Slashdot Mirror


No, Millennials Aren't a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flakes (fastcompany.com)

From a report: Today, Pew researchers published findings that refute yet another stereotype about millennials that actual millennials find infuriating: the idea that they're job-hopping more often than other generations. According to Pew's analysis of recent government data, "college-educated millennials are sticking with their jobs longer than their Gen X counterparts."

124 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. No so many jobs to hop to by gatkinso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suspect this is the driving factor.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:No so many jobs to hop to by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      I suspect this is the driving factor.

      That was self evident to me. They're not loyal to their employers because their employers are great and worthy of their time. They don't have options, so they cling to what they can get. In two other millennial stories appearing today and not being featured on Slashdot; millennials can't afford the world their parents have made for themselves, so they're still mostly at home, wondering who pulled up the ladder. As such, their prolonged childhood continues.

      And if your knee jerks up and smacks into your chin with a "uneducated plebs and their sense of entitlement" view, you should think about who we have for a president now and how well your indifference is working out for you. You can't actually shit on a whole class of voters forever without consequence until you take away their vote.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  2. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    You forgot to add "get off my lawn!".

    On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho?

    --
    Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
  3. Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just in.. Pew Researchers find out yet another stereotype only applies to a small percentage of the group. I can't wait to see the non-millennial minds blown when they conduct more research and find out the following: - Millennials are mutli-racial despite being portrayed as upper middle class and white - Millennial work ethics vary greatly - Some are hard workers and others are not - Millennial spending habits are all over the map - Some are savers and some are spenders - Some Millennials voted for Trump (GASP) Every generation is different.. I just hope one outright identifier of our generation is our acknowledgement of our differences and ability to cultivate a society where our differences are respected. In other words, be more specific when trying to identify trends across groups of people.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      The Baby Boomers (aka the hippies) fucked things up. Generation X and Millennials are only now beginning to see that mess cleaned up.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Millennials already work noticeably harder than we did, which is why they have jobs to hop. At their age, we still prided outselves no having tuned in and dropped out.

      May they build everything that my generation was afraid to build.

    3. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Hippies are boomers? News to me

      I imagine a lot of things are.

    4. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      Get out of your dead parent's basement then and stop lurking on slashdot and build a world-view that consists of a sample size higher than yourself.

    5. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Generally when you are young you are more likely to job hop looking for that job that not only pays enough but you also enjoy doing, it doesn't matter which generation you where born in. Most Millennials haven't been in the works force long enough for us to know what their habits will be like but to top it of you can't say a generation of college graduates are sticking with jobs longer since they are only now joining the work force and there is no data for you create that statistic with.

    6. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Who do you think was flocking to Woodstock? Boomers.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    7. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      A hippie turns into a boomer the moment he moves from cocaine to Rogaine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nah, don't worry, we have been making jokes about you for way longer than Trump's presidency. We ridicule you for your love of guns, for treating Creationism like it's something real, for your generally incredibly low educational standards, your poor healthcare, your pride in democracy despite living in a two-equal-parties dictatorship...

      It's not like we really needed Trump to feel superior to you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      haven't been in the works force long enough

      Millennials, Born 1981-1997, aka GenerationY, are today's 20-36 year olds. I had reached the top of my career path by the time I was 36.

    10. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      For a clear picture of the economy, it's important to have better data and quantify shit. "Common sense tells me that some millenials don't job hop!" is insufficient. You don't want legislators making retirement policy on an assumption that millenials all do or do not job hop. But at the same time you don't want them making retirement policy saying "Well, every snowflake millenial is different, so we don't really know." You want legislators having hard numbers showing that gen xers and millenials are statistically not different in terms of job duration. And then they'll continue to screw us younger generations over in favor of the greedy boomers, but that's because we don't vote, not because they lack data.

      Yes, I'm aware of the hypocrisy of that last part. Point is, this is not a "Researchers say water is wet" finding, this is necessary quantification. You aren't shocked by the finding? Who cares. We still need to do the damn tests. They're not being done to validate or disprove dumb popular opinions, they're important data for knowing what the fuck is going on with the population.

    11. Re:Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Dude - for quite some time we Gen-X'ers were known as the slacker generation, famous for listening to Nirvana in underwear we haven't bothered to change in the past three weeks.
      That was how we were seen. Our great cultural artifacts were Grunge and Trainspotting and KIDS.

      Now as it happens those are all pretty great things, but they were not flattering.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    12. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I find it ironic you "ridicule for love of guns" yet with a signature about the Bill of Rights (or lack thereof). Did it never occur to you that a love of guns can be synonymous with a love of the Bill of Rights? Hypocritical much, eh?

    13. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      it seems like the only part of the Bill of Rights that hasn't been ignored is the Second.

    14. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, as someone else pointed out with real data. However, the thing to understand is that not all boomers were hippies, in fact very very few were. The hippies were a tiny, but vocal minority in the Boomer generation. That's why the overall actions of that generation seem so contrary to hippie values. They never had any political power.

    15. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Honestly, there are plenty of attacks and restrictions on the 2nd. If I were to agree with you it would be because that it is the hardest Right to take away. A physical thing compared to an idea or virtue or process. Compare "they'll take my gun from my cold dead hands" versus when do you have a right of privacy online when using a private company server traversing public/international infrastructure. One is a little easier to understand with much less subtlety and nuance that do not overlap with another Right.

      An interesting read is about the invention/propagation of telephone/telegraph and what the government did with that new technology to stop criminal activity. A lot of similarities to today. It took a while for the courts and the legislatures to apply the Bill of Rights to that new technology (privacy, searches and seizures, etc) but they got there and we formed some good protections to those technologies as I am sure we will eventually understand and apply to modern technologies.

      I am an optimist. So long as the people understand that they have these rights and that they must defend them from all manner of attacks, the government will eventually capitulate because eventually it would be suicidal for a politician to platform degradation of those rights. Although it is becoming harder to understand these rights in conjunction with the other rights we hold dear. (private property of the server, the public access to infrastructure, privacy of the individual, and impartiality of public accommodations) for just one example.

    16. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Where's the irony? If anything it's ironic that the only part of the constitution of the USA that today still has some relevance (unlike, say, the 3rd) that people will defend tooth, nail and claw is also the most irrelevant one: The second.

      Have you noticed how first, fourth and fifth were simply thrown out the window and nobody gave half a shit? These are, by the way, the ones that are most likely going to affect you as a normal citizen. But they were de facto eliminated without any kind of outcry or protest.

      But dare to think about pondering somehow dealing with the second and you find half of the US crying bloody murder.

      And yes, the second amendment has been rendered redundant a long, long while ago. Why do you think your government doesn't bother trying to remove it? You have the right to a gun. Do you think that means that you're by any stretch of imagination a threat to your government or that you can keep it "in check" that way? I hold your gun and raise you an army. Even something like the national guard would be enough to eradicate any kind of opposition you and your buddies could possible represent.

      But that's America for you. Fighting over petty rubbish while simply ignoring the important bits in life. You can argue yourself into hysteria over, say, abortion, gun laws or the origin of the world, but let your government get away with any and all decisions that really matter.

      You people are really the perfect people any dictator could want.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      The irony is that your signature decries the forgotten rights in the BoR yet you want to get rid of one of those rights because you don't like it.

      I will quote myself because I highlighted this in different comments:

      "...A physical thing compared to an idea or virtue or process. Compare "they'll take my gun from my cold dead hands" versus when do you have a right of privacy online when using a private company server traversing public/international infrastructure. One is a little easier to understand with much less subtlety and nuance that do not overlap with another Right.

      An interesting read is about the invention/propagation of telephone/telegraph and what the government did with that new technology to stop criminal activity. A lot of similarities to today. It took a while for the courts and the legislatures to apply the Bill of Rights to that new technology (privacy, searches and seizures, etc) but they got there and we formed some good protections to those technologies as I am sure we will eventually understand and apply to modern technologies. ...it is becoming harder to understand these rights in conjunction with the other rights we hold dear. (private property of the server, the public access to infrastructure, privacy of the individual, and impartiality of public accommodations) for just one example."

      most irrelevant one: The second... . Do you think that means that you're by any stretch of imagination a threat to your government or that you can keep it "in check" that way? I hold your gun and raise you an army.

      You have a very narrow view of what the 2nd is for if you think it is only for holding the government to account. To quote msyelf in a previous comment because lazy.

      "The right of arms is a right of self defense. Guns are a tool to that enables the citizenry to protect themselves from rogue agitators to state aggression. It is a tool that equalizes the odds of any violent encounter regardless of the physical and fighting prowess you or the agitator may have.

      Tyranny does not have to come from the government. A recent is example is the UC Berkly riots where the rioters were beating people up while the police stood idly by. Something thing to consider is when the government does not enforce law and order. An example being the black panthers in California storming the legislature armed to protest gun control measures and to protest the governments inaction in their communities that was plagued by violence and crime. Guns make any protest to be taken serious and forces the government to acknowledge or respond.

      The right of arms means that even if rhetoric gets out of hand, those "protesters" have to understand fully that if they advocate violence ("this is a war" Berkly riots), that they will have to be willing to put their lives on the line instead of hiding behind group think, propaganda (narrative crafting from news/government), and a complicit government allowing such riots to occur by not breaking them up when they turned violent.

      If you are the receiving end of those protests or rhetoric and the government is complicit with those aggressions, the right of arms gives individual citizens the ability to defend themselves from mob justice and police inaction. Every group has to think twice about making another group the scapegoat of their violence because everyone can defend themselves regardless what the government does."

      You people are really the perfect people any dictator could want.

      How is that different than any other people on earth?

    18. Re: Pew Researchers.. no shit sherlock by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Saw this and thought it was pertinent to my point. Kind of fucked up if you ask me that the police disarm the Trump/freespeech rally people and then stand idly by as antifa riot and beat people up. How would you solve this kind of violence and complicity of the government?

      https://wearechange.org/berkel...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  4. Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with holding one job for too long in IT Support is that you make less money with 2% raises over time than someone who has short-term contracts at different companies. I ran into an old coworker a few years ago during a job interview. He was still making the same kind of money that I made when we worked together 10+ years ago, but the company wanted to pay me 40% more for doing the same work. Fortunately, I had three job offers to pick from and went for the higher offer from a contracting agency.

    1. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      You might think it's funny but he is not wrong. When I was coming up in my career I would get 2-3% raises for promotions and maybe 1-2% (if anything) annually. Finding a new job was typically 10-15% bump in salary. Why would anyone stay at one company when they are rising up the ranks?

    2. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be making a lot of money. You are getting 40% more than him? You must be making at least $200k?

      I make $50K+ per year, as you damn well know. Keep in mind that this is IT Support. Level entry jobs can start at $10 per hour (minimum wage) without benefits in Silicon Valley. Not everyone in Silicon Valley is a newly minted millionaire or billionaire.

    3. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      So since you were offered 40% more than the other guy, the other guy must be making ~$30k max? In IT support?

    4. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So since you were offered 40% more than the other guy, the other guy must be making ~$30k max? In IT support?

      Correct.

    5. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This. And this is also the reason why I switch jobs quite often. Money is in switching, not staying.

      What can you hope for in the same company? At best, maybe 2, maybe even 3 percent more. Usually at best inflation compensation. Which gets promptly eaten by tax due to our progressive tax system. Switch jobs and you can look at 10, maybe 20 percent more. Provided you're good at what you're doing and you're not, say, Ruby on Rails developer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      It happens - not everyone lives (or wants to live) in California/NY/LA/etc and/or can find a nice high-paying position right away.

      Job before this one, I was making ~$29k in sort of a tier 1 + 2 combo help desk position - yeah, the pay sucked by most standards, but it was enough to let me make a move and get established in a nicer area with lower cost of living, so the sacrifice was worth it till I found something better a few years ago.

    7. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Are you taking into account benefits? Sick time. Vacation time. Employer matching 401k.The peace of mind that comes with stability.

      That particular employer wasn't offering benefits to IT workers. Plus they ran their IT department ass backwards. No anti-virus scanner installed, so virus outbreaks were quite common whenever someone accessed a currency exchange website. All viruses must be removed manually. Reimaging was the absolute last resort. And then there was the HP laptops...

    8. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by ranton · · Score: 1

      Are you taking into account benefits? Sick time. Vacation time. Employer matching 401k.The peace of mind that comes with stability.

      You still get all of those benefits when you move between companies. If you're in demand enough to bounce between companies, you can negotiate for more PTO. I have been at my company for 2 years and I have the same PTO than my counterpart with 14 years seniority only because I negotiated to get the 5 extra days you get with 10 years experience up front.

      And the piece of mind of knowing you can easily find another job with similar pay is much better than the illusion that seniority will save you from layoffs.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    9. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're serious and an idiot or trolling and they are idiots.

    10. Re:Staying still can lead to financial suicide... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm trolling the trolls. Not sure what 110010001000 is doing. ;)

  5. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Baby Boomers!

  6. Re:Except by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    To suggest that they job hop suggests that they have a job and aren't living at home in Mom's basement posting on Slashdot all day.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  7. It's almost like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... you can't lump people into convenient stereotypes based on ! Shit we needed a study for that?!

  8. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Millennials actually seem to be quite conservative in terms of the financial risks they are willing to take. Not that surprising, they have been royally fucked by the Boomers and are facing some huge problems coming down the line (paying Boomer's pensions/healthcare, severe environmental problems and disorderly transition, student loans reaching critical mass etc.)

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    I say this as a Gen-Xer.

    My parents were in careers where you could reasonably be expected to work in the same company all your life. but things are different now. Not sure if the job market is more turbulent, or attitudes have changed. Perhaps this is a result of changes in corporate culture, or faster moving technology resulting in a lot of companies expanding, contracting, forming and collapsing. I get the impression that it was a similar situation for workers during the industrial revolution as well.

    And companies are part of this change. If a department needs a new manager; they might consider hiring from the lower rank, but they're just as likely, if not more, to advertise from outside.

    1. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your parents were working for companies run by the greatest generation.

      Gen X'ers worked for companies run by your parents. See the connection?

      Now that Gen X is running the show, what is left seems to be more stable.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm gen-x as well, our parents could do so because the job market was stable. There wasn't the issues with having your job outsourced to some 3rd party TFW or H1B because companies abuse it. These days? Pretty much everyone has those problems. The more specialized your job the higher the risk that some bean counter will tell management that you can be dumped for someone who costs 1/3 while farming out your specialized training to x company who will save them a ton of money(but ends up costing them more).

      In my grandfather's day, he could quit a job at 8am and have a new job by 10am on the same day. He was a skilled tradesman. If you're a skilled tradesman you can do that today as well, there are far more jobs out there for pretty much every trade that you can pick and choose. And some companies go to absurd lengths to bring you in, even in a non-union shop. For example, the local big truck company here is offering $5k/signing, $15k tool allowance yearly, and 3.5x OT pay over 60/hr week, with double time at the 41-59hr range.

      Really, a lot of people who are having problems finding a job, could likely do well in that. Or drive trucks for a while, which has a faster pickup after training. 4yrs is a long time as an apprentice, and the wages you're paid those 4yrs aren't enough to keep you fed, housed, and if you have any type of family? Not a chance. I was paid $2.25/hr(min wage was $6.80) the first 3 years as a mechanics apprentice in the 90's. It's $10.50ish now, but your pay rate is around $5.85/hr for the first year. The demand is so high for drivers in this area that you get an "automatic 200hrs" and insurance qualification from a written multiple choice exam. That's not even starting on the stuff they use to try luring people to them. Free satellite TV, free internet, monthly stipends of $700/food, $3k signing bonuses. I've even seen a few who will hire and pay your drivers training(usually at a good school which includes a skid course) if you agree to contractually stay with the company for 2yrs.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by jeff4747 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My parents were in careers where you could reasonably be expected to work in the same company all your life

      Your (our) parents worked for companies that cared about employees. Layoffs were a last resort. New technology? Time to send some employees to get some training on that technology. And so on. The result was loyal employees, low hiring costs and massive institutional memory which made the company far more effective in the long run.

      Then the long run became less important. Executive compensation moved from primarily salary with some bonuses/options to primarily bonuses/options with some salary. A big layoff would result in a large pile of cash because of how it could goose one quarter's results, even if it hurt the company in the long run. "Personnel" was replaced with "Human Resources". Training budgets became "waste" instead of a good investment. Same with the "R" in R&D. Employees were now lazy moochers taking away from the bottom line, instead of the people who actually create that bottom line.

      Employees responded to this in the entirely logical way: if the company doesn't give a damn about the employees, the employees aren't going to give a damn about the company. And changing jobs every 3-5 years brought in larger raises than staying put.

      Moving back to the old paradigm would require a massive philosophical change in the executive suite. So it's not going to happen any time soon.

    4. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      My father worked in one job for his whole life. My mom had a total of three (mostly because of pregnancies). I had 8 so far. And counting. I'm probably about at half time for my total working years.

      Companies today keep reorganizing constantly, something that was pretty much unheard of two or three decades ago. That means people get laid off, people get hired, people get switched around, people get moved to other companies in mergers where they might not like the company culture and quit...

      Now add that leaps in salary ONLY happen when you switch jobs and you know why people keep hopping. I just calculated it, if I stayed in my first job that I actually had for a whooping 5 years, I would now earn about 60% of my actual salary.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      I'm not necessarily saying this is a bad thing. Job flexibility has its benefits, after all. But there is certainly a quid pro quo here. The employee's loyalty is a reflection of the company's loyalty.

    6. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by Khashishi · · Score: 2

      And changing jobs every 3-5 years brought in larger raises than staying put.

      Bingo. If companies cared about retaining employees, they would give them more than inflation-level raises.

    7. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Why? Are they providing more than inflation-level additional value?

      In my field, billing rates have increased just under 1% annually over the past 20 years in constant dollar terms for a fixed position. Factoring in inflation of 2%, that is an effective reduction in pay... However, I now make about 6-7x as much inflation adjusted as when I started because of the value I provide (at least in theory; I mostly just read /.). That might not be the norm, but looking at a 3x increase you have the same effective issue.

      Long-term (20+ years), changing jobs every 2-3 years catches up with you. Ultimately you find that you have to work harder to find a job, getting inflation-level raises is hard, and you are first in line to be cut. It works out ok if you save money in those early years, but if you don't then the NPV of job hopping isn't favorable.

    8. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It ends up mainly not being about cost but concerns that you can't hold down a job either due to being fired or becoming bored. That creates a lot of risk for an employer, especially at higher salary levels.

      Contractors are a different story, but they are often hard to get out of independent contractor roles.

    9. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Why? Are they providing more than inflation-level additional value?

      Supply and demand don't work that way.

      If the worker can get 5% more money by changing employers, that worker is worth 5% more. No matter what inflation and "value" are.

    10. Re:Gen X are even greater job-hopping flakes! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My point is that this approach only works for so long. Eventually it catches up with people.

  10. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho? [byrslf.co]"

    Because it reminds us of Vietnam.

  11. Two things by dfm3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are two factors at play here. One, employers these days no longer offer as many incentives that lead to employee retention, and instead treat them as a disposable "human resource" to be squeezed in the eternal quest to maximize profit. It's virtually impossible to find an employer with a pension plan any more, and even benefits such as retirement and health insurance are becoming increasingly rare.

    All of those benefits were taken for granted 30 years ago. When I was growing up in the 80's, the assumption was that you go to college, get a degree, then immediately get hired by a company and start building your retirement savings and pension while slowly working your way up the corporate ladder within the organization. These days, that's not as common. The baby boomers had those things, and lived under the assumption that each generation would be a little more well off than the last. Thus we were all told that if we worked just a little harder, we'd be more successful at the American dream.

    Second, the loss of benefits and the downward trend of wages meant that more of us in the gen-x/pre-millenial generation spent years trying to delude ourselves that those types of job benefits were "just around the corner" and that our current job was just a stepping stone to the career that would give us job security and retirement savings. Now the reality of the new economy has set in and the benefits are vanishing, and most millennials have realized that in many cases the job they have is as good as it's going to get. Switching employers is also getting harder because there is so much competition these days; an opening that at one time would get 20-30 applicants now receives hundreds of applications from people looking for that elusive career.

    1. Re:Two things by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2

      The baby boomers had those things, and lived under the assumption that each generation would be a little more well off than the last. Thus we were all told that if we worked just a little harder, we'd be more successful at the American dream.

      The baby boomers voted to give themselves those things when they had retired. While they were working they only had to pay for a smaller number of older people who did not live as long past the retirement age as the boomers are going too. That is the main reason successive generations are screwed. Whether by student loan, higher property prices, higher rents, more taxes, higher 'pension pot' contributions, more immigration, the young worker of today is going to get the income squeezed out of them to pay for a lot of promises that were made by politicians who are no longer in power.

    2. Re:Two things by dfm3 · · Score: 2

      The baby boomers voted to give themselves those things when they had retired.

      Exactly! And you how much I would love to be able to make the same choice! After retirement, my father is able to draw from a pension and a 401(k) from the two employers he worked at over his lifetime, and it's more than enough to live comfortably. At this point I only have the latter, and it will not be nearly enough to support even my basic needs when I retire. And for the very reasons you mention, it's nearly impossible for me to save beyond that. What savings I do have, I pray that nobody in my family ever has a major illness, because even with insurance it would be wiped out overnight.

      Who was is that said, the old American dream was a house in the suburbs, two cars, and a pension; the new American dream is being able to afford the rent?

    3. Re:Two things by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      I, for one, was glad to see the defined benefit pension go and be replaced with increased employer contributions to the 401K. That is assuming your employer actually did that second part. With a traditional pension there is typically a rapid rise in the value between the ages of 50 and 65. If you work for a company for 20+ years only to get laid off when you hit your mid 40s you can be totally screwed with the pension. Just getting to the knee in the curve and then have to start over. Two pensions worth $1000/mo each after working 35 years is not as good as one pension worth $5000/mo. after working 30 years.

    4. Re:Two things by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      After ObamaCare got passed in 2010, the contracting agencies that I worked for started offering full benefit packages (including health insurance) to stay competitive with each other. When I worked seven days a week for two years (2011-2013) after my Chapter Seven bankruptcy in 2011, I worked for three different contracting agencies that were offering nearly identical benefit packages. The current contracting agency that I work for offered the regular benefit package, paid federal holidays and 20 Paid Time Off (PTO) days, and gave me an extra month of pay as a Christmas bonus last year.

    5. Re:Two things by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      All of those benefits were taken for granted 30 years ago

      Yes, but it was definitely on the way out by this time also. I used to read a lot of business journals in high school and knew that the lifelong employment of my parents was to be a thing of the past and planned my career around it. Life and the and the economic environment is always changing. My parents, or at least grand parents, probably grew up thinking that they would be farmers.

    6. Re:Two things by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I was getting full benefits from a contract company that I worked for in the 1980's.

    7. Re:Two things by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I was getting full benefits from a contract company that I worked for in the 1980's.

      Before 2010, I wasn't.

    8. Re:Two things by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I also miss the standard 5% APR savings account. These days you can hardly find anything offer better than 1%, if that. Hell, I'm damn lucky that I inherited into a fund that is guaranteed 2.9% that I can only touch when I'm 62.

      All the cream has been taken by the 1% and we're just left with the watery milk.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  12. Gen X was the same by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

    I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

    1. Re:Gen X was the same by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Are you talking a McDonalds job, or an actual job? My personal experience doesn't support that view, if you are talking about actual jobs. I've been within the same group of companies for 10 years, prior to that it was about 4 years. The majority of my colleagues at both places tended to hover at the 5+ year mark. Yes, some people left after short stints, but those were the minority.

      Prior to starting my career, I worked a multitude of "McDonalds Jobs", where my longest tenure was probably a year and a half. But that was more of a function of life situations, transitioning from High School to College, College back to the Home Town, then realizing the home town didn't have shit for career work.

      I should note, I fall at the end of the Gen-X scale, depending on which scale you use.

    2. Re:Gen X was the same by flink · · Score: 1

      I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      I am tail end of gen X (born '78). I don't know if it's me or just the Boston job market, but I don't see that much rapid job hopping around here among my peers. Personally, I worked for a single company from '97 to 2012, although there was an acquisition thrown in there. I do know that as a hiring manager, if I see a resume with 5 positions in the last 4 years, it is going to the bottom of my pile. When you are working on a large deployed system with plenty of legacy code, it takes at least a few months to get a new person completely up to speed to the point where you can trust their commits. If I spend all that effort training the person, I don't want someone who is going to ditch 6 months later.

    3. Re:Gen X was the same by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One should note that the jobs back then came with an expiration date. When you were hired as a programmer for the latest and greatest technology, you knew that you are gone the moment the next big thing comes along and you're not the one who can play that new tune.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Gen X was the same by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Fair point. In that respect, I'm glad I don't follow the cutting edge. Shit moves too fast, literally no way to keep up.

    5. Re:Gen X was the same by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      I think we even pioneered it. Late 90's up to around 2001 and then starting in 2003 people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Hardly. The reason the 50's are looked back so fondly on is because there was increasing labor wages and much job jumping to be done to get an effective raise. It was like a decade long .com boom.

    6. Re:Gen X was the same by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      people were spending 6 months to a year at a job and then looking for something else

      Are you talking a McDonalds job, or an actual job? My personal experience doesn't support that view, if you are talking about actual jobs.

      It does mine with the .com boom and the companies that survived it. Amazon pretty much thrives on short term employment now averaging about 18 months. The thing is that its about padding your resume till you finally get a job you want to keep.

    7. Re:Gen X was the same by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Yep, I drank the Kool-Aid at Amazon in 2001 for a year, six figures. Never made quite that much again but it sure did help on the resume. And no, I won't go back there no matter how many head hunters call me. At least I was able to use that flush to buy a house in 2001 that we sold in 2007, walking away with $160k to out right own the house I live in now away from the city.

      I ended up working for a French aerospace firm with killer benefits, fully paid healthcare, four weeks vacation, matching 401k, but lower pay. I also don't have to commute to downtown Seattle everyday, just from Tulalip Bay to downtown Everett. One of the major reasons that I have stay with my company is when my wife died back in January they were very supportive. Sent flowers and a card signed by all the managers, five weeks off, don't worry about it, anything we can do to help? Loyalty and truly caring about a co-worker is something a bigger paycheck just doesn't match. They will have to pry my cold dead fingers from my ergo-metric chair.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  13. Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave them by substance2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a Gen-Xer myself, I wasn't leaving my jobs, most of the time, the jobs were contracts or would end.
    We didn't have stability like our parents before us or expect a wage hike without moving to another company.
    Do the number separate the ones leaving vs those being let go?
    My current position is the 1st in my career where I have made it past 5 years of service non-stop. I did work before in another field where I lasted more than 4 years but would end up on unemployment insurance every year for 3 months worth time more or less depending on production needs.

  14. Why are pew researchers so lazy? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    The increasing job tenure of college-educated millennials is consistent with a decline in employer switching among all working-age adults since the 1980s," Pew researchers point out. "The reasons for the decline are not well understood,"

    I think it's pretty easy to understand why job hopping is on the rise.

    1) Raises not keeping pace with salary for new positions
    2) Companies no longer value employees with long term benefits
    3) The instant gratification me, my, mine attitude of America.

    1. Re:Why are pew researchers so lazy? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's pretty easy to understand why job hopping is on the rise.

      You also forgot that it was business that pioneered the idea that new management should sweep in and fire, er lay off, er downsize, er rightsize, er tell to fuck off a bunch of people.

      It makes no sense to show the slightest shred of loyalty to a company that would fire you to gain a miniscule bump in quarterly profits.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Why are pew researchers so lazy? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Reading before coffee is something I need to remember not to do.

  15. I see that Pew can afford moderators by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You've got some Pew on your lip, there. No, there. NO, THERE.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by geekmux · · Score: 2

    On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho?

    You're asking why the elderly at-risk generation who is statistically suffering from diabetes, heart disease, and obesity is not eating a bowl of salt?

    Don't get me wrong, I like a good bowl of pho, but there are few dishes that you can ingest three days worth of sodium in less than 15 minutes. Go figure the generation who's probably been chastised by their doctor about shitty eating habits shuns it.

    This is like asking why vegans aren't eating McDonalds.

  17. Re:Thanks Obama! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When the recession hits (we're long overdue), it won't be the Hillary Recession.

  18. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    I love pho, so clicked that article to find out why - and it's a millennial spouting garbage that has nothing to do with why baby boomers aren't eating pho except "they don't think eating pho will make America great again because they're Trump nazis."

    The "research" methodology seems quite biased to me. They are comparing a VERY narrow window of GenX (the year 2000 during the dot com bust) to today.

    That's not an apples to apples employment comparison.

  19. Re:Thanks Obama! by Merk42 · · Score: 2

    It'll be the Obama Recession, obviously.

  20. Millennials by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Are like the dog in that movie...talk to him, sees a squirrel and goes after that. most are just after the next big thing. They are chasing things, instead of building a career.

  21. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    Poe's law strikes again. I honestly can't tell if this post is satire, or the result of reading a satirical article and completely failing to understand the concept of satire.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  22. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by jbengt · · Score: 1

    The "research" methodology seems quite biased to me. They are comparing a VERY narrow window of GenX (the year 2000 during the dot com bust) to today.

    And they specifically excluded the self-employed.

  23. Millenials... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    The first generation to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

    1. Re:Millenials... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      The first generation to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

      The first generation that has to have degrees so they can work as baristas.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Millenials... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This.

      I just recently saw an ad looking for some plain clerk job applicants and wanting at least college level education. What the FUCK is going on there? Either the school system is so borked that you can't expect someone with a high school diploma to read, write and do basic math anymore, or companies are just completely gone nuts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Millenials... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I just recently saw an ad looking for some plain clerk job applicants and wanting at least college level education. What the FUCK is going on there? Either the school system is so borked that you can't expect someone with a high school diploma to read, write and do basic math anymore, or companies are just completely gone nuts.

      I think companies are deliberately devaluing college education to pay workers less money. When I skipped high school to go to community college to get an education in the early 1990's, I had trouble starting my technical career because level-entry jobs required a high school diploma. Never mind that I had an associate degree. If I was starting over today, my associate degree may not be enough to get a level-entry job.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/business/college-degree-required-by-increasing-number-of-companies.html

    4. Re:Millenials... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      I think it's a little of both - I provide tech support to a lot of college students, I see random samples of their writing from abandoned printouts and such...and honestly i'm not sure how a lot of them make it through classes when finishing high school left them barely able to write coherent sentences, they can't handle basic "click X to do Y" computer tasks, etc.

      If this is at all representative of people with high school diplomas lately, I kinda can see why employers are heading that way.

  24. Re:Thanks Obama! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Not according to the history books.

  25. Re:Thanks Obama! by peragrin · · Score: 1

    That depends. It takes about 6 months to switch from one president to another economically. Technically we are still in Obama economy. Notice how in the last three months things have stalled, job growth is stalling, sales are down? That's the economy Trump is going to get to claim. Of course when it hits the fan he will blame Obama even though he has already taken credit for it.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  26. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    You're asking why

    No. RTFL.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  27. Well duh! by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    college-educated millennials

    Not like they have a choice in the matter given the cost of education...

  28. RTFM by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Note: Workers refers to wage and salary workers. The self-employed are not included.

    How much of the "gig-economy", the exact thing that we all believe causes shorter "tenure", is being excluded entirely? Certainly at least a couple percentage points, right?

    Sincerely,
    A Millenial

    1. Re:RTFM by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      "Self-employed not included" is all you need to know this. Because more and more companies don't employ you, they "hire" you. As a contractor. Which makes you technically self employed. For the 2-3 months they want you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    I am a millenial! You must be kidding if you think people are thinking "I better save my money because Social Security is gonna need it to pay the baby booomers!"

  30. Are you kidding? by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Under 30. Current place of employment has decent insurance, lots of PTO, 6% matching 401k, and a pension. 3 promotions in 7 years and I plan to be here for as long as I can manage it.

    This stereotype is more of a software/IT sort of thing. Plus millennials don't know what a stable economy looks like, and are all afraid they won't find a job after their current one.

  31. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Someone's been bitten by the jealousy bug...

    I'm not jealous. I feel sorry for the Millennials, as they will have to work and pay more in taxes to support all the retired baby boomers that will outnumber the workers paying taxes.

  32. Shit link by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Why not link direct to Pew?

  33. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    Millennials actually seem to be quite conservative in terms of the financial risks they are willing to take. Not that surprising, they have been royally fucked by the Boomers and are facing some huge problems coming down the line (paying Boomer's pensions/healthcare, severe environmental problems and disorderly transition, student loans reaching critical mass etc.)

    Wouldn't it be nice if we could just kill those goddamned boomers - the cause of every problem, and the elimination of which would cause the world to enter into universal prosperity?

    Here's how i see it. Remember "The Greatest generation?" The best people ever conceived and begat? I recall that at the same time as being best, they actually managed to cause a momentary downtick in the world's population, put us in various military actions in the far east, left us with burning rivers, put asbestos in our toothpaste, killed children with X-Ray machines for their feet, and a whole bunch of other stupid stuff that kinda puts the lie to the idea.

    Short version is the evil Boomers did not have a pristine and perfect world handed to them that they fucked up just to hand it to the poor millenials, while they laughed all the way to the bank.

    The evil boomers surprisingly enough, have corrected a lot of environmental problems as well. It's just not politically correct to admit that.

    Pensions? Wow, I thought you were a liberal, Animojo! Most pension hate that I've seen is just the financial version of penis envy. Except the people without want to cut off the penises of those who do have one. But I digress

    Back when I graduated and entered the workforce, it was tough for an unmarried male without military service to get a job. So it took a while for me to get started. I was a lifeguard at two places, a cable television lineman, a auto parts and traveling tire salesman, and a pizza chef.

    What I wasn't, was whining about it.

    And there is what I think is a real difference.

    There are different circumstances that different generations of people are born into. I couldn't help that I stood a good chance of being drafted and sent to Vietnam to die. I couldn't help that when I graduated, the country was in a recession, and I had to work odd jobs until I found my career. I couldn't help so many things.

    But I didn't declare defeat and cry about how mean the world was to me. Which seems to be the state of the millenials - at least those I know personally. And whom fit the meme.

    And therein lies the difference.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  34. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Your fallacy is that you think he doesn't want you to die early...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Re:Millennials by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That sense of entitlement is stunning, isn't it?

    Be a dear, pass the caviar, and ring for the bus boy.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Re:Thanks Obama! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that he managed to piss off everyone abroad so tourists stay away and companies don't really feel like dropping money onto a country that is quite hostile to everything foreign, even if it's money.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    You must be kidding. No one is thinking about pension/SS/healthcare crises when planning their daily budget. No one.

    I did, and I do. I do understand that a lot of people don't. I also understand why so many people get themselves into financial deep yogurt too. I was working my retirement strategy when I was in my mid 20's.

    And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

    True - very few if any are. And that's a real problem. But that's no different than young people of any generation. With my generation, it was that "Inflation is going to make my money and savings worthless, so why save?" So we drove our Escalades and refinanced our McMansions. We maxxed out our 5 credit cards, and somehow believed that 50 year mortgages would work.

    Well, some of us anyhow.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  38. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    "On that note, why aren't baby boomers eating pho? [byrslf.co]"

    Because it reminds us of Vietnam.

    Jeezuz Christ, that was brutal.

    Pretty accurate too. 8^0

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  39. Re:They're a whole lot more than that! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And with good reason. Boomers are the generations that had it all. What's not to be jealous for?

    I myself am a GenX. And I sure as fuck don't envy Millennials. Boomers are retiring, and we're fewer than they were, so we will probably (maybe...) have a job 'til retirement. And with a bit of luck there will even be money left for us to enjoy our retirement.

    The Millennials get to pay the bill for it. Because they again are a pretty strong cohort with fewer jobs to go around, lots of debt weighing down their back, shitty jobs ("generation internship") ahead of them and retirement possibilities being at best a wet dream.

    If I were them, I'd simply nuke the shit and hope that I'll survive the reboot. Because the way it is, they sure are the altar boy in a catholic seminar. No matter what they do, they'll get fucked.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  40. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Higaran · · Score: 1

    I agree with what your saying, the only difference is between you and millennials is that you were taught not to put your personal stuff out there for others to see. You rarely heard about teenage pregnancy, or anything like that because if something go out everyone in your area knew about it and it was a scandal, or you only heard about the big stuff on the news. Plus you were probably raised that if you whined about anything then you would be considered a pussy. Where as the kids these days were brought up with facebook, and snapchat, and everything needs to be put out there because everyone else is doing it. There is just alot more noise now then with previous generations.

  41. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And Millenials certainly aren't thinking "I won't buy that new iPhone because the SS trust fund is going to need my tax dollars in 20 years".

    It's 13 years, not 20 years. All the baby boomers are supposed to be retired in 2030, retires will outnumber workers, and two-thirds of the federal budget will go to Social Security/Medicare. I kept 2030 in mind since I read a study after the dot com bust that the IT industry will have a shortage of 1M workers (recent studies peg it at 1M+ workers). When I became a lead video game tester, I got my IT certifications and went back to school to learn computer programming, and got into IT support. Looking forward to making a whole lot more money in 2030 and beyond.

  42. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Some of us are hoping to buy a home, but the idea of always-available equity isn't the safety net it used to be.

    My 60-year-old brother can't retire because his mortgage is underwater and has to keep on working until real estate prices return to insane values. Then again, the mortgage will probably be paid off when his 40-year-old wife retires.

  43. Re:Stick with your job when... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    And since they don't do that, I move to greener pastures when necessary. Right now, I am in a very good position, great work-life balance, good money, good training opportunities and general satisfaction.

    If that's not what you got, get the hell out and move on! Loyalty where it belongs, I am loyal to an employer that treats me like an asset. I certainly am not to an employer that treats me like some expendable tool.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. Awful Stats by avandesande · · Score: 2

    First of all, I don't subscribe to any of the millennial bashing as generalizing this way is pointless. OTOH 2000 was the peak of the internet go-go years and job availability/mobility was very high. 2016 not so much....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  45. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Dude, where's your usual slew of unrelated links? It's like you're hardly trying any more.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  46. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by ranton · · Score: 1

    It's mostly millennials who buy Apple's products. Without them camping in a line around the Apple store when the new iSuck comes out, Apple would be out of business

    Millennials make up about 30% of iPhone owners. Half are Gen X or older, and the rest are kids. Millennials are certainly not the majority of Apple customers. iPad demographics are a little older than iPhone users, as are most other non-phone products.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  47. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, holding people accountable for their actions is SOOOOO 1950s amirite

    Right, all but the millennials, they don't need to be accountable at all. All they have to do is whine about how no generation ever has had it so bad.

    The best thing about the coming World War Three is that these folks will look back to the time when they were so abused rather fondly as they scrape through landfills in hope of some food.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  48. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Dude, where's your usual slew of unrelated links? It's like you're hardly trying any more.

    You mean those factual links that you never look at, then whine incessantly over when someone else points out that they're factually accurate. Then run away, until a later time like this, where you whine over something instead of adding something to the discussion.

    Don't worry, you can find them over on statcan.gc.ca Unless of course you think that official government statistics aren't factual...like you usually do.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  49. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, you can find them over on statcan.gc.ca Unless of course you think that official government statistics aren't factual...like you usually do.

    aaaah :)

    Glad to see you're back!

    I like how you've linked to the general statistics for Canada site, and not actually to the stats that'd prove your point. Why not just go up a level of abstraction and simply say "it's on the internet". Or even further "the truth is out there".

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  50. Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by zifn4b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason why millenials are demonized and discriminated against is because it's a lot easier to find a convenient scapegoat than to solve real problems. It's just classic dysfunctional behavior. In fact, I would say millenials are more brave about engaging in conflict about legitimate issues in our society and workplaces that are truly wrong and need to be fixed. They're armed with more knowledge and can't just be bullied into submission with a bunch of pseudo-intellectualist talk.

    Would it surprise you to know that I, myself, am not a millenial? Here's what I have to say about typical "older people". If the music is too loud, you're too old. It's time for the old, obsolete ways of doing things that don't work in modern society to be put out to pasture. If that means old people need to go into nursing homes, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way in. You either embrace evolution and progress or you get left behind. Your choice. Choose wisely.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re: Demonizing Millenials = Convenient Scapegoat by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I wish all Millennials luck in their struggle.

      I share your sentiment. :)

      --
      We'll make great pets
  51. Dot Com Boom vs Millenial Bust by el_smurfo · · Score: 2

    In 2000, it was the culture to move quickly from job to job to bump your pay. I didn't and watched my friends' salaries rise 50% or more beyond mine. In 2017, you're pretty darned lucky to just have a good paying job, so you stick around. It may be a culture of fear, but it's a better overall environment.

  52. Re:Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave th by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    We didn't have stability like our parents before us or expect a wage hike without moving to another company.

    Correct. It's a venture capitalist world. They just incubate companies until they can cash out and then it's "See you l8r!" and off to do it again and again and again. There is no such thing as a long term engagement anymore. The venture capitalists made that a thing of the past. You reap what you sow bitches!

    --
    We'll make great pets
  53. Re:Except by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    They also sleep, breathe, eat, and drink fluids about as often as the previous generations did, but you don't see any articles suggesting Millennials breathe an awful lot. Millennials are only flaky inasmuch as they are apparently on par with how flaky previous generations were, yet for some reason the narrative surrounding Millennials is that they are flaky to an extent not seen in previous generations, even though the data doesn't back that up. Why is that?

    We like to feel as if we have control of the things surrounding us, and one of the ways that we do that is by putting simple labels on complex subjects in an effort to make sense of them. In many cases, our stereotypes are based on outliers from the group or a bad first impression. Confirmation bias reinforces those stereotypes. Our desire to be right prompts us to ignore evidence to the contrary, particularly when those stereotypes make us feel superior in some way. As if those factors weren't already enough, we then have business models that revolve around pushing salacious narratives, such as clickbait journalism that thrives on pandering to the lowest common denominator in order to generate the most pageviews.

    Around and around all of this spins, perpetuating stereotypes that have little or no basis in reality.

    Mind you, I'm someone who has been at his current place of employment for over 5 years...despite being labeled as "Gen X", "Gen Y", and "Millennial" since my birth 33 years ago. The fact that they can't even figure out what to label me should tell you that the labels are imprecise at best. And, to say the least, I wouldn't suggest holding your breath for me to begin embracing the "gig economy", feeling entitled to have anything I want with no effort, or burying my face in my phone to the exclusion of the people around me, despite the notion that those are the traits that define everyone in my (currently assigned) generation.

    Maybe, just maybe, I'll keep being the person I am, just like most everyone else, regardless of what inaccurate stereotypes others--such as yourself--insist on applying to us.

  54. Re:Gen-X don't leave their jobs, the jobs leave th by substance2003 · · Score: 1

    Correct. It's a venture capitalist world. They just incubate companies until they can cash out and then it's "See you l8r!" and off to do it again and again and again. There is no such thing as a long-term engagement anymore. The venture capitalists made that a thing of the past. You reap what you sow bitches!

    Actually, for Gen X, the problem was that the baby boomers were holding onto the jobs for so long that there were no places for us it seemed. We were even seen by some medias as being the generation with no hope.

  55. Re:Thanks Obama! by davester666 · · Score: 1

    Donald has been claiming that he, personally, is responsible for the increase in the stock market, since he was made the RNC candidate for President.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  56. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Citation needed. The Millennials I know have Android phones (and may run alternative firmwares), and all the people I know with iPhones are Xers and up.

    I'm sorry, but as an Xer myself, I have much more respect for the Millennials than my own generation. My generation seems to be chock-full of people who absolutely refuse to manage their finances properly, and feel entitled to living like kings even when they don't earn enough money to afford all the luxuries they crave. Then they get mad and blame the "Mexicans" and vote for Trump when the problem is really their own stupid life choices.

  57. A much deeper misunderstanding by Togden · · Score: 1

    I think the real issue here is a broadly accepted custom to demonize benign behavioral preferences and make broad generalizations to get better effect. I mean why does any of this matter, the immigration, job hopping it was homosexuality before that. I'm just disappointed that this question needed to be asked.

  58. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Just in time for it all to have been offshored, eh?

    The other half of that study is all the foreign workers going home. They already went home for the skilled construction trade, and, with kids being pushed into college, no one to replace an aging workforce.

  59. Re: Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flak by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    If there is a world war 3, it will be caused by baby boomers. None of which will be victims(the baby boomer creed, do terrible things but make sure we are insulated)

    All those retired boomers are more mysterious and powerful than even the Illuminati, eh?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  60. Re:Thanks Obama! by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    One industry can be booming while others aren't, because they aren't. It all stems from the shifting of priorities and money. It is the boom and bust cycles that everyone should eventually see as a constant with Capitalism. Money is removed from a specific industry during boom times and paid out to investers (the wealthy, predominantly) instead of being banked in order to allow the industry to better weather the bust times. The non-wealthy eat the losses through cuts and other scale-backs within the industry while the wealthy are not and are taking more money from them in another industry's boom time. So, while you may be doing well now, know that your time will come again when your industry cycles back to bust unless you are among the few that make money through money and not real work.

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  61. Re:Thanks Obama! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    With that bullshit going on around your airports, certainly not.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  62. Re:Millennials AREN'T a Bunch of Job-Hopping Flake by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is a whole lot of hatred that millennial has for their elders. It's almost as if they are taking a massive group of people they consider outsiders and projecting everything that inconveniences them and everything they hate upon that group of outsiders. Sounds a lot like this one guy they taught about in history class with an odd mustache who hated everyone who shared a religion with his parents.