Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Jonathan Ive Says Immigration Vital For UK Firms (bbc.com)

The UK must keep its doors open to top talent from around the world if its technology firms are to thrive, Apple's chief designer has told the BBC. An anonymous reader shares the article: Sir Jonathan Ive, who has just been appointed Chancellor of the Royal College of Art, also said that technology hubs like Silicon Valley had a "tremendous cultural diversity". Some technology firms fear they may lose access to talent after Brexit. "That general principle [on access] is terribly important for creating a context for multiple companies to grow and in a healthy way explore and develop new products and new product types," Sir Jonathan told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Sir Jonathan said the UK had a "fabulous tradition of design education", but that it needed to do more to become a technology hub on a par with Silicon Valley in California, where the likes of Apple, Facebook and Google are based. "I think Silicon Valley has infrastructures to support start-up companies... ranging from technological support through to funding," he said. "And there is the sense that failure isn't irreversible, so very often people will work on an idea, and there isn't the same sense of stigma when one idea and perhaps one company doesn't work out."

71 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Brits and Americans are just way too fucking stupid. WE NEED INDIANS!

    1. Re:Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Another problem is even when an immigrant is a highly skilled person and contributes a lot to the economy they are able to sponsor their adult relatives to come here. So whatever they pay in in taxes gets taken right back out cuz their 65 year old mother is here now too and she is collecting social security and medicare. We are so stupid.

    2. Re:Because... by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      As long as you folks pay billions and billions for worthless intelligence agencies and useless wars, you can afford to give someones 65 year old mother some basic medicare.

    3. Re: Because... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Elderly care is fucking expensive and a decent chunk of any budget. That 65 year old didn't pay taxes for 45 years to pay for it.

  2. Depends on who immigrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Immigration is a great way to bring in top talent, but it requires a merit-based approach to immigration. In the US, it's what H-1B was supposed to do, and would he helpful if it was still used properly. The problem for Europe is that so many of the immigrants are refugees and from other places where terrorists groups are based. By all means, open the borders to highly skilled immigrants who can help to grow the UK's industries. However, there are too many Muslims entering the country from places like Libya, who are entering for the purpose of carrying out attacks. In the present day, Muslims are responsible for a very disproportionate amount of attacks. Let's bring in more skilled immigrants from other parts of the world and greatly reduce the amount of Muslims entering.

    1. Re:Depends on who immigrates by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Domestic Help is there, but it is too expensive, so we must import cheap third world labor in order to "compete".

      This is the real reason they cry for imported labor.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Depends on who immigrates by Barsteward · · Score: 2

      its amazing how people will search for a bargain in the shops then complain that wages are lower - if people paid the real prices for things then better wages will be paid, driving down prices means driving down costs and the largest cost to an employer is the employee. And, the employment market is also a market so people will search out the bargains so its either market economy or a communist one.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    3. Re:Depends on who immigrates by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But then every one's market should consist of the (entire world), not just the technology market. What technology companies have done is the equivalent of complaining that they don't want to shop in any of the stores available to them, so they want the stores to give them prices from over seas. None of us have that flexibility. Therefore it is putting me at odds with my own economy.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re: Depends on who immigrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope, just attending too many Ariana Grande concerts.

      You fucking moron.

    5. Re: Depends on who immigrates by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      There's nothing remotely surprising about anti-leftwing communists. Maybe you should read some Lenin: https://archive.org/details/Le...

  3. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a impartial opinion... no self interest there at all!

  4. Or... by ConaxConax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about Apple trains up some Brits?

    1. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not about training it's about paying 15 cents to the dollar

      or 15 shillings to the quidler or whatever fake money you use

    2. Re:Or... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      According to Slashdot you can't train good engineers and developers, people are just born with an interest that is absolutely essential.

      Or does that only apply to women.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Or... by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's such a silly sentiment. Clearly everybody is as good as anybody else at anything, regardless of how long one person has been doing it or how interested one person is in it. Unless one of the people is an "underrepresented minority", in which case that person is automatically a thousand times better than a despicable white man, but has been kept down by oppressive thumb of the patriarchy.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    4. Re:Or... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, sign me up for the genius class, once you figure out how to teach people to be geniuses.

      Until then, if you want to become world class, your best bet is to work with the best in the world.

      In practical terms, it means if you want a world-building team you don't necessarily have to hunt across the world for every member; but you do want to build it around the most accomplished people you can find, wherever they might be. Then you let them "train up" the talented locals, rather than have ordinary mortals like you or me try to do it.

      American postwar technological supremacy was largely built this way, with refugee talent from WW2 (or in the case of Werner von Braun and his team, Nazis we snatched before the Russians could scoop them up). Some of the Jewish scientists we got from Germany were literally worth more than their weight in gold. It's not that native-born Americans weren't crucial for achieving most of what we did, but they became world class because they had advantages in their colleagues and teachers. Even in the 1970s when I attended MIT, many of the senior professors there were war refugees.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Or... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How about Apple trains up some Brits?

      The type of talent he's talking about is not the type that is internally trained. It's the type that brings external ideas. This is not low cost H1-Bs being talked about here, or idiots pretending to be a Genius at some bar.

  5. The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by geehzer67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With only $250+ billion sitting in offshore accounts, the big brains at apple can't figure out how to train the locals, either in the public school system or in house. Back in the day, HP, IBM, ATT, GE, Ford, blah, blah, blah, did this for pretty much their entire work force. Seemed to work OK post-war through Reagan/Thatcher. I wonder what's changed? /s

    1. Re:The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by computational+super · · Score: 1

      political correctness took over academia

      Not in the college of mathematics and sciences, at least not yet.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re:The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      They don't want to train someone that isn't controlled easily enough.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The next step is to bring any worker in from a low cost, poor nation and pay them a different nation wage in the new nation for a short time.
      "Going posted" (Jul 7th 2016)
      http://www.economist.com/news/...
      "While French workers command high wages under the country’s sectoral labour agreements.. "
      "... contracted in their home countries to work in another European Union country"
      .."“posted workers”"..
      "need only receive the local minimum, under EU law. "

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the big brains at apple can't figure out how to train the locals

      Of course they can "train" locals. But if they "train" people they lose the very thing that they are promoting here: diversity. Sometimes companies need to hire someone they can train their way, sometimes they specifically are looking for someone trained by someone else. Sometimes they are looking for someone specifically trained in another country.

      Knowledge diversity is very powerful.

    5. Re:The stinking rich need welfare too . . . by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Education budgets in the UK have been cut for years now, with the Tories promising a further 7% cut on per-pupil spending. The UK is not the place you look for talent any more.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. When... by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...are these people going to stop pretending it's about talent?

    It's not. It's about cheap, compliant, captive labor.

    Disagree? YOU explain why these so-fucking-smart people need to be trained for six months by the locals they are replacing.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:When... by monkeyxpress · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...are these people going to stop pretending it's about talent?

      It's not. It's about cheap, compliant, captive labor.

      Disagree? YOU explain why these so-fucking-smart people need to be trained for six months by the locals they are replacing.

      This might be the case in the USA, but in the UK the non-EU skilled migrant system is pretty tough to get through. It costs an employer a lot of money so it would be hard to see how anyone could save money doing this, especially with the EU labour pool readily accessible (for now).

      I also find it quite sad that immigration has become all about some sort of global-economic-struggle. I came to the UK from NZ simply because I wanted to travel and experience new things. Frankly, since sterling crashed after the GFC my income in NZ would be higher than here (and my house would certainly be much nicer), so I'm certainly not hear for the economics. Many more British citizens go back the other way to enjoy a quieter pace of life and for me each country offers a very different experience and I think it is great that brits want to go enjoy living in NZ.

      I don't deny that immigration can be used to suppress local wages, but for many young people it is fundamentally just part of experiencing all that the world has to offer. Life is short. Who would want to hole up in their backyard until they die?

    2. Re: When... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And don't be a disenguenous shill, Shill.

    3. Re:When... by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Well, they've been telling us for decades to keep our heads down and our mouths shut because if we get out of line, they'll offshore the lot of us, and we're lucky we even have a job, so smile and enjoy your Saturdays in the office. Now they're saying that they need to import more people from overseas to work onshore because... offshore doesn't work? Yeah, something fishy is going on here.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    4. Re: When... by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I agree. Why do they need a 6 month training session. When I start jobs I'm basically thrown in and left alone.

    5. Re:When... by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Better get Elon Musk kicked out of the USA then, he's a damn immigrant

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    6. Re:When... by segedunum · · Score: 1

      This might be the case in the USA, but in the UK the non-EU skilled migrant system is pretty tough to get through.

      EU passports are like arseholes. Everyone has got one ;-).

    7. Re:When... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC If a company has to fly a person into the UK, look after their family, ensure housing and schooling, then add in that "training" cost something is not adding up.
      An exceptional artist or creative person that appears once in a generation in a few nations might be worth all that effort.
      To bring in average workers who need a company to slow down, divert their own expert staff to help bring the new staff up to some average skill level and then only have average workers after all that spending and time does not add up.
      A lot of average locals could be trained in the same average skills. The UK educational system is not lacking in maths and science on average.
      Why spend company funds and expert divert staff to look after people from around the world to take very average jobs any local person could be helped to fill?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:When... by hey! · · Score: 1

      If it were about talent, then you'd reduce the number who come in on the visa, and also reduce the number that are kicked out by the visa retiring. It makes *no* sense to kick someone out who you brought in for his talent when you say you have a shortage of talent.

      Really, it's just a program to facilitate offshoring.

      Now I've worked with a number of H-1Bs, and some of them really are very talented and skilled, and bring a lot of value to the country. But others have pretty much rudimentary, commodity skills and don't do anything for the country but reduce wages for our own mediocre workers.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re: When... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Indentured servants are really good at saying "yes sir!". That's pretty important when you're an inbred halfwit MBA whose entire career is based on nepotism.

    10. Re:When... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ...are these people going to stop pretending it's about talent?

      As soon as you stop conflating "foreign talent" with "H1-B outsourcing".

      There are two different types of foreigners. But keep putting them together, you're only contributing to the brain drain of America.

    11. Re: When... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      "I don't like what you said so I'll call you a shill" - You an anti-vaxxer or something?

      The UK will slow immigration to near-nothing, I fervently hope. It will fuck their economy up, which is both deserved and expected.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    12. Re:When... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well unfortunately the law doesn't stipulate that. For H-1Bs it means that there isn't an American that can do the job, well if you have to train your replacement who is an H-1B then the company is violating the fucking law as there is clearly an American that can do the fucking job. So now who is begin willfully stupid.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    13. Re:When... by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      It's not. It's about cheap, compliant, captive labor.

      I think of myself as political left and pro immigration and what not. But you are a 100% right here.

  7. I'm sick of this shit. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple loves to tell everyone how to run their society but then they go and dodge taxes which are a fundamental underpinning of any modern society. I think Apple needs to pay up or shut the fuck up.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But how can society survive without their shiny shiny?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ...but then they go and dodge taxes which are a fundamental underpinning of any modern society.

      Yes indeed, dodging taxes has become the fundamental underpinnings of any modern society.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Apple is making excellent business. And it does so with high-level government support. Maybe you voted for the wrong people?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Apple loves to tell everyone how to run their society but then they go and dodge taxes which are a fundamental underpinning of any modern society.

      When you say "dodge taxes", you are implying that they are doing something illegal not paying taxes.

      If that were the case, then I'd think they'd be under many a lawsuit.

      If they are following the law to keep their money from the tax man (like any sane person or company would do)....then there's not problem.

      If you don't like the tax laws, change them...but don't blame an entity from saving as much as legally possible via the current tax laws.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      If they are following the law to keep their money from the tax man (like any sane person or company would do)....then there's not problem.

      Spoken like a true sociopath.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re:I'm sick of this shit. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Apple loves to tell everyone how to run their society but then they go and dodge taxes which are a fundamental underpinning of any modern society. I think Apple needs to pay up or shut the fuck up.

      Maybe you should complain to your local government for writing tax laws that allow them to do just that.

    7. Re: I'm sick of this shit. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, brother, can you spare a couple hundred million dollars? I need to change some badlaws, but it seems I've lost my wallet and can't afford to buy even one congressman, much less a judge.

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:Hey, you! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Don't like it? Don't buy it.

    I don't want a computer with soldered RAM either. But I'm not bothered by it, because I don't buy Apples.

  10. Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to be in favor more more lax immigration laws, but now I've changed course and decided that all immigration needs to be cut off completely, thanks to Jonathan Ive. Since he's come out publicly in favor of immigration, and I utterly despise his work, I'll now be forced to vote against politicians who are pro-immigration. Good job, Johnny.

    Seriously, though, these corporate fools really should just shut their mouths, because they likely don't help build public support for their positions when they blab their personal opinions so publicly, and can even hurt their companies. How many people stopped buying from various companies like Barilla when their egotistical CEOs publicly proclaimed their opposition to gay marriage, for instance? How many people stopped shopping at Hobby Lobby when they outed themselves as Christian crusaders against contraceptives for their employees?

    1. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Why should health insurance pay for birth control? Serious question.

    2. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      1. Because it's a whole lot cheaper than paying for a hospital delivery, and then for health care for a kid.

      2. Because we as a society decided that that should be part of regular healthcare, just like other preventive measures like regular GP visits, and nonsensical religious reasons aren't sufficient to deny this to people who aren't of your religion. If you don't like it, then don't hire employees, or lobby instead for single-payer healthcare so the government is paying for it instead of the employer. Or just not have health insurance as an employee benefit, and limit yourself to only part-time employees.

    3. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense at all. "Rights" only exist in a practical sense when there's a government that can actually enforce those rights, or at least not punish you for exercising them according to its laws. Government control does not extend over those imaginary lines. If you want to lobby for a single planetary government, you can do that (assuming the government in your jurisdiction grants you that right), but until then, rights are different from country to country whether you like it or not.

      Finally, why are people arguing with me about immigration or health insurance here? Some people here are so dense; the first paragraph was sheer satire, leading to the main point, which was about CEOs making unnecessary public statements.

    4. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      1. Because it's a whole lot cheaper than paying for a hospital delivery, and then for health care for a kid.

      I don't disagree, but interesting point is that they refused to pay a dime for my vasectomy. I tried the same logic.

      Interesting that Obamacare didn't change that. Now, why would that be?

    5. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're a real sorry sack of shit, aren't you? Women always go to hospitals or at least have some kind of medical help during a delivery because complications aren't that rare and are unpredictable. Make sure you tell women your views about this stuff on the first date so they know what you really think.

    6. Re:Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing because the GOP would have objected loudly, since they don't believe in sterilization. Contraceptives at least are pretty easily reversed: just stop taking or using them. Procedures like vasectomies and tubal ligations require surgery to reverse, and have a significant rate of failure (with the reversing part).

  11. Why does Jonathan Ive hate Britons? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    He only "supports immigration" as long as it provides a steady stream of desperate, captive, fly-by-night labor.
    He doesn't support it when it provides people that want to become hard-working citizens that assimilate in a new country.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  12. The environmentalists took the latter. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Given the push for lynching anyone that dares question AGW, I'd say that political correctness has taken over many parts of the sciences.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  13. Re:Because we can't be bothered to train by gweihir · · Score: 1

    And another AC that does not even have a basic understanding of what is going on. Talk about Dunning-Kruger. The fact of the matter is that a modern industrial country at this time needs significantly more talented people that its population can supply. Thi sis not a question of "training". If the potential is not there, no amount of training will fix that.

    The US and UK used to understand that, and they had a hiring advantage because many people globally learn English. But in many European countries you now run into pretty top-notch IT teams that also have English as a team language, because they come from all over the globe and hence that advantage is lost. Now, making immigration difficult will give you even less of that limited pool and that will long-term kill any competitive advantage you have. May take 10 or 20 years to become obvious, but what we see is an act of self-destruction, fueled by arrogance, stupidity and xenophobia. Of course, the UK is also going into Fascism at this time (apparently they do not believe the experiences others made with it and what to try it out themselves), so it will be hard to divide the reasons for coming economic catastrophe there apart afterwards.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  14. Re: Oh don't worry, UK will be picky with immigran by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Wait until the economy tanks. They'll all fuck off to Lavaturia and Rumentia to pick fruit and wipe fat old bastards' arses.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. A small price to pay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because washing pieces of little girls out of your hair is a small price to pay for more immigration!

  16. How about supporting the UK? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Telling schools what employment skills the other nations schools "teach" students so UK students can have the same advantages?
    Tell UK universities what they are missing every year that makes some graduate from another nation so vital for a company every decade?
    What is the UK lacking that poor nations with no funding can do so well every decade that no school or university in the UK can do?
    The UK has had decades of the best teaching staff to educate teachers, the best teachers for its schools and universities, the language skills are equal, good health care, good nutrition, clean water, no national service issues to remove a section of a population from quality education.
    UK students would have the same testing averages as most over advance nations ranging from the best in the world to average.
    Nothing is really holding back UK education on average every decade. People graduate in the UK at a good rate every decade with merit based course work.
    Workers in the UK should graduate from school and university with all the skills to fill any job in the UK. The UK has the ability to support its own people from vocational to very advanced university vocations.

    Is the UK lacking in math teaching? Engineering? Computer experts? When does the average person in the UK not gain the needed skills or fail to graduate?
    The UK pushed a lot of advanced networked computer hardware and quality educational programming languages into all its schools, giving some computer access per student going back to the 1980's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Something other nations could not afford to do.
    Thats generations of computer and math course work for most UK students other nations could never afford on average.

    What did UK education system so lack every decade that very average poor nations workers now have skills to "bring" to the UK?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:How about supporting the UK? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except this isn't about anyone lacking anything other than educational diversity.

      The only thing here to fix is exchange programs that allow UK people to actually get trained overseas in other ways. The people in the UK aren't dumb or poorly trained. They aren't lacking education.

      However companies that employ only locals trained only in one way end up with a very key weakness: a monoculture without any technical diversity. I say this as someone who beat a far more educated and more qualified person local at my last job interview only because the last place I worked at was Australia and the company wanted to draw on my experience of how things are done elsewhere.

    2. Re:How about supporting the UK? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not just "poor nations", a lot of immigration is from other first world countries with much better educations systems than the UK. The UK isn't ranked all that highly in global terms... And there are just not enough graduates to meet demand. Plus, sometimes immigrants have skills, e.g. language, that it is very hard to find in the UK. How many electrical engineers who can speak fluent Mandarin or German do you think are in the job market right now?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:How about supporting the UK? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "The UK isn't ranked all that highly in global terms" what is the UK missing out on then?
      The language issue is not that complex. A lot of people in the UK got exposed to rather good language lessons over the decades.
      The UK was able to translate most of the German Enigma material in ww2 into English without too much trouble.
      The UK used Hong Kong to intercept a lot of material from China and again found it had skilled translators to work on the material collected over decades.
      Complex French and East/West German mil/gov/embassy translations did not slow the UK down in the 1950's-80's
      The UK was evan able to spare some help for the US with Korean translations in the 1950's.
      The UK seemed to always have the ability to find enough arts students to do translation work and still export very advanced products and services to the world.
      The examples are before "computers" could help a lot so real skilled humans in the UK would have to be trusted and found to do complex and technical gov/mil grade translations.
      If the Uk government could find the staff it needed over many decades with its low wages and working conditions, the UK private sector could too.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Re: Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration no by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    I think he was just trying to make a point that, to be successful, the struggle of workers against capitalist exploitation must be international.

  18. yeah yeah yeah by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    But most of those people we get have no qualifications, and those who have qualifications, are screened and accepted into the US or Canada.

  19. Ayep! by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    technology hubs like Silicon Valley had a "tremendous cultural diversity".

    Tremendous cultural diversity = women, gays and asians... and don't forget the eclectic white men! Burning Man attendees, that's another culture right?

    Not many blacks + hispanics tho... they must be underrepresented in California.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  20. Re: Hey, you! by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Then you're a complete asshole for replying. Fucking useless.

  21. Re: Hey, you! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Wow, you're stupid, aren't you? If you don't like the products a company is selling, then don't buy them, it's that simple. Apples are luxury products, and you don't need them in any way; there's plenty of competition. If you don't like soldered RAM, go buy something else that doesn't have that. There's no shortage of computers out there with non-soldered RAM.

    Fucking stupid.

  22. Re: Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration no by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You can try to coordinate some actions across national boundaries, but legal jurisdictions necessarily stop at those boundaries, so you can't just ignore them and call them "imaginary lines". Armed government enforcers do enforce laws within those lines, so while those lines may be man-made, they do really exist.

  23. Re: Well, I guess I have to be anti-immigration no by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Yup. No disagreement.

  24. St Theresa says... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I doubt Eton's or Harrow's budgets have been cut. And they're what matters, not the grubby oiks from Barnsley who would only grow up to be chavs anyway.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."