Slashdot Mirror


EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped (bbc.com)

From now on, European Union holidaymakers should return home without that sense of high anxiety about their mobile phone bill: extra fees for using it abroad should have gone. From a report: The new rules mean that citizens travelling within the EU will be able to call, text and browse the internet on mobile devices at the same price they pay at home. The European Commission said the end of roaming charges was one of the greatest successes of the EU. But a UK consumer group warned phone users could face "unexpected charges." Until now roaming, or connection, charges have been added to the cost of calls, texts and internet browsing when consumers from one EU country travelled to another and connected to a mobile network there.

67 comments

  1. EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1
    G_N_A_A (G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which
    gathers G.A.Y N1GGERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being G.A.Y N1GGERS.

    Are you G.A.Y ?
    Are you a N1GGER ?
    Are you a G.A.Y N1GGER ?

    If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then G_N_A_A (G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
    Join G_N_A_A (G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time G_N_A_A member.
    G_N_A_A (G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing G.A.Y N1GGER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of G_N_A_A if you join today!

    Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

    First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

    You can watch G.A.Y N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

    Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

    Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
    Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

    If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
    If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

    If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

    This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

    G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
    N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
    A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
    A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
    G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
    N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
    A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
    A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
    G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
    N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
    A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
    A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
    G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
    N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
    A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
    A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
    *_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
    Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
    Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
    Copyright (c) 2003-2015 G.A.Y N1GGER Association of America

    Ich Bindawalross (London) - G_N_A_A (NYSE:

    1. Re:EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1
      This is so bad it makes me cry..... With tears of laughter.

      NOW FOR YODA GREASE!

      How to Shove a Yoda Doll up your ass! The 9 Step Greased Up Yoda Doll Shoving process. Go Linux! Tsarkon Reports

      9 steps to greasing your anus for Yoda Doll Insertion!
      v 4.98.0
      $YodaBSD: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/yodanotes/9stepprocess.sgml,v 4.98.0 2016/10/30 13:30:20 tsarkon Exp $

      1. Defecate. Preferably after eating senna, ex lax, prunes, cabbage, pickled eggs, and Vietnamese chili garlic sauce. To better enhance the pleasure of this whole process, defecation should be performed in the Return of the Jedi wastebasket for added pleasure.
      2. Wipe ass with witch hazel, which soothes horrific burns. (Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda certifies that his lips, raw like beaten flank steak from nearly continuous analingus with dogs, are greatly soothed by witch hazel which makes it perfect for the anus after diarrhea.)
      3. Prime anus with anal ease. (Now Cherry Flavored for those butthole lick-o-phillic amongst you - very popular with 99% of the Slashdotting public!)
      4. Slather richly a considerable amount of Vaseline and/or other anal lubricants into your rectum at least until the bend and also take your Yoda Doll , Yoda Shampoo bottle or Yoda soap-on-a-rope and liberally apply the lubricants to the Yoda Doll/Yoda Shampoo/Yoda Soap-on-a-rope. You may need your gay squire/lover to help with this since your fat corpulent ass cannot do a self-reach-around.
      5. Put a n1gger do-rag on Yoda's head so the ears don't stick out like daggers!
      6. Make sure to have a mechanism by which to fish Yoda out of your rectum, the soap on the rope is especially useful because the retrieval mechanism is built in.
      7. Pucker and relax your balloon knot. Doing Kegel exercises several times actuating the sphincter muscle and relaxing it will help prepare your ass for what is to come.
      8. Slowly rest yourself onto your Yoda figurine. Be careful, he's probably bigger than the dicks normally being rammed up your ass!
      9. Gyrate gleefully in your computer chair while your fat sexless geek nerd loser fat shit self enjoys the prostate massage you'll be getting. Think about snoodling with the Sarlaac pit. Read Slashdot. Masturbate to anime. Email one of the Slashdot editors hoping they will honor you with a reply. Join several more dating services - this time, you don't select the (desired - speaks English) and (desired - literate). You figure you might get a chance then. Order some fucking crap from Think Geek. Suck and gag on a Dr. Who sonic screwdriver like it was the Doctor's dick in your mouth. Get Linux to boot on a Black and Decker Toaster Oven. Wish you could afford a new computer. Argue that cheap-ass discount bin hardware works 'just as well' as the quality and premium hardware because you can't afford the real stuff. Make claims about how Linux rules. Compile a kernel on your 486SX. Claim to hate Windows but use it for World of Warcraft. Admire Ghyslain's courage in making that wonderful Star Wars movie. Officially convert to the Jedi religion. Talk about how cool Mega Tokyo is. Try and make sure you do your regular 50 story subm
    2. Re:EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Yoda Doll tu me aces center, Como estoy en fuego junto ati, Tu me captivas con tu grasa, Te quiro dar todo mi culo, Mi Muneca de Yoda, Si tu eres si tu eres, Your my Yoda Doll, You fit right in my sphincter, I'm so proud to have you in me, Your my, my Yoda Doll

      On a dark butt-soaked highway
      Jedi jizz in my hair
      Warm smell of anal grease
      Rising up through the air
      Up ahead in the distance
      I saw ass pummeling sight
      My head grew heavy, and my anus grew taught
      I had to stoop for the plight
      There he sat in my anus
      Smelled jedi ass juice smell
      And I was thinking to myself
      This could be Heaven or this could be Hell
      Up my ass went candle
      And he showed me the way
      There were voices coming out my ass
      I thought I heard them say

      Welcome to the Hotel Greased Up Yoda Doll
      Such a lovely place
      Such a lovely place (background)
      Such a lovely face
      Plenty of room in my anus at the Hotel Greased Up Yoda Doll
      Any time of year
      Any time of year (background)
      You can find him there
      You can find him there

      His mind is Tiffany twisted
      he's makes my intestines bends
      he's got a lot of pretty faggot boys
      That he calls friends
      How they twist in my anus
      Sweet glory hole
      Some grease their anus to remember
      Some grease their anus to forget
      So I called up the Captain
      Please bring me my lube
      He said
      We haven't had that spirit here since 1972
      And still those voices are calling far up my ass
      Wake you up in the middle of the night
      Hear that jedi say

      Welcome to the Hotel Greased Up Yoda Doll
      Such a lovely Place
      Such a lovely Place (background)
      Such a lovely face
      They're livin' it up at the Hotel Greased Up Yoda Doll
      What a nice surprise
      What a nice surprise (background)
      Bring your alibies
      Mirrors on the ceiling
      Pink intestines on ice
      And he said
      We are all just prisoners here
      Yodas stuffed up our ass
      And in the master's chambers
      They gathered for the feast
      Plunge it up there with their steely knives
      But they just can't kill the beast
      Last thing I remember
      I'm in ecstasy
      Greased up yoda doll shoved right up my ass
      Relax your anus said the nightman
      We are programmed for anal receive
      You can plunge that yoda doll up your anus
      But you can never leave

    3. Re:EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      So should I try and understand why Islam cuts off heads, when governments are majority Muslim the country is destroyed, low GDP, horrible treatment of women, summary death penalties for homosexuals, clitoris-removal on coming of age girls, rape, kidnapping, closet pederasty and takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna? Am I to try to understand the genesis of this violent satanic behavior? Or can we finally learn to identify and eliminate evil when we see it?

      Takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna. Taqiyya and Kitman - this is a typical ploy of manufactured outrage by Imams and Mus-slime leaders. Those people in the religion of 'peace' are not afraid of cyber-reprisals or people holding pens, vigils or critics in the media.

      You people had best get a set of balls and get ready to end the scourge. All the kafirs will be killed (Harbis are killed), burtally taxed (Dhimmis are taxed) or converted if you let this happen. Religion of 'peace"-ers will employ Taqiyya and Kitman and lie like rugs until you let down your guard, the gain critical mass and then POOF, too late.

      Taqiyya, Tawriya, Murana and Kitman - remember those words for they are in their belief a command by their so-called God to lie and commit subterfuge to fly the black flag of Islam over the world and rule it with a bloody sword.

      These animals wont eat pork because "its not clean" but spill rivers of blood? Warped.

      Using Taqiyya and Kitman on silly Dhimmi kafirs like you

      I hate to break to everyone, but those people in the religion of 'peace' are not afraid of cyber-reprisals or people holding pens. You people had bet a set of balls and get ready to end the scourge. All the kafirs will be killed (Harbis are killed), burtally taxed (Dhimmis are taxed) or converted if you let this happen. Religion of 'peace"-ers will employ Taqiyya and Kitman and lie like rugs until you let down your guard, the gain critical mass and then POOF, too late.

      using Taqiyya and Kitman on silly Dhimmi kafirs like you

    4. Re:EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You could try to determine why the New York Times are apologists and promoters of Female Genital Mutilation.

      I guess when democrats cannot convince a woman to voluntarily have a knife be put to work between her legs, they are just gonna force her down and do it anyway.

  2. "Greatest success"? by sjbe · · Score: -1, Troll

    The European Commission said the end of roaming charges was one of the greatest successes of the EU

    If that is one of their "greatest successes" then the EU is a good approximation of worthless. Sure roaming charges are an issue but are a very minor problem in the grand scheme of things.

    1. Re:"Greatest success"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the worth of the EU, just a headline to catch attention. Besides this is not a small change - 10 years ago using a cellphone from Spain was 2 GBP per minute for calls in the UK. In USD that means at the time $4/minute.

    2. Re:"Greatest success"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The European Commission said the end of roaming charges was one of the greatest successes of the EU

      If that is one of their "greatest successes" then the EU is a good approximation of worthless. Sure roaming charges are an issue but are a very minor problem in the grand scheme of things.

      Pretty much like your opinion - very minor in the grand scheme of things. But since you've taken the time to help others understand that you're bored or incapable of posting something worth reading, why can't you talk about the good from this article where imaginary borders between 28 countries have just been dropped in a way that helps unite the people of Europe and reduce the overall individual's stress levels when dealing with technology and traveling? If anything, the rest of the world can follow suit and make this place more progressive with regards to technology...

    3. Re:"Greatest success"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the worth of the EU, just a headline to catch attention. Besides this is not a small change - 10 years ago using a cellphone from Spain was 2 GBP per minute for calls in the UK. In USD that means at the time $4/minute.

      Good news! Today that would only be USD$2.50/minute (ain't progress wonderful ;^b)

    4. Re:"Greatest success"? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure roaming charges are an issue but are a very minor problem in the grand scheme of things.

      You say that in the comfort of not knowing what it's like being able to walk across the border for lunch, or live in a house where depending on which direction the wind blows you get a message saying welcome to the Netherlands or welcome to Germany, or working in a different country from where you live, or those friends around the corner from you living in a different country.

      Roaming charges in a place where countries are so densely packed that you can walk from one side to the other without any great effort are a huge frigging problem.

      One thing that is very minor is your understanding of the rest of the world.

    5. Re:"Greatest success"? by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually that is a great success. It means the government only interferes with business when business is hurting consumers.

      Unlike say pai who is actively trying to turn internet in the USA into cable interactive television.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:"Greatest success"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, some time ago they were celebrating some occasion and they made a video with the "achievements" of EU, scrapping roaming fees was rather central because of the lack of content.

    7. Re:"Greatest success"? by sabri · · Score: 0

      Roaming charges in a place where countries are so densely packed that you can walk from one side to the other without any great effort are a huge frigging problem.

      They are. But so is government interference in a free market.

      The government (in this case, the EU) has no business dictating what pricing should be for a particular service, unless there are special circumstances like monopolies. It is very hard to argue that there is a monopoly or duopoly in most EU member States' cellphone market.

      As a consumer, you have the choice to either accept whatever rate is being set, or to just go and get a local sim card in whatever country you are. Or, to choose a carrier who eliminates roaming charges without being forced by the government to do so.

      For example, after living 35 years in the EU I moved to the US. Initially I chose AT&T as my cellphone service provider, but I switched to T-Mobile because T-Mo offers free international data roaming and text, and low rates for voice calls. I used to travel a lot, so that was important to me.

      With the EU basically interfering with a privately owned company's business model, T-Mo's competitive advantage would be lost if this were to be interested in my current jurisdiction.

      That's bad, and the EU needs to make a choice: either they keep their dirty politician fingers out of the market place, or they continue on the path towards the EUSSR.

      And yes, I know this is an unpopular opinion which is likely to be downmodded, but I don't give a rat's ass about that.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    8. Re:"Greatest success"? by jaa101 · · Score: 2

      The government (in this case, the EU) has no business dictating what pricing should be for a particular service

      Just like the US government has no business regulating interstate commerce.

      Seriously though, the EU is not dictating what the pricing should be, they're only banning the use of a customers location within the EU from being a part of the pricing model. I'm pretty sure service providers can still charge based on call distance if they choose to, they just can't tack on a fee for calls being cross-border. It's a legitimate step to take in bringing Europe closer together.

    9. Re: "Greatest success"? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Limited liability companies - all telco companies are that - exist only because the government allows them to. Free market fundamentalists like you often forget that. Don't want the government to meddle - accept unlimited personal liability.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:"Greatest success"? by sabri · · Score: 0

      they're only banning the use of a customers location within the EU from being a part of the pricing model.

      I don't think you understand what they are doing here. They are banning the charging of using a network that is not included in your service. They are banning the charging of using your service on a network that is not paid for by your subscription fees.

      On top of that, many EU phone companies have already slashed their fees, in order to gain a competitive advantage. The EUSSR is now taking that away.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    11. Re: "Greatest success"? by sabri · · Score: 1

      all telco companies are that - exist only because the government allows them to. Free market fundamentalists like you often forget that

      This law would apply to any network, including a mom&pop shop (if that would exist). So your argument is moot.

      In a free market, the government steps in only when needed. And right now it's not needed because no single party has the power to abuse consumers.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    12. Re:"Greatest success"? by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      They are banning the charging of using a network that is not included in your service. They are banning the charging of using your service on a network that is not paid for by your subscription fees.

      Yes, because the network boundaries very often correspond with national boundaries which it's the EU's role to break down. My bytes travel just fine all over the internet without me having to pay all the network providers involved and without me having to pay any special fees either. Peering arrangements are a thing. Why should mobile networks be any different. Next you'll be telling us you're against net neutrality.

    13. Re:"Greatest success"? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The government (in this case, the EU) has no business dictating what pricing should be for a particular service

      And the government is not. What it is is preventing arbitrary charges that cell carriers tack on for no reason based exclusively on which tower my phone happens to be connected to at a given time. The carriers still have the right to set whatever price they want, they just need to not arbitrarily screw a portion of the people.

      As a consumer, you have the choice to either accept whatever rate is being set, or to just go and get a local sim card in whatever country you are.

      Yes I have that right. The problem is the inefficiencies that causes. If each local SIM is tied to the same phone number then that's great. Unfortunately due to circumstances that I'll explain in a second no carrier here will currently offer dual-SIM or triple-SIM model phones in the EU. My neighbour just got a brand new dual-SIM Galaxy S7 from India.

      That's bad, and the EU needs to make a choice: either they keep their dirty politician fingers out of the market place, or they continue on the path towards the EUSSR.

      And now to the crux of it. You're against government intervention in a free market but ignore the way the market was setup in the first place. The entire telecoms industry was built on the back of government funds, in many cases by the government itself using government controlled resources (spectrum) and funded entirely by people. When you build something like this an privatise it (thanks to so many of you "anti-government" people) you end up with large government granted monopolies.

      Government intervention in this case simply creates a resemblance of what the free market could have done if it weren't for the government messing the entire industry up in the first place.

      Living in the EUSSR is great. We have healthcare, lots of holidays, cheap internet oh and now cheap phones now thanks to the government.

    14. Re:"Greatest success"? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They are banning the charging of using your service on a network that is not paid for by your subscription fees.

      Except that is an artificial delineation. Tell me what when two mobile phone towers are connected by a common fibre backbone by a common provider built by a common country, why should people be charged an exorbitant fee for one vs the other? Or why should a government granted monopoly reserve the right to charge a person several hundred times higher fee than the wholesale access price to a partner provider?

    15. Re:"Greatest success"? by sabri · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the network boundaries very often correspond with national boundaries which it's the EU's role to break down.

      Why would that be the EU's role? Again, network boundaries are a business decision, not a political decision. The EU should keep it's nose out of private businesses.

      Peering arrangements are a thing. Why should mobile networks be any different.

      Mobile networks are not any different and peering arrangements are a thing. What you are paying for with roaming fees is the privilege to access the network of a third party as if you were a subscriber there.

      Let me give you an extreme and fictional example. We have LuxemCell and Deutsche Telekom. LuxemCell only provides services in Luxembourg, which is a tiny country. This means that LuxemCell does not need a lot of infrastructure and can charge a very low price for its services. DT on the other hand needs to maintain a large network in Germany, which has way higher costs. Why would DT be compelled to provide services to LuxemCell's customers without being able to charge for it? Because that's exactly what's happening here.

      Next you'll be telling us you're against net neutrality.

      I am indeed against the current implementation of "net neutrality", for exactly the same reason. No government should interfere with the configuration of a private network. If a government wants to dictate how I should transmit data frames on a network, they should build their own network. Stay off my lawn and off my network.

      The whole term "net neutrality" is stupid and does not cover any of the technical aspects. Any network that needs "net neutrality" interference is an extremely poorly designed network in the first place. Reason for this is that in the simplest terms, "net neutrality" bans the prioritization of certain traffic over the other. That prioritization, called Quality of Service in networking terms, only comes into play when a particular link is 100% utilized. Any network which allows a subscriber traffic carrying link to be 100% utilized is poorly designed.

      What "net neutrality" advocates should be fighting for is regulation that bans intentional interference with subscriber traffic. But that's something that, strictly speaking, should be a part of contract law. Reason for this is that I have a contractual relationship with my ISP, and I'm paying to have Netflix traffic delivered to my cable modem. I can reasonably expect my ISP to deliver those frames without intentional interference, or they would be in breach of contract. I should be able to sue for damages, not Netflix, or some stupid ass government agency.

      Remember, you're asking for protection from the same government, that in other threads you'll blast for invasion of privacy when your ISP is compelled to hand over your browsing data.

      Take a step back, look at it from 10,000ft (or 3km, in non-retard units) and think about it.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    16. Re: "Greatest success"? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Yes and if my aunt had a pair, she would be my uncle.
      Like I said, limited liability, no personal responsibility, hence the government has to rein in this kind of companies. Mom and pop shops are not the reason any regulations are created because if they misbehave the owners will have to stand for it anyway. More importantly, they don't grow large enough to actually make a lot of damage.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  3. Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by speedlaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We had an EU friendly phone plan. We drove to Andorra...great skiing, good food, nice hospitality. There was a thief in the Mountains, who waylaid our travelers....Andorra Telecom. They sent a message saying that we'd used 50 euro in data (for some google maps...an hour's drive maybe). We turned off data. Then, they shut off our phone for a 250 euro data charge, which had magically run up in that 45 minutes before the 50 euro shutoff message. Andorra Telecom put a black eye on an otherwise interesting place-they are a robber in the hills...so . F@!K Andorra Telecom.

    1. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well. Androrra is not part of European Union. So *shrug*

    2. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andorra is in Europa, but not in European Union.
      same for Switzerland.

      these roaming agreements are not applicable.

    3. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1, Informative

      Andorra is in Europa, but not in European Union.
      same for Switzerland.

      these roaming agreements are not applicable.

      The continent is Europe, while Europa is a moon of Jupiter, though you are right when you say Andorra is not part of the EU.

      There is an article 'The Independent' indicates, though the article describes some more of the 'gotchas':

      The three non-EU countries in the European Economic Area — Iceland, Norway and plucky Liechtenstein — will introduce Roam Like at Home “shortly after 15 June”, according to Brussels.

      Other key exclusions include Switzerland, Andorra, Serbia and Albania, as well as the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. Some operators are applying the same basic European rules to those destinations, others are not; when travelling anywhere outside the EEA, you should check exactly what your operator plans to charge you.

      The best solution is really to check with your operator and get things in writing.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    4. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Europe is actually called Europa in several languages. It does not make understanding any easier.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no. Europe is called Europa in Europe.

    6. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by mjwx · · Score: 2

      We had an EU friendly phone plan. We drove to Andorra...great skiing, good food, nice hospitality. There was a thief in the Mountains, who waylaid our travelers....Andorra Telecom. They sent a message saying that we'd used 50 euro in data (for some google maps...an hour's drive maybe). We turned off data. Then, they shut off our phone for a 250 euro data charge, which had magically run up in that 45 minutes before the 50 euro shutoff message. Andorra Telecom put a black eye on an otherwise interesting place-they are a robber in the hills...so . F@!K Andorra Telecom.

      Well... Andora isn't in the EU, same as Switzerland but unlike Switzerland, they use the Euro because they've never had their own currency (prior to the Euro they used French and Spanish money). You should have checked that out before leaving.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Watch out for Andorra-not an EU nation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no. Europe is called Europa in Europe.

      Not in English.

  4. User will still pay for roaming by acoustix · · Score: -1

    It's not possible to legislate a cost into oblivion. Roaming costs will get moved into a different user fee. Stupid people will think that their government just "solved an issue". Smart people understand what's really going on.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can always tell who is the American idiot kid posting; above is a perfect example. This is about the single market, which expands to the internet as well. There is no added cost for service as the legal regulations are exactly the same already. This simply ends the divisive practice of charging for cross-border usage in an otherwise economically unified territory. It cuts profits, and companies can't increase prices in competition without losing revenue.

    2. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You can always tell who failed economics. There is no free lunch.

      There are costs to - some person or some company or some government - when a single roaming device crosses different carriers' mobile infrastructure.

      https://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Mobile-Infrastructure-sharing.pdf

    3. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not possible to legislate a cost into oblivion. Roaming costs will get moved into a different user fee.

      Yes, there is a cost to roaming, and the cost will now be blended into the base fee instead of a separate cost.

      BUT, roaming fees are an overpriced cash cow - the cost to provide the service is far, far less than the amount charged.

      Your choices are pay the ludicrous roaming fee or be without your phone (or buy a temporary prepaid SIM in the new country).

      So overall, most people will be better off with this new rule.

    4. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      retard

    5. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's not all wrong. At least in Norway, all the plans that didn't already have roaming included have had their prices increased or the data allowance reduced.

    6. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway isn't in the EU. Try again.

    7. Re:User will still pay for roaming by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      It is not free, but becaus it is now included in the regular cost, competition will mean it will overall be cheaper. Where I live, the cost of the cheapest usable subscription (1 GB data, phone and text included) went up by approx $4. For those who do not want a price increase, it is also possible to get a subscription without roaming at the old fixed cost, but then you cannot use the subscription at all abroad.

    8. Re:User will still pay for roaming by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Norway is following the EU regulations on this (as on a lot other stuff).

    9. Re:User will still pay for roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway also happens to be a signatory to EFTA and the Schengen agreement.

  5. my butt smells like farts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Panties Stink!
    They really, really stink!
    Sometimes they're red, sometimes they're green,
    Sometimes they're white or black or pink
    Sometimes they're satin, sometimes they're lace
    Sometimes they're cotton and soak up stains
    But at the end of the day, it really makes you think
    Wooooooo-wheeeee! Panties stink!

    Sometimes they're on the bathroom floor
    Your girlfriend- what a whore!
    Sometimes they're warm and wet and raw
    From beneath the skirt of your mother-in-law
    Brownish stains from daily wear
    A gusset full of pubic hair
    Just make sure your nose is ready
    For the tang of a sweat-soaked wedgie
    In your hand a pair of drawers
    With a funky feminine discharge
    Give your nose a rest, fix yourself a drink
    cause wooooooo-wheeeeeee! panties stink!

  6. Only if you have good covfefe... by Eric.pl · · Score: 0

    .. and don't brexit, frexit, itexit, portexit etc.

  7. Europe Must Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    I can travel across a whole continent with my phone and not face roaming charges. You guys act so superior, but you suck.

  8. "EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped " by NettiWelho · · Score: 0

    "EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped" Sorry but the title is a filthy lie. EU included possibility for operators to be excluded from dropping prices so they're all going for it. Finlands been in the EU since 1995 and our customs agency are just now in 2017 starting to realize they've been illegally destroying millions worth of alcohol and charging tens of millions illegal extra taxes on import cars over decades. EU has no spine, muscles, teet or brain. They should be doing something about the tens of millions of unemployed european youth instead of making laws which won't take effect for decades.

    1. Re:"EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped " by Megol · · Score: 2

      You are wrong. Roaming charges are dropped already, it doesn't take decades. I don't see why extra taxes or destruction of alcohol would be illegal, being an EU member doesn't mean one can't have stronger laws in some areas. E.g. the VAT is IIRC regulated to be at least 15% but most countries have a tax of 19-25% (often depending on the type of goods - which is also according to local laws).
      Sweden have a state monopoly on alcohol and personal import of alcohol is limited to avoid people importing and selling alcohol - and this is legal according to EU rules. Finland _also_ have a state monopoly on alcohol and ... Well, re-read the previous sentence.

    2. Re:"EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped " by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Roaming charges are dropped already,.

      This is false. All big 3 finnish operators have been exempted. Roaming charges will continue to be charged as usual, for atleast next 2 years.

      I don't see why extra taxes or destruction of alcohol would be illegal, being an EU member doesn't mean one can't have stronger laws in some areas.

      Because that was against the law and practiced policy was changed this year without changing the law after they realized they've been running foul of the actual law for decades now.

    3. Re:"EU Mobile Roaming Charges Scrapped " by Megol · · Score: 1

      You may be surprised to learn that the EU doesn't consist of only Finland and for most people charges are already dropped. The exemption in Finland depends on usage patterns and subscription prices being different than in other parts of the EU and the exemption is currently 1 year. However the maximum cost for consumers are what the Finnish operators pay the foreign operators - I'll let you do the arithmetic how that changes roaming charges in Finland.

  9. T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the water by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    Both T-mobile and Google Fi offer worldwide free roaming, the EU is years behind

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  10. Re:T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by that same token, so would skype or vonage.. since they also use the fucking internet via wifi to "roam".

  11. Re:T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the wat by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Both T-mobile and Google Fi offer worldwide free roaming, the EU is years behind

    The EU is pushing this through regulation, because the companies weren't willing to do this themselves. T-Mobile and Google Fi aren't European based operators, as far as I am aware? In France there is one operator who offers a great plan, one that being resident in Canada seems excellent, if I only make outgoing calls: http://mobile.free.fr/ Ignoring the features for people using the phone in France, here are the out of country features (translated), all for 19€/month:

    • Unlimited calls, SMS, MMS
      • From Europe and DOM (to fixed and mobile Europe, DOM and metropolitan France)
      • From the United States, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Israel and New Zealand (to the fixed and mobile countries of the same country and metropolitan France)
    • Internet 25 GB / month from Europe, DOM, USA, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Israel and New Zealand (in 3G) (beyond: 0.009 € / Mo from Europe, For other countries)

    I have to pay my ISP $57/month in Canada, and I don't get any of those international features. Heck when I do travel it is $10/day for 100MB of data, which work out to be around $300/month for 3GB of data!? It is cheaper for me to get a SIM card when I go to a new country, even if it is just for a week. T-Mobile is great in the USA for the pay-as-you-go plans.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  12. Re:T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the wat by darkain · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile has Deutsche Telekom as a majority owner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  13. be careful on the ferry though by fyonn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My UK Vodafone contract already had EU roaming included in it when I went to Germany recently, so I knew that I could keep roaming turned on as I intended to use google maps and the like while I was away. However to get to Europe we took the ferry from Harwich to the Hook of Holland. on that ferry trip, my phone picked up the Telenor maritime cell signal from the ferry, which counts as "rest of world" at £6 per meg! I wasn't even using the phone. it had just been checking email etc while I was asleep. Woke to an £18 extra bill for that...

    so be careful on the seas people...

    1. Re:be careful on the ferry though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      im happy to finally know the truth about my husband infidelities all these yearsand promised Mich to share his contact to anyone in need of same help after getting all the evidence and proofs on my husband’s phone.contact michackersolution@ gmailcom for any real Hacking job has my experience online with hackers have really been frustrating until i met Mich..within some few hours he was able to reveal all the real truth of his infidelities and lies on fb,whatsap, emails and instagr without touching the phone you can call, text or whatsap him on his contact +16282043675
      tell him Lille referred you hh

    2. Re:be careful on the ferry though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should be carefull in ALL coastal areas, everywhere in the world. You phone will usually connect to the strongest source, no matter what country that source belong to. Plenty of big ships have a small "celltower" on them with a satellite uplink connecting to the rest of the world. Its for the crew, but most phones can connect to them automatically, and you get great coverage over a sea from the coast, perticulary if youre in rocky coastal terrain in a radio shadow towards land like on many beaches.... and then youre phone use whatever plan and cost the ship uses.

      Plenty of people think its "fun" when the phone shows them in a country on the other side of the world. Its after they get the cost.

      Learn to limit data, and be carefull where you are. Personally I wont use streaming music and such when I can have it as MP3 files.

  14. Re:T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that at least for fi, it isn't reliant on the internet to roam. When I was down in Mexico I wasn't on wifi most of the time, yet I was still roaming for free.

  15. Re:T-mobile and Google Fi blow this out of the wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-Mobile is in the EU.

  16. Bad regulation. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    This regulation is bad for many customers. One has to understand that companies do not like to be cheated out of profits, so if you regulate a profit generating feature away, the money will be found elsewhere. Also, you have to understand that the telco companies still have their costs when you roam. It's a bad deal for them.

    So, what did happen? This regulation has been in the works for ages. Companies knew it was coming and could prepare. Where I am, the average subscription cost (including cellphone) has raised with 22% in the last four years, in a period with ~0% inflation. I gave up on that, and went a SIM-only subscription for 15€/month. For that I got 6000 units (SMS/call) nationally, and 5GB data nationally. For roaming I paid on usage. If you don't roam often: You just make sure you don't exaggerate and use Wifi when possible. My last vacation, I had a full blown 4€ roaming bill, for one week of Portugal for two lines (my wifes line and mine). That's cheap.

    Now, with the regulation, my cellphone provider gave me the following options:

    1. Keep the 15€/month plan, but you will be blocked from roaming.
    2. Get the 17€/month plan, but only get 2000 units (still plenty) and 2GB data (unacceptably low)
    3. Get the 27€/month plan, to keep what I had (6000 units, 5GB data) but be able to use it in the EU

    In summary: Option 1. gives me less for the same money. I don't know how you feel about it, but being able to call or get called when you are abroad is an essential feature of having a cellphone. I could see this plan be useful for kids and teenagers, but not for normal mobile adults. Even adults like me who do a few vacations a year and perhaps a business trip or two.
    Option 2, is basically: pay more, for getting less. Sure, you might argue that I get "more" in the sense I can call EU wide, but in the day to day case, I simply pay more.
    Option 3 is really just pay much much more to get exactly what I had. I mean, that's 144€ per line, per year more, simply to keep the ability to roam and have "decent" amount of data.

    Now, granted, if you are the cosmopolite Eurotrotter you will be better off. Keep in mind that those people are already people who earn a better living. So, basically, this really is the "poorer" (or more frugal) people subsidizing the richer people. Incidentally, the EU Commissioners are notorious Eurotrotters. For them this is awesome. For normal people much less. I do suspect a lot of self-interest.

    It really depends a lot where you live. From what I heard, France kept to the intent of the EU regulation. Not raising prices, giving everyone everything for the same price. In Germany, for example, I have heard that many subscriptions also will lose the roaming feature, basically locking people to their home country.

    I am not happy at all with this regulation. Especially, that the EU Commission conceded to the telcos on many things and basically made roaming worse or more expensive for low-usage people. You can't even escape, as they made sure "permanent roaming" isn't allowed. I can't get a Polish SIM and use it permanently here in Luxembourg.

    Do note that I can't even escape to other operators nationally: they all have equally bad conditions. Some even much worse than my current one. For now I negotiated with my current operator to get the 27€ plan with a 55% discount for one year. So, I hope the markets normalize and I'll have better choice in 12 months. That is just a slim hope and I suspect I'll have to start paying the insane rates in a year.
    Perhaps, I'll just go to a pay as you go plan, with roaming pay as you go. That is allowed in the regulation, just not if you have packages. I'll lose data then. Data is extremely expensive with pay as you go.

    The worst part is that any first year economy student could have explained these consequences to them... I can't believe that they didn't have economic advisers on their overpaid panels.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Bad regulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agree. prices in Norway rose with ~ 80kr(10usd) for all normal plans. we have had free use in Scandinavia for the last ten years, and most of us dont go much further. got to love forced rules!

    2. Re:Bad regulation. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Also, you have to understand that the telco companies still have their costs when you roam. It's a bad deal for them.

      What are these costs? Half the companies operate internationally. Those that don't can work out mutual agreements with each other. You really believe it costs them €4 to give you whatever it was you used in a week in Portugal?

      All their other prices are optimised to maximise the amount they can squeeze out of their customers as it is. Increase prices, they lose customers. Decrease prices, they lose money. There's nothing else to squeeze.

    3. Re:Bad regulation. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Do I believe that? Depends a bit. Smaller operators (for example in small countries... I live in Luxembourg) will have more trouble to negotiate bit the big ones. Obviously, the big telcos have not much interest in our networks, but our operators have a big interest in their networks. In economy, that means, our operators have to pay the big ones a lot of money, because they don't have much to give back. What you essentially say is that you would like to have all telcos be totally dominated by a handful of large multinational companies. You do know that is bad for competition and thus bad for the consumer, right?

      So are Luxembourgish operators owned by "large international companies"? No. We have three: Post, which is the former State Monopoly, only operates in Luxembourg. Tango, the second one is owned by Proximus, the former Belgian State operator. Belgium, for all intents and purposes is also small and their subscriptions are just a tiny bit cheaper than ours. Then there is Orange, which is the former French State operator (France télécom), which has spread its operations all over Europe. However, they aren't dumb: since the two other operators have to keep prices high, they can keep them high too. Finally there is Join, which is just a subsidiary of Post... So that's not going to help much.

      That said, I'm sure they make a hefty profit on roaming. The thing is: I don't mind, it's cheaper for me *with* roaming: 4€ for being reachable (and calling/receiving calls without having to worry too much. It's not as if we didn't take any calls or cut each call short) is not a very big amount. Having to pay a whopping 144€/year more to get roaming under the same conditions, is unacceptable. I'd have to do 36 weeks of Portugal vacations to break even! (Actually 72 weeks, since we have two lines, both requiring 144€/year more). Do you vacation that much? I most certainly don't. Normal people don't travel that much and I live in a frigging country where you drive 50km and you're outside of the country!

      It doesn't change fact that I am now paying for people who travel a lot. By definition, people who travel a lot are larger earners. This means, the poor subsidize the the rich. Thank you EU.... /me rolls eyes.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Bad regulation. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Smaller operators (for example in small countries... I live in Luxembourg) will have more trouble to negotiate bit the big ones.

      Fortunately, the regulations also determine what the companies can charge each other.

      It doesn't change fact that I am now paying for people who travel a lot. By definition, people who travel a lot are larger earners. This means, the poor subsidize the the rich. Thank you EU.... /me rolls eyes.

      The amount made from mobile calls was small. But highly profitable, because they could charge on top of existing contracts. The difference will be fairly negligible.

      The idea of some people subsidising others is fairly meaningless. The number of minutes you get for a certain price is about market segmentation; not how much it costs them.

    5. Re:Bad regulation. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The difference will be fairly negligible.

      Are you calling 144€ per year per line "negligible"?!? Will you pay me those 288€/year I'll be missing each year because of this?!? No, of course not.. Negligible my arse...

      The number of minutes you get for a certain price is about market segmentation; not how much it costs them.

      So, my market doesn't exist (low volume calls, quite a bit of data, rarely roaming, but roaming required)? I either fit in the "roaming not allowed" or in the "get fleeced because I need roaming" market? Got that...

      For me, and many low use users, this regulation is a huge bite out of our budget. It was a monumentally bad decision.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Bad regulation. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Are you calling 144â per year per line "negligible"?!? Will you pay me those 288â/year I'll be missing each year because of this?!? No, of course not.. Negligible my arse...

      No. I'm saying it's negligible to them. It certainly doesn't cost them €144 a year to offer you roaming. But they're quite happy to raise prices for you, and blame EU regulations. Basically, your mobile operator is fleecing you and blaming EU regulations.

      So, my market doesn't exist (low volume calls, quite a bit of data, rarely roaming, but roaming required)?

      Of course it does. That segment is willing to pay €648 a year. Yes, you're in the "get fleeced" segment. It's not nice. I'm not defending the practice, but it's not because of the regulations. It's because phone companies are crooks.

  17. Re: EU GAY NIGGER AIDS CARE CANCELED FOR TOWELHEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an angry closeted gay Republican who enjoys big black cock and is ashamed of it.

  18. Big picture vs small picture by realxmp · · Score: 1

    This is not a question of simple economics you make it out to be as it involves little or no actual increase in costs to the telcos, as most of them operate across the EU anyway, just as separate companies from one group. With this they merely take a loss in premium revenue, of course they could always put prices up to try and recover that but potential competition makes that scary. So what to do? Well there is one way to save money, consolidation and that was the EU's plan to begin with.

    The EU don't really care about roaming as such, it's the principle of a single common market for selling services that they want. Right now if I buy from Amazon in the EU the majority of goods are being legally sold by Amazon EU S.a.r.L a consolidated entity for most of Amazon's EU sales. By contrast if I get a cellular contract in the EU I have to go to a different company in each country. By killing roaming the EU is actually trying to entice companies to merge their operations across countries and sell across the entire single market.

    1. Re:Big picture vs small picture by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      With this they merely take a loss in premium revenue, of course they could always put prices up to try and recover that but potential competition makes that scary

      Which is exactly what they did... Raise prices, at least where I live..

      By contrast if I get a cellular contract in the EU I have to go to a different company in each country

      If that was their intention, I should now be able to move to, for example a Polish operator and pay Polish prices and preferably even keep my number. That, however, is not allowed (there are regulations against permanent roaming). So, if that was their intention they evidently botched it seriously.

      By killing roaming the EU is actually trying to entice companies to merge their operations across countries and sell across the entire single market.

      Ah, great... so a few very large companies controlling all telco. That sounds like excellent for the customer as there is basically no competition. That ought to put down price. Gonna work for certain.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  19. Reasons of roaming fee by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Roaming costs will get moved into a different user fee.

    There are no real reasons for roaming fee nowadays except to fill the pockets of the providers.

    At worst situation for the service provider, he needs to interconnect with another provider.
    As most modern telephone back-end use voip (usually SIP), there aren't that many extra costs compared to a home call, and a cell tower is still a cell tower, no matter which country you're in.

    At best for the service provider, it's the same parent company in both countries. The client isn't really roaming, he's just using 2 different local presence of the same parent company (e.g.: O2 is present in several EU-members countries. But it's still considered roaming if you're on O2 Germany, and calling from O2 Czech republic, etc).

    So in other words, there's almost no justification for you to pay more than a few percents above what communications rates are at the local operator to which you're roaming while traveling in this country. (if it costs xxx eurocents for operator yyy to take a call for residents of a EU-country, it doesn't cost much more for the same operator to take the same call for somebody coming from abroad).
    But until recently, operator had the habit to jack up prices by an insane factor when roaming (when travelling abroad, in a not so distant past, you'd be prepared to pay between 4x and 10x what the locals pay for their calls).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]