Slashdot Mirror
China is Recruiting 20,000 People To Write Its Own Wikipedia (vice.com)
The Chinese government is recruiting 20,000 people to create an online encyclopedia that will be the country's own, China-centric version of Wikipedia, or as one official put it, like "a Great Wall of culture." From a report: Known as the "Chinese Encyclopedia," the country's national encyclopedia will go online for the first time in 2018, and the government has employed tens of thousands of scholars from universities and research institutes who will contribute articles in more than 100 disciplines. The end result will be a knowledge base with more than 300,000 entries, each of which will be about 1,000 words long. "The Chinese Encyclopaedia is not a book, but a Great Wall of culture," Yang Muzhi, the editor-in-chief of the project and the chairman of the Book and Periodicals Distribution Association of China, said. He added that China was under pressure from the international community to produce an encyclopedia that will "guide and lead the public and society."
costs $10000
I have a copy of Encarta 97 if that would give them a head start...
Here's the twist: they plagiarize directly from Wikipedia.
I guess some of the children currently sewing Donald Trump's knee-length neck ties will have to take a break and write Wikipedia articles.
It's nice that they are getting a break, because it's exhausting sewing abnormally long neck ties all day.
How does someone with such tiny hands even tie a neck tie? And why is does his tie hang down so low? What is down there that could make Moscow Donald feel insecure?
China was under pressure from the international community to produce an encyclopedia that will "guide and lead the public and society."
Oh prease me need chinee encycropedia
China believes it is the only legitimate country on Earth and behaves accordingly.
Start with fake news: China was under pressure from the international community to produce an encyclopedia that will "guide and lead the public and society."
and so is chinkypedia.com
They should hire Encarta team ... and watch Dan Pink ted talk (https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_on_motivation).
Will it have hookers and blackjack?
Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
The Chinese government feeling they need to create their own new encyclopedia to "guide the people" immediately reminds me of them making the new edition of the Newspeak Dictionary from 1984...
I do look forward to the time when China can grow up and face it's real history.
You get U.S. history, warts and all as a freshman in college.
It's kinda painful how ignorant of U.S. history people with a high school degree can be at times.
Then picture a billion chinese with a similar depth of knowledge about their countries history (even recent stuff).
She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
....it already exists, and they are free to write/edit it themselves
There are over 30,000 registered users in the English Wikipedia.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
How do you translate "All Glory to the Hypnotoad!" into Chinese? It won't be complete without it.
as history is always written by the victors
I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
What else is there to say?
Maybe Maduro can get some of his better fed Chavistas to make a Bolivarian wikipedia and spare us all our misguided views about the fabulous success of the revolution.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
You thought Wikipedia vandalism was bad? Just wait until you see this when the Communist Chinese government gets done vandalizing reality.
and who will be able to update pages ?
And then they'll have to retract half of it...
Would Chinese Wikipedia then be losing 1/6 of its user base? Analogous to the Turkish version.
I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
as history is continually rewritten by the victors
If they're using the wikipedia model, I expect their volunteer contributors will dwindle once the government starts imprisoning authors of edits they don't like.
Navigate to http://permission/ Denied].cn
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
Will it include all of the culture that China tried to purge and destroy with its Great Leap Forward?
How is this a wiki? Its a liki, the entries will be from whoever lick's the govt. ass best.
Drama is always played by the actors.
Just wait until you get a look at the Chinese version.
Entire episodes of Chinese history will be washed away.
I think it is a good idea. As Chinese proverb puts it: "Let a hundred flowers blossom".
The second country to invest in alternate facts, apart from the USA. :)
Truth is malleable. If you have enough guns and media control you write history... To paraphrase Napolean, HISTORY is just the set of lies that the winners got together and chose to believe. In 25 years after the Chinese have conquered the West, your children will be looking down on you and asking how you could be so stupid and believe all those lies that you wrote in those biased inaccurate propaganda filled accounts on WIKIPEDIA. THEY will do this in a manner similar to how you look down on all those Nazis who killed all those Jews.
No shit, sherlock.
Wikipedia has enough editors who do remove junk edits very quickly.
Back in the 1400s, when China sent large groups of ships around the globe, they distributed copies of their 'encyclopedias' as gifts to leaders of other countries they visited. Many inventions credited to Leonardo da Vinci came from such reference materials. It's nice to see that original spirit live on today.
So now we'll have marxapedia to contrast with conservapedia..
A fitting addition to the age of Fake News and Alternative Facts.
So now we'll have 2 versions - one for Chinese propaganda and one for Israeli propaganda - both filled with inaccuracies and disinformation.
That isn't how Wikipedia works; that's how Nupedia worked.
Unlike Wikipedia, Nupedia was not a wiki; it was instead characterized by an extensive peer-review process, designed to make its articles of a quality comparable to that of professional encyclopedias. Nupedia wanted scholars (ideally with PhDs) to volunteer content. Before it ceased operating, Nupedia produced 25 approved articles that had completed its review process (three articles also existed in two versions of different lengths), and 74 more articles were in progress
If they want their own Wikipedia, they can't be restricting the pool of authors and trying to exercise top-down control on the content. OTOH, if they want Nupedia, they are on the right track.
Nupedia was designed by committee, with experts to predefine the rules, and it approved only 21 articles in its first year, compared to Wikipedia posting 200 articles in the first month, and 18,000 in the first year
Good luck with that, China.