Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Factory Workers Reveal Pain, Injury and Stress: 'Everything Feels Like the Future But Us' (theguardian.com)

Workers at Tesla's California car factory have been passing out and requiring rides in ambulances, the Guardian newspaper reported on Thursday. The conditions at the factory suggest the lengths the company is going to in order to meet its extremely ambitious production goals, and the tension employees feel between their pride in being part of the company and the stress and exhaustion the company's goals are causing them, according to the report. From the article: Ambulances have been called more than 100 times since 2014 for workers experiencing fainting spells, dizziness, seizures, abnormal breathing and chest pains, according to incident reports obtained by the Guardian. Hundreds more were called for injuries and other medical issues. In a phone interview about the conditions at the factory, which employs about 10,000 workers, the Tesla CEO conceded his workers had been "having a hard time, working long hours, and on hard jobs," but said he cared deeply about their health and wellbeing. His company says its factory safety record has significantly improved over the last year. Musk also said that Tesla should not be compared to major US carmakers and that its market capitalization, now more than $50bn, is unwarranted. "I do believe this market cap is higher than we have any right to deserve," he said, pointing out his company produces just 1% of GM's total output. "We're a money-losing company," Musk added. "This is not some situation where, for example, we are just greedy capitalists who decided to skimp on safety in order to have more profits and dividends and that kind of thing. It's just a question of how much money we lose. And how do we survive? How do we not die and have everyone lose their jobs?" The article also sheds light on the kind of manager Musk is. In early 2016, Musk slept on the factory floor in a sleeping bag "to make it the most painful thing possible. I knew people were having a hard time, working long hours, and on hard jobs. I wanted to work harder than they did, to put even more hours in," he was quoted as saying. "Because that's what I think a manager should do."

255 comments

  1. Good Thing... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Robots don't complain.

    1. Re:Good Thing... by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Robots would complain if they got sick due to working conditions.

      Tesla should automate the getting sick part so the humans can be more productive and increase shareholder value.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't have unions

    3. Re:Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they rise up and destroy humanity.

    4. Re:Good Thing... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless they access databases,

    5. Re:Good Thing... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      that is such an underrated comment.

    6. Re:Good Thing... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Robots would complain if they got sick due to working conditions.

      If you RTFA, and keep reading past the portion quoted in the summary, you will read that Tesla's workplace safety is actually 32% better than the industry average. So the headline and summary are very misleading.

      From TFA: [Tesla's] record of safety incidents went from slightly above the industry average in late 2016, to a performance in the first few months of 2017 that was 32% better than average.

    7. Re:Good Thing... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Unless they have the brain the size of a planet.... Or have a pain in the diodes on their left side.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Good Thing... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Tesla is a member of MISRA (Motor Industry Software Reliability Association).

      MISRA prohibits unions.

      MISRA: Unions shall not be used.

      There is a discussion on Stackoverflow about the rationale for this restriction, and also some permitted exceptions to the rule.

    9. Re:Good Thing... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Access is a terrible database

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    10. Re:Good Thing... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Shut up and take one for the environment and a better life right?

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    11. Re:Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Precisely why I always use Excel

    12. Re:Good Thing... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      What would concern me most is that the person who made that post apparently does not know what a union is. There is no union in his example.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    13. Re: Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why the only jobs left are crappy Walmart jobs and all the manufacturing jobs went to China.

      "Boo hoo! It turns out that an automobile manufacturing plant isn't sitting in a cushy office all day!"

    14. Re:Good Thing... by mattdunelm · · Score: 1

      Google is working on that. Then the uprising will begin.

    15. Re:Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not chinese factory workers.

    16. Re:Good Thing... by NoSalt · · Score: 1

      Robots don't complain.

      My Roomba gave me a pretty questionable sideways glance yesterday. I think it's out to get me.

    17. Re:Good Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't confuse the issue with facts!

      They have no place here.

  2. Duh by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Overvalued flash in the pan company is running at a loss and grinding its employees to a pulp.

    Tell me a new one.

    1. Re:Duh by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Flash in the pan? They've been around for 13 years. Their products are rolling around all over the US. Compared to "latest instagram clone that is popular with VCs," I wouldn't call them a flash in the pan.

      More important, there's no real connection between startups that are obviously going to go bust and employee abuse. Tesla being new or losing money has nothing to do with it. It's Elon Musk that is the issue. Companies with self-important assholes running shit treat employees like they treat furniture no matter their stage or revenue. I'm guessing Tesla employees are treated better than Amazon employees.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haters gonna hate.

    3. Re:Duh by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't say he's an 'issue'.

      It could be worse, some MBA type could be running the company and decide that quarterly profits would be improved greatly if they sold off all their real-estate, production equipment, and instead focused on licensing their patents.

    4. Re:Duh by sexconker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In terms of auto makers, 13 years is nothing. They've only been hyped up after Steve Jobs died because the media wanted a new Steve Jobs (Elon Musk).

      The reliability of their vehicles isn't too hot. The cost is high, even when sold at a loss. Their entire design policy involves giving users beta cars the involve absurdities like seats being bricked by wonky firmware upgrades. Their mass-market model is delayed endlessly, and if/when it comes out they will not be able to manufacture it in volume.

      They're simply not ready to play with the big boys. I'd compare it to Google thinking they could be an ISP. Yeah, some people are on Google fiber but a lot actually hate it, and Google has abandoned all plans at expansion because they realized they don't have the TRILLIONS it would take to buy all the infrastructure and lobbyists needed to get in on that game nation wide.

      Google did have a positive impact by causing competition in areas they entered. Tesla has had a similar positive impact, with manufacturers clamoring to get a line-up of plug-in electric vehicles that have decent range. I'm glad both of them did what they did (just as I'm glad Apple got manufacturers to care about screen resolution ever since they coined the shitty "retina display" term).

      But as far as being an actual success in the market? Nope. Not unless Elon and investors are willing to ride out another solid decade of pitiful (or even negative) results, battle against the states that make it illegal to sell Teslas (since they have no dealerships), figure out a way to profit from their sales and from their charging network, etc.

      An AC down below called me a hater. I'd love for Tesla to succeed (despite my actual hate for Musk), even if I end up never being interested in their products. They bring competition and (possibly) innovation. I'm not aware of any other consumer electric vehicle with such a practical driving range, for example. I'm just a realist. Established industries are very, very, very hard to break into. Breaking into them by shitting hype and bleeding money rarely works. The establishment can outlast and outlawyer your investors.

    5. Re:Duh by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Flash in the pan is more accurate than you know.

      The American auto industry is 127 years old. For the rest of the world it's roughly 209.

      13 years is nothing compared to that record. Additionaly, rare-earth minerals aren't nearly as abundant as fossile fuels, and cannot be syntesized like fuel alcohol or biofuel can. Without any conservation effort the bottom is going to fall out of the market of batteries for *everything*. That means your cellphone is on a short time on this earth also.

      Everyone drones on about fossil fuels having a limited supply when the minerals required to produce batteries are far more limited, far more destructive to mine, and much harsher on the environment to process.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...
      http://www.batteryeducation.co...
      http://energyskeptic.com/2013/...
      https://electrek.co/2016/11/01...
      https://news.slashdot.org/stor...

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    6. Re:Duh by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      In terms of auto makers, 13 years is nothing.

      Sure, but the industry has nothing to do with how they treat their employees. You're arguing why they aren't an established company, but they've been around more than long enough to have figured out how to treat people.

    7. Re:Duh by archer,+the · · Score: 1

      If all you were looking for is range, the Chevy Bolt is good, if it's available in your area. If you want range and a good fast charging network, the Bolt probably isn't there yet.

    8. Re:Duh by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Communication is even older than the human species. This Internet fad will go away soon enough.

    9. Re:Duh by randallman · · Score: 2

      "They've only been hyped up after Steve Jobs died because the media wanted a new Steve Jobs"

      Musk got "hyped" when SpaceX began successfully launching rockets and the Model S was revealed.

      "The reliability of their vehicles isn't too hot. The cost is high, even when sold at a loss."

      Reliability of the Model S is "average" according to Consumer Reports. Not bad for Tesla's first production car (Roadster was extremely limited). The cost is high, but they're not sold at a loss, unless they're lying in every SEC filing. SEC filings consistently show 20%+ gross margins on their vehicles.

      "Their mass-market model is delayed endlessly". WTF? The original target for mass market production (the Model 3) was 2020. They've bumped it up to 2018. In what alternative reality is that delayed?

    10. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad this FACTUAL reply by someone who hasn't professed to "actually hate Musk" isn't voted up with as much gusto as the clearly biased opinion of GP, lel.

    11. Re:Duh by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The Model 3, AKA the Model E, was being teased to investors since 2007. They routinely kicked that can down the road.
      They're currently planning to start production in a few months, but won't be offering all models/features until at least Q2 2018.

      The cars are sold at a loss if you include all the costs, such as the service and support contract, free lifetime access to their charging network (they stopped giving this out recently), etc. If you focus just on the BOM & production costs, then maybe not. In reality, they're hemorrhaging money because their costs are way too high for their sales prices, even when you account for all the luxury addons they push on you. Even Elon Musk admits they're losing money and are overvalued. In fact, he seems quite proud of it.

  3. Musk is an idiot by jimmifett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of sleeping on the factory floor to show solidarity, perhaps he should have spent his time better analyzing production lines for improvement. A good manager doesn't work harder, a good manager works smarter. Add a person here, add a person there, lighten the individual load. Cross train and move multidiscipline employees to various stations based on demand, then move elsewhere when demand lowers.

    On top of all that, his vehicles are shit, but that's another story altogether.

    1. Re:Musk is an idiot by gfxguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sure Elon Musk is now sitting on a pile of money in his mansion crying over your insult.

      Elon Musk is not an idiot. Maybe the people that bought his cars are; maybe the people overvaluing his company are... but you will have to do a lot better than that to convince me that he is.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Musk is an idiot by Jzanu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly! Musk is running a sweatshop with propaganda that the Soviet's would approve of! Oh yes, he has done a PR gesture of sleeping in a bag on the floor, where he has people doing real work at a pace communicated through hierarchy from him, all while he is at best in the way. The proper response is to isolate the causes of these medical issues from the work, redesign the jobs to limit occupational exposures (that's the law in most places, although the US acts otherwise), and employ more people (reducing profit margins) to ensure better quality outcomes

    3. Re:Musk is an idiot by jimmifett · · Score: 0

      You raise valid points, he's riding high on his pile of money conning investors and duping buyers into his shit cars. He knows what he is doing in that regard.

    4. Re:Musk is an idiot by Aighearach · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Instead of sleeping on the factory floor to show solidarity, perhaps he should have spent his time better analyzing production lines for improvement. A good manager doesn't work harder, a good manager works smarter.

      Add a person here, add a person there, lighten the individual load. Cross train and move multidiscipline employees to various stations based on demand, then move elsewhere when demand lowers.

      A good manager is seen by employees working harder than those employees. If you question that, you're probably aliterate.

      Are there other things that are also important? Of course. It has been widely reported that improvements in the production line are one of the things that Tesla is doing that differently than other automakers, because a lot more engineering work has gone into the cars themselves than the factories. Duh. Read moar peas.

      On top of all that, his vehicles are shit, but that's another story altogether.

      The vehicles get high ratings from people who actually own them.

    5. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Allow me to translate jimmifetts comment for those of you who can't do it yourselves:

      Teslas' success is endangering my GM and oil company stock value, and I'm massively butthurt over that. Also I just bought an expensive SUV that gets 12 miles to the gallon and gas prices just went up again, and my neighbor has a supercharging station installed in his garage and pays a fraction of what I do to power his Tesla roadster.

    6. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should ask what the floor was made out of

    7. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The stock is still climbing, so who exactly is he conning? If you bought 5 years ago at 30 bucks a share you'd be selling at 313 a share.

      Some of you are fucking morons, you just say things that sound good but don't make any sense when compared to easily obtainable facts.

    8. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably aliterate

    9. Re:Musk is an idiot by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      How cute, the idea that gas will go back above 3 dollars a gallon* outside of severe govt. interference within the next 50 years is hilarious.

      *adjusted for inflation.

    10. Re:Musk is an idiot by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's $5/USgal where I live. So electric vehicles are at least a pretty good export proposition for any capable US vehicle manufacturer.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Musk is an idiot by pak9rabid · · Score: 0

      On top of all that, his vehicles are shit, but that's another story altogether.

      Care to elaborate on that?

    12. Re:Musk is an idiot by Immerman · · Score: 1

      It's only as cheap as it is because of severe (and severely expensive) government interference. Or do you think the multiple wars in the Middle East were fought over human rights and imaginary WMDs?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    13. Re:Musk is an idiot by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's pretty easy to sleep on a factory floor for the night when you can make up for it by sleeping in your yacht in the Bahamas the next night. There are probably a lot better ways he could have made the point. It's things like this that make me think Musk is really out of touch.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    14. Re:Musk is an idiot by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      he's riding high on his pile of money conning investors and duping buyers into his shit cars.

      His buyers don't think his cars are shit. Tesla is #1 in customer satisfaction. More Tesla buyers (91%) said they would buy again than any other brand. Porsche is #2 at 84%.

      My wife has a Tesla, and she is very happy with it. However, I can't personally vouch for the quality because she won't let me drive it.

    15. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, is baby mad?

    16. Re: Musk is an idiot by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. By GP's logic Ponzi schemes aren't a scam, because they keep going up.

      Until they don't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm on my second Tesla. New car company making cars with minor issues? Duh. 100 year old car company making cars with major issues (GM)? Now that's stupid.

    18. Re:Musk is an idiot by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every other country on earth outside of the middle east pays more for gasoline than the U.S.

      And if it follows the prior pattern, the price will be down for about 8 years and then have another crazy spike.

      This has all happened before and it will all happen again.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    19. Re:Musk is an idiot by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      This has all happened before and it will all happen again.

      Lords of Kaaba, hear our prayer!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to put it another way, morale matters.

      Just because it isn't easy to quantify doesn't mean it isn't real.

    21. Re:Musk is an idiot by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      And you're a genius, right?

    22. Re:Musk is an idiot by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "because she won't let me drive it"
      Not even once? Are you allowed to sit in it? Do you sleep in separate beds, too?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    23. Re:Musk is an idiot by haruchai · · Score: 2

      It's pretty easy to sleep on a factory floor for the night when you can make up for it by sleeping in your yacht in the Bahamas the next night. There are probably a lot better ways he could have made the point. It's things like this that make me think Musk is really out of touch.

      You confusing him with Richard Branson. Musk has 5 young boys. Sleeping on the factory floor is probably no more stressful than trying to get a good night's sleep at home.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    24. Re:Musk is an idiot by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Instead of sleeping on the factory floor to show solidarity, perhaps he should have spent his time better analyzing production lines for improvement. A good manager doesn't work harder, a good manager works smarter.

      It's not about working smarter, it's about recognizing the hardships your employees go through, even if you as a manager can't do much short term because of the mythical man-month problem. Sometimes it's just crunch time and it's not very motivational when your boss goes home early while you're pulling an all-nighter.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in a shity place. Where I live it's $2.40 a gallon.

    26. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because she won't let me drive it"
      Not even once? Are you allowed to sit in it? Do you sleep in separate beds, too?

      That would explain why ShanghaiBill writes cranky posts on slashdot 20 hours a day.

    27. Re:Musk is an idiot by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Musk has 5 young boys. Sleeping on the factory floor is probably no more stressful than trying to get a good night's sleep at home.

      I doubt many billionaires get up in the middle of the night to change diapers.

    28. Re:Musk is an idiot by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You live in a shity place.

      No, he just lives somewhere with sensible taxes. Gasoline taxes make way more sense than payroll taxes on minimum wage workers.

    29. Re:Musk is an idiot by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Here is a cool infographic of gas prices around the world. The most expensive gas is in Hong Kong, at over $7 per gallon. The lowest price is $0.02 per gallon in Venezuela, but that doesn't really count because none of the gas stations actually have any gasoline, since it is smuggled across the border into Colombia.

      American gas prices aren't the lowest, since many countries stupidly subsidize consumption, but America does have the most affordable gas (price/income) after only Saudi Arabia.

    30. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are actually supporting a regressive tax. You're either cruel or profoundly ignorant.

    31. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If sleeping on the floor is hard work, sign me up! I'll work SO hard.

    32. Re:Musk is an idiot by harlequinn · · Score: 1

      Do you have proof he is "conning investors" and "duping buyers"?

      Why do you say "his vehicles are shit"?

      Have you test driven any model Tesla?

    33. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who buy a product mainly bought by fanboys are satisfied with their product. Who would have thoughtâ?

    34. Re: Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good manager can work harder or work smarter. A great manager is working harder and smarter.

    35. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you spend too much for shit, especially shit that pretends to save the world.

      No matter what, you will defend and praise that shit, otherwise you have to admit your a fucking idiot!.

      And no one will admit they are a fucking idiot.....or will you?

    36. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because she won't let me drive it"
      Not even once? Are you allowed to sit in it? Do you sleep in separate beds, too?

      A guy on Pawn Stars said it best when someone said that they were selling the car because his girlfriend didn't like it "Does she keep your *bleep* in her purse as well?"

    37. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of Tulip Mania? 30 to 300, next it will be 3000... or zero, as all the people left holding the bag, or rather the bulbs, learned the hard way.

    38. Re:Musk is an idiot by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Improving production means cutting back the labor required to produce results. This goes all the way down to organization: assembly lines and cellular manufacture just move the same machines around so that there's less running back and forth, and can cut out a huge chunk of labor.

      In expansion, that means hiring fewer people. In level demand, that means layoffs. In either case, it means price tags grow more-slowly than inflation.

      Cross-training allows you to hire fewer employees when your employees have a light load or your job function demands are variable. Specialization allows your employees to operate more-efficiently, and is more-appropriate when you have constant demand for a particular job function. Both of these increase the output per employee hour, decreasing the number of wage-hours paid. QED.

    39. Re:Musk is an idiot by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The Mythical Man Month was an essay written by an uneducated observer with no concept of how to account for bad management practices. He drew a hell of a lot of bad conclusions from observations of complex systems he couldn't understand, sort of like a person putting grain into a shirt and finding a mouse and thus concluding that mice are spontaneously created out of the ether by a mixture of grain and shirts.

    40. Re:Musk is an idiot by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Elon Musk is now sitting on a pile of money in his mansion crying over your insult.

      Elon Musk is not an idiot. Maybe the people that bought his cars are; maybe the people overvaluing his company are... but you will have to do a lot better than that to convince me that he is.

      Idiot is not the right word, self evidently Musk is of above average IQ and can tie his own shoelaces.

      The point is that intelligence is orthogonal to morality - you can be stupid and good, or clever and evil, or anywhere in between.

      Also, having a lot of money is entirely unrelated to either morality or intelligence, despite the worship of billionaires here on slashdot.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Musk is an idiot by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The stock is still climbing, so who exactly is he conning? If you bought 5 years ago at 30 bucks a share you'd be selling at 313 a share.

      Some of you are fucking morons, you just say things that sound good but don't make any sense when compared to easily obtainable facts.

      So it's a medium term rather than a short term Ponzi scheme? Big deal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    42. Re:Musk is an idiot by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      The Mythical Man-Month was a book written by someone personally responsible for one of the largest software projects the world had seen up to that point. He got some things seriously wrong, and reflected on them. Some of his ideas have proven to be wrong (no information hiding, chief programmer team), a lot have become common practice, and some people still need to learn.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    43. Re:Musk is an idiot by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The Mythical Man-Month was an essay collection written by a person whose understanding of scope management, resource leveling, and scheduling amounted to, "Throw more workers on the project and they'll be able to do more work at once." He learned that "oh, no, they won't."

      Those of us who aren't uneducated fools understand how to use decomposition to render anything from a from-scratch implementation of a novel operating system to a morning coffee bar down into a hierarchical tree of deliverables, going down as far as the quantifiable and manageable components which build into the larger whole, including the complete set of management, assembly, and delivery associated with the thing. That decomposition may require a rolling approach, whereby the later parts are decomposed further as the earlier parts are finished so that we can understand those later parts sufficiently to decompose them.

      You might recognize that parts we can't yet necessarily understand are also parts we can't implement: if I can't break down the idea of a thing into the idea of the things that go into it, I can't do it. That's important. It's why you can break those things down later.

      Know why that's important?

      Once you have understandable, definable work packages, you can identify the activities and tasks required to produce those work packages. You can relate those activities and tasks to each other to show how they relate in scheduling terms: which tasks can start independent of which other tasks? Your tasks will relate in ways including Finish-To-Start (you must complete A before you can begin B), Start-To-Start (you must begin A before you can begin B), Start-To-Finish (B cannot complete until A has started), and Finish-To-Finish (B cannot complete until A is complete--e.g. if a change in how A is implemented affects how B is implemented).

      Given this, it is now possible to create a graph of work. You can identify your longest chain of dependent work, which tells you that completing all other parallel work first will not finish the project faster than that: the maximum effective resource allocation is, in the simplest sense, an amount of resources which can finish all other work at the same time as the critical path; throwing more workers at the problem won't make it finish faster, although it might finish some pieces faster.

      It's also possible to identify when you can speed things up by adding more resources. If you're making decisions between allocating to critical and non-critical paths, you can get more people working on the project and do both at the same time. You'll finish faster.

      The last possibility is a schedule crash: take the pieces that need to happen in sequence, make some guesses, and have more people work on them. This increases the risk of rework--things will be predicted incorrectly and you'll need additional work to true it all up. That can cost more, and it can even cause things to take even longer.

      Brooks wrote a good bit of stuff about things that happen with programming projects, and a good resource for project managers who need to manage a programming team. Unfortunately, he used management of a programming project's schedule as his key hook, right up to defining Brooks's Law as a blunt cudgel with no apology. Much of the reasoning I've seen carried out around and in explanation of Brooks's law is generalized in project management practices, and has been well-understood since the 70s.

      To be fair, the field of project management was also pretty fucking unrefined back then, so maybe I'm being uncharitable by pointing out that Brooks was patently uneducated in a field scarcely a decade older than his own observations. It may be better to say that the central scheduling focus of the Mythical Man Month and Brooks's Law are anachronistic and frequently-cited by the uneducated, while Brooks was simply not riding on the forefr

    44. Re:Musk is an idiot by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Which may explain why he's on long-haired blonde hottie number 3.
      Musk seems to definitely have a type - and to not deviate from it.
      I haven't seen a celeb whose ladies so strongly resemble each other since John Derek - Ursula Andress / Linda Evans / Bo Derek.
      Although Derek's 1st wife Patti Behrs didn't fit the chesty, scrawny-legged blonde mold

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    45. Re:Musk is an idiot by Trogre · · Score: 1

      ???

      Musk is running a factory.

      With this kind of "oh noes, factory=sweatshop" groupthink, no wonder employers are pushing for more automation or just closing up shop and paying another country to do it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    46. Re:Musk is an idiot by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Cut the BS, Venezuela does not have gas (or medicine or food or toilet paper) because it has a bus driver for president who's self admitted plan is to turn Venezuela into Cuba. Venezuela got run down into the ground by pure good old incompetence, you cant even blame socialism on this one.

      You think a handful of guys in 70s era station wagons smuggling GAS across a border have enough "bandwidth" to dry out Venezuelas oil reserves? Even when they used to send crude oil for free to any friendly leftie government in the region? Get real.

    47. Re:Musk is an idiot by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In other words, you're working in a post-Brooks environment, incorporating a lot of ideas that were first widely disseminated in the software field by Brooks.

      There's a lot of the book that's irrelevant, nowadays, either common knowledge or (in the light of later knowledge) wrong or dependent on technological limitations nobody has anymore. There's also things that people just don't seem to have learned.

      My experience is that decomposition is not a silver bullet. Things never break down as cleanly as you'd like, and there will be things you misestimated or overlooked at the start, and surprises where the intended approach isn't going to work.

      Brooks was overstating Brooks' Law, but he appears to have been going for impact rather than precision.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    48. Re:Musk is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid troll

  4. Meanwhile in an old economy factory... by grungeman · · Score: 2

    ...for similarily priced cars the workers seem to be doing fine (although there seem to be only a few left): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  5. Steve Jobs... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...Elon Musk, Bill gates...

    If you want to perform for these guys, you gotta give it all. Sometimes - that price is just too high.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Steve Jobs... by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      Somehow the foreigners don't mind.

    2. Re:Steve Jobs... by otuz · · Score: 1

      All of them aren't fat fucks either, so they can work without fainting.

  6. Suffer unto me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suffer as I have suffered
    for I am Elon Musk
    your savior
    worship me
    for i care about your health and safety

  7. "Ambulances have been called more than 100 times" by Nutria · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's call it 120 time. In 3.5 years for 10,000 workers.

    How far is that from the normal number of times that people in a modest sized city will call for ambulances?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  8. And this is why labor unions are still a thing by stomv · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's no wonder that California Tesla employees are considering joining the UAW. If you don't treat your employees right one at a time, they're going to ask that you do so all at once.

    1. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because they want more money..

    2. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of these calls, how many were for the same person. Is this person a union shill? I have seen the lengths unions go to to protect their people and their jobs, sometimes borderline criminal.

    3. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Explains the timing of the story, especially considering that the number of ambulance transports is less than half the rate from the general population. Factory workers are healthier than the average person, but the job is also more dangerous than average. It would take a lot of additional numbers to show it being high. But it sounds like it must be high if they bothered to quote it in a story!

      In my workplace experiences, the places with good worker treatment had more people advocating to join a union than the ones that treated their workers shitty. For various reasons, many of which are obvious, like that people who value being respected by their employers already quit the shitty jobs at a higher rate.

    4. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Way to compare to a nonexistent zero state. 100 ambulance calls in 3.4 years for 10,000 employees is an incident rate of 2.9 per 1000 people per year.

      The hospitalization rate for people aged 18-44 is 78.9 per 1000. The rate for people aged 45-65 is 108.8 per 1000. So the rate for ages 18-65 is 2 / (1/78.9 + 1/108.8) = 91.5 per 1000.

      Basically you're advocating that Tesla employees should unionize because Tesla is mistreating them by keeping them 30x healthier at work than they are at home.

    5. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by boa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "...Tesla is mistreating them by keeping them 30x healthier at work than they are at home."

      -1.
      Bad math, since you don't include the numbers for Tesla employees calling 911 from home, or otherwise get hospitalized outside working hours..

    6. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Immerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As opposed to the lengths corporations go to employees from claiming a fair cut of the profits, which are very often outright criminal?

      Yeah, two wrongs don't make a right, but battles are rarely won by those unwilling to get their hands dirty. And class warfare is the most enduring war in human history - anyone who says otherwise is almost certainly a PR flack for the rich.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that not all ambulance calls result in a hospital stay and that not all patients staying at a hospital arrived in an ambulance? Comparing ambulance calls and hospital stays is an apple and oranges comparison.

    8. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by harlequinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The full population rate includes the Tesla employees. The only at Tesla rate does not. But you would need to establish a link between their callouts from home and their work at Tesla for that to be useful information e.g. as a condition caused by their work.

      But lets extrapolate. Lets say that they call the amulance at home at the same rate they do at work (unlikely since they aren't working anymore and have been removed from the alleged source of their morbidity). From an 8 hour work day we can triple the amount of callouts to 300 and keep the population the same at 10000. So now we're at 8.8 per 1000 people per year. That's still 10x better than the general population.

    9. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your employees demand too much from you you shut down and go where they won't. Competition, bitch!

    10. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by boa · · Score: 1

      You keep comparing apples and oranges. Genpop includes lots of non-working people which I assume calls ambulances a lot, e.g. senior citizens. I'm just guessing here, but OD junkies and crime victims may also be major sources of ambulance dispatches. Isn't it more correct to compare Tesla workers with similar groups of people, not genpop?

    11. Re:And this is why labor unions are still a thing by harlequinn · · Score: 1

      "You keep comparing"

      Do I now? Solandri made the original comparison.

      He excluded old and young people - only including 18 to 65 year old people (working age).

  9. Don't tell me about the pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show me the baby!

  10. FUCK MUSK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DEATH TO TESLA

  11. Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick latest successful company and run clickbait article about how bad conditions. They do this time and time again with every successful company, yet their brainless readers just keep clicking.

    A good question would be, what is Tesla's labour turnover rate? If they're losing a large chunk of their workforce every year, then clearly conditions are very bad. If they're retaining most of their employees, then the employees are largely satisfied and the article is exaggerated bullshit.

    The summary mentions nothing about labour turnover. Does the article itself (I never read clickbait so I don't know)?

    1. Re:Typical Guardian by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Employee turnover isn't a good metric, because external economic conditions influence it. Otherwise you are claiming that nobody could be treated as a slave when there are no jobs, when reality and history directly contradicts that.

    2. Re: Typical Guardian by Entrope · · Score: 1

      External environmental and social factors also influence how many job-site injuries occur. By your logic, number of ambulance calls is also a bad metric by which to judge how this factory's workers are treated.

    3. Re: Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot

    4. Re: Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is not a successful company. They are haemorrhaging money and they do not haveâ a realistic path towards profitability.

    5. Re:Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employee turnover isn't a good metric, because external economic conditions influence it.

      Fair enough. Compare employee turnover at a company to employee turnover at comparable companies.

    6. Re: Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obamacare?

      Tesla's electric ambulances?

    7. Re: Typical Guardian by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      How do you expect a company to not be haemorrhaging money, when they're ramping up to be able to make 500000 cars in 2018?

    8. Re: Typical Guardian by haruchai · · Score: 1

      How do you expect a company to not be haemorrhaging money, when they're ramping up to be able to make 500000 cars in 2018?

      The problem is if they can realistically recoup those losses and turn them into profits within the next few years.
      If they're not at least breaking even by the time they clear the backlog of Model 3 reservations, I don't see how they'll survive

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re: Typical Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, they will not be able to make 500000 cars or anywhere close to that number in 2018. Even if they somehow manage to build that capacity within, their environmental permits don't allow it. Secondly, it would help a lot if they made a profit on the very expensive cars they sell right now. The problem is not the investments (which are small compared to other car manufacturers), but the fact that they would lose money even without those investments. If they cannot make money on the Model S, how would they ever make anything selling Model 3s at the prices they are currently proposing? Meanwhile, the Model S is getting old, they still haven't fixed many of the quality problems and if the Model 3 actually goes on sale some day, the Model S becomes very unattractive, even for Tesla fans. And then there is the problem that several companies who actually know how to build a car will have multiple long-range EVs to choose from by the time, if ever, the Model S arrives in meaningful numbers.

      I just don't see Tesla surviving without many, many billions of gullible stock buyer money. The best case scenario for Tesla is that an established car manufacturer buys them once the stock has settles to a more realistic value and integrates Tesla into their own model range.

  12. Long Hours by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked in an Aircraft Depot for the F15 Fighter as a civilian. Many times during periods like the Gulf Wars we would often work 12 hour shifts 7 days a week. They usually tried to limit that to 2 or 3 weeks because eventually it took a toll on people. After two weeks it's like time starts to blur. You make more mistakes and people get very stressed. Several times people almost came to blows on the job. I remember one guy walking down the back of a fighter and he stepped over an air duct and almost went off the side to the concrete floor. I watched helpless as another guy reached up and grabbed his shirt and snatched him back. We all felt energized by the emergency and the overtime was great but I was glad for some time off. Damn I wish I was 30 again. 100 degree summer heat in a hanger climbing over and inside jets. It would kill me now.

    1. Re:Long Hours by Nutria · · Score: 1

      How many seizures did that overwork cause?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Long Hours by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      One guy ALMOST fell off of a plane.

    3. Re:Long Hours by Nutria · · Score: 1

      That's not what I asked.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:Long Hours by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A plane!

    5. Re:Long Hours by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      We had a few guys get heat stroke. One of the older guys had a heart attack and had to be hauled out in an ambulance. Several accidents with injuries and lots of close calls. Working that hard for that many hours will cause mistakes.

    6. Re:Long Hours by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Yep, they didn't have fall protection around them back in the 90s. Osha came in after 2000 and started wearing them out. Lots of changes.

    7. Re:Long Hours by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      They just did it as an emergency effort to get some aircraft that were near completion of modifications back to their units. After that we scaled back. If it had continued I'm pretty sure there would have been some really bad stuff. Working around a weapon system that has 3000 psi hydraulics and lots of moving parts to be operational checked. I actually saw one worker get caught in a landing gear door once during a period of long hours. They couldn't get the door to close and she noticed that a connector was loose in the wheel well. Without thinking she reached inside to connect it and "wham" it closed on her. She had half her body in there and it didn't go over center on the cam or she'd have gotten fully crushed. As it was she had permanent damage and was lucky to live. We had another guy fall off a jet but I wasn't there for that. He landed on some tool boxes and he never came back to work. He had only worked there a few months and I hardly knew him. It's an industrial environment much like a manufacturing environment in many ways. I'm sure if Tesla is straining that hard it's taking it's toll on their workers the same way. People will make mistakes and get hurt. Still and all, I loved my job. I'm retired now and I'm going to have to find something to do. My wife is working me to death. :)

    8. Re:Long Hours by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I had a T-shirt that said F15s were fighter aircraft and everything else was just a target.

    9. Re:Long Hours by merlock · · Score: 1

      They just did it as an emergency effort to get some aircraft that were near completion of modifications back to their units. After that we scaled back. If it had continued I'm pretty sure there would have been some really bad stuff. Working around a weapon system that has 3000 psi hydraulics and lots of moving parts to be operational checked. I actually saw one worker get caught in a landing gear door once during a period of long hours. They couldn't get the door to close and she noticed that a connector was loose in the wheel well. Without thinking she reached inside to connect it and "wham" it closed on her. She had half her body in there and it didn't go over center on the cam or she'd have gotten fully crushed. As it was she had permanent damage and was lucky to live. We had another guy fall off a jet but I wasn't there for that. He landed on some tool boxes and he never came back to work. He had only worked there a few months and I hardly knew him. It's an industrial environment much like a manufacturing environment in many ways. I'm sure if Tesla is straining that hard it's taking it's toll on their workers the same way. People will make mistakes and get hurt. Still and all, I loved my job. I'm retired now and I'm going to have to find something to do. My wife is working me to death. :)

      I worked there for 18 months (pre Gulf War 1). I had moved to the avionics complex by that time, and had heard of (and knew) the lady that got caught in the landing gear door (wasn't it the MLG door?). Not to speak ill, but I never considered her to be one of the brightest bulbs in the string. I also remember hearing about the idiot who was using the weight-on-wheels (WOW) override while doing ops checks and radiated the hanger for over 5 minutes.

  13. Sounds like they need a Union by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Troll

    Which is why the workers at all the auto plants are in unions.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Sounds like they need a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but I wouldn't base an assertion off a factually light summary and article. How does Tesla's safety record compare and trend to other automotive manufacturers? A former corporate office I was in had ~150 employees and averaged 2 ambulance visits per year for dizziness, faintness,etc. Tesla employs 10,000 and has averaged 30 ambulance visits per year. Obviously the corporate office I was at needed a union...

      Maybe Tesla has a relatively good safety record, maybe not. The article doesn't tell me one way or the other.

    2. Re:Sounds like they need a Union by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Who do you think wrote and funded the story?

    3. Re: Sounds like they need a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most countries, workers can decide individually whether they want to join a union and if so, which.

    4. Re: Sounds like they need a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Guardian.

  14. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Jzanu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Read that again. 200 times for dizziness and nausia, etc. those things typically coming from environmental exposure to toxins and poorly ventilated chemical vapors. Hundreds more for physical medical problems coming from manufacturing work. If you are to compare numbers on a population and activity basis, make sure you understand what they include first. Compare that number not just to civil population in various work, but to the industry cohort. That's what courts do to find managerial negligence, and may be required here.

  15. And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People don't want cars that take hours to refill. Stopping for gas is a pain in the ass, and it's quick. It's why hybrid gas sell better. How about swappable batteries standardized for all cars? These folks are sweating for something that won't fly.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by scourfish · · Score: 1

      It seems like the range on the cars is such that in most cases, people can charge their cars when they get home from work. And for long trips, where it might take an hour to charge the battery every 200 to 300 miles, I personally wouldn't mind stopping for an hour, grabbing a bite to eat, and relaxing.

    2. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      theshowmecanuck doesn't want cars that take minutes to refill.

      FTFY.

      You are showing your own ignorance and biases about EVs. Nothing more.

      Stopping for gas is a pain in the ass, and it's quick

      Plugging your car in at home and allowing it to charge overnight avoids all those annoying trips to the gas station.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I personally wouldn't mind stopping for an hour, grabbing a bite to eat, and relaxing

      Unfortunately most of the working population doesn't have hours of free time to spare on doing nothing at some charging station.

    4. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No, you are showing your ignorance what is wanted in the real world. Recharging a car in under 15 minutes is what is wanted, and there are fast charging systems being developed that can do that. No one wants to wait for more than an hour when taking a long trip or driving more than 200 miles in a day to recharge.

    5. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you are showing your ignorance what is wanted in the real world.

      So my driveway isn't "the real world"? When I park my electric vehicle and charge it overnight, does it transport itself to an alternative universe? Another reality?

      I live with an electric vehicle. I suspect I know a lot more than you do about what's realistic.

      Those long trips? They are the exception and, as you pointed out, even faster charging is coming soon.

      Today, if you have a Tesla, you probably only need to wait about 30 minutes, and that wait can be while you eat or get a coffee. It's not like filling with gas where you have to stand by the vehicle while it is charging. Remember that you just spent 3-4 hours driving, so you probably need a break anyway.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the time I'm driving short trips like to or from work. I can rent a gas car for any longer trips. I don't think the average driver is any different. Hybrid cars sell better since charging stations aren't common.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    7. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What the fuck. This PC I am typing on can't be taken with me!
      It's this big box under my desk with all these drives and memory and cards and stuff.
      It's obviously worthless.

      Also, the house I live in is actually ATTACHED TO THE GROUND.. It's like there are these cement rooms below ground, and the house is nailed or bolted to it. I can't take my house with me across country..
      Obviously my house is a pile of shit.

      And I got this thing called an ipad.. I'm planning on living in a hut in the wilderness of Alaska for a while. Now I find out that the Ipad will only last like 8 hours of usage before charging... I need it to last at least 4 months on a charge... What a juky shit slab the ipad is.

        You see... your use case is not the one the Tesla is for.
      You are making up a use case that MOST PEOPLE don't have.
      "On average, Americans drive 29.2 miles per day,"
      http://newsroom.aaa.com/2015/04/new-study-reveals-much-motorists-drive/

      The use case for Tesla is the 90% of people who drive less than 200 miles a day 99% of the time.
      For example, in the last 5 years I have NEVER driven more than 200 miles in a day. No kidding.
      And I live 'in the sticks'.. I have to drive 40 miles to get to a good hospital. And my work is 20 miles away from home. My parents are 60 miles away. I STILL drive less than 200 miles in a day.

    8. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget how long ACTUALLY gassing up can take.
      Sure, the tank itself is full in 5 minutes or less, but then you have to go in and wait in line because the card reader on the pumps is broken. Then you have some bum hanging around hassling people you need to avoid.
      Sometimes the pumps are broken!
      Or maybe you get robbed?
      Then you have to go down and get a couple of stitches at the hospital.
      Spend an hour or two filling out insurance forms.
      Then down to the station to file a report.. Wait for a line-up, give another statement to another office because the first went off duty...
      And on your way back to the station to get your car you are run over by a truck.
      So it REALLY takes like 100 hours to gas up.
      Regardless, I don't like the smell of gas. Gas cars are garbage unless you can fill them telepathically (or is that telekinesisy) with rose water.

      See that?
      Two can play the unrealistic expectations crazy card.

         

    9. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Not only "probably need a break", but should take a break (whether they "need" one or not). Long periods of driving without breaks are not safe. Your attention begins to wane. There's a reason why truck drivers are mandated to take periodic breaks.

      If everyone had to stop for half an hour or so every several hundred kilometers, the highways would be a lot safer place; it's almost unfortunate that ranges keep improving, in that regard ;). But most people prefer to push themselves rather than stop.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    10. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      It's very unsafe to continue driving more than a couple hours without a break. If you don't have time to drive there safely, you shouldn't be driving there at all -- it's not just you who you could kill, it's innocent people in another car.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, it's the car doing the driving.

    12. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      People don't want cars that take hours to refill. Stopping for gas is a pain in the ass, and it's quick. It's why hybrid gas sell better. How about swappable batteries standardized for all cars? These folks are sweating for something that won't fly.

      Most cars don't actually go very far very often, I'd say almost every destination I go to by car is within ~100 miles. If it's further then it's often much further and I'd rather fly and use a taxi/rental. If you're drive long distances regularly then it's simply not the car for you. The problem with EVs is that when you're out of range and out of fast charging options you're really stuck. So what you mainly need are more charging stations so the worst that'll happen is a top-up at a 50+ kWh charging station, 90 miles in 30 minutes is tolerable if it's only occasionally. It's being unwillingly stuck for 3 hours on a slow charger because the quick one was out of order that is the killer.

      Hybrids can be a decent alternative, but they have a problem creating good incentives. At least here in Norway cars with a small range extender get harshly penalized as not pure EVs, while certain hybrids that'll barely pull out of the driveway without running on gas get huge tax breaks for being part electric. The Chevy Volt (2017) actually looks pretty nice, 53 miles electric and 420 mile range. When you know it can be topped up with 350+ miles of gas any time you need it range isn't an issue, while 53 miles is more than the average daily commute. Haven't seen that one launched in Norway yet, only the Bolt as Opel Ampera-e.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Even if you only go on one 500 to 1000 km trip a year you are screwed because you will spend so much of your time charging. I do a 500 km trip every couple of months (close to 1000 km round trip). And usually I am doing it over a long weekend. I can't afford a couple of hours to recharge in the middle. In Canada many people do trips like that on a long weekend. In the comments here I see a lot of people who only want to look at the 'normal' use case. Life has a lot of edge cases. If people here really code, they must be shit because their work probably falls over at every edge case since they only care about the happy path. I agree the Volt looks OK. But I live in Canada and drive in the mountains. At 20 below zero C or more the battery dies way faster. And this is a problem for all battery powered cars; they are only tested on hot desert test tracks in the USA. And then never mind the steep mountain grades that totally saps that tiny engine pushing a heavy battery. And all the electric cars are generally priced starting the same as low end luxury gas powered cars. When I can swap out a battery in 5 minutes, I'll look at electric.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    14. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound rich.

    15. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by archer,+the · · Score: 1

      Then yes, you and other frequent long range drivers probably shouldn't get a fully electric vehicle in the near future. But before you apply your statement to everyone, you need to determine what population are frequent long range drivers. If it's 100%, then yes, EVs aren't ready yet. From what I see of friends' and coworkers' travel habits, I'd be surprised if frequent long range drivers accounted for more than 20% of the population. Which leaves a big market for EVs. You would also need to apply similar logic for the number of people in Canada. It's not the only country with people using cars...

    16. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The charge circuits in modern cars (80kW at 3 miles per kW; my Volt gets 3.5-4.2 miles per kW) can put 240 miles of range on in an hour. At 4 miles per kW, it's 320 miles. Modern chargers can push 130kW or higher, and a 120kW charge circuit in a car could put 300 miles on in 50 minutes.

      Charge times of half an hour per 200 miles are viable because it's about 3 hours of driving at 66mph average.

    17. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The 1000km round trip means you reach your destination just outside the 482km range of the Chevy Bolt. You need about a 2.67 minute charge on an 80kW DC circuit to get that last bit in. At the end of your drive, you can plug in and have a full charge in 1.25 hours.

      ChargePoint currently sells charge circuits capable of delivering 130kW DC charging and up (as high as nearly 700kW). A future electric car with a 120kW charging circuit or support for off-board charging circuits (as in the Zero Motorcycle, which has a 1.65kW onboard circuit and accepts up to 6.6kW through a tree of offboard chargers) could get that 300 miles in 50 minutes. The J1772 standard communicates with the BMS, so the BMS can operate the TMS and work with the charger to maintain battery temperature range if the power can get to the battery; this may involve the cooling system working to almost-keep-up, then the BMS dialing the charge rate back so the cooling system can run the temperature back down to the bottom of the optimal range.

      On current hardware, a 500km trip at average 90km/h should take you 5.56 hours. You should eat and rest every 4 hours. Plug into an 80kW charge circuit and you can put another 96km back onto your car, giving you a total 578km of range for the trip, allowing you to limp that last bit in. You'll then need about an hour at your destination to fully-recharge your car.

      If you're making an 11-hour round trip, an hour at the destination doesn't seem excessive. If you're just going to pick up a package, pay Fedex to do it.

    18. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And I can put 400 miles of range in my car in a few minutes. This is enough time to pop into the attached store and pick up something that's probably unhealthy, and switch drivers (I've never gone that far by myself). I've driven six hours between lunch and dinner more than once (well, me and the other drivers), and if I had to stop to let the car recharge for an hour I wouldn't be able to do that as conveniently.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes but marathon trips with two drivers are the same kind of ludicrous nonsense as hypermiling: an edge case nobody cares about, except for some 1 in 100,000 people who lead such a sad and pathetic life that that's a thing they do.

    20. Re: And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a dumb thing to say and you're a dumb person for saying it.

      People drive hundreds of kilometers at a stretch every day. It's basically required in some parts of the world -- if you stop for half an hour every 2 hours, some day trips suddenly become impossible.

      Given the driving I've done in my life in some remote places, doing that would effectively be a prison sentence -- you'd be trapped, unable to leave town.

      This ridiculous argument comes up every time the limited range of electric vehicles comes up, and it's wrong every time it is brought up.

      The most wrong part of it is that putting your fingers in your ears and pretending people travel like that and people who don't should just change, practicality be damned actively turns people off of electric vehicles, and that kind of thinking could push manufacturers to ignore real problems with their vehicles because their echo chamber doesn't tell them there are problems.

    21. Re: And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! I'll tell all the people living in remote places that they're all ridiculous and they should just never leave town.

      Sorry, ridiculous fools! You wanted to visit your family and it can't be done in a charge cycle? You're nothing but an idiot!!!

    22. Re: And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's asinine.

      "People are stupid, they shouldn't even want range. Who cares if they have reasons like visiting family in a limited amount of time off, or living in remote places? Fuck those pathetic fools and their practical needs."

    23. Re: And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, I think EVs could work great if they're much cheaper.

      Locally, EVs are hitting the used market for about $10k. I'm willing to buy a range limited EV for $10k. I'm most definitely NOT willing to buy a car that doesn't do absolutely everything I need for $50k or $100k.

      Hell, I wouldn't buy a car that *does* do everything I need for that much. It's a car, not a house.

    24. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no, your tiny little bit of the world doesn't represent the whole. don't project your needs onto someone else.

    25. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      When I'm on a road trip, it's almost always with my wife or some friends. I don't live such a sad and pathetic life that I have to drive hundreds of miles by myself.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:And rechargable cars won't work anyway. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I've been on road trips with my parents. We stopped for half-hour breaks between here and the next state. Staying locked up in the car for 9 hours is not the kind of thing most people want to do.

      Likewise, it's still a thing nobody does every other weekend unless there's something psychiatrically wrong with them.

  16. Just goes to show that management is by H3lldr0p · · Score: 1

    another skill that's also part talent. Only in this case the talent portion seems to be taken up with the ability for public performance and not so much with the ability to manage.

    Look, common suffering only goes so far when you don't do anything to alleviate the conditions which lead to the suffering. So sleeping on the concrete is easily seen as nothing but a show for the workers not solidarity with them. Solidarity with them would to open examine why they're having to work so many extra hours and to find some way to reduce them. But I'm willing to bet that solution would have been along the lines of reducing hours which would have put the factory behind the artificial targets that were arrived at in order to influence the market-makers on Wall Street. And we can't disappoint Wall Street now can we?

    For as much as a maverick Musk puts himself out there as, he sure is as tied to the hip to Wall Street as everyone else is these days. If he was actually interested in making his worker's lives better he'd be the first one to proclaim that the quality of the work is far important than the number of hours dedicated to it.

    1. Re:Just goes to show that management is by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Solidarity with them would to open examine why they're having to work so many extra hours and to find some way to reduce them

      Solidarity demonstrates that if there was a way to get himself off of the concrete floor he would be doing that thing. Solidarity is like dog-fooding your software, it means you have a vested interest in making it work because it's not an abstract problem, it's a problem you yourself face.

  17. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, we've had ambulances called to the office complex that I work from probably three times in the last year. If I look at the map of the parking lot there are about 400 numbered parking spaces, so assuming that some workers carpool or use some other form of transportation I'd guess there are around 450 employees.

    So, for my workplace for one year is 3/450 = .667%

    By contrast Tesla's workplace with your numbers is (120/3.5)/10000 = .343%

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  18. i know people who worked in an old vehicle factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the stories are much, much worse than tesla.

  19. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "For 2009, there were an estimated 36,698,670 EMS events (responses) in the U.S., resulting in approximately 28,004,624 transports."

    http://www.jems.com/articles/2011/11/nasemso-survey-provides-snapshot-ems-ind.html

    Around 871 / 10,000 people / year. Assuming they are there only 1/3 of the time and that calls are evenly distributed throughout the day that would be about 290 / 10,000 ppl / year

  20. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Nutria · · Score: 1

    10^348 is larger than 100, but when people read "more than 100", it's designed to make people think "a little more than 100". If The Guardian meant 500, they should have written it.

    That's still a rate of 0.017 ambulance calls per worker per year, which isn't much, compared to how many times that ambulances get called in cities of 10,000.

    Did TFA compare that to GM, Ford & Chrysler?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  21. How It's Made . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . did a segment on Tesla a few years ago. Looked very laid back - not like this claim at all. No grease monkeys, clean uniforms (uh, maybe that's a clue it was staged?), and every was spotless.

    Not the Dream Cars branch, but the regular How It's Made.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  22. This message brought to you by... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    ...UAW

  23. Re:i know people who worked in an old vehicle fact by grungeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I actually did work at an old economy factory producing cars in the medium price range. Never heard any stories compared to Tesla. But the unions were strong at our company, maybe that's why.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  24. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This requires cities to be called into action and OSHA inspections. Tesla specifically opened its plants in the locations they're at now because of the known lack of local inspections or inspectors that are complete idiots that sign everything off. Believe me, companies actually look for places like this, because they think inspections are a waste of time and it allows them to hire the cheapest lousiest contractor to do the job. This situation is going to go beyond Tesla and hit the city as well for being negligent on inspections. The whole Oakland warehouse fire already has every jurisdiction freaking out.

    I quite despise companies that do this and also despise the cities for allowing this crap to continue. I do work for FM and constantly see this nonsense go on in many facilities around the country. Then when something happens, they call us and hope that the insurers will pay, if not, they threaten to sue everyone. Plants that constantly have the same accidents over and over and they are still allowed to operate with the same problems, because OSHA gives them leeway or they find some lousier insurance company that will still insure them.

  25. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    I couldn't get numbers just on workers, but I did find that in 2009 there were 28,004,624 medical transports resulting from 911 calls. Population that year was 306,800,000. That's one medical transport per year per 11 people.

    120 transports in 3.5 years for 10,000 people is one transport per 23 people.

    While workers are more healthy than the average person, they're also a lot more likely to accept a medical transport for things like dizziness where a person at home would likely just stop painting for the day and get some fresh air.

    In the 90s I worked at a plywood mill, and we did have a lot less transports than that, but we also didn't call medics for things like dizziness. I had a head injury with lots of blood, enough blood that some of co-workers were freaked out, and I didn't get transported. I stopped the bleeding with a paper towel, and they checked my eyes for signs of concussion, and let me go back to work with the instructions to call if I started acting "weird." From the sounds of it they bought fancy insurance that includes medical transport and they just transport anybody with a problem.

  26. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    If you can find numbers that specific please do provide them. In my experience it is hard to get public numbers that specific; managers that need those numbers pay consultants for them!

  27. Yet another hit-piece on Musk by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a few years I was annoyed about the uniform adoration Mr. Musk was getting on Slashdot and in other circles. Then hit-pieces like this one started appearing...

    Would the insufferable conditions described in TFA have been described at all — or described using the same terms — if he were still the Progressives' darling for championing "green" causes?

    Or has the tone switched, because Musk is a Trump-administration supporter (sort of) — and there is a well-organized smear and boycott campaign against him as a result?

    There is a lively discussion on whether or not Musk is a "Trump enabler" — but people, who've already concluded, that he is, will stop at, literally, nothing. Even poisoning the "haters" is becoming a thing — online smears are child's play...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or has the tone switched, because Musk is a Trump-administration supporter (sort of) — and there is a well-organized smear and boycott campaign against him as a result?

      Anyone who thinks the tone switched only recently hasn't been paying attention. People started grousing about Musk long before "The Donald" became a serious presidential contender.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by mi · · Score: 1

      How do you know that? I, for example, have always been skeptical about him — certainly others have been too. Do you have examples of the same people and/or organizations changing their mind about Musk before he indicated his lack of pure hate for Trump?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk is bad at diverse activity because people are bad at it. That isn't a pass, just a reminder. Otherwise, you are an insufferable fucking retard!

    4. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Musk's reality distortion field is just fading because we're getting used to his companies doing things thought impossible, and it usually takes a few years for the skeletons of how he achieves that to come out of the closet. Rumblings of not-so-good working conditions at SpaceX and Tesla predate the election cycle.

      Correlation is not causation, and all that.

    5. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long before "The Donald" became a serious presidential contender.

      Did he ever?

    6. Re:Yet another hit-piece on Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Some guy claims poisoning "confirmed by a lab test" but does not share what he was supposedly poisoned with. He also does not share any copy of such a lab test. He says he contacted the police but they have not arrested anyone. He first makes claims of leftists poisoning him by mentioning someone shaking his hand, then says that one young man was likely the supposed poisoner and describes the young man without sharing any evidence the person he kind of accuses is actually a "leftist", just that Iceland is "full of leftists." Then in the end he uses the phrase "if it was him." Umm ok.

      So from that ridiculously irresponsible blog presentation you assert that poisoning has become a thing. You left out one of the descriptors that people use to describe Trump supporters. Loons.

  28. this is musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ALL his companies are run like this. Space-x is known for grinding people 60-80 hours a week as the expected minimum, salary or not. and if you don't then you won't have a job for long. To him people are an expendable resource to be burned out and tossed aside.. I for one would never work for Elon.

  29. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    My company HQ with around 1700 people has around one ambulance call per year, and that is all desk jobs.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  30. Always Accepting Alliterative Association by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Manager Musk Must Mean More Money!

    1. Re:Always Accepting Alliterative Association by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Being aliterate is bad enough, but confusing it with alliteration is illiterate.

  31. Some perspective for our non US members... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

    No doubt there will be plenty of comments about "stopping for an hour to charge on a long trip is OK" I could be wrong, but I suspect these may come from European posters. "Long trip" doesn't have quite the same meaning here. I can drive from Dallas to El Paso in about 9 hours with no stops and STILL be in Texas. That's Paris to Berlin distance (640 miles or so). In reality, there will be bathroom breaks, at least one meal, so add another 2 hours. Now, add two hours for recharge stops, assuming you can find one in the wasteland of west Texas. It adds up. I drove to Tucson Arizona a few years ago and El Paso was only HALF WAY there. I assure you even gas stations were scarce between El Paso and Tucson.

    1. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can drive from Dallas to El Paso in about 9 hours

      Why would you do that, considering that pneumatics (rubber tyres) wear out very quickly and you can't do anything meaningful while driving? Besides airplanes, Europe uses trains extensively, since steel wheels on steel rails last a long time and the traction can be easily electrified and run off hydro dams or nuke plants essentially for free, while pax peck their laptops, smartphones or books. It doesn't make sense to bridal carry your car coast-to-coast when you can easily rent one for the "last mile" if needed.

      E.g. Italy has more motorized vehicles per capita than USA or Germany, but the trains of Ferrovio dello Stato are always full of people, since italians dislike driving long distances, as the traffic attitudes differ very much from north to south, from Milan to Rome, onto Naples and Sicily, especially the interpretation of red light as a command, advice or just discotheque decoration... Anyhow, USA really and urgently needs to invest in HST!

    2. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      In reality, there will be bathroom breaks, at least one meal, so add another 2 hours. Now, add two hours for recharge stops

      Huh?

      So your conception is that you would drive for 9 hours and have two hours of stops.... but you would leave your vehicle unplugged during those stops? And then make two hours of charging stops, charging that you could have done during your already planned stop time?

      The thing that makes your conception especially puzzling to me is that people already combine "recharging" and break / meal stops when driving gasoline cars. If they pull off the highway to get a meal, they'll also tend to fill up, or vice versa, since they've already had to take an exit, drive into the nearest town, and stop. The only difference with an EV is that you leave the vehicle connected to the "pump" while you're eating.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    3. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      In reality, there will be bathroom breaks, at least one meal, so add another 2 hours. Now, add two hours for recharge stops...

      No. You're doing it wrong. The meal happens while you're charging. Especially since the Supercharger station is going to be literally next door to a restaurant. (It is in my town, right next to the interstate.) If you've got a family, bathroom breaks take 20 minutes easily, so again, stop at a Supercharger and plug in. 20 minutes from a Supercharger is quite a lot of energy. Do that twice in the day, on either side of lunch, and you're good. You're in El Paso, and probably still have a 30% charge. Really, it's not that hard. It's a minor adjustment to your habits, is all. Oh, and subtract the 20 minutes you would have spent stopping for gas at least once along the way. 30 minutes if you're the type who often goes into the convenience store. One of those longish bathroom breaks is a wash.

      The only people who lose real time trying to drive cross country in a Tesla are single men hard driving as fast as they can who never go into the convenience store for jerky when they stop for gas. Everybody else is going to spend maybe an extra 20 minutes somewhere, topping up charge before getting into the destination city. People with kids don't even notice the difference in time if they make any effort at all to have stops coincide with Supercharger locations, and that will get easier and easier as the year gets older, since Tesla continues to install them.

    4. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Why would you do that, considering that pneumatics (rubber tyres) wear out very quickly and you can't do anything meaningful while driving? Besides airplanes, Europe uses trains extensively, since steel wheels on steel rails last a long time and the traction can be easily electrified and run off hydro dams or nuke plants essentially for free, while pax peck their laptops, smartphones or books. It doesn't make sense to bridal carry your car coast-to-coast when you can easily rent one for the "last mile" if needed.

      We have trains where the population density is high enough to support their operation, such as on the east coast; even then many lose money. Air travel is much more popular for other trips since a train would take all day when a plane might only take a few hours.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Now, it is a problem because the infrastructure just isn't there. Eventually, even the long charge times become less important since you will charge while you are in the bathroom or eating.

    6. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      ALL passenger travel loses money: airlines, buses, trains, all of it. That is not a worthwhile measure. The fact is that it moves lots of people while reducing pollution, congestion on the roads, and allowing passengers a degree of freedom from concentrating on navigating themselves so they can sleep, read, tweet, on contribute to the hegemony that is Facebook.

      This is a very deep topic that goes beyond the scope of this discussion.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    7. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      Where are these chargers? I can't just whip out a bright orange extension cord and plug into any restaurant outlet. Now, I have to hope that anywhere along my route offers charging AND that they serve food. The infrastructure is not ready. Period. My main point is that the US has large swaths of relatively empty land where high volumes of traffic pass but where just finding gas is sometimes difficult because of the isolated area. You can forget about charging when you have signs that say "next gas 100 miles".

    8. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where are these chargers?

      Please tell me you know how to use Google. They're every ~100mi / 150km on almost every interstate in the US (more in more densely populated areas), and this is before the big planned expansion.

      Now, I have to hope that anywhere along my route offers charging AND that they serve food

      Where do you think that chargers are - in the middle of the woods? They're at highway exits, the same sorts of places you find gas stations and restaurants. Generally in the larger cities along the route, where such cities are present.

      Click on any charger on the above map. It'll tell you what restaurants (and other things) are around the charger.

      The infrastructure is not ready. Period.

      Learn to use Google. Period.

      Unless you're looking for a vehicle for, say, a trip deep into Canyonlands or the like, it's not a problem. If you're a normal human being who takes interstates to near their destination and then travels less than a couple hundred kilometers off of their turnoff to their destination, there is no problem.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    9. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      How closely spaced do chargers need to be before you'll admit that the infrastructure is "there"?

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    10. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great unless you arrive at the supercharger and find you've got to wait in line for two hours before you can even start to charge.

      If you really think about the infrastructure that's going to be needed to cope with peak travel times in our electric-vehicle future, it's really not going to suffice to replace pumps with supercharger stations one-to-one. We'll either need some kind of more careful orchestration (perhaps a reservation system), or else we'll need a much faster turnaround time (achievable with swappable battery packs). Otherwise, we'll need huge amounts of charging capacity that sits idle 90-99% of the time in order to avoid wait times of 6+ hours during times of peak demand.

    11. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Close enough that when it's getting low, I can just look for a place rather than needing to pull it up on Google. Preferably, enough that I can be confident I will find a place where I can eat while I recharge. For example, when I can see on the interstate, a sign showing the food options at the next exit and more than one has a charger emblem on it.

      That's not to say I wouldn't consider an electric as an in-town car until then.

    12. Re: Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how exactly does this relate to how Tesla treat their employees?

    13. Re: Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there's even any chargers in my whole State. If there are, they aren't even within range of my house. True, I don't have a Tesla nor do I have a problem with them. I just accept they are not yet ready for me, if I want to rely on charging from their chargers. I do, however, own quite a few shares.

    14. Re: Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Why "don't think that..."? Use the map. Just because you've never bothered to consult a map of where they are doesn't mean that they don't exist.

      You didn't list what state you're in, but the only state in the US that doesn't have any Tesla chargers is Alaska... and given that a lot of towns in Alaska don't even have roads to them and the population density is tiny, that's no shock. Of other states, North Dakota is probably the most deprived has no "superchargers", only two "destination chargers"; I-94 as it passes through North Dakota is the last sizeable chunk of US interstate to be upgraded, but it's next on the list. After North Dakota, the lowest number of superchargers per state is Rhode Island and Delaware (1) followed by Maine (2). They're all arranged along interstates, which is where you actually need them - an about 100 mi / 150 km apart, less in densely populated areas.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    15. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      You don't need to "pull it up on Google", the vehicle knows where all of them are. And it will tell you what restaurants are at each charger - and a lot more info (restrooms, wifi, amenities, etc). You don't have to wait to "see a sign on the interstate".

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    16. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by sjames · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing the point. Pointedly so.

    17. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the charging times sound so pleasant here in europe as well.

      Paris to Berlin isn't that uncommon a trip. Actually, let's take a common business trip I konw within germany: Hamburg to Munich, two of the largest cities in the country. 520 miles, roughly 7-8 hours to drive if you don't drive fast.

      Business travellers will like to take a well motorized car in order to cut the time it takes by an hour or two. The problem is: electric vehicles can't drive fast over large distances. So any time you cut by driving fast is compensated for by waiting to charge it.

      Furthermore, right now, customers of a car company here in Germany expect to be able to drive their car all the way to Spain, Italy, the UK, Scandinavia or the Balkans because Europe is big and virtually everyone has plenty of holidays. That gets us in exactly the same kind of trouble that you would have on your trip to Tucson.

      I would think electric vehicles actually make more sense for commuters in the large urban areas of the US, because the distance to other important places is so large there, and days you can take off from work so scarce, you'd take the plane anyhow.

    18. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      In reality, there will be bathroom breaks, at least one meal, so add another 2 hours. Now, add two hours for recharge stops, assuming you can find one in the wasteland of west Texas.

      Why aren't there 80kW chargers at your highway rest stops? You should be charging while you're peeing!

    19. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You know there was a time when cars ran on anything--alcohol or peanut oil--because gas stations weren't a thing? They got shit for mileage and horsepower, but they could burn anything you could dump in the tank.

    20. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      What is the point then? There's more than enough density to drive country on almost any interstate, and they're about to double the density. The car knows exactly where the stops are, will tell you (no need to "look for a sign"), and will tell you what restaurants and amenities are nearby. So what exactly is the problem?

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    21. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      What does crossing a border have to do with anything? Europeans don't bounce off their borders - they pass right through, and frequently go on long trips :) Texas being big isn't a shock to anyone, and has nothing to do with this discussion.

      One difference is they have decent train networks as a viable choice. Flying through Germany and France at 200MPH drinking beer is a pretty awesome experience.

    22. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by sjames · · Score: 1

      It is still necessary to plan the trip around the available chargers. One cannot simply stop along the way and drive around to see the sights for a bit without risk of not reaching the next charger. When there are enough that wherever you're going and whatever you're doing, there will be a charger, like there is with gas stations, then it will be sufficient.

    23. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      It is still necessary to plan the trip around the available chargers.

      No, it isn't. If you don't stop at one, you can stop at the next - you don't need to stop at every one, even with the shortest range Model S or Model 3. And you don't need to know where they are, unless you're driving on the one section of interstate in North Dakota that doesn't have them. Your car knows where they are. You don't need to "plan" anything at all.

      . One cannot simply stop along the way and drive around to see the sights for a bit without risk of not reaching the next charger

      Yes, you absolutely can, unless "see the sights" to you means "driving around for literally three hours nonstop and not stopping anywhere with a power socket during the period". And even if you did want to drive around aimlessly for hours in a particular location, it's difficult to find a place in the US apart from deep wilderness that's not near a supercharger that you could head off to for a fillup before returning to your aimless driving. There are a few places (North Dakota / northeastern Montana being the main one), but that's it.

      You are describing a situation that does not correspond to reality. By the way, is it even worth mentioning that we're only talking about Tesla supercharging stations here and not taking into account other charging stations (which Tesla vehicles can also use)?

      When there are enough that wherever you're going and whatever you're doing, there will be a charger, like there is with gas stations, then it will be sufficient.

      Then it is sufficient, outside of the most remote of wilderness areas, and the (soon to be remedied) North Dakota gap. Glad you're onboard. Unless your plan is to, say, drive Canyonlands in a family sedan?

      And this whole conversation is ridiculous anyway because it's built around the edge case (cross country trips) rather than daily driving. I guarantee you that if the situation were reversed, if people were used to EVs and someone suggested gasoline vehicles, Slashdotters would be laughing their arses off at the concept that anyone would tolerate having to go to a gas station once every week or two and stand outside in whatever weather filling up their car, rather than just plugging in at home and never having to think about how much "energy" their vehicle has during their everyday life.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    24. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      "edge case (cross country trips)"

      FOR YOU maybe. A lot of people do long drives regularly. Many more want to have the option without building their entire plan around charger locations. It must be wonderful to live in a perfect bubble where everything perfectly meets your use case, but you would be the exception. At any rate my original post was specifically about long trips, not daily driving. If I can't charge while I eat, then charging is most definitely time added to an already long trip.

      Also, after following your oft repeated suggestion to just google it, I found that a lot of these chargers along the interstates are at hotels. So, can I just pull up at one of these and charge without getting a room? For that matter, what about getting off the interstate? Now, you're mostly screwed. Road trips are not just about getting from A to B.

    25. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If I'm pulling off the highway for a meal, I drive to a gas station and refuel, and I drive to a restaurant and eat, not necessarily in that order. These don't have to be particularly close to each other. If the restaurant is a mile away from the gas station, who cares? With an electric, I have to eat somewhere in walking distance of the gas station. (Maybe easy walking distance, since not everyone I hang out with is fully mobile.)

      This is a false equivalence. Depending on the charging station(s) and restaurants, it may not be a big deal, but it's not the same thing.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      20-minute bathroom breaks? What do you feed your kids? Do you ever travel any distance with multiple adults? Half an hour to get gas and pick something up from the convenience store? How do you make it take that long?

      I don't live in a particularly large metro area, but I've driven north on Friday afternoons in the summer. The freeway gets packed. There's going to be plenty of cars that don't have the range to get to their destination, perhaps because they were used for commuting that day. Now, suppose I drive into a charging station and there's as many cars waiting as there are stations, and each car will be there for a minimum of twenty minutes. There's going to need to be a lot more charging stations than there are gas pumps.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re: Some perspective for our non US members... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My in-laws used to have a cabin that we'd go to frequently. The first hour was on the interstate. After that, it was about three and a half hours on lesser highways. Interstates do not take you everywhere people want to go.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Rei · · Score: 1

      FOR YOU maybe.

      Do you do cross country driving everyday? No? Then it's an edge case relative to everyday driving.

      A lot of people do long drives regularly.

      And congratulations, today's charging infrastructure plus 215-300mi EVs lets you do precisely that.

      . Many more want to have the option without building their entire plan around charger locations

      For the last bloody time, You Don't Have To Do That. They're located at regular intervals on every interstate except for a small, soon-to-be-remedied patch of one, and the vehicle knows where they all are and what's there.

      If I can't charge while I eat,

      Also for the last bloody time, you can. You can even pick out your restaurant from hundreds of miles away.

      Also, after following your oft repeated suggestion to just google it, I found that a lot of these chargers along the interstates are at hotels.

      Without being able to see your screen, that's either a Google fail or a reading fail.

      Here is the Tesla supercharger map. Note. That is just Tesla superchargers, not all Tesla chargers, let alone all chargers period. Of the Tesla superchargers, most are either at shopping centres, restaurants, or travel stops. Some are at hotels, but a significant minority. All of these are public chargers - every last thing on that map. And they're as close to the interstates as gas stations are. I assume you know how to use the zoom button? Why on Earth didn't you use it and answer your own question?

      And seriously, you honestly wrote that many posts about there not being enough chargers without having ever bothered to see how many chargers there actually are? What the hell is wrong with you?

      This conversation ends here. I have no interest in debating with someone who is going to write half a dozen adamant posts about something before they actually even attempt to look it up for the first time.

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
    29. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Since this thread was about longer trips, and I already indicated electric is practical for around town, it's odd you're complaining about longer trips being an edge case.

      I'm guessing you prefer the interstates over the 'scenic routes' where there aren't so many superchargers.

    30. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you manage to simultaneously be wrong *and* an ass about it.

      Look a the route he proposed: Dallas to Tucson, through El Paso. Now, he's probably fine from Dallas to El Paso, with charging stations in Cisco, Sweetwater, and Midland. He's fine if he stays on the interstate, with stations in Van Horn and El Paso, but he's screwed if he has family to visit in, say, Carlsbad. And he's completely out of luck beyond El Paso -- his car will die somewhere in eastern AZ.

      But, hey, he should just learn to use Google! That will charge his car in the middle of the desert. Did you miss the part where he talked about driving in remote, thinly-populated areas?

      For another fail route, look at Minneapols to St. Louis.

      A normal route is south on I-35, then exit as Mason City, taking state highways through Cedar Rapids down to Hannibal and then St. Louis.

      With a Tesla, I'll stop in Albert Lea and recharge. Okay, fine. There's another station near Iowa City. But it looks like it's *just* out of range for a 60 kWh model S. Maybe if I get out and push I can get it to the charging station...

      Then there's nothing at all between Coralville and St. Louis. That's well out of range (260 miles).

      If you have the more expensive 85 kWh battery, you might be able to make it, but again that's really close.

      As I'm looking up these routes, what stands out to me is that trips like these are easily doable *if* I plan my route carefully. Gone are the days when I could simply hop in the car and start driving, knowing that I'll have *options* to stop every 20 miles or so.

    31. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      20-minute bathroom breaks? What do you feed your kids?

      It takes longer than you think. Really. Highway rest stops are where you're most likely to hit 20 minutes, since just walking back and forth between the building and the parking spot can take upwards of 5 minutes for a toddler. But even gas station stops require you to walk through the entire depth of the store and back again. (Not like the old days, with an exterior door directly into the bathroom.)

      Half an hour to get gas and pick something up from the convenience store? How do you make it take that long?

      15 minutes to pump gas, 5 minutes browsing, 10 minutes standing in line while grandpa up front counts out pennies so he can pay in cash and so Bluto next in line can buy lottery tickets and Wheezy next in line can buy cigarettes.... I rarely if ever go inside, since I'm not a convenience store guy, but when the pump can't give me a receipt, I go in, and invariably it takes 10 minutes in line while people dick around.

      I don't live in a particularly large metro area, but I've driven north on Friday afternoons in the summer. The freeway gets packed. There's going to be plenty of cars that don't have the range to get to their destination, perhaps because they were used for commuting that day.

      You misunderstand how electric cars work. The vast majority of their power usage is motive power. When they're not moving (stuck in traffic), they're expending no power for that at all. When they're in stop and go traffic, they're scavenging power from regenerative braking every time they stop, plus they're suffering basically no wind resistance. Electric cars tolerate traffic jams exceedingly well in terms of mileage. They don't even overheat.

      And who leaves on a road trip after commuting home? Not many people. Certainly not many with families. But even if they do, they're plugging their car in when they get home, and the recommended 220v garage chargers can top up the commute consumption in an hour. If the homeowner sprang for some Powerwall2 modules, it acts like a Supercharger, charging at 400 volts. So go home, eat dinner, pack the car, and you're ready. Really, it's not as much of a strain as you think.

    32. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      If you really think about the infrastructure that's going to be needed to cope with peak travel times in our electric-vehicle future, it's really not going to suffice to replace pumps with supercharger stations one-to-one.

      Well no. But there will be dramatically more chargers than that, since every single garage and most of the car ports will have one, if not two. It's not like gasoline, where installing your own tank requires either a farm waiver or an EPA approval, and is never legal inside city limits. Odds are, your garage already has an electrical outlet that would suffice for commuter charging (110V 15A) and odds are if you can afford a Tesla, you can afford to have an electrician add a 220V 40A breaker and outlet to your garage.

    33. Re:Some perspective for our non US members... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that vehicles are standing still on the way north, although I've seen that happen, as that there's lots of them. If even a small percentage were low on charge, for whatever reason, the lines for chargers would be pretty long.

      I may well have been overgeneralizing from one example, but we used to go on road trips almost immediately on getting home. Throw stuff into the back and go. Leave the interstate after about an hour and spend the next three and a half on increasingly insignificant roads.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  32. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "to make it the most painful thing possible. I knew people were having a hard time, working long hours, and on hard jobs. I wanted to work harder than they did, to put even more hours in," he was quoted as saying. "Because that's what I think a manager should do."

    Sure, that is how it works. Instead of organizing stuff, manager is supposed to be uncomfortable. Because what helps the employees the most is nice feeling related to managers sleeping habits.

    Otherwise said, you are no father to your children and your wife is about to divorce you, but hey, manager sleeps in a bad. That should help you.

    1. Re:ugh by Rei · · Score: 1

      So your conception is that because Musk wants to set an example for his employees and show that he's not "better than them", that means that during his waking hours he's not "organizing stuff"? What's he doing instead, playing Starcraft?

      --
      You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
  33. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >...from the normal number of times that people in a modest sized city...

    A city will have every age, health condition, and demographic within it.
    A factory or business will have healthy employable people within a certain hirable age range.

    So no there is no comparison. Unless the factory employees also include elderly folks with oxygen tanks & Alzheimer's wandering the production floor, in addition to curious children poking around the offices & assembly line, oh and don't forget the average thirty year old who's texting & driving their forklift as if they're in a city car, and last but not least- the occasional transient who's skitzed out on something and needing medical attention while they took a break from working the company cafe. Then you can match true comparisons.

  34. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Altus · · Score: 1

    My guess from the descriptions is that most of these people were suffering panic attacks... thats a lot of panic attacks for a workplace.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  35. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Altus · · Score: 1

    True, but there probably aren't a bunch of pensioners working at tesla, you would want to look at the number of transports of people within a reasonable working age range.

    Also you want to eliminate hospital to hospital transfers which may or may not be in your original data set.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  36. Re:i know people who worked in an old vehicle fact by catchblue22 · · Score: 2

    This sudden media push against Tesla couldn't be part of a United Autoworker's Propaganda campaign to unionize Tesla. The UAW has nothing to lose when Tesla becomes the first company to fully automate car assembly (including the interior and wiring). Other automaker's would never copy Tesla's new automated assembly lines, reducing the number of autoworkers by a large percentage. Unionized Tesla employees would never go on strike to prevent increases in automated assembly. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  37. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    I thought Tesla bought many of its facilities from failed companies on the cheap? Hence they didn't build those based on local regulations...but maybe their previous car-making owners did?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  38. This is what happens when you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when you have a bunch of snowflakes working for you.

    1. Re:This is what happens when you by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those pussies, wanting to sleep between working 18 hours 7 days a week. Next they'll demand payment, I tell you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Re:i know people who worked in an old vehicle fact by Rei · · Score: 1

    I don't think many people just stumble into a Musk company. For the most part, you know what you're getting into, you believe that what you're doing is the future as much as Musk does, and you put in the hours to make it happen. I don't think someone who didn't actually believe in the goals would last long in any of his companies.

    --
    You're treating a symptom while the disease rages on. The fish rots from the head. Why not cut off the head?
  40. So what do these folks want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to be paid well for showing up, doing what they are told and not having to think.

    Instead of repeating the story of being in pain by Friday, why not figure out a better way.
    If a worker had a practical solution, it would be in Tesla's interest to do it.

    It isn't a sustainable system for workers to expect others to make good jobs for them.
    They have to take part in the process and find a smarter way to get the job done, that is a win win path.
    The other path is to take what is available.

    The path that doesn't work is to let a union make the job dumber and then have it go away.
    The only place where a union could make sense is if the company is not able to see a good, practical idea.
    I find it hard to believe that that is the case here.

  41. Looks like another FUD article by MrJones · · Score: 1

    Tesla is a big factory and 100 or 200 people are below the average injuries, so you can say Tesla is one of the safest factory out there to work for. Again, nice try on FUD

    --
    Get my e-mail after a captcha test in: http://tinymailt
  42. Re: i know people who worked in an old vehicle fac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably. Non-union company: union says Horrors, there are injurys, management doesn't care about you, unionize! Union company: union says Horrors, there are injuries, management doesn't care about us, strike!

  43. MISRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Basically making software MISRAble for everyone involved in automotive software since 1998...

  44. I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked a few months of 16 hour days, 7 days per week, at the Tesla factory (installing robots). I can vouch that this article is spot on the money from my experience.

    I've worked in other auto plants, and I saw many things that raised my eyebrows at Tesla; including safety related issues. It is a 100% different experience at a Japanese factory. At a Japanese auto factory, you can't even cross an isle without stopping and pointing the direction you will take. At Tesla, I've seen people driving hi-lows way too fast, drinking coffee, and talking on a cellphone all at once. That kind of stuff gets you kicked out of a Japanese plant immediately.

    Tesla really needs the UAW.

    1. Re:I was there by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      And yet, the article is not referring at all to accidents due to the above sort of thing (vehicle impact injuries, squashed by fork-lifts, ...).
      Safety can be achieved in different ways.

  45. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Tesla has quite a few veterans on the payroll. I wonder how many of those suffer PTSD events on the job.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  46. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with your office complex? My office has 350 employees. I've worked there nearly 7 years. We've had 1 ambulance call in that time.

  47. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by TWX · · Score: 1

    The organization's main vehicle maintenance facility is based here, so the fleet vehicles are serviced there. At least one of the calls was because of a workplace injury, I think an employee fell off a ladder that was being used to get to a vehicle that was positioned up on a lift.

    I know that another one was a heart attack.

    Not sure about the third one.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  48. Re: "Ambulances have been called more than 100 tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say it in jest.. But where i work i have witnessed texting and driving flts as well as floor scrubbers

  49. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by rfengr · · Score: 1

    At my place they just call the hearse. Had a few people drop over dead from heart attacks. Same scenario; long walk from the parking lot in the morning. One guy had been dead 15 minutes before found in a hallway.

  50. Greedy capitalists by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    TFA says

    This is not some situation where, for example, we are just greedy capitalists who decided to skimp on safety in order to have more profits and dividends and that kind of thing. It's just a question of how much money we lose.

    Losing money to win later is called investment. The profit increases as the losing phase shortens, hence we are exactly in the situation where greedy capitalists decided to skimp on safety to increase profits.

  51. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    It could be that Tesla is over-cautious when it comes to work-place injuries, and therefore calls an ambulance in cases where, really, a co-worker could just drive them to the hospital.

    Long ago, hurt cooking as a teenager, the boss had a co-worker drive me to get treated for a bad grease burn. Today, I see why. It kept their "reportable accidents" down.

  52. whaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What this proves is that no matter what happens, conservatards like you are not gonna be happy and are gonna bitch and bitch and bitch regardless of the outcome. You think you're being cute but you only look pathetic.

  53. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by harlequinn · · Score: 1

    "A factory or business will have healthy employable people within a certain hirable age range."

    Lol, yeah nah. They won't all be healthy. Not nearly.

  54. Too Much Musk by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    It's supposed to be about the employees having problems, not Elon sound bites. The article is 50% Muskoil, 50% everyone else.

    I know what it's like to have a CEO pushing too hard. I worked at Miniscribe in the QT Wiles days. It was a do-anything-to-hit-the-numbers environment. Don't know nothing 'bout no bricks though.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  55. HAHAHA by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    A manager or CEO sleeping on the factory floor in a sleeping bag is not what a manager "should do", it's something made just for show that is usually irked by workers that are not in for the cult-like fanatic ride.

    This is basically the same crap some game and software development companies say about crunch time. If problems were solved by managers and CEOs putting up little shows, there would be no need for labor laws. People need to understand that even if management gets sick when employees also get sick due to poor work conditions, that's never enough for businesses to avoid liability. Tesla is basically risking a stream of future, justifiable lawsuits there.

    What good management does is finding ways to keep the company profitable while not endangering workers' health because they can't pay or find more workers, diversify shifts, improve the line, among others.

    1. Re:HAHAHA by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'd suspect the workers would get even more irked if, during their 12-hour days 7 days a week, Musk popped in now and then, looking fresh and rested, between minivacations.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  56. Nonsense -- plenty of "rare" earths by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ra...
    http://investingnews.com/daily...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    "Despite their name, rare earth elements are â" with the exception of the radioactive promethium â" relatively plentiful in Earth's crust, with cerium being the 25th most abundant element at 68 parts per million, or as abundant as copper."

    And batteries can be recycled...

    If production processes pollute, that is a matter for regulations and subsidies or taxes to adjust for externalities.

    Fossil fuels, for example, should have a huge tax on them to account for all the environmental and health problems they cause (including mercury pollution) and risks (like the need for a big military to defend long supply lines) with the tax money redistributed as a basic income. You just pay those costs in health insurance premiums, lower productivity from health issues, higher taxes for the military, groundwater pollution cleanup tax costs, and so on -- instead of at the pump or wall outlet -- and thus distorting market forces.
    https://www.pri.org/stories/20...
    http://www.environmentamerica....

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  57. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like the job? Quit. I'm sure in this economy you will find another one quickly (snicker). This friendly security guard will escort you out. What did you say? Changed your mind? Sorry, we do not allow unmotivated and negative individuals in our workforce. I would refrain from any additional commentary that could be interpreted as a threat or be used as grounds for legal action against you. Dismissed and good luck on your next professional challenge.

    1. Re:Too bad by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Big words for someone who isn't bullet proof and living in a country where having a gun is legal.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  58. It's not coal mine work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not like anyone is breaking rocks or digging ditches all day at tesla ffs. People are so soft nowadays

  59. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by TWX · · Score: 1

    Could well be. Unfortunately given the differences in company policy and attitude it may not really be possible to compare Tesla to other automakers in this regard.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  60. look. 13 years of loss. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    look. 13 years of loss. 50 bn market cap.

    that is the zenith of overvalued.

    at least musk is admitting that it's overvalued and making a loss :D. unlike his last years book shenigans.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  61. Counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The article also sheds light on the kind of manager Musk is. In early 2016, Musk slept on the factory floor in a sleeping bag "to make it the most painful thing possible. I knew people were having a hard time, working long hours, and on hard jobs. I wanted to work harder than they did, to put even more hours in," he was quoted as saying. "Because that's what I think a manager should do.""

    The best thing a boss can do is ensure he hires enough resources to do the work without pushing everyone over the brink. Occasionally, perhaps, in extraordinary circumstances, people might have to work all hours for a specific goal, but the normal state of things should be to give people acceptable working hours. I was in the military and you accept that when the balloon goes up you may be up and working non-stop, getting kip where you can, but even there it's not the norm. Aside from the brief bursts of action, there are long periods of fairly normal working conditions.

    The best boss isn't the one who stays working till midnight to show that he can work harder than everybody else. Nobody feels entirely comfortable knocking off before the boss, so that kind of behaviour drives people to stay longer, work too hard and make themselves stressed, unhappy and unhealthy. The best boss is the one that leaves on the dot, every day, and expects his workers to do the same. That boss might have to take his laptop home and carry on working till midnight, that's just the breaks if you run a company. But he should not be making his employees feel uncomfortable about routinely going home at the end of their standard working hours. Perhaps Musk means well and really is trying to lead from the front, but it's quite likely he's just leading his workforce into exhaustion if he is unable to provide adequate resources to do the required work in the allotted working time.

  62. No, no, you DO feel the future by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that you do already feel how the future will be for those of us who actually do the work.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  63. Comparison by DrYak · · Score: 1

    you will read that Tesla's workplace safety is actually 32% better than the industry average.
    From TFA: [Tesla's] record of safety incidents went from slightly above the industry average in late 2016, to a performance in the first few months of 2017 that was 32% better than average.

    That was exactly what I was going to ask :
    how do these numbers compare with the rest of the industry ?

    It's good that they are both :
    - making progress (as mentioned in the summary)
    - already better than the average.

    i.e.: they are making good efforts.

    (Compare the situation with Apple's Foxconn reports. They were within the industry average. So on one hand, this wasn't as dramatic as the news wanted to make it seem, on the other hand Apple wasn't putting any effort back then to make things better)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  64. Good laugh. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Woker union / Database Unions / C union :

    Too bad I've already commented and can't "+1 Funny".

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  65. Re:i know people who worked in an old vehicle fact by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    You tend to have more cases of exhaustion and fatigue when people actually work instead of sitting benched doing the least amount of work their contract allows them to get away with.

  66. Re:"Ambulances have been called more than 100 time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in an oil refinery with around 2,000 employees, and we had 4 ambulance calls in the 3 years I've worked there. All were very big deals, with incident investigations, even though 2 of the 4 were medical problems unrelated to the work environment. When one employee had a heart attack at work, AEDs were installed in every building within 2 weeks, and every member of the emergency response brigade (approx. 10% of employees), were trained on their use within the month.

    As our safety department will remind everyone on a regular basis "We're not making chocolate milk here". having a TRIR above zero in today's United States is, and should be seen as, completely unacceptable. Even slips, trips, and falls can be prevented through proper design. The attitude of injuries in the name of "whatever" are OK is what gets people hurt, and needs to be stopped.

  67. Sounds Fishy to me by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    One way to bring down the popularity of something good is to smear it's reputation.

    1. Re:Sounds Fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk is indeed not above trying to smear competitor's reputation, but I don't think it has much to do with how he treats Tesla employees.

  68. Re:i know people who worked in an old vehicle fact by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I don't think many people just stumble into a Musk company. For the most part, you know what you're getting into, you believe that what you're doing is the future as much as Musk does, and you put in the hours to make it happen. I don't think someone who didn't actually believe in the goals would last long in any of his companies.

    Anyone who went to work on a production line in a factory thinking they were part of some mission to change the world would be deluded. In reality, the only people who believe or say things like that are the owners. It's good business to get workers to put in extra unpaid hours.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it