Slashdot Mirror


India's Ethical Hackers Rewarded Abroad, Ignored at Home (yahoo.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: Kanishk Sajnani did not receive so much as a thank you from a major Indian airline when he contacted them with alarming news -- he had hacked their website and could book flights anywhere in the world for free. It was a familiar tale for India's army of "ethical hackers," who earn millions protecting foreign corporations and global tech giants from cyber attacks but are largely ignored at home, their skills and altruism misunderstood or distrusted. India produces more ethical hackers -- those who break into computer networks to expose, rather than exploit, weaknesses -- than anywhere else in the world. The latest data from BugCrowd, a global hacking network, showed Indians raked in the most "bug bounties" -- rewards for red-flagging security loopholes. Facebook, which has long tapped hacker talent, paid more to Indian researchers in the first half of 2016 than any other researchers. Indians outnumbered all other bug hunters on HackerOne, another registry of around 100,000 hackers. One anonymous Indian hacker -- "Geekboy" -- has found more than 700 vulnerabilities for companies like Yahoo, Uber and Rockstar Games. Most are young "techies" -- software engineers swelling the ranks of India's $154-billion IT outsourcing sector whose skill set makes them uniquely gifted at cracking cyber systems.

82 comments

  1. That is not what "ethical hacker" means by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An "ethical hacker" will only break in if given permission, either directly or via a bug-bounty program. Anybody hacking without a mandate is either grey-hat (if they do inform the target and do not try to extort them) or outright black-hat. That companies do not react friendly to people hacking them _without_ a mandate is not a surprise, as that happens to be a criminal act.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, an ethical hacker will not start with insider information. I suspect a proportion of these are workers at outsourcing companies who are frustrated at the quality of code their organizations are shipping.

    2. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      Also, an ethical hacker will not start with insider information. I suspect a proportion of these are workers at outsourcing companies who are frustrated at the quality of code their organizations are shipping.

      That's not necessarily the case at all; white box hacking starts with /all/ information available.

    3. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      no, I bet there are plenty of bumbling IT guys asleep at the switch that let the systems they are supposed to be on their toes competently managing their systems and are in desperate need of a wakeup call

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    4. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > contractor
      k

    5. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or bumbling IT managers. It took several years of petitioning our development manager to approve an iteration to replace the plaintext password management in our legacy software systems. He only agreed after his own account got hacked at Adobe.

    6. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by XparXnoiaX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ethical and illegal are two very different things. An ethical person will do illegal things, if they are the right thing (like Snowden. Super illegal). Don't let the illegality of it confuse you. What they are doing is dangerous, but finding mistakes and letting the world know is the ethical thing to do.

      The unethical ones in this situation are the companies who released their code without a security review. Those managers didn't give the programmers (or QA) extra time in the sprint to test for security bugs.

      --
      Irresponsible disclosure is responsible
    7. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, you use whatever information you have available to you and white hats are more likely to be *given* information as part of a legitimate sanctioned pentest.

      When an organisation is paying for someone's time, its pointless paying them to spend time finding out information you could just have given them. Insider threats can and do happen, information does become available, and by giving that information to your paid testers you make better use of the available resources.

      Information about your network or code should not result in it being compromised, and won't unless there are serious flaws lurking somewhere.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Bert64 · · Score: 0

      Capitalism is inherently unethical...
      Why would these companies perform a security review (which costs money and reduces profit) unless they are forced to?
      Clients don't demand it, laws don't mandate it, its just a cost with no benefit. It's much cheaper to threaten anyone who finds and exploits the holes, as the enforcement of those threats will be carried out by the police who aren't on your payrole.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    9. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anybody hacking without a mandate is either grey-hat (if they do inform the target and do not try to extort them) or outright black-hat.

      These are Indians. They're diaper hats.

    10. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, in theory. In practice you never have "everything" and often you are missing important things, like source-code. But a white-hat hacker may well do a black-box pen-test. (Not that these make much sense, but if the customer asks for it...)

      But note that "insider information" is not "insider information" anymore for the purpose of an authorized attack if given to the hacker voluntarily, because a hacker is always an "outsider", even if simulating being an insider.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Information about your network or code should not result in it being compromised, and won't unless there are serious flaws lurking somewhere.

      Indeed. In actual reality that unfortunately is often not true. Keeping information secret (besides crypto keys and similar things like passwords) should always only be regarded as an additional layer of security, but quite often it is all that keeps attackers out. For a while.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. "Ethical hacker" is a term with a defined meaning. It is not a "hacker" that simply behaves "ethical". A synonym for "ethical hacker" is "white hat hacker" and that does not involve hats of a white color either.

      That said, I do agree that "legal" and "ethical" are often only loosely connected and sometimes they are not connected at all. The latter does not even need a totalitarian state where the law is mostly or only a tool for oppression. People that mistake "legal" for "ethical" do not understand either concept.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Why would these companies perform a security review (which costs money and reduces profit) unless they are forced to?

      Long-term economic survival. The problem is mostly not that these companies are profit-oriented, the problem is the incredible short-term focus used so often today. And, of course, the problem is people (like the typical CEO) only looking out for their own economic well-being but have zero loyalty to the company they are supposed to be serving.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:That is not what "ethical hacker" means by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It's unethical to trade goods and services? What is ethical to you? Where you work for your lord and master (excuse me - well, meaning government servant) and the lords of the manner get to dole out what they think is good for you.

      Nah man. I'll keep my unethical capitalism.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  2. What's with the puff piece malvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Indians doing the white-hat hacking are not the ones working for the outsourcing companies. They are like the top 0.0001% of the Indians in the IT sector, the ones that have enough functioning brain-cells to use a toilet without standing on the seat and squatting.

    Outsourcing companies hire the cheapest, weakest, stupidest of them that are the only ones that will accept the meager/paltry salaries provided.
    That also explains why the ones they do hire don't give a fuck about who they're contracted with. When the shift is over, the shift is over, just hangup, logout, leave, who cares if the problem they were working on is fixed or not, or even if they've told anyone what the status is, or handed over steps taken to the next shift.

    1. Re:What's with the puff piece malvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've personally dealt with hundreds of them and found exactly 3 that were worth the effort to train.

      Flamebait? No, experience.

  3. eyes and teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its because Eyes and Teeth have no one else to hate on..
    give me now, give me more..
    Those whom seek to destroy the industry, destroy themselves for lack of anything else..

    1. Re:eyes and teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot believe there was a mention of EYES AND TEETH..

      Even Eyes and Teeth have to Eat away at other Eyes and Teeth..
      to perpetuate their own eyes and teeth..

  4. Matter of Money by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Even if bug bounties values sound impressive, if you start thinking about it as salary it often isn't worth it for developers in the west to work on. You can spend a lot of time to maybe find a vulnerability which has a variable pay-out depending on the severity and someone else might submit first leaving you with nothing. Sorry but no thanks.

    1. Re: Matter of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do they keep coming to western higher education?
      And my experience of Indian developers are that 75%+ suck at doing anything except churning out code without much thought and they will probably be replaced with source code generation in a couple of years, Then there is a group between the last group and about 95% that manages to put out decent code and last 5% are the skilled one that write good and original code.
      My biased opinion of "western" developers are that the first group is generally smaller and the middle group larger.

  5. per capita? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about providing some per capita persepective before we all bow down before the great Indian hacker intellect.

  6. Paid slashvertisement by Tata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The yearly "Indian workers are really good!" round of stories is in progress. Yahoo is taking big bucks from them, like they lap up any cash they can get, including serving up malware to Firefox paid for by Microsoft.

  7. India is all hat and no cattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. Re:"makes them uniquely gifted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Isn't this basically "writing a mini-van?" ( http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-11-13 )
    I mean, come on, they write the buggy code, so they know where the exploits
    are - seems like a win-win scenario that they've built for themselves. Kudos.

    CAP === 'queuing'

  9. For a country that doesn't teach or value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ethics, why is this a surprise? I understand that when you don't have enough food or clean water, that ethics take a back seat, but to my Indian friends that are all making well into six-figures, you'd think they would change.

    1. Re: For a country that doesn't teach or value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. So much this. We had an error in our payroll system that sometimes overpaid employees. We had nearly fifty Indians that were overpaid, but when I was I immediately notified HR. Not a one of the Indians did. They still won't talk to me since the problem was fixed.

    2. Re: For a country that doesn't teach or value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try getting anything done here in India without paying a bribe. When I lived in the US, I was shocked when I didn't have to pay anything extra to get a drivers license, register my car, get cable TV installed, etc..

  10. Contradictory news by manu0601 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is puzzling. One day we are told 95% of indian engineers cannot code, and the other day India has huge number of highly skilled hackers.

    1. Re:Contradictory news by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Those are two different skills, you know. Programmers construct software. Hackers look for ways to break software.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you don't know what hackers actually do.

    3. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Rarely is an engineer of any kind, "software engineer in the summary", talented in security. Engineers make things that work. That is their mindset (aside from combat engineers- they make things go boom). Security people know how to make things break in a way that is advantageous.

    4. Re:Contradictory news by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you don't know what hackers actually do.

      Yeah, that's because I'm a programmer, not a hacker.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:Contradictory news by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      India has a large population. 5% of a large number is still a large number.

      What's happening in India right now is what happens when you push everyone into IT or to be a programmer. (Just like the skilled trade shortage in the US is what happens when you push everyone to college for 'anything').

      For 90% of my tasks that my company wants to outsource to India I would rather just have a high school student with some Python classes. At least with the high school student I can occasionally look over their shoulder and direct them to how I want some of our classes to work. And they'd be even cheaper than an outsourced developer.

    6. Re:Contradictory news by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Five percent of a sufficiently large group can still be a huge number. As of 2012, the Indian IT sector was estimated to directly employ 2.8 million people and indirectly employ another 8.9 million, and the country itself to have a population of 1.264 _billion_ people with an unemployment rate of 5.20 percent. That's potentially a LOT of hackers looking for work...

    7. Re:Contradictory news by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      I know some bug bounty guys are making a good living off these programs. The majority however do not. Not everyone can spend days digging around hoping to get paid for something. It's unsurprising that a country with a much lower cost of living has a lot of guys willing to do this.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    8. Re: Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5% of Indian engineers is still a massive number. It is a country of 1.2 billion people.

    9. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are program 'testers" like the "structured walk through" and testing groups. Paying them is fine and they save companies hundreds of full time employees. So,they are self appointed "testers". With 1.25 billion people, it is not surprising to find a few hundred good programmers. In India bogus paper degree holders have ego,jealousy and the incompetent government officials, l look at them from their job security perspective rather than as contributors. An American Professor who does not get tenure becomes a hero in a foreign country. Take for example, Deming the Guru of Statistical Quality control 6 sigma is a hero in Japan and zero in the US. The same paradox is found every where.

    10. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rarely is an engineer of any kind, "software engineer in the summary", talented in security.

      In fact many of them are not even competent in security and that's a big reason why so much of our software is insecure. As the famous hacker Kevin Mitnick has observed on numerous occasions and in his writings, security does not come naturally to most people. It begins with a mindset that must be cultivated and proceeds with education to gain knowledge, awareness and skills. However, without the proper mindset it's difficult to build or maintain secure code and unfortunately, as you have pointed out, that mindset is still relatively uncommon among software engineers and especially among those that don't work in industries such as finance, health care and defense which demand security training as a matter of regulatory compliance.

    11. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is not contradictory. It is simple. 5% of Indian computer engineers most likely exceed 100% of American computer engineers any given year. India has a population 3 times the US population and disproportional number of students go into into software industry.

    12. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have read to articles by people who don't know basic math and try to make mathematical sense of that so you are bound to be confused.

      At over 1/6 of the worlds population India its not hard to get a numerically large group of something

    13. Re:Contradictory news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your country has a billion people, these statements are not contradictory.

    14. Re:Contradictory news by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That was just some racist clickbait designed to cash in on the current rage against Indian H1B workers and offshoring.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Contradictory news by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      This is puzzling. One day we are told 95% of indian engineers cannot code, and the other day India has huge number of highly skilled hackers.

      They are actually not highly skilled. They are slightly elevated from "script kiddies". It's just that the rest of us are too stupid to take security seriously. Who is more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    16. Re:Contradictory news by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      This may be true, but I find the "racist" adjective disturbing. It suggests it would be unethical to study workers performance by nation in a given field: is it racist to publish bad numbers?

    17. Re:Contradictory news by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm British and don't want to be lumped in with all the other British people. I want to be evaluated as an individual. The last thing I want is for an employer to say "British people are on the whole dumb, their universities are mostly crap, therefore I'm not going to consider any British people or at least subject them to much harsher testing first".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Contradictory news by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      I understand your concern, but if I push your logic, employers should not even look at diplomas, and have exams for applicants. Some companies do that.

  11. Who is fooling who, if 95% of Indian coders unfit? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I ask because just last month, Slashdot ran a story that 95% Engineers in India Unfit For Software Development Jobs...

    I am personally proud of India. Didn't they launch some rocket to Mars at a much lesser cost as compared to the US recently?

  12. Re:Who is fooling who, if 95% of Indian coders unf by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    Cost is a metric.

  13. "uniquely gifted" by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no unique gift to becoming a cracker (these aren't "hackers"). It is just a willingness to perpetuate destructive behavior. It is very easy to crack software and systems, I use to do it all the time. It is much harder to create.

    1. Re:"uniquely gifted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If creation is easier, why do security people get paid more?

      There is no unique gift to becoming a cracker (these aren't "hackers"). It is just a willingness to perpetuate destructive behavior.

      Ahh, 20 years out-of-touch with the industry and can't tell the difference between DoS and, well, everything else.

    2. Re:"uniquely gifted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If creation is easier, why do security people get paid more?

      Fear.

    3. Re:"uniquely gifted" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If creation is easier

      Erm. 110010001000 stated that it's "much harder to create."

      So your if clause returns false and we ignore the rest of your query.

    4. Re:"uniquely gifted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excessive pedantry and intentional ignorance towards the human condition is why people don't like you and your kids don't call or visit unless they want something.

  14. that is totally good by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    kudos to India's ethical hackers, and all ethical hackers around the world

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  15. That's why they are hackers by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

    If they were rewarded, they would end up with jobs. If they had jobs, they would not have enough time to do all of that hacking.

    Their are only two ways you get hackers of this high quality:

    1) They are not rewarded.
    2) Their motivations outweigh their greed. Talking about religious extremism quality motivation.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  16. Statistical fallacy by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is puzzling. One day we are told 95% of indian engineers cannot code, and the other day India has huge number of highly skilled hackers.

    There is a Supreme Court Case where the court said traffic stops must be dangerous because a large number of police officers are injured every year while performing traffic stops. But the logic is bad. Without knowing how many total traffic stops there are you cannot really look at the risk of performing one.

    Similarly, even if 95% of engineers cannot code, they can still have more good engineers if there are enough of them--or can have more decent engineers working on this particular set of problems.

    It's also worth pointing out that (1) there are a lot of great Indian engineers who are not in India, (2) the 95% number you are pointing to was done by a company with an incentive to skew it one way, and (3) the people finding the bugs may not be a great match for the ideal job candidate but still have basic hacking skills.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:Statistical fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics is often poorly understood!
      I think you'll find that the median income in China is far less than in New Zealand, but the total number of millionaires is greater in China!

  17. Re: Who is fooling who, if 95% of Indian coders un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but it ended up hitting a random hot dog stand in Alabama instead

  18. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised there was not a suggestion to allow these 'white hats' into the US on some temporary work visa

  19. Complete and Utter BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet more fake news. Basically, some douche bags are trying to smooth the way with more reasons to allow out-sourcing of American jobs. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and the rest of the tech industry are trying like crazy to lower the salaries of the technical community to increase profits and satisfy Wall Street. Expect to see a LOT more of this BS in the not-too-distant future.

  20. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    You're still talking criminal on a leash, no matter the brand of the perfume and the make-up you're adding.

    That is not what "hacking" once was about, to the point that adding "ethical" to it makes no sense at all. Even the hats mean that you (in)security types have hopelessly confuddled everyone including yourself, with the result that "hacker", "ethical" or otherwise, means exactly nothing these days. And it shows.

    S'kiddies, the lot of you.

    And yes, your stolen terminology, now entirely empty, is quite related to your collective complete and utter failure to secure anything these last few decades. Your are the Emperor's new clothiers, it's the only explanation that actually makes any sense. So don't go complaining these cheap imitations from India aren't the real thing. They're about as functional and effective as everyone else in the industry, complete with getting the important bits hopelessly wrong.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are just trying to make excuses. What they are doing here is a straight forward criminal act. They gained access to a system without authorisation. There are no shades of grey here. They are just criminals.

    2. Re:Oh please by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I do know the traditional meaning. But sticking to a traditional meaning that is not used anymore by almost everybody just makes you sound like a prick that claims to be superior for knowing the "true meaning". I prefer to be able to communicate, even if language is alive and words lose their former meaning and get different ones. These days I do not even wince when somebody says "cyber", even is that is a newer development on my side.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Oh please by gweihir · · Score: 2

      There are shades of grey here. A wish to protect your society when nobody else does is a valid concern. Sure, it is vigilantism, but besides regular law enforcement (which is conceptually unable to tolerate any competition), vigilantism is a "grey" thing to most people, not pure black or white as you suggest.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do you, but it doesn't make you part of the solution. It means you remain part of the problem, along with the rest of the s'kiddies. Because note well, it's not about what you conveniently dismiss as "the old meaning".

      It's about the word currently having no meaning, thus is a scareword that means whatever the speaker wants it to mean, but to the knowledgeable betrays the speaker's ignorance. And it brings overtones of trying to pull the wool over the eyes of his listeners. Which is clearly what's happening here. By the same token, you might think we're gullible, or you're that gullible yourself. Both on both counts is also quite the possibility.

      I for me think that "security by s'kiddie" doesn't work, never will work, and in fact over the last thirty or so year very clearly has not worked. No amount of begging for respect, stealing terms, adding hats of colour, or making claims of being "ETHICAL" has changed or even can change this one whit.

      So, you do you, but even your complaints about "true knowledge" show that you are still not part of the solution. This does not change regardless of how many other people do or not join in. Even were I the last person on earth (which despite your claims I clearly am not) who holds this viewpoint, I'd still not be wrong, and you'd still not be right.

    5. Re:Oh please by Megol · · Score: 1

      So what was hacking once about? Horse riding? No, of course not. Being a hack? Nah. Doing something clever? Perhaps. Doing a thing that is clever, never breaking laws, rules or entering a grey-zone while doing that thing? Have _never_ been. Ditto but not disturb, destroy or cause problems? Perhaps but even that is doubtful.

      Being a script-kiddie implies not needing to know how to do the work instead relying on pre-packaged tools (but even that can require skills) however someone that circumvent security in order to gain access to a system is very likely using a hack or more likely a chain of hacks - and they are hackers. You may claim they don't share the "hacker ethics" whatever those are. But then why is someone that breaks rules to gain access to a computer not following the ethics while someone breaking rules to gain access to a locked room does?

  21. shock horror by gravewax · · Score: 1

    amazing, companies don't thank criminals for criminal acts, will wonders never cease. FYI they are NOT ethical hackers when hacking a site without permission.

  22. Change begins at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While being an "ethical hacker" might sound glamourous to the untrained ear, the Indian people would do well to get their own house in order first. Priorities, you know.

    Here is a suggestion. Get off your little indo-android tablet and start cleaning up the street where you live. Get a pair of gloves, and a plastic garbage bag. Maybe a small garden spade for scooping. Open your front door, step outside, and start picking up the litter, garbage, human feces, and dead animals that make your Indian street so full of "character".

    What's that you say, not your job? not your caste? Well I've got news for you buster, it is your job. You approach the world, your job, and software the same way you approach the filth in your street. Why would I hire you to clean up my code when you are too shiftless and lazy to scoop up the mounds of human waste in front of your door and under your own feet?

    1. Re:Change begins at home by xvan · · Score: 1

      Just like anything else, because in the short term they're cheaper, and in the long term if your high risk strategy didn't pay out you had enough time to get another job before the shit hits the fan.

  23. Re:Who is fooling who, if 95% of Indian coders unf by MrLogic17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    >Didn't they launch some rocket to Mars at a much lesser cost as compared to the US recently?

    They just barely got a small, proof-of-concept probe - and at that, it never got the desired orbit.
    NASA, in around the same time frame, got a much larger, far far more complex research package in the proper orbit.
    Good on India for pulling it off, but they were doing something vastly different than NASA.

    TL;DR: apples & oranges

  24. That's great. You know who we reward at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ankit Fadia. Google the guy. Much like the Indian companies recognize only charlatans.

  25. AcheDin by nettechindia0 · · Score: 1

    And We still say it's AChe Din!!

  26. Finding bugs from substandard outsourced code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they simply finding bugs from substandard code done by the lowest cost (or best bribing) outsourcer? And do anti-virus companies also have relations with malware writers?

  27. Stupid, and potentially sensitive question: by Travelsonic · · Score: 2

    Stupid, potentially sensitive question: How many of the vulnerabilities, do you think (if it can be ascertained) came from companies who outsourced their work to India-based companies?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  28. I found #4! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    1. Get a job with an outsourcing firm

    2. Work on IT project for major international company

    3. Purposefully introduce bugs into the software

    4. Report (or have a friend report) said bugs

    5. Profit!

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re: I found #4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. They know all the stupid coding mistakes because, India! Hello?!

  29. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're probably the same people writing the dodgey code in the first place. Most of the IT outsourcers in India write crappy insecure code.

  30. Re: Who is fooling who, if 95% of Indian coders un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they launch a satellite which exploded as well!?