Slashdot Mirror
Astronomers Prove To Einstein That Stars Can Warp Light (theverge.com)
Astronomers have observed for the first time ever a distant star warp the light of another star, "making it seem as though the object changed its position in the sky," reports The Verge. The discovery is especially noteworthy as Albert Einstein didn't think such an observation would be possible. From the report: These events require stars that are very far apart to line up perfectly. That's why Einstein once wrote that "there is no hope of observing this phenomenon directly." Our telescope technology has become far more sophisticated than in Einstein's day -- which is what allowed us to observe something he thought we'd never see. In 2014, a group of astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope spotted a rare type of microlensing, when a dense white dwarf star passed in front of another star thousands of light-years away. The stars weren't exactly aligned, but they were close enough that the white dwarf made it seem like the background star performed a small loop in the sky. "It looks like the white dwarf pushed it out of the way," Terry Oswalt, an astronomer at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University who was not involved in this discovery but wrote a perspective piece in Science, tells The Verge. "That's not what happened, of course. It just looks like that." The astronomers also used the apparent movement of the background star to measure the mass of the passing white dwarf, a novel technique detailed in a paper published today in Science. And they say this isn't the last time they'll make measurements like this either. Now that they've figured out how to spot these kinds of lensing events, they're hoping to find even more with new ground- and space-based telescopes that are coming online soon.
... obviously.
The sun is a star, and the light-bending capacity of that thing has been demonstrated quite a while ago. Also, proving something to somebody dead is not possible. Are these headlines intentional bait for wisesh*ts?
So you prove something to a dead guy?
Let's see.
Einstein isn't going to get anything proven to him. He is dead.
However, he showed that this should be true, why would it need to be proven to him?
Let alone the fact that gravitational lensing, which uses this exact effect, is a common technique these days.
What is the point?
May 29 1919 is very, very old news.
Einstein said such thing (light warping) happens but there was no hope (no probability) to see that. And you know what? He was right, as far as his whole life. So, even dead, there's nothing to "prove" to him that he didn't prove already.
This case is the similar (but not the same) with Higgs' Bosom, Higgs tought he would be dead before proving the existence of his bosom. He was wrong.
1) The term "prove to" implies that Einstein believed that such lensing doesn't happen.
2) Einstein is dead, so no scientists are proving anything to him.
Oh man, that Einstein, what a dummy.
I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
That's because this dupe got time-warped by gravity time dilation.
(The distant star is massive, after all)
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
"his bosom" ... Buahahahahaha!
You'd think Higgs would get to prove the existence of lots of bosoms being a physics superstar and all... ;)
Nice try, but that is just what the Patriarchy and the Illumanati want everyone to believe.
No shit? This was proven like, a century ago. And astronomers have been using gravitational lensing as a kind of natural telescope for years now. Somehow a direct observation of star to star lensing hasn't been seen before, so uhhh, cool I guess. But this isn't a scientific discovery by any means.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtOpj-M-j-c
So you can't prove anything to him. You can prove he's wrong, but you can't prove it to HIM. He's dead.
And it may not be wrong. There WAS no hope to do it. Did you ask if anyone had hope we could? No? If nobody had hope we could see it directly (and it wasn't necessary to do so anyway), then he was right.
But you can't prove to him he's right either. Because he's dead.
Einstein developed the Theory of Relativity, calculated what would be observed. The apparent angular displacement due to such micro lensing turned out to be so small, he said, "such a small displacement is unlikely to be observed". He is right, even after this observation, no terrestrial telescope can hope to observe this. You need to get a telescope the size of a school bus into orbit, install a contact lens to that telescope in orbit, and point it at the right spot to see it.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Here lies the importance of Sahu et al.’s project. Their astrometric lensing mea surements show convincingly that Stein 2051 B is not an exotic “iron core” white dwarf but a rather typical one, with a carbon-oxygen core and a normal mass and radius, thus resolving the long-standing debate over its nature.
(sic) So, they didn't prove that gravitational lensing exists (duh), but rather it was used to explain some weird anomaly. Cool, but definitely not as headline grabby as "Scientists Prove Einstein Wrong".
Did they resurrect him just to rub his nose into it? And did they steal his lunch money afterwards? Amazing!
Did the dig that fucker up and rub it in his boney face?
How did anyone prove anything to Einstein in 2014?
Completely worthless editors. Never change Slashdot.
The headline is worse than that. It implies that Einstein didn't believe in the existence of the phenomenon in question...
Oh it's even worse because the reason Einstein (and everyone else) believed his theory of general relativity was correct was due to the Arthur Eddington's expedition to view the solar eclipse of 1919 where he observed that the sun bent the light of a distant star changing its apparent position!
What is even more insane is that both the articles linked in the summary start out mentioning this 1919 observation proving that the submitter either never read the articles he was submitting or did not understand what they were talking about. This article is clearly a contender for the most ignorant article on slashdot award.
I'm pretty sure this exact effect was measured and used to first confirm the theory of relativity in 1919.
The fact that they still use Einstein's name in clickbait headlines is tribute to his genius.
no, it's a tribute to how much Jews are like women... they can't stop talking about themselves.
Einstein thought it happened, just that finding a star combination was extremely unlikely. The telescopes available in his day would never find those 2 stars.
He came up with the idea of gravity warping light.
Take that, Einstein, you bastard! Finally, you get what you deserve!
what else where they yelling at him as the title suggests?
They are trying to tell us that Einstein is actually still alive!
...or it didn't happen.
I am interested on einstein as clickbait