Slashdot Mirror


Did The UK Police Hire Foreigners To Hack Hundreds of Activists? (bbc.co.uk)

Big Hairy Ian shared this story from the BBC: Undercover counter-extremism officers used hackers in India to access the emails of journalists and environmental activists, it has been claimed... The Independent Police Complaints Commission said it had received an anonymous letter, which alleged covert officers from the Metropolitan Police's National Domestic Extremism and Disorder Intelligence Unit contacted Indian police officers for help to enlist hackers. The letter alleges the hackers accessed the email accounts of hundreds of people, including members of political and environmental pressure groups and journalists.
"The letter said the monitoring included the 'email accounts of radical journalists who reported on activist protests (as well as sympathetic photographers) including at least two employed by the Guardian newspaper,'" the Guardian reports, adding that the letter provided the names of 10 campaigners -- and the passwords for their accounts.

72 comments

  1. Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh my, there has to be an Indian Outsourcing joke here someplace. But seriously, without the letter to the Guardian, if this was discovered "Metropolitan Police's National Domestic Extremism and Disorder Intelligence Unit" would probably put forth some "plausible deniability" story - "It wasn't us! Must have been those pesky Russians again..."

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let's pretend the pesky Russians don't hack at all, it's just a meme for fake news..."

    2. Re: Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by dougdonovan · · Score: 2

      i doubt any law enforcement agency globally has the intelligence to know how to hire a legit hacker.

    3. Re: Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt any law enforcement agency globally has the intelligence to know how to hire a legit hacker.

      Just put it up on mechanical turk...

    4. Re: Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're hiring a legit hacker, try Russia or China. The fact that they went to India demonstrates their incompetence. I wonder how many outsourcing houses they went through before they found one that agreed to do it?

    5. Re:Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can imagine my surprise to find that this massive abuse of privacy, sidestepping of judicial hurdles and outright fuckery was courtesy of the Metropolitan Police, the most institutionally corrupt police force in the UK. You could halve actual crime in London by locking the entire force in its own cells.

    6. Re:Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mebby bitch-Gaias ISIS, the warmist pressure-pimpers need to have iron-bootheels installed in their smashed jaws. Kicked to the gutter encourage dogs chew their bones.

  2. What??? by Nutria · · Score: 1

    I thought "5 Eyes"/UKUSA meant that the Brits would just politely ask the NSA, who -- naturally -- know everything about everybody.

    Maybe privacy activists (the same ones who were sure that they'd get thrown in Gitmo) are full of crap.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:What??? by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The NSA can only be used by the American government for political spying, the British conservatives can not use the NSA or 5 eyes collectively for politically based spying. Basically this is just conservative politics law enforcers using their power for political purposes. The real warning, how far will they go to target the most effective political campaigners, a murderous arrest, they had to be safe, targeted law enforcements attacks against the whole family of the targeted political campaigner, fabrication of false evidence (reinforcement chairs become caltrops, empty bottles and a can of lawn mower fuel become a molotov cocktail fabrication facility, water recycling becomes biological weapons production), repeatedly violently targeting the specific individuals at protests, ensuring the unemployability for security reasons including their entire family.

      It is crap to defend criminal politically based behaviour by law enforcers because that does lead to assassination by law enforcers during false arrests, that is exactly where politically based law enforcement spying leads. A sure sign of an extremely corrupt government.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:What??? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The NSA can only be used by the American government for political spying

      Seriously? Sure... By the way, when would you like to get together to close the deal on the bridge? The papers are ready for your signature.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  3. the UK police might have hired them by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    by accident. bob's your uncle and all that.

  4. It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Informative

    This sort of "outsourcing" of illegal information gathering activities has been going on for years. GCHQ has the NSA spying on the Brits. GCHQ spies on the Yankees. The Cannucks are spying on the Aussies and the Aussies are spying on the Cannucks. Meanwhile the Kiwis are all pissed because no one gives a shit about what goes on in New Zealand.

    For a country like America who gave the crown a fat middle finger, the level of coziness today should unnerve everyone.

    1. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You didn't give the crown a middle finger though. The French gave the British Crown the middle finger and the colonists were merely along for the ride. Most of them (2/3rds by all accounts) either supported the crown or didn't care who won.
      You don't even know your own history.

    2. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by reanjr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe you should do a bit of history learning. Or perhaps learn something about analogies. It's pretty clear the US gave the British crown the finger while France was standing behind America, flexing its muscles, ready to throw down.

    3. Re:It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Within the UK it gets even more interesting.
      When the UK was collecting on all calls within Ireland and between Ireland and the rest of the world the UK needed to keep such collection secret from the press, lawyers, any court setting, human rights groups, UK police who enjoyed talking with the media, UK police with contacts in Ireland.
      So only the UK mil, GCHQ and Royal Ulster Constabulary Special Branch would often see the results of collection. No other parts of the UK gov could be trusted with raw product and the results of collect it all.
      Irish funding and support had to also be tracked in the USA by the UK, and had to avoid all questions by the USA.
      Later meetings saw the use of Forward Intelligence Team https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Other issues show the need to control unions in the UK "Police ‘covered up’ links with union blacklisting" (8 Nov 2014)
      https://www.theguardian.com/uk...
      The use of different groups by the sections of the UK police and UK gov offers a way of ensuring police officials, the media, lawyers never pay for or get told of such methods.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't talk shit. The UK jettisoned the US - the "war" was nothing of the sort and allowed the UK to rid itself of a constantly whining, unproductive colony and to get rid of some inconvenient poor people from its own side. Who knows what would have happened if the UK had actually bothered to robustly defend its interests there?

    5. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It depends on exactly which sources you trust. There's reasonable evidence that more than 1/3 supported the US revolution, at least passively, and about 1/3 supported staying with Britain. The exact proportions depend on how you figure support and which colonies you are looking at. Also when. The US revolutionaries were clearly losing until the French supported the revolution. If your viewpoint is from Europe, then that was the French giving Britain the finger, but if your viewpoint is from the US they were only a supporting actor. Both views are valid. And if you asked people after the war was over, most people supported the revolutionaries...except when the economy was really in the dumps.

      Few people were either committed revolutionaries or committed loyalists. The committed revolutionaries were generally much more committed than were the crown loyalists.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. False false false. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am 100% british (I love spotted dick!) and can say with confidence total that this story is the false news.

    1. Re:False false false. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hello mrs may

    2. Re: False false false. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For our cousins in the US, it should be pointed out that the overwhelming majority of people in the UK have never seen let alone tried spotted dick, although many might recognise the name.

  6. Not according to the UK BBC news site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story isn't on the BBC UK site yet. Interesting, I wonder if it ever will be?

    1. Re: Not according to the UK BBC news site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-39885655

      48 hours ago...

  7. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did not. This is false news planted by transexuals.

  8. I hope this isn't true. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    When a government ignores its own laws, the law loses its authority. When the law loses its authority, lawlessness begins to emerge.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re: I hope this isn't true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, I think the current UK government reducing their police force by 20,000 since they came to power has had more of an impact on lawlessness.

    2. Re:I hope this isn't true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spying, great british hobby second only to gardening

    3. Re:I hope this isn't true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UKstan is long past that.

    4. Re: I hope this isn't true. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      To be honest, a reduction in crime of 30% probably justifies a reduction in the police force of 10%.

      A switch to buying (UK made) Nissans instead (imported) BMWs might safe a bit of dosh too.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re: I hope this isn't true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might, a shame that all crime, especially violent crime is rising rapidly. Thanks for the fake news, though.

  9. Can't be in light of a recent story by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Given that only 36 percent of Indian coders can write compilable code, what makes anyone think they can hack e-mail? For that matter, they haven't been able to become convincing telephone scammers either. I call B.S.

    1. Re: Can't be in light of a recent story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? All of my mail systems deny passwords input with an Indian accent.

    2. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, you simply use 178% more of them! The price is still decent even at that point.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indians were probably handed all the information they needed to just log into the accounts

    4. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must have had a better hiring manager then- someone who can actually distinguish the hole where the shit comes out from the one where the food goes in.

    5. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

      Can't make a baby in one month by impregnating nine women.

    6. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      That's why we have operational research for inventory optimization! No need for these ridiculous lead times if you're a responsible hospital manager.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  10. They're following the lead by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, basically, the UK is following the lead of the USS... I mean the USA... in having an agency illegally monitor internal political dissenters?

    1. Re:They're following the lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, basically, the UK is following the lead of the USS... I mean the USA... in having an agency illegally monitor internal political dissenters?"

      I would say that has been happening long before the US existed or even the kingdoms were united.

    2. Re:They're following the lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot, they trial everything in Britain first.

  11. Betteridge's Law by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Did The UK Police Hire Foreigners To Hack Hundreds of Activists?"

    Answer: Probably.

    (Yes, yes, I know Betteridge's Law says the answer is "No", but I'm allowing a little leeway this time. Deal with it.)

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re: Betteridge's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The BBC. "Leftist media". Let me guess, you were going to vote Trump but found the ballot paper too complicated.

    2. Re: Betteridge's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The BBC is obstensively neutral, yet as a body originally set up by the UK government to control the narrative, will bend to "the national interest", which is to say the goverment of the day. You should expect certain key stories buried or framed "to remove bias" (ie introduce bias). As the current government is ludicrously right wing, the current bias is "neutral with stories prejudical to the right squelched"

    3. Re: Betteridge's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those wondering, the UK government is at war with its police force. Many police forces have filed lawsuits against the government, and funding continues to decline.

  12. they still issue d notices to media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that means, this info was approved to be published by bbc.

    1. Re: they still issue d notices to media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so cosy or so straightforward now.

      "editors have also got away with bypassing the D-notice system altogether by refusing to alert the committee to stories they feared might lead to injunctions."

  13. "Holy shit!" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    ..."Jesus fuck!" and "Motherfucker!" are among things I said out loud while reading the summary. Why can't intelligence and law enforcement resist becoming the Stasi? Why do they always target innocent protesters for illegal surveillance?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:"Holy shit!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your questions are rhetorical :), but here goes:

      All the 'intelligence' service are like the Stasi, the Stasi mode happens when they want to punish and control more, at the expense of the economy,

      Why are protestors and journalists targetted? All governments are corrupt because they lay false claim of ownership to the land, and then demand and steal monies (taxation). So, governments are always afraid of a revolution, because there is always something to revolt over. Protestors and journalists often begin the idea of a revolution by pointing out the corruption of government.

      Most people in the UK know it is a tyrannical monarchy, that uses an oligarchy of very limited democracy to help balance the maximum return from the subjects. i.e. we are being farmed.

      We probably do need to develop more democratic models to live life by. Equal land ownership seems like a no brainer as the place to start, and taxation can then just be based on how much land you are occupying over the equal amount. Whilst 99% would be better of, at least the 1% wouldn't be looking over their shoulders all the time, so could be argued they would have a better life. Wars wouldn't happen, theft would disappear, murders less likely, huge reduction in rape and assault, pollution reduction etc.

    2. Re:"Holy shit!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protestors are only targeted when they hinder the establishment's agenda. Ones that further their agenda get police protection and a media that vilifies whatever the protestor's target is.

    3. Re: "Holy shit!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the UK, most mass media is controlled by a small handful of oligarchs (like Murdoch) who are sympathetic to maintaining a tory/right wing government. Finding opposing views is increasingly difficult. Meanwhile, in the US the similarly right wing press who are critical of the extreme right like Trump have been rebranded "left wing", " lying press" and similar fascist epithets. I fear the US will be headed the way of the UK, where all mainstream media are expected to be those that parrot the views of the government and attack their political enemies. Such a system is the death of democracy.

    4. Re:"Holy shit!" by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      The wealthy are corrupt because they lay false claim of ownership to the land, and whine about having to pay the costs of civilization (taxation).

      Fixed your autocorrect fails for you.

    5. Re:"Holy shit!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU, are the enemy.

      you haven't gotten that yet?

    6. Re:"Holy shit!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The government is corrupt because they lay false claim of ownership to the land, and the subjects/citizens object about having to pay the costs of a barbaric, unjust, unfair, civilization based on thuggery (taxation)."

      Fixed that For You :)

      Remove all taxation and unfair land ownership claims, and you will live in a much better society. The costs to an economy and people's standard of living is huge with high taxation. As taxation is lowered everything becomes less expensive, so low taxes (as an absolute and %) is less of a cost than higher tax.

      A lot of people don't want anything the governments are supplying. First off it is all tainted, the government supplies at a fraction of what it takes, and the things it supplies are either shoddy, or counter to what people want. The good stuff they keep for themselves. The government lot are shielded from the effects of taxation, as their pay is often linked to inflation. This is done so they don't complain about taxation, but it is the poor who are paying for them really.

      Taxation is not used virtuously, it is used to control the majority by the minority. The poor support the taxation of the rich, because of land inequality, but because of the way it works, the rich just increase the sale price, so the poor end up paying the tax. The benefits might go up for the poor, but not in relative terms. The poor need to focus on land (in)equality not taxation, the tax game is rigged.

      The poor often come out for their marches, thinking they are getting some benefit from taxation, and sure what is going on there is if they march for lower taxes, or abolishment of taxation, then the first thing they will cut is the benefits, the pork barrel projects still go through.

      And, of course the government doesn't actually need the tax payer. Governments borrow money from the banks or insurance companies, to pay for their control system. The lenders of the money clause it that the money will be repaid via taxation over time. This gives governments quite a lot of lee way, they can tune the control to extract the money by changing the law and enacting other projects.

      There is also this to consider, if tax is 100% or 0% then revenue will be 0, so the optimum point of taxation as a percentage is where the revenue is maximised, which is going to be between 100 - 0, and low taxation as a % can actually bring in more taxation as an absolute and in relative terms. This is really what the politicians are up to, they are trying to maximise taxation, that's what they are employed to do, and that's their objective.

    7. Re:"Holy shit!" by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      The costs to an economy and people's standard of living is huge with high taxation.

      Low taxes have high costs. You pay far, far more for health care and education in the United States compared to other countries, with worse results. Yeah, it's great that Elitist U gave you a marginally better engineering degree than some shmoe who went to a Romanian community college - but the Romanian didn't gradate with five figures of student debt.

      Capitalism is not used virtuously, it is used to control the majority by the minority.

      Fixed that, too.

      Look, all this Libertarian angst is just frustration that the rich actually have to pay back a pittance of the total that they exploit from the land, from consumers, from workers. I know you'd all like to go back to the Libertarian Golden Age of the 19th century, where the .01% would pay workers starvation wages to work in coal mines - and then get all that money back by paying the workers in company scrip that could only be used in company stores.

      I'll let you in on a little secret: high taxation rates (on the wealthy) is labor camp insurance for bourgeoisie elitists such as yourself. If you're lucky. Guillotine insurance if you're not. Abuse the proles too much with your boot heel on the back of their necks, and sooner or later they're going to get fed up with your capitalist nazi bullshit and come for your head. So STFU, get over your elitist sense of entitlement, and pay your goddamn taxes.

  14. Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on my way home from work one night after working a double shift. It was around 11:30 at night and I decided to stop at the local liquor store to pick up a cold beer and head on home. I had picked up some videos earlier that day and figured I would go home and have a little private party with myself.

    When I pulled into the parking lot of the liquor store I noticed this man standing in front, talking on his cell phone. It was the middle of summer and he was standing there on the phone bare chested, in a pair of jeans, his shirt draped over his shoulder. He stood about 6 ft, not an ounce of body fat on him, two quarter sized nipples. He had a wonderful spray of hair across his pecs that met in the middle then ran down to his navel. But his most impressive feature was the bulge that was running down his leg.

    I pulled up close and pretended to look for something in my glove box. I had the top down on my convertible, so I could listen to what he was saying on the phone. He was talking to some one named Nandini, begging her to let him come over and have some fun. I got the feeling she wasn’t into it by the way he pleaded with her. “Come on, I’m right outside, just look out” he said as he grabbed his crotch and turned in the direction of an apartment complex just across the parking lot.

    He must have seen me looking at him, because he suddenly turned to face the wall. I decided to go ahead inside and pick up a six pack. When I came out of the store he was still standing there but had hung up the phone. I got in the car and noticed that he was watching me. He had leaned up against the newspaper machine and was holding his hands over his crotch in an attempt to try to hide it. But that was a task for him since his cock must have been at least 9 inches long with a huge head. I could see it throbbing through the fabric of his jeans. I took my time getting into my car, memorizing the whole scene, so I could jack off to the image later.

    I lit up a smoke before I turned the key in the ignition and got a little shock when I noticed him walking over toward me. He leaned in and asked if he could beg a cigarette from me. I gave him one and lit it for him. He thanked me and proceeded to strike up a conversation. I turned the ignition back off and talked to him for a few minutes. He told me that he had been seeing this girl named Nandini and that they were supposed to have a date tonight but that she had gone back to her boyfriend or husband and had cancelled on him. He asked if I would mind running him back up to the bar. Like an idiot I spouted out that I’d run him anywhere he wanted to go. Not realizing until I said it how easy I must have sounded to him. But he agreed to agree to the ride and wanted me to take him back to the bar that he had just come from.

    He got in the car and then I started it up and backed out of the lot. The bar wasn’t in the best area of town, but I didn’t care. . It’s not often I get to look at a dick of his stature. He kicked the videos that were in the floorboard of the car and picked them up. When he looked at the titles I think he realized that I was gay and I thought I saw his cock start to swell again. He asked about the tapes and I told him that I was returning them for a guy that I worked with since I didn’t want to get beat up. He said “OH” and then asked if I was gay. I told him that I was bisexual and that I hoped he wasn’t upset. He looked at me and said he wasn’t at all and then unbuttoned his jeans and took my hand from the steering wheel and placed it inside his pants. “ Is there anything here you’d like to play with?”, he asked as I started running my hands over his hardening. “Anytime, anywhere” I told him. With that he told me to take a right at the next light that he knew a place where we could play.

    When I got to the street, I took a left and we drove for about 10 minutes and it was a dead end street that they were building on. So we should be a

    1. Re:Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Moron.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homophobe.

    3. Re:Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arsehole - why dont you post this on some porn story site. /. is not the place for this crap.

    4. Re: Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! I was reading the entire story and failed to see the connection. Then I reread the title and had to laugh out loud. Thanks for sharing!

    5. Re:Here's some H1B Indian "Insourcing"! by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 0

      It's so neat of you to paste loads of words that nobody will ever read.

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
  15. My Mom's Disgusting Boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My mother introduced me to her boyfriend, Trey, for the first time when I was 18 years old. It was the beginning of my senior year in high school and I was pretty innocent in many ways. Even though I had started to date by that time and even had tried sex once or twice, I was a pretty naïve teenager.

    Mom and I had been alone since my father died when I was 9 and since then, she hadn’t dated much. Actually, I don’t remember her dating at all until Trey came along. I’m certain that she grieved for my dad for way too long, which explains my extreme happiness when my mom came home from work one day and informed me that she had met a new man.

    I remember that day vividly because I was always concerned that my mom would be alone for the rest of her life. Now, I should explain that my mom wasn’t ugly or a bitch or anything. In fact, she was (and still is) quite beautiful and nice, and many younger men asked out my mom during this time, not realizing that she was already in her mid-30’s. The fact that she frequently exercised in order to maintain her cute body helped attract a fair amount of men. And her long, wavy, golden blonde hair, large breasts, flat stomach, and flawless complexion probably worked to her advantage as well (characteristics I am proud to say I inherited, although I am a bit shorter than her at 5’4”). I remember occasionally, some people thinking my mom was my older sister, which, of course, always made my mom’s day.

    Anyway, my mom had been fixed up with Trey, a (cough) used car salesman, by one of her married friends. I remember thinking what a curious match for her- a used car salesman. Since my mom is a lawyer, I always figured someone with more education would be most ideal for her.

    Anyway, my mom and Trey had already gone out on a few dates and she wanted me to meet him that next Saturday night. Mom seemed quite excited about Trey and I was anxious to meet him. Perhaps our blind optimism contributed to the chaos that followed. I’m not sure. But I can say that our lives were never the same after Trey entered our lives.

    ***

    Saturday night finally arrived and it was refreshing to see my Mom all made up for her date. She kept asking me for make-up and clothing advice and for once, I felt like the parent in our relationship. By the time Trey rang the doorbell, I can honestly say that my mom looked hot.

    I was sitting in the living room, watching television when I heard my mom open the front door and greet Trey.

    “You look fantastic, Linda!” a loud, masculine voice came from the hallway.

    “Thank-you,” I heard my mom answer. “Come I want you to meet my daughter.” I could tell from the way she spoke that she was embarrassed by his compliment.

    My mom subsequently led Trey into the living room. A handsome man, Trey stood about 6’2”, with short, dark hair, brown eyes, olive complexion, and a muscular build. With his thick, dark mustache, he sort of resembled Tom Selleck, I thought. He looked about 40 years old and was dressed casually, yet stylish.

    “Trey, I would like you to meet my daughter, Jessica,” my mom announced proudly.

    Trey smiled and looked directly into my eyes. He reached out for my hand and I accepted it. “Well, it is quite a pleasure to meet you, Jessica. I feel as if I know you already from what your mom has told me.” Trey shook my hand firmly and seemed to hold it a couple seconds too long.

    “YeahIt’s nice to meet you, too.” I said timidly. I broke eye contact with Trey after it became a bit uncomfortable. I then looked at my mom and asked, “So where are you guys going tonight?”

    My mom turned to Trey, “Dinner at Gibsons, right?”

    “Yep, I made reservations for 8 o’clock sharp.”

    My mom glanced down at her watch and then back at me, “Ok, then. We better get going. There’s money on the counter to order a pizza la

    1. Re:My Mom's Disgusting Boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off arsehole and take your porn to some site where it will be appreciated.

    2. Re: My Mom's Disgusting Boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the Indian sourcing porn story it was funny, now it is lame... you should have read Heinlein's The moon is a harsh mistress and learn on the difficulty if humor...

    3. Re:My Mom's Disgusting Boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone doesnt like the fact that its possible to comment anonymous coward. Looks like you didnt even get a negative score.

  16. Because these ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get paid on results, not by lines of code :)

  17. Uh "counter-extremist"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Guess they don't see what the fuck they're doing themselves

  18. report forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The report forgot to mention that 6/10 of the passwords checked out with the named owners.

  19. Old since March 2017 by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 2

    The whistleblower wrote his/her letter in march 2017 already. Look at the articles of The Grauniad in the related articles bar towards the end. You can guess how much information will have not been shredded in between.

    The cops break the law individually and as an organization, and get away with it because the law is set up so that the cops may break it at will.

  20. "hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving a laundry list of login and passwords to Indian subcontractors seems the way to go.
    I am quite sure with the Indian famous ethic of works nobody will have problems of stolen id, or money stolen.

  21. Foreigners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't they all foreigners over there?

  22. They've always been Stasi by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Why do they always target innocent protesters for illegal surveillance?

    Because that's been the FBI's purpose from day one. It came out of the Palmer Raids, a government assault on unions and leftists. Suppressing the left by any means necessary has always been the primary purpose of the FBI. Intelligence agencies are no more about protecting Americans than cops are about establishing justice. Their true purpose is order. Specifically, a right-wing capitalist order.

  23. Oh no need to check my hotmail and aol accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Indian haxers are da shit. Best watch your Hotmail and AOL accounts.