried, right?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Only if there was something by chispito · · Score: 1

      say we used the word Union. It would be an organization of people from the same industry banded for the benefit of all workers. Maybe the workers could donate a little of their monthly income so the Union could hire lawyers and lobbying power. Its just an idea...

      These are not petitions for things unions care about, like benefits, pay, and work conditions. It is in a union's best interest to keep its members stably employed so that those union dues keep creeping higher. Diversifying the workforce has little to do with this.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:Only if there was something by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      ...and in 20 years when management decides to offshore *all* of its tech work to India (due to bloated contracts with said unions, bloated wages, and a systme where the incompetent could never get fired, let alone done so in a timely manner), we can all sit back and say we at least tried, right?

      After we get done with building the wall along the Mexican border, we're going to take all the knowledge and expertise we gained from that to create a gigantic dome around the United States to solve this problem.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:Only if there was something by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Unions only serve to protect the least amongst the employees. That's why they uniformly prevent crappy folk from getting fired for cause.

      Bullshit. Unions exist because at one point or another Management decided it would be more profitable to shit on their employees rather than treat them fairly.

      Companies that take care of their employees generally don't need to worry about unions.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
  10. What a bullshit level of entitlement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    First, I say this from the perspective of someone who has been an employee in a number of companies for nearly 50 years, not an employer!

    If employees want a say in how a company is run they should go out and start their own. It is the employer's right, within the relevant laws and regulations governing the business, to decide how the company is run. Put up or fuck off!

    1. Re:What a bullshit level of entitlement! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      not sure why this got modded down, its entirely accurate

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  11. Stock holding? by cyocum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not club together with your fellow employees to collectively purchase stock in the company that you work for? That way, you can force issues at the board level when management comes up for re-election.

    1. Re:Stock holding? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Why not club together with your fellow employees to collectively purchase stock in the company that you work for? That way, you can force issues at the board level when management comes up for re-election.

      As I mentioned elsewhere, Publix is employee-owned. Anybody not doing what you suggests doesn't understand ownership.

  12. Natural byproduct by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1

    You know how these big companies foster "local culture"? Because that's what makes us all "a family". So some people end up believing it and because they and others believe it they become a community, they become a family. isn't it normal for members of the community to have a say? -it can certainly be a win/win for both employee and employer. Some C level execs think "culture" is the BS to feed the peasants so they work harder for free...that's even true to an extent but when those peasants unite; those managers which are arrogant and do think of rank and file as peasants often end up being circumvented. Great employees have choices. Great companies need those employees. Often one without the other amounts to less. Wouldn't you want to be in a company that actually takes note of how you think things should run if there'sa chance that it's actually a better way?! There are few reasons to stay and give your best for a company that is all flash and no substance. (It's late and I'm on morphine so apologies if this turned into a random rant)

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Natural byproduct by swb · · Score: 1

      I've usually found that *most* companies hedge a lot on their culture propaganda, to the point it which it is usually meaningless drivel. The downside is that since it is content-free, nobody cares and they doesn't do anything for them or the peasants.

      When they put too much meaning into the culture propaganda, people tend to believe it and expect follow-through, which they seldom get because it's propaganda. This results in a poisoning of the well and a further loss of credibility.

    2. Re:Natural byproduct by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Actually, a culture forms whether or not management fosters one. Oftentimes, a culture will form that is decidedly counter to what management wants to foster.

      If management is a bunch of cut-throat snakes, the employees adapt and form their own counter-culture of sorts. The result only gets uglier over time, and management usually doesn't find out until the company is rapidly sinking (at which time many of them have either jumped ship or are about to).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re: Natural byproduct by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1

      Rings true. I've not considered that. Shame I cannot mod you up.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  13. worker co-operatives by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 2

    unions are good, worker co-operatives are better https://medium.com/@PrestoViva...

  14. Re:Translation by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    Your otherwise excellent policy proposal fails because it does not describe how to pay for the wall. Here's an idea: make the females pay for the wall. Oh, wait. They might be happy to do that. :-) Walls work two ways.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  15. Re:Translation by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're sorry, but North Carolina will have to see your birth certificate, please.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. Re:Translation by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Generalization aside, I was actually sort of with you on that until...

    They also think they're entitled to power even though they haven't worked hard enough to earn a management position.

    That should read "they haven't worked long and/or smart enough to earn a management position."

    Entrepreneurs who are successful enough to found their own self-sustaining company are exempt from this, naturally...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  17. Re:Translation by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Dress codes (outside of safety) have little to do with working hard and more to do with enforcing unnecessary conformity.

    They also promote the image the company wants to project publicly in many cases.

    I hate the dress codes too, but they can be there for a reason.

    I was at a place that started out having all men wear ties, women were dresses, or if in pants they had to be pretty formal looking.

    After a few years there, they relaxed the dress codes to much more casual when in the work place when not meeting or being seen by customers.

    But if we had to meet with customers or they were coming into our building, we had to go back to ties and formal looks those days.

    And hell, for the times it is for conformity, I'd think the snowflake generation would be used to wearing the "school uniform"...don't most public and private schools today require uniforms?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  18. Re:Translation by jimmifett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with your second point, but dress code, is important. I work completely differently in shorts and a tee than a button down shirt.

    A button down puts me in a completely different mindset and attitude. Having a co-worker in sandals and ripped shorts is distracting. When I go to a client or have a client come to me, I want myself and all my co-workers looking like professional bad-asses at work, not slackers. It's all perception.

    Long time ago, someone also told me to dress for the job I want, that's been somewhat successful.

    Appropriate clothing for the job being done is important.

  19. Re:Translation by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never seen a public school in the USA have a uniform for anything other than sports teams. Hell dress code has only gotten even laxer since I graduated in 2000.

    I don't know where in the US you are located, but where I live, pretty much all the public schools require uniforms, it was put in to keep the poor kids from feeling bad next to the better dressed wealthier kids.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  20. so, unionize, and get a contract by swschrad · · Score: 1

    then you get a chance at the table.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  21. Re:Translation by clonehappy · · Score: 1

    So true. In fact, if I were CEO of IBM, I'd make it publicly known that I literally used their petition as toilet paper and tell them to get back to fucking work. If you don't like your job, quit.

  22. Re:Translation by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    You deserve an unlimited number of mod points for this comment.

  23. Re:Not precisely correct by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    What we have is a new generation that:
    - believes they are ENTITLED to have what they want
    - has never been told "no" by their parents
    - believes that rock n' roll, sex and drugs can effect change

    FTFY

  24. Are they vested in the company? by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    Employees generally have the right to express a non-attack style opinion, on the job. Except for invaluable employees, managers, executives, or part owners, it makes no sense to give all employees a say in how a company is run. That's not not how business works. If I hire a worker, I welcome their opinions, But, unless they're hired to manage a specific area of my business, they can't hold the reins.

  25. Re:Translation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    And even the high executives shouldn't. The only thing a man in a suit and tie says to me is "I'm going to overcharge you by the cost of this suit"

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  26. Re:Translation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://dilbert.com/strip/2017-03-29

    You're missing the boat. The lazy slacker is the most efficient employee you can have. He'll find a way to get the job done in a quarter of the time and a tenth of the cost- just so he can goof off the rest of the day.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  27. Re:Typical millennial thinking by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The person in charge of you is your boss, and tells you what to do.

    Unless you're a contractor. Your boss can direct your work but they can't tell you what to do. Otherwise, you're an employee and the employer has deliberately misclassified you to commit tax fraud.

  28. Re:Translation by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    We'll make the women pay for the wall!

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  29. Re:Translation by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Dress codes (outside of safety) have little to do with working hard and more to do with enforcing unnecessary conformity.

    If you're an employee who deals with customers then suck it up. Your employer has every right to demand you dress appropriately, else you could be costing them business. Don't like it?...gtfo. Our office has a business casual dress code...don't come in wearing shorts or flip flops. If you want to be a slob, go somewhere else.

    I've also had occasion to ask HR to talk to a female employee about her exposing a bit too much...every day. I'm no Puritan, but sheesh, the office isn't a place to share your cleavage, or wear skirts that expose your panties.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  30. Re:Translation by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Let me translate. A bunch of whining millennial snowflakes want a say in getting out of working hard. They also think they're entitled to power even though they haven't worked hard enough to earn a management position. Millennial snowflakes are crybabies and don't deserve to be promoted.

    Hmmm...could be. On the other hand it occurs to me that people who own stock have a say in running the company. Why is that? I'm certain that they pay more for stock or take less compensation in order to get partial control. Why couldn't people who work for a company want partial control for similar reasons? They think that if they have control then their investments (in time, in "roots", whatever) are better represented. You seem to be saying that the only reason an employee would want control is to work less hard, but I recall the company before last that I worked for. Management decided that instead of being a hardware and software company that they wanted to be a software-only company. I thought that was particularly poorly thought out, but I had no control.

    By the way, you might want to get a narrower brush.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  31. Re:Translation by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    In America, about 20% of public schools require uniforms. This is an increase from around 12% in the 1999-2000 school year. Uniforms are more common in low income areas where classroom control and gangs are bigger problems.

  32. Re: Translation by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

    As for the uniforms, no, not that I'm aware of. At least not here in New Brunswick.

    Dresscodes shouldn't be super anal, but I wholly agree with dressing nicely when dealing with customers. Impressions go a long way, regardless of skill level. Combine both and you are set for life.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  33. Re:Translation by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    And even the high executives shouldn't.

    Neckties constrict blood flow to the brain. Taking an IQ test while wearing a tie lowers your score by an average of 3 points. Neckties make you stupid, at least while you are wearing them.

  34. Re:Translation by darkain · · Score: 1

    As far back as the 90's, uniforms existed in public education. In Washington State, I attended a public school for a year which required them. It was damn entertaining being sent home for wearing bluejeans one day!

  35. Re:Typical millennial thinking by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Takes two to dance that dance. Don't pretend that being a "contractor" doesn't have advantages for the one being the contractor. In my line of work, contractors don't get "company" benefits and are the first to go when business slows down, but unlike us "first class citizens" with 401k match and benefits, they get to charge by the hour whereas we are salaried.

  36. So by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    "Nearly all the people at high levels at the paper deciding what we cover and how are white men,"

    Nearly all. So not, in fact, all. So how many non whites is "enough"? Does it matter who we replace, so long as we're just replacing a white guy? And isn't that a little, oh, I dunno - racist? You can't scream racism when you propose a racist solution.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  37. Re:Translation by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is a cultural problem. A problem you've illustrated quite well. Why does a tie imply professionalism? Why not focus on how efficient your employees are and the accomplishments of your company instead of associating it with arbitrary fashion? This applies to your customers as well. I realize you're bowing to pragmatic reality, but fashion obsession is anything but professional (unless of course you work in the fashion biz).

  38. Re:Translation by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    By all means, if you work better in a shirt and tie, wear them. Someone who works better in shorts and T shirt should be able to wear that if he chooses (again barring safety concerns). You are making the typical mistake of projecting your mental state onto your others. Just because you need to dress the part and play-act it doesn't mean they need it too. Clothing shouldn't define the employee or the job, the skills possessed and the skills required should, respectively.

    Beyond specific safety concerns (eg a plastic suit for a clean room, or steel toed boots in a factory), clothing choice is entirely irrelevant and should be left to the employee's level of comfort. The fewer distractions at work the better.

  39. Re:Typical millennial thinking by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Where I am they treat contractors exactly the same as employees, except they get a bit extra money rather then health benefits.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  40. Re:Translation by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Agree with your crock of shit statement. I *despise* wearing a tie. However, all that is psychological, not physical.

  41. Objecting to what? by dog77 · · Score: 1

    Any idea what some IBM employees found objectional in CEO Ginni Rometty's letter to US president Donald Trump? https://www.ibm.com/blogs/poli...

    Was it that he congratulated Trump on his victory? Otherwise it seems very business focused and not political at all.

  42. Re:Typical millennial thinking by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Where I am they treat contractors exactly the same as employees, except they get a bit extra money rather then health benefits.

    Since I work for contracting agencies, I get the extra money and a full benefit package.

  43. Re:Typical millennial thinking by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    In my line of work, contractors don't get "company" benefits and are the first to go when business slows down, but unlike us "first class citizens" with 401k match and benefits, they get to charge by the hour whereas we are salaried.

    I never work directly for the clients. I work as an employee for a contracting agency that provides a full benefit package to stay competitive in the labor market. I'm usually the "contractor" that the company brings in after they fire all the full-time staff members to clean up the mess.

  44. Re:Typical millennial thinking by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Either way, your staffing firm charges by the hour of which you get (I would guess) a pretty high percentage. People who rail against contractors just don't know what they're talking about.

  45. I have seen dress pants / ties / nice shits cablei by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I have seen dress pants / ties / nice shits cabling / hooking and unhook systems from desks jobs. That can get measly fast.

    dress pants, button-down shirt and tie preferred for a temp PC move in an office building job.

  46. Re:Translation by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    "Why does a tie imply professionalism? Why not focus on how efficient your employees are and the accomplishments of your company instead of associating it with arbitrary fashion? This applies to your customers as well."

    The customer is always right. They get to vote with their wallet or feet, and don't have to be professional.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  47. Worker revolution will be coming by Nyder · · Score: 1

    It's pretty obvious to me that the worker revolution is going to be happening in the next 20 years if not sooner. The rich keep trying to squeeze whatever they can out of people and the environment and the younger generation is pissed.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Worker revolution will be coming by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we can look forward to a feudal system in the next 20 years. You know, where women, minorities have no say at all. Most are in ... basic slavery. Yes, that's what we need, because from history that's what happens when you take down a free society like the US is right how.

      Only really stupid people would do that.

  48. Here's a good example by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    AFAIK this is real.

    (As heard on the No Agenda podcast.)

  49. Re:Translation by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Dress codes do indeed have little personal benefit if you're sitting at a desk in an office all day. However it's also been proven that dressing professional makes people act more professional. And often people have to interact with clients, even if you're just sitting at a desk, clients may come in for meetings, they expect a certain decorum.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  50. Re:Translation by Evtim · · Score: 1

    I opened this tread with enthusiasm and what do I see - it's about clothing and white men. Well, I think this is the least of our problems. How about this - my company might be soon a subject of a hostile take over from US corporation. Now, I would very much like if the employees had any say about THAT, you know.....tens of thousands of jobs are at the stake plus enormous losses to the country and society should my company disappear. Not to mention the hit on the environment - the US corp has a dismal record and gives less than shit about it - that is why they have the money, cause we spend extra cash on sustainability..... But it's private business and we are all hostages to the whims and greed of as handful of individuals. Game over, man!

    OK, then listen up - I have a fact to tell you about the white men - hopefully it might provoke a bit of that moron thing that we sometimes do - you know it is called thinking [RIP George]. I am studying advanced Dutch ATM and the text book is very recent and modern - talks about all the social issues of the day. Pity I can't post screenshot from the book - statistics from 2014 - percentage of women in high management positions per country. Guess who are the champions [top ten] - the former Soviet countries with Russia NUMBER ONE in the world. China plus Philippines and Indonesia are also in. At the same time US and UK are at the BOTTOM ten on that account with [attention!] the Netherlands being second to last before only Japan.

    Now look again and explain to me how those facts fit the narrative of the big bad eastern bear and other fucking communists [China, China, China, China, China]. But are really the former communist state less sexists? You mean the Russians who on other counts [gays] are adamant enemies to the humanistic values - they are less sexists than us - yhea it is true. Reason - communism. One - no strong religion [it's coming back though], two - equality between people also implies equality between genders. My mom did much better career than dad, brought more money home and noone batted an eyelid.

    But think again - is the Netherlands a hell hole of sexism? Or Japan for that matter....no they are not [NL certainly isn't]. So perhaps, just perhaps such statistic does not tell the whole story and maybe we should concentrate on things I described in the first paragraph rather than how many white men are at the top.

     

  51. Re:Typical millennial thinking by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Uh huh. White collar work and hourly caps don't really mix. Sane countries like France have abysmal unemployment numbers because of thinking like that.

  52. Re:Translation by Kiuas · · Score: 1

    They also promote the image the company wants to project publicly in many cases.

    Fun anecdote about this that happened to a friend who's a linux sysadmin at a midsize software house here in Finland. Much like me (and most people I know that don't have to be in regular customer contact). He usually wears hoodies, t-shirts, cargopants. You know, the typical 'casual and comfortable nerdy look" but for said meeting with a larger customer he was prepared to suit up, when his boss actually interrupted him and told him not to do that but wear his regular clothes.

    The reason for this is that having your linux guy look slightly nerdish (while still being clean and professional) is something they wanted to do for image reasons.

    I've never much like suits partially because being in a wheelchair getting into one takes a fuckton of time and I rather dress comfortably, so unless I'm outright ordered to do so by my superiors I'll wear what I always wear. And just recently I was in a joint meeting with several people, some guys from the army were along. Some people were wearing suits, one was wearing a woolen shirt, the officers were all in uniforms and I was in the corner wearing a Metallica-hoodie. If they did judge me for that they were very good at hiding it, because I sensed no disrespect from anyone, and never have, but I'd like to think that's because I know what I'm talking about and the respect is earned through actions and not based on appearance.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  53. Re:Translation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    Try a cravat instead. Couple of with a monocle. That look never goes pour of style.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  54. Only because... by zifn4b · · Score: 2

    The only reason employees feel compelled to take the wheel is because they realize that their leadership is completely incompetent and delusional. We'd really actually like REAL leaders that actually do their job so we can just do ours but that's apparently like asking for the sun, the moon and the stars anymore.

    I think the best part is how there are plenty of articles about burnt out and overworked managers with self help strategies like delegating work. So, let me get this straight, you, the poor woe is me manager, that's sitting in meetings all day playing on your phone is so stressed out that you should get special privileges to delegate any work arbitrarily that you want to and get paid more money? Where's my special privilege? Why can't I delegate that fly-in on fire shit ball task that you want done yesterday? Double standard.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  55. Publix is employee owned by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Literally, the only way to own Publix stock is to work there. If one of the owners (that's what workers are - they get shares) is circulating a "petition" then they don't understand how ownership in a company works.

  56. You want a say? by ogar572 · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple. Start your own company!!!! Then you can run it how ever you want!!!!

  57. Re:Typical millennial thinking by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I think you just gave management the list of who to fire first, working for old media it isn't like you are going to make it to retirement working for a newspaper. Poor job choice. Poor-er decision to paint a target on your back.

    What make you think that I'm associated with "old media" in general and newspapers in particular? Those are two industries that I never worked in.

    Find a different job, give notice, at the exit interview tell them how great they are so they will give you a great reference.

    I've been a contractor for 20+ years. The trend among Fortune 500 companies for the last 20+ years is to hire more contractors. I've gotten great references because I'm the guy who gets called in to clean up the messes left behind by full-time employees or contractors.

  58. Re:Typical millennial thinking by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Yes, and in sane countries salaried positions had the union negotiate the max number of hours per week, too.

    I haven't worked overtime in over a decade because my employment contracts prohibits me from working over 40 hours a week. Fortune 500 companies and the government don't want to pay overtime at my rate.

  59. No duh... by whitroth · · Score: 2

    So, first you let big business destroy unions in the US, when folks grandparents fought, in many cases literally, to form, and how you feel helpless.

    And a petition's going to get upper management to change their minds. I'm sure the idea of forming a union again never entered your pretty little libertarian-brainwashed heads....

  60. Re:Translation by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Long time ago, someone also told me to dress for the job I want, that's been somewhat successful.

    I tried that, but they told me the cape and cowl were not appropriate.

  61. Re:Translation by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1
    For someone accusing someone else of not being able to read, you're pretty bad at it too. The comment in question says

    but where I live, pretty much all the public schools require uniforms

    Note the "where I live" qualifier there.

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.