Slashdot Mirror


British Airways CEO Won't Resign, Says Outsourcing Not To Blame For IT Failure (bbc.com)

British Airways CEO Alex Cruz insisted he would not resign on Monday as he sought to draw a line under three days of chaos at the UK flag carrier after IT problems left tens of thousands of passenger stranded. In an interview -- the first since a global computer outage all but shut the airline down -- Cruz said he doesn't think "it would make much of use for me to resign." Separately, he also denied an outsourcing deal was to blame for the IT problems that hit on Saturday, causing the airline to cancel almost all its services over the weekend. From a report: A leaked staff email revealed Mr Cruz had told staff not to comment on the system failure. When asked about the email he told the BBC the tone was clear: "Stop moaning and come and help us." The airline is now close to full operational capacity after the problems resulted in mass flight cancellations at Heathrow and Gatwick over the bank holiday weekend. Questions remain about how a power problem could have had such impact, said the BBC's technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones. One theory was that returning systems were unusable as the data had become unsynchronised. [...] Cruz told the BBC a power surge, had "only lasted a few minutes," but the back-up system had not worked properly. He said the IT failure was not due to technical staff being outsourced from the UK to India.

53 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Capitalism is at fault by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 2, Funny

    We need communism now!

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
    1. Re:Capitalism is at fault by unixisc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Venezuela's really working out well! As is North Korea

    2. Re:Capitalism is at fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The same communism that failed everywhere it's been tried? Good idea.

      I'd rather the Spanish Inquisition return.

    3. Re:Capitalism is at fault by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you use the "A is bad, hence B must be good" fallacy to make your point for A, you look about as stupid as someone who tries to use it as a point for B.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Capitalism is at fault by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Go to any Muslim country, you'll get your wish. The ex Soviet 'stans' may be an exception.

    5. Re:Capitalism is at fault by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both do not have a communist economy. However, Venezuela is struggling today under a leader who has problems with democracy and North Korea is owned by Kim Jon Un and his useless clan. Communism is an economic model where in essence everything is owned by everyone, money does not exist and people are sharing things. While this concept is totally utopian it has also nothing to do with any country which claimed to be communist. However, countries like the the German Democratic Republic or the Democratic Republic of Kongo were/are both named democratic, but they were both dictatorships.

      Also "communism now" was mentioned as a joke.

    6. Re:Capitalism is at fault by DeBaas · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still think it was BA who was bad here

      --
      ---
    7. Re:Capitalism is at fault by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Power failures happen. Hacks happen. It is the way you handle them that matters. BA's behavior was horrible. They should have had a fall-back paper based system. It would have been slow, error prone, and required them to rush-hire a lot of temps, but they could have muddled through without stranding tens of thousands of people. Also, it would have saved them money. The cost of the paper-pushing temps would have been far less than the cost of all the refunds for cancelled flights.

    8. Re:Capitalism is at fault by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Um, no. This is an interesting fallacy that I see all of the time - 'go back to paper'. Let's face it - the ONLY way you can run a modern airline, hospital, utility or whatnot is with a computerized system. When it goes tits up, you go tits up until you can get backups on line. Just finding the requisite paper products (and manual credit card imprinters - I'm going to bet that half the BA employees have never even seen one) could take days.

      Can you imagine trying to hire and train 5000 temps to fill out complicated forms while the rest of the staff has complete meltdowns?

      Fat chance.

      Now, BA should have been able to handle anything short of force majour with backups and redundant systems. The power supply theory is laughable. But paper isn't going to solve the problems on any sort of reasonable time scale.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Capitalism is at fault by rl117 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Businesses can and do have contingency plans to work without computers. It's absolutely possible with a little foresight and planning. I used to work in an industrial complex which was highly automated. But for every bit of process, there was an accompanying card with all the details filled out in ink. The card would be physically passed around the plant to hand over responsibility and document every part of the process. For each place the card passed through, local log books would record every addition to the card, and they details would also be entered into the computer. You might think this redundant, but it provided three important things: (1) audit - we could check that the computer details matched the card and that the local logs matched the card and the computer, to trace any discrepancies in the case of entry errors (2) physical accountability and traceability and (3) the ability to run the entire plant without any network connectivity; the details of the processes could be entered retrospectively. An airline can certainly mitigate a lot of what went wrong. Physically print out the passenger lists to permit check in and boarding. Most people book the flights well in advance; you can cope with most passengers with ease, even moving them between flights, if you have a backup paper system in place. Physically cross them off with the date and time you did it, then add them to a list that the gate staff can use. Card payment isn't an issue--most people already paid in advance; for those that didn't you can probably take the payment, physically document it and enter it into the system at a later time. It's absolutely doable, and any company who cares about surviving should have a system in place. The plant I worked at did this for legal and financial reasons. If a computer outage costs millions of pounds an hour, then you make sure it's covered. BA's outage likely cost much more than that.

    10. Re:Capitalism is at fault by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is an interesting fallacy that I see all of the time - 'go back to paper'. Let's face it - the ONLY way you can run a modern airline, hospital, utility or whatnot is with a computerized system.

      There is a modern airline - Air France I think, that does just this. Their systems fail often, but they have a robust paper system to keep people from being stranded.

      Thing is, you don't to allow people to buy new tickets in order to function. Lots of what a modern airline does can just be ignored. You need to verify tickets and boarding passes - which can be done by straining the phone network back to a central office with lots of temp workers, and you need to keep aircraft inspection/maintenance logs current, but that's still mostly paper anyhow.

      You can make very complex systems work without computers if you care enough to do so. You can also make disaster recovery systems that actually work when you need them - though you do need to follow the expensive advice of professionals, so maybe some corporations are culturally incapable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Capitalism is at fault by aix+tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Businesses can and do have contingency plans to work without computers. It's absolutely possible with a little foresight and planning.

      Foresight, planning *and* training. I work for a Retailer with about 20 branches. What we do, we disconnect every branch from central IT once a year for a day (granted, on one of the slower days), so that they know how to handle the backup procedures.

    12. Re:Capitalism is at fault by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To blame Venezuela's problems on oil is to ignore the incredible mismanagement going on in the country. Price controls as a method of controlling the economy were discredited decades ago, and cause shortages. That is one reason Venezuela is having trouble. Another is because they close down any business that is doing well.....for example, if a grocery store is full of food, they close it down because obviously the store was hoarding food, keeping it from the people. Another reason is because they nationalized the oil, and they didn't really know how to run oil wells, so their production dropped. And yes, the price of oil dropped, which has hurt them (but it's hurt Norway and Russia too, and neither one is having the troubles of Venezuela). You can also add corruption: the daughter of Hugo Chavez is the richest person in Venezuela.

      Venezuela's problem have nothing to do with socialism: it's poor mismanagement in so many areas of government.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Capitalism is at fault by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      How much fuel do you put on the plane and in which tanks? Is it due for any inspections? Did it throw a code last flight? 'Ready to fly' is an assumption.

      You could print it all at the start of a shift, but you know they didn't. It wouldn't be 100% anyhow, gates change, shit happens.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Capitalism is at fault by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Venezuela is struggling today because its economy is based on oil, and oil prices are low.

      Absolute rubbish. Venezuela was in trouble at $100/bbl. Has been in trouble since Chavez, but Chavez was better at keeping his house in order. I'm sure Maduro would like to blame oil prices but the real problem is his corrupt out of control government. But I'm sure he and his buddies eat very well.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Capitalism is at fault by aberglas · · Score: 2

      You actually don't even need to verify tickets. In an emergency like this just ask people and believe them, most will be honest. It is not that difficult to calculate fuel by hand. Weather is available. Rosters are worked out in advance, so people just turn up. It should all muddle along without computers for at least a few days.

      The trouble is that the systems were made very complex *because* of computers, and then nobody understands them any more.

  2. What happened to identifying the source of error? by Quakeulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember when people would say that "X happened in Y with outcome Z", but here we don't get to know anything of what went wrong?

    Not telling me in detail means I am highly unlikely to fly with them as they are seen as untrustworthy with something to hide.

  3. Country of origin isn't the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having a foreign IT staff isn't the issue, having an incompetent IT staff that is not able to manage the system and deal with issues like this is. If you are firing people who are able to do this and bringing in people who are barely able to hold stuff together because it lowers the salaries you pay then it is your own fault.

    1. Re:Country of origin isn't the issue by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      “It's unwise to pay too much, but it's worse to pay too little. When
      you pay too much, you lose a little money - that's all. When you pay
      too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you
      bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The
      common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a
      lot - it can't be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well
      to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will
      have enough to pay for something better.”

        John Ruskin

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Country of origin isn't the issue by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not so much about incompetent staff, its about the loss of institutional knowledge when you outsource.

      The company built up a large internal IT team for a reason - the IT problems of an airline are complex and convoluted (airlines often cant actually predict what price your ticket is going to be because of the complexity in the ticketing and fare based systems... and that complexity has snuck in over the 60 years of the boom in commercial aviation).

      When you then get rid of that internal IT team, a huge sea of knowledge walks out with it. Yes, you can have them document the system, but no level of documentation makes up for practical experience that allows you to give a gut reaction in a given circumstance.

      And thats what happened here. The root cause might not be anyones fault - but the recovery time might have been minutes to hours if the company still had that internal institutional knowledge to run with. They didn't, and the outsourced IT team had to troubleshoot the system from first principles - which can take forever.

      Now watch BA switch outsourcing contractors again, citing their failure - and watch the knowledge gained via this incident once again take a walk out of the door.

    3. Re:Country of origin isn't the issue by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spot on. While it is usually a good idea to outsource non-core functions, IT has become a core function for almost all large businesses. If you do not have control over your IT with an organic (n.b. not the health food organic) workforce, you do not have control over your business.

      I would assert that outsourcing IT only makes sense for a small business (e.g. a doctor's office, family restaurant).

    4. Re:Country of origin isn't the issue by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      on the other hand it is a commodity. you dont want to define your business in such a way that your core business includes so.e irrelevant commodity.

      But that's the point. It's not irrelevant, it's actually the core of your business. And it's not a commodity, it's unique and irreplaceable knowledge of how your business works.

  4. Re:Spanish Inquisition by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be careful. You might get what you wish for. With all the scary anti-privacy laws, the UK is definitely heading in the "right" direction.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  5. Re:So in house? by AC5398 · · Score: 2

    He's just admitted that rabid cost-cutting measures were responsible for the outage, and said cost-cutting measures were his fault, it just wasn't outsourcing that was to blame.

    Either BA didn't update mission-critical infrastructure that is long past its expiry date, or they ignored the needs of mission-critical infrastructure (which includes having well-trained operators who know what to do when 'things get out of sync'. So it is still his *&^% fault.

  6. Phrasing by OpenSourced · · Score: 2

    I don't think that it would make much of use for me, to resign.

    There, fixed that for you. Commas are important.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  7. Bad Backup? by minstrelmike · · Score: 2

    The backup didn't work. Wow. Who woulda thunk? I suspect some IT person complained about the backup procedures being inadequate and he was probably fired. Someone else asked if they could actually test the backup and they were given a demotion.

    And now that the backup failed to actually be a backup, we're all shocked and surprised (and it's definitiley not management's fault).

    I tested my backups daily by importing the data into a different database. (Of couse, I'm an Oracle admin and am used to having failed backups).

    1. Re:Bad Backup? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think generally backups are badly managed. I don't think most management sees them as all that critical. I suspect admins likely get tired of trying and just go with the flow after awhile.

      In all my years professionally I've only ever really needed enterprise backup (i.e. not my desktop etc...) twice (Oracle DB). Both times it was useless. The first was a scheduling issue where the last backup that was done was 9 months old which is really unacceptable. In that case we had to use some complicated data harvesting from log tables (which fortunately we had in this instance), though some data was lots due to format differences. The second time apparently the backup process was broken, and it was under maintenance to fix it, for a month, but no one decided that it might be a good idea to tell anyone, so when we deployed a new version of an application into production which caused a number of data issues, the last good backup was 3 weeks old, meaning we had to get creative with the existing data and live with the rest putting it on users to manual confirm a couple weeks worth of possible changes.

      Anyway from my own experience whenever it's been needed, it's not there. Personally I think I am way more fastidious about my backups, but there seems to be a thing about corporate culture, and perhaps the idea of risk management and passing blame and responsibility off on somebody else..

    2. Re:Bad Backup? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      We had a fire. Burnt the whole place down. Fortunately, we had backups on tape, and we'd tested the backups using the tape drive, to make sure that they extracted correctly.

      Trouble was, the only tape drive that seemed to be able to extract the tapes, was melted in the fire. Other tape drives appeared unable to do so, due to some subtle misalignment of the tape drive itself. Luckily, the data turned out to be available in other places, and our (frankly, pretty great) IT guys had us back up in a couple of days.

  8. An open letter to BA upper management by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear British Airways Upper Management,

    This is your fault. To avoid another incident, you will bring in the operations IT managers, who are quite frankly, much smarter than you. Then sit down and shut the fuck up and listen to the solutions that these managers already know about, and which will easily fix the problem.

    It would be best if all fools, MBAs, accountants and other technical illiterates were excluded from that meeting. A lawyer or too, on the other hand, may be quite helpful.

    Hint. The solutions cost money. Guess why they were never implemented. Bonus question! Guess how expensive an unplanned failure is going to be.

    Cheers!

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:An open letter to BA upper management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      Guess how expensive an unplanned failure is going to be.

      They no longer need to guess.

    2. Re:An open letter to BA upper management by Cederic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Early estimates peg this at a fraction of a percent of yearly net profit

      The numbers I've seen quoted are closer to 10% of their annual profit.

      That's not a trivial sum.

  9. Re: So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The food on their flights is terrible even by airline standards"

    They are just trying to give an authentic British food experience!

  10. Re: So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slightly reduced bonus? He confirmed the issue was not his fault, and not that of the new guys maintaining the system... It was obviously an issue of the old people who didn't properly train or leave adequate documentation of the intricacies of the system when they left 5 months ago. If anything, an extra large bonus should be coming for getting rid of that level of incompetence.

    --
    Thirty four characters live here.
  11. Re:Should be renamed Indian Airways by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    It would already be enough if their CEO has to personally pay for the blunder, and you'll see them replace cheap code chimps with sensible IT staff pretty fucking quickly.

    CEOs don't give a shit about anything as long as it doesn't cut into their bottom line. And I mean their personal one, not the one of the company they are allegedly responsible for.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Re:What happened to identifying the source of erro by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, first, Something Bad happened. Then, everybody tried to figure out What Went Wrong, but nobody could, because anybody who could find their ass with both hands had been laid off and their jobs outsourced to a faraway land where everything has to be microscopically explained, perhaps starting with "Well, hydrogen is one proton and one electron" and build from there. Then, The Suits started screaming for blood, but nobody they were screaming at was even competent enough to come up with a cogent response beyond "We're looking into it". Then, the Uber-PHB said "It's not because we shipped all our jobs to the lowest bidder, and It's Not My Fault".

    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" -- or a combination of stupidity and greed.

  13. Re:Can someone explaing to me by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I can't explain is why he is STILL the CEO.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Pull The Other One by segedunum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cruz thinks he can get people to pay BA prices while slashing costs back beyond budget airline levels. He had form on this with Iberia. Meals cut, added extras cut on long haul flights, crew on zero hour contracts who aren't being paid with cancelled flights and all the IT staff within Britain being fired. No staff give a shit, and why should they?

    Fuck you Alex. I hope this kills BA off.

    1. Re:Pull The Other One by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I often recall this piece of sagely advice from guitarist Robert Fripp, talking to author Tony Bacon:

      TB: What advice would you give a young musician?
      RF: Never fly Air Iberia.
      TB: No, seriously.
      RF: Seriously. Never ever fly Air Iberia.

  15. Please do the needful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please do the needful and let me put my point.

    Time to resign.

    Oh, and insource. Your data is your most precious resource.

  16. Re:So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    with a CEO like Alex Cruz

    Ted's evil twin, separated at birth?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. Re:What happened to identifying the source of erro by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

    I still insist that everybody has that backwards

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  18. Re:So in house? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The *failure* wasnt a fault of the outsourcing - the problematic *recovery* almost certainly is a fault of the outsourcing. His statement doesnt cover both of those...

  19. Re: Can someone explaing to me by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it wasn't a single supply, but rather a series of failures over the last 6 months which never got fixed.... and then the last one failed as well.

    Or some forgot to plug in the monitoring cables for the redundant power supplies? I worked at a company where a hallway suddenly smelled like an open sewer for several weeks. What made it mysterious was that no sewer line went through that part of the building, leaving the building owner and plumber puzzled about the source. The smell came from leaking batteries inside a redundant UPS in the network closet on the other side of the wall. Since the monitoring cable wasn't plugged in, the one-man IT department didn't know that the UPS stopped working a long time ago.

  20. Re:So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

    I'll take the bait... Do you imagine that Ted is the good twin, or that they are identical evil twins?

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  21. Governance failure by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

    He is right that "Outsourcing Not To Blame".

    Power might of well have been the trigger, but the scale of the outage indicates much bigger problems afoot. The root cause of this turning out to be poor IT Governance, those big picture processes that prove the resilience is designed in, tested and proven. That is a failure of IT management.

    IT treated as a cost centre, everything is outsourced on a lowest cost basis. Those suppliers are further whipped into line by crude metrics by managers that got a leg up by doing things quickly or cheaply, not properly. I see this kind of lack of concern for proper governance every day, address this lack of proper governance is by far the most difficult challenger I face as a consultant working in QA.

    The NHS failure was exactly the same thing, the attack was the trigger, the root cause of the collapse of IT was governance failure by very senior management failure to ensure resilience was built in and proven.

  22. Evaluation Problem - double handicap by FeelGood314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IT is hard and how it works is invisible to those who don't understand it. BA might be screwed. Not only have they outsourced IT but it looks like they don't have the expertise anymore to even evaluate the quality of their IT or even prioritize and fund what their IT should be doing. So now not only is BA not good at IT they are doubly handicapped in that at least from their CEOs statements they can't even evaluate IT.

  23. Re:What happened to identifying the source of erro by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, there's incompetence here, but it's not the India that's the problem.

    In my experience India has an incredible number of talented, capable people, but like talented capable people everywhere they cost more than ignoramuses. But even a country of a billion people has a finite pool of top-notch talent. On the other hand India does have an almost limitless supply of subpar talent, and Indian businessmen are enterprising to a fault. If a Western CEO jis willing to shell out good money for sub-par people, there's a killing to be made.

    So who, exactly, is the fool in this scenario?

    The British Airways debacle was an instance of a catastrophic failure being brought on by an unusually but statistically predictable event. Therefore, the new vendor the CEO brought in wasn't up to the job he hired them for. That's the CEO's fault, end of story.

    The real problem is that people who are good at IT operations make their job look too easy. A fool looking at the lack of drama in a well-run data center is apt to mistake that for the job being easy.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  24. Back in the day at BA... by Dr_Ish · · Score: 2

    In the 1980s, I interviewed for an entry level graduate position with BA, to work with their IT systems. Their people were arrogant and ignorant. When I asked them what languages their systems were written in, the HR droids had no clue. I never got a call back and I am very glad about that. Although the corporate culture has probably changed many times since then, it seems that their attitudes have not improved any. The fact that the head honcho will not take responsibility now is no surprise. I bet he will keep on taking his over-inflated salary and bonuses though.

  25. Re:So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    My absolute worst travel experiences have also been with British Air.

    Fundamentally, what I don't like about them is that if you're rich and don't deviate even slightly from proper British behavior (drinking your tea with the proper pinkie elevation, etc) then they'll try to treat you pretty well. But if you need any kind of accommodation at all or, even worse, if you're not rich, they will go out of their way to make your life as miserable as absolutely possible.

    If possible, I fly Japan Air. But these days they're in high demand to their general reputation for good customer service (even to people who aren't rich or need a little extra help). So it's hard to find available flights.

    And British Air is the one airline that I go far out of my way to avoid.

    Indeed, Japan Airlines is excellent! A few more I feel comfortable to recommend, are Finnair, THAI, and... the machmachine itself, Lufthansa. Lufthansa specifically does everything better where BA fails miserably, and yet they are a similar type of airline. Even Lufthansa's hubs (Frankfurt and Munich) function flawlessly and aren't a total hell, like Heathrow.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  26. Re:So the CEO says he "won't resign" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    No, bad IT people get paid 50000$ a year at age 47 while their peers are married with children, make 6-10 times that wage, and don't feel the need to fabricate a life on Slashdot.

    That's too funny. My sysadmin peers on a nation-wide government IT project make $50K+ per year (engineers get $80K+ per year), most are ex-military and married with children, and none of have ever heard of Slashdot. And everyone has 20+ years of IT experience.

  27. Re: So glad I never use BA - (the Sucky Airline). by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Little known fact: "keep calm and carry on" is actually originated as a phrase to tell people when they find out what's in black pudding.
    "Keep a stiff upper lip" is the term of endurance you have to make when the figgy pudding hits your stomach. urghhs.

    It's so bad that half of the British national dish, fish and chips, wasn't even invented in England it was invented in France, and the fish part was brought to England by Sephardic Jews.

    The main reason the British had to let India into the commonwealth, was because otherwise they would have no good restaurants in London.

    I went off a bit there, did I? But if you can find some nice maple syrup freshly dripped from a tree.......now there you have something good.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  28. Re:So the CEO says he "won't resign" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    If you have money issues, you think food and shelter, out of work for two years, etc.

    I'm actually at the self-actualization level of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. By living a modest lifestyle, I can focus on who I want to be and not on what everything think I should be.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs#Self-actualization

  29. Re:So the CEO says he "won't resign" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Besides the fact that you are wasting your time, and can simply get an Arduino and blow away anything you could make from TTL chips?

    When I learned electronics in the early 1990's, you couldn't simply dropped in a microcontroler and program your way out of it. (An FPGA was a bit different but I never got far enough in electronics to use that.) I was surprised how much of the old electronic theory came back when I started building circuits again. Maybe some day I'll get around to building a Z80 computer from scratch.