Slashdot Mirror


New Threat To Traditional Sports Leagues: Millennials Prefer Watching eSports (venturebeat.com)

Professional sports leagues "officially have a millennial problem," writes VentureBeat, citing some interesting findings from L.E.K. Consulting.
  • 40% of millennials prefer watching esports to traditional sports
  • 26% of millennial eSports enthusiasts reported a significant uptick in eSports viewing over the past year
  • 61% of esports followers said they spent less time watching TV over the past 12 months, and 45% said they had cut back on traditional sports viewing
  • Together millennials -- ages 17-34 -- and Generation Z peers -- age 16 and under -- comprise 45% of America's consumer base

"At a certain point, this comes down to a new form of media better serving an upcoming generation of consumers," concludes VentureBeat. "Esports leagues are all online. Most matches stream for free on sites like Twitch. They are available on the web or through smartphone apps. Competitive gaming is easily accessible, and it lives where Millennials are already spending their time."

Maybe that's why Major League Baseball's video streaming company recently paid $300 million for the right to stream League of Legends through 2023.


100 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. 45% of consumer base is misleading by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 2

    "Together millennials -- ages 17-34 -- and Generation Z peers -- age 16 and under -- comprise 45% of America's consumer base"

    Whats the entertainment spending power of that group as a percentage compared to others?

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    1. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends mostly on their parents' income and how much of it they let them squander.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your post is dumb. I am a millennial and can do without people like you. I deserve a participation trophy for showing up here and posting. That participation trophy should include mod points so I can censor your dumb post to -1 where it belongs.

    3. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

      I was going to post:

      "/golfclap

      well done"

      to applaud your on your witty post buy then I realized it could be seen as applauding you for the participation of posting and things go so meta so fast that I nearly had a seizure.

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    4. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by war4peace · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The 17-34 year old ones do have less spending power than older generations, BUT!
      This is where details come handy.
      You can't only look at spending power as a whole - you need to look at what their spending power goes to.

      Say a 40 year old has a discretionary amount of 1000 dollars a month, out of which most goes on booze, trips and porn magazines. They spend zero on eSports.
      At the same time, a 21-year old has 200 dollars a month available, out of which 100 goes to eSports and related activities (CS:GO skins and shit like that).

      From an eSports perspective, who is your target?

      I agree that "45% of America's consumer base" doesn't mean shit as a statistic, but break it down to specifics and the picture changes radically.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 3, Funny

      "porn magazines"

      Dude, You're showing your age. :)

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    6. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What will be their spending power in a few years? Professional sports are trying to maximize short term profits at the expense of future earnings.

      My wife are at the leading edge of the millenials and have lost nearly all interest in the sports we grew up watching and now that we have dispensable income we've found other things to spend it on. We grew up fans of certain teams because we watched them with parents and grandparents on free OTA TV.

      After we graduated we tried to keep up with our Alma maters and watch our professional teams but the sports industry decided to make that impossible to do. When we were younger we'd go to a bar and try and catch the game but as we aged that became less and less entertaining.

      I even tried to pirate streams for a while because the local team decided it didn't fill enough $$$$ seats so they wouldn't air it. Or because we were closer in nautical miles to another sports team AND it was an NFC vs AFC game that it could only be watched on ESPN4, UNLESS we had the Plaid Sports channel with the blackout exception package. After a while we just gave up and moved on.

      I'm watching our younger siblings and their peers do the same. Because they don't have money it's "Pay rent" or "Buy Big10/SEC Network to watch football games" and Rent wins. My school can't figure out why they can't fill seats and it's because 0-12 year olds aren't excited about a team they've never seen play because their parents never watched it while they were growing up. Going to a Big 10 rivalry game was usually a Birthday present for me and my peers, but we watched it on ABC or NBC every other week.

      And they can't claim that the technology or demand wasn't there. Mark Cuban started out with phone lines so IU alumni could listen to home Basketball games, that turned into broadcast.com which Yahoo bought out. Professional sports could have charged a simple nominal fee to listen to 'home' games since 2000 and they decided to double down on the Cable route.

    7. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a best possible moment to drop your tablet in the toilet?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Jetstream · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm thinking that would be during the flush process, after the recently added "contents" are gone, but the water hasn't started filling back up. So there's a chance you can just towel it off and it'll keep working for you. ;)

    9. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      In a range of ethnic styles. And then he'd complain about them being racist caricatures.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends mostly on their parents' income and how much of it they let them squander.

      Not entirely, though. Kids grow up, and they continue to game as adults, and will likely continue to watch some eSports. eSports also sell games in a serious way.

      It's also a business, and while you still have some fly-by-night operations and problems, it's definitely beginning to grow up. Professional players are beginning to realize they shouldn't just trust whatever deal they are offered will be fair, for example. At least some of them are.

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
    11. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I'm within the top 30% of income earners in my state, so probably more than most I imagine. I know plenty of people that are older than me and don't even have half of my income.

    12. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      We're in the end still talking about watching people play video games. Unless they are WAY more interesting than the average "Let's play" on YouTube, I fail to see the appeal.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      There's a best possible moment to drop your tablet in the toilet?

      Not sure about best, but there's no arguing that before using the toilet is likely preferable to after using it and pre-flush. The worst possible time however can be well well defined as after using the toilet, pre-flush, and post a spicy burrito.

    14. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      If you had an account you could get achievements. It was an old Slashdot April Fools joke, but they just left it on. I'm assuming it would work for new accounts as well.

    15. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the appeal as well. But, I think the people who watch e-sports today are the same type of people who would have watched physical sports in ages past. So the "watching other people play games" market isn't growing, it's just shifting to new games.

    16. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      More importantly, someone who is 35+ has his preferences set--if you don't have him, you can't get him. The 17-34 set is changeable--he may not have much to spend now, but catch him now, and he'll be yours when he does have money to spend. So they're the guys you want to spend effort getting.

    17. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Cool! Let's start compiling stats and comparing accounts, then every few months we could draft teams of posters and the highest modded...
      Oh... I'm so sorry....

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    18. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People watch baseball too. I have trouble thinking of a video game that's more boring to watch than baseball.

    19. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      We're in the end still talking about watching people play video games. Unless they are WAY more interesting than the average "Let's play" on YouTube, I fail to see the appeal.

      So? I fail to see the appeal of watching men chase a ball around a field and yet it's a big business.

      Do not under-estimate the draw of watching people play games. The only reason sport was previously so popular was due to lack of competition for youngsters attention. This is no longer the case - casual games are taking in the majority of the eyeballs of young people these days. So is the internet, online forums, social networking, etc.

      Sport matches now have to compete with facebook, words-with-friends, twitter, etc. for attention, and it seems like sport matches are losing this competition for eyeballs. eSports is just another eyeball grabber (a small one at that); the days of celebrity sports worship is drawing to an end due to all the competition, not because of eSports alone.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    20. Re: 45% of consumer base is misleading by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, how can you even load up a browser if you're that stupid? Woosh.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    21. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not to someone who doesn't care much about football, I guess.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In the NFL, at least my sadist streak of potentially getting to watch someone get hurt is tickled, but with esports... Sorry, but carpal tunnel isn't as interesting as watching a concussion happen.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by danomac · · Score: 1

      Dang, where's the turd emoji when you need it....

    24. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Well low tech technology certainly beats ...

      I see what you did there (and TMI).

    25. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by war4peace · · Score: 1

      That too.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    26. Re:45% of consumer base is misleading by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I would say that would be right after you finished a backup of all the data on it, and wanted a new phone anyway.

  2. Not stupid at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Esports doesn't:

    Require tax hikes to pay for bazillion dollar stadiums every decade lest the team pitch a fit and threaten to leave. Then, to add insult to injury, make you pay for parking, overcharge for shitty food and watered down beer, then make you pay through the nose for tickets. Good tickets are reserved for those with very deep pockets.

    Have competitors who make $20, $50, $100M dollar contracts. They throw a fucking ball for fucks sake.

    Require a subscription to E$PN or some giant Sports Package just to watch your team play.

    I don't really watch neither of them but if I had to make a choice, it wouldn't be traditional sports. Fuck those greedy bastages.

    1. Re:Not stupid at all by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      YET

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Not stupid at all by cashman73 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Millennials spend most of their income on paying back their student loans, so they don't have the extra cash for $200 tickets and up. And GenX is currently too busy paying for their kids, and can't afford to spend $200 per ticket for a family of four ($800 and up) on a single game. That leaves the Boomers in the stands, who have been robbing their kids for years to pay for everything. Maybe one day, these old farts will retire and give us their season tickets,. . .

    3. Re:Not stupid at all by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People feel like they are closer to esports, in the sense that they can pick up a controller and with some practice get good at the same games.

      In fact games like Street Fighter V have been designed so that combos are easy and even average players can compete against high ranking ones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Not stupid at all by chispito · · Score: 1

      You don't a fair number of basketball fans shoot hoops in the backyard, or baseball fans throw the ball around?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Not stupid at all by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Good tickets are reserved for those with very deep pockets

      Depends on how you define "good". Frankly if "good" means corporate box locked in a silent cabin eating a nice dinner I may as well stay at home. If "good means front row where I spend more time looking up at some screen because I can't see an overview of what is happening on the field, then likewise.

      Part of the joy of going to a sport is similar to standing in a moshpit of a band, where the premium tickets will give you a boring assigned seat somewhere. Good and expensive are not the same thing.

    6. Re:Not stupid at all by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      Reminded me somehow of the lyrics to NoFX - Dinosaurs must die...

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  3. Re:The real threat: politics by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure when you ask millennials you'll find that they don't give a shit about Trump. I'm fairly certain, the answer you get is that "I don't care whether he or that other guy won".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. e stands for exciting by mentil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would rather watch eSports than real sports. Hint: I have never watched eSports.
    In the time it takes to watch other people play one game of baseball, or even League of Legends, I could win a few games of Hearthstone. I'd rather win at something I can do myself, than watch other people win at a level I can't play at.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:e stands for exciting by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'd rather win at something I can do myself, than watch other people win at a level I can't play at.

      I think couch potatoes and people who can't stand passive entertainment are both missing out on something. Personally, playing a video game can be fun. Sitting down for two hours to watch a movie can also be fun. I'm not a huge my team vs your team fan but occasionally during world championships and the Olympics I'll see if "our" athletes win, it can be fun to cheer for somebody. And occasionally watching skilled people do impressive feats is fun, even when it's not a competition as such. But if that doesn't bring out the wow-factor in you, then whatever floats your boat bro. Just be careful that it doesn't turn into general narcissism, if it's not about me it's not important.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:e stands for exciting by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      My own personal reason for watching eSports is to improve my skill by watching them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. These numbers do not seem that dratatic. by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 2

    Assumption: Referenced on other sites, Mellennials make up 23.3% of the US populace. Claiming 45% including 16 and younger skews the rest of the "data"

    Claim: 40% of millennials prefer watching esports to traditional sports
    So 40% of 24.3% (so we're looking at 9.32%) prefer esports to sweaty sports.
    Isn't that terribly easy to skew? Survey question: "Do you prefer esports or real sports?". If I cannot say "Neither, you insensitive clod" then it skews quickly towards esports. If forced to choose with a BFG to my head, the one I can play in the background on my monitor and ignore while I do other things is the choice.

    Claim:26% of millennial eSports enthusiasts reported a significant uptick in eSports viewing over the past year
    So 26% of the "enthusiasts" saw an uptick. Umm, define enthusiasts. Even if the assumed full 9.32% that chose esports over sports, 26% of that is just 2.4%
    Come on, 2.4% of the populace started watching more esports and the rest seems like inflated presentation.

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    1. Re:These numbers do not seem that dratatic. by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      It makes you wonder who paid L.E.K. Consulting to do this study. I guess this is a case of "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." The assertion that professional sports "have a millennial problem" seemed suspicious to me. While it may be true that millennials view and attend less sporting events than previous generations, this study doesn't sound like it necessarily provides evidence of that. Furthermore, it fails to demonstrate that if in fact traditional sports are in some kind of decline, "e-sports" have anything to do with it.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  6. Tastes Change by radiotalent · · Score: 1

    This is a typical cycle. The old is disregarded by the new generation for the next big thing. Those on the bleeding edge can profit. But now in our corporate sponsored world, it is cheaper for the old vanguard to wait and just purchase the next big thing instead of trying to innovate. Of course, they wouldn't be buying it if they didn't think it was worth SIGNIFICANTLY more than they were paying (otherwise, how could they should 7% growth of income every year).

  7. Perhaps they find them more exciting by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apart from Ice Hockey, US mainstream sports are a snoozefest. With the ever decreasing attention span of young people is it little wonder that audiences are voting with their feet.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  8. Re: Figures... No wonder the emptier stadiums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fun fact: "soccer" came from the brits. It was the upper-class and correct term for the sport, with "football" being a term for other games. It was British class hatred of the upper class which drove the term "soccer" into disuse, not some American misunderstanding.

  9. Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tired of the general populace subsidizing sports channels.

    https://www.outkickthecoverage...

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    1. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is really the key. Revenue for sports is generated because it is one of the few things that generates viewers for broadcast and TV. Broadcast TV was killed with timeshifting, and the only thing that saved it was reality TV, which was cheap, contest TV like dance shows and the like which encouraged views not to time shift, and sports which are seldom time shifted.

      ESPN value to cable companies is that men will tend to buy a cable package that includes it, in the same that families will buy Disney and old people will buy Fox News. These channels attract a premium in the carriage fees because they will attract subscribers. But still, a majority of views do not watch these channels, so they mostly make their money, as the poster suggests, through a sociality system in which people who never use the system are forced to subsidize.

      In a free market al a cart world in which the consumer only paid the carriage fees for the elected channels Fox and ESPN could not survive. The fees would no longer be hidden from the consumer, so the free market would set much lower fees that would not support the cost structure. An article was posting a few day ago that claimed ESPN could have saved itself by embracing technology. That would have happened only if was able to monetize the technology to consumers. As it has no experience at this, I don't see who it could work.

      Disney likely provides enough value to families as free babysitting to survive.

      In any case, most sports are toast for the same reason. They depend on inflated broadcast deals that in turn are funded at least in part by carriage fees that are funded in a large part by people who never watch sports. These fees are becoming more scarce by cord cutters.

      Streaming deals are funded only by people who stream, i.e. a baseball fan who wants to steam has to pony up at least $100. This is only a month of cable, but it is not longer a hidden cost that might have been included in other bills, so baseball fans might be less likely to subscribe.

      So fans go to other less expensive options. Also, schools are not doing nearly as a good a job at indoctrinating students into believing expensive sports are a good use of their hard earned money. Frankly you can get an excellent soccer ticket at the same cost as a nosebleed baseball ticket, and univision is broadcast.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      So fans go to other less expensive options. Also, schools are not doing nearly as a good a job at indoctrinating students into believing expensive sports are a good use of their hard earned money.

      Schools in the deep South are still doing yeoman's work making sure good ol' boys like expensive traditional sports. The deep South is where they build multi-million dollar stadiums while the textbooks literally fall apart. It's happened more than once in recent years. My ex is from Texas and has three sons. All three of them joined the football team in high school. Even the pudgy one. Two of the three still watch football, and profess to enjoy it. The formerly pudgy one doesn't. It's high schools in Chicago (and elsewhere in Illinois) that have started school sanctioned League of Legends teams. Times they are a-changin', but if there's one thing they don't like in the deep South, it's change.

    3. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by tepples · · Score: 2

      i.e. a baseball fan who wants to steam has to pony up at least $100. This is only a month of cable

      A month? Try a year, if the local ISP offers Internet for $62 per month or a bundle of Internet and TV for $70 per month.

    4. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was in high school in the late eighties in California we would have rallies 4 or 5 times a year. What were the rallies about? why the sports teams of course. Everyone on a team was celebrated even if they were bench warmers. It made you want to join a team just for the popularity and status. At the end of the year there was an awards ceremony for scholarship but it was relatively low key in comparison. It gave the impression they were doing it as an obligation. It certainly didn't inspire you to want to study harder.

    5. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by mentil · · Score: 1

      Actually Disney Channel is in deep trouble. Seen a young child lately? Good luck prying them away from their tablet/parent's smartphone. Chances are it's cued up to Youtube watching a Let's Play or random children's program; maybe not a premium exclusive-to-Disney program, but chances are the child doesn't care. The Youtube Kids app has more than enough content, and is 'good enough' entertainment for many young children. If they don't want to watch a video, there are long tons of free games. The tablet is TV's worst nightmare when it comes to entertaining young children. Short attention span? New game/video! All the major wireless carriers now offer unlimited 480p Youtube on an unlimited plan, most now offer unlimited 720p, so you don't even have to worry about data caps. If the $50 tablet breaks, who cares? Buy a thicker case next time. Once children are raised on the idea of on-demand video, they won't put up with watching shows on a schedule.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    6. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by fermion · · Score: 1

      You know, I wonder why the got rid of club penguin. Spent a huge amount on monthly subscription, it must have been a cash cow.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Anything that kills ESPN is fine by me by PMuse · · Score: 1

      In any case, most sports are toast for the same reason. They depend on inflated broadcast deals that in turn are funded at least in part by carriage fees that are funded in a large part by people who never watch sports. These fees are becoming more scarce by cord cutters.

      Indeed. I haven't looked for any stats, but I'm gonna take a wild guess that the cord-cutters overlap pretty strongly with the eSports-watchers. Hmm. If the people exiting cableTV are the ones that watched less sports, then the remaining viewership of cable becomes more sports-ish. Which makes me wonder why I'm still hanging around in a wasteland of pro sports, reality shows, and . . .

      Actually, I'm not sure there is any third thing left on cable TV. It's long past time I, too, took ship at the Grey Havens.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  10. Re:This millennial doesn't. by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

    "The reason I and my friends watch sports is to see feats that we can't perform"

    You could sit on a bench for free and watch people go to work.

    (said entirely in jest, because it's too good a jab to pass up) :)

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
  11. Re:The real threat: politics by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    Target

    Target is a bit high end for the average Trump supporter.

  12. Re:Colour me shocked! by dejaniv · · Score: 1

    You mean to tell me the younger generations don't like watching 300 pound men dress in up bullet-proof equipment to be able to run into each head first @ high speeds!?!? Or that MMA stuff with people getting kicked in the head and knocked out?

    Baseball ("no contact" sport) is included. Apparently millennials don't like to watch classic sports on TV in general. I wonder if this is because they don't like physical activity in general or unlike previous generations they don't consider professional athletes their heroes.

    Also, is the trend same for new solo sports such as X-sports (mountain biking, snowtubing and similar)?

    Most millennials I know are very active but generally prefer solo "non-mainstream" activities (parasailing, board-sailing, mountain biking, rock climbing, hiking etc.). Even if you turn these into broadcasting events (streaming footage from camera attached to athlete's body) it still fits better less formal Internet streaming than TV format. I wonder if these would be as popular broadcasts as eSports.

  13. Not just ESPN: Overpaid Sportspeople by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    It should also reduce sportspeople's salaries to less unreasonable levels. There are a huge amount of savings which can be made there before it will affect anything.

    1. Re: Not just ESPN: Overpaid Sportspeople by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Why limit it to athletes?

      Those are the only ones likely to be affected by people watching eSports which is what we were talking about.

  14. Fuck ESPN by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    ESPN (and the US sport in general) is an exercise in determining how deeply they can screw their customers. They don't offer any real web streaming, they require expensive cable subscriptions, they have geographic restrictions and so on. And on top of that, all of the "traditional" US sports are BORING - matches might take many hours and are usually excruciatingly slow with all the timeouts and replacements.

    Is it such a wonder that people who are not slaves to American Hand Egg prefer something more alive and user-friendly?

    1. Re:Fuck ESPN by mentil · · Score: 1

      Baseball might be watchable if it were 5 innings and there were a 'shot clock' in which the pitcher must throw or else it's counted as a Ball. (American) Football timeouts should be 60 seconds unless there's a flag, and the clock shouldn't stop on out-of-bounds (which is flagrantly abused by everyone.) The glacial nature of these sports is exacerbated by the broadcasters wanting space for regular commercial breaks. The athletes actually have to wait to resume play until the broadcaster comes back from commercial break and they get the all-clear; this is a huge F-you to people at the stadium. This could be eliminated by limiting commercials to inbetween quarters. Of course, the longer people are stuck at the stadium, the more beer/food they buy, and the more they have to pay for parking.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  15. Re: What a load of BS by sexconker · · Score: 1

    WTF? I knew of one case of this personally, and I always thought it was just some isolated, crazed nutjob.

    He was homosexual, but at the time I didn't think that was part of it for him. I just thought he was fucking insane. But there are more of them out there? Licking public toilet seats?

  16. Karma's a b-word by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Oligopolies have been dicking consumers around for so long that they are jumping ship as soon as they find a raft.

  17. Answer: reduce the number of games by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

    The NBA, NHL, MLB etc. should adopt the NFL/UCL/EPL paradigm: less, but more meaningful, games. One or two games per week - but games that actually MATTER. Who's gonna watch 1 out of 82 (or whatever the number actually is these days) regular season games when that particular game might matter very little in the grand scheme of things? Once a playoff spot is assured, even the teams sit out their main stars...basically nothing matters until the playoffs.

    That's why I stopped watching the NBA and the NHL. I don't have time for that - watching or catching up on 4-5 games per week. So you snooze over the regular season...then you start ignoring the first round of the playoffs...then everything.

    Cap regular seasons off at 30 games. Make the playoffs best-of-three (except the finals, which can be best-of-five). Then it would be interesting, and followable for the casual fan.

  18. Re: Figures... No wonder the emptier stadiums. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Yup. Public school slang for Association Football.

    Another fun fact: In England a "public school" is in fact a top-end private school.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. I don't care to watch (e)Sports by ZeroSama · · Score: 1

    It's more fun to participate

    --
    I read /. for the comments...
  20. Re: Millennials are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AC posts should be automatically moderated at -1.

    Because it's always trolling? Or do you just like censorship?

    Silencing someone else's opinion just because you may dislike it, and don't want to tarnish your eyes reading it is not a valid reason. If you don't like it, don't read it. Also you could just set your user settings to block the AC account, and not block it for everyone.

    if you can't even bother creating a Slashdot account, you shouldn't be able to post at all.

    The purpose of creating an account, is because you have an interest in the community and want to be a part of it.

    The problem with requiring an account is that you shut out people who want to get to know the community before fully committing to it. For them, if they can't interact with the community, if they can't find their niche, then it's not worth getting involved with.

    You also wind up creating an ideology bubble that's rather hard to penetrate. As most people who would challenge the community's groupthink wouldn't want to do so on a regular enough basis to justify creating an account. (Never mind that even if they do, they will be the subject of constant ridicule by the community.) Most wouldn't even have the courage required to do so in this day and age. As such the community becomes intellectually isolated, and stagnates as a result. Anyone that goes against the groupthink becomes a "traitor" and is forced out with enough violations, by becoming the target of multiple flamewars for nothing more than speaking their mind.

    But then again, I suppose none of that means anything to you Mr. Registered User, considering you need to be protected from us ACs.

  21. I grew tired of it by sanf780 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I grew tired of pro sports. Where I live, football/soccer is the main sport being followed. And things are getting to very high level of ridicule. The players do not show any sportsmanship, faking injuries in order to get adventages. Players even insult each other and have no respect for the authority that is the referee team. Players play as a brute when they want to get a yellow card in order to miss a not so important match they would be playing next. Boring tactics on the field bored me, and TV broadcasters did not enlighten me at all. Actually, the commentators tend to give extremely annoying remarks without substance all the time.

    And everyone is a critic nowadays. You know you would never play as good as the ones you are watching, but oh dear me if the striker misses a penalty kick. There is almost no recognition of the good things the players do. I wonder if it is because they spend half of the time whining in order to get an unfair advantage. I am sure kids these days are learning from the pros. At least the kids do not learn from the fights their fathers contribute to while they play the junior league.

    I know these statements are not reason why I would watch eSports, but these ones are the reasons why I do not watch any sport on TV nowadays.

    1. Re:I grew tired of it by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I would prefer a "clean" audio stream that just has the stadium announcer and the sound of the crowd. Except with hockey, where the play is so fast that all they can do is say who has the puck.

      The inanity of sports-talkers is just mental masturbation for their own gratification at this point.

      Of course now we have DVRs, which make American football and baseball watchable in well under an hour.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  22. Re: Millennials are stupid by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    open discussion is important, but a -2 to shit-bin stuff into neverneverland would be possibly useful. make it so not-logged-in users can't even see them. would make the site a bit more presentable, and possibly attract better commentards to join the fray.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  23. Re: Millennials are stupid by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

    I say may as well experiment since the Slashdot groupthink / ideology as basically Naziism as this point.

  24. Re: Millennials are stupid by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    Believe me, I can way more than afford TV on my $80k/year income, I just think TV is crap. Essentially it comes down to this: 500 channels and nothing good is on, and you have to waste a third of your time watching commercials. Even when you can skip commercials with DVRs, it's just annoying. And besides that modern TV providers rarely support third party DVRs these days, and their in-house DVRs very often forbid skipping commercials.

    So fuck TV, it's just something old people do.

    BTW, I legally became an adult in the year 2000, so I'm a millennial. But I'm also 35, and TFA seems to say millennials have to be 17 to 34, which is odd because the definition of millennial is somebody who became an adult after the turn of the millennium, which I certainly did. Maybe I'm a borderline case, I'm not sure.

  25. I'm not complaining by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

    It will be pretty cool when they drop the prices and let me bring in food to fill some seats :-)

  26. No royalty payable to inventor of ball sport by tepples · · Score: 2

    Ball sports doesn't:

    Require permission from a game's inventor just to start your own league. Many publishers of proprietary video games used as esports assert their exclusive right to perform their games publicly, demanding either a royalty per match or even to shut down streams entirely. See "Why Nintendo can legally shut down any Smash Bros. tournament it wants" by Kyle Orland.

    I am aware that the MLB, NFL, and NBA leagues tightly control broadcasts of their matches. But they have no legal standing against broadcasts of matches of a different league playing the same sport, unlike publishers of proprietary video games. The closest thing in ball sports to the exclusive right of the publisher of a proprietary video game is probably Arena Football League's patent on the use of rebound nets in indoor gridiron football. But other indoor gridiron football leagues successfully designed around that patent, and patents expire much sooner than copyrights anyway.

    1. Re:No royalty payable to inventor of ball sport by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Even simpler: ball sports doesn't need a licence to play. Imagine a world where the football is a luxury good manufactured by a monopoly, and making your own ball is a crime. Contrast that with today's stars who started out in poverty, playing backyard games with makeshift equipment.

      Next time somebody compares e-sports to chess, remind them that chess is completely open-source.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:No royalty payable to inventor of ball sport by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      It's not like players go from playing in their backyard with makeshift equipment straight to the pros, though. At some point they'll need to have access to actual equipment and facilities, which can cost a good chunk of change. I wonder how much is spent on the average high school football or basketball player compared to how much a CS:GO or League of Legends player needs to spend.

      True, but everyone starts at the bottom, and it shouldn't cost much to at least try the very basics. I'm sure there are places to try out closed-source games for free, though.

      I also understand there are costs in any sport, but there are usually competing manufacturers to keep the prices somewhat sane.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  27. A basketball court is smaller by tepples · · Score: 1

    I sort of see your point for baseball.

    But what works for soccer and gridiron football might not work for basketball and ice hockey. A football pitch is much bigger than a basketball court or ice hockey rink. This means there are fewer seats per match to sell, which requires more matches per year for a given revenue level.

    1. Re:A basketball court is smaller by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      You're right, with 94% attendance in the NBA (as measured relative to capacity), there is little incentive to change. I doubt the figure is that high for the NHL though, on average. However, most of the money NBA teams make comes from TV rights and merchandising, not ticket sales. If there were, say 45 games per season instead of 82, each game would be worth more...also they could probably raise ticket prices and still keep the arenas packed.

      The only way things will change is if attendance and/or TV viewership starts to drop significantly. The latter will be more of a factor, if it happens, I think.

  28. Youtube is a part of it by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

    We're in the end still talking about watching people play video games. Unless they are WAY more interesting than the average "Let's play" on YouTube, I fail to see the appeal.

    Sure, but people enjoy different forms of entertainment, and enough people enjoy this that it is now a business model.

    And while it may be more interesting than the *average* let's play on youtube, a lot of it is a streaming sport. Having your own personal stream as well as contractually playing on the team stream for a certain time each day is normal.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
  29. Pickup basketball by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can't just show up at some sport field and say "hey can I play?" to whoever is there.

    Then what are the 10-foot-high hoop and backboard at the city park for if not pickup basketball? Or are you like Willie, finding that a match has almost always started without you?

    1. Re:Pickup basketball by tepples · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that streetball is as different from college or professional indoor basketball as hard court tennis is from, say, grass court tennis. But it's still a case of showing up in a public place and seeking players for a sport match.

  30. Let's look at it pessimistically by mewsenews · · Score: 2

    The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Millenials are being saddled with giant student debt loads at the same time they are being expected to pay forward to social assistance programs that are being utilized by boomers on their slow shuffle off the planet.

    The megacorps that own America can't have it both ways -- they can't pressure wages downward with the threat of outsourcing and then expect the oppressed people to cough up for expensive entertainment, whether it's movie tickets, sit down restaurants, or live sporting events. All those industries claim to be suffering but what did they expect? People, especially young people, are losing their ability to spend on trivialities.

  31. Just 3 little points. by Northdot · · Score: 2

    1) Lets stop calling games as "sports". This includes poker, chess, and anything involving computer button pressing. Not to denigrate such things, but they are competitive games, not sports.

    2) Live televised sports have become so "monetized" with commercials that many are virtually unwatchable. For a generation used to Netflix and adblocked Youtube, it's a non-starter. Have you tried to watch a football game in the past few years? There is a commercial almost every whistle. Constant bombardment.

    3) Most Millenials grew up playing video games, not playing a pickup game of baseball/football/tennis/whatever with their friends. So watching such sports lacks the vicarious thrill of people who did play them. Simply not as interesting to them on a primal level as older generations. Vice-versa with the eSports games.

  32. Re:Traditional sports are boring by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    At least with e-sports games(or any other game really), ANYONE can join a game if they want while watching the game play out at the same time and try to imitate whatever you see on video.

    Anyone can play, as long as they buy the license for the closed-source game software from the single manufacturer. Not exactly like learning football with some random spheroid.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  33. Wrong title by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Title say "Millennials Prefer Watching eSports", and summary says 40% of them prefer watching eSports. Since when 40% became a majority?

  34. Re: Millennials are stupid by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    The borderline is birth ca. 1980. My wife was born in 1977, her brother in 1981. Culturally, she is Gen X, he is Gen Y/millenial.

  35. As a gamer... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... I can't get into those esports. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  36. Of course real sports are opressive and ableist by bursch-X · · Score: 1

    What? Real sports? With all those fit athletes who promote unhealthy, unattainable body norms and their ableist propaganda? Millennials can't watch that. They'd rather be playing video games where a 300kg retarded, blue-haired Gorrila Mutant can still be a hero. Hooray for the liberation of the oppressed basement dwelling landwhales!

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  37. Millenials play different sports by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You should have seen the Alumni at my old University flip out when the new Director of Athletics cut funding for Football and Baseball and put the money into Ultimate and Soccer because that's what the kids were actually playing.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  38. Re:Colour me shocked! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    You mean to tell me the younger generations don't like watching 300 pound men dress in up bullet-proof equipment to be able to run into each head first @ high speeds!?!?

    Not a fan of football (either variety) so I'm not defending it in any way... but football seems to be doing better among young people than baseball or basketball. One exception is China, where for some weird reason everyone is going bonkers over NBA basketball.

    Or that MMA stuff with people getting kicked in the head and knocked out?

    This comment reveals your basement-dwelling, videogame-playing, hentai-fapping mindset. If you actually lived among other humans and interacted with them, you might get a better grasp of their behavior. A fight always draws a crowd. People are drawn to violence, it's a primal instinct. Pay attention and you might notice that every commercial motion picture ever made has copious amounts of violence. Well okay there are a few movies that don't have violence, but these don't make any money and young people certainly don't watch them. The top box office movies every year are comic book violence-fests (teenage boy magnets). Or sci-fi violence-fests (Avatar).

    As for MMA itself, I was under the impression that it was more popular among young people than traditional boxing. I can see the appeal as it offers a more variety of tactics and (usually) offers more action per minute, with less possibility of a snoozefest like Mayweather-Pacquiao.

  39. Re: Millennials are stupid by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    It doesn't cost anything to make another account...

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  40. Re: Millennials are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's an even more important reason to allow anonymous posting that's mentioned in the FAQ and I've personally utilized several times. Sometimes you have a very good contribution, that winds up highly scored, that for various reasons you just don't want linked to a username that itself or by its other posts can readily reveal your identity, and making a whole new account just for that one comment is just too burdensome to bother. Ultimately I agree with the policy that you just lose more than you gain, especially since any registered user can automatically put AC and -1 and their threshold higher if they aren't interested in it.

  41. Re: Millennials are stupid by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    The ones who have a gpg pubkey on Slashdot are less anonymous, especially if the pubkey has their real name associated with it.

  42. A sucker born every minute by PMuse · · Score: 1

    Let us not forget that the relatively young are much more easily sold to by marketers than those who have already chosen and settled into their rut. Even if the 35-60 crowd or the 61-80 crowd has more money, it is much harder to sway those people to shift their spending. Plus, sports has probably already captured as much of the 35-80 crowd as it can reasonably expect to get. This is not to say that the 17-34 crowd are dumber spenders than older folks, but rather that they remain undecided spenders. They are the better opportunity for marketers.

    "The force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded."

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  43. Re: Millennials are stupid by Maritz · · Score: 1

    So you admit to being a lazy deluded Millenia?

    And the point is.... you are entitled to it?

    ok.....I'm not disagreeing with you, but how is that different from the generalisations?

    Did you take reading comprehension? It just it looks like you didn't. Millenia? Are you just stupid, yeah?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  44. Re: Millennials are stupid by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    I remember, in the dim and distant years following my attaining majority, there was a song entitled "57 channels and nothing on".

    So, in 30 or so years (I honestly forget when that song came out), there has either been a 1000% improvement. Or 0% change. Or both.

    I've lost the comment from someone who was complaining about advertising time on the TV. That's been a [SHRUG] to me since I re-entered the TV market a little over a decade ago (after 1.8 decades out of it. There is advertising-fed TV available, if you care to watch it. I don't; I prefer to pay the £145/ year ($US 187.5/year) to legally watch some of the best programming in the world (even Americans admit to that), without adverts. And the Ad-funded TV is restricted to 4x2.5 minute slots/hour. Which I fast-forward, on those very rare occasions they produce something worth watching.

    Outside the motorbike racing, is there sport on TV? Why?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  45. I never watched sport in my life.. by idji · · Score: 1

    I am 50 and have never been interested in spectator sport - to me it is a pointless exercise. Why should I watch some team play another team? I care nothing for it.

    BUT I love e-SPORT. Watching Starcraft was great and then I switched to League of Legends. I still have zero interest in spectator sport.

  46. eSports? No such thing. by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    I think you're talking about games.

  47. Re:The real threat: politics by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    ... just like Target decided their stores were mostly for transsexuals.

    Hyperbole meter pegged.

  48. Re: Millennials are stupid by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    To me, sports jumped the shark about a decade ago.

    Anyways you can get ad free TV here, it's called Netflix, HBO Now, and bittorrent. And that TV is generally worth my time, but I don't consider it TV in the sense that I'm not watching linear broadcast content.

  49. Re: Millennials are stupid by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Anyways you can get ad free TV here, it's called Netflix, HBO Now, and bittorrent.

    What is their annual fee, compared to the Beeb? As I said, the Beeb costs GBP145/yr (USD ~187), while the lowest range of the commercial providers is about GBP 450/yr (USD, about 600).

    Really, it does surprise me the the Beeb hasn't made greater efforts to secure (and supply) people outside Britain and the external territories. I smell the smell of politicians being pressurised by for-profit media companies. Murdoch - I'm looking at YOU!

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  50. Re: Millennials are stupid by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    Netflix is about $120/year. HBO varies.

    I've watched BBC content before and I'm not really that into it, which I guess you can attribute to cultural differences. Meanwhile, domestic content here tends to be quite good. For example Game of Thrones, Lost, Married with Children, The Walking Dead, Black Sails, Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul, Battlestar Galactica, Stargate SG-1, Firefly, Star Trek: The Next Generation, and Silicon Valley, are all among my all-time favorites.

  51. Re: Millennials are stupid by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Different cultures indeed. From your list, I've only seen any episodes of ST:TNG and Firefly, and of those, I'd turn from a ST:TNG to a Firefly episode any day.

    Oh no - tell a lie, I've maybe seen one or two episodes of Battlestar Galactica. Some robot that goes "wibbly wibbly" and has a tambourine hanging on it's chest?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"