Slashdot Mirror


'U Can't Talk to Ur Professor Like This' (nytimes.com)

Millennial college students have become far too casual when they talk with their professors, reads an opinion piece on The New York Times. Addressing professors by their first names and sending misspelled, informal emails with text abbreviations have become common practices (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; here's a syndicated source) among many students than educators would like, Molly Worthen, an assistant professor of history at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill adds. From the article: Over the past decade or two, college students have become far more casual in their interactions with faculty members. My colleagues around the country grumble about students' sloppy emails and blithe informality. "When students started calling me by my first name, I felt that was too far, and I've got to say something," Mark Tomforde, a math professor at the University of Houston said. Sociologists who surveyed undergraduate syllabuses from 2004 and 2010 found that in 2004, 14 percent addressed issues related to classroom etiquette; six years later, that number had more than doubled, to 33 percent. This phenomenon crosses socio-economic lines. My colleagues at Stanford gripe as much as the ones who teach at state schools, and students from more privileged backgrounds are often the worst offenders. [...] Insisting on traditional etiquette is also simply good pedagogy. It's a teacher's job to correct sloppy prose, whether in an essay or an email. And I suspect that most of the time, students who call faculty members by their first names and send slangy messages are not seeking a more casual rapport. They just don't know they should do otherwise -- no one has bothered to explain it to them. Explaining the rules of professional interaction is not an act of condescension; it's the first step in treating students like adults.

63 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. Daycare for adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is basic stuff, and they graduate high school without learning it. What did they put on their college application, a plagiarized form letter?

    1. Re:Daycare for adults by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is basic stuff, and they graduate high school without learning it.

      First day of Junior Engineering in the eighth grade, the instructor told us that "Yo!" wasn't an appropriate classroom response. We also got advice on brushing our tongue when brushing our teeth and using deodorant.

    2. Re:Daycare for adults by Notabadguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is basic stuff, and they graduate high school without learning it. What did they put on their college application, a plagiarized form letter?

      Are you kidding?

      40% of American High School GRADUATES (yes, graduates) can't read or write. They get graduated anyway. Front cover of Time Magazine.

      These little assfaces get participation trophies for showing up and told that everyone is a winner. They think that they're ahead of their peers for knowing how to plagiarize a form letter.

      And sadly, they're mostly not wrong.

    3. Re:Daycare for adults by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      How many of those graduates go on to college? Are you talking about the same group of people?

      I'm not even sure this is the topic, it seems like the topic is the lack of formality and arbitrary forms of respect.

    4. Re:Daycare for adults by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      What did they put on their college application, a plagiarized form letter?

      I suppose technically it qualifies as that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Daycare for adults by Triklyn · · Score: 2

      http://www.nationalreview.com/...

      no, just #blacklivesmatter 100 times.

      because fuck standards.

    6. Re:Daycare for adults by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      40% of American High School GRADUATES (yes, graduates) can't read or write. They get graduated anyway. Front cover of Time Magazine.

      Do you have a source? I would expect at least a link to the issue of Time that had such an article.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re: Daycare for adults by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      1) you aren't paying the professor. You are paying a company (University) to provide a service. The professor is the employee of the university, not the employee of the students.
      2) not understanding the above is why you are a shit person to be around, and why you will not be missed. Ever.

  2. Don't talk like that to ANYONE by Tukz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to be taking just mildly serious, don't talk like that to anyone.

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    1. Re:Don't talk like that to ANYONE by avandesande · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are foolish to believe this. Showing professionalism is just a tool (of many) in your tool belt for getting things done. Sometimes it's the only one that will work.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Don't talk like that to ANYONE by Dread_ed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It works when other "professionals" are watching and the "professional" you are talking to has fears about their status and the ability of other "professionals" in their periphery to attack them and gain status.

      Otherwise, familiarity and vernacular are the lingua franca that bridge the gaps between apparent status, position, privilege, race, creed, and sexual preference.

      My take is if it is a graded exercise, feel free to grade their writing. If it is not a graded exercise and you are looking at a text or an email written in the spare time the student has available, be a human being and relax. As long as their message is decipherable with negligible effort, reply as you would to any eloquently worded prose. You might even want to pump it up a bit, choose some big words that challenge them. Make em bust out the ol' dictionary app to figure out what you just wrote. There is more than one way to educate. Example is one.

      If the purpose is to educate the student, and the student is engaged enough to initiate conversation about that process, aborting the conversation by rejecting that interaction in the infant stages with complaints about their writing style might leave their embryonic relationship with you, the material, and your class, stillborn.

      Once you have a relationship it is easier to correct, or let's call it what it is, influence the individual. Common ground, common purpose, reciprocation, and familiarity go much farther than authoritative edicts, accusations of ignorance, and pejorative pronouncements. If you are a professor and you haven't learned this you may be in the game for the wrong reason. You are a dick and no one is helped by your presence, least of all yourself.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  3. Dude by MountainLogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Y did u flunk mezzzzz?

    1. Re:Dude by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This is an automated reply. Your message has been rejected by the proper-grammar-check component of our spam filter. Please revise your message and try again."

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  4. Depends on the school... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    The community college I went to was pretty laid back with most instructors being called by their last name. The other community college in the district was more uptight with instructors insisting on being called "Instructor" before their last name. Never understood that stick-up-the-wazoo attitude, as they were teaching the same material and getting paid the same rate.

    1. Re:Depends on the school... by Drethon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The community college I went to was pretty laid back with most instructors being called by their last name. The other community college in the district was more uptight with instructors insisting on being called "Instructor" before their last name. Never understood that stick-up-the-wazoo attitude, as they were teaching the same material and getting paid the same rate.

      I'm a full time engineer who has taught a few classes. I felt like things worked better when I wasn't really positioned above the student. I taught the classes as I'm an engineer and I'm going to try to bring you up to the same level of knowledge. How you e-mail me, how you address me, I don't really care as long as it isn't offensive. When we get to homework or projects, I will tell the students up front it better be written up properly or it will be graded down. But there is time for being formal and time where it just doesn't matter.

    2. Re:Depends on the school... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't mind if my students (Cambridge) call me by my first name. Formality can be polite, but it can also be a barrier to free exchange of ideas and that has no place in a university. I'd be very surprised if MPhil or PhD students didn't call me by my first name.

      That said, if you write me an email and can't be bothered to write in grammatically correct sentences then you've obviously decided that your time writing the email is more valuable than mine reading it and I'll respond accordingly, if at all.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Depends on the school... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can call people with their first names without implying very close familiarity because you still have the option of using a formal second person singular pronoun ("vos" in Latin, "Sie" in German, "vous" in French, "vy" in Russian or Czech, etc.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Depends on the school... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 2

      The teacher is a person who has knowledge of something important to the student and is in the service of imparting that knowledge. This is not a symmetrical situation, unlike working with coworkers who sometimes teach you and sometimes you them, in the class the flow always goes from the teacher to the student. Taken to the extreme, knowledge is sacred and if its transmission allows the student to survive and progress in their lives it needs a structure to direct that flow. The "archetypal" structure is always the teacher being above in the sense of respectful address, and that is so because it helps the whole process. Think of Pythagoras teaching his disciples the secrets of mathematics -- they can't address him with yo!. Respect for teacher is simply a pattern that has evolved among humans as optimal.

      All this to say, I bet where students have and show less respect for their teacher, they learn less.

  5. It's not Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only person I know who uses "U" and "ur" in serious correspondence is over 50 years old. It's not a millennial problem. It's an idiot problem.

    1. Re:It's not Millennials by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      Indeed, where I work the email I get from on high is frequently littered with abbreviations and acronyms. Granted most of it wouldn't be mistaken for leet speak but it's the same attitude of expecting everyone else to understand what they mean so that they can be lazy. The number of spelling and grammar mistakes is also appalling, given that they are using the same email client as I do which handily identifies spelling and grammar mistakes.

    2. Re:It's not Millennials by Dwedit · · Score: 2

      Also, today's new college students are generally not millennials, since that is defined as being born between 1980 and 1996.
      It's exactly like people complaining about the MTV generation with their short attention spans.

  6. No by jawtheshark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No. It is not the job of college professors to correct students unable to communicate correctly. That was the job of the high school teachers. Students unable to communicate correctly should not have been admitted to college, because they shouldn't have received their high school diploma.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:No by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is, some teachers could almost be accused of "promoting" overly casual correspondence with the kids in an attempt to look "hip" and to "connect with" the students.

      My son's sarcasm and lack of correctness took a nose dive the last year of elementary school, his teacher was a bad influence and encouraged sarcasm, and lack of respect for authorities. Something we've seen continue into middle school where we are confounded by the teachers there who seem to find my son's lack of respect for them amusing. (he doesn't understand why he can't come home and use the same lack of respect and sarcasm towards us that his teachers find amusing). I don't think some of these teachers realize the disservice they are doing the kids.

      When they get a job in the real world, 9 times out of 10, their employers won't be impressed with sarcasm, lack of proper communication skills, and lack of respect.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should realize that sarcasm is our bodies natural response to stupidity. Maybe your child is not the problem?

    3. Re:No by WolfgangVL · · Score: 2

      Nobody's explained to you that you talk up to your superiors with honorifics and formalized speech. Nobody's explained this because it's a history lesson. This is also why we didn't teach you how to make tithes to your Earldom.

      liek yeah bro u know it dis is the way we talk at each other now proper eglish is ancient history dude btw why u fail me? i did the homeworkz and shit... i dont get it plz help i cant fail my dad will kill me lol okbye c u monday

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  7. (S)he who pays the bills... by irving47 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd never have used a professor's first name unless the age gap was minimal, and they had explicitly said it was OK... BUT... we walked half-way across campus in 95-degree heat in 90% humidity, to a temporary/portable building that sat maybe 30 students... Then we get told that unlike just about every other class we'd been in, this philosophy teacher (a condescending hippy, ironically, enough) didn't allow drinks... I watched an argument get pretty heated once, and started wondering, hey, who's paying who to be here?

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  8. In my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People have gotten much more informal with EVERYONE. They have no respect or perception of authority or seniority.

    Hell, 10+ years ago, Scrubs even did an episode where the (older) Kelso was trying to get through to this overweight girl about the dangers of surgery and she basically talked over him and Google'd everything as he spoke and he went on about how back-in-the-day, being a doctor "meant something" and you got things like free hair cuts, not to mention RESPECT.

    So if a comedy show noticed this 10+ years ago, it's been going on for a lot longer. I've gotten far in life simply by treating everyone with respect. People notice and appreciate it when you go out of your way to recognize their inherent human dignity.

  9. Re:Personalized personal pronouns by mr_mischief · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's almost as if both instructors and students prefer to be addressed in ways which make them comfortable and feel they deserve that basic level of respect.

  10. It goes both ways by Atmchicago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When my grandparents were in college, they were addressed by their professors as Mr. and Ms. Now, professors address their students by first name. I'm all for insisting on correct spelling and grammar, and for respecting the use of Dr. or Professor, but perhaps the faculty could win support if they treated their students like the adults they are.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:It goes both ways by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We you talk like an adult you will be treated like an adult.

  11. h8 crymes by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    nuf sed

    Humor aside, your instructor was correct. Professional life requires the ability to effectively communicate to a large audience. Appeasing your friends and acquaintances is not the same thing. Sadly we have had educators claiming what "you" want is all that matters, to the detriment of millions of students.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:h8 crymes by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly we have had educators claiming what "you" want is all that matters, to the detriment of millions of students.

      I don't blame the instructors for that. I blame the parents. If parents don't expect their children to behave, the children will have no expectations to follow. I grew up in a household that children were expect to be seen than heard or else the belt came out. Teachers always marveled how quiet and polite I was.

    2. Re: h8 crymes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Language doesn't just transfer direct meaning, but also signifies social status, politeness, education etc. Having a lack of social graces will make your boss hate you and your professors not treat you seriously. It just reflects that we live in a society with socially-enforced hierarchies, and that is not going away any time soon (nor should it)

    3. Re:h8 crymes by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I don't blame the instructors for that. I blame the parents. If parents don't expect their children to behave, the children will have no expectations to follow. I grew up in a household that children were expect to be seen than heard or else the belt came out.

      Hear, hear!!!

      Goodness, I wonder when it was that what used to be common sense and basic public etiquette disappeared?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re: h8 crymes by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is about language.

      My mother graduated from high school and swore like a French whore. My father graduated from the sixth grade, joined the Army and built buildings, swore less than my mother. I didn't learn language until I was in the sixth grade and my classmates taught me all the swear words to fill out a barnyard. However, behavior, politeness and desire to sit down prevented me from using language around adults.

      Specifically, English; which is an evolving language and has been since it separated from the Latin language.

      English was for commoners. Latin for priests. French for royalty. And drawings of penises for the illiterate.

    5. Re: h8 crymes by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Horseshit. This isn't about behaviour or politeness. This is about language. Specifically, English; which is an evolving language and has been since it separated from the Latin language.

      English as an evolving language has nothing to do with how people are addressed or the formality of the approach. The professor isn't complaining about people who "could care less" or who use the phrase "begs the question" in an outdated form. The only complaint is the casual approach. It's not more efficient, it's not more evolved, it's not less effort, it's just downright impolite.

      He's complaining about a social construct, so your "English is evolving" is completely irrelevant.

    6. Re: h8 crymes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Language does more than(1) transfer direct meaning, but also signifies social status, politeness, and(2) education(3). Lacking social graces will make social interactions difficult(4). It (5) reflects that we live in a society with socially-enforced hierarchies, and those are(6a) not going away any time soon (nor should they(6b)).(7)
      1. Eliminate negatives in your writing.
      2.The last point in a list should be conjoined with "and".
      3. Reserve "etc" for lists where the points are already stated elsewhere
      4. State only what you can prove.
      5. Eliminate filler words such as "just" or "like".
      6a & 6b. Singulars and Plurals in sentences must agree.
      7. Remember to end your sentences with a period.
      If you believe people who speak one way are better than people who speak another you are an uneducated person with outdated ideas.
      Figure it out.

    7. Re: h8 crymes by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Chaucer was two centuries earlier. His stuff sure doesn't look like Latin to me, but that's not really the point.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re: h8 crymes by EndlessNameless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is all true yet irrelevant.

      There is polite or formal speech, which is what professionals should use unless they are certain that casual communication is appropriate.

      If one of the primary purposes of college is to prepare young adults for employment, then enforcing "office manners" is a reasonable measure.

      Using text shorthand in an email is on par with wearing a T-shirt to an interview. It's not illegal, and it may be acceptable in some circumstances---but in most cases it is not wise.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    9. Re: h8 crymes by PhotoJim · · Score: 2

      Putting 'cause, with the apostrophe like that, is informal, but perfectly grammatical.

      Using cause for because without an apostrophe to indicate the missing syllable IS wrong, however. It's also frustrating because cause, as in cause and effect, is pronounced differently from the last syllable of because. I prefer "cuz" to "cause", but autocorrect has gotten rid of that, it seems.

    10. Re:h8 crymes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I don't agree that you need a belt either.

      It is not only not needed, it is counterproductive. There is overwhelming evidence that corporal punishment tends to produce kids that have worse behavior, poor impulse control, are more likely to resort to violience, and more likely to end up in prison.

      Disclaimer: I have whacked my son a few times, but I am not proud of it. My daughter, never, not once.

    11. Re: h8 crymes by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 3, Informative

      English is a Germanic (which is the grouping for all languages dominantly descendant from Old Norse) language with strong Gaelic influences and minor inclusion of vocabulary from other language groups including Latin and Greek, but also including Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, aboriginal Australian, the whole range of 15th century American cultures, and a fair splattering from less widespread language groups.

      English is a Germanic language, but neither it nor the Germanic languages in general descent from Old Norse. Rather, Old Norse is one of several Germanic languages, and more or less contemporary with Old English. Modern English has some indirect influence from Old Norse via the Vikings (and even more indirectly via the Normans), but both languages evolved from Proto-Germanic, English via West Germanic (with a lot of influence fron Northern Germanic), Old Norse more directly from Northern Germanic.

      --

      Stephan

    12. Re:h8 crymes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      There are similar problems with children who are never punished and let run wild as well.

      You can punish a child without resorting to hitting them, and "letting them run wild" is not the only alternative.

    13. Re:h8 crymes by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Very few professionals need to communicate with a large audience. "Yo!" will suffice in general if it is in common usage.

      The professors are forgetting that their job is to provide the service their customer (Their student) is paying a lot of money for.
      If you want to dictate everything about this relationship, then become like Google and provide your service for free, take it or leave it.

    14. Re: h8 crymes by sudon't · · Score: 2

      English was for commoners. Latin for priests. French for royalty.

      Probably the 16th century when Shakespeare started writing for the unwashed masses, as English was the commoner's language.

      Only until the thirteenth century, actually. Once King John lost Normandy in 1204, and once this was accepted as a permanent situation, there began a conscious effort at "Englishness" in order to differentiate themselves from the French enemy, and the nobility began to use English. Since that time, (say, 1300), English has been the common language of the English people of all classes, although many French words had been adopted. By Shakespeare's time, (b. 1564), English was spoken by all Englishmen as their first language, and had been for over two centuries. Latin was already a dead language by 1204, but learned as a second language by educated people, (not just the clergy).

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    15. Re: h8 crymes by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Language does more than(1) transfer direct meaning, but also signifies social status, politeness, and(2) education(3).

      I wouldn't comment but since you corrected the previous poster:

      "But" used as a conjunction must contrast the previous statement or declare all other possibilities impossible. When you change a positive to a negative you should also check the statement which follows.

      "Language does more than transfer direct meaning, it also signifies social status, politeness, and education."

      If you believe people who speak one way are better than people who speak another you are an uneducated person with outdated ideas.

      Practice what you preach and state only what you can prove. There is no evidence to correlate a person's opinion on language to their education level, at least not in the direction you are implying.

      Also he didn't say better, he said it signifies social status, politeness, education, etc. For someone who insisted on correcting someone else's English you're surprisingly illiterate.

      Now go ahead and correct mine. I won't be angry, it's not my first language.

  12. Re:Personalized personal pronouns by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But on the other hand, some students are starting to demand that professors address them according to the personal pronouns with which they personally identify.

    To which all professors should respond with some variant of "You're welcome to your own self-image, but I am not required to participate in it."

  13. Re:hey Mark by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Funny

    the usa is ranked round 23rd in math and god knows what in literacy

    *Around

    your all doomed there ok , if you want to teach kids that might actually learn move to another nation

    *You're

    I'd also like to see proper sentence capitalization, and punctuation usage other than excessive exclamation marks. Really, do 13 exclamation marks somehow add more to a sentence than a single one?

    Overall I give that post a D. While comprehensible, it needs a lot of work.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  14. Teacher Truth Bomb by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look to your left. Now look to your right. None of you are going to have jobs after you graduate, and you'll each be in debt for a couple of hundred grand. So it doesn't matter how you fucking address the fucking professor. You're still gonna be fucked.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. Re:Personalized personal pronouns by johanw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Henceforward you will address me as "my lord", "sire" or "your majesty". Failure to do so will result in failing this class.

  16. nobody told them by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > They just don't know they should do otherwise -- no one has bothered to explain it to them.

    Or, their parents have explained it to them, like, a bazillion times, and they just roll their eyes and do whatever the hell they were going to do anyway.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  17. Re:Two different problems. by green1 · · Score: 2

    Calling someone by a title doesn't indicate respect, it indicates obedience.

    I don't demand that others call me by a title. And I've never requested it of my students either, but then again, I teach in a professional setting where we assume people are adults and don't use childish tricks like this to make them "prove it" to us.

  18. Re: Personalized personal pronouns by Potor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's so scary that university administration has so warped our students that they believe this crap.

  19. You are Eric Raymond AICMFP by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/s...

    "We've found by experience that people who are careless and sloppy writers are usually also careless and sloppy at thinking and coding (often enough to bet on, anyway). Answering questions for careless and sloppy thinkers is not rewarding; we'd rather spend our time elsewhere."

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  20. Re:Quite appropriate by bws111 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is called courtesy, which even 'the help' deserve. Also respect, as your professor is no doubt superior to you in knowledge (or you made a really bad choice in who you decided to pay), and probably older than you as well. You are probably one of those obnoxious asses who snaps his fingers at waiters, just to show who is paying who.

  21. Whatever works by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    My teacher introduced himself as "Professor Blank", so I called him that. OTOH, I had no problem with him calling me by my first name. I never really thought of myself as a "Mr. Magnon" anyway.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  22. Proper communication isn't dead by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's fashionable to have flat, zero-hierarchy organizations and brief communications styles, but I can tell you from 20+ years of working, clear spoken and written communication is not some irrelevant concept from a bygone age. I'm not one of those people who demands respect simply because of a rank or power dynamic, but I will have a lot more respect for someone who addresses others politely, states their opinions like adults, listens to others' points of view, and can write clearly. It also works both ways -- in my experience I have been able to get much further in having people see things my way than colleagues with more abrupt communication styles.

    I am firmly in the introvert crowd, and not a salesy type in the least. But, no matter how introverted you are, learning a few common social courtesies is critical to being successful in any setting. I'm not even talking about ladder-climbing brown-nosing style success -- I know part of the reason I'm kept around and allowed to do interesting technical work is that my bosses know I'll make them look good and be professional; in short, they don't have to worry I'll say something stupid.

  23. Yo dawg that b phat ya feel me. by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    yo dawg that b phat n shit
    ya feel me dawg

    Words have two types of meaning, both connotation and denotation. Two words may have the exact same denotation, but quite different connotation.

    The primary purpose of clothing is clothing is to cover the skin. Other purposes of clothing, such as "saggin" pants, dress shirts, and lab coats include communicating information about one's values, role in the current context, and standards of behavior. Certain clothing suggests that the wearer believes snitches get stiches, other clothing indicates the opposite.

    Similarly, the tone of language communicates all of the above and much more. If you are unable to understand the difference between "yo dawg u b trippin" and "Sir, I believe your perspective may lack appropriate context", you may be lacking an essential skill. The two sentences convey quite different connotations, though the same denotation.

    1. Re:Yo dawg that b phat ya feel me. by ghoul · · Score: 2

      I would love to see a rap video where someone in saggy pants goes "Sir, I believe your perspective may lack appropriate context"

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  24. Re:Two different problems. by sjames · · Score: 2

    OTOH, "the" is properly spelled with thorn (the letter of the alphabet). But some young wags started spelling it with "th" or sometimes "y". Note it is still correctly pronounced as "the", not "yee". The latter is a word (spelled "ye" now but once spelled "ge") that has fallen entirely out of favor except in a few very formal and somewhat ritualistic settings.

    Of course, formal writing generally should avoid the latest trends, yet it would be quite confusing (and annoying) if it insisted on Middle English. Today's informal writing is tomorrow's formal writing.

  25. Re: Personalized personal pronouns by BeanThere · · Score: 2

    I'm also a 'technologist who works with academics' and I find your comments bizarre. That 'three-five minute self-introduction of themselves' is the part where I like to listen most clearly, as understanding where someone is coming from, their context, what they're working on, what they want to solve, is the single-most important thing to ensure I'm giving them effective solutions that they are actually looking for, i.e. that I'm going to be offering something of value to them.

    And knowing someone's title is just a trivial, basic matter of respect in the academic. If you keep calling someone who has earned a doctorate "Mister" then yeah, they're probably going to keep getting annoyed about it, because you're being sloppy and disrespectful, you seem to have a chip on your shoulder, and I would never hire you, because that same sloppiness is probably going to translate to the work you do also. If you can't even remember someone's title, you probably can't remember basic things relating to the technical problems at hand.

  26. Re:Personalized personal pronouns by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    What I don't understand is why people don't think it's polite to not address people the way they want to be addressed. With a very few exceptions, I don't give a crap about other people's sex organs or gender or whatever, so why not call people what they want to be called?

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  27. Re:Quite appropriate by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    Well, learn how to fucking make them then. I'm too busy with the career kickstarted by a BSc from one of the world's top five business schools.

    Lol, yeah, sure you are. And I just got hired by NASA to be a door gunner on the Space Shuttle.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...