Slashdot Mirror


TV's Golden Age Is Anything But, Say Writers Preparing To Strike (bloomberg.com)

The world's largest media companies returned to the negotiating table Monday with Hollywood screenwriters, seeking to avert a strike that could cost the entertainment industry billions of dollars and take popular TV shows off the air indefinitely. From a report on Bloomberg: Hollywood is bracing for the worst-case scenario after the Writers Guild of America warned advertisers and investors of the financial fallout and said members will most likely walk out May 2 if the new round of talks fail. Major TV programmers, such as NBC and CBS' flagship network, are scanning their slates of upcoming shows to determine which ones can air without guild writers. Negotiators on both sides are counting on cooler heads to prevail as they seek to avoid a repeat of the 100-day work stoppage in 2007-08 that cost the entertainment industry more than $2 billion, according to Milken Institute estimates. Yet the entertainment business, specifically TV, has undergone myriad changes that are creating new sticking points since the last strike almost a decade ago, and the writers say they haven't benefited.

200 comments

  1. Umm, okay... by Penguinisto · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen a typical Network TV channel in literally months.

    Strike all you want, campers. I'm fine with it.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok you haven't watched their channels, but what about their shows?

    2. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned? Please share, what else makes you special?

    3. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that sag, screen writers, and others have their paws deeply entrenched into your "atypical" programs as well, right?

      a strike would affect your premium channel originals from hbo and original series from amazon and netflix, too.

      so as long as you're fine with reruns, old recordings and dvds, and with an increase in "reality" crap.. sure, go ahead, root for the strike.

    4. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't affect you at all so you don't care. You wouldn't happen to be a Republican, would you?

    5. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      baloney. There are THOUSANDS of writers who would PAY to have their art on Amazon and Netflix.

    6. Re:Umm, okay... by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You mean, apart from saving $1000+ a year, and not willingly subjecting ourselves to IQ squandering nonsense (ie: the typical news), and lowest-common-denominator sitcoms, leaving time free to do more useful things?

    7. Re:Umm, okay... by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's like breaking an addiction. Or a bad habit. It's like when ex smokers say they never realized how many things they can smell now and how much better food tastes, etc.

      It's not pride. It's the revelation of how much better it is to not watch TV any more. The extra time you have. The fact that TV gives you nothing in return. It wasn't even that entertaining actually. Just an effort to find the least objectionable content. And the ads, OMG, the ads, don't get me started.

      If you watch some on-demand programming, you can get some better quality entertainment, in less time, and with no commercials. And get up and walk away from the TV because there are also other and better things to do.

      Even if I sit in front of the TV and just browse YouTube, it is amazing the great stuff I can find. Videos of presentations from various conferences. Class lectures. There is a guy with a great set of videos Introduction to Higher Math. Various tutorials. It's way better than couch potato cable TV.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their shows suck.

    9. Re:Umm, okay... by hoffmanjon · · Score: 1

      I would love to share it with you, thanks for asking. Because I do not watch TV I have time to write books (seven to my name so far), build robots, teach my daughters robotics, Learn 3D printing and 3D modeling. I do this while so many other people sit in front of the TV.

    10. Re:Umm, okay... by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is unclear what effect a writers guild strike would have on Fox News.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    11. Re:Umm, okay... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned? Please share, what else makes you special?

      Because people who watch TV tend to have really annoying/detrimental habits - like comparing people they know in real life to characters in shows. Those kind of people are a plague on society, explicitly because they are easily-controlled soulless abominations directed by the liberal extremists.

    12. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, personally, would rather spend my time doing something useful than watch television. I don't even own one. I'm really lucky to have almost perfect vision. I'm guessing it's because I don't watch TV. In fact, I don't even own one. Last week, in one of the magazines, there was a picture of Calista Flockhart. I have absolutely no idea who this woman is. Calista who? Am I supposed to have heard of her? I'm sorry, but I haven't.

      I'm not an elitist. It's just that I'd much rather sculpt or write in my journal or read Proust than sit there passively staring at some phosphorescent screen. If I need a fix of passive audio-visual stimulation, I'll go to catch a Bergman or Truffaut film down at the university. I certainly wouldn't waste my time watching the so-called Learning Channel or, God forbid, any of the mind sewage the major networks pump out.

      People don't realize just how much time their TV-watching habit–or, shall I say, addiction–eats up. Four hours of television a day, over the course of a month, adds up to 120 hours. That's five entire days! Why not spend that time living your own life, instead of watching fictional people live theirs? I can't begin to tell you how happy I am not to own a television.

    13. Re:Umm, okay... by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always took it as hyper bold that tv rots the brain. Then I watched the difference between people who watch tv all the time and those who don't watch much at all. The differences are enough that even though I don't have cable I am not planning on getting it or letting kids watch much of it.

      See both liberal and conservatives who watch a lot of tv and its political spins va those who don't.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:Umm, okay... by sexconker · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned? Please share, what else makes you special?

      Because people who watch TV tend to have really annoying/detrimental habits - like comparing people they know in real life to characters in shows. Those kind of people are a plague on society, explicitly because they are easily-controlled soulless abominations directed by the liberal extremists.

      Calm down, Dwight.

    15. Re:Umm, okay... by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      these people are about as annoying as vegans

    16. Re:Umm, okay... by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      yeah, but most of us wouldn't pay to watch their shows cause they write about as good as most Fan Fiction writers

    17. Re:Umm, okay... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Please share, what else makes you special?

      Some of them are vegans.

    18. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done!

    19. Re:Umm, okay... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Only save that much if you scrap internet too.

      I'd get typical network added onto my service for free (technically $5 less, but I told them I was canceling if they sent me the damned box and remote that I had to keep track of and would literally never unbox because it wasn't worth the HDMI port or hitting the input button on my TV).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    20. Re: Umm, okay... by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Maybe we hate to see others waste what little time they have on this little blue marble slackjawing at a screen.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    21. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't effect just broadcast TV. WGA members write the majority of scripted television and movies regardless of whether it is broadcast over the airwaves, part of a cable package, or seen in theaters.

    22. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do all that AND watch TV without being sanctimonious about it.

    23. Re:Umm, okay... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you write about as well as most fan fiction writers' cats.

    24. Re:Umm, okay... by dgatwood · · Score: 0

      Ah, but is it watching TV that rots the brain or rotten brains that cause the TV watching?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Umm, okay... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      yeah, but most of us wouldn't pay to watch their shows cause they write about as good as most Fan Fiction writers

      How does that differ from most TV writers again?

      I would class 90% of the shows I have seen as having writing that I would categorize as "bad fan fiction".

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    26. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Maybe we hate to see others waste what little time

      "Maybe?" No, that's not it. You couldn't give a shit on how others spend their time being entertained by watching their favorite shows. Unless, of course, its too belittle their enjoyment and pathetically make yourself feel superior.

    27. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because we're kind of taught that if you find a method that kind of works for you, its your God given rightâ to stand on your soap box and enlighten all us unenlightened individuals as to exactly what we're doing wrong and your advice on how to correct it rather than just leading by example. Worse yet, there are people hungering to be told these things. That's why we still have churches and self help seminars and the ilk.

    28. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the names of the shows that you feel are in the 10% category of non "bad fan fiction"?

    29. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    30. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a hobby, spend time on the hobby and do some thing productive with your time. Sitting around drooling and watching TV does not give you anything back, at all. Sure, once in a while, but everyday is just pathetic.

    31. Re:Umm, okay... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The golden age of TV was in the 70's and 80's. Some stuff was cheesy but some stuff from that time was actually pretty good while still being cheesy and some was really good.

      Among the really good stuff was in my opinion Monty Python's Flying Circus, Kojak, MASH and Hill Street Blues. Good and Cheesy was Happy Days and then too many bad cheesy shows not worth to remember.

      And we didn't have all those age ratings everywhere and seldom a "Don't try this at home" except when something was really dangerous.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    32. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen a typical Network TV channel in literally months.

      Strike all you want, campers. I'm fine with it.

      Cut the cord years ago. Netflix and piracy ftw. If I can subscribe to a show with no ads that I can store and run any time anywhere... pleas TAKE MY MONEY. Otherwise go fuck yourself. Torrented content is simply far superior to anything else. I wish I could support content creators directly, unfortunately middle douches don't want me to do that. Oh well, now instead of pennies they get 0. I sleep well at night by paying for Netflix and Amazon. If I can't buy it, fuck em. Piracy is a perfect example of a free market. I am looking at you as well Electronic Arts. Go. Fuck yourself.

    33. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did somebody ask, "Should I watch TV? What are some good reasons to stop?" Or are you so arrogant that you're just answering those questions for us unprompted? Maybe you think that we were unaware that we have choices on how to spend our time. Thanks for enlightening us. Maybe if you're patient with us, we'll be able to ascend to your level.

    34. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned? Please share, what else makes you special?

      I don't think that "watching TV" mean what you think it means any more. I was born in early 80s and managed to figure it out. To me "watching TV" means torrenting the shit out of it, if I can't otherwise obtain a usable product at a reasonable price. They can take their region locked software and especially hardware DRM shit and shove it right back up their ass. I am willing to provide a helping boot to make sure it stays far up there.

      Want me to stop torrenting? Give me a non shit deal. I am not gona jump over hoops just to watch a legit, fucking overpriced, probably shitty third Hollywood reboot of what used to be arguably good 30 years ago, with 10 minutes of fucking FBI warnings among other things.

    35. Re:Umm, okay... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      what, pray tell is 'hyper bold'?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    36. Re:Umm, okay... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing they meant "hyperbole" and their computer/device tried to be "helpful".

    37. Re:Umm, okay... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, yes, I am quitting facebook. It's easier to not have an account than risk getting pulled over and throw into a US jail just cause the border guard doesn't like the cat videos I posted.

      But to your main point... I don't advertise it unless it's actually relevant to the discussion. Such as when someone asks me "Have you seen this so and so new TV show?"

      I don't, however, SJW Vegan about it. I can't speak for the original poster, but I see nothing wrong with them declaring that they don't watch TV. I'm more curious as to why it bothers you so much. I would have forgotten within seconds that I had even read the original comment because it provides nothing of value to me. It was actually your comment that caught my interest and induced me to reply.

    38. Re:Umm, okay... by penandpaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The ads are absolute cancer. I never realized how bad TV ads were until I would visit the in-laws and sit down to watch whatever was on to pass the evening by. Holy shit. They hit all the right buttons to get my attention or to get me to stare at the screen and I felt stupid after a set of commercials. I don't know what it is but I know I don't want it in my life.

    39. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "don't own one" said twice, so your short term memory took a hit because you don't practice recall during commercial breaks. cures and ails from everything/

      you are an elitist or a snob, whichever fits.

    40. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, apart from saving $1000+ a year, and not willingly subjecting ourselves to IQ squandering nonsense (ie: the typical news), and lowest-common-denominator sitcoms, leaving time free to do more useful things?

      Hmm, I do all those things and watch whatever the hell I want so it really just sounds like you think you're somehow better and want everyone to know it. If you can't watch some stupid TV and not lower your own intelligence in the process you have a VERY weak mind. Entertainment is entertainment not magic that makes you dumb. The stupidity was already there.

    41. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, its too belittle their enjoyment and pathetically make yourself feel superior.

      *it's

      *to

      You make this too easy.

    42. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching shows about that stuff is not the same as doing it.

    43. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really come off as a snob who can't appreciate anything. TVs can be used for more than just watching the crap networks produce. Just recently I played through NieR: Automata which has way more going on with its story than one with a superficial way of thinking would notice. And it has one of the best soundtracks of anything since maybe the past 7 years or so.

    44. Re: Umm, okay... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      Like commenting on SlashDot? That aside, it's none of your friggin' business how someone spends their leisure time.

    45. Re:Umm, okay... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a typical Network TV channel in literally months.

      What makes you think that the people who write for Netflix and the other non-networks won't also go on strike?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    46. Re: Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Masterful. Deserves +5, Troll.

    47. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      again?...

    48. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that TV gives you nothing in return.

      Damn, you suck at watching TV.

      Even if I sit in front of the TV and just browse YouTube, it is amazing the great stuff I can find. Videos of presentations from various conferences. Class lectures. There is a guy with a great set of videos Introduction to Higher Math. Various tutorials.

      NO ONE CARES, DAD.

    49. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't advertise it unless it's actually relevant to the discussion. Such as when someone asks me "Have you seen this so and so new TV show?"

      Nobody asked.

      I'm more curious as to why it bothers you so much. I would have forgotten within seconds that I had even read the original comment because it provides nothing of value to me.

      Because they come out of the woodwork every time it's mentioned and they act like they have some solution that's never occurred to the rest of us. TV cord cutters and people that avoid Facebook are the worst - They insist on letting everyone know that they're too sophisticated to be troubled with such mundanities.

    50. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned?

      Virtue signaling. They need to let others know they are truly better than the rest.

    51. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what, pray tell is 'hyper bold'?

      It is when your brain rots from watching too much tv...

    52. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means "fresh off the boat", of course....

    53. Re:Umm, okay... by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Even if I sit in front of the TV and just browse YouTube, it is amazing the great stuff I can find. Videos of presentations from various conferences. Class lectures. There is a guy with a great set of videos Introduction to Higher Math. Various tutorials. It's way better than couch potato cable TV.

      [sarcasm]
      Oh yeah, after doing programming all day long and fucking around with docker, asterisk, postfix, nginx, etc. in the meantime, the first thing I want to do when i get home after 8-9 hours of that is do some HIGHER MATH !!!1
      [/sarcasm]

      I know this is popular on slashdot type sites, but seriously though. Give me Married with .. Children, Seinfeld, ... and a beer so I can turn my brain off from constant calculations it's doing half my waking time ... or do you not work ?

    54. Re:Umm, okay... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's not quite up there with announcing you're vegan but it sure does seem to be a point of pride for people. Well done them.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    55. Re:Umm, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD9pJzZ1XGI ...the drug od the nation. Are you addicted?

    56. Re:Umm, okay... by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      Why is it that people who don't watch TV are so damned proud of it that they need to announce it every time TV is mentioned?

      It's the veganism of mass-media entertainment.

      I'm a curmudgeon myself, but, really, folks - find something more interesting to haughtily reject. Proclaiming your independence from broadcast television is like proudly announcing your stand against eating kale.

      Now, if you want to tell us all how you never use emacs...

    57. Re:Umm, okay... by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      Then I watched the difference...

      This is nearly a perfect argument. "Based on a hazy claim of anecodotal observation, I posited a correlation and therefore deduced causation."

      Really, the only way you could improve that is by imputing it to supernatural forces.

    58. Re:Umm, okay... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I have to remind people that we don't get broadcast or cable, since they assume the latest shows are a semi-mandatory part of the common culture. I'm not superior about it. We have our own time-wasting habits.

      Last time we had television service, it was expensive, the shows were almost unwatchable due to commercials, we had to watch on somebody else's schedule, and we couldn't get Minnesota Twins games. Getting the shows from Amazon Prime is much superior.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    59. Re: Umm, okay... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Better slackjawing at a screen than finding reasons to feel superior.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    60. Re:Umm, okay... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My wife was once told that too many people write stories with built-in commercial breaks.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:Umm, okay... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I would class 90% of the shows I have seen as having writing that I would categorize as "bad fan fiction".

      Fortunately, 10% of the shows available should be plenty. There's lots of crap TV. There's some good TV. I try to watch that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    62. Re:Umm, okay... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Continuum

      The 100 (yes really, esp after first season).

      Breaking Bad (of course)

      Stranger Things

      Longmire

      Firefly (of course)

      Torchwood

      The Crown

      Daredevil (netflix)

      Silicon Valley (HBO)

      I would almost say Game of Thrones, but I'm on the fence about it.

      Similarly possibly Halt & Catch fire may be good, but a few shows in I'm not sure I care.

      Those are some of the more recent ones (to me) I can think of.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  2. This is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that Hollywood and the unions were on the same side here. Don't they both donate overwhelmingly to liberal political campaigns? Don't they both believe in supporting the little guy? What gives?

    1. Re:This is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they're on strike the DNC will just pick them up to write more fake news stories for the party, comrade.

    2. Re:This is confusing by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      They believe in money in their own pocket above all else. Next, they care about the little guy, as long as their profits are not affected.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. But should we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ok, but does any of this affect HBO, Netflix, or Syfy? If not, who the fuck cares. With or without the writers the shows on the major networks will suck

    1. Re:But should we care? by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      It covers writers for every distribution channel, including the streaming ones. You can't write for any show without being a Guild member, etc. That's why the last time they went on strike, everything went to reruns and whatnot. If the Writer's Guild goes on strike, they also often get supported by members of the SAG and DG, so you basically get no new movies, tv shows, etc, existing ones are canceled or put on hold until the strike ends, etc, and the reach of this is even into non-USA countries, such as the UK and Canada.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  4. Anything that gives Roberto Orci less money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a GOOD thing.

  5. Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyway.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    Who cares, most "real" shows are going into summer reruns here soon if not already.

    TWD is off till next Oct, etc....

    Not much new content to watch in summer anyway, so, let them strike.

    Just curious, do streaming services like Netflix/Amazon Prime have to bother with writers unions/guilds? If not, well, certainly a boon to them, they can keep churning out what is becoming more and more good independent content that is worth watching.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  6. This is all clearly the fault of.... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    The Evil Content Pirates(tm)

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. Writers Guild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these the same people who rallied against the Gutenberg printing press? And do they consider themselves indispensable? Well, maybe they can find work as flagmen, walking in front to warn of the approaching horseless carriage.

    1. Re:Writers Guild by sinij · · Score: 1

      Are these the same people who rallied against the Gutenberg printing press?

      You hold on to your grudges way too long.

    2. Re:Writers Guild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a grudge, it's a struggle. We're still in the fight against indefinite copyright. These various guilds have always been a significant impediment to progress. They exist to protect their own interests at the expense of others.

    3. Re:Writers Guild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's not a grudge, it's a struggle.

      Welcome to the human condition. You new here?

      >We're still in the fight against indefinite copyright.

      Blame the retards that don't vote in Congress. 90 million Americans didn't vote when they could've in the 2016 election. Blame those retards.

      >These various guilds have always been a significant impediment to progress.

      Not 'always'. Almost nothing 'always' does or is something. The autoworkers union got 500k people into the middle class. The electrician's unions make sure that their linemen get hazard pay, safety equipment and practices and overtime.

      Besides, you forget that your definition of 'guild' conveniently excludes actual corporations, hypocrite. Listen to the Freakonomics podcast 'No Hollywood Ending for the Visual Effects Industry' - http://freakonomics.com/podcast/no-hollywood-ending-visual-effects-industry/

      And that is one, relatively trivial example. The military industrial complex is probably exponentially more complex, and we definitely spend more money on it as a country, and those workers are almost entirely nonunion. Take defense contractors and consultants - almost no union people, if any.

      >They exist to protect their own interests at the expense of others.

      The degree of this problem matters far more than the simple comparison of 'my interests' vs 'the interests of others', if for no other reason that there are potentially infinite numbers of potential interests.

      I don't give a shit about your individual interests, or whether you live or die, same as you feel towards me. However, I give a shit about the popular opinions of the world, and I believe that you are voicing a common, if utterly retarded, viewpoint.

      It's almost as though there are common things that we can band together as groups on, if people stop believing in absolutely retarded things and stop rimjobbing themselves.

    4. Re:Writers Guild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you're on the opposite side?

      The Writer's Guild exists to make sure writers get paid decent wages and have reasonable work environments.

      Copyrights are owned by the studios---the same people who will screw over the writers every chance they get.

      In the end, only the studios can slow progress. They own the copyrights and make the decisions---specifically, who can distribute the content and how.

      The WGA wishes they had the kind of influence the studios have. For now, they've got their hands full making sure their members can feed and clothe a family. Except for the biggest fish, most writers are reliant on the guild to set good terms with the real power---the studios.

  8. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would fill my cable TV guide with lots of look-alike shows which I am not interested in?

    Seriously, how important do these people think that they are? Based on the quality of today's TV, and the splintering of the formats, perhaps they're overpaid as-is?

  9. Same paradigms? by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    It seems current of most TV shows are reality, infomercials, three themes of fiction (lawyers, cops, medical), and news-opinion (this being a news story breaks out and they get a few pretty talking heads to discuss implications but there really is no additional info on that breaking news story). There are cable channels for sports (don't really need writers for those) and movies (which they repeat the same movie few times a month). There is reruns of classic TV shows (no writers needed). Then there is PBS which Trump wants to defund.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:Same paradigms? by klingens · · Score: 1

      You forgot SciFi/Fantasy: time travel/alternate history and some swords/sorcery.

    2. Re:Same paradigms? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      you got me there. I guess I missed (and forgot) when sci-fi channel showed science fiction.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  10. I'm not worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use cable or watch over the air TV. Everything I watch was bought on Amazon and nicely packed on a media playback device. All the shows/movies I love are right where I want em with no commercials and no cable/internet required. Strike away! Heck, collapse the entire industry for all I care. It's mostly reality TV type shows anyway these days.

  11. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering if Netflix and Amazon are itching to license their backlog to the networks if the latter can't fill their timeslots.

  12. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Can we really call Netflix/Amazon Prime 'independent' anymore?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  13. Re:Gay by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The title made sense to me. It didn't seem obfuscated.

    Dear Writers, please, Please, PLEASE, for the love of God, PLEASE strike. Permanently. Maybe find shows on Netflix, Prime HBO, or Fox News that need good creative writers.

    I got rid of cable TV some time ago. Don't miss it actually. I never realized how much time something like CNN, for example, takes up to tell the same news I can read in about seven minutes on Google news, or other online sources. The endless talking heads, droning on and on and on.

    I think it would be quite amusing to watch the whole broadcast model just implode. And a lot of their problems they brought on themselves. Broadcast (even Cable) is so 20th century.

    I'm not sure what to make of your subject line.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  14. Free Market at Work by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is how the free market should work. If wages are really too low, the strike will cost more than just raising the pay for the writers and the networks will cave. If the writers are overpaid, there are still a lot of unemployed people looking for work, the networks can go find new talent who don't belong to the union (they call it guild, but it is acting as a labor union right now).

    Notice that unlike the teachers union, the screen writers guild can't pour in cash to elect their bosses who then kick back raises and benefits, regardless of what is best for the larger organization. This is why all public sector unions need to be banned and why so many Democrats in the past were strongly against public sector unions.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Free Market at Work by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Exactly, to avoid a $2B loss, just pay less than $2B to the writers. Problem solved!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Free Market at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FYI - WGA is a democracy. The members elect their (non-paid) leaders who volunteer their time in service of there fellow writers. There is no structure where the elected leadership can grease their own pockets at the expense of the members.

      The total amount of money being fought over is a drop in the bucket compared to both current increases in profits as well as anticipated losses if there was a strike.

      I suspect that if the markets really were "free" that there would be less acrimony over these negotiations if there was. The studios are now huge corporations that are owned by even larger entertainment conglomerates which are often owned by even larger multinational corporations. Monopolies unbalance the equation and can lead to results that one would otherwise consider irrational in the marketplace.

    3. Re:Free Market at Work by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      You want to go after public sector unions, start with the police, not the teachers.

    4. Re:Free Market at Work by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. Both.

    5. Re:Free Market at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a fucking idiot

    6. Re:Free Market at Work by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Great, so say the writers settle for an extra billion....
      Now, the directors (yes, they also have a guild) want theirs..
      Next, of course, the actors.
      Sound, Cameramen, Editors...

      And we haven't even scratched the surface, those are just people working DIRECTLY on the productions..

      So yeah, great thinking there.
      I wonder when they will realise that broadcast television is in big trouble, and they are busy helping to push it off the cliff?
      My guess is about a year after their jobs are gone..

    7. Re:Free Market at Work by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      That's my point though, there are a lot of young, talented millennials who would love to have those jobs at the current wages. Writers can easily work remotely, and if I were the networks, I would start putting out calls for new writers and submissions of new content and let this whole mess of entitled writers collapse under their own weight and go work at McDonalds for the last 5 years of their careers. I hope Netflix and Amazon pull something like this if it goes to a strike.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    8. Re:Free Market at Work by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Except it's not about wages being too low, but instead about other things.

      For example, for ages, writer's contracts have been exclusive for the year/season. but shows have gone from 24 episodes a season to 10 episodes a season. So effectively, their income was cut in half, even though their salary was still the same amount of money per episode.

      More importantly, capitalism does NOT work the way you think it does. Capitalism is more about marketing than it is about skill, particularly when it comes to art. That is, the best marketer makes money, while the best product often loses cash. Think Laser Disc/Beta Max/ VHS. The story of Van Gogh is far too typical - often the best artists die broke. Look at Tesla vs Edison, which one died wealthy and which died broke.

      Now look at movies - Fifty shades of Gray is a piece of crap, poorly written porn. But it had great marketing, and became a huge book and then a huge movie, all the while really good movies and books do not get popular until long after their creator dies.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    9. Re:Free Market at Work by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Capitalism works exactly how I stated. The difference is some artists want to make money, so they make art that people want (Fifty Shades of Gray or the movie Titanic are two examples) and others make art that they like personally but sells poorly. Marketing is a part of capitalism, but you can only up-sell a turd so much. The reason Fifty Shades and Titanic did well was that they tapped into a basic desire/instinct inherent in many women and fed it just the way they wanted it to be fed. If you are not in that category, it did not appeal to you, but that doesn't make it crap, you were just not the target audience. Art is subjective, one man's art is another's toilet paper.

      Art for the sake of art in a capitalist society will leave you starving, art that people want can make you very rich.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  15. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by klingens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When they strike now, what do you think will air in autumn? Stuff has to be written, then shot, edited and then broadcasted. If nothing is written today, then sometime in autumn there is nothing to broadcast anymore and your summer reruns become all year reruns into summer 2018.

  16. We're not gonna miss anything by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    We NEVER watch broadcast TV. I don't know why the programming is so bad, whether it's the writers, the producers who invent the paradigm or the sponsors. It might be nice to revisit some of the old programs like Mary Tyler Moore, Gunsmoke. and others. If you get MeTV over the air many of these programs are shown there. The problem the networks will have is that these programs took up much more of the half-hour or hour than programs do today and commercial time would be reduced if they were shown in their original format. I guess technology could fix that. And as far a movies are concerned, dialog is almost non existent, it's just gun fights, car chases and unrealistic CGI; maybe that's cheaper than writing dialog for a good story or writers and others involved in making movies have no imagination.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:We're not gonna miss anything by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

      That's an easy one to answer.

      The reason the good content has fled for cable and/or the Internet is because of commercial concerns. The first concern is the palette of the masses. You don't want to be too controversial or too radical or you don't get the broadest audience. Or if you go too far in the opposite direction and have too narrow of an audience. Both of those are a problem for the second concern, selling the commercial space. These programs aren't created to be entertaining, they're created to pass the time between swaths of 30-second sale pitches. Now, they can be entertaining and being entertaining helps since in theory that could get the commercials a larger audience, which is the whole point.

      Now the twist is that TV execs are figuring out audience statistics better, so a show doesn't necessarily have to have the broadest of audiences to survive. An equally acceptable one is a predictable, identifiable audience. Anything which makes it easy to sell commercial time is the key. So if you have a show which has a fairly narrow but easily identifiable audience you have an easier time targeting your broadcast commercials to them.

      For TV execs, the ideal choice is either Friends or Supernatural.

    2. Re:We're not gonna miss anything by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Excellent points. I forgot about appealing to an audience that would sell what the sponsors want to sell without much, or any, controversy. All this leads to dull content. I don't mean the audience is dull or not intelligent. Others have made that connection. Then again, half the population has an IQ less than 100 and that's a significant population with some money to spend.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    3. Re:We're not gonna miss anything by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      EDIT: ... that would buy what the sponsors want to sell. ....

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  17. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2

    ...which would almost make sense if the shows they were going to write next week were scheduled to air this summer, but that is not the timeframe. The writers are smart: they are timing their strike to have the most impact on what the industry knows as the "up fronts," in which networks show off and promote their pending line-up of shows to advertisers. "Now, here's a show we think is going to be HUGE, about a vampire cowboy and his lesbian hacker sister, based on the indie graphic novel... we think it makes sense to charge top-dollar for the ad time..." They can't do that if the writers strike, as they will have nothing to show and/or there will be uncertainty amidst the ad-dollar-spending community over whether a TV ad buy makes as much sense as a placement in some other medium.

  18. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Informative
    Not much new content to watch in summer anyway, so, let them strike.

    Coming in the next few months:
    • -Archer
    • -Better Call Saul
    • -Doctor Who
    • -Leftovers
    • -Fargo
    • -Silicon Valley
    • -The Handmaid's Tale
    • -American Gods
    • -Twin Peaks
    • -House Of Cards
    • -Orphan Black
    • -Preacher
    • -Marvel's The Defenders
    • -and the return of MST3K!

    Summers on TV are great now, not like when we were kids.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  19. "Strike" by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. Entertainment is the new opiate of the masses and now that Trump is in office the liberal extremists in Hollywood want to do what little they can to piss people off.

    1. Re:"Strike" by suutar · · Score: 1

      what's new about it? Even ancient Rome had circuses.

    2. Re:"Strike" by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      The line "opiate of the masses" was critical to reading that post properly. Circuses didn't tell people how to think in highly suggestive manners with any degree of success, they were pure entertainment. Religion is no longer the "opiate of the masses" because it doesn't have the same reach it once did in western cultures, instead there are movies, TV shows, etc - which get people to relate fictitious characters to their real-world associations and in turn react often with prepackaged one-offs typically interpreted by the recipient in a radically different manner than their intentions to further that influence. TL;DR: a circus amuses, modern entertainment influences as religion once did.

    3. Re:"Strike" by suutar · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. I had heard the "religion is the opiate of the masses" before, but I had not grokked that the mental influence was as important (or more so) than the "keeps them distracted from their problems" part. Thanks!

  20. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, don't the TV shows follow a specific lock-step format? What is to keep the writers guild from getting booted and some lit major college grads to write stuff that is likely far better in quality anyway?

    Maybe TV needs a year like what 1983 did to the video gaming industry.

  21. I've seen their work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Rubbish.

    Let them go. They need the time to take night classes for writing.

  22. This is the Golden Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where you have 150 channels, 60% of them are shopping networks or foreign languages, and the majority of the remaining 40% are garbage not worth watching.
    Every great while there /MIGHT/ be something tolerable on.

    Golden Age my ass.

  23. What will I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What will I do?

    I need my sitcoms, with their over-contrived scenes and laugh tracks.

    I need my "reality" tv shows that are heavily scripted.

    I need my talkings heads shows, that gloss over issues and read jokes form the interwebs.

  24. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    summer reruns only happened because the studios were busy filming new episodes and doing pilots for potential new series. The writers know exactly when to strike.

  25. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, don't the TV shows follow a specific lock-step format? What is to keep the writers guild from getting booted and some lit major college grads to write stuff that is likely far better in quality anyway?

    I like that idea. We might get some TV episodes that are new and fresh.

    If the writers go on strike, then as long as the strike lasts, try out different non-professional writers as substitutes. It would be fun to see what they come up with.

  26. Huh? by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    What prevents they guys that run the Screenwriter's Union from doing just that? Nothing, except their constituents don't allow it. The teachers and policemen unions don't either. Anyone who tells you that is lying to you so they can bust the Unions. And you don't understand how Unions work. The reason they can't just hire scabs to write for them is the workers have solidarity. They'll blacklist anyone who breaks ranks (e.g. you'll never work in that town again). Unless the labor market's tight there's only two ways Unions work: solidarity or laws (or both). Otherwise the owner class just uses people's desperation against them. Dems were against Unions in the past because the pro-worker & pro-capitalist parties switched sides.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Huh? by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Since the public sector teachers union apparently gave you a sub standard education, here is a link for you to educate yourself on the topic:

      https://www.nytimes.com/roomfo...

      I honestly can't tell what you are saying beyond that. I get the concept of collective bargaining, but it only goes so far in a free market. If you and all your co workers work collectively is worth $50/hr per person to your employer and they pay you $35/hr (this is typical and how all economic transactions work, your work is always more valuable to them than what your employer pays you, that is how they make money, expand the business and pay back investors etc.) but you demand $60/hr in wages and benefits, one of two things happens, the company either goes bankrupt paying you more than you are worth collectively (and you have no job), or they fire you and hire other workers who are willing to work for a lower wage (and you have no job). The best way to increase wages is to vote for politicians that will un-FUBAR our business environment, making it easier to start and grow a business and hire employees. The more demand for labor there is, the higher prices will go. You should also vote for politicians who will restrict H1B and immigration in general (legal and illegal) because those are both sources of cheap labor that will keep the price of labor down, which keeps down your paycheck.

      This is all being said in the context of jobs that require minimal specialization/training and are generally easy to do (like teaching grade-school children, which used to be performed to a higher standard than today by high school graduates). If you have specialized skills or knowledge either through experience, invention or advanced knowledge/degree, you can more easily bargain with your employer on a per person basis.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  27. Dr Horrible Season 2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is about time that those hacks let us have nice things.

    A problem is that talented writers like funny comedians are few and very far between.
    Another problem is that the demand for talented writers WAY exceeds the supply. Sturgeon's law ends up exceedingly optimistic when applied to writers.
    Another problem is writers now grew up as fans and are "writing" what they know.. which is someone else's work.
    Add in tight writing schedules and we are hosed. The guy who can crank out 60 episodes of absolute garbage will gt hired before the guy who can write 6 great episodes.

    So you get hacks just sitting back and copying everything they have seen on TV/movies without asking "Is this stupid?". Almost all of them are plagiarists/copy monkies who do not think at all.

    Then there is the target audience who will love the dumbest shit if it is packed full of contrived artificial drama Drama DRAMA!!!! "Thanks for fucking us like this "reality" TV!!"

    Then there are terrible directors. The people who demand garbage and bad acting... and explosions. Sorry, Mr Bay.. no I'm not.

    All that said, a writers strike is probably the best thing that can happen to TV and movies right now.
    Let Joss and those like him crank out some quality web content while they wait for the strike to end.
    A few indies will pop up and get great careers out of this.

    So the 3-4 good shows we watch are delayed, so what? The last season of Game of Thrones seemed to be in a Hollywood nose dive with dead characters returning from the dead (I guess they ran out of books and handed it over to the "writers"). The Archer people need a break to recoup and drink some mojitos, judging from the Magnum PI season. This down time is a plus not a minus. They should do this every five or so years.

  28. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All episodes already in the can (so to speak), so no worries. Let'em strike!
    The Hollywood fat cats need to loosen the purse strings and pay these folks appropriately.

  29. TV IS DEAD by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Traditional TV is dead as a door nail. the programs are so sparse and aimed at dullards that anyone with a nickel in their pocket is on cable or satelite with premium channels added. Regular TV programing went into the ditch when too many ads were run making the shows a nightmare to watch. As viewers declined the programming got worse and they ran ever more ads. Greed killed TV and it isn't doing much for theaters either.

    1. Re:TV IS DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable and satellite TV is AWFUL. It's the most abominable trash that has ever been created.

      The ONLY shows worth watching are broadcast ones and Netflix originals. Everything on cable is for people who actually ARE Honey Boo Boo (however you spell that) clones.

    2. Re:TV IS DEAD by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On top of that, Cable and satellite TV is EXPENSIVE. "Anyone with a nickel in their pocket"? - more like "anyone with a couple of extra Benjamins in their wallet".

      If they piped that crap into my home for free I wouldn't watch it. It amazes me the amount of money people actually pay for it.

  30. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Who cares, most "real" shows are going into summer reruns here soon if not already.

    TWD is off till next Oct, etc....

    Not much new content to watch in summer anyway, so, let them strike.

    You do realise it takes quite a while to make a scripted TV show, right? A strike now will make itself felt a lot later in the year.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  31. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by negRo_slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who cares if any if it ever comes back? So much to see and do in this world the last thing worthy of consideration is whether these glorified advertising vectors air with 20 minutes of "new" content. Listen to podcasts, read a book, watch the thousands and thousands of hours of already released content, play the latest vidya, watch YouTube, go to the park, fly a kite, take a picture every day, play with your kids, tend to a garden, learn something new, volunteer somewhere, go talk to your neighbor, go fishing, go bird watching, lose ten pounds, write the next great app, call your mom, get high, change your own oil, ask your significant other how they feel, go watch the ballet, go protest something in front if city hall, better yet run for mayor, get a penpal, pick up litter, listen to the radio, go geocaching, write a short story, hell write a book, paint a picture, ride a bike, clean your ears, pet you pet, learn origami, shitpost on slashdot. But for the love of God don't worry about television.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  32. Wrong move for the writers by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    They'll get pretty well zero sympathy from anyone who has any power to improve their situation. The government is still overrun by people drunk on power from November and looking for a chance to attack the unions. If they want to keep their jobs they'll have to tough it out at least until the current administration falls apart - though that may well not be far into the future.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  33. who cares by Revek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm not trolling but I couldn't care less about it. If they strike and shows don't get made it will have little or no impact on my time. Its all just empty filler where you're real life should go.

    1. Re:who cares by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      But my life is just useless filter to where an unconscious eternity will go, I need entertainment to distract myself from that fact.

  34. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Who cares, most "real" shows are going into summer reruns here soon if not already.

    Right, because they're getting started with pilots and writing season now. This is how there are shows in fall. They are filmed and edited in advance.

  35. Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replied to a FP troll to be unburyable. What a douche.

  36. flag on the play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is mandatory that all cord-cutter threads start with that 17-year-old Onion article

    Karma from point of post deducted

  37. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not much new content to watch in summer anyway, so, let them strike. ....
    Summers on TV are great now, not like when we were kids.

    Exactly. Whoever is striking can go fuck themselves. Hell they should probably stop writing. There is way too much trash on TV as it is. Also you missed Rick and Morty as well as Expanse (pretty epic if you are into it). Which reminds me, I missed the last episode ;)

  38. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by chipschap · · Score: 1

    One of the most insightful and wise /. posts ever.

    Was there a writer's strike in 2009? I didn't notice. I won't notice this time.

    Life is too full of great things to worry about television, as so brilliantly described above.

  39. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Right, because they're getting started with pilots and writing season now. This is how there are shows in fall. They are filmed and edited in advance.

    I would think most of the writing of those fall shows had already taken place by now and were in the can...mostly ready for shooting....?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  40. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -Doctor Who

    You think the Writer's Guild of America is going to affect that show a lot, do you?

  41. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by OlRickDawson · · Score: 1

    Since Doctor Who is a British show, I don't think it would affected by this strike.

    --
    Ol' Rick Dawson had a farm EIEIO
  42. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    I'll reply to you, since everyone else with the same reply is AC...I'm replying to the first half of OP's comment, not the second half.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  43. Only a Handful of Good Writers by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    Most need to be shown the door, not a higher paycheck. Especially those from network TV. Fire them all. Replace them with starving book writers.

  44. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I threw out the telly about 15 years ago, on the simple grounds that a 4:3 21" just didn't cut it anymore, and there simply wasn't anything interesting enough on anyway for me to schedule my life around it.

    Never had any regrets. Television is for angstfilled people who don't know what to do with their lives and just need something to fill it with.

  45. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Netflix and Amazon series writers are all the same union as the broadcast nets. So it's more likely the new kids would look to license (more) archive material from the older networks, as the oldsters have a much deeper inventory. If recent Netflix and Amazon original shows make their way to the broadcasters more rapidly, the value of Netflix and Amazon original content to the consumer diminishes greatly.

  46. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    One of the most insightful and wise /. posts ever.

    Was there a writer's strike in 2009? I didn't notice.

    Certainly. That season was full of sitcoms, reality shows, and half-baked plots. Prior to that, TV was, er, sitcoms, reality shows, and half-baked plots. Hmm.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  47. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh. To counter your examples, here's a list of the things I've enjoyed watching recently:

    - Star Trek: TNG
    - Star Trek: DS9
    - a few minutes of Star Trek: Voyager until I threw up a little in my mouth
    - metric tons of Blue Bloods reruns
    - even more Big Bang Theory reruns than Blue Bloods reruns
    - Emergency, until they rotated it off the all-reruns-all-the-time channels
    - Leverage, also until they took it out of rotation
    - Burn Notice
    - Psych

    Notice how many of these are current shows? Yeah, just two, and I'm mostly watching reruns of those anyway.

    So a writer's strike is going to interrupt my enjoyment of these shows by approximately... not at all. (And, yes, a good portion of this is from Ion Television, MeTV, H&I, and other similar second-string DTV channels that I get for free. Netflix can go take a flying leap with the cable TV hucksters for all I care.)

  48. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riiiiiiight, and those shows are written, filmed and edited right before they go on the air. No up-front work has to be done with writing scipts, since those pretty much write themselves, huh?

  49. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by WrongMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The big difference is that Netflix and Amazon don't rely on advertisers that expect an established release schedule for new material. If writers go on strike for a month or two, then Netflix and Amazon can postpone production for a month or two and suffer no loss real losses. If ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, etc. don't release new programs for a month or two, they lose revenue from those adverts.

  50. The Strike is a ReRun by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    We've already been here - and the networks without writers gave birth to the abomination known as "reality TV".
    But really, I don't watch much TV. Seasons are down to like 6 episodes, you can't even get drawn into characters or plots in that little time. Then it takes so long for the next "season", I just forget about it and watch something else on Netflix.

  51. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by gnick · · Score: 2

    Was there a writer's strike in 2009? I didn't notice.

    You didn't notice? The last writers' strike gave us Dr Horrible's Sing-Along Blog. That was a win in my book.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  52. Hollywood writers? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I always thought that crap's been generated by not too sophisticated Perl script.

    1. Re:Hollywood writers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblig XKCD, perl is how god created the world: https://xkcd.com/224/

  53. Just means more time for Football by tdillo · · Score: 1

    Sure the ol'lady might be upset when the new season of "Spin Off III : Reno SND" doesn't premier till December but hey, that just means more time for Football, NASCAR, and Monster Trucks. None of that fancy script writing required.

  54. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot, do you think television shows are just source code, and you hit 'compile', wait a few minutes, then upload the result for broadcast? They have to produce the content, you moron, when do you think that gets done for the Fall premieres?

  55. TV was having a golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured TV was pretty much dead, I never hear anyone talk about any TV shows currently airing, only stuff one can check out on Netflix (or Amazon Prime). I've sought my visual entertainment from other countries because I feel that American writers, producers, and even animators just can't make anything good anymore. And if they do, it's too far and too few.

  56. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

    Netflix and Amazon series writers are all the same union as the broadcast nets. So it's more likely the new kids would look to license (more) archive material from the older networks, as the oldsters have a much deeper inventory. If recent Netflix and Amazon original shows make their way to the broadcasters more rapidly, the value of Netflix and Amazon original content to the consumer diminishes greatly.

    Probably won't affect Netflix, Amazon, or Hulu. Their contracts are not broadcast contracts like ABC, NBC, CBS, etc have. I would expect they have their own streaming contracts, and Netflix at least is known for offering better deals than Hollywood and the Broadcasters when it comes to making their original content. Joint-Developed content, however, might suffer though.

    The irony is that it may prevent them from licensing material to the broadcasters though.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  57. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure thing, buddy. I work 40 hours a week (plus travel time), then train for bike racing (and race) anywhere from 7 to 15 hours a week (or more). Watching a show or two on the DVR is my 'downtime', and I usually sit and eat a meal while I'm doing so. Reading is done in bed to relax me before going to sleep at night. Other needful things are done when I have time to do so. But sure, I'll just stare at the wall while I'm eating dinner, and have nothing to say to anyone because there's no input whatsoever other than work of one kind or another. I'll be sure to invite you to the funeral for after I blow my head off from boredom and depression because some fuckwit decided visual entertainment isn't worth anyones' time. Say, would you do us all a favor, and not decide things for anyone other than yourself? KTHXBYE.

  58. Re:Gay by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    think it would be quite amusing to watch the whole broadcast model just implode.

    You would, would you? So, you're going to pay for my streaming accounts, and a better computer that'll actually run 1080p content, all because you want to make obsolete the antenna I put on my roof when I cancelled cable TV years and years ago? Thanks so much, corporate America appreciates you voting for them making even more money, charging for streaming ***AND*** making people watch commercials, too. Really appreciate that.

  59. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do us a real favor and help us all to stop people parroting the tired illusion of mandates. By not doing it.

    I'm already doing you a favor: I'm interpreting your angle as someone rebuking an (implied) imperative, rather than someone playing victim.

    Tune in next week when I angst at someone butchering the meaning of the phrase "excuse me" with their entitlement. You know it's time to pull the plug when six-year-olds are snubbing it: "You're excused."

  60. Re:Gay by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Whether I want it or not, I believe that both cable and broadcast over antenna are not going to survive forever. They are simply obsolete. They won't disappear overnight.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  61. TV's Golden Age is Long Long Over by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    the Golden Age of TV was in the 1960's & 1970's (before the internet) when most everybody spent their free time in the evening watching their favorite TV shows before bed time, TV is like the Radio now, people mostly ignore it unless they want local news & weather, the internet wont lill TV, like TV did not kill radio, it will just fall back to a secondary source of entertainment and news and information

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  62. Re:Gay by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    OTA television and radio will always exist because of federal government mandate, and rightly so. They exist so people at any income level can have access to television and radio, because they're information sources. There's even a federal law that says you can't outlaw antennas on people's homes, for the same reason. Your 'belief' is misguided and also technically incorrect.

  63. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >stare at the wall while I'm eating dinner
    C'mon, you're a big kid now, you don't need us to pick out the matching examples in his relatively tiny list of spoon feed.

    Ugh, fine. Here comes the airplane!
    Zoooom~! >released content
    Pshooo~! >youtube

  64. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Writing season is about now. Shooting typically starts in summer, while writing continues on later episodes. Even when shows begin airing in the fall, they likely don't have all the episodes in post-production yet or even finished filming.

  65. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rick and Morty. Just discovered this gem (i know, third season). While it won't me to get cable, I will surely pay to watch it on Amazon instead of finding it via, uh, other means.

  66. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    The longer a strike goes, the more people will stream old stuff, watch YouTube, look on Facebook, or maybe even, and I know this strikes fear: go outside or read an actual paper book.

    I'm not anti-union, but I'm firmly anti-Hollywood and it's time to poke a few holes in their balloons, this being one of them.

    Yeah, go ahead and strike.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  67. Shut it down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

  68. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Vincent: Pilot? What's a pilot?

    Jules: Well, you know the shows on TV?

    Vincent: I don't watch TV.

    Jules: Yeah, but, you are aware that there's an invention called television, and on this invention they show shows, right?

    Vincent: Yeah.

    Jules: Well, the way they pick TV shows is, they make one show. That show's called a pilot. Then they show that one show to the people who pick shows, and on the strength of that one show they decide if they want to make more shows. Some get chosen and become television programs. Some don't, become nothing. She starred in one of the ones that became nothing.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  69. Re:Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They exist so people at any income level can have access to television and radio, because they're information sources.

    Maybe some of the various PBS programs, but really, not much else is an "information" source on TV.

  70. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
  71. Go ahead and strike! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    It's not like the Writer's Guild has actually done anything worth a shit since their last strike (which got Heroes well-fucked.) Even most Anime has more substance than 99% of the shit Hollywood has had its writers putting out in this day and age.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  72. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll reply to you, since everyone else with the same reply is AC...I'm replying to the first half of OP's comment, not the second half.

    "Everyone else" = one comment? Technically true, but....

  73. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by mea2214 · · Score: 1

    Enough with your anti-television talk. Why do you hate America?

  74. Television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year was the rise of the reality game shows and social 'experiment' shows. Reality games shows follow a simple game show format but are conducted in a workshop (frequently a stage) or the 'real world'. Social 'experiments' shows people put in highly personal situations with slightly odd circumstances: kissing unseen strangers, marrying total strangers, blind dates, naked 2-day dates. The strangest is watching people at home watching the same reality shows.

    I noticed the most popular, a cooking contest, spent more air time on contestants bitching than the challenge at hand. Here, Tv consists of those unscripted shows and re-runs from years and even decades ago, although the 1960s shows have been retired. A few days ago, the annual viewing summary was released: The shows most watched don't suffer scripts and royalty fees. I find bitching about people, boring; I want a goal, a resolution (good or bad) and most of all, a narrative about the people involved. There's always a few shows which provide that, good television isn't gone; it's just not advertised by the networks.

  75. Re:Gay by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    News programs, dummy, all the networks have news departments, and most local stations (except the tiniest of them) have local news departments and broadcasts; broadcast TV and radio has a responsibility to serve the public. Also things like State of the Union addresses, emergency broadcasts, etc. Go research the subject before you stick your foot in your mouth like that.

  76. Streaming and other nations by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Other english speaking nations could see an influx of US support and interest.
    Sharks, history, food shows? Lifestyle shows on building homes, restoring cars?
    A US presenter who lives in that nation and has no need to return to the USA. Good US voice, local connections.
    How real can any part of Canada feel for a US crime, medical show or other drama?
    How many US actors in Canada can hold a well written show together?
    Will US advertisers accept any content between their ads? Will people in the US pay to watch people in Canada trying to be 1800 or 1980's or 2018 USA?
    How many US actors would be needed for a new Canadian created drama, that looks 100% made in the USA for the US market?
    Is digital work that expensive for a few skylines? Would other nations match funding just to get a production going and support new jobs for their workers and authors?
    US writers should have ensured their content was out of reach in any other nation by ensuring more difficult to clone US only content.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  77. So what? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    Go ahead and strike, we don't really give a shit.

    Doctors, firefighters, police, people that build and fix things...if they go on strike, we care. They actually do things that matter.

    But a bunch of Hollywood script writers threatening to go on strike? Who gives a fuck?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  78. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    You do realise it takes quite a while to make a scripted TV show, right? A strike now will make itself felt a lot later in the year.

    I don't care if they go on strike and stay that way for the next decade. Really.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  79. Is that you, Area Man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a serious comment? You're not just paraphrasing the Onion? Because you sound an awful lot like this

  80. Rectummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That got your attention, didn't it?

  81. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TWD?

    Twerking with Dogs?
    Toshiba Waving Diorama?
    Till we Dance?
    Tahiti Wave Drama?
    Toronto Wine and Dine?

  82. Re:Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most/All new Netflix and HBO programs are produced under WGA; so this strike will kill those too.

    So crazy how many people proclaim 'I don't watch that crap' only to go on about premium services which will also be completely shut down by a writers strike. I'm not sure where this idea that it only affects the broadcast networks comes from; but the vast majority of the non-reality productions will shut down immediately putting thousands of people who have nothing to do with the writing (including myself) out of work.

    Cheers!

  83. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most/All new Netflix, Amazon and Hulu programs are produced under WGA; so this strike will kill production on those too (google New Media WGA and you can read about it yourself).

    So crazy how many people proclaim 'I don't watch that crap' only to go on about premium services which will also be completely shut down by a writers strike. I'm not sure where this idea that it only affects the broadcast networks comes from; but the vast majority of the non-reality productions will shut down immediately putting thousands of people who have nothing to do with the writing (including myself) out of work.

  84. Public sector unions should be illegal. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Correct. Public sector unions should be ILLEGAL. There is really no rational argument for them at all.

    They already have a direct say in their employer, its called VOTING.

    The worst part is just before elections, where the public sector unions pour tons of their own members
    money into political parties, while at the same time trying their best to make their pay an election 'issue'.

    If you want a union, work in the private sector. Believe me, its a very different world out here.

  85. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    TWD is off till next Oct, etc....

    The Walking Dead has writers? I thought someone just shit on a bit of paper and they worked from that. And then passed it on to the Game of Thrones people.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  86. Just one more year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't watch much TV; I don't even own one. But I really enjoy Game of Thrones and I hope it gets finished. It's one of the few book-to-screen adaptations that's really good. Besides, at the rate GRRM writes I think either he or I will die before the book gets completed and I'd like to know how the story ends.

    After that, the whole TV/Film/Streaming medium can die in a fire for all I care.

  87. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    When they strike now, what do you think will air in autumn? Stuff has to be written, then shot, edited and then broadcasted. If nothing is written today, then sometime in autumn there is nothing to broadcast anymore and your summer reruns become all year reruns into summer 2018.

    I guess they'll have to go to remakes, reboots and generic crap....oh wait.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  88. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    But sure, I'll just stare at the wall while I'm eating dinner, and have nothing to say to anyone because there's no input whatsoever other than work of one kind or another.

    I'm going to give you one word that will blow your mind...

    Music

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  89. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Most/All new Netflix, Amazon and Hulu programs are produced under WGA;

    I cannot for the life of me figure out what the World Canadian Bureau have to do with all this.

    Do the writers want more munneh? Maybe some of that internet munneh?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  90. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Riiiiiiight, and those shows are written, filmed and edited right before they go on the air. No up-front work has to be done with writing scipts, since those pretty much write themselves, huh?

    Considering how I finally had to stop watching TWD this season, it sometimes sure seems like it.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  91. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Sorry but Dr Who? It's a BBC (UK) show largely written by British Writers working in the UK how is an American Writers Strike going to affect it?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  92. Yes! by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Yes! Please!

    Let it fail! TV is a time-suck disaster anyway, and it's exactly what the industry needs in order to shake up some more and slough off viewers.

    The more down-time from the boob tube the better.

    --
    -
  93. No more reality? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    No more reality TV?

    As if that's not scripted.

    Let 'em strike. When they do sign, no more using old crap. Top of the list - Police/private dick murder show. Don't we already have way too many of these?

    I have hundreds of channels and with a handful of exceptions - still NOTHING worth watching.

  94. Strike? Grumpy Cat says "GOOD!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them strike and then they'll realize nobody really cares.

    On the other hand, be prepared for more minimally-scripted "reality shows".

  95. Re:Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anywa by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    But production of those upcoming fall shows happens during the summer. If there is a strike for a significant amount of time, the fall premieres will be delayed.

  96. What are the real issues? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    This article doesn't talk much about the basic issues that are pushing the writers toward a strike. A big driving force is that they are making less money because of the shorter seasons on cable and streaming; people are only getting paid for 10 or 12 episodes instead of 22, and that means a big pay cut. Often they are still tied down by exclusivity agreements, which means that they can't make up for the shorter season by doing some work for another show. So there is more work for writers because more shows are being made, but at the same time it's becoming more difficult to make a good living at it.

    That's one thing that a new Writers Guild contract could improve, by mandating a relationship between season length and the length of exclusive commitment that can be associated with it. So, for example, a writer who does a 10 or 12 episode season for one show might be allowed to do a second 10 episode show or pick up some individual episodes on other shows, while a writer who does a 22 episode show could be required to be exclusive for the entire year.

  97. Re:Gay by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Can the government really mandate that radio and TV stations stay in business even as their business model implodes? I thought that TV stations were a business to make profit. They applied for an FCC license. In order to get it, they were mandated to have a certain amount of news and information. Doesn't their license expire periodically and need to be renewed? What if a TV station decided not to renew and shut down? I don't claim to deeply understand that industry. I would love to be corrected and add to my understanding.

    The government doesn't mandate restaurants into existence.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  98. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    Oh, get off your high horse. I have no great fondness for television. I rarely watch it, except in social situations - and only then if the other people in the room are actually paying attention to it. But no moral points are awarded for dismissing it.

    I've seen television programs that are excellent works of art, just as I've read books that were inane wastes of paper. I've gone to parks and flown kites and taken pictures and played with children. I've knapped flint and painted houses and carved antler and plumbed bathrooms and written poetry. All of these can be worthwhile activities, and with some effort any of them can be rendered trite, dull, and meaningless, too.

    Some people care about television programming and the writers' strike, just as some people care about professional sports, or the declining number of speakers of Gaelic, or space exploration. That is not a personal failing on their part, and exhorting them not to care only demonstrates a narrowness in your conception of human existence. And the same goes for your cheerleaders below.

  99. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    I'm going to give you one word that will blow your mind...

    ... it is the thing that I like, and everyone else will like it too, because everyone is the same as me.

  100. Ah, the nobility! by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    So many brave refusniks telling everyone else how much better their television-less lives are! Truly, Slashdot is the locus of enlightenment.

  101. Re:Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure what to make of your subject line.

    With a name like yours, I'm surprised by that.

  102. Re:Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're talking about writers here, with current tv shows, and cable companies trying to make profit off them - if cable and antenna completely died outside of news stations, it'd be 'dead' in the sense he talked about - you're nitpicking.

  103. Re: Who cares....its almost summer rerun time anyw by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    No, but it an the alternative to TV and silence. If this guy can't think to do anything but stare at the wall in silence and misery if he doesn't have new shows to watch then he needs all the help he can get.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  104. whatever by stolidobserver · · Score: 1

    Given the profundity of gay and tranny scenes, the ridiculous interracial couples, etc, I don't really give a shidt what they do. Maybe keep your social engineering plans to yourselves A-HOLES!

  105. Go right ahead, strike for as long as you want by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    It would be impossible for me to care any less. I very rarely watch TV shows or movies, and when I do, it's usually because someone else wants to watch it.

  106. Ugh by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    The last time this happened, the average TV season went from 22 episodes per year to 11. A few more iterations and we'll have to measure it in years-per-episode.