Slashdot Mirror


Officials Fear Russia Could Try To Target United States Through Kaspersky AV (go.com)

Russia's growing aggression toward the United States has deepened concerns among U.S. officials that Russian spies might try to exploit one of the world's most respected cybersecurity firms to snoop on Americans or sabotage key U.S. systems, according to an ABC News investigation. From the report: Products from the company, Kaspersky Lab, based in Moscow, are widely used in homes, businesses and government agencies throughout the United States, including the Bureau of Prisons. Kaspersky Lab's products are stocked on the shelves of Target and Best Buy, which also sells laptops loaded by manufacturers with the firm's anti-virus software. But in a secret memorandum sent last month to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Senate Intelligence Committee raised possible red flags about Kaspersky Lab and urged the intelligence community to address potential risks posed by the company's powerful market position. "This [is an] important national security issue," declared the bipartisan memorandum, described to ABC News by congressional sources.

173 comments

  1. Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Puuuuh-leeeeze!

    1. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being evil Rooskie means that it's harder for the American Alphabet Soup Agencies to infiltrate.......

    2. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wasn't it kaspersky that identified an NSA rootkit a few months back? Yep, they sure are a threat.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    3. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      of course *they're* going to root-out all the nsa ones. it's the RUSSIAN ones they may ignore... the same can be said the other way around, too: an american-based company may be quick to expose (certain) foreign government efforts, but may be compelled by secret order to ignore a u.s. one.

      for that reason, it may be better for us regular folks to trust kaspersky over the likes of symantec or mcafee (or microsoft, even) because our greatest threats exist within our own borders, not outside of them.

    4. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crawl back into your tinfoil lined basement son

    5. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean their outfit turned the table on our spies? Thank you for proving the point.

    6. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it kaspersky that identified an NSA rootkit a few months back? Yep, they sure are a threat.

      That's the point isn't it. Security is all a question of "who's security". If we assume that the NSA are doing even part of their job then it may be against the interest fo the average (USA resident) Slashdotter for Kaspersky to find the malware which will mostly be installed on non-USA computers and often on ones that are attacking the USA.

    7. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course *they're* going to root-out all the nsa ones. it's the RUSSIAN ones they may ignore... the same can be said the other way around, too: an american-based company may be quick to expose (certain) foreign government efforts, but may be compelled by secret order to ignore a u.s. one.

      for that reason, it may be better for us regular folks to trust kaspersky over the likes of symantec or mcafee (or microsoft, even) because our greatest threats exist within our own borders, not outside of them.

      How about using both instead? In some mode where you don't actually have to trust either of them? E.g. read only access on a network-disconnected PC which you subsequently reinstall?

    8. Re: Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were going to reinstall anyway why the hell would you be scanning for viruses?

    9. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      Tinfoil is damned expensive these daysl. You have to order it from scientific or industrial supply houses. All the consumer level stuff is aluminum now.

      The meme needs an update.

    10. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why I DO use Kaspersky ... I live in Australia and so don't want my own government (which is in bed with the US & UK) having access to my personal data.

      But the Russian government? I don't care ... I don't plan to go there any time soon.

    11. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      +1 for using AV products that work and that have the skills to track groups like the Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
      Why risk a US antivirus vendor cooperation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in any US product or OS?
      The PRISM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... list showed what US brands and OS makers would do or "allow" to happen.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, seems they have difficulty picking up the Russian made ones....

  2. What makes you think they aren't already doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    LOL,wait, there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL. Using a respected and renowned cybersecurity first to as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

  3. woo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post

  4. Jeff Sessions is worried about the Ruskies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy is stuck in the 50's

    1. Re:Jeff Sessions is worried about the Ruskies by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      So are the Russians.

  5. Like our Cisco network equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember a news report that touched on Cisco network equipment being altered (chips being replaced) at customs when exported to other countries.

    1. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The joke's on us -- the chips come from China.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke's on us -- the chips come from China.

      Actually the chips come from Taiwan. BIG difference...

    3. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by TWX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chips?

      Most of the Catalyst switches are made in China. The 2960 series, 3560 series, 3600 series, 3750 series, and 3800 series are all made in China. The 4500 series are made in Mexico. You'd be hard-pressed to find a conventional L3 switch not manufactured outside of the United States, and I would be amazed if any L2 switches are made in the US.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China owns Taiwan. China #1!

    5. Re: Like our Cisco network equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan #1. China #4.

    6. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Tailored Access Operations (5/15/2014)
      https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. While we're speculating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listening devices in jars of caviar.

    Seriously, these guys are just thinking up movie plots...

  7. Only buy American products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are secure because the USA has TLAgencies that help protecting the American people.

    1. Re:Only buy American products by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Excellent use of irony.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. This Goes Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We cannot trust the Russians. Russians cannot trust their own government. There is no real liberty or freedom. The Russian government has taken all the power from the citizens.

    Russians cannot trust the United States. The Snowden document dump shows that the USA three letter agencies cannot be trusted by anybody. US citizens cannot trust their own government.

    I tend to think that war is averted when spy agencies effectively keep everything under control. They keep the peace for us. What a wonderful world!

  9. "Officials" not "People with a clue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Officials Fear Russia Could Try To Target United States Through Kaspersky AV

    Everyone Else Fears Russia Could Try To Target United States Through US President.

    1. Re:"Officials" not "People with a clue" by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      "In Soviet Russia, big prop reset button threatens you!"

    2. Re:"Officials" not "People with a clue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well It was the Saudis or the Russians.

  10. "Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by piojo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US? One of the ways Putin maintains power is by rousing hatred against the US. Fortunately (for now), another way he stays in power is by painting himself as a peace-broken. (Remember, he controls the Russian media.) So there is quite a lot of aggressive sentiment toward the US, but that won't necessarily translate into war.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    2. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's bad that NATO leaves a one country buffer zone between Europe and Russia, but not bad that Russia installs military bases right on Europe's doorstep such as Kaliningrad, Moldova, and now parts of Ukraine that it's outright annexed?

      That map is a fine example of telling half the story - Kazakhstan has a NATO base that was used only for onwards staging and transport to Afghanistan purely for anti-Taliban operations for example, yet Russia has a full blown permanent offensive military presence there.

    3. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember, he controls the Russian media.

      And your media is all squeaky clean and above board?
      I would hold Russia Today in higher regard than ANY of the USA propaganda... I mean media outlets, thank your very much.

      That being said I think they are all tools of their respective governments, and they ALL lie!
      The days of honest reporting are long gone.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    4. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US?

      No, I haven't. What I have seen is a good deal of truthful facts and opinion about the US government and its policies. Some of it comes from Russia, some from Europe, some from the UK, Australia and Canada - and quite a lot of it comes from the USA itself.

      Read the following (or as much of it as you can absorb) and see if what you learn is a little different from what the mainstream media are telling their audiences day after day.

      http://russia-insider.com/en/o...
      http://russia-insider.com/en/p...
      http://www.strategic-culture.o...
      http://www.paulcraigroberts.or...
      http://awdnews.com/top-news/ru...
      https://www.rt.com/news/387798...
      http://michael-hudson.com/2017...
      http://russia-insider.com/en/p...
      http://kunstler.com/clusterfuc...
      https://thearchdruidreport.blo...
      https://irrussianality.wordpre...
      http://johnhelmer.net/malaysia...
      https://irrussianality.wordpre...

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 2

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US?

      Could you supply any specific examples? Preferably with URLs.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    6. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1

      So it's bad that NATO leaves a one country buffer zone between Europe and Russia, but not bad that Russia installs military bases right on Europe's doorstep such as Kaliningrad, Moldova, and now parts of Ukraine that it's outright annexed?

      For a start, Russia is a European nation and always has been. So it's not surprising that it has bases in Europe. On the other hand, the USA is NOT a European nation, yet Europe is teeming with American bases, soldiers and weapon systems - including thermonuclear weapons. Russia did "annexe" Crimea, which had been part of Russia since before the USA existed, after the illegal regime in Kiev began determined efforts to exterminate Russian-speaking citizens.

      Kaliningrad - Koenigsberg as was - "became part of the Soviet Union pending the final determination of territorial questions at the peace settlement (as part of the Russian SFSR) as agreed upon by the Allies at the Potsdam Conference". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Kaliningrad is now part of Russia, just as Hawaii and Alaska are part of the USA. Does the USA have military bases in Alaska and Hawaii? According to Time magazine, the USA has about 800 military, naval and air force bases in 70 countries outside the USA. http://time.com/4511744/americ... See also https://www.thenation.com/arti...

      That map is a fine example of telling half the story - Kazakhstan has a NATO base that was used only for onwards staging and transport to Afghanistan purely for anti-Taliban operations for example, yet Russia has a full blown permanent offensive military presence there.

      Kazakhstan used to be part of the USSR, and before that part of the Russian Empire. It has a large Russian-speaking population and is a close ally of Russia. However, it also presents a tempting avenue of attack against Russia's "soft underbelly". Given the presence of Islamist terrorists and NATO in Afghanistan, it's hardly surprising the Russians are on guard and keeping a wary eye open.

      More to the point, what on earth is the USA doing in Afghanistan where it has no business to be, and no legal right? Indeed, the USA has no business to be interfering anywhere in Asia, Europe or Africa.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    7. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1
      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    8. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1
      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  11. All AV Compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would not be surprised if all of them are compromised in some way. What a perfectly legitimate way to hide a snooping/scanning software inside something that already have a legitimate reason to scan all your files and chew up a quarter of your CPU cycles

    1. Re:All AV Compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Snowden leaks* already showed that malware signatures are submitted to AV companies so that they purposefully do not flag the files.
      Frankly, kaspersky, eset, and a handful of others are part of the handful of AVs I trust because they are NOT headquartered in 5 eyes countries.

      The Canadian CSES have a slide with a box clearly labeled with EXACTLY this:
      "
      Commercial/Industry/Relationships
      Influence Technology
      (provide signature to AV)
      "

    2. Re: All AV Compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are stories about the potential for compromising av as the holy grail..perhaps not potentially vs actually anymore but each new feature that runs in admin or assumed safe by the av itself makes it a gold mine if successfully exploited. av vendirs are susceptible to the same business processes that allow for any other application to carry a bug, unpatched for years.

    3. Re:All AV Compromised? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The CIA Vault 7 efforts would show a good AV company is worth supporting. Some of the better AV brands did find and block a few of the CIA efforts given AV staff skills and long term tracking of advanced malware.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Turnabout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be fair turnabout as we're already spying on Russia and China using compromised Cisco equipment.

  13. It's already too late by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    We're all just one automatic upgrade away from infection. ...which now that I think of it, is true for any AV product.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:It's already too late by martinfb · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Duh! Yeah!

      I thought all the AV companies actually also created the need for AV programs!
      Isn't that where most malware comes from?!

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
    2. Re:It's already too late by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Duh! Yeah!

      I thought all the AV companies actually also created the need for AV programs!

      Isn't that where most malware comes from?!

      I'd like to think not, but I guess it's a possibility. Sometimes the constant nagging by my antivirus product to buy more expensive coverage (which is impossible to turn off) feels like malware. Especially when I'm doing work (like editing photos) that takes up the entire screen, and the AV ad pops up over the control sliders. It's enough to make one consider keeping the AV turned off and the network cable unplugged while doing serious work.

      Then there was the hilarious but almost certainly untrue rumor that Microsoft had created an API specifically for malware developers.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. They're really pushing the Russia narrative HARD. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    Russia this, Russia that - seems like the left really fears them for something despite being Soviet themselves.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  15. Does this mean that the US has compromised US AV? by ESarge · · Score: 2

    I remember when much the same concerns were raised about Chinese networking equipment. (If memory serves, being supplied into a large project in Australia).
    This was before the Snowden revelations.

    So, we now know that really what they were doing was preserving the supply of US networking equipment that could be pwned.

    Thus, one wonders if the same thing is happening here?

  16. McCarthy AV by lactose99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you now or have you ever been a member of Kapersky Lab?

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    1. Re:McCarthy AV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either Kapersky labs is trustable or it is not. Is Russia a trusted player or we should assume all 'apps'/ programs of Russian origin are to be considered malware. So which is it?

    2. Re:McCarthy AV by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Either Kapersky labs is trustable or it is not. Is Russia a trusted player or we should assume all 'apps'/ programs of Russian origin are to be considered malware. So which is it?

      If the world is not black and white, care to tell me why you want to treat this problem that way?

      A single company being corrupt within a country isn't exactly some shit we've never heard of.

    3. Re: McCarthy AV by geek · · Score: 2

      Most of Kaspersky labs work out if the U.K. Anyway. But OMGZ DA RUSSIANS

    4. Re:McCarthy AV by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Is Russia a trusted player or we should assume all 'apps'/ programs of Russian origin are to be considered malware.

      If I were a Russian government official, I wouldn't trust any American closed-source software. QED...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re: McCarthy AV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An incredible amount of russian money is banked in London, in fact Putin is comfortable enough to have killed two opponents publicly in that town with little repercussion.

    6. Re: McCarthy AV by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Most of Kaspersky labs work out if the U.K. Anyway.

      And 99% of Apple's business is apparently in Ireland, and manufactures out of China. Anyway.

      But OMGZ DA RUSSIANS

      Yes, perhaps you're right. I mean, why would we ever think the country that was one half of the Cold War for almost half a century would ever be capable of doing such a thing? (again) Sheesh, we're acting like Russian businesses are controlled and manipulated by some kind of communist dictator who uses murder as a form of manipulation. We should lighten up. I'm sure there's nothing to see here...

  17. In Soviet Russia by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 0

    In capitalist America, US President downloads software.

    In soviet Russia, software uploads choose US President.

  18. American companies in Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what about Microsoft, Apple, Google? Should Russia fear all these companies as well and ban them?

    1. Re:American companies in Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear them? Yes. Ban them? Hopefully not.

    2. Re:American companies in Russia? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And what about Microsoft, Apple, Google? Should Russia fear all these companies

      Yeah, probably.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:American companies in Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing about Russia...

      While, say, China has as many MS and Apple customers as you'd expect, given its population and economic development - Russia is just not a major market for either company. Look at the market shares of each platform for any kind of IT - smartphones, tablets, servers, desktop computers - and you'll see Russia is a massive outlier. For all of them.

      The Russians have been going their own way for a long time. And we've been, mostly, ignoring them. With the result that now our script kiddiez know how to hammer any country on earth, except Russia.

    4. Re:American companies in Russia? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Russian secrets are safe on paper in vault, in a building, behind a real wall in a very secure science city.
      No open computer networks with plain text files, no foreigners or illegal migrants getting security related jobs, no new contractors.
      Just real staff working hard all day who are vetted and trusted.
      Russia trust paper files and its own gov/mil. The USA always trusts the new team of contractors.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  19. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LOL,wait, there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL. Using a respected and renowned cybersecurity first to as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

    Also, are there people who think Microsoft isn't compromised? ROFL. Using an operating system with the highest market share as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

  20. The democrats are really out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...with this red scare stuff. Hillary lost because she was an inferior candidate.

    1. Re:The democrats are really out of control by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      It was a choice between a turd sandwich and a giant douche
      I guess the American people wanted a douche instead of a turd.

    2. Re:The democrats are really out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent analogy, I kid you not.
      Moreover, I see now that out of this turd start to grow beautiful roses.
      The first hundred days were amazing! I can already foresee that, in a couple of years, I will get tired of winning :)

    3. Re:The democrats are really out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost because she is a WOMAN.

      US citizens are way too conservative to have a woman as president.

  21. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compromised by the NSA or CIA, more likely.

  22. hard to say by profssrfink · · Score: 1

    We are amidst the beginnings of a new cold war. I have a lot of respect for Kaspersky. Being so close to the Kremlin doesn't made me feel warm and fuzzy, but they have always spoken out against state actors. I wonder if they will respond directly to this as they have always seemed to be a fairly open company with regards to data breaches and cuber security risks. https://www.scmagazineuk.com/i...

    1. Re:hard to say by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of respect for Kaspersky.

      Why, you don't remember the time when AVP was good? Because it was. But now it's the bloatiest of AV. Why would you respect it today?

      Being so close to the Kremlin doesn't made me feel warm and fuzzy, but they have always spoken out against state actors.

      Talk is cheap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:hard to say by profssrfink · · Score: 1

      so your rebuttal to my comment is a superlative and a catch phrase? I respect Kaspersky because they are an open company the talks about threats openly, discusses relevant topics and provides insight most other companies keep close to the vest. I suggest you read their blog. you might feel the same way. Just because I respect them doesn't mean I use their products and it doesn't mean I feel they are completely divorced from the Kremlin. Just means i respect them and that they are probably trying to do the right thing, despite the murky waters they live in. https://securelist.com/

  23. Officials fear *everything* by elcor · · Score: 1

    Just open a dictionary.

  24. Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I haven't used anti-virus software in years. I only have Windows Defender and Malwarebytes installed on my Windows PCs.

    1. Re:Never heard of them... by geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't used anti-virus software in years. I only have Windows Defender and Malwarebytes installed on my Windows PCs.

      Read the first sentence you wrote. Then read the second one. You now have my permission to feel stupid.

    2. Re:Never heard of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used anti-virus software in years. I only have Windows Defender and Malwarebytes installed on my Windows PCs.

      Read the first sentence you wrote. Then read the second one. You now have my permission to feel stupid.

      Proof that a low ID doesn't save you from being an idiot.

    3. Re:Never heard of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

    4. Re:Never heard of them... by geek · · Score: 0

      Moron

    5. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

      Microsoft did something right. I'm impressed.

    6. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Moron

      So my mother tells me. ;)

    7. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Proof that a low ID doesn't save you from being an idiot.

      How many times have Apple demonstrated that "first mover advantage" is a fallacy by showing up late to the party, introducing a new product that's not radically different from earlier products, and raking in buckets of cash?

    8. Re:Never heard of them... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

      Microsoft did something right. I'm impressed.

      Nope.

      Windows Defender is based on GIANT AntiSpyware, which was originally developed by GIANT Company Software, Inc. The company's acquisition was announced by Microsoft on December 16, 2004.

      As usual, if Microsoft appears to have done something right, they bought the software from someone else. It's never developed in-house.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As usual, if Microsoft appears to have done something right, they bought the software from someone else. It's never developed in-house.

      Good point. I just got finish reading "Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley" by Antonio Garcia Martinez, about Facebook advertising. Microsoft bought this company for $6.1B, wrote down $6B in goodwill, and sold the advertising group for $0.1B to Facebook.

    10. Re:Never heard of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, yes - Defender is Crazy Secure. You don't even need a password:
      https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/09/microsoft_windows_defender_security_hole/

  25. This really stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like a bad attempt at getting people to ditch Kaspersky AV and buy the less secure American products. It's too bad most people won't use reason, and just gulp up whatever shit is served to them on the TV..

    And "Russia's growing aggression towards the U.S."? please, that's laughable. There is no other country showing as much aggression as the U.S. both towards its citizens and outwards to other countries.

    Slashdot is really turning into a shitty mouthpiece for American propaganda.

    1. Re: This really stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also infested with putinbots like you who deny the massive Russian cyberwar/black propoganda war against anyone who opposes them.

    2. Re: This really stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also infested with yankbots like you, who see evil Russians everywhere and accuse anyone who has a differing opinion of working directly for Putin. Russia has got nothing on the U.S. when it comes to wars and propaganda, that's fact and history.

  26. It's okay by slapout · · Score: 0

    It's okay. Obama told me the Russians weren't a threat.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:It's okay by murray.wilson · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was Trump

    2. Re:It's okay by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      It's okay. Obama told me the Russians weren't a threat.

      Actually, that was Trump

      Relax. Trump will build a firewall around the US, and make Russia pay for it.

      Or not.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re: It's okay by geek · · Score: 3

      No it was Obama when running against Romney and you all laughed when Romney said they were a threat. Now that Hitlery lost you're all freaking out about Russians. It's fucking hilarious

  27. Re:As an American I have no reason to fear Russia by TWX · · Score: 1

    The two are not mutually exclusive you know.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  28. Re:adoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    [Citation Needed].

  29. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by geek · · Score: 1

    Anything to deflect from their own transgressions, like stealing an election from Bernie Sanders.

  30. Denial-of-Resources attack by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They might make it aggressively scan everything repeatedly so that your PC is slug-city. ...Oh wait, that's McAfee.

  31. Officials Fear USA Could Try To Target Russia Thro by aglider · · Score: 1

    But also Windows!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  32. Re:adoy by Old97 · · Score: 0

    Yes. Next question?

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
  33. Because they would need that.. by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Not saying they aren't (probably are, everyone else is), but let's put it this way: "All those who believe they have an uncrackable product / network / service, take one step forward."

    You'll notice the smarter / older people taking a step back when they hear that.

  34. Isn't this the NSA's job? by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Spying jokes aside, if the NSA (and the greater intelligence community) had pushed for good security practices from the beginning instead of cultivating an environment that made their spying easier, we wouldn't have to worry about this. The US government needs to realize that it cannot have it's cake and eat it too.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    1. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA ... good security practices

      Meanwhile, people are disabling SELinux because it's haaaaard.

    2. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just going to leave this here.
      http://www.aesec.com/

    3. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The have the cake and eat it too. Making us fear Russia more means they get more of our tax money so that they can spy on us better and leak jucy information about our democratically elected officials.

    4. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Along those lines: I'm far more worried about being targeted by our own Government than by the Russians. The U.S. Federal government has shown itself time and again to be, at best, no better than the Russians where our rights and freedoms are concerned:

      1) Continual erosion of the Constitution.
      2) Ignoring the Constitution when following the law becomes inconvenient.
      3) Spying on American citizens.
      4) Systematic molestation by Federal officials at airports.
      5) Lying to the American public as a matter of standard policy (though that is implied in the other four).

      The Russians are WAY down on the list of things we Americans have to worry about at home.

    5. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The NSA wants to be the shield and sword of all things cyber.
      For that to work the world has to accept junk US crypto, low security OS and US brands helping the clandestine services.
      The UK and GCHQ had a much better way. Work with the UK mil and other clandestine services to get things done in secret.
      The NSA needs to tell the public about its role, get funding, tell congress to give more funding, support all its contractors, allow contractors to offer ever more staff and services.
      Then report back on ever more mission successes.
      The US could have fixed all this with good crypto and better staff. No need to have vital US docs in plain text facing the internet. Vetting of internal staff, contractors.
      The effort to blame Russia seems to be more of a PR stunt to try and fix decades of no encryption issues, junk encryption standards and internet facing plain text documents.
      More of a consultant, contractor, gov worker problem. Buying the wrong OS, wrong hardware and keeping it working for too long. Nice overtime and payments but not secure.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  35. How? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Why would any "key U.S system" have Russian AV software installed? A key function of AV software is to be able to intercept pretty much anything that happens.

  36. Re:Denial-of-Resources attack by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I find that quite helpful.
    I put my coffee next to the fan vent on my laptop and it keeps it warm.

  37. Re:Denial-of-Resources attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh - I keep getting exemptions on my corporate computers to not scan my .vmdk files in my vm folder, and then they keep disappearing. I've never seen a bigger waste of resources.

    Normally take at least a 15-minute break when that starts up.

  38. Re:adoy by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    "It's malware we paid for with our taxes! By golly it must be good!"

  39. The bath salts MUST FLOW by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is exactly why I said we needed to draft John McAfee during the 2016 election.
    But NOOOOO... you all said he's too erratic, and temperamentally unsuited to be President.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:The bath salts MUST FLOW by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points today you'd get one. ROTFL!

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:The bath salts MUST FLOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why I said we needed to draft John McAfee during the 2016 election.

      But NOOOOO... you all said he's too erratic, and temperamentally unsuited to be President.

      People actually said that about McAfee but then they go and elect Trump? The irony is overwhelming.

    3. Re:The bath salts MUST FLOW by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Yes Ted, that was the joke...

  40. Obviously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't use any type of software that comes from Russia or China.

  41. Re: Like ALL antiviruses? It's full of security bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone claiming that any non trivial peice of software has *no* bugs is either delusional, a liar or an idiot.

  42. Who is the enemy? by mi · · Score: 2

    So you prefer to use antivirus that lets NSA/CIA/etc viruses and spyware in instead, right?

    Of course! Even if we stipulate, that NSA/CIA routinely access our computers, I'd certainly prefer that, however unpleasant, to a foreign power doing the same. And not just any foreign power, but Russia...

    But, hey, do I understand you right, that you voted for Trump because he was beholden to Russia, rather than for Clinton, who was beholden to NSA/CIA?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Who is the enemy? by mi · · Score: 2

      Name one American the Russians drone murdered.

      I hope, you don't insist on it being done by drones, which Russia does not really have — and what it does have, it uses for intelligence-gathering and artillery-coordination only. But, here, I'll list a few:

      You can also safely chalk up a sizeable fraction of American deaths in the Middle East to Russians — but we may not know the exact details of their coordinating ISIS and other terrorists against the US for decades...

      Now, why is it indicative of anything? Why don't you list the Americans killed by American government — and we'll compare that to the Russians killed by Russia... Ah, you are an American — protected by these people you despise — and not worrying about what Russians do to others? Ok, do you suppose, all an enemy can do is kill? How about spying — on your country? How about lying online with millions of "voices" through hijacked accounts?

      GTMO like prisons

      Darling, GITMO is a tropical paradise compared to the installations run by the enterprise formerly known as GULAG.

      Tell me about the Russian detention without charges + torture program.

      What exactly would you like to know?

      Now explain why would you rather have the CIA on your stuff?

      Because whatever abuse you may accuse CIA of was aimed at the sworn enemies of the US and our allies, not US citizens, however politically active and oppositiony...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Who is the enemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even non-criminal US citizens (queue the five felonies a day website or whatever it is) should be more worried about the US government than the faraway Russian government. If you haven't noticed the US has over 20% of the prisoners on Earth while only having 5% of the world population.
      They're trying to build a prison.
      captcha: bleakly

    3. Re:Who is the enemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even non-criminal US citizens (queue the five felonies a day website or whatever it is) should be more worried about the US government than the faraway Russian government. If you haven't noticed the US has over 20% of the prisoners on Earth while only having 5% of the world population.
      They're trying to build a prison.
      captcha: bleakly

      We have such a high prison population because of that pesky 14th amendment. The USA was founded on slavery and many of the people in power have managed to not only bring back the institution, but make it not only palatable but desirable.

      Black guy speeding--gets pulled over for speeding. Black guy driving below the speed limit--gets pulled over for driving suspiciously. Black guy driving exactly the speed limit--gets pulled over for not going with the flow of traffic. Black guy ends up taking public transport and walking--gets harassed because he's called in for being a suspicious person. Black guy gets some weed to take a load off because he's being harassed by police--gets busted for possession and sentenced 20 years in a private prison because he's a hardened criminal with multiple police run-ins.

  43. Call me all the names you like, but... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: ... FIND a valid one in it. The code's been audited by Malwarebytes' personnel who found it well-written & safe + so do ~60 antivirus programs @ Google's VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

    * 1 of the users of my program said this after monitoring it as it ran in a VM for him: "I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    The code ITSELF is self-checking vs. alterations too (such as viral infestation @ tail end jump tables OR hexeditors) & also protects hosts itself above & beyond WFP/SFP (nothing usermode can bust into it & yes, I've tried).

    APK

    P.S.=> I know a few here (detractors like yourself) have taken a peek @ it & tried to find bugs (not a SINGLE one yet since 2012 public release) - It's not a "super-complex" system & built from PROVEN componentry (of the part I didn't write the Delphi/Object Pascal provides only) in what I call a "hyper-alloy combat chassis" design... apk

    1. Re:Call me all the names you like, but... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Release the source code of your hosts file engine so we can audit it for bugs and possible backdoors you have hidden.

  44. Re:adoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why?

  45. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people who A: rely on evidence, B: know what they're talking about, C: Don't guess and D: Don't say "ROFL" about the situation, you dipshit.

    " there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL "

  46. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by retchdog · · Score: 1

    ah yes, Jeff Sessions, the notorious "leftist".

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  47. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The left" isn't "US officials" you retarded Trumpy illiterates... sorry, Russia may have gotten your babytalking daughter-molesting golfosexual elected but they can't keep him from getting impeached in 6 weeks. Pooooor idiots.

  48. Re:Like ALL antiviruses? It's full of security bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think antivirus software is so bad, then stop bragging about how much Malwarebytes employees love your software. You can't have it both ways.

  49. Re:adoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slide 22:
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1690224/doc-6-cyber-threat-capabilities.pdf

  50. Simple solution by chispito · · Score: 1

    Simple solution: what do Russian opposition parties/organizations use? If they trust Kaspersky, it's probably pretty safe. If I were Russia, I wouldn't bother with it though. Too obvious.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  51. 1980s called by bongey · · Score: 1

    They want their cold war back.

  52. Stealth protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool trick !!!

  53. Aww come on! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't the Democrats have done with it and just re-convene the House Un-American Activities Committee? Given today's political alignment, this could even include restarting the old John Birch Society campaign against dental fluoride. What was old is new again.

    1. Re:Aww come on! by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Why don't the Democrats have done with it and just re-convene the House Un-American Activities Committee?

      Who says they won't? Well ,maybe they won't. The general rule in these things is ' Any Resemblance to Actual Previous Events is Entirely Coincidental. Because We Changed the Names.'

  54. Brag? Just statement of fact is all... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: They host my ware - & IF I'm 'bragging' (which I'm not)? At least I have something to 'brag' about.

    APK

    P.S.=> Face it - you WISH you were me & hate my demographic (doers, not talkers) but the REAL TRUTH of "your kind"? You hate yourselves for being hotair windbag "ne'er-do-wells" & you KNOW it (the rest of us do, so don't fool yourself anymore)... apk

  55. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most all electronics and computers are made in China. Let's boycott them too.

  56. I have nothing to hide from the FSB by williamyf · · Score: 1

    If the NSA, CIA, FBI and Five eyes all can see my Pr0n browsing history, why can't the FSB joint the fun too?

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  57. Re: What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a file I'm sending you right now. Why don't you go and open it right away. It will check out on your virus scanner so you have no evidence of it being malicious. Go on open it ....don't tell me you are not going to open it based on the fact you THINK it might be malicious. You've got no evidence!

    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL
    ROFL......ROFL

  58. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Also, are there people who think Microsoft isn't compromised?

    Probably somewhere, but there have been indications that Microsoft has been working with the NSA for a looooong time. Also, I know it sounds ridiculous, but there is a back door in Intel chips that allows you to access them, even when the OS is not installed. I know that sounds crazy, I thought so too, at first.

    Also, Google secretly hands your emails over to the NSA without telling you.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  59. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    It's better for their image that they were 'hacked' and thus victims, rather than have it be that one of their own turned whistleblower and exposed them to Wikileaks. A lot of clues point that leaker as being Seth Rich, and sadly, he isn't talking.

  60. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

    so true. duh. a decade ago I said to my colleagues, well, most of the antivirus tools are made out of the US with some US sales offices. it's okay. we need to authorize a certain degree of wiretapping by our telecoms to sniff our phones for a scammer script / calls and disconnect the call immediately for us much like we authorize anti-virus tools to block incoming malware. i wonder how long that novel idea will take.

  61. US software by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a stupid move from US, with its world-dominating software industry. Following the same logic, most countries in the world should ban Windows.

  62. Re:adoy by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC recall the Magic Lantern (software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and the efforts to get AV company support for a US gov keylogger.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  63. Re:Denial-of-Resources attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Wally. How's it going?

  64. Re:Like ALL antiviruses? It's full of security bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, that stupid suggestion didn't stop the intel backdoor within AMT / IME of Intel CPU's. You saved face and spammed the thread of that backdoor claiming you blocked that too thru your router. I have downloaded your hosts file engine, but removed it from my system after it is phoning home everywhere. How about you release the source code of your hosts file so I can audit it?

  65. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kaspersky can identify our rootkits. Don't use them because we can't spy on you.

  66. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    After all the news about gov US plain text documents facing the internet and staff walking out to give documents to the waiting media?
    "Russia did it" is about all that can be attempted to cover up for the total lack of domestic crypto and staff vetting over decades.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  67. Re:Thank you by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Yes AC it was AV fun on the CIA Vault 7 detection list. Of the few AV brands that could detect US gov malware and all the trusted AV big brands that totally failed.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  68. No "phone home" from me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing it communicates with is download servers in the hosts file security community & what your favorite sites are to make resolve faster locally proofing you vs. dns security issues too.

    APK

    P.S.=> LOL! You're REALLY 'reaching' UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous stalker - my security setup @ all levels defended me perfectly in that case - it can't "talk back to C&C mama" for orders OR data transit, either way - per Symantec's research of it as to how it worked & what it communicates with (I bust those ports to NULL)... apk

  69. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, of course Kaspersky is controlled by Putin. Seems like an apt choice for a country whose president is controlled by Putin.

  70. Oh, the shelves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the blurb:

    > "Kaspersky Lab's products are stocked on the shelves of Target and Best Buy [...]"

    Oh, yeah. And at night they leave the shelves and go "BRAAAAINS...". But no brains at Target or Best Buy :-(

  71. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by piojo · · Score: 1

    Russia this, Russia that - seems like the left really fears them for something despite being Soviet themselves.

    They are the world's most powerful dictatorship. Putin has been fairly successful in pretending not to be a dictator, but the more of his critics and opponents he kills, the more obvious the charade becomes. If that's not enough cause for concern, Russian-language propaganda against the US is. (Russia's media is controlled by the state.) If that's not a cause for concern, Russia's annexation of other countries (and the world's failure to respond) is.

    --
    A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
  72. Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely some mistake going on here........

    Russia's growing agression to the United States?

    Really, man you should seek employment with the Guardian or any number of Alphabet News outlets.

    I think you will find the agression comes from er.............well the United States. It is a small error and confusing sometimes but please get your facts straight.

  73. McCarthy by Tom · · Score: 2

    McCarthy called, we wants his paranoia back.

    Funny how nobody noticed how very suddenly everything from elections not going the favorite way to bad weather is Putins fault. Let's conveniently ignore that he's been running Russia one way or the other for twenty years.

    Assuming that much of this stuff is either fabricated or wasn't important some years ago and is dragged up now - the question is why? For what purpose is the public fed the old "Russia is evil" meme again? What are we being prepared for?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:McCarthy by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Another war to feed the American industrial military complex, what did you expect?
      Why are you even surprised? America has been at (almost) constant war since the American civil war.

      America is building tanks it doesn't need (or want) just so that they can keep the factory running in case they need to ramp up production
      http://www.military.com/daily-...

      Why would any country do that unless the intention was to go to war in the future.
      We have to defend against Russian aggression I can only see American aggression from where I am standing.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    2. Re:McCarthy by ebvwfbw · · Score: 2

      It's the Democrat's birther joke. The joke's on them. No evidence at all... yet they keep saying there was Russian involvement, etc. Even Dianne Feinstein said recently there is no evidence. So if you see someone saying the russins are coming.. they're a really good mark. They're really gullible.

    3. Re:McCarthy by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      That's not what Eisenhower meant. Re-read his farewell address.

  74. Follow the money and politics behind this warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "warning" is nothing but FUD dressed up as an excuse to force tensions and further a political agenda.

  75. Lights Out management. by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, I know it sounds ridiculous, but there is a back door in Intel chips that allows you to access them, even when the OS is not installed

    Technically:

    1 - it's not in the Intel *CPU*, it's in the Intel *Server Motherboard Chipsets*.
    By design, Intel ME (Management Engine) is a useful tool so sys-admin can remotely access and checks servers (or enterprise workstation) whose OS won't even respond anymore. (e.g.: to diagnose early boot process steps, oversee a firmware update, etc.)
    It' basically a small embed CPU core running a micro embed Linux and featuring a web server for the interface and a sort of VNC server and port forwarder/remote device mapper.
    In practice, this service is done very sloppily and bugs are constantly found that enable exploit and un authorized acces.

    2 - Intel ME has equivalent in other manufacturer called IPMI. e.g.: most of the AMD server motherboard features that one.
    Again, like with Intel ME, cirtical exploitable bug are regularily found in IPMI, meaning it similarly easy to circumvent access control.

    A big chunk of these exploitable bugs in both Intel ME and IPMI are very probably due to sloppy programming for product rushed to the marker.

    But given how many bugs are discovered, and how juicy light-out-management is as a target, there bound to be a few "not so honest mistakes" among these bugs.
    But these not-quite-accidental bugs aren't only to be blamed on US agencies.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  76. Re: Russia's growing aggression toward the US? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Puuuuh-leeeeze!

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  77. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the crimean/ukraine thing happened, I began looking into Kaspersky and decided I wished to go with a different company. Its not so much that I feared this sort of thing though, the amount of resources to run it, and value didn't seem to be there.

  78. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back when Kaspersky first came out, all of the bigname viruses came from Russia. My thought back then was, "why on earth would I give administrator access to an antivirus program written in the same place where all viruses come from?"...

    the mind boggles...

  79. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes... this sudden vile vile hatred of Russia by the evil leftists is almost as strange as the sudden need to defend Russia at every opportunity that the honest rightists display.

    What a brave new world!

  80. MS Defender is easier to subvert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would they bother with subverting Kaspersky? Subverting MS Defender is much easier. You don't even need a password.

  81. No. No Google EFast on my conscience... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: What happened to Google w/ EFast is not going to happen to me & Malwarebytes' hpHosts already audited my code.

    APK

    P.S.=> You don't even code - what would YOU even do w/ it? Of course, you're welcome to PROVE you've done some code of your own now too (of course, I've never seen code w/ the author UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous coward trolling worm either though, lol)... apk

  82. Yet it works well! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Over the past 10 or 15 years, I have tried nearly all of the major (and some not-so-major) AV programs out there.

    The absolute best I have yet used is in fact Kaspersky (Total Security and the Small Office Suite).
    There has never been an instance over the past 3 years of having Kaspersky fail to fully protect all the PCs under my guard (~22 at last count).

    Other AV programs have ALL allowed an infection through at one time or another: AVast, Eset, AVG, McAfee, Norton, TrendMicro, ...

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  83. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The same people accusing Russia of being the culprit are the same ones responsible for his Soviet-like disappearance.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.