Slashdot Mirror


No, Millennials Aren't a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flakes (fastcompany.com)

From a report: Today, Pew researchers published findings that refute yet another stereotype about millennials that actual millennials find infuriating: the idea that they're job-hopping more often than other generations. According to Pew's analysis of recent government data, "college-educated millennials are sticking with their jobs longer than their Gen X counterparts."

214 comments

  1. I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they all worked at Starbucks.

  2. Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the scourge of the world! To think they just want to get at least as far as their old man got! The horror!

    1. Re: Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the dog n squarl is an idea and means easilly distracted

      SQUARL!

    2. Re:Millennials by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That sense of entitlement is stunning, isn't it?

      Be a dear, pass the caviar, and ring for the bus boy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. No so many jobs to hop to by gatkinso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suspect this is the driving factor.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:No so many jobs to hop to by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      I suspect this is the driving factor.

      That was self evident to me. They're not loyal to their employers because their employers are great and worthy of their time. They don't have options, so they cling to what they can get. In two other millennial stories appearing today and not being featured on Slashdot; millennials can't afford the world their parents have made for themselves, so they're still mostly at home, wondering who pulled up the ladder. As such, their prolonged childhood continues.

      And if your knee jerks up and smacks into your chin with a "uneducated plebs and their sense of entitlement" view, you should think about who we have for a president now and how well your indifference is working out for you. You can't actually shit on a whole class of voters forever without consequence until you take away their vote.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:No so many jobs to hop to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if your knee jerks up and smacks into your chin with a "uneducated plebs and their sense of entitlement" view, you should think about who we have for a president now and how well your indifference is working out for you. You can't actually shit on a whole class of voters forever without consequence until you take away their vote.

      Unless that class of voters is too busy struggling to makes ends meet to have time to deliver those consequences... which is exactly what the incompetent asshat in the oval office is trying to take advantage of.

  4. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    You forgot to add "get off my lawn!".

    On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho?

    --
    Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
  5. Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just in.. Pew Researchers find out yet another stereotype only applies to a small percentage of the group. I can't wait to see the non-millennial minds blown when they conduct more research and find out the following: - Millennials are mutli-racial despite being portrayed as upper middle class and white - Millennial work ethics vary greatly - Some are hard workers and others are not - Millennial spending habits are all over the map - Some are savers and some are spenders - Some Millennials voted for Trump (GASP) Every generation is different.. I just hope one outright identifier of our generation is our acknowledgement of our differences and ability to cultivate a society where our differences are respected. In other words, be more specific when trying to identify trends across groups of people.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true.

      Except for the Baby boomer generation; those are all assholes.

    2. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      This just in, Pew is a right-wing think tank that no one should ever listen to because if they are right, it's a coincidence. They also claimed that bloggers were not journalists. Well, neither are journalists, any more. Pew can DIAF immediately and posting a link or study from them should come with the same stigma of posting one from Forbes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      The Baby Boomers (aka the hippies) fucked things up. Generation X and Millennials are only now beginning to see that mess cleaned up.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    4. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Millennials already work noticeably harder than we did, which is why they have jobs to hop. At their age, we still prided outselves no having tuned in and dropped out.

      May they build everything that my generation was afraid to build.

    5. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hippies are boomers? News to me

    6. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Don't forget to ask Mommy for your allowance.

    7. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Hippies are boomers? News to me

      I imagine a lot of things are.

    8. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0

      Thanks to millennials, 'Murica is a joke.

      Maybe on that side of the pond, but it wasn't the millennials or generation z that voted for Brexit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow down buddy, you can't give the answers until after you get the grant money.

    10. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      Get out of your dead parent's basement then and stop lurking on slashdot and build a world-view that consists of a sample size higher than yourself.

    11. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Generally when you are young you are more likely to job hop looking for that job that not only pays enough but you also enjoy doing, it doesn't matter which generation you where born in. Most Millennials haven't been in the works force long enough for us to know what their habits will be like but to top it of you can't say a generation of college graduates are sticking with jobs longer since they are only now joining the work force and there is no data for you create that statistic with.

    12. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define what you mean by "Joke".
      If you mean saying "Murica" without being sarcastic, then yes, millenials are to blame for making that into a joke.
      If it means "Being the laughing stock of the rest of the world", then it's whichever generation was responsible for trump.

    13. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Who do you think was flocking to Woodstock? Boomers.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    14. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      A hippie turns into a boomer the moment he moves from cocaine to Rogaine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nah, don't worry, we have been making jokes about you for way longer than Trump's presidency. We ridicule you for your love of guns, for treating Creationism like it's something real, for your generally incredibly low educational standards, your poor healthcare, your pride in democracy despite living in a two-equal-parties dictatorship...

      It's not like we really needed Trump to feel superior to you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY!
          Every group will appear "more random & F'd up" than the last, because the last is now looking from a (hopefully) more stable life.
      Every new generation of people are yet to be saddled with kids, mortgage, professional pressures, inner-reflection & life goal hardenings, etc.
      Even Socrates wrote of it- saying something along the lines of "You elders who are running our city so horribly, you'd rather hear my words & scoldings of your methods, than be the victims of the riots from the youth.".

    17. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were born in the years immediately following WWII (1945-1950) (the baby boom years), you would be a teenager to early twenties during Woodstock, " the definitive nexus for the larger counterculture generation".

      http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/06/us/baby-boomer-generation-fast-facts/
      Baby Boomers

      Born 1946-1964 (Sometimes listed as 1943-1964)

      Captcha: dulled

    18. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      haven't been in the works force long enough

      Millennials, Born 1981-1997, aka GenerationY, are today's 20-36 year olds. I had reached the top of my career path by the time I was 36.

    19. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope one outright identifier of our generation is our acknowledgement of our differences and ability to cultivate a society where our differences are respected.
       
      As a GenX'er I need to ask why do you care? We had the same crap thrown on us by "the older and wiser" when we were your age. It's going to happen and you're not going to stop it. Be a bit stoic and let it go. Any attachment to this misconception isn't going to do anything positive for you.

      If you want respect do respectable things. The people around you will respect you for it. You'll have no luck changing the public at large so worry about those in your own circle of influence if you're going to worry about anything. Don't carry the burden of any demographic on your back. It's not your globe to shoulder.

    20. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      For a clear picture of the economy, it's important to have better data and quantify shit. "Common sense tells me that some millenials don't job hop!" is insufficient. You don't want legislators making retirement policy on an assumption that millenials all do or do not job hop. But at the same time you don't want them making retirement policy saying "Well, every snowflake millenial is different, so we don't really know." You want legislators having hard numbers showing that gen xers and millenials are statistically not different in terms of job duration. And then they'll continue to screw us younger generations over in favor of the greedy boomers, but that's because we don't vote, not because they lack data.

      Yes, I'm aware of the hypocrisy of that last part. Point is, this is not a "Researchers say water is wet" finding, this is necessary quantification. You aren't shocked by the finding? Who cares. We still need to do the damn tests. They're not being done to validate or disprove dumb popular opinions, they're important data for knowing what the fuck is going on with the population.

    21. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Dude - for quite some time we Gen-X'ers were known as the slacker generation, famous for listening to Nirvana in underwear we haven't bothered to change in the past three weeks.
      That was how we were seen. Our great cultural artifacts were Grunge and Trainspotting and KIDS.

      Now as it happens those are all pretty great things, but they were not flattering.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    22. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to come see my workplace if you believe millennials work harder. I see them come in late if they even show up, leave early, and spend most of the time when they are at work texting. They rarely last more than a month before they either quit or get fired, and their replacement repeats the same cycle. If you see millennials working at all, much less working harder, you must be lucky.

    23. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I find it ironic you "ridicule for love of guns" yet with a signature about the Bill of Rights (or lack thereof). Did it never occur to you that a love of guns can be synonymous with a love of the Bill of Rights? Hypocritical much, eh?

    24. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take some responsibility and train them then

    25. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it does, but there's another stereotype in play here; the one where a public love of guns conflates with a public demonstration of anti-government behavior, radical racist action and a lack of knowledge of or indifference to historical fact.

      You can love the Constitution and loath the people who abuse it to justify their own agendas.

    26. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it ironic you "ridicule for love of guns" yet with a signature about the Bill of Rights (or lack thereof). Did it never occur to you that a love of guns can be synonymous with a love of the Bill of Rights? Hypocritical much, eh?

      Also one can "love" guns and yet not want anything to do with creationism and religion while wanting education and healthcare improved. Really gun control has little to do with the later things on that list.

    27. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      it seems like the only part of the Bill of Rights that hasn't been ignored is the Second.

    28. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, as someone else pointed out with real data. However, the thing to understand is that not all boomers were hippies, in fact very very few were. The hippies were a tiny, but vocal minority in the Boomer generation. That's why the overall actions of that generation seem so contrary to hippie values. They never had any political power.

    29. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Honestly, there are plenty of attacks and restrictions on the 2nd. If I were to agree with you it would be because that it is the hardest Right to take away. A physical thing compared to an idea or virtue or process. Compare "they'll take my gun from my cold dead hands" versus when do you have a right of privacy online when using a private company server traversing public/international infrastructure. One is a little easier to understand with much less subtlety and nuance that do not overlap with another Right.

      An interesting read is about the invention/propagation of telephone/telegraph and what the government did with that new technology to stop criminal activity. A lot of similarities to today. It took a while for the courts and the legislatures to apply the Bill of Rights to that new technology (privacy, searches and seizures, etc) but they got there and we formed some good protections to those technologies as I am sure we will eventually understand and apply to modern technologies.

      I am an optimist. So long as the people understand that they have these rights and that they must defend them from all manner of attacks, the government will eventually capitulate because eventually it would be suicidal for a politician to platform degradation of those rights. Although it is becoming harder to understand these rights in conjunction with the other rights we hold dear. (private property of the server, the public access to infrastructure, privacy of the individual, and impartiality of public accommodations) for just one example.

    30. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Where's the irony? If anything it's ironic that the only part of the constitution of the USA that today still has some relevance (unlike, say, the 3rd) that people will defend tooth, nail and claw is also the most irrelevant one: The second.

      Have you noticed how first, fourth and fifth were simply thrown out the window and nobody gave half a shit? These are, by the way, the ones that are most likely going to affect you as a normal citizen. But they were de facto eliminated without any kind of outcry or protest.

      But dare to think about pondering somehow dealing with the second and you find half of the US crying bloody murder.

      And yes, the second amendment has been rendered redundant a long, long while ago. Why do you think your government doesn't bother trying to remove it? You have the right to a gun. Do you think that means that you're by any stretch of imagination a threat to your government or that you can keep it "in check" that way? I hold your gun and raise you an army. Even something like the national guard would be enough to eradicate any kind of opposition you and your buddies could possible represent.

      But that's America for you. Fighting over petty rubbish while simply ignoring the important bits in life. You can argue yourself into hysteria over, say, abortion, gun laws or the origin of the world, but let your government get away with any and all decisions that really matter.

      You people are really the perfect people any dictator could want.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      The irony is that your signature decries the forgotten rights in the BoR yet you want to get rid of one of those rights because you don't like it.

      I will quote myself because I highlighted this in different comments:

      "...A physical thing compared to an idea or virtue or process. Compare "they'll take my gun from my cold dead hands" versus when do you have a right of privacy online when using a private company server traversing public/international infrastructure. One is a little easier to understand with much less subtlety and nuance that do not overlap with another Right.

      An interesting read is about the invention/propagation of telephone/telegraph and what the government did with that new technology to stop criminal activity. A lot of similarities to today. It took a while for the courts and the legislatures to apply the Bill of Rights to that new technology (privacy, searches and seizures, etc) but they got there and we formed some good protections to those technologies as I am sure we will eventually understand and apply to modern technologies. ...it is becoming harder to understand these rights in conjunction with the other rights we hold dear. (private property of the server, the public access to infrastructure, privacy of the individual, and impartiality of public accommodations) for just one example."

      most irrelevant one: The second... . Do you think that means that you're by any stretch of imagination a threat to your government or that you can keep it "in check" that way? I hold your gun and raise you an army.

      You have a very narrow view of what the 2nd is for if you think it is only for holding the government to account. To quote msyelf in a previous comment because lazy.

      "The right of arms is a right of self defense. Guns are a tool to that enables the citizenry to protect themselves from rogue agitators to state aggression. It is a tool that equalizes the odds of any violent encounter regardless of the physical and fighting prowess you or the agitator may have.

      Tyranny does not have to come from the government. A recent is example is the UC Berkly riots where the rioters were beating people up while the police stood idly by. Something thing to consider is when the government does not enforce law and order. An example being the black panthers in California storming the legislature armed to protest gun control measures and to protest the governments inaction in their communities that was plagued by violence and crime. Guns make any protest to be taken serious and forces the government to acknowledge or respond.

      The right of arms means that even if rhetoric gets out of hand, those "protesters" have to understand fully that if they advocate violence ("this is a war" Berkly riots), that they will have to be willing to put their lives on the line instead of hiding behind group think, propaganda (narrative crafting from news/government), and a complicit government allowing such riots to occur by not breaking them up when they turned violent.

      If you are the receiving end of those protests or rhetoric and the government is complicit with those aggressions, the right of arms gives individual citizens the ability to defend themselves from mob justice and police inaction. Every group has to think twice about making another group the scapegoat of their violence because everyone can defend themselves regardless what the government does."

      You people are really the perfect people any dictator could want.

      How is that different than any other people on earth?

    32. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Saw this and thought it was pertinent to my point. Kind of fucked up if you ask me that the police disarm the Trump/freespeech rally people and then stand idly by as antifa riot and beat people up. How would you solve this kind of violence and complicity of the government?

      https://wearechange.org/berkel...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  6. They're a whole lot more than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're whiny, self-entitled, arrogant, clueless job-hopping flakes who can't find their own genitals without using their cellphone.

    "Compared to gen X"? Is it even possible to find a lower standard - outside of millennials?

    1. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Baby Boomers!

    2. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's been bitten by the jealousy bug...

    3. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Someone's been bitten by the jealousy bug...

      I'm not jealous. I feel sorry for the Millennials, as they will have to work and pay more in taxes to support all the retired baby boomers that will outnumber the workers paying taxes.

    4. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And with good reason. Boomers are the generations that had it all. What's not to be jealous for?

      I myself am a GenX. And I sure as fuck don't envy Millennials. Boomers are retiring, and we're fewer than they were, so we will probably (maybe...) have a job 'til retirement. And with a bit of luck there will even be money left for us to enjoy our retirement.

      The Millennials get to pay the bill for it. Because they again are a pretty strong cohort with fewer jobs to go around, lots of debt weighing down their back, shitty jobs ("generation internship") ahead of them and retirement possibilities being at best a wet dream.

      If I were them, I'd simply nuke the shit and hope that I'll survive the reboot. Because the way it is, they sure are the altar boy in a catholic seminar. No matter what they do, they'll get fucked.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with holding one job for too long in IT Support is that you make less money with 2% raises over time than someone who has short-term contracts at different companies. I ran into an old coworker a few years ago during a job interview. He was still making the same kind of money that I made when we worked together 10+ years ago, but the company wanted to pay me 40% more for doing the same work. Fortunately, I had three job offers to pick from and went for the higher offer from a contracting agency.

    1. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must be making a lot of money. You are getting 40% more than him? You must be making at least $200k?

    2. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      You might think it's funny but he is not wrong. When I was coming up in my career I would get 2-3% raises for promotions and maybe 1-2% (if anything) annually. Finding a new job was typically 10-15% bump in salary. Why would anyone stay at one company when they are rising up the ranks?

    3. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be making a lot of money. You are getting 40% more than him? You must be making at least $200k?

      I make $50K+ per year, as you damn well know. Keep in mind that this is IT Support. Level entry jobs can start at $10 per hour (minimum wage) without benefits in Silicon Valley. Not everyone in Silicon Valley is a newly minted millionaire or billionaire.

    4. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      So since you were offered 40% more than the other guy, the other guy must be making ~$30k max? In IT support?

    5. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So since you were offered 40% more than the other guy, the other guy must be making ~$30k max? In IT support?

      Correct.

    6. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just IT. I'm a physicist who worked at the same defense contractor for 14 years - 2-3% raises all the way. Left that company for an immediate 15% bump, plus 5% at the end of year one. Then two more years of 2-3%. Left there for yet another company for an immediate 10% bump (plus signing bonus of 10% of my pay), plus 5% at end of year one. I talk to coworkers at my old company, and I'm making 30% more for essentially the same work. Irony points - I'm in talks now to go back to the first company at a 10-15% bump.

    7. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This. And this is also the reason why I switch jobs quite often. Money is in switching, not staying.

      What can you hope for in the same company? At best, maybe 2, maybe even 3 percent more. Usually at best inflation compensation. Which gets promptly eaten by tax due to our progressive tax system. Switch jobs and you can look at 10, maybe 20 percent more. Provided you're good at what you're doing and you're not, say, Ruby on Rails developer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      It happens - not everyone lives (or wants to live) in California/NY/LA/etc and/or can find a nice high-paying position right away.

      Job before this one, I was making ~$29k in sort of a tier 1 + 2 combo help desk position - yeah, the pay sucked by most standards, but it was enough to let me make a move and get established in a nicer area with lower cost of living, so the sacrifice was worth it till I found something better a few years ago.

    9. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you taking into account benefits? Sick time. Vacation time. Employer matching 401k.The peace of mind that comes with stability.

    10. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Are you taking into account benefits? Sick time. Vacation time. Employer matching 401k.The peace of mind that comes with stability.

      That particular employer wasn't offering benefits to IT workers. Plus they ran their IT department ass backwards. No anti-virus scanner installed, so virus outbreaks were quite common whenever someone accessed a currency exchange website. All viruses must be removed manually. Reimaging was the absolute last resort. And then there was the HP laptops...

    11. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by ranton · · Score: 1

      Are you taking into account benefits? Sick time. Vacation time. Employer matching 401k.The peace of mind that comes with stability.

      You still get all of those benefits when you move between companies. If you're in demand enough to bounce between companies, you can negotiate for more PTO. I have been at my company for 2 years and I have the same PTO than my counterpart with 14 years seniority only because I negotiated to get the 5 extra days you get with 10 years experience up front.

      And the piece of mind of knowing you can easily find another job with similar pay is much better than the illusion that seniority will save you from layoffs.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    12. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're serious and an idiot or trolling and they are idiots.

    13. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm trolling the trolls. Not sure what 110010001000 is doing. ;)

  8. Re:Except by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    To suggest that they job hop suggests that they have a job and aren't living at home in Mom's basement posting on Slashdot all day.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  9. It's almost like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... you can't lump people into convenient stereotypes based on ! Shit we needed a study for that?!

  10. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Millennials actually seem to be quite conservative in terms of the financial risks they are willing to take. Not that surprising, they have been royally fucked by the Boomers and are facing some huge problems coming down the line (paying Boomer's pensions/healthcare, severe environmental problems and disorderly transition, student loans reaching critical mass etc.)

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. The actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the actual article:

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/19/millennials-arent-job-hopping-any-faster-than-generation-x-did/

  12. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! You need to move to Russia.

  13. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    You must be kidding. No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare crises when planning their daily budget. No one. And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

  14. Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    I say this as a Gen-Xer.

    My parents were in careers where you could reasonably be expected to work in the same company all your life. but things are different now. Not sure if the job market is more turbulent, or attitudes have changed. Perhaps this is a result of changes in corporate culture, or faster moving technology resulting in a lot of companies expanding, contracting, forming and collapsing. I get the impression that it was a similar situation for workers during the industrial revolution as well.

    And companies are part of this change. If a department needs a new manager; they might consider hiring from the lower rank, but they're just as likely, if not more, to advertise from outside.

    1. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your parents were working for companies run by the greatest generation.

      Gen X'ers worked for companies run by your parents. See the connection?

      Now that Gen X is running the show, what is left seems to be more stable.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re: Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of my parents was s gov worker in management 5 years give or take as a rule within agencies but with gov. they are baby boomers.

    3. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm gen-x as well, our parents could do so because the job market was stable. There wasn't the issues with having your job outsourced to some 3rd party TFW or H1B because companies abuse it. These days? Pretty much everyone has those problems. The more specialized your job the higher the risk that some bean counter will tell management that you can be dumped for someone who costs 1/3 while farming out your specialized training to x company who will save them a ton of money(but ends up costing them more).

      In my grandfather's day, he could quit a job at 8am and have a new job by 10am on the same day. He was a skilled tradesman. If you're a skilled tradesman you can do that today as well, there are far more jobs out there for pretty much every trade that you can pick and choose. And some companies go to absurd lengths to bring you in, even in a non-union shop. For example, the local big truck company here is offering $5k/signing, $15k tool allowance yearly, and 3.5x OT pay over 60/hr week, with double time at the 41-59hr range.

      Really, a lot of people who are having problems finding a job, could likely do well in that. Or drive trucks for a while, which has a faster pickup after training. 4yrs is a long time as an apprentice, and the wages you're paid those 4yrs aren't enough to keep you fed, housed, and if you have any type of family? Not a chance. I was paid $2.25/hr(min wage was $6.80) the first 3 years as a mechanics apprentice in the 90's. It's $10.50ish now, but your pay rate is around $5.85/hr for the first year. The demand is so high for drivers in this area that you get an "automatic 200hrs" and insurance qualification from a written multiple choice exam. That's not even starting on the stuff they use to try luring people to them. Free satellite TV, free internet, monthly stipends of $700/food, $3k signing bonuses. I've even seen a few who will hire and pay your drivers training(usually at a good school which includes a skid course) if you agree to contractually stay with the company for 2yrs.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parents were working for companies run by the greatest generation.

      Gen X'ers worked for companies run by your parents. See the connection?

      Now that Gen X is running the show, what is left seems to be more stable.

      No, comrade, it is that imperialist capitalist company-runners are more focused than ever on profit profit profit, so they will show no loyalty to employees, will fire half the company overnight, and refuse to pay for employee training.

    5. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by jeff4747 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My parents were in careers where you could reasonably be expected to work in the same company all your life

      Your (our) parents worked for companies that cared about employees. Layoffs were a last resort. New technology? Time to send some employees to get some training on that technology. And so on. The result was loyal employees, low hiring costs and massive institutional memory which made the company far more effective in the long run.

      Then the long run became less important. Executive compensation moved from primarily salary with some bonuses/options to primarily bonuses/options with some salary. A big layoff would result in a large pile of cash because of how it could goose one quarter's results, even if it hurt the company in the long run. "Personnel" was replaced with "Human Resources". Training budgets became "waste" instead of a good investment. Same with the "R" in R&D. Employees were now lazy moochers taking away from the bottom line, instead of the people who actually create that bottom line.

      Employees responded to this in the entirely logical way: if the company doesn't give a damn about the employees, the employees aren't going to give a damn about the company. And changing jobs every 3-5 years brought in larger raises than staying put.

      Moving back to the old paradigm would require a massive philosophical change in the executive suite. So it's not going to happen any time soon.

    6. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      My father worked in one job for his whole life. My mom had a total of three (mostly because of pregnancies). I had 8 so far. And counting. I'm probably about at half time for my total working years.

      Companies today keep reorganizing constantly, something that was pretty much unheard of two or three decades ago. That means people get laid off, people get hired, people get switched around, people get moved to other companies in mergers where they might not like the company culture and quit...

      Now add that leaps in salary ONLY happen when you switch jobs and you know why people keep hopping. I just calculated it, if I stayed in my first job that I actually had for a whooping 5 years, I would now earn about 60% of my actual salary.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they will show no loyalty to employees, will fire half the company overnight, and refuse to pay for employee training.

      This is engrained in the minds of GenX: Milkin, Boeski, yuppies, junk bonds, corporate raiding (watch Monty Python 1983's Meaning of Life), security violations, Savings and Loans.

    8. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      I'm not necessarily saying this is a bad thing. Job flexibility has its benefits, after all. But there is certainly a quid pro quo here. The employee's loyalty is a reflection of the company's loyalty.

    9. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Khashishi · · Score: 2

      And changing jobs every 3-5 years brought in larger raises than staying put.

      Bingo. If companies cared about retaining employees, they would give them more than inflation-level raises.

    10. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And changing jobs every 3-5 years brought in larger raises than staying put.

      Bingo. If companies cared about retaining employees, they would give them more than inflation-level raises.

      Hell, I would be EXTREMELY happy just to have raises that MATCH inflation.

      Around here no employee gets anymore than a 3% raise every 3-5 years, no matter what. And this is a very progressive place to work in my area, most people don't ever get raises, EVER around here. They get hired at 8.00$ an hour and are expected to work that until they commit suicide at which point they will be replaced by another 8.00$ employee.

    11. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Why? Are they providing more than inflation-level additional value?

      In my field, billing rates have increased just under 1% annually over the past 20 years in constant dollar terms for a fixed position. Factoring in inflation of 2%, that is an effective reduction in pay... However, I now make about 6-7x as much inflation adjusted as when I started because of the value I provide (at least in theory; I mostly just read /.). That might not be the norm, but looking at a 3x increase you have the same effective issue.

      Long-term (20+ years), changing jobs every 2-3 years catches up with you. Ultimately you find that you have to work harder to find a job, getting inflation-level raises is hard, and you are first in line to be cut. It works out ok if you save money in those early years, but if you don't then the NPV of job hopping isn't favorable.

    12. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long-term (20+ years), changing jobs every 2-3 years catches up with you. Ultimately you find that you have to work harder to find a job, getting inflation-level raises is hard, and you are first in line to be cut. It works out ok if you save money in those early years, but if you don't then the NPV of job hopping isn't favorable.

      I've wondered about this given a how few old college acquaintances I see on LinkedIn have changed jobs repeatedly: at what point do you accidentally make yourself seen as too expensive compared to other applicants of similar or greater experience level?

    13. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It ends up mainly not being about cost but concerns that you can't hold down a job either due to being fired or becoming bored. That creates a lot of risk for an employer, especially at higher salary levels.

      Contractors are a different story, but they are often hard to get out of independent contractor roles.

    14. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Why? Are they providing more than inflation-level additional value?

      Supply and demand don't work that way.

      If the worker can get 5% more money by changing employers, that worker is worth 5% more. No matter what inflation and "value" are.

    15. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My point is that this approach only works for so long. Eventually it catches up with people.

  15. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho? [byrslf.co]"

    Because it reminds us of Vietnam.

  16. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's mostly millennials who buy Apple's products. Without them camping in a line around the Apple store when the new iSuck comes out, Apple would be out of business

  17. Two things by dfm3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are two factors at play here. One, employers these days no longer offer as many incentives that lead to employee retention, and instead treat them as a disposable "human resource" to be squeezed in the eternal quest to maximize profit. It's virtually impossible to find an employer with a pension plan any more, and even benefits such as retirement and health insurance are becoming increasingly rare.

    All of those benefits were taken for granted 30 years ago. When I was growing up in the 80's, the assumption was that you go to college, get a degree, then immediately get hired by a company and start building your retirement savings and pension while slowly working your way up the corporate ladder within the organization. These days, that's not as common. The baby boomers had those things, and lived under the assumption that each generation would be a little more well off than the last. Thus we were all told that if we worked just a little harder, we'd be more successful at the American dream.

    Second, the loss of benefits and the downward trend of wages meant that more of us in the gen-x/pre-millenial generation spent years trying to delude ourselves that those types of job benefits were "just around the corner" and that our current job was just a stepping stone to the career that would give us job security and retirement savings. Now the reality of the new economy has set in and the benefits are vanishing, and most millennials have realized that in many cases the job they have is as good as it's going to get. Switching employers is also getting harder because there is so much competition these days; an opening that at one time would get 20-30 applicants now receives hundreds of applications from people looking for that elusive career.

    1. Re:Two things by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2

      The baby boomers had those things, and lived under the assumption that each generation would be a little more well off than the last. Thus we were all told that if we worked just a little harder, we'd be more successful at the American dream.

      The baby boomers voted to give themselves those things when they had retired. While they were working they only had to pay for a smaller number of older people who did not live as long past the retirement age as the boomers are going too. That is the main reason successive generations are screwed. Whether by student loan, higher property prices, higher rents, more taxes, higher 'pension pot' contributions, more immigration, the young worker of today is going to get the income squeezed out of them to pay for a lot of promises that were made by politicians who are no longer in power.

    2. Re:Two things by dfm3 · · Score: 2

      The baby boomers voted to give themselves those things when they had retired.

      Exactly! And you how much I would love to be able to make the same choice! After retirement, my father is able to draw from a pension and a 401(k) from the two employers he worked at over his lifetime, and it's more than enough to live comfortably. At this point I only have the latter, and it will not be nearly enough to support even my basic needs when I retire. And for the very reasons you mention, it's nearly impossible for me to save beyond that. What savings I do have, I pray that nobody in my family ever has a major illness, because even with insurance it would be wiped out overnight.

      Who was is that said, the old American dream was a house in the suburbs, two cars, and a pension; the new American dream is being able to afford the rent?

    3. Re:Two things by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      I, for one, was glad to see the defined benefit pension go and be replaced with increased employer contributions to the 401K. That is assuming your employer actually did that second part. With a traditional pension there is typically a rapid rise in the value between the ages of 50 and 65. If you work for a company for 20+ years only to get laid off when you hit your mid 40s you can be totally screwed with the pension. Just getting to the knee in the curve and then have to start over. Two pensions worth $1000/mo each after working 35 years is not as good as one pension worth $5000/mo. after working 30 years.

    4. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether by student loan, higher property prices, higher rents, more taxes, higher 'pension pot' contributions, more immigration, the young worker of today is going to get the income squeezed out of them to pay for a lot of promises that were made by politicians who are no longer in power.

      I'm not sure there are more taxes today than there used to be (although as a percentage of total tax paid, they are - the top tax rate dropped from 90% in the 60s to just over 40% now)
      That said, student loans are a major problem. Tuition rates are higher now. Why? Because your parents keep voting for politicians who like to "slash wasteful spending" - like public secondary education. They'll also vote for politicians who promise to "reform" Medicare and/or Social Security by effectively destroying it, but in a gradual manner so that it won't be in gone until those voters are mainly dead.

    5. Re:Two things by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      After ObamaCare got passed in 2010, the contracting agencies that I worked for started offering full benefit packages (including health insurance) to stay competitive with each other. When I worked seven days a week for two years (2011-2013) after my Chapter Seven bankruptcy in 2011, I worked for three different contracting agencies that were offering nearly identical benefit packages. The current contracting agency that I work for offered the regular benefit package, paid federal holidays and 20 Paid Time Off (PTO) days, and gave me an extra month of pay as a Christmas bonus last year.

    6. Re:Two things by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      All of those benefits were taken for granted 30 years ago

      Yes, but it was definitely on the way out by this time also. I used to read a lot of business journals in high school and knew that the lifelong employment of my parents was to be a thing of the past and planned my career around it. Life and the and the economic environment is always changing. My parents, or at least grand parents, probably grew up thinking that they would be farmers.

    7. Re:Two things by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I was getting full benefits from a contract company that I worked for in the 1980's.

    8. Re:Two things by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I was getting full benefits from a contract company that I worked for in the 1980's.

      Before 2010, I wasn't.

    9. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuition rates are higher now. Why? Because your parents keep voting for politicians who like to "slash wasteful spending"
       
      Wrong there, Skippy. The US spends more per student for all public education (including secondary education) than they have at any other time in history. All the hubbub about education funding cuts are nothing more than soundbites for the lazy voter that fail to stand up to even the minimal amount of research into the matter.

    10. Re:Two things by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I also miss the standard 5% APR savings account. These days you can hardly find anything offer better than 1%, if that. Hell, I'm damn lucky that I inherited into a fund that is guaranteed 2.9% that I can only touch when I'm 62.

      All the cream has been taken by the 1% and we're just left with the watery milk.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    11. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, was glad to see the defined benefit pension go and be replaced with increased employer contributions to the 401K. That is assuming your employer actually did that second part. With a traditional pension there is typically a rapid rise in the value between the ages of 50 and 65. If you work for a company for 20+ years only to get laid off when you hit your mid 40s you can be totally screwed with the pension. Just getting to the knee in the curve and then have to start over. Two pensions worth $1000/mo each after working 35 years is not as good as one pension worth $5000/mo. after working 30 years.

      5000$ per month? Jesus Christ what kind of pensions are you pulling? Even the best absolute best pension today is only maybe 1.5 - 2k a month.

  18. Stick with your job when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stick with your job as long as your employer makes it worth your while to do so. No hate on anyone who gets a better job. If only companies promoted or gave real raises...

    1. Re:Stick with your job when... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      And since they don't do that, I move to greener pastures when necessary. Right now, I am in a very good position, great work-life balance, good money, good training opportunities and general satisfaction.

      If that's not what you got, get the hell out and move on! Loyalty where it belongs, I am loyal to an employer that treats me like an asset. I certainly am not to an employer that treats me like some expendable tool.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millennials actually seem to be quite conservative in terms of the financial risks they are willing to take...

    Buried in college debt after obtaining a Masters degree in the Entitlement Arts tends to do that.

  20. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And that's all I have to say about that.

  21. Gen X was the same by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

    I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

    1. Re:Gen X was the same by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Are you talking a McDonalds job, or an actual job? My personal experience doesn't support that view, if you are talking about actual jobs. I've been within the same group of companies for 10 years, prior to that it was about 4 years. The majority of my colleagues at both places tended to hover at the 5+ year mark. Yes, some people left after short stints, but those were the minority.

      Prior to starting my career, I worked a multitude of "McDonalds Jobs", where my longest tenure was probably a year and a half. But that was more of a function of life situations, transitioning from High School to College, College back to the Home Town, then realizing the home town didn't have shit for career work.

      I should note, I fall at the end of the Gen-X scale, depending on which scale you use.

    2. Re:Gen X was the same by flink · · Score: 1

      I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      I am tail end of gen X (born '78). I don't know if it's me or just the Boston job market, but I don't see that much rapid job hopping around here among my peers. Personally, I worked for a single company from '97 to 2012, although there was an acquisition thrown in there. I do know that as a hiring manager, if I see a resume with 5 positions in the last 4 years, it is going to the bottom of my pile. When you are working on a large deployed system with plenty of legacy code, it takes at least a few months to get a new person completely up to speed to the point where you can trust their commits. If I spend all that effort training the person, I don't want someone who is going to ditch 6 months later.

    3. Re:Gen X was the same by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One should note that the jobs back then came with an expiration date. When you were hired as a programmer for the latest and greatest technology, you knew that you are gone the moment the next big thing comes along and you're not the one who can play that new tune.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Gen X was the same by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Fair point. In that respect, I'm glad I don't follow the cutting edge. Shit moves too fast, literally no way to keep up.

    5. Re:Gen X was the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked a lot of short term jobs through the early to mid 2000s doing sysadmin contract work in the DC metro area. A lot of these positions were in the 6 month to year range. Perhaps this is more of a quirk of the DC area with its large number of contracting firms of both defense and non-defense related work.

    6. Re:Gen X was the same by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Hardly. The reason the 50's are looked back so fondly on is because there was increasing labor wages and much job jumping to be done to get an effective raise. It was like a decade long .com boom.

    7. Re:Gen X was the same by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Are you talking a McDonalds job, or an actual job? My personal experience doesn't support that view, if you are talking about actual jobs.

      It does mine with the .com boom and the companies that survived it. Amazon pretty much thrives on short term employment now averaging about 18 months. The thing is that its about padding your resume till you finally get a job you want to keep.

    8. Re:Gen X was the same by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Yep, I drank the Kool-Aid at Amazon in 2001 for a year, six figures. Never made quite that much again but it sure did help on the resume. And no, I won't go back there no matter how many head hunters call me. At least I was able to use that flush to buy a house in 2001 that we sold in 2007, walking away with $160k to out right own the house I live in now away from the city.

      I ended up working for a French aerospace firm with killer benefits, fully paid healthcare, four weeks vacation, matching 401k, but lower pay. I also don't have to commute to downtown Seattle everyday, just from Tulalip Bay to downtown Everett. One of the major reasons that I have stay with my company is when my wife died back in January they were very supportive. Sent flowers and a card signed by all the managers, five weeks off, don't worry about it, anything we can do to help? Loyalty and truly caring about a co-worker is something a bigger paycheck just doesn't match. They will have to pry my cold dead fingers from my ergo-metric chair.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  22. 4yr = 5yr? This data is a little skewed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Article:
    "Workers who have worked for their current employer for more than one year are considered to have worked 13 months or more. Workers who have worked for their current employer for more than four years are considered to have worked five years or more."

    Why not title the graphs 12 months and 4 years?

    1. Re:4yr = 5yr? This data is a little skewed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphs need constant intervals, and these rules are for rounding and grouping.

  23. It's worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to be that millennials only had to deal with boomers projecting onto them, but now gen x is getting in on the act.

  24. Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave them by substance2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a Gen-Xer myself, I wasn't leaving my jobs, most of the time, the jobs were contracts or would end.
    We didn't have stability like our parents before us or expect a wage hike without moving to another company.
    Do the number separate the ones leaving vs those being let go?
    My current position is the 1st in my career where I have made it past 5 years of service non-stop. I did work before in another field where I lasted more than 4 years but would end up on unemployment insurance every year for 3 months worth time more or less depending on production needs.

  25. Why are pew researchers so lazy? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    The increasing job tenure of college-educated millennials is consistent with a decline in employer switching among all working-age adults since the 1980s," Pew researchers point out. "The reasons for the decline are not well understood,"

    I think it's pretty easy to understand why job hopping is on the rise.

    1) Raises not keeping pace with salary for new positions
    2) Companies no longer value employees with long term benefits
    3) The instant gratification me, my, mine attitude of America.

    1. Re:Why are pew researchers so lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI. Increased job tenure === less job hopping, not increased job hopping.

    2. Re:Why are pew researchers so lazy? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's pretty easy to understand why job hopping is on the rise.

      You also forgot that it was business that pioneered the idea that new management should sweep in and fire, er lay off, er downsize, er rightsize, er tell to fuck off a bunch of people.

      It makes no sense to show the slightest shred of loyalty to a company that would fire you to gain a miniscule bump in quarterly profits.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Why are pew researchers so lazy? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Reading before coffee is something I need to remember not to do.

  26. I see that Pew can afford moderators by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You've got some Pew on your lip, there. No, there. NO, THERE.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Straw-Stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations. You've successfully toppled a stereotype no one has ever heard of before.

  28. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by geekmux · · Score: 2

    On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho?

    You're asking why the elderly at-risk generation who is statistically suffering from diabetes, heart disease, and obesity is not eating a bowl of salt?

    Don't get me wrong, I like a good bowl of pho, but there are few dishes that you can ingest three days worth of sodium in less than 15 minutes. Go figure the generation who's probably been chastised by their doctor about shitty eating habits shuns it.

    This is like asking why vegans aren't eating McDonalds.

  29. Re:Thanks Obama! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When the recession hits (we're long overdue), it won't be the Hillary Recession.

  30. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Mashiki · · Score: 0

    Here in Canada, millennials are among the worst for financial planning. Are most likely to be in debt or have already filed for bankruptcy by the time they're 25. GenZ on the other hand is very conservative financially and socially.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  31. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    I love pho, so clicked that article to find out why - and it's a millennial spouting garbage that has nothing to do with why baby boomers aren't eating pho except "they don't think eating pho will make America great again because they're Trump nazis."

    The "research" methodology seems quite biased to me. They are comparing a VERY narrow window of GenX (the year 2000 during the dot com bust) to today.

    That's not an apples to apples employment comparison.

  32. Re:Thanks Obama! by Merk42 · · Score: 2

    It'll be the Obama Recession, obviously.

  33. Every story I read about them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to be an attempt to justify their behaviour without putting it in the context of the massive decline in wages and job opportunity they face. I'm guessing of you work for a news outlet run by a billionaire the subject's taboo.

    1. Re:Every story I read about them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly should the job opportunity of liberal arts or soft science majors be?

  34. Millennials by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Are like the dog in that movie...talk to him, sees a squirrel and goes after that. most are just after the next big thing. They are chasing things, instead of building a career.

  35. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    Poe's law strikes again. I honestly can't tell if this post is satire, or the result of reading a satirical article and completely failing to understand the concept of satire.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to seek psychiatric help.

  37. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by jbengt · · Score: 1

    The "research" methodology seems quite biased to me. They are comparing a VERY narrow window of GenX (the year 2000 during the dot com bust) to today.

    And they specifically excluded the self-employed.

  38. Millenials... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    The first generation to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

    1. Re:Millenials... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      The first generation to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

      The first generation that has to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Millenials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most notably, the first generation to use the word "barista".

      (No, you didn't invent the word "awesome". That got played out in the late 80s.)

      But anyway, congratulations on "barista".

    3. Re:Millenials... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This.

      I just recently saw an ad looking for some plain clerk job applicants and wanting at least college level education. What the FUCK is going on there? Either the school system is so borked that you can't expect someone with a high school diploma to read, write and do basic math anymore, or companies are just completely gone nuts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Millenials... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I just recently saw an ad looking for some plain clerk job applicants and wanting at least college level education. What the FUCK is going on there? Either the school system is so borked that you can't expect someone with a high school diploma to read, write and do basic math anymore, or companies are just completely gone nuts.

      I think companies are deliberately devaluing college education to pay workers less money. When I skipped high school to go to community college to get an education in the early 1990's, I had trouble starting my technical career because level-entry jobs required a high school diploma. Never mind that I had an associate degree. If I was starting over today, my associate degree may not be enough to get a level-entry job.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/business/college-degree-required-by-increasing-number-of-companies.html

    5. Re:Millenials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my associate degree may not be enough to get a level-entry job

      No need to worry. The lobby floor is virtually guaranteed to be flat.

    6. Re:Millenials... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      I think it's a little of both - I provide tech support to a lot of college students, I see random samples of their writing from abandoned printouts and such...and honestly i'm not sure how a lot of them make it through classes when finishing high school left them barely able to write coherent sentences, they can't handle basic "click X to do Y" computer tasks, etc.

      If this is at all representative of people with high school diplomas lately, I kinda can see why employers are heading that way.

    7. Re:Millenials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a retail business. It is the perennial home of the over-educated and under-employed.

      All of my staff have at least a bachelors degree, most have masters degrees. I have (over time) employed three people with doctoral degrees to run the cash register / stock shelves.

      Most of the staff stay for several years.

    8. Re:Millenials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many people these days get college degrees (because their parents expected them to get one), but no idea what to do once they have a degree.

      A degree is no longer something people get in order to start working in the field that interests them. We go to college as a continuation of high school -its just whats next.

    9. Re:Millenials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in grade 11 and 12, many students are barely performing math and reading/writing at a 5th grade level.

      And besides, if as an employer I have a choice between high school graduate, or college graduate, I'll choose college grad every time... It also weeds out the flaky 18 year olds who still have a lot of growing up to do from someone who has at least spent 2 - 4 years learning how the world works after high school (21-23 years old)

  39. Oh look. Shiny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know something about the MEAN stack but I now I'll learn a lot more. They have Friday beer blasts, and check out the foosball. Four people were playing when I visited.

  40. Re:Thanks Obama! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Not according to the history books.

  41. Re:Thanks Obama! by peragrin · · Score: 1

    That depends. It takes about 6 months to switch from one president to another economically. Technically we are still in Obama economy. Notice how in the last three months things have stalled, job growth is stalling, sales are down? That's the economy Trump is going to get to claim. Of course when it hits the fan he will blame Obama even though he has already taken credit for it.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  42. Yes, millennials love statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, there are always exceptions. In my personal experience though, and after listening to horror story after horror story from friends that are employers, generally speaking, the sterotype holds true, particularly with the youngest of that generation. It's great that you aren't one of the misguided ones, you can be a good example. The rest are definitely spoiling the pot for you, though. I will tell you this: more and more, an awful lot of people are doing everything they can to not hire millennials in the first place (nothing illegal, just casting a wider net, etc.). FWIW, I don't blame you, I blame your parents.

    PS - it is also true, due to youthful naivité and inexperience, and unwillingness to learn from those who are wiser (again NOTyour parents), a lot of kids have no awareness that their attitudes and behavior are unacceptable or undesirable in the first place. Unfortunately, other people do. Again, I largely blame your parents, but most of you are great at being victims and fail utterly at projecting depth or maturity.

  43. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much every study of millennials is junk. There is no well defined date range for the millennial genreation.

  44. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    You're asking why

    No. RTFL.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  45. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

    Ah lookee! It's the guy who likes to whine about millenials.

    Don't worry gramps, one day people will believe you that you have an inherent advantage just due to when you were born and that you automatically superior to younger people just bcause. I'm sure that will happen aaaanyyyy daaaayyy noww...

    No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare crises when planning their daily budget.

    OK, so if you exclude all the data that doesn't fit your conclusions, you can get the conclusion you like! That muse be a non millenial thing, I guess?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  46. Well duh! by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    college-educated millennials

    Not like they have a choice in the matter given the cost of education...

  47. Of course they aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they're a bunch of shit, explosively defecated out of the festering sphincter of diarrhoic humanity.

  48. Re:Thanks Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how in the last three months things have stalled, job growth is stalling, sales are down?

    You mean, after Trump took office? That was amazing planning by the Obama team, wasn't it?
    Or could it just be that .... businesses are unsure about Trump, consumers are worried, and his utterly chaotic nonsensical flip-flopping has people worried?

  49. RTFM by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Note: Workers refers to wage and salary workers. The self-employed are not included.

    How much of the "gig-economy", the exact thing that we all believe causes shorter "tenure", is being excluded entirely? Certainly at least a couple percentage points, right?

    Sincerely,
    A Millenial

    1. Re:RTFM by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      "Self-employed not included" is all you need to know this. Because more and more companies don't employ you, they "hire" you. As a contractor. Which makes you technically self employed. For the 2-3 months they want you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    I am a millenial! You must be kidding if you think people are thinking "I better save my money because Social Security is gonna need it to pay the baby booomers!"

  51. Unqualified analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may not know what I'm talking about, I didn't read the whole article.

    Millennials aren't good hopping as much as previous generations. Here's a couple of questions:
    1. Are they able to. e.g. skill set
    2. Do they want to
    3. Are jobs available
    4. Are the jobs available something they are willing to do
    5. Are they not jumping because the hiring manager won't pay them more than they are worth

    To make a blanket statement that they are job jumping as much as previous generations is ignorant without provided a valid comparison of market conditions and behavioral analysis.

    The next story that will be posted is "High school aged people jump jobs even less than millenials".

  52. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Maritz · · Score: 0

    "the guy"? lol. There's a boat load of these wankers.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  53. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. Millennials know the new deal is boned. Some of us are hoping to buy a home, but the idea of always-available equity isn't the safety net it used to be. We've seen our grandparents retire without enough nest egg, and are trying to put anything extra into retirement early. Not easy to do with 40k in student loans and rent so high I'm still eating Ramen a year before graduation. All of my friends are in the same spot, but maybe that's a reason why they're my friends I guess.

    We don't want free shit, much as it seems like you all think. We just want the same starting line you got. Not saying you all didn't work hard, but I am saying I'm gonna start further behind than you did, and not because I'm English lit but be because tuition is costing me more than my dad's first house.

    I like my android, btw. I paid $250 for it. Kind of a lot, but I think of it like you might have thought a decent car at my age. They're USEFUL and RELIABLE and if I lose my phone I lose my Internet access (my apartment is 7 down, 3 up, phone is faster ffs and I can just use tether fit anything not netflix).

    Anyways, yeah, that's the spot I'm in.

  54. Are you kidding? by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Under 30. Current place of employment has decent insurance, lots of PTO, 6% matching 401k, and a pension. 3 promotions in 7 years and I plan to be here for as long as I can manage it.

    This stereotype is more of a software/IT sort of thing. Plus millennials don't know what a stable economy looks like, and are all afraid they won't find a job after their current one.

  55. Shit link by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Why not link direct to Pew?

  56. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    Millennials actually seem to be quite conservative in terms of the financial risks they are willing to take. Not that surprising, they have been royally fucked by the Boomers and are facing some huge problems coming down the line (paying Boomer's pensions/healthcare, severe environmental problems and disorderly transition, student loans reaching critical mass etc.)

    Wouldn't it be nice if we could just kill those goddamned boomers - the cause of every problem, and the elimination of which would cause the world to enter into universal prosperity?

    Here's how i see it. Remember "The Greatest generation?" The best people ever conceived and begat? I recall that at the same time as being best, they actually managed to cause a momentary downtick in the world's population, put us in various military actions in the far east, left us with burning rivers, put asbestos in our toothpaste, killed children with X-Ray machines for their feet, and a whole bunch of other stupid stuff that kinda puts the lie to the idea.

    Short version is the evil Boomers did not have a pristine and perfect world handed to them that they fucked up just to hand it to the poor millenials, while they laughed all the way to the bank.

    The evil boomers surprisingly enough, have corrected a lot of environmental problems as well. It's just not politically correct to admit that.

    Pensions? Wow, I thought you were a liberal, Animojo! Most pension hate that I've seen is just the financial version of penis envy. Except the people without want to cut off the penises of those who do have one. But I digress

    Back when I graduated and entered the workforce, it was tough for an unmarried male without military service to get a job. So it took a while for me to get started. I was a lifeguard at two places, a cable television lineman, a auto parts and traveling tire salesman, and a pizza chef.

    What I wasn't, was whining about it.

    And there is what I think is a real difference.

    There are different circumstances that different generations of people are born into. I couldn't help that I stood a good chance of being drafted and sent to Vietnam to die. I couldn't help that when I graduated, the country was in a recession, and I had to work odd jobs until I found my career. I couldn't help so many things.

    But I didn't declare defeat and cry about how mean the world was to me. Which seems to be the state of the millenials - at least those I know personally. And whom fit the meme.

    And therein lies the difference.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  57. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Your fallacy is that you think he doesn't want you to die early...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  58. Re:Thanks Obama! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that he managed to piss off everyone abroad so tourists stay away and companies don't really feel like dropping money onto a country that is quite hostile to everything foreign, even if it's money.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  59. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho?

    You're asking why the elderly at-risk generation who is statistically suffering from diabetes, heart disease, and obesity is not eating a bowl of salt?

    Given all the other crap that the Boomers are putting into their pie holes, I don't think pho would really make that much of a difference. Besides, some varieties of pho don't have an unreasonable amount of salt (25% of the DV):

    * http://www.livestrong.com/article/440591-is-pho-soup-good-for-you/

    Do the folks in Vietnam have issues with sodium intake? Is it a problem inherent in pho, or how in how it is prepared in the West?

  60. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    You must be kidding. No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare crises when planning their daily budget. No one.

    I did, and I do. I do understand that a lot of people don't. I also understand why so many people get themselves into financial deep yogurt too. I was working my retirement strategy when I was in my mid 20's.

    And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

    True - very few if any are. And that's a real problem. But that's no different than young people of any generation. With my generation, it was that "Inflation is going to make my money and savings worthless, so why save?" So we drove our Escalades and refinanced our McMansions. We maxxed out our 5 credit cards, and somehow believed that 50 year mortgages would work.

    Well, some of us anyhow.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  61. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that's what millenials think passes as satire, I'd hate to see their take on farce.

  62. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    "On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho? [byrslf.co]"

    Because it reminds us of Vietnam.

    Jeezuz Christ, that was brutal.

    Pretty accurate too. 8^0

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  63. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Higaran · · Score: 1

    I agree with what your saying, the only difference is between you and millennials is that you were taught not to put your personal stuff out there for others to see. You rarely heard about teenage pregnancy, or anything like that because if something go out everyone in your area knew about it and it was a scandal, or you only heard about the big stuff on the news. Plus you were probably raised that if you whined about anything then you would be considered a pussy. Where as the kids these days were brought up with facebook, and snapchat, and everything needs to be put out there because everyone else is doing it. There is just alot more noise now then with previous generations.

  64. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

    That's because the SS trust fund won't exist when we retire. I'm not buying that new iPhone because I need more money in my 401k instead.

  65. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

    It's 13 years, not 20 years. All the baby boomers are supposed to be retired in 2030, retires will outnumber workers, and two-thirds of the federal budget will go to Social Security/Medicare. I kept 2030 in mind since I read a study after the dot com bust that the IT industry will have a shortage of 1M workers (recent studies peg it at 1M+ workers). When I became a lead video game tester, I got my IT certifications and went back to school to learn computer programming, and got into IT support. Looking forward to making a whole lot more money in 2030 and beyond.

  66. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Some of us are hoping to buy a home, but the idea of always-available equity isn't the safety net it used to be.

    My 60-year-old brother can't retire because his mortgage is underwater and has to keep on working until real estate prices return to insane values. Then again, the mortgage will probably be paid off when his 40-year-old wife retires.

  67. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, holding people accountable for their actions is SOOOOO 1950s amirite

  68. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean to tell me that a generation had economic uncertainty? The horror. Name one generation that didn't have to worry about economics.

  69. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be kidding. No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare crises when planning their daily budget. No one.

    Who the fuck plans a daily budget, and what part of AmiMoJo's post made you think that they were talking about a daily budget?

    You are of course technically correct, but in the most god-awful retarded way possible. No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare in this mythical daily budget, because they've already thought about it in their long-term planning. It's been set aside well before you'd get to the point of this mythical daily budget.

  70. Awful Stats by avandesande · · Score: 2

    First of all, I don't subscribe to any of the millennial bashing as generalizing this way is pointless. OTOH 2000 was the peak of the internet go-go years and job availability/mobility was very high. 2016 not so much....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  71. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Dude, where's your usual slew of unrelated links? It's like you're hardly trying any more.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  72. Re:Thanks Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either my sarcasm meter isn't working, or we're going to need cites for your economic claims.
    Everything I've observed has been the opposite, my job sector (legacy energy) is starting to boom again, among others that were in wait-and-see mode during the last administration.

  73. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by ranton · · Score: 1

    It's mostly millennials who buy Apple's products. Without them camping in a line around the Apple store when the new iSuck comes out, Apple would be out of business

    Millennials make up about 30% of iPhone owners. Half are Gen X or older, and the rest are kids. Millennials are certainly not the majority of Apple customers. iPad demographics are a little older than iPhone users, as are most other non-phone products.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  74. Re:Thanks Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be the Obama Recession, obviously.

    No, it's all BOOOOSH!!!!'s fault.

    Just like all Obama's failures.

  75. No pension, no loyalty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should I stay if there isn't a pension. And when you will cut me loose to save a dollar. If you will cut be loose to save money then I will leave to make more money. Loyalty to people who don't care about me is misplaced stupidity.

  76. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, holding people accountable for their actions is SOOOOO 1950s amirite

    Right, all but the millennials, they don't need to be accountable at all. All they have to do is whine about how no generation ever has had it so bad.

    The best thing about the coming World War Three is that these folks will look back to the time when they were so abused rather fondly as they scrape through landfills in hope of some food.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  77. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Dude, where's your usual slew of unrelated links? It's like you're hardly trying any more.

    You mean those factual links that you never look at, then whine incessantly over when someone else points out that they're factually accurate. Then run away, until a later time like this, where you whine over something instead of adding something to the discussion.

    Don't worry, you can find them over on statcan.gc.ca Unless of course you think that official government statistics aren't factual...like you usually do.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  78. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, you can find them over on statcan.gc.ca Unless of course you think that official government statistics aren't factual...like you usually do.

    aaaah :)

    Glad to see you're back!

    I like how you've linked to the general statistics for Canada site, and not actually to the stats that'd prove your point. Why not just go up a level of abstraction and simply say "it's on the internet". Or even further "the truth is out there".

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  79. Re:Thanks Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "managed to piss off everyone abroad so tourists stay away "

    This isn't going to change any time soon.

  80. Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by zifn4b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason why millenials are demonized and discriminated against is because it's a lot easier to find a convenient scapegoat than to solve real problems. It's just classic dysfunctional behavior. In fact, I would say millenials are more brave about engaging in conflict about legitimate issues in our society and workplaces that are truly wrong and need to be fixed. They're armed with more knowledge and can't just be bullied into submission with a bunch of pseudo-intellectualist talk.

    Would it surprise you to know that I, myself, am not a millenial? Here's what I have to say about typical "older people". If the music is too loud, you're too old. It's time for the old, obsolete ways of doing things that don't work in modern society to be put out to pasture. If that means old people need to go into nursing homes, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way in. You either embrace evolution and progress or you get left behind. Your choice. Choose wisely.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re: Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reply to the article's complaint is as old as time.
      It could be reprinted verbatim 10, 20, or 30 years ago.
      FWIW, I am Gen-X and the media and old people 20 years ago had a field day bitching about our generation's "unique" flaws. Then 20 years go by, and they pretty much do a search-and-replace of "Gen-X" with "Millennial" (because going with "Gen-Y" would've made the repetition too obvious) and reprint the same articles.
      It's all bullshit to sell ads in the papers, TV, and the Web. I wish all Millennials luck in their struggle.

    2. Re: Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I meant to reply to another thread.

    3. Re: Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I wish all Millennials luck in their struggle.

      I share your sentiment. :)

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me correct that for you -

      Millennials are armed with more "INFORMATION"... They do not have more "KNOWLEDGE"... Ask a millennial something and they will google it on their phone... Very few just "know" something... They have instant access to information, but no retained knowledge.

  81. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like asking why vegans aren't eating McDonalds.

    Wait, you mean cardboard isn't vegan? :P

  82. Dot Com Boom vs Millenial Bust by el_smurfo · · Score: 2

    In 2000, it was the culture to move quickly from job to job to bump your pay. I didn't and watched my friends' salaries rise 50% or more beyond mine. In 2017, you're pretty darned lucky to just have a good paying job, so you stick around. It may be a culture of fear, but it's a better overall environment.

  83. Re:Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave th by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    We didn't have stability like our parents before us or expect a wage hike without moving to another company.

    Correct. It's a venture capitalist world. They just incubate companies until they can cash out and then it's "See you l8r!" and off to do it again and again and again. There is no such thing as a long term engagement anymore. The venture capitalists made that a thing of the past. You reap what you sow bitches!

    --
    We'll make great pets
  84. Re:Except by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    They also sleep, breathe, eat, and drink fluids about as often as the previous generations did, but you don't see any articles suggesting Millennials breathe an awful lot. Millennials are only flaky inasmuch as they are apparently on par with how flaky previous generations were, yet for some reason the narrative surrounding Millennials is that they are flaky to an extent not seen in previous generations, even though the data doesn't back that up. Why is that?

    We like to feel as if we have control of the things surrounding us, and one of the ways that we do that is by putting simple labels on complex subjects in an effort to make sense of them. In many cases, our stereotypes are based on outliers from the group or a bad first impression. Confirmation bias reinforces those stereotypes. Our desire to be right prompts us to ignore evidence to the contrary, particularly when those stereotypes make us feel superior in some way. As if those factors weren't already enough, we then have business models that revolve around pushing salacious narratives, such as clickbait journalism that thrives on pandering to the lowest common denominator in order to generate the most pageviews.

    Around and around all of this spins, perpetuating stereotypes that have little or no basis in reality.

    Mind you, I'm someone who has been at his current place of employment for over 5 years...despite being labeled as "Gen X", "Gen Y", and "Millennial" since my birth 33 years ago. The fact that they can't even figure out what to label me should tell you that the labels are imprecise at best. And, to say the least, I wouldn't suggest holding your breath for me to begin embracing the "gig economy", feeling entitled to have anything I want with no effort, or burying my face in my phone to the exclusion of the people around me, despite the notion that those are the traits that define everyone in my (currently assigned) generation.

    Maybe, just maybe, I'll keep being the person I am, just like most everyone else, regardless of what inaccurate stereotypes others--such as yourself--insist on applying to us.

  85. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Fla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they're buying an American designed product instead of the copycat Chinese garbage old people seem to love buy just to 'save' a couple bucks and then bitching about the economy being bad and young people being lazy and undeserving of healthcare etc...

  86. Re:Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave th by substance2003 · · Score: 1

    Correct. It's a venture capitalist world. They just incubate companies until they can cash out and then it's "See you l8r!" and off to do it again and again and again. There is no such thing as a long-term engagement anymore. The venture capitalists made that a thing of the past. You reap what you sow bitches!

    Actually, for Gen X, the problem was that the baby boomers were holding onto the jobs for so long that there were no places for us it seemed. We were even seen by some medias as being the generation with no hope.

  87. Re:Thanks Obama! by davester666 · · Score: 1

    Donald has been claiming that he, personally, is responsible for the increase in the stock market, since he was made the RNC candidate for President.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  88. Re:Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, that's the stereotype you're discussing right now, whether you;re doing it deliberately as comedy or unconsciously as the stereotype defines.

    I am a Gen Xer.

    I live in my Dad's basement rental suite.

    I have a job. It pays about 44k a year. The previous one paid 42k or thereabouts. No company-backed pension, no employer benefits (unless I wanted to more or less pay the entire thing sponsored by my previous company), that in 3 years time I went to the 2nd senior technician in the shop (most senior who was not management), got a total of a 1.50 in raises for three years despite being told I was the most valuable tech they had at several points. The new job is slightly better, which is what I can expect in my province's economy. Prior to all of that, I worked in a kitchen to make ends meet, and that was with parental support.

    All these stereotypes apply to me, and others that I can think of of my generation. So am I Gen X or a early Millennial (by about 20 years)?

    There are days I feel I was sold a bill of goods by those who said they had my best interests at heart: teachers, parents, intern-sponsors. Now I look around and realize that when that bill was written up, they were still thinking of the good old days, when you worked for the same company, got a pension, and felt valued at work in general. That changed. The only consolation I have is that my retired former-professor of a father recently said to me that he only now has begun to see the troubles I and my generation have been dealing with, and that he had no idea it was as bad or as extensive as it is. A little too late, Dad, but thank you for reminding me of what you were like in your prime.

  89. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my IT certifications and went back to school to learn computer programming, and got into IT support. Looking forward to making a whole lot more money in 2030 and beyond.

    Just in time for it all to have been offshored, eh?

  90. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Citation needed. The Millennials I know have Android phones (and may run alternative firmwares), and all the people I know with iPhones are Xers and up.

    I'm sorry, but as an Xer myself, I have much more respect for the Millennials than my own generation. My generation seems to be chock-full of people who absolutely refuse to manage their finances properly, and feel entitled to living like kings even when they don't earn enough money to afford all the luxuries they crave. Then they get mad and blame the "Mexicans" and vote for Trump when the problem is really their own stupid life choices.

  91. A much deeper misunderstanding by Togden · · Score: 1

    I think the real issue here is a broadly accepted custom to demonize benign behavioral preferences and make broad generalizations to get better effect. I mean why does any of this matter, the immigration, job hopping it was homosexuality before that. I'm just disappointed that this question needed to be asked.

  92. They're just flakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just flakes

  93. Hillary lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary lost! GET OVER IT! You asshats get what you want and STILL won't shut the fuck up about it. The hypocrisy is delicious. Whine some more in your safe space you special snowflake.

  94. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Just in time for it all to have been offshored, eh?

    The other half of that study is all the foreign workers going home. They already went home for the skilled construction trade, and, with kids being pushed into college, no one to replace an aging workforce.

  95. NOT TRUE. See TODAY's Wall Street Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny on the bad timing on this fake news but the WSJ just posted an article on the frequency at which young people are switching jobs that says otherwise. lol.
    Fake news is everywhere. Just say it is and it must be. Oh, shit. that's called being a Democrat.

  96. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can’t we just have a nice Christmas, for once?

  97. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because millennials are paying for that pension that boomers think they deserve for no good reason.

    Eliminate their pensions immediately, eliminate social security. They were bad ideas and are unsustainable. If I can't collect it when I turn 135(they'll probably keep upping the age every 5 years by 5 years so that no one can ever collect it but we can keep paying into it) then I shouldn't have to pay into it.

    The boomers paid their income into it to ensure their own retirement. It's not my fault they also decided to use that money for foreign wars and to line the pockets of the 12 richest people in the country.

  98. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, holding people accountable for their actions is SOOOOO 1950s amirite

    Right, all but the millennials, they don't need to be accountable at all. All they have to do is whine about how no generation ever has had it so bad.

    The best thing about the coming World War Three is that these folks will look back to the time when they were so abused rather fondly as they scrape through landfills in hope of some food.

    If there is a world war 3, it will be caused by baby boomers. None of which will be victims(the baby boomer creed, do terrible things but make sure we are insulated)

  99. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    If there is a world war 3, it will be caused by baby boomers. None of which will be victims(the baby boomer creed, do terrible things but make sure we are insulated)

    All those retired boomers are more mysterious and powerful than even the Illuminati, eh?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  100. Re:Thanks Obama! by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    One industry can be booming while others aren't, because they aren't. It all stems from the shifting of priorities and money. It is the boom and bust cycles that everyone should eventually see as a constant with Capitalism. Money is removed from a specific industry during boom times and paid out to investers (the wealthy, predominantly) instead of being banked in order to allow the industry to better weather the bust times. The non-wealthy eat the losses through cuts and other scale-backs within the industry while the wealthy are not and are taking more money from them in another industry's boom time. So, while you may be doing well now, know that your time will come again when your industry cycles back to bust unless you are among the few that make money through money and not real work.

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  101. Re:Thanks Obama! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    With that bullshit going on around your airports, certainly not.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  102. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you fucking joking? Boomers paid heavily into their pensions throughout their entire careers... These pension contributions were all amalgamated into large indexed funds that grew with inflation over time. What they are collecting for pension was largely provided by them over their lifetimes. Millennials are not really paying for Boomers...

    Healthcare may be a different story, but everyone is paying for healthcare - not just millennials...

    And Millennials ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE AT ALL... Have you ever seen a millennial that couldn't resist having the latest smartphone, or tablet, or laptop, or xbox? Never. They have no conservatism in their lives, and must have everything right now. and the latest and the best... Boomers may have the most debt overall, but they were far more conservative spenders than any Millennial I've ever met...

  103. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is a whole lot of hatred that millennial has for their elders. It's almost as if they are taking a massive group of people they consider outsiders and projecting everything that inconveniences them and everything they hate upon that group of outsiders. Sounds a lot like this one guy they taught about in history class with an odd mustache who hated everyone who shared a religion with his parents.