Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Might Be Planning To Use Driverless Cars for Delivery (fortune.com)

Amazon could be eyeing driverless car technology as a way to get items to people's doors faster, according to a new report from the Wall Street Journal. From an article: It seems nearly every tech and auto giant are now evaluating autonomous vehicle technology. Google-owner Alphabet recently spun out its self-driving car unit, Waymo, into its own subsidiary. Apple was just granted a license in California to test autonomous vehicles. Ford and General Motors are also doubling down on creating autonomous vehicles. Amazon's ambitions, however, may not be to actually build these cars. Instead, the e-commerce giant has a team of around a dozen employees thinking of ways to potentially use the nascent technology to expand its own retail and logistics operations. Operating fleets of driverless trucks to ship items bought from its marketplace could help lower costs for the company.

121 comments

  1. Cause for concern by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is okay if Amazon's cars are driverless . . .

    . . . as long as they are also self-driving.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Cause for concern by davester666 · · Score: 1

      No, just make them drone cars, and then outsource the driving. Make it an online game: "Get this car from here to here as fast as possible"

      What could go wrong?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And self delivering.

    3. Re:Cause for concern by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      sadly people would probably pay to play that... free shipping if you don't mind a 14 year old remotely driving a car through your lawn grand theft auto style

    4. Re:Cause for concern by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      ... and launching your package with a delivery cannon that sticks out the sunroof.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the Horseless Carriage had a bit more to it than a traditional carriage without horses.

    6. Re:Cause for concern by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Add some electrode brain zapping if Player acts maliciously and you are done! But then software would have to assess if the route is malicious or not... though a few lobotomies as example for the other workers, I mean, Players, would be optimum to omit software assessment and force bona fide on the Gamers. [[Videogames]t->oo = [Work]t->oo = ...].

  2. Driverless cars are a MEME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop falling for it.

    1. Re:Driverless cars are a MEME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And BTW, the new /. format narrowing comments area by adding a margin to the right sucks. Revert back.

    2. Re:Driverless cars are a MEME by fisted · · Score: 2

      The margin seems to serve the purpose of holding the utterly important widget that tells you your name, user id and karma.
      I find that highly useful because I ocasionally forget my name, I would have *no idea* where to look up my userid if I ever needed it, and my karma? It's changing so quickly between "Excellent" and "Excellent" that I'm having a hard time keeping track of it.

      THANK YOU, /., for the new, user experience improving, margin.

      If I might add, a narrower comment section feels more app-grade. Thanks for that, too.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have an app to app. With a margin.

    3. Re:Driverless cars are a MEME by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      What?!? You're saying it's an intended feature!

      I thought it was a bug. Seriously! Not joking.

      So somebody thought this would be a good idea?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:Driverless cars are a MEME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw one in NYC way before the hype started and thought it was a delusional state... ;-)

  3. and all of the out of work trucks well just hold t by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and all of the out of work trucks well just hold up the auto drive cars to get food and other stuff that they need.

  4. Re:and all of the out of work trucks well just hol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all of the out of work trucks well just hold up the auto drive cars to get food and other stuff that they need.

    didn't you ever see maximum overdrive?

  5. Theft? by rs1n · · Score: 1

    There's the question of how the car/truck is going to stop being targeted for theft. I am sure that these cars would be programmed to stop when people are standing in their way -- which would be a perfect way to steal delivery goods. Just have a group of people surround the car/truck at a stop light, and then you pretty much own a bunch of new toys from Amazon. I'll believe it when I see it, I guess.

    1. Re:Theft? by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Presumably they can use one of the many cameras on the device to record the criminals and report them to law enforcement. In this sense, they're less vulnerable than any human-driven truck without a camera.

      It's easy to mug me when I'm walking down the sidewalk, but most people don't do it.

    2. Re:Theft? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If that's a concern, why not just drop any Amazon markings? At that point, the car would be indistinguishable from any other self-driving car on the road. It's possible that self-driving cars in general may become targets, but as another poster has already pointed out, the fact that they're pretty much guaranteed to record the crime in great detail will act as a deterrent for most would-be thieves, I should think.

    3. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the question of how the car/truck is going to stop being targeted for theft. I am sure that these cars would be programmed to stop when people are standing in their way -- which would be a perfect way to steal delivery goods. Just have a group of people surround the car/truck at a stop light, and then you pretty much own a bunch of new toys from Amazon. I'll believe it when I see it, I guess.

      A human driver isn't going to commit vehicular homocide to protect the cargo either, no no real change there.

    4. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when I jam the car, steal the goods and torch it.

      all for at least 45$ in goods!

    5. Re:Theft? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and when people become criminals as inmates get more then people on street how are we going to pay for that?

    6. Re:Theft? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Considering how many criminals post their crimes on Facebook, I wouldn't be so sure.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Theft? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You make a compelling point. I suppose I forget just how stupid people really can be.

    8. Re:Theft? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      What is stopping someone from robbing a human driven UPS truck with the same tactic?

    9. Re:Theft? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      You are so brave.

  6. your front door by ronaldg · · Score: 0

    ...and how are the products making their way to your front door from the driverless vehicle?

    1. Re:your front door by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Or, here in New England, the side door. (The front door is only for brides and undertakers)

      That was my concern too. Drop them around the mailbox like the fscking catalog people do? Guess where I will not be ordering from, then.

    2. Re:your front door by Aeros · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was wondering. - A little robot - Slingshot device (my favorite) - Automated call to customer (yo, come pick your shit up from the truck outside) and have item(s) in a cage to prevent theft of other customers items in delivery truck

    3. Re:your front door by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      and how are they getting into my house and out of the box and into my hands without me having to get off the sofa? This driverless thing will never work, obviously.

    4. Re:your front door by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, upgraded version 2.0 of the driver-less truck will drive right up to your sofa...

    5. Re:your front door by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With a drone of course. The notion of having amazon fly a drone from the their DC to your house is ridiculous, but parking a small truck in your neighborhood and having a half dozen drones take flight from it is way more efficient.

  7. Where are the robots... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Once you have fully operational self-driving cars, robots will roam up and down the hallways of apartment complexes to deliver packages. Like the food dispenser robots in Judge Dredd (Stallone).

    1. Re:Where are the robots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you have fully operational self-driving cars, robots will roam up and down the hallways of apartment complexes to deliver packages. Like the food dispenser robots in Judge Dredd (Stallone).

      There's more to Dredd than just Stallone & Urban!
      In fact, the Stallone Dredd was blasphemous.

  8. So how does the item get from the car to the door? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  9. Driverless way out there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe in 5 yeas we will see Amazon or somebody else have a limited market with these things but they won't become ubiquitous for at bleasr 20 years.

    Even the cars. I'll keep my new car for another 20 years and then, I'm gonna buy what I can afford.

  10. No drivers, just deliver-people? by lionchild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, Amazon will use driverless cars to deliver goods. How do you suppose those goods get from the car, to the 3rd floor apartment, or in onto the porch of the house, or if there are special instructions, through the gate and onto the step at the back door? A drone based in the vehicle? I think you're going to have to have someone involved there to get the package to where it needs to go.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    1. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two possibilities I can think of:

      1. They will deliver to a central location and humans will drive it last mile.

      2. You will get a special price if you walk out to the car to get the package. If not you can pay the special premium human delivery fee.

      I'm sure there are many more ideas coming from this team who's sole responsibility is to figure out how to best use this new technology.

    2. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my house all it has to do is beep the horn I will get the box.
      Sorry about your luck.

    3. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      There are countless ways to solve this. It's a good thing you're not in charge of the project, not that you're even putting any effort into solving your own hypothetical problems.

      The easiest and most obvious is that the vehicles will just stop outside of the house/apartment and the person will walk to the street and unlock the package with a phone.

    4. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The special price for picking it up at the curb is free. As you say, for premium delivery options you will have to pay, just as you do now.

    5. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Easiest...for Amazon. Not for the customer. I would not order from Amazon if they did this. So I don't think it's as easy as you're trying to make it out to be.

    6. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. A drone flies/drives it the last few feet from the car to your doorstop. Since it's no longer flying across a city Amazon no longer has to deal with the drone legislation issues. Drone then automatically docks and recharges from the car.

    7. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 2

      Then you will be in the 1% of people who would rather pay $5 for shipping rather than walk 20 ft from the door to the curb and have no charge.

      Having an Amazon locker right outside your front door is a vastly superior option for most people than what they are currently doing. There will always be exceptions, but just expect to pay extra to be in that tiny minority.

    8. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Some sort of air cannon would do the trick. Like the ones they use to shoot t-shirts at stadiums.

    9. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      These serve the dual purpose of defending against the mobs that will clearly be swarming these delivery vehicles.

    10. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by lionchild · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The easiest and most obvious is that the vehicles will just stop outside of the house/apartment and the person will walk to the street and unlock the package with a phone.

      So, they will they only make deliveries when I'm home? Meaning the bulk of the fleet would operate after hours in the window from 6PM to 9PM, when people are home, but not yet in bed. I'm not sure this approach would work well for the average person with a 8AM to 5PM job.

      However, if they -do- deliver it when I plan to be home, nights, weekends, etc.. and I set the delivery time and they adhere to it, that could work.

      --
      Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    11. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by kiminator · · Score: 1

      A drone based in the vehicle sounds like the most likely solution to me. They could even have a few drones, depending.

      Presumably they'd have users set out small emitters that tell the drones where to leave the packages, perhaps a Beacon or similar device. They could also have a number of differently-sized drones to handle packages of different sizes, though large packages would probably still have to be delivered by hand, I'm sure they'd just offload those duties to UPS for FedEx or similar.

      I'm really, really skeptical that a solution like this could be cheaper than a human driver any time soon. They might be able to make it cheaper in medium-density urban environments by virtue of the trucks being faster by spending less time stopped, especially if they can deliver multiple packages at once using multiple drones. But I bet that will take time.

    12. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would I pay that? With Prime, I already pay no shipping. Why would I pay $5 more for a service I'm already getting? You're also vastly underestimating the convenience factor.

      An Amazon locker? Why would I have one? Amazon already delivers to my doorstep.

    13. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: They won't. It's ALL JUST ANOTHER MEME. It's advertising hype. Amazon is just piling on for the publicity, like everyone else. There aren't going to be driverless ANYTHING for real for a LONG TIME TO COME, IF EVER. Stop falling for the "self driving car" meme!

    14. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      This doesn't solve for the extremely common case where the recipient isn't home to take delivery.

    15. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that this will be used for some sort of priority same-hour delivery service where the receiver is actively waiting on site for the package, similar to what they planned for their drones:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXo_d6tNWuY

      Like in the video you're waiting and get a text message or app alert saying the car is a couple of minutes out, go get ready to meet it on the street. Once it's there, they'll probably have some sort of array of boxes on the rear of the vehicle like at the Amazon drop centers in malls, you type in the PIN given to you by the delivery alert and the appropriate box unlocks and opens, you retrieve your stuff, close the door and the vehicle departs.

    16. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      So you have the odd belief that nothing ever changes? That Amazon won't ever change the terms of its shipping policies? That seems like a bad position to hold if you have any knowledge of history (or sense of the passage of time)?

      Amazon is always trying to lower its shipping costs and will make policy changes that reduce costs while keeping its most profitable customers. It is unclear how they will change pricing, whether it is raising the cost of prime, increasing minimum orders, or providing other incentives to use cheaper options.

      Putting an Amazon locker outside your front door will be significantly cheaper than having a human drive around and pick each package out of truck and walk it up to your door, ring your doorbell, wait ,.... You have a serious delusion if you don't think you are paying for that somehow.

    17. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      There will be many options and it will take some sorting out to find the right balance. Again, the most obvious solution is that trucks are loaded up with deliveries for a given area and you are alerted when your package is out for delivery. When you respond by saying that you are home, the truck will drive to your house in a few minutes and you will be alerted to come out and retrieve your package.

    18. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 0

      If the person is never home how does the box get inside your house? Seems like the current system (that you seem to favor) also has this flaw. I'd rather the package be safely on the truck, rather than sitting outside my house for years on end.

    19. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Nice movement of the goalpost. My initial response is that this isn't as easy as you were making it out to be. Now you're accusing me of holding the idea of "nothing ever changes". So I'm not even going to respond to your first line.

      Amazon could make the change. But then someone could along and offer the traditional "shipping-and-deliver-to-your-door" for the same price that they offer it today. That's great if Amazon wants to lower shipping costs. But you haven't really made a case why that would involve paying Amazon extra money if they're already lowering the shipping cost.

      I'm not really sure what your "locker" argument is. Amazon already delivers to my door. Why would I need a locker? You haven't explained how, with automated driving, the package gets from the vehicle to my door (or locker, since it really doesn't matter).

    20. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that I favor the current system, my point was that not being home to accept delivery is a very common use case. In those cases, the package can be left in a location specified by the recipient, or left with a neighbor - as the major package handlers do today.

    21. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Nice movement of the goalpost. My initial response is that this isn't as easy as you were making it out to be. Now you're accusing me of holding the idea of "nothing ever changes". So I'm not even going to respond to your first line.

      I never said it was easy, just easiest (and most obvious) of all the options. All solutions are hard or everyone else would have done them already. Yes, I will accuse you again of the idea "nothing ever changes" because you can't seem to wrap your head around the concept that once much cheaper shipping options are available that will change how shipping is priced. Yet you continue to claim, "I like it just the way it is, so this will never work."

      Amazon could make the change. But then someone could along and offer the traditional "shipping-and-deliver-to-your-door" for the same price that they offer it today.

      Hardly. There is currently nobody who can beat Amazon on shipping costs. When they have a driverless mobile locker system that is significantly cheaper, who do you think will step in and be able to beat Amazon on price of goods and shipping costs? You're delusional, Amazon will eat their lunch.

      That's great if Amazon wants to lower shipping costs. But you haven't really made a case why that would involve paying Amazon extra money if they're already lowering the shipping cost.

      How do you not understand this? There are two shipping options, one costs Amazon half what the other does. Do you really think that they will continue indefinitely to charge the customers the same for those two shipping options?

      I'm not really sure what your "locker" argument is. Amazon already delivers to my door. Why would I need a locker? You haven't explained how, with automated driving, the package gets from the vehicle to my door (or locker, since it really doesn't matter).

      This just keeps going over your head. The locker is ON the vehicle. You walk to the vehicle. Unlock the locker. Retrieve the package. A huge number of people use Amazon lockers, many more will when those lockers are right outside their door. Especially because it will be much cheaper (or faster or safer or ...) than the existing options.

    22. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      But the person has to be at home at SOME point, correct? Why have a neighbor hold your package or leave it unsecured on your porch if you can just pick it up off the truck that is parked outside your house?

    23. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Some of us work for a living and are not home all day to wait for a package. Right now UPS, USPS, and FedEx drivers leave my packages inside of my car in the driveway. If the packages are left on the front step, they are in full view of thieves. I'd rarely ever receive anything if a driverless car or drone left packages on the front step, and if it's raining, all those packages the thieves didn't get would be soaking wet.

      Thanks, but no thanks.

    24. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to pay more, you can continue to have humans do that for you. Or you could take the choice that almost everyone else will and choose the cheaper option that is far more reliable, convenient and secure. That is having the package delivered to the street outside your home and you opening the door and walking 20 feet to take it off the drone truck that's waiting patiently for you. I'm sure the existing drivers appreciate you subsidizing them in a nearly useless job.

    25. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay that? With Prime, I already pay no shipping.

      Why would I pay to check my luggage? That's included with my ticket.

    26. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make sense. You paid to check your luggage as part of your ticket...and then you pay an extra fee to check your luggage? Some airlines don't check any bags for free and you are charged. Do you want to show me an airline that double-dips like this (charges you to check luggage in the price of the ticket and then charges again)?

    27. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

    28. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The delivery child/ape won't have to know how to drive, just ride in the car and tug the boxes up to your door.

    29. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Are you too young to remember what flying was like fifteen years ago or are you just obtuse?

    30. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (can't be bothered to log in on my phone)

      Sure, but part of the convenience factor for home delivery is that I don't have to be there. I suppose if they can accurately schedule delivery time at my convenience this would be a desirable service, but if it's anything like "we'll deliver during a four hour window", no thanks.

      Currently, to solve this problem, I generally have parcels of any real value delivered to my office, also a use case where a driverless vehicle isn't going to work well if at all.

    31. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about today, so what point are you trying to make?

    32. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      So the answer is "just obtuse" then.

    33. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Nice movement of the goalpost. My initial response is that this isn't as easy as you were making it out to be. Now you're accusing me of holding the idea of "nothing ever changes". So I'm not even going to respond to your first line.

      I never said it was easy, just easiest (and most obvious) of all the options. All solutions are hard or everyone else would have done them already. Yes, I will accuse you again of the idea "nothing ever changes" because you can't seem to wrap your head around the concept that once much cheaper shipping options are available that will change how shipping is priced. Yet you continue to claim, "I like it just the way it is, so this will never work."

      I think you're having problems with wrapping your head around why a customer would pay more for a more money for an inconvenient option, when the cost of that shipment is lower from the automation. You're making gigantic assumptions, so I don't think this conversation is really going anywhere. I'm telling you it's is not an easy answer. You're assuming that means that I think that means there are no and never will be any other options. You're having a really hard time with reading comprehension.

      Amazon could make the change. But then someone could along and offer the traditional "shipping-and-deliver-to-your-door" for the same price that they offer it today.

      Hardly. There is currently nobody who can beat Amazon on shipping costs. When they have a driverless mobile locker system that is significantly cheaper, who do you think will step in and be able to beat Amazon on price of goods and shipping costs? You're delusional, Amazon will eat their lunch.

      I don't have to be home now for Amazon. With your system, I'd have to home. With the current system, I can just answer my door. With your system, there is more work involved with the customer. You have made no case for how yours is an easier solution for customer.

      That's great if Amazon wants to lower shipping costs. But you haven't really made a case why that would involve paying Amazon extra money if they're already lowering the shipping cost.

      How do you not understand this? There are two shipping options, one costs Amazon half what the other does. Do you really think that they will continue indefinitely to charge the customers the same for those two shipping options?

      One more time. Why would I pay more for a shipping option that saves Amazon money and is more hassle for me?

      I'm not really sure what your "locker" argument is. Amazon already delivers to my door. Why would I need a locker? You haven't explained how, with automated driving, the package gets from the vehicle to my door (or locker, since it really doesn't matter).

      This just keeps going over your head. The locker is ON the vehicle. You walk to the vehicle. Unlock the locker. Retrieve the package. A huge number of people use Amazon lockers, many more will when those lockers are right outside their door. Especially because it will be much cheaper (or faster or safer or ...) than the existing options.

      Hey, thank you for finally explaining that! FYI, you never explained that the lockers would be on the vehicle. But even then, like I said above, I don't have to be home for Amazon to deliver a package today; your method would require I be home, as well as just put in more effort.

      If it lowers the price for customers in some way, sure, I could see that catching on. But if it increases the price, I don't see how it would.

    34. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      No, you're just communicating poorly.

    35. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      I think you're having problems with wrapping your head around why a customer would pay more for a more money for an inconvenient option, when the cost of that shipment is lower from the automation. You're making gigantic assumptions, so I don't think this conversation is really going anywhere.

      "pay more for a more money for an inconvenient option" What in God's holy name are you blathering about? If you're asking why people would pay more to have a package dropped on their porch than walk 20 feet to pick it up at the street. I don't know, that's what you're claiming. I'm saying the mobile locker concept is more secure, more reliable and cheaper. You'll have to defend your own words, not keep intentionally distorting mine.

      I don't have to be home now for Amazon. With your system, I'd have to home. With the current system, I can just answer my door. With your system, there is more work involved with the customer. You have made no case for how yours is an easier solution for customer.

      You don't have to be home? So you just let Amazon packages pile up on your porch for months on end? It's more "involved" to click an alert on your phone telling Amazon that you're home? Yeah, that seems like such a terrible burden. Compare that to all the other hassles in having packages delivered to your door on THEIR schedule and the not insignificant risk of packages stolen or damaged. You seem to be oblivious about this happening as well, but rest assured even if this rarely happens to you, you are paying for it by increased cost of goods or shipping.

      One more time. Why would I pay more for a shipping option that saves Amazon money and is more hassle for me?

      One more time. You're an idiot. Driverless mobile lockers save Amazon money (or make faster deliveries - same thing), that is why they are pursuing this technology (or something along those lines). If you want your package carried by a human and lovingly presented to you then you will have to pay more. More than you do now? NO, NO, NO. Again, let me emphasize that you are an idiot. IN THE FUTURE when you have an option the one that is more expensive to operate will cost YOU more. How have you made it through life with such poor grasp of the world?

      Hey, thank you for finally explaining that! FYI, you never explained that the lockers would be on the vehicle.

      You never asked for the details. If you don't understand something ASK! Look I'm not building the system and trying to sell it to you. If you are genuinely curious and not being an asshat you would 1) put a tiny bit of thought of your own into it before claiming it won't work 2) politely ask those who know more than you do to explain it in more detail rather than spending all your time coming up with the most asinine interpretation of what others are saying.

      But even then, like I said above, I don't have to be home for Amazon to deliver a package today; your method would require I be home

      By "home" do you mean P.O. Box? Because I actually live in my home, I show up there at some point on most days. Why you are having packages delivered to a place that you are never physically at is mind boggling.

    36. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      This is not 1980. When you ARE home you will tell MAL (the Mobile Amazon Locker) and it will arrive very quickly and/or give you a very small window (like 15 minutes) and you will be able to track it very closely. Then you will have a reasonable amount of time to come collect your package (maybe 5 minutes, maybe a lot longer). This is many times more convenient and secure than the current norm.

    37. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Who is communicating poorly? You can't even seem to keep track of who you're talking to.

    38. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I'm keeping track just fine. Why do you say that?

    39. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in fact you pay a discounted shipping rate to the tune of ($99 - Whatever You Think The Other Prime Services are Worth) / Number of Deliveries Per Year, every year. That amount may be $0 if you believe in Prime's other services to the tune of what you pay, but in that case you're a fool.

      So you would rather pay that amount, whatever that is, rather than nothing. (At least until Amazon regularizes drone delivery enough and has to pay for the next generation of delivery hardware and won't eat that cost and doesn't have the cost offset in saved labor/delivery fees anymore.)

      And I suspect that Amazon will mount their drop points in places and then email you an unlock code for it, so that the locker could be shared.

    40. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      "communicating poorly" == "not explaining as if I were a 5 year old"

      Apparently.

    41. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Oh I don't know. I guess I should have just explained my analogy to airline baggage fees more clearly. Apparently I was just "communicating poorly" when I did that.

    42. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      No, your concept is just moronic. I'll try one more time before I give up.

      With a Prime membership, I don't pay any further shipping charges for two-day shipping. Zero. No dollars. Amazon will deliver the package to my door, whether I'm home or not (there is an argument that I'm paying for shipping by buying the Prime membership, but I guess it comes down to how much one uses it, but it's a flat rate, so really depends on the person).

      You said:

      Then you will be in the 1% of people who would rather pay $5 for shipping rather than walk 20 ft from the door to the curb and have no charge.

      Amazon would make the switch as a cost-cutting strategy, so that it doesn't cost them as much to ship the package. So it's costs them less. But from where I quoted you, you threw out the $5 amount; $5 to [walk 20 feet from my door] rather than have it delivered to my door.

      My point is that, with Prime, I pay $0 for shipping, to have it shipped to my door, and the package is left at the door.

      Your point appears to be that, I can pay $5 more for driverless shipping, but I have to fetch the package from the vehicle.

      Maybe this was just an off-the-cuff figure you threw out. Maybe you didn't fully communicate your idea. But when you put my point vs your point, your point doesn't seem like the better option.

      Now, if the way I've summarized your point doesn't actually reflect your point, please, feel free to correct me.

    43. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Your point appears to be that, I can pay $5 more for driverless shipping, but I have to fetch the package from the vehicle.

      Is English not your first language? Or even your third? That is nowhere near my point.

      My point is that you're an idiot. More importantly an obnoxious idiot. If you were a polite idiot I would respond kindly to you. You have not understood ANY part of this conversation. Contrast that with Silver... who understood the whole point of my argument without having it spoon fed to him/her, yet you continue to be both obtuse and obnoxious.

    44. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Then don't write stupid shit like this in the future:

      Then you will be in the 1% of people who would rather pay $5 for shipping rather than walk 20 ft from the door to the curb and have no charge.

      Makes you look like an absolute moron.

    45. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Yet you are the moron who reads that as someone will have to pay $5 to pick it up from the curb. Do you honestly not see the word "RATHER" in there. You know, like it is either this OR that? You really need to find smarter friends; people who will walk you through simple concepts like boolean logic.

    46. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean with prime you actually already pay monthly shipping before hand

    47. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      I will grant you that your absolute confidence in your moronic opinion made me go look up the word "rather," in case there was an archaic or obscure meaning of the word that I was missing. But no, there isn't, you're just an idiot who can't read a simple sentence.

    48. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Still puzzling out the difference between the Boolean operators AND and OR? I expect you'll choose to remain ignorant RATHER THAN educate yourself. Oh well.

    49. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      The current, human delivery is going to cost more in the future you fucking idiot. Today it is free, but it won't always be that way.

      Some things cost more or less today than they did in the past. You already understand this concept, you just aren't applying it to this subject because you're dumb.

    50. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      You haven't provided any information on why this would be the case. You continually miss the entire point. I'll repeat it for you since you're having a very difficult time grasping it (it's not a terribly hard concept).

      Amazon would make the switch since it saves money. If it costs Amazon less money, why would they charge more for it? If they do, they open things up for someone to do what they're already doing.

      Try again, moron.

    51. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Jesus. Are you just trolling? No-one could be this stupid.

    52. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by fedos · · Score: 1

      How will operating the fleet between 6 and 9 PM not work for people who work 8 AM - 5 PM? This system could actually make it less likely to have missed deliveries.

    53. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by fedos · · Score: 1

      They could better work schedules around when people are home than they can with human drivers. They might actually eliminate the problem of the recipient not being home.

    54. Re: No drivers, just deliver-people? by fedos · · Score: 1

      How are people not seeing this as the most likely scenario? Everyone seems to be thinking that it will operate exactly like it does today, only without a driver.

    55. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by fedos · · Score: 1

      Then the package will come to when you are home.

    56. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to go to the vehicle to pick up your package, you must actually be home. As it is right now, I can be at work or whatever, and Amazon will leave it on my doorstep. That doesn't work if I have to be physically present.

    57. Re:No drivers, just deliver-people? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      Once again. If you are NEVER home, why are you having packages delivered there! They will just pile up uselessly on your porch. Sheesh.

  11. Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who owns a delivery or livery fleet is looking at the possibility long term. I suspect regulations and edge cases will delay this to at least 2030 but eventually this will come. In Amazon's case I'm sure it will also involve a mini robot that will take the package from the truck to the door. Probably several of them at once so it can circle back and pick up some.

    I expect those same mini robot's to arrive much sooner, as they can be used in the warehouse and are being used right now. Expect the vast number of people employed in their warehouses to drop 90% (or at least the number of employees per package to drop that amount - the way amazon keeps growing year to year the new warehouses will offset that. Forget about WalMart, amazon is the small *and* large town job destroyer.)

  12. Re:and all of the out of work trucks well just hol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trucking companies are not gonna all just scrap their fleets and fire their owner operators overnight when driverless vehicles become practical. You don't scrap millions f dollars of equipment just because something new comes along.

    The hype regarding driverless vehicles is getting to 1999 asinine Silicon Valley levels. Anyone who thinks this is gonna be everywhere in a few years has been suckered by someone's publicity department - probably someone who's driving his 13 year old company not the ground and wants to distract his shareholders from all of their money he's losing.

  13. So... by hbean · · Score: 1

    How long until the average person realizes that it's robots taking the jobs not the Mexicans/immigrants. And then the problem becomes what can we build a wall around to stop them?

    --
    "Give someone a program, frustrate them for a day... Teach someone to program, frustrate them for a lifetime."
    1. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the robots you are referring to don't actually exist. You really need to get off of the internet now and again. This article is hypothetical, nothing is actually happening.

    2. Re:So... by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      We do what we've always done. Pit the "Mexicans" and the robots against each other and let them fight it out so we can feel superior.

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Looks out window at a field full of Mexicans..........."

      "Looks out window at field full of robots............... that don't exist yet"

      Yeah them robots sure are everywhere

    4. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the progress in real driverless cars it might not be here today but certainly is conceivable in the next 10-20 years.

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really simple. The wall needs to be built around the headquarters of companies who have a business model of putting people out of work for no damned good reason other than some other geeks think it's cool. I'm really sorry for all the talentless basement dweller "futurists" out there, but putting everyone out of work is not going to make your worthless lives any better, it's not going to magically guarantee you an income every month to continue to be worthless, it's not going to do any good at all. What it is going to do is cause mass suffering, despair, and ultimately a civil war as people decide they're tired of the rich owning absolutely everything.

      "But you can't stop progress". Bullshit we can't. It's called laws. Corporations are afraid of them. That's why they spend so much money lobbying. What CEOs don't want I want more of. We have an economy to serve people, not the other way around, despite the brainwashing some people believe.

      Amazon has not started doing this yet, and a lot of dumb unrealized ideas are just exactly that, so I'm not saying get out the pitchforks yet. However, we need to stop patronizing businesses that put people out of work. Period. That and proper and extensive regulation of automation are the only ways to preserve what is ours. Now, if these same people want to come up with a post-work world that actually will, pardon the pun, work--without leaving 10 mega billionaires in charge of everything in sight then fine, propose that, get it adopted, and then have at it. Until then, changing one side of an equation always results in a massive imbalance. That imbalance is not going to favor any of you reading this. Grow up and realize that.

    6. Re:So... by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah fuck technology. Let's revert back to the stone age.

    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look in any factory. How many Mexicans do you see? How many machines?

    8. Re:So... by nsuccorso · · Score: 1

      Yes, clearly those are the only two options. In no way is this a false dichotomy.

    9. Re:So... by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      You say this to the guy who is responding to "putting everyone out of work is not going to make your worthless lives any better." Right, he's the one with the false dichotomy.

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do what we've always done. Pit the "Mexicans" and the robots against each other and let them fight it out so we can feel superior.

      Will the robots wear colorful masks, too, or just the Mexicans?

  14. Amazon and reality collide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it really matter what Amazon is 'planning'? I was 'planning' on taking Jenna Coleman to dinner on Saturday, but oh, reality. Yawn.

  15. Re:and all of the out of work trucks well just hol by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

    Judging from the amount of money thrown at the problem and results shown so far the driverless cars will be on the roads quite soon, pending local legislation etc, but this decade or early next decade looks very realistic. Will anyone scrap the existing fleets overnight? Obviously not, it will take more than a few years to switch over, nobody could even manufacture that many driverless cars/trucks in a short time, but it will still be a very big change happening relatively fast if the cost benefit plays out as expected.

  16. The MACHINE Starts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are witnessing the start of The Machine from the classic sci-fi story The Machine Stops. We can all sit in our apartments and never see each other face to face. Our jobs will be to entertain each other via social media while The Machine takes care of our basic needs.

  17. This is really weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the 3D printing revolution meant we can just download what we want and 3D print it at home?

    Have I been mislead? Should I also dump my asteroid mining stocks?

  18. I live in an apt building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this help me?

  19. Re:and all of the out of work trucks well just hol by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    The driver hours (and possibly lower insurance costs) mean that it can be economic to just scrap a working vehicle. However, another reasonable option for the more expensive vehicles would be a retrofit kit.

  20. Re:and all of the out of work trucks well just hol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    why would they scrap perfectly viable trucks/cars? it's going to be a matter of adding some software attached to a few motors to control the throttle/steering of an existing vehicle. (The software is the hard part to figure out, while being very cheap to reproduce once sorted out.)

  21. Electronic gate by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    The first time they run into my electronic gate on the property, there will be trouble.

    1. Re:Electronic gate by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You only have a gate on your property? How did it get past the gate and the guard at the entrance to the subdivision let alone the gate at the end of the driveway.

      Yes gate in my gated community, I dont trust these rich fuckers, and it helps keep the asshole retired guys on the HOA board off my fucking lawn and away from the house.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Electronic gate by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Umm no, a gate is not the only thing. 200 acres, barbwire, posted no trespassing signs at the required 100 ft. intervals. You know, the prerequisite of "If you are not invited I can legally shoot your ass".

    3. Re:Electronic gate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I wonder if HOA rules will let me shoot the paint in the ass old men that are trying to measure my lawn.
      The world would be a better place without them.

  22. Like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Hope they are better... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Than their current delivery people. Leaving my package by the road? YOu lazy moron in a rusted out minivan, walk that thing to the door and press the doorbell button.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Amazon is in the logistics business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much like McDonald's being in real estate, Amazon functionally is in the logistics business on their non-AWS side. Look at their warehouse ops, and their toe dipping into airplane rental and ocean shipping. They fully understand that automation is critical, and automation involves massive computation (now AKA cloud).

    Classic example is flight planning for air taxi's effectively killed the last big push for that industry, because the scheduling is a computationally hard problem. One you get over that, air taxis could probably work as an industry with okay margins. Most air taxi startups from that period employed some real heavyweights in the database design world and some rockstar programmers, and while those companies died, their work did trickle out elsewhere.

    So, the moment Boston Dynamics makes a package delivery bot that operates like their Handle prototype (main arms hold a parcel carrier, plus a sub arm or two to open doors and ring doorbells), and level 5 fully autonomous cargo delivery trucks become a thing, Amazon will go for the throat of all delivery companies and invest a huge amount in their own logistics company. Such a delivery logistics company will have such a huge advantage (almost no regular employees, maybe some mechanical turkers to control delivery bots in difficult situations or for customer service, no unions, no pension obligations at start)(reduced cost access to cloud computation for delivery/logistics flow planning) that even the big boys like UPS/FedEx will be hard pressed to follow. Which would effectively kill them, along with many warehousing firms. Small businesses would be effectively forced to warehouse and deliver with Amazon due to the raw cost advantage alone. Amazon will effectively become a major business monopoly in logistics.

    In china, this end to end control is also achievable with Alibaba and their AliCloud offering.

  25. animal jam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blog or and best that is extremely useful to keep I can share the ideas of the future as this is really what I was looking for, I am very comfortable and pleased to come here. Thank you very much.
    animal jam | five nights at freddy's | hotmail login