Slashdot Mirror
Pioneering Researchers Track Sudden Learning 'Epiphanies' (sciencedaily.com)
wisebabo quotes Science Daily:
Until now, researchers had not had a good way to study how people actually experienced what is called "epiphany learning." In new research, scientists at The Ohio State University used eye-tracking and pupil dilation technology to see what happens as people figured out how to win a strategy game on a computer. "We could see our study participants figuring out the solution through their eye movements as they considered their options," said Ian Krajbich, co-author of the study and assistant professor of psychology and economics at Ohio State. "We could predict they were about to have an epiphany before they even knew it was coming."
The original submission suggests, "This might be useful to determine when you are trying to teach a difficult subject to someone who you're afraid might be inclined to just nod their head. Or maybe this is how the Voight-Kampff test works. (Are you a replicant?)"
The original submission suggests, "This might be useful to determine when you are trying to teach a difficult subject to someone who you're afraid might be inclined to just nod their head. Or maybe this is how the Voight-Kampff test works. (Are you a replicant?)"
I am mildly dyslexic. I first read the title as "Pooping Researchers Track Sudden Leaning Elephants"
Happy Sunday, Slashdot!
For myself it was algebra taught by nun at secondary school. 'Woot you can divide, subtract, add on BOTH sides of equal sign and is same thing!
I am firm believer that in maths in particular you need to go as far back as possible to get students to grok core concepts.
I hate idea that so many students are left behind in maths early on as don't have these core revelations.
...nothing appears on the linked page at all!
Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)
http://www.lawrenceperson.com/
It's an exercise to teach you to create, instead of handing you someone's creation.
When I study a textbook, I only do the even numbered exercises. Odd-numbered exercises w/ answers in the back of the book are for wimps.
"We could predict they were about to have an epiphany before they even knew it was coming."
Or maybe the subject had already known about it but had simply not expressed or acted on it, and perhaps they merely studied subjects, thereby learning to identify the proper context with which to catalyze an epiphany. To literally predict what would happen in the individual is ridiculous, they have probably only learned the most likely criteria to identify it.
Here
Twinstiq, game news
As a kid, I loved the Coleco Wiz Quiz: The Computer Question & Answer Game. Each cartridge book had 1,001 trivia questions. I was on my third cartridge book when I had my first epiphany by noticing a specific pattern between all three cartridge books: the answer for question #1 was the always same, so was the answer for question #2, ..., so was the answer for question #1001. Since I had memorized the sequence for 1,001 questions and answers, it took me 15 minutes to go through the third cartridge book without ever reading the questions and answers. I got each and every question right. My immediate action was to throw the game into the trash, as knowing the sequence took the fun out of learning new trivia questions.
What I learned from this epiphany was that I could recognize patterns. When I got an Atari 2600 a few years later and started playing video games, I found more patterns and started beating the video games. I would later work at Accolade/Infogrames/Atari (same company, different owners, multiple personality disorder) for six years (1997-2004), testing 60+ video games, writing 30,000+ bug reports and leading ten titles through testing. When I got into IT support, I became an expert troubleshooter because I could recognize patterns and find solutions.
this result not only sounds plausible, but probably also has some neurology to back it up . . .
The transgendered person's pupils dilated when it suddenly realizes that men's rooms are for men, and ladies rooms are for ladies.
From the article they detect you are about to come to an epiphany when your eyes focus more on the 0 (this solution) and become dilated. that is fine when there is a simple thing to focus on.
This may well be true in limited circumstances, like when learning something physical like playing a game that moving some number but some problems are more abstract, but there are plenty of times I have come up with solutions to problems by doing something else entirely different, even in my sleep (I often think I should be paid for sleeping).
I am also not sure that this learning with this game is simply not a subconscious reward system anyway especially since the solution is so simple (always pick zero).
The first idea was to close my eyes.