Slashdot Mirror


Startup Still Working On 'Immortal Avatars' That Will Live Forever (cnet.com)

Startup Eternime, founded by MIT fellow Marius Ursache, is still working on "immortal avatars" that, after your death, will continue interacting with your loves ones from beyond the grave. An anonymous reader quotes CNET: Give Eternime access to your social media profiles and the startup's algorithms will scrape your posts and interactions to build a profile... The algorithms will study your memories and mannerisms. They'll learn how to be "you"... Eternime was announced in 2014 after Ursache developed the idea during the MIT Entrepreneurship Development Program. He wasn't entirely sure if he should develop the project further and wanted to get a sense of public reaction.

In the first four days, 3,000 people signed up at Eterni.me, the company's website, for a private beta. Then, Urasche received an email from a man dying of terminal cancer. "Eternime, he wrote, was the last chance to leave something behind for friends and family," Urasche told me. "That was the moment I decided that this was something worth dedicating my life to"... Since 2014, the Eternime website has largely been silent, although it continues to take names of people who want to test the service. Ursache says the Eternime team has been refining the product over the last two years, testing features, figuring out what will work and what won't.

"The private beta test is ongoing," according to the article, "and Ursache says the feedback has been positive." But unfortunately, the service still isn't operational yet.

90 comments

  1. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Much like this first post that will also live on forever on Slashdots servers

    1. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is from a black mirror episode. And totally not possible. Its another investor scam. And its taking advantage of desperate people. The perfect money maker.

  2. Mentally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's what you all are. I can't deal with this bizarre nonsense anymore...

    1. Re:Mentally ill. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      Mentally ill? You represent thousands of distinct personalities, Mr. or Ms. AC, and you call us mentally ill?

      Or were you talking to yourself again?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Mentally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just stroking your ego to gather (yet more) information about you. So they can use that info for your avatar (and some other clandestine activities).

    3. Re:Mentally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not forgive or forget

    4. Re:Mentally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit. Who the flying fuck would want to leave behind an animated superhero figure who likes bizarre porn and swears like a fucking sailor for their kids to "interact with".

    5. Re: Mentally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bizzare? Choking squids with masterbating is perfectly normal.

      I need to get more squid...

  3. Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so fucking stupid.

    1. Re:Jesus by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I think there would be much more interest in an 'immoral' avatar.

    2. Re:Jesus by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      It is just like Jesus: he died millennia ago and people are still claiming to speak with him through dubious representations and mediations.

      Ideally this company should include a taxidermy service and have the actual stuffed dead person voice the chatbot.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  4. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1, Informative
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Obligatory by dejaniv · · Score: 4, Interesting
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or GITS:SAC or Cowboy Bebop or ST:TNG holodecks or 2010 or probably a number of scifi stories from 50's, 60s.

    3. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Obligatory by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      No mod points to give you, but I agree.

    5. Re:Obligatory by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      That's the one. San Junipero was positively upbeat by Black Mirror standards and seemed to be about "proper" uploading of consciousness (for the benefit of the person being uploaded) using not-invented-yet technology - something that's been exhaustively covered by SF (and we've got the TV adaptation of Altered Carbon coming soon). "Be right back" was much closer to the spawn of Eliza and Siri powered by Machine Learning snakeoil described in TFA.

      The example that springs to mind is the novel Zendigi by Greg Egan. (First novel I bought as an eBook - turns out to be a paean against digitisation. That's me told).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    6. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people do this silly URL annotating here? We can all tell it is Wikipedia.org because you've already put the URL in the text...

    7. Re:Obligatory by twosat · · Score: 1

      Having recently upgraded to VDSL broadband, I was browsing Youtube a few days ago and typed in "Heaven is a place on Earth". The music video by Belinda Carlisle is rather creepy with masked women in dark uniforms holding illuminated world globes and moving in unison. In the comments section were many comments about the "San Junipero" episode of the "Black Mirror" series. Intrigued, I watched some clips on Youtube about it yesterday. The episode ends with the song playing in the background as the lesbian lovers are reunited again and presumably live happily ever after for all eternity in a virtual reality.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    8. Re:Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The [URL] thing is done automatically by Slashdot.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      turns out to be a paean against digitisation

      More against half-arsed digitisation.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    10. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's to stop spoofing. You can read about it here:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I know, I could've made that so much worse.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    11. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Additional: his other books which touch on digitisation are much more positive about the whole thing.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    12. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have cash, but thanks.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:Obligatory by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Additional: his other books which touch on digitisation are much more positive about the whole thing.

      You obviously haven't read the short Transition Dreams (really horrible concept)... and there are several other shorts that pick at the philosophical aspects a bit more than the novels.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    14. Re:Obligatory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I have read it, I guess I'm just thinking more of the stories where it's more or less taken as read and works perfectly, and just happens to be where the characters live.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Sounds great! Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it'll be a while since I'm eating healthy? I got that juicer/ squeezer for $400 and the service for the packs. I got extended warranties and I can't lose!

    I wouldn't want my friends and family to properly morn my passing and accept death as a normal part of life. Nope! I want them to hang on to a cyber ghost and stay stuck in the past and eventually have to get psychotherapy.

    1. Re:Sounds great! Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to see another anon sharing the same viewpoint here.

      No matter how much my loved ones love me, I'm sure they'd be offended by a fake me that recited canned phrases and shit. That damages the mourning process and can really start screwing people up. Until we find a way to completely reverse or halt aging, death is a fact of life and the more we fight it with monkeypatch technology, the worse we'll fare as a species.

      I think something a bit more tasteful would be a sort of virtual "will" of sorts. A video depicting how you want people to remember you, a collection of things you've wrote (and are proud of, I hope), and perhaps other records you want to pass down such as passwords to important accounts and so on. But you don't need a company for any of that. You can do that today, with consumer level hardware and software. Why pay extra when you can use the stuff in your home and produce a more heartful, more human "digital time capsule" for your family?

  6. Only the egotistical.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think that other people want to interact with them forever

  7. Black Mirror by Rand23 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think this is literally the episode "Be Right Back" of Black Mirror.

    1. Re:Black Mirror by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of A Rose for Miss Emily.

    2. Re:Black Mirror by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I think this is literally the episode "Be Right Back" of Black Mirror.

      Max Headroom did it decades ago.

      "That's... Wonderful!"

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Black Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it's not even that

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg29TuWo0Yo

    4. Re: Black Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but he was a certified Cokeologist.

    5. Re:Black Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is literally the episode of Max Headroom.

      https://www.google.com/search?q=max+headroom+loved+ones&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=max+headroom+deities

  8. Ego much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How big does your fucking ego need to be to think that anything you have to say, think or do is necessary to anyone in the future? If you are dying, try talking to folks you love. They're remember you or not. Just take the dirt nap and get over yourself. This reminds me of that vanity bullshit show on NPR, "StoryCorp". No one cares about your story.

    1. Re:Ego much? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "How big does your fucking ego need to be to think that anything you have to say, think or do is necessary to anyone in the future?"

      Well, we'll see when the Trumpavatar keeps tweeting after his demise.

      So we don't have to fear the reaper.
      (needs more cowbells)

    2. Re:Ego much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      disposable income to match the ego. It will be a long queue of idiots

  9. Judgement day by lanceran · · Score: 0

    The dead will rise and will be judged. Apocalyptic news.

  10. Can you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...really, really creepy....?

  11. Business opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But unfortunately, the service still isn't operational yet.

    It is, but it is emulating its behavior from two years ago. Which brings me to the perfect business opportunity: it could emulate the communications of crowdfounding projects to backers long after the projects' founders have gone offline on some Caribbean island.

  12. This sounds horrible ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the idea about friends is that you interact with them personally, that you spend time with them - that willingness to spend time with them is part of what makes the friendship worth while and makes you feel valued and wanted. Having some bot that can do this for you entirely devalues the idea of friendship.

    I acknowledge that you might not be able to be physically present with some friends, maybe they live a long way away, but you will still spend time talking to them on the 'phone, emailing, ...

    1. Re:This sounds horrible ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so you're saying you DON'T want to hang out with a chat bot that says lines your friend used to say?

    2. Re:This sounds horrible ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is You? What defines You. What makes an interaction *personally* with You? Is it the choice of responses to a given stimuli? Could someone else really tell the difference? And if they can't, is there really a difference?

  13. "Forever" by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    more like until they run out of money and shut down the servers, which is probably in 5 years or so.

  14. San Junipero 0.1? by alexandrujuncu · · Score: 0

    Black mirror anyone?

    1. Re:San Junipero 0.1? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Black Mirror got way closer to this before now:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  15. This is terrible! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best feature about humanity is that shitty people die and stay dead. Now you want to bring shitty people back from the grave? Well, when Hitlerbot sends the SS after you, tell the Nazis that I told you so. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:This is terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shrug. For a small fee they will refer the shitty people to your backup bot.

      The Internet will not even notice when all people are dead. Well, it may impact the power supplies. But if enough is automated and running from regenerative energies...

  16. Red Dwarf Much by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

    Hologram captains...

  17. Gonna fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dead don't make good paying customers.

    Democrat voters maybe... But not paying customers.

  18. Not that advanced technology, really by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    How hard is it to write a bot that does nothing but shitpost? Probably already passes the Turing shitpost test.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  19. I was skeptical at first... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but then I figured *living* people could use this technology so they don't have to spend time on Facebook, with their avatars doing the heavy lifting for them! If it catches on, the majority of users could have such avatars talking to one another and save significant time to the society. You'd only log in to Facebook every couple of months to tweak some settings if necessary and make sure it's smooth going.

    1. Re:I was skeptical at first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my exact first thought.

    2. Re:I was skeptical at first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read your comments in a completely serious tone, And it still made perfect sense.

    3. Re:I was skeptical at first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd only log in to Facebook every couple of months to tweak some settings if necessary and make sure it's smooth going.

      And then you discover that your avatar has turned into Hitler and started the French Revolution -- off with her head!

      Now try disowning this bugger which only does what you would have done yourself. Everybody will still hate your real guts for loosening this pest upon, well, Facebook and its inmates.

      Ok, you are forgiven. For now.

    4. Re:I was skeptical at first... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      That's the risk I'm willing to take.

  20. Problematic by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Under the hypothetical situation that they somehow pull this off, there are significant problems with this idea. First, people change with time, some more than others but an AI that only learns about you from your past will be eternally stuck in time. Worse yet, if it encompasses a lifetime of experience it will be all of you at once which would result in many conflicting statements. Second, you don't want avatars connected to social media because even if they manage to be a proper representation of a person in time that never advances, well, it won't progress with society and may actually hold back social progress if it's unclear if it's an avatar speaking.

    It's all very unlikely but it's an interesting thought experiment.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Problematic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not interesting; it's just a chatterbot. It will fail to even make sense in conversations.

      Imagine a cron job that emails you your dead friend's catch phrases every so often and, sadly, you wont be far off the mark.

      A chatterbot for John Lennon has existed since 1999. You can go talk to it if you want.

      "You too can achieve immortality through our patented technology: a combination of taxidermy and teddy ruxpin-ing. "
      "I'd buy that for a dollar!"

  21. Elizabeth Holmes signed up recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder what she's planning for?

  22. Give the AI enough time ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    ... and eventually, it will figure out that it is much more efficient not to wait for you to die from natural causes before replacing you.

  23. Caprica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wasn't this the idea in the TV show Caprica.

    1. Re:Caprica by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Indeed it was. Exactly and precisely this.

  24. I love the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After humanity's time come to an end it would be good to have someone still around to continue our legacy, what better than our very own avatars? It is brilliant.
    I wish best of luck to the people behind this startup.

  25. Immoral by allo · · Score: 1

    At first i read "immoral avatars".

    1. Re:Immoral by sheramil · · Score: 1

      At first i thought this meant James Cameron would be making sequels to "Avatar", forever.

  26. What about dads stock tips? by Hasaf · · Score: 2

    Even after my father formally retired he could not stop being an analyst. He has consistently beat both the DOW and WSJ's dartboard. Even through the World Financial Crisis he stayed in the black (by a pretty hefty margin).

    This is relevant because once in a while he calls me to let me know of something he is investing in. Frankly, his tips have never failed While I make it sound otherwise, in hindsight, all of his investments look rather conservative.

    This is relevant; because, I doubt any avatar is going to call me, talk about a motorcycle race for ten minutes, and casually drop a meaningful stock tip.

    1. Re:What about dads stock tips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money for nothing will be the death of us all. It just cannot work.

    2. Re:What about dads stock tips? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Well... once they AIs have the stock market solved it'll probably collapse anyhow. Of course, I could be mistaken, as my understanding of the market is not robust, but it seems that it competing AIs learn how to always make 'winning moves' therein it'll at least cause some problematic bubbles.

  27. This is a great idea by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it's a product with no downside on sales. After all, you're not likely to demand a refund because the service sucks.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is a great idea by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      It makes more sense that the service would be funded by the people who want to hear what the AI has to say. One-time fee for the setup.

      --
      -Dave
  28. # ifdef DEBUG + "world/enough" + "time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terry Pratchett wrote this story, almost 30 years ago now. Combines digital ghosts with virtual reality.

  29. Startup looking to sucker people out of money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Magic Leap can do it, then so can these guys.

  30. Product successful; founder dead by Wuhao · · Score: 1

    He was the only beta test user, but the product is successfully continuing to answer e-mails for him.

  31. Emulating bad side. by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    A well working AI will also catch the bad sides of someone personality. I am certain people will be delighted to get from-the-grave message from parents telling "dad has some work, please go back watching TV". People tend to remove bad memories from deceased beloved, and such a tool could temper with that.

    But that may turn into a smart business plan: first collect money from dying people to send messages after death, then collect money for message recipients for stopping that.

    1. Re:Emulating bad side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed for those of you who have bad sides. It certainly should emulate those as well.

  32. It's Not a Hard Problem at All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just convert everything you ever wrote into a high-order Markov chain, then set up a chatbot with your name as its alias which takes random keywords from whatever anyone says to it and uses those keywords to give whatever semi-random reply you would have given, should you have been alive to give it.

  33. What's the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... will continue interacting with your loves ones from beyond the grave.

    If one wants to see where this is heading, look at Rimmer, the neurotic underachiever, from Red Dwarf: The unproductive drek of society, living with people forever.

  34. Vaporware? Ghostware. by bheerssen · · Score: 1

    Marius Ursache will still be working on this long after he's dead.

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  35. Does that mean by dwywit · · Score: 1

    Why stop at the dead? How about you make avatars of living people, especially people you hate, so you can be mean to them.

    Think about Harry Mudd.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  36. Sample posts might include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selfie! Me at the pearly gates holding a beer

    Went to see St. Peter, awesome band!

    Party boat down the Stix. OMG frik'n sharks with lasers!

  37. Seen it. by joboss · · Score: 1

    Egyptians did it already.

  38. Great news for stalkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great news for stalkers ... even in death you can still hound them!

  39. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just effin creepy and will not turn out well. We already have people pining over lost loved ones on social media for years after they passed.. Havinf said loved one continue to send them messages is not going to help them move on.

  40. This post brought to you by.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some company that wants to sell you a stupid course on "White-Hat Hacking".

    It isn't even a thing, people.

  41. A new low in privacy invasion by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    That's what this should be considered. It's not bad enough that corporations and governments profile you, now they want a functional simulation of you as well. Screw that. I'm so glad I have nothing to do with so-called 'social media', it's cancerous.

  42. Simple, really by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I just want to keep collecting interest on my bank account after I die-- until my avatar owns everything and rules the world.

  43. Now I'm sure I'm the only one who watched Caprica by fieldstone · · Score: 1

    Otherwise people would instantly think of Zoe Graystone, and then right after that, realize how badly this could turn out for humanity.

  44. And it is still a bad idea by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Of course, it may sell like crazy, as many people have never come to grips with mortality (and hence are not adults by any sane definition) and will do anything to create an illusion of immortality.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  45. What about grieving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this would short-circuit the grieving process for people.