Slashdot Mirror


The People GoFundMe Leaves Behind (theoutline.com)

citadrianne shares a report from The Outline: President Donald Trump's proposed budget seeks to slash $54 billion from social services including programs like Medicaid and Meals on Wheels. As these resources dry up, crowdfunding websites will further entrench themselves as extra-governmental welfare providers in order to fill the gap. For a lucky few, these sites are a lifeline. For most people, they are worthless. Crowdfunding's fatal flaw is that not every campaign ends up getting the money it needs. A recent study published in the journal Social Science & Medicine found that more than 90 percent of GoFundMe campaigns never meet their goal. For every crowdfunding success story, there are hundreds of failures. "As many happy stories as there are in charitable crowdfunding, there are a lot of really worthy causes when you browse these platforms that nobody has given a cent to," Rob Gleasure, professor at the business school of the National University of Ireland, Cork told The Outline. "People haven't come across them." Feller and Gleasure's report highlighted how fickle crowdfunding can be. Of all the Razoo campaigns started in 2013, they found, more than a third didn't receive any funding at all. According to their report, donors are more likely to give to campaigns that feature lots of pictures and accompanying text.

24 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > A recent study published in the journal Social Science & Medicine found that more than 90 percent of GoFundMe campaigns never meet their goal. For every crowdfunding success story, there are hundreds of failures.

    No, assuming you are focused on GoFundMe and the study is accurate, then for every crowdfunding success story, there are tens of failures.

  2. Disappointed by halivar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm disappointed that you didn't lead with a Trump angle on the previous Sci-Hub piracy article. It's like you didn't even try. This one was better.

  3. Math is hard by Toxiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "more than 90 percent of GoFundMe campaigns never meet their goal. For every crowdfunding success story, there are hundreds of failures." -- So around 9 failures, for every success story. How did we get to hundreds?

  4. 90% don't get funded? That's a good thing. by Shoten · · Score: 4, Informative

    I assume that the mentality of the person who did the study was to compare it to conventional non-profits and the way they do fundraising. This is an important distinction because, under that model, there's a certain filtering process. If you've ever looked at a grant application, you'll see that the very nature of any of them tends to point out to you that there needs to be a valid reason for your request for funding. GoFundMe has no such filter, and as a result you get people like these three assholes or this snowflake. And those two are just what I came across by searching "Nintendo" on their site and seeing what came up in the first full set of results.

    And then there's the other thing that the filtering process does...which is help reduce the level of scamming. GoFundMe also lacks any means to do this; you see a picture and a nice bit of text but there is absolutely nothing done to validate that either are true. As a result, scams are rampant, to such a degree that there's a whole site dedicated to uncovering the scams.

    So, in short...I don't think there's anything wrong with the majority of GoFundMe campaigns failing to reach their goals. Most of them are just fucking ridiculous. And yes, I'm quite sure that some valid campaigns don't get funded as well...but 1, I would put some of the blame on the lack of any vetting process around the campaigns, and 2, that happens in the world of legitimate fundraising too. Posting a picture and type a few paragraphs describing your plight does not automatically guarantee you money...whether you are deserving or not...and that's just how life goes.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  5. GoFundMe isn't the problem. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that so many people need money because the cost of medical care is beyond their reach. The problem is that we live in a society where the ability to continue living is something that you have to "earn". The problem is that so many people are callous and devoid of empathy until it turns into a problem for them. The problem is that we refuse to care for our fellow humans.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure everyone who supports reduced government benefits feels that others should not be cared for... The vast majority, perhaps, but some seem to genuinely think that charity and altruism should do the job instead of government.

      The problem with that is, as this article shows, that funding them becomes uneven and some people are ignored. Really the only new thing here is that it's happening "on the internet". Are we supposed to be surprised that human nature is the same online as offline?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or 21st Century Eugenics? Is that what you're saying we should aspire to?

    3. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by moeinvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why shouldn't you have to "earn" what you get?

      I don't think we have a pervasive lack of compassion and empathy in our society. I think we've been brainwashed into believing that caring about others should be a mission left to government. A mission at which they fail in the most catastrophic manner.
      We're already paying for Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, SNAP, housing subsidies, heating subsidies, etc. etc. People see the fraud & abuse of these programs and naturally recoil at the thought of funding more of the same.
      Advocating for higher taxes and more or bigger government programs doesn't demonstrate how much you care. We should get government OUT of the charity business and adopt the attitude that these problems are our collective responsibility, but not through the wasteful and inefficient institution of government.

    4. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by queazocotal · · Score: 3, Informative

      " but not through the wasteful and inefficient institution of government." I am confused by what other manner it can be done.

      I caught an unfortunate virus when I was 12. It was not through anything particular that I did.
      I have never been able to work, and progressive relapses have taken me from struggling part time through university, to being almost bedbound.

      Due to struggling to keep educating myself in hopes of being able to work, and the difficulty of keeping up with a peer group, I am utterly isolated at the moment.

      In addition, I live in a rural poor area, with no church or nearby large social organisations.

      Precisely who am I supposed to appeal to for support?

      Or are you advocating that those without a close family, who have lost friends due to being able to keep up with them, who are not a member of a church or similar organisation should simply die?

    5. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We don't need to be spending a trillion dollars a year on defense when we don't even have a real enemy.

      We don't. It's actually closer to half that much. But I agree it should be cut, along with more-or-less every other government expenditure.

    6. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by ChatHuant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Government agencies aren't known for controlling overhead costs.

      Well, we could perhaps look at some studies, instead of relying on simplistic Republican slogans.
      This study calculates the overhead due to billing and insurance-related costs to 375 billion dollars annually; if Medicare was universal, the savings would be enough to cover all the uninsured and improve coverage for the under-insured. The overhead cost of Medicare is estimated to 1.5% in the USA, 1.8% in Canada. By contrast, the overhead of private insurance companies is about 13% in the USA, 16% in Canada.

      Even leaving this aside, there is a much more important issue here. The whole debate is about the wrong thing. The goal of a health care system is not to make money. It is to improve health. Lawmakers' focus should not be on finding ways to protect the income of insurance companies. They should try to find ways to improve the health of citizens. Whether insurance companies go bankrupt, need to change their business model or stop making ridiculous profits should be totally irrelevant. I believe lawmakers who instead perpetuate the current system are fundamentally betraying the reason they were put there in the first place.

    7. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by queazocotal · · Score: 2

      Precisely nowhere that I'm aware of has ever had a non-mandated by government, or directly provided by government reliable safety net for those that does not at best cope with one small social group, and ignore others in equal need.

      Perhaps you could describe such a system that has never existed throughout history?

    8. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Most of the people who are against universal healthcare are creationists (who also paradoxically describe themselves as pro-life, but their pro-life stance stops at birth).

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re:GoFundMe isn't the problem. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fortunately church "charities" are still able to use the old "convert or die" system in Africa. It's so sad that it's getting harder in the west for churches and the wealthy to control and exploit people in exchange for generously offering them a chance to live.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  6. Re:failure is a feature not a problem by ranton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Failure of a croudsource project is a feature, it indicates the lack of a market so that people don't start a company and commit to expenses when there is not a market for their product.

    At least read the summary. This is for crowdfunding the cost of insulin, surgery or chemotherapy, not starting company.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  7. Re:'Murican Health Care by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shared by people that are firmly against the Government helping do exactly what they're wanting.

    No, they're firmly against being forced, literally at the point of a gun with threat of jail time and having their possessions taken away, to be generous. Liberals LOVE to be generous with other people's money, and even more so when they can make people criminals if they're not generous in exactly the way that obeys their ideology. Asking for help from (and offering help to) like-minded people isn't even remotely the same as being forced on pain of imprisonment to do the same thing, after, of course, also being forced to pay for a huge body of government middle-men and their supporting infrastructure that do exactly nothing towards the actual expense (say, funding a surgery) being met.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  8. And I assume you didn't read the study by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    they already took out the folks just randomly asking for money. It's 90% of _medical_ campaigns that fail. But hey, you're uninformed rant probably made you feel better about not providing those 90% with life saving medical care and food/shelter while they're too sick to work, right?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:And I assume you didn't read the study by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they already took out the folks just randomly asking for money. It's 90% of _medical_ campaigns that fail. But hey, you're uninformed rant probably made you feel better about not providing those 90% with life saving medical care and food/shelter while they're too sick to work, right?

      The folks just randomly asking for money are part of the problem, even if you remove them from the study. I found out about them when I went to GoFundMe to give money to a valid cause. A person was injured while volunteering for an event that I was attending (which has a close-knit community) and was injured by an accident. Having a broken ankle and no medical insurance, he put up a GoFundMe to ask for help; it was a textbook example of what the site *should* be used for. I went there, and donated...and then in the course of that I saw just how much insanity there is. It definitely put me off...it didn't dissuade me from donating that time, because I knew about the person involved, knew what happened (I even saw them bringing him to the ambulance), and knew that it was 100% valid. But I also realized that there was absolutely no way to validate any of the other campaigns without that kind of personal connection. My rant is an indictment of GoFundMe in general, because we're talking about the model as a whole.

      Which brings me to the issue that I raised but you didn't address: scams. There are tons of scams in GoFundMe, and while some (like those that use stock art for photos) can be uncovered relatively easily with a bit of detective work, I'm willing to be that there is a significant group that are less obvious. How does the study account for them? Looking through the GoFraudMe (I bet you didn't go there, Mr. "Uninformed Rant") site, you'll note that the majority of scams fall within the exact kind of funding campaigns that are the study's focus. And that comes full-circle to my point about funding methods that have some form of due diligence behind them. Yes, I know, you can't start up a non-profit agency just to get your medical bills covered...but there are many non-profit agencies that gather funds en masse and then dole them out for cases like these.

      But let's not stop there. Let's put aside the scams, the fact that the whole model is fundamentally broken in that it begs abuse by people who feel entitled to game consoles and whatnot. Let's also include the fact that a significant number of the "medical" campaigns are for things like breast enhancement or bariatric surgery. Or this gem, which has exceeded it's $8,000 goal for hip surgery for a dog...but when I did a Google Image search of the picture, it turns out that the dog pictured belonged to Justin Bieber. How much searching did that take? I typed "surgery" into the search field on GoFundMe, hit return, picked the first item on the first page of results that had a picture rather than a video, and did an image search on the picture. What are the odds of that turning out to be a sign of a scam, if the vast majority of "surgery"-related campaigns are valid? And this case combines both the "this request is bullshit" and "this campaign is a scam" dimensions at the same time.

      So...follow the pathway of a person visiting GoFundMe, going for a totally valid reason about which they have no doubts. Add the shocking, rampant, obvious snowflakery and the subsequent discovery of large-scale scamming that goes into the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per campaign. What do you think a potential donor is going to do? I think they'll do what I do...only give money to people they know, or give it to 501(c)(3) organizations because both cases involve a lot lower risk of the money going to a scumbag instead of a person who is deserving.

      Oh, and in closing...fuck you very much for accusing that I actively deny medical care, food, and shelter to sick people and that I seek solace for trampling upon the poor. You don't know me, or anything about me, and I would bet a year's pay that I donate more to charitable causes than you do. Once you start donating money in a significant way, you start learning that not all causes are alike...and you learn to make good choices so that your donations will actually matter.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    2. Re:And I assume you didn't read the study by pnutjam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Once you start donating money in a significant way, you start learning that not all causes are alike...and you learn to make good choices so that your donations will actually matter.

      Wouldn't it be great if there was some sort of clearing house that handled your "donations" and made sure they were applied correctly, to people who really need them for medical expenses.
      Even better if the overhead was lower then any other comparable system.
      We could call it Medicare, or something like that.

  9. Re:Sigh by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    There is a wide gap between expecting something for free and expecting your country to give you a fair shot.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  10. Re:Charity doesn't work by bennebw · · Score: 2

    If you are saying that 2/3 of the world exists in 2nd or 3rd world conditions due to a failure of charity, you are assuming that charity can overcome corrupt governments and overt oppression. There is a balance between personal responsibility, charity, and government. In many areas of the world, families operate under the premise that they must care for their own. The younger generations are raised by the older and then it flips to the younger caring for the older when the time comes. When the left says that government will take care of everyone, I don't know if they know they are lying or not. It's something they tell their base so they don't feel bad about not personally doing anything to help their neighbor.

  11. Re:'Murican Health Care by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Everybody pays taxes. Some just don't declare it, but they do pay.

    But I don't get any government-provided health care.

    But you are entitled. You just have to demand it, and vote for people that will properly implement it, and grandma can get two knees for the price of one, once you deal with all the present day fraud and political corruption that makes everything so expensive.

    The economy is more than prosperous enough to trivially pay for it. You just have to make the people with all the capital pay their fair share of those taxes.

    Now, you can complain all you want about the democrats. I don't even consider them. They are worthless to the cause, same as the republicans, only there to protect their own interests.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. Re:'Murican Health Care by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    You are an American. You are entitled. Make the government serve you instead of the insurance industry. Start with a firmly worded letter, and follow through with your vote if they don't comply with your wishes.

    Whatever nonsense there is in this discussion is coming from you. Maybe it's because you choose to believe their lies. I can assure you that you nothing to gain by it. There is no shortage of fundage. It's just all tied up in the stock/derivatives markets and hoarded into offshore deposits. Free it up and we can all live like kings.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  13. Re: Why do these people deserve money? by pnutjam · · Score: 2

    Planned Parenthood provides healthcare for women, all sorts. They are the go to location for poor and young women to get healthcare.