Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 55: Flash Will Become 'Ask To Activate' For Everyone (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from BleepingComputer: Starting with the release of Firefox 55, the Adobe Flash plugin for Firefox will be set to "Ask to Activate" by default for all users. This move was announced in August 2016, as part of Mozilla's plan to move away from plugins built around the NPAPI technology. Flash is currently the only NPAPI plugin still supported in Firefox, and moving its default setting from "Always Activate" to "Ask to Activate" is just another step towards the final step of stop supporting Flash altogether. This new Flash default setting is already live in Firefox's Nightly Edition and will move through the Alpha and Beta versions as Firefox nears its v55 Stable release. By moving Flash to a click-to-play setting, Firefox will indirectly start to favor HTML5 content over Flash for all multimedia content. Other browsers like Google Chrome, Brave, or Opera already run Flash on a click-to-play setting, or disabled by default. Firefox is scheduled to be released on August 8, 2017.

114 comments

  1. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flash is worse than systemd.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blasphemy. If Flash was truly worse than SystemD, it would have subsumed the entirety of WIndows into FlashOS by now.

    2. Re:About time by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now you can get all your ads served in javascript, and they're even harder to block.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just "harder." Blocking ads is equivalent to the Halting Problem, which is undecidable.

    4. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blasphemy. If Flash was truly worse than SystemD, it would have subsumed the entirety of WIndows into FlashOS by now.

      It did already.

    5. Re:About time by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Not really. In principle, any ad which a human can recognise as an ad, a machine can also recognise as an ad.

      The issue of 'paid articles' is the edge-case here.

    6. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.... click to activate systemd.....

      Nope won't work, they have udev under their clutches!!!

  2. People still use flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I uninstalled Flash about a year after Youtube went HTML5 and everyone followed, when I realized I hadn't used Flash in a year but it was just sitting there silently waiting to get me pwnt.

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:People still use flash? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I uninstalled Flash about a year after Youtube went HTML5

      You never edit videos on YouTube, do you?
       

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:People still use flash? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      It was good for video and mic support over different OS, browsers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:People still use flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and the other 0.0001% of people in the world that do that can keep on using flash.

      Don't blame me when you get owned.

    4. Re:People still use flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point.

  3. Badger? by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    You mean they won't let me get my daily fix of Badger Badger Badger?

    (To say nothing of Magical Trevor.)

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    1. Re:Badger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean they won't let me get my daily fix of Badger Badger Badger?

      Seems to have been converted to HTML5 using Swiffy.

    2. Re:Badger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to be a great conversion, but the author used artistic license and decided to show a black rectangle surrounded with a white border and a black background. I think there are badgers on the screen but sleeping in their foxhole.

      The Privacy Badger did find something to look for. Good job.

    3. Re:Badger? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Its frame rate in Firefox on my laptop with an Atom N450 CPU is so much lower than that of the original Flash version that it desyncs noticeably within the first ten seconds, with the first "mushroom mushroom" appearing over a second late.

    4. Re:Badger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine for me. I can't help you with your buyer's remorse.

    5. Re:Badger? by tepples · · Score: 1

      You mentioned buyer's remorse. I am willing to correct this by purchasing the replacement hardware that you recommend for the following requirements:

      Let's say I want to buy a subnotebook computer (a laptop with a 10.1 to 11.6 inch display) to run HTML5 vector animations, GCC, and Wine applications inside GNU/Linux. (Wine requires x86 or x86-64 architecture.) I also want WLAN, Bluetooth, audio, and suspend to work. Which subnotebook computer brand is any good nowadays?

    6. Re:Badger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say I want to buy a subnotebook computer

      Here you go, my son. Pick one and buy it.

    7. Re:Badger? by tepples · · Score: 1

      I can't help you with your buyer's remorse.

      inside GNU/Linux

      Here you go, my son. Pick one and buy it.

      Doing so might result in the same sort of buyer's remorse mentioned earlier because the list you cited includes the ASUS T100TA and X205TA, which scored poorly in DebianOn. Sound, suspend, and Bluetooth fail on both the T100TA and X205TA. How would I go about narrowing the list you cited to only those products that work well with GNU/Linux?

    8. Re:Badger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to only those products that work well with GNU/Linux?

      Good grief, boy. If your software is so shit that you can't use it with confidence then it's time to switch to better software.

      I'll make it simple for you, child. Buy the Lenovo Yoga 710 11 and run Fedora on it. You're welcome.

    9. Re:Badger? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Answering my own question: I guess one of the costs of using free software is having to copy and paste the make and model into a search engine and add the word Linux for all dozen models in a particular roundup.

  4. I used to blame flash for everything too by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    I used to blame flash for everything too, but since the Internet has become a whole lot more flash-free I now get by without it even being installed, but both Firefox and Chrome still keep regularly freezing/crashing, in fact more than ever, on both Windows and Linux.

    1. Re:I used to blame flash for everything too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. They're far more stable for me then they were back when I had to use Flash. Sounds like a case for our old friends, troubleshooting and bug reporting.

    2. Re:I used to blame flash for everything too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's piles and piles of Javascript. They run browsers out of memory.

    3. Re:I used to blame flash for everything too by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Either you've got a rosy coloured view of the past or something very wrong with your browser installation.

      If Chrome crashes once a month then it's a bad month. Firefox is likewise not unstable enough to note.

    4. Re:I used to blame flash for everything too by tepples · · Score: 2

      Most unnecessary JavaScript is associated with scripts that track you from one website to another. Users of Firefox can therefore drastically reduce execution of unnecessary JavaScript by activating tracking protection across the whole web. In about:config, set privacy.trackingprotection.enabled to true.

      The one downside of enabling tracking protection is that you lose the ability to read websites whose operators believe that cross-site tracking is part of the economic bargain that qualifies you to receive articles from the site. Last I checked, this included WIRED, the INQUIRER, The Atlantic, and Jellynote.

    5. Re:I used to blame flash for everything too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Firefox and I don't install Flash, I have no problems pretty much anywhere.

  5. Bugger HTML5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *All* media should be click-to-play, regardless of format.

    Seriously, what is the case for auto-playing? Does anyone like that?

    1. Re:Bugger HTML5 by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      To make matters worse, they hid the "click to activate" setting for HTML5 video in some obscure about:config entry. At the very least, it should be in the main config dialogs.

    2. Re: Bugger HTML5 by McCovican · · Score: 1

      That's because the setting in a:c that blocks autoplay, also largely breaks HTML5 video altogether. You'll find a lot of stuff won't play at all with that setting enabled.

    3. Re:Bugger HTML5 by tepples · · Score: 1

      That can be abused. Watch a site show only the headline and first sentence until the viewer clicks the "Read More" button, which treats the click as an authorization to play for as long as the page remains visible.

      A policy to require a separate click for each media element would be impractical as well. A web-based video game would end up pausing every single time an event occurs that results in playing a sound effect. You'd look for the native version only to find that the native version is for a platform other than yours.

    4. Re: Bugger HTML5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot more plays with click to play enabled than with the browser uninstalled or html5 video disabled completely.

    5. Re:Bugger HTML5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what is the case for auto-playing? Does anyone like that?

      YouTube (or any other video/streaming site)

    6. Re: Bugger HTML5 by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      A. I haven't seen a problem with videos not working. Granted, there are only about 3 sites on the web where I have ever wanted a video to play. Everywhere else, I don't care if it breaks.

      B. I don't see any technical reason why it should break. How is it any different from faking a "pause" button right after the page load? If it is breaking, the browser vendors should fix it. If the protocol somehow can't handle it, fix the protocol. Get it done.

    7. Re: Bugger HTML5 by McCovican · · Score: 1

      A: Lucky you. I'm gonna go ahead and guess that if they actually put this into the primary options, not many other users would be so relaxed about it breaking content. B: The great almighty Waffle Iron has spoken. It shall be so.

    8. Re: Bugger HTML5 by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      If you think I'm being unreasonable, maybe you could tell my why it breaks, what is the justification for creating such a crappy architecture, and what is the justification for not fixing the crappy design?

    9. Re: Bugger HTML5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The servers only give you a limited time to download the content, after that no video for you. I had click to play youtube and it would never load unless I clicked play right away.

    10. Re: Bugger HTML5 by McCovican · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Mozilla engineer dude, I don't know why they think the way they do. I was just trying to help explain that the a:c fix isn't as simple as you think. Also, explaining to you why things work they way they do isn't actually a prerequisite of thinking that your entitlement complex is unreasonable.

    11. Re: Bugger HTML5 by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      I don't have an entitlement complex. As I pointed out, the config fix works for my use case. That doesn't make this alleged limitation any less stupid, though. For example, there are a lot of people on metered data plans, and auto-play videos are undoubtedly costing them a significant amount of money. Saddling them with this crap is plainly irresponsible.

  6. I've had it on ask to activate for years by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    who in their right mind would run flash on by default?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Who in their right mind would run flash?

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same kind of people who run javascript by default.

    3. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a large corpus of games, animations, and so on, written in Flash. Unlike DRM and advertising, those are actually useful.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      who in their right mind would run flash on by default?

      I was still using Macs when I installed the Flashblock extension on Firefox, so that was a good decade ago.

      Who in their right mind ships a browser that has Flash autoplay enabled? Users were fed up before Flashblock was written (in response).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I would be happy with click-to-play if it wasn't such a bugger to keep up to date. The update mechanism for Flash is horrible. The way Chrome does it, where Flash is bundled with browser updates, is much better, but Firefox still relies on Adobe to keep the plugin up to date.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: I've had it on ask to activate for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo apt-get upgrade

    7. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really wish Flash was available as a reasonable stand-alone executable that actually works.

      This way, we'd have all the good Flash content still working; that on the web Flash degenerated into a tool for DRMing videos hurts what I consider legitimate uses. And those would be nice to have the same way we have NES emulators.

      Especially if it's portable -- somehow every dev around me talks about jumping the x86 ship for arm64, where nothing Adobe exists.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    8. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by mjwx · · Score: 1

      There's a large corpus of games, animations, and so on, written in Flash. Unlike DRM and advertising, those are actually useful.

      Not to mention vendors who still use it... Looking at you VMWare... who are killing off the very usable, solid, stable, fast and quite nice Vcentre thick client.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:I've had it on ask to activate for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why has no one mentioned porn yet?
      most of it requires flash too.

  7. Autoplay abuse by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, what is the case for auto-playing? Does anyone like that?

    Advertisers like it.

    We, speaking of the majority, variously known as "the product" or "the victim", depending on how honest one is being at any particular moment, don't count. Because we, again speaking of the majority, will continue to return to sites that abuse us in this fashion.

    I highly recommend a local blacklist. When a site does this, slap a 127.0.0.1 into your hosts file for the site name. This will prevent the site from ever loading into your browser again via normal links.

    Or, you can keep going back. And they'll keep abusing you.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Autoplay abuse by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I've started adding auto-play video domains to my hosts only a few months ago, adding domains manually every time. I think I only have about 50 in my list and it's already pretty rare to see something auto-play.

      Yes it's easier if you get your hosts file somewhere else, but from my own habits and from what I've read, most people only visit a small number of known websites so it's not like adding domains to hosts is a permanent job.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Autoplay abuse by trawg · · Score: 1

      Or, you can keep going back. And they'll keep abusing you.

      I like going back over and over to close the website immediately, so that their stats show that more users bounce after a very short period of time, which hopefully they correlate to the addition of autoplaying video.

      I suspect I'm an edge case though and most people happily sit there and soak it up.

    3. Re:Autoplay abuse by doom · · Score: 1

      That's how I'm currently handling full-screen javascript pop-ups (sign up for our newsletter!). If enough of us learn to hit control-w fast, maybe they'll get the message.

    4. Re:Autoplay abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC one of the original "ad-blockers" was nothing more than a list of known add-sites pointing to localhost inserted into hosts file. This works great for a few sites, but quickly bogs down everything.

    5. Re:Autoplay abuse by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      This works great for a few sites, but quickly bogs down everything

      Not unless you're running on an 80286, it doesn't. Probably not even then.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  8. Re:Mozilla by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    What do you mean by "convert flash to HTML5"?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  9. Re:Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's not Mozilla's problem to convert Flash to HTML5 on the fly. There are plenty of tools available to create HTML5 animations. Adobe itself supports CreateJS and publishes to HTML5 in Adobe Animate. Adobe could also take it a step further and produce a WebAssembly build of Flash player to support old Flash junk that the authors are too lazy to convert to HTML5.

  10. What? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1, Funny

    What's "Flash"?

    Is it like COBOL or something?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's something that can improve pictures in poor lighting conditions. Apparently HTML5 is letting websites access to the computer's cameras through the browser and Firefox is trying to play it safe by not accidentally blinding anyone who is driving. The clues are in the details. It's being rolled out to Firefox Nightly first. This should greatly improve night pictures. The daily Firefox builds will likely get it later.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COBOL is useful. Flash on the other hand...

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's "Firefox"?

      Is it like COBOL or something?

  11. HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least Flash can be blocked / click-to-play. While, in major web browsers, HTML5 video and audio auto-play by default with seemingly no way to disable.

    Without running add-ons, is there any simple way to disable HTML5 auto-play in any major web browser?

    1. Re:HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two seconds of searching in "about:config" turned up "media.autoplay.enabled" so maybe you could try it.

    2. Re:HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Thanks. Is there any similar way to disable in Chrome or Edge?

    3. Re:HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok. Thanks. Is there any similar way to disable in Chrome or Edge?

      apparently.

    4. Re:HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. You may not be aware of a search engine called "Google". It's quite popular with the kids nowadays.

      Using whatever browser you have (even Internet Explorer) search for the word "google" and then click on the link to bring you to the Google site. Then type in "chrome disable html5 autoplay" and see what comes up.

    5. Re:HTML5 Worse than Flash Due to Autoplay by hviezda14 · · Score: 1

      Dunno why moderated to 0, please moderate parent up. It was helpful.

  12. WTF is with all the anti-Flash hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it was risky then anti-Virus or Apple would update it in next microversion. There is more working Flash content then all modern game consoles (never more than a NES but you know...). Flash just grows and whois trying to clip it?

    It is a content delivery api independent of browsers, so I look at it's critics with absolute skepticism: how many console games can be played on competing consoles?

    Flash is here to stay; if you cant embrace and extend it competitively then make something better. All the discussion here is like when Linux 2.0.34 distributions installed on a desktop running FVWM95 were advertised as a competitor to Windows 98. So embrace the existing API and make it more secure.

    Bunch of Microsoft Stallmans in this forum.

    1. Re:WTF is with all the anti-Flash hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash is here to stay

      LOL.

    2. Re:WTF is with all the anti-Flash hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash is here to stay

      Even Adobe is telling people to convert to HTML5. Look at the steady decline in Flash usage. Flash has lost.

    3. Re:WTF is with all the anti-Flash hype? by thsths · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am sure people said the same about Silverlight, ActiveX and the Quicktime plugin.

    4. Re:WTF is with all the anti-Flash hype? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am sure people said the same about Silverlight, ActiveX and the Quicktime plugin.

      I'll give you Quicktime and ActiveX, but I don't think anybody outside of Redmond ever said that Silverlight was here to stay.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  13. you're daft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a large corpus of games, animations, and so on, written in Flash. Unlike DRM and advertising, those are actually useful.

    games and animations running on a deprecated platform are "useful"??? How are they "useful" when you can't PAY people to install the required runtime? Get out your dictionary and look up the word "useful".

    1. Re:you're daft by tepples · · Score: 1

      games and animations running on a deprecated platform are "useful"???

      The Nintendo Entertainment System is likewise "a deprecated platform". Yet many classic games are exclusive to it, not having been (legally) ported to a newer platform.

  14. If only *all* active content were like that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like Javascript to be "ask to activate", too. Actually, all active content.

    For me, the browser has become a kind of vacuum cleaner, sucking up every disgusting stuff it finds on the Internets and trying to execute it. On my computer.
      I treat it like a diseased thing.

  15. It's not needed by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I got fed up with the constant upgrade nags about a year ago. Occasionally video sites will refuse to work, but most of what I failed to load were ads, or annoying autoplay videos on articles I was trying to read. sadly these seem to be shifting away from Flash as well.

  16. Quick! Close the barn door! by jensend · · Score: 1

    Those horses bolted 20 years ago.

    This decision should have been made with the introduction of NPAPI back in the heady days of Netscape 2.0.

  17. Many sites still use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the National weather service sites and many loops of maps ans sat images and radar still use Flash as the default. I am all for moving away from Flash but maybe these browsers are preaching to the wrong group. Its not the user that's the problem, its the web sites who refuse to allow Flash to be retired.

    1. Re:Many sites still use it by tepples · · Score: 1

      "Default" yes, "only" no.

      At the top of National Weather Service's radar pages is a link "Go to Standard Version". NWS refers to the animated GIF as "Standard Version" and the Flash animation as "Enhanced Version". For example, "standard" radar for IWX (Northern Indiana) looks like this: no terrain layer but still usable for many.

  18. i get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flash stinks.

    it is rarely accessible, it is abused by advertisers and for user tracking.. but this is a simple fix. 'ask to activate'

    which is FAR BETTER than the alternative.. which we are ALSO getting rammed down our throats: the demise of the flexibility of firefox as we know it, and its massive library of legitimate and useful addons.

    careful of what you wish for.

    soon enough, you will all be begging for the 'old' firefox, even if that meant it included flash support.

    the new firefox will suck.

    if you use firefox, make a list of those addons you can't live without.... for which there are no true alternatives in a world with a fully-chromified webextension-enabled firefox. that list will make grown men weep uncontrollably.

    there's a reason why those who use firefox, use it: addons. chrome addons are horrible, the chrome 'store' is horrible. change for the sake of change is horrible.

    we did NOT ask for *THIS*.

    when 52esr is retired early next year, that will be the saddest day on the internet since.. well, since the internet began.

  19. Still allows tracking, cap use, and CPU use by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In principle, any ad which a human can recognise as an ad, a machine can also recognise as an ad.

    I thought the goal of ad blocking was to avoid the cross-site tracking, data transfer quota use, and CPU use of requesting, downloading, and processing an ad in the first place. For a long time, Flash's content-type on a site that doesn't have entertaining vector animations was a very good predictor of a particular element being undesirable.

    1. Re:Still allows tracking, cap use, and CPU use by doom · · Score: 1

      The goal of ad-blocking is to keep from being irritated by morons who have you confused with an idiot who can be sold to by being irritated.

  20. Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by tepples · · Score: 1

    Even Adobe is telling people to convert to HTML5

    In part because it requires authors to stop using an outdated yet resellable* used copy of Flash and start renting Adobe Animate in Creative Cloud.

    * The license agreements of commercial off-the-shelf proprietary software usually have a provision for license transfer along with all copies of the product.

    1. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Why would encouraging them to write their ads in HTML5 require them to use specific software?

    2. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start renting Adobe Animate in Creative Cloud

      Flash is a proprietary platform using proprietary software from the vendor, Adobe. If you don't like it, then leave it. Flash is redundant these days so there's no need to use it. It's all very simple.

    3. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by tepples · · Score: 1

      Flash is a proprietary platform using proprietary software from the vendor, Adobe.

      A paid-for copy of proprietary Macromedia Flash or proprietary Adobe Flash prior to Creative Cloud can still be used without charge. This is not true of proprietary Adobe Animate in Creative Cloud.

      If you don't like it, then leave it.

      So how can an author leave Flash and take his old creative works with him? Which application distributed as free software do you recommend for creating HTML5 vector animations, particularly for converting old FLA source files?

    4. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how can an author leave Flash and take his old creative works with him?

      That's the nature of a proprietary platform, kid. You're locked in. It's hilarious that you don't understand this. It's sad that you're even try to argue the point. The best you can do is convert to HTML5.

      Which application distributed as free software

      Flash isn't free software. Why should your HTML5 animation tool be free software? Anyway, let me help you with your quest.

    5. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by tepples · · Score: 1

      Flash isn't free software. Why should your HTML5 animation tool be free software?

      Because you put so much emphasis on the word "proprietary". What's the benefit of replacing one proprietary tool with another proprietary tool?

    6. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the benefit of replacing one proprietary tool with another proprietary tool?

      You're confusing the tools and the platform. It's very simple: the HTML5 platform is not proprietary. Flash = proprietary platform, HTML5 = open platform.

    7. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by tepples · · Score: 1

      In theory, Flash is an open platform as well since Open Screen Project removed restrictions on third party SWF players.

    8. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theory ain't practice, kid.

    9. Re:Can't buy Adobe Animate for HTML5; must rent by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then we appear to disagree on the definition of an "open platform", and discussion will be unfruitful until this is resolved. Does it mean "one for which a free writer and reader could lawfully be created"? Or does it mean "one for which a free writer and reader already exists"? If neither, than what does it mean to you?

  21. sudo: Bad command or file name by tepples · · Score: 1

    sudo apt-get upgrade

    "sudo" is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.

    (Translation: Windows UAC doesn't appear to support running an elevated Command Prompt as a subshell in a non-elevated Command Prompt window.)

    And to answer your next question: Some people continue to run Windows because they've found that GNU/Linux doesn't fully support the chipset of their laptop.

  22. Re:Mozilla by tepples · · Score: 1

    Adobe itself supports CreateJS and publishes to HTML5 in Adobe Animate

    Which stops working after a month even if you pay for it.

    Adobe could also take it a step further and produce a WebAssembly build of Flash player to support old Flash junk that the authors are too lazy to convert to HTML5.

    But that wouldn't make Adobe money. Instead of letting authors convert works made with used copies of Flash, Adobe wants to lock authors into a Creative Cloud rental agreement.

  23. Ask to activate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask to activate becomes default for Flash? So I can finally get rid the add-on I have used to provide the same functionality, ever since Mozilla devs decided that ask to activate is only for other plugins and outdated Flash versions, and rather than clicking play, you only got the options "no" and "always"?

    Oh right, I disabled Flash two weeks ago.

  24. Gullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > variously known as "the product" or "the victim" [...]

    My preferred term is "the gullet". Feels about right.

  25. Original Opera/Presto did long before all did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: 1 of Opera's (not CHOpera Chinese/Chrome) options was "only on demand" for FLASH, ages ago. I still think it's a great browser & should be resurrected + improved w/ what's been done to javascript in the newer browsers (& Opera used to be the "speed king" ALL THE WAY AROUND, not just HTML renderings (always fastest there) but also in javascript processing back then - but since then, the latest browsers made BIG strides since then in that area).

    APK

    P.S.=> Presto is a great engine - it's a SHAME to see it put out to pasture the way it has been... apk

  26. Sites still use Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago I uninstalled Flash from all my computers and I'm still amazed how many web sites greet me with the red "This requires the latest version of Flash. Click here to install" banner. Really? Is this 1999 or something? Even Adobe has given up on Flash.

  27. Other than Animate, what converts FLA to HTML5? by tepples · · Score: 1

    their ads

    Who said ads? On sites such as Newgrounds, Albino Blacksheep, and Dagobah, the SWF is the primary work that the viewer has chosen to view.

    Even Adobe is telling people to convert to HTML5

    it requires authors to [...] start renting Adobe Animate in Creative Cloud.

    Why would encouraging them to write [things] in HTML5 require them to use specific software?

    Because as far as I am aware, only said "specific software" is capable of converting the author's existing FLA source file to an HTML5 canvas animation. Otherwise, the author would have to remake the vector animation or game from scratch. Or what package other than Adobe Animate can convert FLA to something modern?

    1. Re:Other than Animate, what converts FLA to HTML5? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      their ads

      Who said ads?

      The link from the AC you replied to is called "Convert Flash Ads to HTML5"

      Even Adobe is telling people to convert to HTML5

      it requires authors to [...] start renting Adobe Animate in Creative Cloud.

      Why would encouraging them to write [things] in HTML5 require them to use specific software?

      Because as far as I am aware, only said "specific software" is capable of converting the author's existing FLA source file to an HTML5 canvas animation. Otherwise, the author would have to remake the vector animation or game from scratch. Or what package other than Adobe Animate can convert FLA to something modern?

      Yes, convert but why couldn't they write their news ads (because, again the original link is about ADS) in HTML5 using whatever IDE they choose?

      Newgrounds, et al are a different subject. A bloo bloo, my Silverlight/Java Applet/Macromedia Shockwave game doesn't work in 2017 ;_;

  28. lag everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's HTML5 for you. Now try decoding video with an unsupported GPU that used to work in flash.

    The only counter argument is "buy a new machine" without fail.

    1. Re:lag everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now try decoding video with an unsupported GPU that used to work in flash.

      Meh. I have a 10 year old Intel Core 2 Duo system running Windows XP. It decodes 1080p VP9 HTML5 video on YouTube just fine.

      So I suppose my counter argument is "buy an old machine". They can be had for cheap these days.

  29. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no big loss.

  30. empower the users! by doom · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cool if Firefox 55 was "ask to activate"?

  31. Fortunately, I've got most of the badges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Kongregate. I just load up the page and I've got the extra points from the Badge of the Day. On Monday, I get my Kongpanion. On Friday, I get the Shiny version. Rarely do I encounter a game I haven't gotten the badges for. Don't need Flash to load for those games. But a lot of new games are still being made in Flash. It's still more efficient and reliable than Javascript or Unity engine.

  32. Re:Autoplay abuse - start with this list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

    About 17,000 sites. I have loaded into my firewall's DNS. Cleans up all machines at one time. Yes, it is not prfect and you will be complains about being a a ADBlocker, but you are not. You are a tracking blocker.

  33. Re:empower the users! - why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All thre browsers do bad things to the users. I cannot use firefox for managing self-signed certifacte website anymore. MY firewall is blocked, access to printers are blocked.

    Chrome, Edge are not much better. They are smart enought to be at least like SSH. Once I note that this site is "good"
    REMEMBER IT!!!

    Do not hide 4 clicks alter to gain access to machine on my own subnet. ARGH!!

  34. Re:Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which stops working after a month even if you pay for it.

    So don't use it, kid. Use another HTML5 animation tool. There are many to choose from. The point is that Flash is redundant. Flash is a dead-end, single vendor platform with no future.

  35. Re:Mozilla by tepples · · Score: 1

    Use another HTML5 animation tool. There are many to choose from.

    Among the many HTML5 animation tools to choose from, which are worth one's time to evaluate?

    Among the many HTML5 animation tools to choose from, which can import and convert legacy FLA source files?

  36. Re:Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which are worth one's time to evaluate?

    You tell me, boy.

    which can import and convert legacy FLA source files?

    You really should learn how to use a search engine. Your laziness wastes time.

  37. Re:Mozilla by tepples · · Score: 1

    Google doesn't include the experience and expertise of other Slashdot users reading this discussion.

  38. Re:Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why so afraid face up to the realities for yourself? It's lazy. I thought the Flash Defense Force was stronger than this. I'm disappointed.