Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Is Ditching the Egg (fastcodesign.com)

Long time reader and journalist harrymcc writes: In 2010, Twitter started representing new users with an icon of an egg. It was playful at the time, but the image has come to represent the worst of Twitter: trolls and bots. So the company is killing the egg. For Fast Company, I talked to Twitter's designers about their rationale for doing away with the well-known symbol, and the challenge of replacing it. From the article: The idea was that "eventually you'd crack out of an egg and become an amazing Twitter user," says senior manager of product design Bryan Haggerty, who worked on the project and recalls toying with the idea of even showing the hatching in progress. Nowadays, "the playfulness of Twitter is in the content our users are creating, versus how much the brand steps forward in the UI," says product designer Jen Cotton. Starting today, however, the egg is history. Twitter is dumping the tarnished icon for a new default profile picture -- a blobby silhouette of a person's head and shoulders, intentionally designed to represent a human without being concrete about gender, race, or any other characteristic. Everyone who's been an egg until now, whatever their rationale, will automatically switch over.

75 comments

  1. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So they replaced a generic placeholder with a generic placeholder.

    This solves the problem how?

    1. Re:Eh? by DaHat · · Score: 2

      By solving the rampant alektorophobia that exists on the site.

      Receive a reply which you disagree with? Is the users icon an egg? Rather than respond with "I disagree because ____!", simply dismiss them as an egg to tout your moral superiority.

      I think I read a book about this when I was a kid.

    2. Re:Eh? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0

      So they replaced a generic placeholder with a generic placeholder.

      intentionally designed to represent a human without being concrete about gender

      Did you think the story about the trolls was the true one or is this a SJW gender battle inside Twitter? Eggs are female, after all.

      Meanwhile, Facebook still insists on knowing if you're male or female when you sign up.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Eh? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Eggs are female?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By solving the rampant alektorophobia that exists on the site.

      Receive a reply which you disagree with? Is the users icon an egg? Rather than respond with "I disagree because ____!", simply dismiss them as an egg to tout your moral superiority.

      So now we'll simply dismiss them as a generic bot to tout our moral superiority. What's changed?

      I think I read a book about this when I was a kid.

      Not relevant until bot accounts start paying @SylvesterMcMonkeyMcBean to replace their generic bot symbol with an egg, since the old egg will be the new cool.

    5. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggs are female?

      I know that the simple concept of gender is very confusing for some people for some reason, but eggs are produced by females. On the other hand, sperm is produced by males.

      Sperm cells are motile (they have a tail), while egg cells are not (they do not have a tail). The egg depicted in the traditional Twitter placeholder image clearly has no tail. Thus it is a female egg, and not a male sperm.

    6. Re:Eh? by TWX · · Score: 1

      I guess that if you want to be pedantic, unfertilized eggs are female, but given that the point of the egg as represented on the twit farm was of a developing embryo that wasn't ready yet, calling eggs female is like calling fetuses female when clearly about half are not.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re: Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the egg represented a new user before they grew into there own and every one started that way the symbol was good but times change and so do definitions or grown definitions.

    8. Re:Eh? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Hey... It's a place for people who complain about check-marks being elitist.
      Regular logic doesn't work there.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    9. Re:Eh? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Much easier. Set auto-ignore to include all eggs.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Eh? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      alektorophobia

      How many years have you been waiting for the opportunity to use that word?

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    11. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If having a tail = male, then how do you account for species in which males AND females have tails? If being motile = male, then what about all the single-celled bacteria that can move, with or without a tail, pilus, etc? Should I mention that bacteria are asexual? Biologically, of course. They aren't just "identifying" as such, that's well beyond their capability (saying that is sure to offend).

      Trying to decide if something is male or female by arbitrary shapes, or because one is produced by one and the other by the other is patently absurd.

      The egg provides one X chromosome. Not enough to constitute female.
      The sperm provides either a Y or an additional X chromosome. More variety but still not enough to qualify as either.
      The combination, XY (male) or XX (female) is the result.

      Some malformed (calling them that is also sure to offend) sperm cells come with TWO Y chromosomes, or TWO X chromosomes or one of each, resulting in an embryo that is XYY, XXX or XXY respectively, all of which almost always (basically always) produce clearly mentally, physically or reproductively malformed humans (but NOT EVER hermaphrodites).

      In the early embryonic stages, nipples, a vulva, a pair of placeholder reproductive-cell-producing organs and an internal cavity form.
      When embryonic development reaches the stage at which sex is established...
      > if XX, the placeholders turn into ovaries, which at puberty will produce and send egg cells to the interval cavity (womb), and the beginnings of mammories form beneath the nipples to be fully developed at puberty
      > if XY, the vulva seals shut (now to be called a scrotum - note the seam on it), the plumbing reroutes through the nerve cluster (what was the clitoris) and it extends out (now to be called the glans), the placeholders turn into testies which will descend, some time after birth, into the scrotum, sperm produced by the testies goes back inside to be stored in the internal cavity and nipples remain unused
      > else, everything just goes haywire and usually remains incomplete and disfunctional

      I'm no human biologist but that handwavy description pretty much sums it up to the extent that a laymen could possibly care.

      Male, female, and if you want to be thorough, broken. Those are the possibilities, and YOU don't get to choose what you are, just as you do not get to choose your hand when you play card games. Everything else, whether it's a person's manner of speaking, choice of clothing and other cosmetic adornments like makeup and jewelry, preference of sexual partners and sexual acts is BEHAVIORAL, which is not solely based on sex but also the entirety of your individual biological make up and life experiences. That, in turn, is not "gender". "Gender" is just a synonym for "sex".

      Do they not teach this anymore?

    12. Re:Eh? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      None, it is not an uncommon term to use on the twitter.

    13. Re: Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a picture of an egg, it's a picture of an egg shell.

      The shell is just calcium or whatever and not alive, not male or female.

      It's what's inside the shell that is alive, has a gender, etc.

    14. Re:Eh? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if the idea is the egg hatched into a bird (their logo), clearly the egg is either gender neutral, or if it's hatching the twitter bird male (based on coloring).

      I'd argue gender neutral though, as it was the egg hatching into the user as they mature.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen and believe! The AC said so, therefore its true and we don't have to listen to your mansplaining!

    16. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid response. I'm kinda wishing your dad did that to his sperm at this point.

    17. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This solves the problem how?

      What problem are you trying to solve?

      Not every change is an attempt to solve a problem.

  2. You can't burn through $2 Billion in losses by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without breaking a few eggs.

    1. Re:You can't burn through $2 Billion in losses by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      That's quite a staggering amount of money to lose. Are you implying that Twitter's got the egg on its face?

    2. Re:You can't burn through $2 Billion in losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no yolk.

    3. Re:You can't burn through $2 Billion in losses by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      Not egg, just Russian trolls and Russian bot armies. And don't forget the Russian Neo-Nazis, because that makes fucking sense.

  3. WTF is Twitter? by turp182 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Other than Donald's way of annoying everyone.

    Seriously?

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:WTF is Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is mostly a endless source of "articles" for lazy journalists. When there are no juicy tweets available, they can create articles from twitter itself. Fortunately the AI will soon replace these lazy ass writers, who just copy paste some crap from tweets into newspapers.

    2. Re:WTF is Twitter? by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's a way for people to bypass publicists and other fairly expensive forms of communication with the press and with a fanbase without having to maintain one's own infrastructure like an e-mail distribution server. Its original novelty was that due to its character limit it was compatible with TAPP and SMS, so alphapagers and text messaging on even dumb phones could receive it, but that character limitation has helped to dumb-down the message.

      As the AC above me has said, it's also a source for lazy journalists, especially if people who are known to be controversial and good for ratings use it a lot. They love to repeat what others have said on Twitter even though those who care about the twit are probably already following them, so we get an endless barrage of, "you won't believe what X said on Twitter!" when it's not even a matter of not believing, it's a matter of not caring.

      Unfortunately for Twitter, there doesn't really seem to be a good way to monetize it. They're stuck paying for what I have to assume is expensive infrastructure to maintain but with their character limit and intentional ability to send notifications to non-web devices and protocols that aren't twitter's own clients they can't get ad revenue, and apparently their backend is so badly written that they can't even do a good job of data-mining to sell trend data.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:WTF is Twitter? by turp182 · · Score: 0

      My first Troll rated comment!

      It was more about Twitter not being relevant (except for one person).

      Not as meaningful as my first +5 Insightful, but still worth remembering...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    4. Re:WTF is Twitter? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for Twitter, there doesn't really seem to be a good way to monetize it.

      Which is to say that they can make $700 million in revenue, which is more than enough to sustain operations, but they can't match Facebook or Google money.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re: WTF is Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope nobody tells him about Presidential Alerts... At least now I can avoid his text rants!

    6. Re:WTF is Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      I'm so tired of seeing reporters and journalists citing twitter. Hey... I'm reporting LIVE here on TV and I don't know what the fuck is going on, but reports are coming in from Twitter saying X, Y and Z.

      Seriously? Twitter as a news source? I'll bet the news stations have Twitter trolls putting shit out there just to throw off competing news agencies. And if they don't, they will eventually.

  4. Excellent Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah yes, this will surely solve the problem with trolls and bots. It was totally because of the egg icon! I'm glad they rooted out the problem. Now that this is fixed, I'm sure they will start making money any second now.

    1. Re:Excellent Idea by pseudofrog · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Excellent Idea" instead of "Eggsellent Idea"?

      For shame.

  5. This is the BEST news I could have hoped for today by gosand · · Score: 2

    No wait, I mean - WTF? THIS is considered not only news, but news for nerds?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  6. Re:This is the BEST news I could have hoped for to by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Nerds like to argue about how stupid news can be, so yes, news for nerds.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  7. Twitter is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *shrug*

  8. Re:This is the BEST news I could have hoped for to by balbeir · · Score: 1

    But it's not stuff that matters

  9. I will never understand branding and marketing by redmid17 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But this concept: "The idea was that "eventually you'd crack out of an egg and become an amazing Twitter user," says senior manager of product design Bryan Haggerty, who worked on the project and recalls toying with the idea of even showing the hatching in progress."

    I just lack the words to describe exactly how I can convey this in a way that expresses incredulity, confusion, and its state of being a sheer bad idea.

    1. Re:I will never understand branding and marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of anyone becoming an amazing Twitter user boggles the mind.

    2. Re:I will never understand branding and marketing by Rozzin · · Score: 1

      And here the message I always got from the default `egg' avatar was that they were calling their users eggheads.

      --
      -rozzin.
    3. Re:I will never understand branding and marketing by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      I don't know, it seems about as lucid and rational as any other left-wing "thinking".

  10. okay by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    The takeaway here is that all the cool eggs will make themselves eggs again.

  11. Just one more reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that TWITter is for TWITS!

  12. Re:This is the BEST news I could have hoped for to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither is 99% of the shit nerds like to talk about.

  13. Re: This is the BEST news I could have hoped for t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's important to us nerfs xD

  14. Are these idiots out of business yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their ability to keep on running at a loss is astounding.

  15. Re: Snowflakes on Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter is full of Nazi bigots who try to shake people down for their beliefs. SJWs will be the end of this country. They should all move to California.

  16. who the fuck uses twitter anyways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a fucking idiotic and useless way t9 communicate

  17. Sad! by pteddy · · Score: 1

    Sad!

  18. Might I recommend rebranding and marketing as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Doucher' complete with a wet steaming turd icon for all newbies, and eventually having an animated 'cleaning' process, wherein a tiny human appears out of the mass of fecal matter and slowly cleans themselves off to become a model social network member.

    I think it would provide the double benefit of giving new users a reason to learn netiquette, as well as helping to elicit imagery suitable of Twitter's business plan, future prospects, and general community quality at this time. Who knows, maybe they will prove you CAN polish a turd.

  19. Another kind of fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because who cares

  20. Then there's generic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beware of genericity. The "a blobby silhouette of a person's head and shoulders" better not look anything like the "a blobby silhouette of a person's head and shoulders" that Microsoft uses in unpersonalized Office365 accounts or risk the ire of the pack of rabid lawyers.

  21. In other words... by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    ...instead of actually dealing with the trolls and bots, we're going to stop identifying them clearly.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some bots don't have the egg but instead have pictures of women randomly obtained from Google images...

    2. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter's solution to dealing with problems is to never make a profit, watch their stock drop, and eventually file for bankruptcy protection.

      THAT will take care of their troll problem once and for all.

  22. *News Just In* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are ditching the fascist censored platform known as twitter, in droves.

    1. Re:*News Just In* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are ditching the fascist censored platform known as twitter, in droves.

      Because they are tired of being eggs? That makes no sense. I mean, Easter is just around the corner.

  23. Time to acknowledge reality by TheSouthernDandy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe they should just introduce a troll icon, and a bot icon, along with a rating system a la Slashdot. Once a user crosses a threshold on "Troll" or "Bot" ratings, their icon automatically gets changed to one or the other.

    In fact, just create icons to go along with every rating category, and change their icon based on how a user is rated.

    Actually, come to think of it, Slashdot IS hardened Twitter, without the popularity (or icons).

    1. Re:Time to acknowledge reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but on Slashdot, we have intelligent mature conversations.
      Twitter is just filled with inane selfies and "I took a poop!" posts.

    2. Re:Time to acknowledge reality by WallyL · · Score: 1

      Actually, come to think of it, Slashdot IS hardened Twitter, without the popularity (or icons).

      Or unicode!

  24. Human? What about the bots? by lannocc · · Score: 2

    Aren't half the Twitter users simply bots? That the new icon is a human silhouette sounds like wishful thinking to me. So does the silhouette fill in to become a robot once the user has demonstrated enough bot-like activity?

    1. Re:Human? What about the bots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there aren't any bot SJWs to get triggered on this one, so...

  25. Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " a blobby silhouette of a person's head and shoulders, intentionally designed to represent a human without being concrete about gender, race, or any other characteristic."

    Come on that's obviously biased against people without heads, how could Twitter be so insensitive?!?

  26. Ditch yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter isn't suiciding themselves fast enough. That company has become a cesspool of everything that's politcally correct. They need to speed up their death.

  27. Forget the egg by Lirodon · · Score: 1

    Go back to this, then we'll talk.

  28. Bah. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Some of us were birds before it was cool.

  29. Re: Snowflakes on Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where nobody uses twitter?

  30. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should stop that company from bleeding investor's money like a sieve

  31. An egg by any other name by istartedi · · Score: 1

    An egg by any other name, will smell just as rotten.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  32. Say, that seems handy... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Say, that seems handy...

    Can I block everyone using the default icon?

  33. Amazing Twitter user? by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    Better chance of transforming into a rainbow flying bigfoot unicorn with mutant superpowers.

  34. April Fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely this is an April Fools? Nope, posted on March 31st.

    Seriously folks, stop and think: Twitter changed an icon and a product manager did terrible design... Let's all just move along.

  35. Twitter sockpuppetry by tepples · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard much out of Twitter since over a dozen of his sockpuppets were outed.