Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Advice For a Yahoo Mail Refugee

New submitter ma1wrbu5tr writes: Very shortly after the announcement of Verizon's acquisition of Yahoo, two things happened that caught my attention. First, I was sent an email that basically said "these are our new Terms of Service and if you don't agree to them, you have until June 8th to close your account". Subsequently, I noticed that when working in my mailbox via the browser, I kept seeing messages in the status bar saying "uploading..." and "upload complete". I understand that Y! has started advertising heavily in the webmail app but I find these "uploads" disturbing. I've since broken out a pop client and have downloaded 15 years worth of mail and am going through to ensure there are no other online accounts tied to that address. My question to slashdotters is this: "What paid or free secure email service do you recommend as a replacement and why?" I'm on the hunt for an email service that supports encryption, has a good Privacy Policy, and doesn't have a history of breaches or allowing snooping.

21 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. Take Marissa's advice by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use gmail.

    1. Re:Take Marissa's advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Gmail is great in terms of reliability, spam filtering (best I've found), and features. But if you're looking for privacy, the only company that's probably worse in my mind is Facebook.

    2. Re:Take Marissa's advice by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thirded.

      Had GMail since it was invite-only, and yes - Google will scan your email for advertisement, but if all you use it for is forum updates, Slashdot notifications, signing up for games etc., then what are you honestly afraid they'll find?

      I know this borders on the whole "If you have nothing to hide" mentality, but seriously, it's email. If you're sending sensitive information, use a different MEDIUM, not a different PROVIDER.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Take Marissa's advice by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gmail is great in terms of reliability, spam filtering (best I've found), and features. But if you're looking for privacy, the only company that's probably worse in my mind is Facebook.

      What do you mean, specifically, by privacy?

      If you want to keep your family, friends, neighbors, etc. out of your email, then Gmail is great. Security is excellent, especially if you enable two-factor.

      If you want to keep random hackers out of your email, then Gmail is great. Security is excellent, especially if you enable two-factor.

      If you want to keep your ISP out of your email, then Gmail is great. It uses TLS connections for all client communications, and also with whatever other email servers it talks to that support it. Gmail-to-gmail communications is definitely encrypted all the time, both in transit and in storage.

      If you want to keep the FBI/Police out of your email, then Gmail is as good as any US-based email provider can be. They all have to provide data in response to proper subpoenas and warrants, and Google's lawyers scrutinize requests carefully.

      If you want to keep the NSA out of your email, then it's hard to say, but I suspect Gmail is quite good. Snowden revealed that the NSA was tapping Google's internal fiber, but Google has since moved to comprehensive point-to-point encryption. It's not completely impossible that the NSA has compromised the key management system that enables that, but it's actually pretty unlikely. I would assert that on this measure Gmail is as good as any large US-based email provider can be. Smaller ones may slide by the NSA because they're not interesting... but if they do become interesting they'll almost certainly be easier to pop than Google is.

      (As an aside: If the NSA is targeting you specifically for surveillance, as opposed to just sweeping you up in the dragnet, you should just give up on electronic communications entirely.)

      If you want to keep Google's advertising profile analytics software out of your email, then Gmail is awful. Your email will be scanned by systems that try to work out what you might be interested in buying, and this data will be correlated with web searches (if you don't have web history disabled), and data from other Google products. The resulting information will be used by Google (not by advertisers; they don't get access to the treasure trove) to show you ads for things you might want to buy, instead of things that you almost certainly don't want to buy.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. Run your own by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Run your own mail server, that's the only way you can be reasonably sure that you have control over your mail.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Run your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Run your own mail server, that's the only way you can be reasonably sure that you have control over your mail.

      I second what Hillary says.

      (Is it a stretch to mention the captcha is 'dwelling', as in run your own server in your dwelling?)

    2. Re: Run your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Sure?"

      Running a good, reliable mail server yourself is hard to do well. Doing good spam filtering is harder. Being secure/hackproof, harder still.

      Running your own server if you're an amateur is a terrible idea.

      Sure, you COULD spend a huge amount of time learning how to do this well, and a lot of time keeping up with patches an maintainence. But it's likely the highest cost option if you value your time at all.

  3. None by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are REALLY going to hate this, but there is no 100% secure network service. Computer networks were designed for sharing information between nodes. The idea of keeping others out of that sharing was added on later. On a large interconnected network like the Internet it is impossible to do 100%. I can feel the nerd rage boiling here and the claims that "you don't know what you are talking about!". But save it. Reality tells us otherwise. If it is on a network, it isn't secure.

  4. Don't Match by ZiakII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    has a good Privacy Policy and free

    Don't match in my experience.

  5. Email the wrong tool for privacy by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want privacy, isn't email the wrong tool? Isn't email like a post card that anyone can read in transit?

    If you want private communications, look for a different way, a private way, to communicate.

    If you want convenient email for casual use, try GMail. For example, Google will find things in your email, like confirmation emails of your upcoming flights, and then Google will be sure to remind you on your smart phone. But I don't treat communication with my airline the same as I might treat communication with other parties.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  6. Fastmail by ebonum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not free, but it works well. Note: Servers are in NY.

  7. I use two by mhollis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Apple for personal email. I have had a mac.com email address since Apple came out with it. Their current server name is "me.com" and Apple does not advertise in this service, as it is a paid-for service. It allows pop3 as well as IMAP.

    For professional email, I use gmail. Google does a great job of excising spam. It is advertiser-supported email, but I never use a web browser for my gmail account. Instead, I use the pop3 function. It propagates to my cell phone, my desktop and my tablet. When I delete something on my cell phone, it deletes on my tablet, but not on my desktop. For a free service, I do not think you can do any better than gmail.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  8. Fastmail by jeauxkewl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fastmail for the win. Reasonably priced, don't think they are going anywhere and have been ultra-reliable. I've been with them about 15 years.

  9. Use Gmail--and here is why by ebrandsberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main issue with e-mail is that it has two parties involved. If either of the parties is compromised in a communication, then it doesn't matter how secure the other party is. Due to the sheer volume of people using Gmail, it is likely they already have a copy of most of your mail anyway. By using Gmail just like so many other people, you at least only have one system potentially snooping on you. If you believe that you are more secure using other systems, you are likely wrong.

  10. Proton Mail by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've had the same question recently and the answer I got was Proton Mail, based in Switzerland. Fully encrypted end-to-end. I'm surprised someone else hasn't mentioned it by now.

  11. Proton Mail by ControlsGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Proton Mail is hosted in Switzerland has end to end encryption with Android and IOS app support and has withstood denial of service attacks from suspected state sponsored hacking.
      Just the fact that a state actor tried to take them down is a reason to consider them.

  12. Don't just get a mail provider. Get an address. by grnbrg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You are already going through the pain of changing your address. Make sure you don't have to do it again some time in the future. Mail providers change policies or shut down, sometimes without warning.

    Go ahead, and pick a mail provider that you like. But also go out and buy a personal domain. You'll probably be able to find one you like for $10 per year, and you can find DNS providers that will do mail re-direction for free. Have a wildcard redirect set to send any email sent to the domain forwarded to the new mail address. Don't like the way the provider is now doing things? Get a new provider and email address, and change the redirect.

  13. Completely agree by Calibax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been with Fastmail since it was in beta in 2001. The company ONLY does email and associated services. This means they are focused on making it work correctly and users having a good features. I would never consider moving.

  14. Re:And you were with Yahoo?!?! by unixisc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    B'cos years ago, Yahoo! was a pretty respectable company, and had loads of good stuff associated, like geocities and yahoo chat! If I recall right, it was even there ahead of Google, and were a pretty good bet when Netscape was floundering. My first webmail account was Netscape.net (under Netscape 4), then yahoo & hotmail.

    Things changed, & went downhill once Google pioneered the concept of monetizing everything on the internet - be it email, web pages and so on. The biggest evidence of that is the way MICROSOFT has changed - from a pure software company (plus some hardware) to a Google wannabe.

  15. Don't be obtuse by bradley13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't be obtuse.

    Of course there's no perfect security. You know, if a burglar wants to get into you house badly enough, he'll get in. So why bother locking your door? In fact, just leave your front door open... Oh, change all of your PINs to 1234 and your passwords to "password" while you're at it. After all, if there's no perfect security, why have any security.

    The point of TFS is finding a service that is as secure as reasonably possible, while still being useful.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  16. If you want privacy, use G Suite by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Terms of Service are actually pretty strict, and Google has extremely good data center security hygiene. The ToS on gmail are much more lax, even though it's the same software.