Slashdot Mirror


Officials Fear Russia Could Try To Target United States Through Kaspersky AV (go.com)

Russia's growing aggression toward the United States has deepened concerns among U.S. officials that Russian spies might try to exploit one of the world's most respected cybersecurity firms to snoop on Americans or sabotage key U.S. systems, according to an ABC News investigation. From the report: Products from the company, Kaspersky Lab, based in Moscow, are widely used in homes, businesses and government agencies throughout the United States, including the Bureau of Prisons. Kaspersky Lab's products are stocked on the shelves of Target and Best Buy, which also sells laptops loaded by manufacturers with the firm's anti-virus software. But in a secret memorandum sent last month to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Senate Intelligence Committee raised possible red flags about Kaspersky Lab and urged the intelligence community to address potential risks posed by the company's powerful market position. "This [is an] important national security issue," declared the bipartisan memorandum, described to ABC News by congressional sources.

93 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. What makes you think they aren't already doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    LOL,wait, there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL. Using a respected and renowned cybersecurity first to as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

  2. Only buy American products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are secure because the USA has TLAgencies that help protecting the American people.

    1. Re:Only buy American products by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Excellent use of irony.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  3. "Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by piojo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US? One of the ways Putin maintains power is by rousing hatred against the US. Fortunately (for now), another way he stays in power is by painting himself as a peace-broken. (Remember, he controls the Russian media.) So there is quite a lot of aggressive sentiment toward the US, but that won't necessarily translate into war.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    2. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember, he controls the Russian media.

      And your media is all squeaky clean and above board?
      I would hold Russia Today in higher regard than ANY of the USA propaganda... I mean media outlets, thank your very much.

      That being said I think they are all tools of their respective governments, and they ALL lie!
      The days of honest reporting are long gone.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US?

      No, I haven't. What I have seen is a good deal of truthful facts and opinion about the US government and its policies. Some of it comes from Russia, some from Europe, some from the UK, Australia and Canada - and quite a lot of it comes from the USA itself.

      Read the following (or as much of it as you can absorb) and see if what you learn is a little different from what the mainstream media are telling their audiences day after day.

      http://russia-insider.com/en/o...
      http://russia-insider.com/en/p...
      http://www.strategic-culture.o...
      http://www.paulcraigroberts.or...
      http://awdnews.com/top-news/ru...
      https://www.rt.com/news/387798...
      http://michael-hudson.com/2017...
      http://russia-insider.com/en/p...
      http://kunstler.com/clusterfuc...
      https://thearchdruidreport.blo...
      https://irrussianality.wordpre...
      http://johnhelmer.net/malaysia...
      https://irrussianality.wordpre...

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    4. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 2

      That's cute, but have you heard about Russian propaganda about the US?

      Could you supply any specific examples? Preferably with URLs.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1

      So it's bad that NATO leaves a one country buffer zone between Europe and Russia, but not bad that Russia installs military bases right on Europe's doorstep such as Kaliningrad, Moldova, and now parts of Ukraine that it's outright annexed?

      For a start, Russia is a European nation and always has been. So it's not surprising that it has bases in Europe. On the other hand, the USA is NOT a European nation, yet Europe is teeming with American bases, soldiers and weapon systems - including thermonuclear weapons. Russia did "annexe" Crimea, which had been part of Russia since before the USA existed, after the illegal regime in Kiev began determined efforts to exterminate Russian-speaking citizens.

      Kaliningrad - Koenigsberg as was - "became part of the Soviet Union pending the final determination of territorial questions at the peace settlement (as part of the Russian SFSR) as agreed upon by the Allies at the Potsdam Conference". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Kaliningrad is now part of Russia, just as Hawaii and Alaska are part of the USA. Does the USA have military bases in Alaska and Hawaii? According to Time magazine, the USA has about 800 military, naval and air force bases in 70 countries outside the USA. http://time.com/4511744/americ... See also https://www.thenation.com/arti...

      That map is a fine example of telling half the story - Kazakhstan has a NATO base that was used only for onwards staging and transport to Afghanistan purely for anti-Taliban operations for example, yet Russia has a full blown permanent offensive military presence there.

      Kazakhstan used to be part of the USSR, and before that part of the Russian Empire. It has a large Russian-speaking population and is a close ally of Russia. However, it also presents a tempting avenue of attack against Russia's "soft underbelly". Given the presence of Islamist terrorists and NATO in Afghanistan, it's hardly surprising the Russians are on guard and keeping a wary eye open.

      More to the point, what on earth is the USA doing in Afghanistan where it has no business to be, and no legal right? Indeed, the USA has no business to be interfering anywhere in Asia, Europe or Africa.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    6. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1
      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    7. Re:"Russia's growing aggression toward the USA..." by Archtech · · Score: 1
      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  4. It's already too late by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    We're all just one automatic upgrade away from infection. ...which now that I think of it, is true for any AV product.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:It's already too late by martinfb · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Duh! Yeah!

      I thought all the AV companies actually also created the need for AV programs!
      Isn't that where most malware comes from?!

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
    2. Re:It's already too late by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Duh! Yeah!

      I thought all the AV companies actually also created the need for AV programs!

      Isn't that where most malware comes from?!

      I'd like to think not, but I guess it's a possibility. Sometimes the constant nagging by my antivirus product to buy more expensive coverage (which is impossible to turn off) feels like malware. Especially when I'm doing work (like editing photos) that takes up the entire screen, and the AV ad pops up over the control sliders. It's enough to make one consider keeping the AV turned off and the network cable unplugged while doing serious work.

      Then there was the hilarious but almost certainly untrue rumor that Microsoft had created an API specifically for malware developers.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  5. They're really pushing the Russia narrative HARD. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    Russia this, Russia that - seems like the left really fears them for something despite being Soviet themselves.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  6. Does this mean that the US has compromised US AV? by ESarge · · Score: 2

    I remember when much the same concerns were raised about Chinese networking equipment. (If memory serves, being supplied into a large project in Australia).
    This was before the Snowden revelations.

    So, we now know that really what they were doing was preserving the supply of US networking equipment that could be pwned.

    Thus, one wonders if the same thing is happening here?

  7. McCarthy AV by lactose99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you now or have you ever been a member of Kapersky Lab?

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    1. Re:McCarthy AV by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Either Kapersky labs is trustable or it is not. Is Russia a trusted player or we should assume all 'apps'/ programs of Russian origin are to be considered malware. So which is it?

      If the world is not black and white, care to tell me why you want to treat this problem that way?

      A single company being corrupt within a country isn't exactly some shit we've never heard of.

    2. Re: McCarthy AV by geek · · Score: 2

      Most of Kaspersky labs work out if the U.K. Anyway. But OMGZ DA RUSSIANS

    3. Re:McCarthy AV by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Is Russia a trusted player or we should assume all 'apps'/ programs of Russian origin are to be considered malware.

      If I were a Russian government official, I wouldn't trust any American closed-source software. QED...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re: McCarthy AV by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Most of Kaspersky labs work out if the U.K. Anyway.

      And 99% of Apple's business is apparently in Ireland, and manufactures out of China. Anyway.

      But OMGZ DA RUSSIANS

      Yes, perhaps you're right. I mean, why would we ever think the country that was one half of the Cold War for almost half a century would ever be capable of doing such a thing? (again) Sheesh, we're acting like Russian businesses are controlled and manipulated by some kind of communist dictator who uses murder as a form of manipulation. We should lighten up. I'm sure there's nothing to see here...

  8. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    The joke's on us -- the chips come from China.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. American companies in Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what about Microsoft, Apple, Google? Should Russia fear all these companies as well and ban them?

    1. Re:American companies in Russia? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And what about Microsoft, Apple, Google? Should Russia fear all these companies

      Yeah, probably.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:American companies in Russia? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Russian secrets are safe on paper in vault, in a building, behind a real wall in a very secure science city.
      No open computer networks with plain text files, no foreigners or illegal migrants getting security related jobs, no new contractors.
      Just real staff working hard all day who are vetted and trusted.
      Russia trust paper files and its own gov/mil. The USA always trusts the new team of contractors.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LOL,wait, there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL. Using a respected and renowned cybersecurity first to as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

    Also, are there people who think Microsoft isn't compromised? ROFL. Using an operating system with the highest market share as a cover seems like a no-brainer to me. I've assumed they were compromised years ago, quite frankly.

  11. The democrats are really out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...with this red scare stuff. Hillary lost because she was an inferior candidate.

  12. hard to say by profssrfink · · Score: 1

    We are amidst the beginnings of a new cold war. I have a lot of respect for Kaspersky. Being so close to the Kremlin doesn't made me feel warm and fuzzy, but they have always spoken out against state actors. I wonder if they will respond directly to this as they have always seemed to be a fairly open company with regards to data breaches and cuber security risks. https://www.scmagazineuk.com/i...

    1. Re:hard to say by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of respect for Kaspersky.

      Why, you don't remember the time when AVP was good? Because it was. But now it's the bloatiest of AV. Why would you respect it today?

      Being so close to the Kremlin doesn't made me feel warm and fuzzy, but they have always spoken out against state actors.

      Talk is cheap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:hard to say by profssrfink · · Score: 1

      so your rebuttal to my comment is a superlative and a catch phrase? I respect Kaspersky because they are an open company the talks about threats openly, discusses relevant topics and provides insight most other companies keep close to the vest. I suggest you read their blog. you might feel the same way. Just because I respect them doesn't mean I use their products and it doesn't mean I feel they are completely divorced from the Kremlin. Just means i respect them and that they are probably trying to do the right thing, despite the murky waters they live in. https://securelist.com/

  13. Officials fear *everything* by elcor · · Score: 1

    Just open a dictionary.

  14. Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I haven't used anti-virus software in years. I only have Windows Defender and Malwarebytes installed on my Windows PCs.

    1. Re:Never heard of them... by geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't used anti-virus software in years. I only have Windows Defender and Malwarebytes installed on my Windows PCs.

      Read the first sentence you wrote. Then read the second one. You now have my permission to feel stupid.

    2. Re:Never heard of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

    3. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

      Microsoft did something right. I'm impressed.

    4. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Moron

      So my mother tells me. ;)

    5. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Proof that a low ID doesn't save you from being an idiot.

      How many times have Apple demonstrated that "first mover advantage" is a fallacy by showing up late to the party, introducing a new product that's not radically different from earlier products, and raking in buckets of cash?

    6. Re:Never heard of them... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows Defender is the No. 1 antivirus on Windows 10, protecting more computers against viruses, malware, spyware, and other threats than any other solution.

      Microsoft did something right. I'm impressed.

      Nope.

      Windows Defender is based on GIANT AntiSpyware, which was originally developed by GIANT Company Software, Inc. The company's acquisition was announced by Microsoft on December 16, 2004.

      As usual, if Microsoft appears to have done something right, they bought the software from someone else. It's never developed in-house.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Never heard of them... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As usual, if Microsoft appears to have done something right, they bought the software from someone else. It's never developed in-house.

      Good point. I just got finish reading "Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley" by Antonio Garcia Martinez, about Facebook advertising. Microsoft bought this company for $6.1B, wrote down $6B in goodwill, and sold the advertising group for $0.1B to Facebook.

  15. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by TWX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chips?

    Most of the Catalyst switches are made in China. The 2960 series, 3560 series, 3600 series, 3750 series, and 3800 series are all made in China. The 4500 series are made in Mexico. You'd be hard-pressed to find a conventional L3 switch not manufactured outside of the United States, and I would be amazed if any L2 switches are made in the US.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  16. Re:As an American I have no reason to fear Russia by TWX · · Score: 1

    The two are not mutually exclusive you know.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  17. Re:adoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    [Citation Needed].

  18. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wasn't it kaspersky that identified an NSA rootkit a few months back? Yep, they sure are a threat.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  19. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by geek · · Score: 1

    Anything to deflect from their own transgressions, like stealing an election from Bernie Sanders.

  20. Denial-of-Resources attack by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They might make it aggressively scan everything repeatedly so that your PC is slug-city. ...Oh wait, that's McAfee.

  21. Officials Fear USA Could Try To Target Russia Thro by aglider · · Score: 1

    But also Windows!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  22. Because they would need that.. by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Not saying they aren't (probably are, everyone else is), but let's put it this way: "All those who believe they have an uncrackable product / network / service, take one step forward."

    You'll notice the smarter / older people taking a step back when they hear that.

  23. Isn't this the NSA's job? by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Spying jokes aside, if the NSA (and the greater intelligence community) had pushed for good security practices from the beginning instead of cultivating an environment that made their spying easier, we wouldn't have to worry about this. The US government needs to realize that it cannot have it's cake and eat it too.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    1. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Along those lines: I'm far more worried about being targeted by our own Government than by the Russians. The U.S. Federal government has shown itself time and again to be, at best, no better than the Russians where our rights and freedoms are concerned:

      1) Continual erosion of the Constitution.
      2) Ignoring the Constitution when following the law becomes inconvenient.
      3) Spying on American citizens.
      4) Systematic molestation by Federal officials at airports.
      5) Lying to the American public as a matter of standard policy (though that is implied in the other four).

      The Russians are WAY down on the list of things we Americans have to worry about at home.

    2. Re:Isn't this the NSA's job? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The NSA wants to be the shield and sword of all things cyber.
      For that to work the world has to accept junk US crypto, low security OS and US brands helping the clandestine services.
      The UK and GCHQ had a much better way. Work with the UK mil and other clandestine services to get things done in secret.
      The NSA needs to tell the public about its role, get funding, tell congress to give more funding, support all its contractors, allow contractors to offer ever more staff and services.
      Then report back on ever more mission successes.
      The US could have fixed all this with good crypto and better staff. No need to have vital US docs in plain text facing the internet. Vetting of internal staff, contractors.
      The effort to blame Russia seems to be more of a PR stunt to try and fix decades of no encryption issues, junk encryption standards and internet facing plain text documents.
      More of a consultant, contractor, gov worker problem. Buying the wrong OS, wrong hardware and keeping it working for too long. Nice overtime and payments but not secure.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  24. How? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Why would any "key U.S system" have Russian AV software installed? A key function of AV software is to be able to intercept pretty much anything that happens.

  25. Re:Denial-of-Resources attack by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I find that quite helpful.
    I put my coffee next to the fan vent on my laptop and it keeps it warm.

  26. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    of course *they're* going to root-out all the nsa ones. it's the RUSSIAN ones they may ignore... the same can be said the other way around, too: an american-based company may be quick to expose (certain) foreign government efforts, but may be compelled by secret order to ignore a u.s. one.

    for that reason, it may be better for us regular folks to trust kaspersky over the likes of symantec or mcafee (or microsoft, even) because our greatest threats exist within our own borders, not outside of them.

  27. Re:All AV Compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Snowden leaks* already showed that malware signatures are submitted to AV companies so that they purposefully do not flag the files.
    Frankly, kaspersky, eset, and a handful of others are part of the handful of AVs I trust because they are NOT headquartered in 5 eyes countries.

    The Canadian CSES have a slide with a box clearly labeled with EXACTLY this:
    "
    Commercial/Industry/Relationships
    Influence Technology
    (provide signature to AV)
    "

  28. Re:adoy by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    "It's malware we paid for with our taxes! By golly it must be good!"

  29. Re:It's okay by murray.wilson · · Score: 1

    Actually, that was Trump

  30. The bath salts MUST FLOW by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is exactly why I said we needed to draft John McAfee during the 2016 election.
    But NOOOOO... you all said he's too erratic, and temperamentally unsuited to be President.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:The bath salts MUST FLOW by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points today you'd get one. ROTFL!

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:The bath salts MUST FLOW by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Yes Ted, that was the joke...

  31. Re:"Officials" not "People with a clue" by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    "In Soviet Russia, big prop reset button threatens you!"

  32. Re:It's okay by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    It's okay. Obama told me the Russians weren't a threat.

    Actually, that was Trump

    Relax. Trump will build a firewall around the US, and make Russia pay for it.

    Or not.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  33. Who is the enemy? by mi · · Score: 2

    So you prefer to use antivirus that lets NSA/CIA/etc viruses and spyware in instead, right?

    Of course! Even if we stipulate, that NSA/CIA routinely access our computers, I'd certainly prefer that, however unpleasant, to a foreign power doing the same. And not just any foreign power, but Russia...

    But, hey, do I understand you right, that you voted for Trump because he was beholden to Russia, rather than for Clinton, who was beholden to NSA/CIA?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Who is the enemy? by mi · · Score: 2

      Name one American the Russians drone murdered.

      I hope, you don't insist on it being done by drones, which Russia does not really have — and what it does have, it uses for intelligence-gathering and artillery-coordination only. But, here, I'll list a few:

      You can also safely chalk up a sizeable fraction of American deaths in the Middle East to Russians — but we may not know the exact details of their coordinating ISIS and other terrorists against the US for decades...

      Now, why is it indicative of anything? Why don't you list the Americans killed by American government — and we'll compare that to the Russians killed by Russia... Ah, you are an American — protected by these people you despise — and not worrying about what Russians do to others? Ok, do you suppose, all an enemy can do is kill? How about spying — on your country? How about lying online with millions of "voices" through hijacked accounts?

      GTMO like prisons

      Darling, GITMO is a tropical paradise compared to the installations run by the enterprise formerly known as GULAG.

      Tell me about the Russian detention without charges + torture program.

      What exactly would you like to know?

      Now explain why would you rather have the CIA on your stuff?

      Because whatever abuse you may accuse CIA of was aimed at the sworn enemies of the US and our allies, not US citizens, however politically active and oppositiony...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  34. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people who A: rely on evidence, B: know what they're talking about, C: Don't guess and D: Don't say "ROFL" about the situation, you dipshit.

    " there are people who think Kasperesky isn't compromised? ROFL "

  35. Re: It's okay by geek · · Score: 3

    No it was Obama when running against Romney and you all laughed when Romney said they were a threat. Now that Hitlery lost you're all freaking out about Russians. It's fucking hilarious

  36. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by retchdog · · Score: 1

    ah yes, Jeff Sessions, the notorious "leftist".

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  37. Simple solution by chispito · · Score: 1

    Simple solution: what do Russian opposition parties/organizations use? If they trust Kaspersky, it's probably pretty safe. If I were Russia, I wouldn't bother with it though. Too obvious.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  38. 1980s called by bongey · · Score: 1

    They want their cold war back.

  39. Aww come on! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't the Democrats have done with it and just re-convene the House Un-American Activities Committee? Given today's political alignment, this could even include restarting the old John Birch Society campaign against dental fluoride. What was old is new again.

    1. Re:Aww come on! by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Why don't the Democrats have done with it and just re-convene the House Un-American Activities Committee?

      Who says they won't? Well ,maybe they won't. The general rule in these things is ' Any Resemblance to Actual Previous Events is Entirely Coincidental. Because We Changed the Names.'

  40. I have nothing to hide from the FSB by williamyf · · Score: 1

    If the NSA, CIA, FBI and Five eyes all can see my Pr0n browsing history, why can't the FSB joint the fun too?

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  41. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Also, are there people who think Microsoft isn't compromised?

    Probably somewhere, but there have been indications that Microsoft has been working with the NSA for a looooong time. Also, I know it sounds ridiculous, but there is a back door in Intel chips that allows you to access them, even when the OS is not installed. I know that sounds crazy, I thought so too, at first.

    Also, Google secretly hands your emails over to the NSA without telling you.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  42. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    It's better for their image that they were 'hacked' and thus victims, rather than have it be that one of their own turned whistleblower and exposed them to Wikileaks. A lot of clues point that leaker as being Seth Rich, and sadly, he isn't talking.

  43. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

    Tinfoil is damned expensive these daysl. You have to order it from scientific or industrial supply houses. All the consumer level stuff is aluminum now.

    The meme needs an update.

  44. Re:What makes you think they aren't already doing by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

    so true. duh. a decade ago I said to my colleagues, well, most of the antivirus tools are made out of the US with some US sales offices. it's okay. we need to authorize a certain degree of wiretapping by our telecoms to sniff our phones for a scammer script / calls and disconnect the call immediately for us much like we authorize anti-virus tools to block incoming malware. i wonder how long that novel idea will take.

  45. US software by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a stupid move from US, with its world-dominating software industry. Following the same logic, most countries in the world should ban Windows.

  46. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why I DO use Kaspersky ... I live in Australia and so don't want my own government (which is in bed with the US & UK) having access to my personal data.

    But the Russian government? I don't care ... I don't plan to go there any time soon.

  47. Re:adoy by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC recall the Magic Lantern (software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and the efforts to get AV company support for a US gov keylogger.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  48. Re:Kapersky? Most respected cybersecurity firms? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    +1 for using AV products that work and that have the skills to track groups like the Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
    Why risk a US antivirus vendor cooperation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in any US product or OS?
    The PRISM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... list showed what US brands and OS makers would do or "allow" to happen.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  49. Re:Like our Cisco network equipment by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Tailored Access Operations (5/15/2014)
    https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  50. Re:All AV Compromised? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The CIA Vault 7 efforts would show a good AV company is worth supporting. Some of the better AV brands did find and block a few of the CIA efforts given AV staff skills and long term tracking of advanced malware.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  51. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    After all the news about gov US plain text documents facing the internet and staff walking out to give documents to the waiting media?
    "Russia did it" is about all that can be attempted to cover up for the total lack of domestic crypto and staff vetting over decades.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  52. Re:Thank you by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Yes AC it was AV fun on the CIA Vault 7 detection list. Of the few AV brands that could detect US gov malware and all the trusted AV big brands that totally failed.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  53. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by piojo · · Score: 1

    Russia this, Russia that - seems like the left really fears them for something despite being Soviet themselves.

    They are the world's most powerful dictatorship. Putin has been fairly successful in pretending not to be a dictator, but the more of his critics and opponents he kills, the more obvious the charade becomes. If that's not enough cause for concern, Russian-language propaganda against the US is. (Russia's media is controlled by the state.) If that's not a cause for concern, Russia's annexation of other countries (and the world's failure to respond) is.

    --
    A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
  54. McCarthy by Tom · · Score: 2

    McCarthy called, we wants his paranoia back.

    Funny how nobody noticed how very suddenly everything from elections not going the favorite way to bad weather is Putins fault. Let's conveniently ignore that he's been running Russia one way or the other for twenty years.

    Assuming that much of this stuff is either fabricated or wasn't important some years ago and is dragged up now - the question is why? For what purpose is the public fed the old "Russia is evil" meme again? What are we being prepared for?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:McCarthy by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Another war to feed the American industrial military complex, what did you expect?
      Why are you even surprised? America has been at (almost) constant war since the American civil war.

      America is building tanks it doesn't need (or want) just so that they can keep the factory running in case they need to ramp up production
      http://www.military.com/daily-...

      Why would any country do that unless the intention was to go to war in the future.
      We have to defend against Russian aggression I can only see American aggression from where I am standing.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    2. Re:McCarthy by ebvwfbw · · Score: 2

      It's the Democrat's birther joke. The joke's on them. No evidence at all... yet they keep saying there was Russian involvement, etc. Even Dianne Feinstein said recently there is no evidence. So if you see someone saying the russins are coming.. they're a really good mark. They're really gullible.

    3. Re:McCarthy by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      That's not what Eisenhower meant. Re-read his farewell address.

  55. Lights Out management. by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, I know it sounds ridiculous, but there is a back door in Intel chips that allows you to access them, even when the OS is not installed

    Technically:

    1 - it's not in the Intel *CPU*, it's in the Intel *Server Motherboard Chipsets*.
    By design, Intel ME (Management Engine) is a useful tool so sys-admin can remotely access and checks servers (or enterprise workstation) whose OS won't even respond anymore. (e.g.: to diagnose early boot process steps, oversee a firmware update, etc.)
    It' basically a small embed CPU core running a micro embed Linux and featuring a web server for the interface and a sort of VNC server and port forwarder/remote device mapper.
    In practice, this service is done very sloppily and bugs are constantly found that enable exploit and un authorized acces.

    2 - Intel ME has equivalent in other manufacturer called IPMI. e.g.: most of the AMD server motherboard features that one.
    Again, like with Intel ME, cirtical exploitable bug are regularily found in IPMI, meaning it similarly easy to circumvent access control.

    A big chunk of these exploitable bugs in both Intel ME and IPMI are very probably due to sloppy programming for product rushed to the marker.

    But given how many bugs are discovered, and how juicy light-out-management is as a target, there bound to be a few "not so honest mistakes" among these bugs.
    But these not-quite-accidental bugs aren't only to be blamed on US agencies.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  56. Re: Russia's growing aggression toward the US? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Puuuuh-leeeeze!

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  57. Re:Jeff Sessions is worried about the Ruskies by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    So are the Russians.

  58. Yet it works well! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Over the past 10 or 15 years, I have tried nearly all of the major (and some not-so-major) AV programs out there.

    The absolute best I have yet used is in fact Kaspersky (Total Security and the Small Office Suite).
    There has never been an instance over the past 3 years of having Kaspersky fail to fully protect all the PCs under my guard (~22 at last count).

    Other AV programs have ALL allowed an infection through at one time or another: AVast, Eset, AVG, McAfee, Norton, TrendMicro, ...

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  59. Re:They're really pushing the Russia narrative HAR by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The same people accusing Russia of being the culprit are the same ones responsible for his Soviet-like disappearance.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.