Amazon's 1.7 Million Free Bananas 'Disrupting' Local Fruit Economy (consumerist.com)
Amazon has transformed businesses including retailing, filmmaking and data storage. But no one anticipated the bananas. It started with a brainstorm from founder and CEO Jeff Bezos that Amazon should offer everyone near its headquarters -- not just employees -- healthy, eco-friendly snacks as a public service. After considering oranges, Amazon picked bananas, and opened its first Community Banana Stand in late 2015. However, not everyone is pleased with the ecommerce giant's effort. From a report: Although there is no money in Amazon's community banana stands -- where the company has been offering free fruit to both workers and locals in Seattle since 2015 -- the tech giant's largesse is changing the banana landscape for some nearby businesses. [...] Thus far, the company says it's handed out more than 1.7 million free banana, reports The Wall Street Journal. But while many folks are fans of the free bananas, others say it's changing banana consumption in the community: Some workers say it's harder to find bananas at local grocery stores, while nearby eateries have also stopped selling as many banana as they used to.
They keep for a fairly long time, taste great, and come with their own packaging. When you're done eating, the packaging is also a source of fantastic comic relief if used properly. You also can always get a laugh by running around swinging a banana around and making monkey noises.
Transparent attempt to discredit Basic Income is transparent.
Who would have thunk it, giving away bananas disrupts the sale of bananas in nearby stores.
Over Amazon giving away bananas. I think they should add one to every Prime order they ship out.
Uh huh.
They just have to stop doing this, then. I mean, it's tragic when any business is harmed in any way - but this is just too far. The banana eatery business is what this country was built on, and I can't imagine the hardships faced by grocers selling less bananas than normal.
God only approves of food consumption if it's part of a legal financial transaction.
Let's not stir that bag of worms...
Fake supply chains for resources (e.g., 'welfare') ruin real supply chains.
What happens when the fake supply chain decides to close shop, or indeed runs out of resources without anybody realizing it? You get catastrophe.
Foreign aid, welfare, subsidies, etc., all force the local market to build itself around fake infrastructure (look at Walmart, where employees make ends meet with food stamps), and the only way to keep that fake infrastructure going is to keep pouring more resources and transferring more authority to the illusion, until it collapses into chaos and horror (see Venezuela, or any other failed empire, such as the USSR, Rome, Egypt, and anything else you could possibly look at).
Of course sales of bananas from other businesses would be impacted if people have a local place to get them for free. And of course consumption/demand would go up if people had the choice of getting one kind of fruit for free, while having to pay for other options. The impact of doing this was/is obvious. The logic also extends to a number of other "free" programs, with similar provable impact.
Private company hands out free healthy snacks to anyone who wants one, paying out of their own pocket, as a community service, and people find something to bitch about.
We have no bananas.
"Although there is no money in Amazon's community banana stands"
That's ridiculous. There's always money in the banana stand.
There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.
Just remember Amazon's bananas.
As in, the plural requires an S. I counted at least two instances of "banana" used as the plural. What else about this report is half-assed and slapdash?
The Quirkz Handbook of Self-Improvement for People Who Are Already Pretty Okay
Knock Knock ...
Who's there???
Banana...
Banana Who...
(insert Zelda joke here)
It appears that Amazon is using their monopoly position in one area of commerce to destroy competitors in another. It's just like Microsoft giving away Internet Explorer!
This exposes all these businesses as pointless money-grabbing middlemen. Fake businesses The banana farrmers still got paid, the banana transportation still got paid (from farm to warehouse to overseas to warehouse to point of distribution). The only people losing out here had no business making money out of banana sales in the first place. Sure, in normal circumstances there would have been a point of sale at Amazon, but I'm sure my point makes some kind of sense to some Fake-obsessed idiot out there.
Bananas...
All:
When I saw the headline of this article I immediately thought of Harry Chapin's song
30,000 pounds of bananas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfFM4Ilt4Rs
Lyrics here:
http://www.metrolyrics.com/30000-pounds-of-bananas-lyrics-harry-chapin.html
Opening stanza:
It was just after dark when the truck started down
The hill that leads into Scranton Pennsylvania.
Carrying thirty thousand pounds of bananas.
Carrying thirty thousand pounds (hit it Big John) of bananas.
Because of Amazon's business practice history, we can safely claim this will be a case of "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" even if the CEO didn't start it that way. They're doing this in areas where Amazon has fresh produce delivery to your door. I'll bet you they will eventually start tying it to their other services and then they'll decide it's too cost prohibitive to give away free ones so they'll start charging. By that time, Amazon will have exclusive business agreements with banana suppliers and no one in the area will be able to complete with them. These fruit stands are creating habits in customers and providing Amazon wonderful data mining opportunities on the best locations to place their upcoming grocery stores. People will already have the habit of going to that location to pickup some fruit, so why not buy your other groceries while you're there.
Thus is just another way to undercut the local stores and push everyone towards Amazon's services. If not, it would have been more efficient and cheaper of them to go to the local grocery stores and told them they'd pay for all their bananas up to $$ if they were given away free. That would reuse existing supply chains and distribution networks without tying up sidewalk space. They could have even decided on something other than bananas or oranges.
I can't wait to see your face when you find out about Google's free lunches. :-D
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
Yeah, it will get a lot harder to "sell" those jobs where you break your back for pennies.
Here, allow me to play the world's tiniest violin for you.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Amazon should instead give out Nutraloaf. It provides most of a person's nutritional needs and no local businesses will complain as few, if any, sell it (although some government agencies also give it away to selected individuals so Amazon might face some competition there if they are not careful when selecting their distribution channels).
Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading
No shit subsidies whack the existing supply chain which may affect local or foreign economies. While the premise of charity and goodwill is a good one there are often consequences that negate the benefits.
When you are able to include "banana landscape" in some published copy you can go home with a smile on your face.
...the bean...
Enough with using "banana" as a plural. It's not "nearby eateries have also stopped selling as many banana as they used to", it's "nearby eateries have also stopped selling as many bananas as they used to".
B - A - N - A - N - A - S