Slashdot Mirror


Google Replaces Gchat With Hangouts Today (axios.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The day dreaded by stubborn office workers around the country has finally arrived. At some point today, Google will replace its Google Talk feature in Gmail -- known colloquially to most of the world as Gchat -- with Google Hangouts. The reasoning: Google's announcement of the switch back in March touts Hangouts' better features and integration with other Google products over the barebones Gchat, which launched way back in 2005.

178 comments

  1. Yippie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two more google services I'll never use!

  2. stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bite me. Maybe there's a reason people don't want to use $todays-messenger-from-google.

    1. Re:stubborn? by xSauronx · · Score: 2

      hangouts has been around for a while and i have long preferred it but...they really are terrible at this.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:stubborn? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo. For my part, it's because Hangouts doesn't play nice with other chat clients, such as Pidgin, whereas GTalk played nice with all of them, given that it was built on an open protocol, XMPP, rather than the proprietary protocol Hangouts uses. While it's possible to get Hangouts working in Pidgin by using some extensions that are buggy and missing key features, it's an inferior experience to what I had with GTalk.

    3. Re:stubborn? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest, it's not like gchat was that great anyway.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:stubborn? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      True, but hangouts is much worse.

    5. Re:stubborn? by thsths · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, Google Talk was fricking awesome. Especially when it still supported XMP, and there were a number of desktop and mobile clients for it.

      Now this is all history, and you have to use the sanctioned Google app, which does like to crash a lot. So yes, Google Talk was great (at some point). Hangouts is just ok.

    6. Re:stubborn? by jdavidb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I connected to google talk via pidgin via xmpp for years, up until the announcement came out that google talk was being replaced with hangouts. I think actually you can still connect to hangouts with xmpp, too.

    7. Re:stubborn? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      True, but hangouts is much worse.

      But with "better features and integration with other Google products". :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    8. Re: stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hangouts is not intended to be used with grotty third party apps written by amateurs.

    9. Re:stubborn? by higuita · · Score: 1

      and worse integration with everything else

      --
      Higuita
    10. Re:stubborn? by alexo · · Score: 1

      Pidgin (or any other libpurple-based client, like Adium) with the purple-hangouts plugin works fine for my requirements.

    11. Re:stubborn? by alexo · · Score: 1

      The purple-hangouts plugin works fine for my requirements.

    12. Re:stubborn? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      True,
      I used Google Talk with my iChat client (a old school variation of iMessanger).
      iChat was for a long time the best Yabber client on Mac OX X, but lie Google promoting Hangouts, Apple did iMessenger. No one really is using it. To buggy. If you have multiple devices both sent and "received" messages go lost (sometimes ofc. Obviously not all of them, or Apple had realized it and probably fixed it).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:stubborn? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That's the exact one I had in mind. Looks like it's been updated since the last time I installed it and has addressed some of the missing features and bugs I was speaking of, so thanks for the link!

    14. Re:stubborn? by alexo · · Score: 1

      If you find something that does not work well, open an issue.

    15. Re:stubborn? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's based on Hangouts - the entire thing is an inefficient piece of shit that can't compare with the likes of Camfrog.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:stubborn? by joemck · · Score: 1

      I'm still on Gchat. Hangouts wastes screen space with user icons, makes it less obvious who's online than the old colored dots, doesn't obey its own "compact" view setting, and lags in Firefox on my i7. It also seems more prone to convert pasted code snippets into useless emoticons.

    17. Re:stubborn? by MrLint · · Score: 1

      I am also using this plugin. Eion is also very responsive to any issues.

      Now for the gtalk side i had very good luck using app passwords when using pidgin.

      I don't know if the app passwords still work on the hangouts plugin. I had to do the handwaving to get the key to bind the plugin.

    18. Re:stubborn? by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello troll.

      Support for every possible platform.
      Video and voice support.
      Multi media support.
      Screen sharing.
      Groups (mix and match video, voice, and chat).

      Yep, pretty much sucks.

    19. Re: stubborn? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I still connect with Kopete. I think it's using XMPP. I guess I'll see what happens later today.

    20. Re:stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could still connect to google talk via xmpp, and via that you could integrate with hangouts, but that hasn't worked for me for a while, and there doesn't seem to be any official support for it anymore. XMPP support was a hold-over from Google Wave, which became Google Docs, which has its own completely-non-integrated-into-anything chat feature.

    21. Re:stubborn? by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Support for every possible platform.

      False.
      Also, gchat had even wider support since you could use any standard XMPP client.

      Video and voice support.
      Screen sharing.

      Don't need for chat, google had a better voice option, and there are far better screen sharing options (IMO).

      Multi media support.
      Groups

      GChat has these (AFAICT)

      XMPP support : gchat only
      Federation support (use your own domain): gchat only
      Client tied to the browser (at least on my platform): hangouts (this is not a good thing IMO)
      Message delivery is reliable: gchat only (many many times, I'll get hangouts messages on one of my clients and not the other, or significantly delayed on all; ex desktop and phone)
      End-to-end encryption options: 3rd party clients on gchat made this trivial; hangouts, depends if you can get it to work with another client, and if that'll keep working.

    22. Re:stubborn? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      True, but hangouts is much worse.

      False.

      Don't need for chat

      False.

      See, I can play too.

    23. Re: stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use Hangouts on my phone, but Google keeps removing features:

        - Can't merge contacts anymore.
        - No longer supports SMS.

      Now they're pushing Allo and Duo, and updating Google Voice. Clearly they don't want people to use Hangouts anymore.

    24. Re: stubborn? by thsths · · Score: 1

      Better an amateur third party program than no program at all.

    25. Re:stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Support for every possible platform.

      uhm no, neither the windows nor the linux client has ever worked for me, and those were required for the browser too... never looked at that shit again. at least stuff like skype works (even on linux)

    26. Re: stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xmpp was before wave. Writely became docs. Did you mean that Google wave became Google docs chat?

    27. Re: stubborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want you to use google's browser.

    28. Re:stubborn? by computererds · · Score: 1

      Sure you can play, but you seem to not understand the game. Otherwise, your "false" declaration would be followed by your reasons.

    29. Re:stubborn? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      So, the threshold for "troll" is "someone who says something you disagree with" now?

      My problem with hangouts isn't its feature set. It's that it performs poorly and tends to be rather buggy. Every time I've used the thing, it's been an exercise in frustration.

    30. Re:stubborn? by fastasleep · · Score: 1

      Apple's macOS product is called "Messages" and it works just fine and tons of people use it. Supports iMessage, SMS relay via iPhone, Jabber/GChat, AIM. I'm signed into all of those right now and am not having problems. It doesn't sync non-iMessage conversations on other devices though, if that's what you mean. iMessage on iOS doesn't support anything other than iMessage and SMS, which is why.

    31. Re:stubborn? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It works fine in theory.
      In practice the Mac and the iPhone and the iPad get out of synch soon and you are missing either your own messages on some of the devices or some of the answers (and yes, obviously I'm logged on with the exact same credentials on all of them). Hence I have set the SMS/messages App on my iPhone back to SMS.
      Sometimes even messages I sent from the iPhone or iPad get marked as received, but the recipient never got them (in iMessage mode).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:stubborn? by fastasleep · · Score: 1

      iMessage iCloud syncing is an upcoming feature in iOS11/macOS10.13 this fall.

  3. Time to get Slack by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    And I only mean Slackware in reference to the nerds on Slashdot.

    Slack

    (Stoot, we still don't forgive you for ending Glitch)

  4. Hangouts doesn't have specific contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad it contains a bunch of people I don't want to talk to over chat.
    GTalk contained a specific list of contacts I cared to talk to over chat (like AIM/MSN before it).
    I don't use hangouts, I don't like hangouts.

    1. Re:Hangouts doesn't have specific contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTalk forever.

    2. Re: Hangouts doesn't have specific contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICQ forever

    3. Re:Hangouts doesn't have specific contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it contains a bunch of people I don't want to talk to over chat. ...

      You must be referring to cops.

  5. Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everything since GTalk has been garbage.

    What's the problem with wanting a low-RAM-footprint, standalone chat program, that I don't have to open up aRAM-guzzling web browser to access?

    Big surprise, Google, not everybody spends every waking moment with your browser open (mostly because it's a RAM-guzzling, forced advertising dystopia.).

    Seriously, the closest they have to a standalone application for hangouts is a plug-in for Chrome. Fuck Chrome. Why would I just use a browse whose entire purpose is to advertise to me and gather as much information about me as possible.

    Firefox + Pidgin is where I'm at right now, but I'm still fuckered into using Hangouts through it because there isn't a good, truly cross-platform (I mean Windows/Linux/Mac/iOS/Android, all of them. Everything is either iOS/Android only or Windows/Mac/Linux only. WTF?) messenger that is worth a damn that I can get people to switch to.

    1. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      it's not like google would have a vested interest in you keeping your (their) browser open 24/7. They definitely wouldn't pull bullshit like this in order to nudge you in that direction. A company who's motto was 'do no evil' would never, ever employ such underhanded tactics..

    2. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still use IRC

    3. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't followed their motto in 20 years

    4. Re: Just give me back GoogleTalk by p91paul · · Score: 1

      How about telegram? it actually is cross platform and it works quite well! (even pidgin has a plugin for it)

    5. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!
      Not that I disagree with you but it seems you've missed the tag in rogoshen's post.

    6. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Telegram is cross platform, but has no voice or video calling (at the moment). https://telegram.org/

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re: Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telegram has a homegrown security protocol which cryptographers have analyzed and called untrustworthy. You are better off using IRC or Signal if you want security.

    8. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Android/iOS cellphone app has encrypted voice calling since a couple months. Don't know about the official desktop client though (the web client didn't have it last I checked).

    9. Re: Just give me back GoogleTalk by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Only morons trust something like their phone number to some unknown group of so-called 'programmers.'

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Telegram has a shitty desktop client to boot with a horrible user list.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I use it on a Mac.
      It looks quite fine, no real "difference" to other chat applications.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      Firefox + Pidgin is where I'm at right now, but I'm still fuckered into using Hangouts through it because there isn't a good, truly cross-platform (I mean Windows/Linux/Mac/iOS/Android, all of them. Everything is either iOS/Android only or Windows/Mac/Linux only. WTF?) messenger that is worth a damn that I can get people to switch to.

      You know why there isn't a free alternative? You might want to sit down for this .... stuff like this costs money.

      Why would I just use a browse whose entire purpose is to advertise to me and gather as much information about me as possible.

      Because you are not willing to pay for such a service, and as a reasonably rational human you understand that if someone is offering a good, x-platform chat service, they has to be some sort or motivation for them to build, maintain, and support said service.

    13. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Khyber · · Score: 1

      https://screenshots.en.sftcdn....

      If you call that usable/looks fine you must have the IQ of a special needs student.

      Camfrog's user interface for the Desktop is 1,000x better.

      And doesn't require my fucking phone number.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense to IRC, because this is a fair response, but every time I have used IRC in my life, the experience has never screamed "user friendly," which sadly means the vast majority of the contacts I like to chat with currently on Google's services would be extremely unlikely to ever make the switch and meet me there. Which, of course, undermines the whole point of attempting to get my own contact list to switch over as well.

    15. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I don't blame the GP. Slashdot's software will eat HTML tags if you're not careful. "<Sarcasm>Google isn't evil </Sarcasm>" has to be expressed as
      "&lt;Sarcasm&gt;Google isn't evil &lt;/Sarcasm&gt;"

      And further the above line had to be expressed as
      "&amp;lt;Sarcasm&amp;gt;Google isn't evil &amp;lt;/Sarcasm&amp;gt;"

      At least I didn't need Unicode characters.

    16. Re: Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here, and agreed. While security isn't my number one concern, it would be a nice benefit (I mean, I most not be that worried about it or I wouldn't still be letting Google see every conversation I have...). However, I would almost just rather turn to Slack (which a personal friend just told me is fully cross platform in the way I want), but it also isn't exactly what I am looking for in a lot of ways, either.

      The big thing for most of my contact list comes down to usability. Some of them are interested in privacy through cryptography, but most of those just use Signal, which obviously only really functions for texting and voice calls.

      I just wish there were more options than trying to teach everyone I know how to connect to a different XMPP server than Google's, or telling them to use the super user unfriendly IRC, or just having to rely on Signal, which means I can never have an at-ease conversation typing comfortably at my keyboard instead of being buried in a tiny screen typing with my thumbs, taking twice as long to say anything substantial, and get tired of typing like that after maybe five minutes.

      Ugh.

    17. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm tags are akin to sitcom laugh tracks: if you need them, you're probably doing something wrong.

    18. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big surprise, Google, not everybody spends every waking moment with your browser open

      Actually, I think almost everybody does exactly that. Go walk around an office building, or a college student building, or anywhere else that you see lots of peoples' computer screens. In my (anecdotal, obviously) experience the majority are actively using the browser and essentially all of the rest have a browser down in the taskbar.

      Your mileage varies obviously, but I'll bet the GTalk/Hangouts team at Google has actual data on how many of their users use the browser vs mobile app vs other client... and I'd be surprised if the "other client" category isn't measured in hundredths of a percent, or thousandths. Of course, in Google's case that still probably constitutes hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of people, but that doesn't change the fact that Google's engineering effort is best spent on the interface used by 99.99+% of the users.

    19. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It does not look like this on my Mac.

      Never heard about Camfrog, another chat client?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Telegram does not really require your phone number, it only needs one to verify your account.
      What is wrong with that?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    21. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What's the problem with wanting a low-RAM-footprint, standalone chat program, that I don't have to open up aRAM-guzzling web browser to access?

      Skype is using 40MB of system memory, Telegram is using 38MB on my Windows 10 system. What's the issue exactly?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    22. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Telegram is cross platform, but has no voice

      Yes it does, stop lying.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    23. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Why not use another IRC client then that is user friendly? I use the Twitch website, which seems to work well, with no usability issues for me.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    24. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by sanf780 · · Score: 1

      May I suggest Facebook Messenger? /duck

    25. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, google is the last instant messenger to go full evil. Everybody else that anybody uses already has, so there's nowhere left to talk to people.

      Who's at fault? Probably the common user, who demands evil. They actually want to chat through today's trendy weird proprietary phone app, not open protocols.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    26. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      You know why there isn't a free alternative? You might want to sit down for this .... stuff like this costs money.

      There are tons of free alternatives. The problem is an IM client that your friends aren't on is worthless, and advertising costs a lot of money.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    27. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Stop lying.
      Are you an idiot or what?

      If I don't know something you know, it is not a ly, fucking moron.

      My Telegram app on my iPad has no voice calls. Idiot!

      I can press a button to record my voice and then send to my chat partner.

      Get a damn clue what a "lie" is, asshole.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    28. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      If I don't know something you know

      Stop being ignorant and spreading false information.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    29. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by nasch · · Score: 1

      Slack? That has Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS, and web clients. And it's very nice, and has a free tier. The main thing the free tier doesn't include (from my perspective anyway) is group audio and video calls - two party only.

    30. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by ogdenk · · Score: 2

      That IRC and various other IM clients used to run on machines with 16MB of total RAM or less, some supporting multiple interactive users. If your just throwing text w/ hyperlinks and images around, why would you think 38MB of RAM is reasonable? Hell, I used to engage in multiparty online chats with machines with 64K of RAM.

      What's wrong with wanting software that does one thing and does it well? Web browsers are for viewing hypertext documents with images. Web browsers were never meant to be the catch-all computing platform of the future and all the kludges to make them so have resulted in a patchwork bloated mess.

    31. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Camfrog is a killer chat client focused on multi-video realtime chat. Try HUNDREDS of cameras at once.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    32. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Broken phone? Changed phone number? Only have a land line? They store that phone number for future verification purposes (say if you install on a new machine and log into that account,) and if they get breached that's a ripe database for abuse? Should I keep going?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    33. Re: Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Wire. It's cross-platform, has audio capabilities, and is probably more secure than Google Talk / Hangouts.

    34. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    35. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use whatever old or new IM service that you have not used before, and then advertise to your contacts about how you can be reached (not necessarily via mass mail). People still use business cards, e-mail signatures, social networking profiles, and other non-intrusive means to communicate this information.

    36. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The browser is Google's primary OS. Most of their apps run on it, and it runs almost everywhere. You can hardly blame them for making it their platform of choice for desktop.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Someone should build a distributed chat system that removes the need for central coordinating servers and as an added bonus provides TOR-like privacy using onion routing.

      Clients would keep lists of other clients and share them on request. Some mechanism would be needed to ensure that clients can find each other, which is probably the most challenging part. Maybe support for ad-hock servers could be added, so people could contribute to the network if they wanted to and speed up locating clients, but in a way that ensured a bad actor couldn't poison it (again, TOR has all this stuff figured out).

      The only server required would be for bootstrapping access to the distributed network.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      why would you think 38MB of RAM is reasonable

      It's probably not 38MB of actual RAM, most of it is probably shared memory, mapped files that are only loaded on demand and the like. But okay, let's say 38MB for the sake of argument.

      The reason we have so many apps now, available at the low price of free, and with fairly advanced features yet still reasonably secure and stable is that we moved away from trying to save every byte and instead concentrated on making better apps.

      I used to run those old IRC clients that only took a few dozen kilobytes of RAM. I remember when someone figured out you could crash AmIRC with a malformed string, and of course since there was no memory protection it would crash your whole machine and force a reboot. I'll gladly throw some RAM at adding memory protection - my machine has many gigabytes of it and even if I run out my SSD can page stuff at 550MB/sec. For comparison my old Amiga, fully upgraded with a 68060, could manage 1/10th of that reading from RAM.

      We traded efficiency for quality and ease of development.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes continue please,
      as those scenarios rarely happen in real life.
      I use not even my own phone number to verify for a new device ... and you can change the phone number on the registration web site anyway.

      There needs to be a way to quickly verify/add new devices and phone number with SMS is the most easiest way to do that.

      If you don't like that, up to you. But cursing and swearing about it is rather stupid.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    40. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Spreading false information because someone is ignorant is not a lie. Get it or die, oh, only wrote that because of the lame rhyme :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And you missed the point: my Telegram app on my iPad and on my Mac has no voice call option
      So perhaps the latest release has? No idea!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    42. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      If your just throwing text w/ hyperlinks and images around, why would you think 38MB of RAM is reasonable?

      Nah, I have voice chat, videos and embedded webpage content too. Seems reasonable to me? If I was just doing text on Telegram, it would be using less memory I imagine.

      Hell, I used to engage in multiparty online chats with machines with 64K of RAM.

      So did I, but I don't really want to go back to the BBS days.

      What's wrong with wanting software that does one thing and does it well?

      I never said anything was wrong with that?

      Web browsers are for viewing hypertext documents with images.

      A web browser is for presenting and interacting with content from the world wide web.

      Web browsers were never meant to be the catch-all computing platform of the future

      Indeed, they were meant to present content on the world wide web.

      all the kludges to make them so have resulted in a patchwork bloated mess.

      That's only because this content is being pushed into the world wide web, the webbrowser is still doing it's job.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    43. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      It's probably not 38MB of actual RAM, most of it is probably shared memory

      The Telegram desktop client is a c++ Qt application that doesn't have really any dependencies. It's actually quite cleanly built which is why I like it.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    44. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Pidgin is not available for Android. Don't know if for iPhone, don't care. I am rather annoyed with this, since most of the choices for accessing open chat protocols on Android look...iffy.

    45. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Telegram does not really require your phone number, it only needs one to verify your account.
      What is wrong with that?

      I don't know anything about Telegram specifically, but unless it's actually using the phone number for some feature (exchanging SMS, maybe?), then everything is wrong with that.

    46. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      40megs for a chat program is a long, long way from being "low memory usage".

    47. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Neither of them are just chat programs and nor is Google Hangouts.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    48. Re:Just give me back GoogleTalk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      unless it's actually using the phone number for some feature (exchanging SMS, maybe?)

      It's using phone numbers for:

      - Address book, to identify existing people on Telegram. It works as well as whatsapp, imessage etc. at this.
      - SMS verification to both create and access existing accounts.
      - Preventitive measure to fight against mass account creation by spammers etc.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  6. So What. by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm unimpressed to be quite honest. If an app is any good, a user will use it until something better comes along. Google can't understand that and they force users into their versions of whatever popular app exists. Google+ was an example of this kind of shakedown. It's terrible. Facebook is no better but Google+ was simply awful.

    If something is good people will use it. Youtube is good so people use it all the time... but Youtube administrative causes a lot of users big trouble. Look at people who lose their revenue because some professional squatting company comes along and files bogus DCMAs against legitimate Youtube users who were merely applying the fair-use rules appropriately in the first place.

    Google doesn't really care about you. They don't care about your audience or your beliefs or values. They just want to force their own profit margins and grow their garden of trust until the next big harvest.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:So What. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      youtube users who were merely applying the fair-use rules appropriately in the first place.
      I would say it is pretty difficult to use youtube in a "fair-use sense".

      and files bogus DCMAs against legitimate Youtube
      Filing bogus DCMAs is obviously super easy.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:So What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will use whats most hyped, not whats best.

    3. Re:So What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youtube users who were merely applying the fair-use rules appropriately in the first place.
      I would say it is pretty difficult to use youtube in a "fair-use sense".

      and files bogus DCMAs against legitimate Youtube
      Filing bogus DCMAs is obviously super easy.

      Do you understand what "fair use" means? If I make a video reviewing something and I use small snippets demonstrating the product, say a clip from a movie or a game, that is, by US copyright law, fair use. I'm not infringing on the copyright of that product.

      That's a very basic example of fair use. The problem is anyone can come along (literally, anyone) and click "Claim copyright" and fill out a small form and get a video DCMA'd WITHOUT PROOF.

      You are explicitly told you are electronically signing a legal form and misrepresenting yourself and the claim you are breaking the law, but it's still done to troll people. Or even worse, when large companies want to try and silence people. Don't like a negative review of your product? File a DCMA takedown on the video and claim it's violating your copyright. Bam, video is pulled, and the company gets to stroke itself at the thought that it silenced a critic. You as the YouTuber mean nothing. Google cares not one shit about your rights being violated. You can cite all the US fair use laws you want, but they do nothing. Except you know, permanently ban your YouTube account if you try to stand up for yourself (and believe me, they tell you this up front. You get one chance to dispute a claim. And the only thing they do is turn around to the claimant and say "Are you sure this is encroaching your copyright?" and all they have to do is say yes again. After that if you try to dispute it again, they flat-up close your account. Permanently.)

      I've personally had videos have claims placed on them for ridiculous reasons. In one you can hear a small portion of a song that was playing on an outdoor speaker at a restaurant in the distance. I got a copyright claim by the company who handles the song rights in Germany. The snippet of the song was totally accidental, and covered by three separate fair use clauses.

      1. It was an incidental recording.
      2. The focus of the video was not the copyrighted material.
      3. It was a small portion of the copyrighted material.

      I disputed it citing those clauses under US law. Came back denied, the claim upheld, and a warning about not disputing it further lest they close my account. And the video remains blocked in certain countries.

      Google, a US company, is ignoring US laws in deference to large corporations.

  7. and still no way to search through Hangouts by urbster1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    other than in Gmail on a desktop PC browser. why no search feature in the Hangouts app, Google? for some reason I thought you were supposed to be good at searching

    1. Re:and still no way to search through Hangouts by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Google good at searching? Maybe through your e-mails and any personal data they can get their hands on. Otherwise Ducky FTW!

    2. Re:and still no way to search through Hangouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't even manage partial-word search in gmail

  8. XMPP service by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Currently the XMPP server is still available (and can chat to Google Hangout users)
    For now.
    Let's hope that Google will at least maintain this access.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:XMPP service by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I have about 80 contacts on Skype.
      90% of my phones address book is either on
      - Viber
      - Telegram
      - or on WhatsApp (which I no longer use as it refuses to upgrade/install on my old iOS version)

      A good deal is on iMessenger (but we don't use it, it is to buggy)

      I had about 10 contacts on GTalk.
      I have 2 on Hangout (both on GTalk, too).

      I even have one KiK contact ... don't remember how that happened.

      The chance that any of my contacts migrate to Hangout is basically ZERO.
      On my Desktop I don't use it, unless one of my 2 contacts needs to call me urgently.

      BECAUSE I DON'T USE WEB APPS ON A DESKTOP COMPUTER!!!! Google get that, or die in flames.

      You can not "alt tab" from app to app to browser tab, can't be so hard to grasp. And Chrome like Safari, is to dumb to have an "all tabs" menu, only "all windows" ... how am I supposed to find my hang outs tab?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:XMPP service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BECAUSE I DON'T USE WEB APPS ON A DESKTOP COMPUTER!!!! Google get that, or die in flames.

      I'm sure Google will choose its billions of happy web app users over you.

      It's not just Google, either. The market has spoken, and EVERYTHING is a web app (or mobile), except the handful of things that the web can't quite handle yet, and that space is small, and shrinking.

      You can not "alt tab" from app to app to browser tab, can't be so hard to grasp.

      Ctrl+Tab. Ctrl+Shift+Tab to go the other way.

      And Chrome like Safari, is to dumb to have an "all tabs" menu, only "all windows" ... how am I supposed to find my hang outs tab?

      In my case, Hangouts are on the email tab, which is pinned to the leftmost tab and which I can access instantly with Ctrl+1. Calendar is pinned in the second tab, accessible with Ctrl+2. Ctrl+3-Ctrl-9 access the next seven tabs. I rarely know what's on them, exactly, but Ctrl+ gets me close to the tab icon I'm looking for and then Ctr+Tab (I always aim to hit to the left, so I don't have to reach for the shift key).

      That's on my desktop (Ubuntu w/Cinnamon). On my Macbook the Ctrl+ keys don't work. But OS X is severely deficient in keyboard navigation in general, so everything has me reaching for the trackpad constantly anyway. The browsers aren't much better, but they're not much worse.

    3. Re:XMPP service by vslee · · Score: 1

      There is also an official Hangouts extension for Chrome. With this, Hangouts opens in its own window/app which you can then alt-tab to.

    4. Re:XMPP service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do Ctrl+PgUp and Ctrl+PgDn to switch between tabs left and right, but it's not supported on some versions of Internet Explorer (certainly 7.0). That way, you won't have to use Ctrl+Shift+Tab for the previous tab. I use that often, because the right Ctrl and PgUp/PgDn buttons are within the grasp of my right-hand fingers, along with the Backspace button, which I use to browse back one page.

      Alt+Tab is useful when switching between windows. When using the web version of Hangouts, a chat can be moved into a separate window. This may be convenient in some situations.

      The web version of Hangouts (hangouts dot google domain) also has a compact view, which shows the active/inactive state of users, but these are the only activity settings. The compact view can be turned on in the Settings inset.

    5. Re:XMPP service by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It opens its own window, but it is still a "Chrome Window"
      So no: you can not alt tab to it. At least not on a Mac with "command-tab".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:XMPP service by swillden · · Score: 1

      So no: you can not alt tab to it. At least not on a Mac with "command-tab".

      You can use command-~ to switch between windows of an app. I considered OS X badly broken until I discovered this. Now it's only somewhat broken.

      Also, as an AC mentioned Ctrl-Tab works to switch between tabs in Chrome. This works fine on OS X.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  9. They should do way more by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    While I am not entirely happy with this move, my sincere hope is that Google will improve its YouTube app, both on desktop/Chrome and Android with addition of a feature that lets the video remain visible as I browse comments.

    This isn't so hard.

    I have submitted many requests for this but they just seem not to listen, sadly.

    1. Re:They should do way more by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      You actually read YouTube comments? Personally, I'm not quite that masochistic.

    2. Re:They should do way more by swb · · Score: 1

      Repair videos.

      I kind of hate them, but occasionally they are useful and I often find links or other valuable info about the repair in the comments.

      A lot of the time they are low view videos, so there's not 8 billion shitposts to filter through, either. The latest game of thrones preview or some other popular content? Forget it. It's like someone gave accounts to the lowest IQ creature that can type.

    3. Re:They should do way more by kiminator · · Score: 1

      The Android app does this now (and presumably iOS, though I haven't checked). I do think that hiding the comments below the suggested videos is a bit of a clunky user interface, but the video is kept playing. But yes, it'd be nice if the video was kept in view at all times on the desktop website.

      Not sure what this has to do with Hangouts, though. The two apps come from very different teams within Google.

  10. ... and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... still nobody uses it.

  11. Google Voice.. by PPNSteve · · Score: 1

    I still use Gchat because Google Voice integrates into it quite well, i can easily make calls, screen incoming,and manage contacts all in one place. It also has a nice and simple low resource usage chat feature, I really hope they change their mind or at least provide the same functions for voice in Hangouts. (last time I checked, 3 weeks ago, they didn't).

    --
    PPN
  12. No need to worry. by sootman · · Score: 1

    It's Google -- they'll change it again in a couple years.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  13. What's wrong with barebones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Why would I want a fancy completely different web interface for every damn piece of functionality with companies like Google pulling together all the data in the background from their proprietary offerings?

    Barebones stuff tends to be of the kind where I have the chance to use Emacs/Gnus as an interface and _actually_ get to work coherently with text on my _own_ computer rather than have somebody else pull the strings and decide just which strings I might get access to.

  14. Google is just whitting down and down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean beyond Gmail, the app store, and Android, I don't think I use anything else from Google beyond search.
    I wouldn't use Android, but there really isn't anything better out there.

    How long before they make gmail unusable in a browser, or even yet, force you to Inbox (shudders)

  15. Trust me here, now. by thegreatbob · · Score: 2

    You want this. Why? Because Google wants you to want it. /logic

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  16. As a stubborn office worker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, I have dreaded this day.

    1. Re:As a stubborn office worker... by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Much as you dread every work day.

  17. "better features" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Not so much,.

    gtalk had a better UI, a smaller memory footprint, supported voice calls that didn't sound like ass.

    I think it might have been my favorite desktop chat app.

  18. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only luddites use APK

  19. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey retard, you already posted this.

  20. This will work as well as FB chat by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I used FB chat when it first came out, and then realized 90 percent of it was people not reading my FB post, so I stopped using it, other than for family and a few individuals.

    Same will happen with Gchat and G hangout. I used Google circles, but they just get in the way.

    Same take home message: Stop Being Pervy.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apk's outfoxes you. You blow your downmodpoints he reposts https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10788413&cid=54693095/. Why's the best you got a bogus downmod? You can't prove him validly technically wrong is why. Hahahahaha.

  22. My Only Reason to use Hangouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the Video Chat feature as it simply works on droid. I have a tablet, my brother has a tablet, both have droid on them and both have Hangouts available. Simply put, it's a no brainer for us to video chat on our tablets along with any other family members that want to. Pretty nice and it's fucking stable on droid - forget Skype as MS keeps scewing with the clients (where's the latest for FreeBSD?)

  23. Why? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Google's been treating Hangouts as the red-headed step-child now for a couple of years. They've more or less completely deprecated it on Android, where it's no longer either their SMS system (Messages) or their recommended apps for IM (Allo) or video chat (Duo.)

    So... why NOW switch all GMail users to Hangouts? There's literally nothing in Hangouts that isn't being done by Google's own preferred alternatives to Hangouts.

    Don't get me wrong, I kinda like Hangouts, and I was annoyed when they removed non-Google Voice SMS from it, but it still doesn't make sense: if you're going to deprecate an app, and Google is deprecating Hangouts, why force people to use it?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Why? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hm ...
      I have a brand new Android device, well 6 weeks old. A Lenovo Yoga Book.

      their recommended apps for IM (Allo) or video chat (Duo.)

      Those apps are not on it. Hangout is, but I don't remember if I installed it (I think I did).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Why? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      What's installed by default generally depends on the vendor and age of the Android distribution. Google's been steering itself away from insisting on the entire app suite being pre-installed and leaving it to just some critical ones like the Google Play Store.

      But yes, Allo and Duo are the recommended apps for IM and video chat, despite Hangouts containing perfectly serviceable functionality in both spheres. I don't understand what was so bad about Hangouts they felt the need to implement them.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  24. Hangouts was tolerable until they nuked Effects by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Hangouts was tolerable until they nuked Effects. The sad trombone was the unofficial meeting sound...

  25. GTalk was based on Jabber by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hangout is one of the most ugly programs I have ever used. (yes I use the App on Android, and used to use it on iPad until it got discontinued (( for my iOS version? )) ...)
    No idea what UI designers think, probably there was none ...

    Why one is replacing a Jabber based communication system with a Hangout bullshit is beyond me.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by swillden · · Score: 1

      Hangout is one of the most ugly programs I have ever used

      What's ugly about it? Don't like green?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      The fact that you don't see the edges of "controls" ??

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by swillden · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'm not sure what you mean. Looks like any other Material Design app to me. Perhaps I'm just used to MD, but it all seems very straightforward to me.

      I'm looking at the app and I don't see anything that needs edges but doesn't have them. In the list of conversation threads there are no lines between conversations but each is represented as a horizontal section with photo of the person, name and last message and time. I can tap anywhere on these conversation "bars" to open the conversation.

      In the conversation view, I see the standard conversation bubbles plus a field on the bottom (clearly delineated) where I can type. The top has a heading bar with a back arrow, name of the other person and time since they've been online, plus icons for starting a video chat or phone call.

      Tastes differ, but it seems functional, easy to use and even pretty. But then, I like the clean look of Material Design.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, the name "Material Design" is completely misleading.
      It could be called "boring computer interface" there is nothing "material" in it.
      E.g. look at the original iOS iBooks App or Calendar App.

      The book app looked like a real book, not like a floating screen of text. The main reason why I'm on iOS 7 on my iPad and don't upgrade.

      Yeah, the UI of Hangout "works" ... but I hate it anyway :D Can not use it right now, as I would need to log of with my "youtube account" and log on with my "gmail/hangouts account" to find some specifics.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by swillden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the UI of Hangout "works" ... but I hate it anyway :D Can not use it right now, as I would need to log of with my "youtube account" and log on with my "gmail/hangouts account" to find some specifics.

      Oh, I thought we were talking about the mobile apps.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re: GTalk was based on Jabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop commenting on your employers stories pretending to not have a dog in the hunt. It's a bad look dude.

    7. Re: GTalk was based on Jabber by swillden · · Score: 1

      Please stop commenting on your employers stories pretending to not have a dog in the hunt. It's a bad look dude.

      I have no "dog in the hunt". Yes, my employer is Google (as I often point out, and as is mentioned prominently in my slashdot bio), but that really has no impact on my thought about the quality of the Hangouts app, or material design. If I thought it sucked, I'd say so.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:GTalk was based on Jabber by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, google in its wisdom decided that from one day to the other the iPad version stopped working.

      And there is no upgrade for my OS available.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  26. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look above everyone to see something that speaks like a racist Jar-Jar Binks

    It should go and take its mincy little faggot balls somewhere else

    Now watch as it threatens me

    I bet it belongs to the Church of Scientology or would they even kick that crazy out

  27. Good news for Slack by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Out of the many chatting/messaging/video config things I have tried, by far I hated hangouts the worst. It always seemed to have problems, the UI I remember being really poor, and it just was not as effective as other things for team communication...

    I can only imagine how many groups will be driven into the willing arms of Slack because of this.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Good news for Slack by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Slack doesn't have useful video or voice chat so those who need it won't be moving to Crack or Shitcord any time soon.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  28. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, APK is now posting to support himself because he is such a retard.

  29. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha apk outfoxed ya again! Ya blew yer downmodpoints. He'll just post again https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... u lose, loser and you're clearly the retard he outfoxes every time. Hahahaha!

  30. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm indifferent to this. I don't care. I have no stake in it. But I enjoy watching nerds raging and screaming and stomping their feet. It's so funny.

  31. APK Proves his racism by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "Joogle" = Jewish Google.

    Now you know that your 'security product' is written by a racist fuck.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:APK Proves his racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a racist fuck, he's just a stupid fuck.

  32. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Khyber · · Score: 1
    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  33. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Khyber · · Score: 1
    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  34. Discord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've abandoned hangouts in favor of a better platform, Discord.

  35. Google and social skills by benjonson · · Score: 1

    Look at Google's hiring criteria. Gee, They don't do well with social media? But the IQs are enormous! Hire based on social skills if you want to do social media.

    --
    =-+
  36. Never ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... heard of it.

    I have more Gmail accounts than Carter has little liver pills.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  37. Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "as Vice President of one of the oldest mineralogical societies in California" - by Khyber ( 864651) on Saturday February 18, 2017 @11:53PM (#53894687)

    SanQuentin prison breaking rockpile rocks != "minerological surveys" & you = criminal https://openpasts.com/PublicRecord/ALEX-MCQUOWN/1578057922825639/ or http://www.findmugshots.com/arrests/alex_marshall_mcquown_id_2334096.html/

    R o T f L m A o @ U, Khyber - threatening judges & DA's? DUMB! Threatening me w/ lawsuits too? Well, where is it you penniless bullshitter https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10245269&cid=53924785/

    Good luck against truth shown above - You're known as a criminal whacko!

    APK

    P.S.=> I wrote nothing about JEWS (whom I have zero against in TRUE jews, there's some in my bloodline & best pals have been TRUE jews - however, not what St. John called "the synagogue of Satan" in Pharisee Khazars Jesus kicked out of the temple) - only JOOgle!

    Learn to read, jailbird probation boy - JEWS also aren't a race. Judaism is a RELIGION they follow you pitiful weak stupid moron, lol (racist? Not)... apk

    1. Re:Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Good luck against truth shown above - You're known as a criminal whacko!"

      Yea, which is why the members of the city council are currently reaming the local authorities a new one for malicious prosecution and violation of due process - you keep on spreading those lies, because it's really easy to catch you in them and then act against you by them. :D

      I wonder, do you make enough money from your HOSTs file and other 'works' to protect your ass against a defamation of character and libel lawsuit, bitch boy?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Khyber · · Score: 1

      >Penniless bullshitter.

      Yea, yet I hold so much raw and cut gem in my hands that you'd be dwarfed in your measly-ass income.

      I rip through 4x4 vehicles yearly and just get a new one.

      *yawn*

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Khyber · · Score: 1

      >Good luck against truth shown above

      All you showed was a story about arrest. Notice there's nothing about a conviction, dumbass?

      I love having the city council on my side, ripping the local departments new assholes over their violating of my rights, hiding exonerating evidence (hint: the e-mail header shows the e-mail is fake. District Attorney and Sherriff's office colluded to hide that evidence.)

      Oh man the lawsuit against you is going to be so great. I've got your ass dead to rights. It's so easy to just give you the rope and let you hang yourself. You do it so willingly.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  38. Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "as Vice President of one of the oldest mineralogical societies in California" - by Khyber ( 864651) on Saturday February 18, 2017 @11:53PM (#53894687)

    SanQuentin prison breaking rockpile rocks != "minerological surveys" & you = criminal https://openpasts.com/PublicRecord/ALEX-MCQUOWN/1578057922825639/ or http://www.findmugshots.com/arrests/alex_marshall_mcquown_id_2334096.html/

    R o T f L m A o @ U, Khyber - threatening judges & DA's? DUMB! Threatening me w/ lawsuits too? Well, where is it you penniless bullshitter https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10245269&cid=53924785/

    Good luck against truth shown above - You're known as a criminal whacko!

    APK

    P.S.=> I wrote zero about JEWS (whom I have zero against in TRUE jews, there's some in my bloodline & best pals have been TRUE jews - however, not what St. John called "the synagogue of Satan" in Pharisee Khazars Jesus kicked out of the temple) - only JOOgle!

    Learn to read, jailbird probation boy - JEWS also aren't a race. Judaism is a RELIGION they follow you pitiful weak stupid moron, lol (racist? Not)... apk

  39. Why is it not useful? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have not yet used the video/voice features they added to Slack, what's wrong with them?

    To me that hardly matters as it's so easy to Skype/Facetime anyone as needed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cease and desist your criminal actions immediately, APK. You are making people a 3rd party your violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act!

  41. Khyber = Alex McClown ex-con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "as Vice President of one of the oldest mineralogical societies in California" - by Khyber ( 864651) on Saturday February 18, 2017 @11:53PM (#53894687)

    SanQuentin prison breaking rockpile rocks != "minerological surveys" & you = criminal https://openpasts.com/PublicRecord/ALEX-MCQUOWN/1578057922825639/ or http://www.findmugshots.com/arrests/alex_marshall_mcquown_id_2334096.html/

    R o T f L m A o @ U, Khyber - threatening judges & DA's? DUMB! Threatening me w/ lawsuits too? Well, where is it you penniless bullshitter https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10245269&cid=53924785/

    Good luck against truth shown above - You're known as a criminal whacko!

    APK

    P.S.=> I wrote zero about JEWS (whom I have zero against in TRUE jews, there's some in my bloodline & best pals have been TRUE jews - however, not what St. John called "the synagogue of Satan" in Pharisee Khazars Jesus kicked out of the temple) - only JOOgle!

    Learn to read, jailbird probation boy - JEWS also aren't a race. Judaism is a RELIGION they follow you pitiful weak stupid moron, lol (racist? Not)... apk

  42. Uggh... don't like it by moronikos · · Score: 1

    I much prefer Lync. My company changed hands for the 3rd time in 3 years and the new overlords have standardized on GOffice. Gosh I hate it. Google does have better mail search, but just about everything else is better in Microsoft's products. I really hate the calendar app and find Outlook's calendar to be so much better.

  43. signal by spankymonker · · Score: 1

    Can't we just agree to use signal? Text, voice, video, encryption, easy to use. Why do we stick with these inferior alternatives.

  44. Re:Replace slowing/infecting/tracking Joogle ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cease your crap fraud playing wannabe attorney. Go sell your bullcrap someplace else.

  45. /.ers like & use it: You did better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    * My code's liked + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject & answer the question "Forrest" (RUN, Forrest - RUN!!!) or are you going to 'downmod hide' it again? Everyone sees it stupid, lol... apk

  46. Google Ghetto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for them to use the name "Google Ghetto" for, uh, something.

  47. HEY JUDE (beatles) explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews believe this about others they call goyim/gentiles: Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Perrone, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No:

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it."

    22. Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean."

    23. Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid."

    Really nice people guess all nations are nazis (egypt "despoiling" robbing it, Romans under titus, russian pogro

  48. HEY JUDE (beatles) explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews believe this about others they call goyim/gentiles: Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Perrone, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No:

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it."

    22. Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean."

    23. Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid."

    Really nice people guess all nations are nazis (egypt "despoiling" robbing it, Romans under titus, russian pogro

  49. HooliChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, who else thinks changing to a HooliChat log-in is hella lame?

  50. For how long? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Before they ditch hangouts for Duo, Allo, or what they just had in mind this week.

    --
    bickerdyke
  51. Ugh.. by Altrag · · Score: 1

    Given Google's history:

    better features

    So useless features, or awesome features that they'll remove next year.

    integration with other Google products

    That you can't avoid, even if you don't want integration (and god forbid you have say, two Google accounts -- its a giant crapshoot which one will be "active" at any particular time. Not that Google is the only company that doesn't believe you may want to do something like have separate work and personal accounts. Skype anyone?)

    And I'm sure Hangouts won't be happy to accept the fact that I'd hidden chat a long time ago. It will jump back in my face and be as annoying as possible until I can figure out how to get rid of it again, since I use it exactly never nor do I have any need or desire to start using it.

    I wish they'd just leave gmail alone. It used to be awesome.. and its still better than many mail systems.. but they seem determined to slowly degrade it. Maybe they're trying to find the tipping point where users won't put up with this kind of shit anymore.

  52. LOL - prove it, jailbird bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL - prove it, jailbird bitch

    APK

    P.S.=> I would love to play Monopoly w/ you - I bet you'd NEVER take the "GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD", lol - as you miss the ASSFUCKINGS you got there (lmao) - come on now whimp - you KNOW it's true... lol! apk

  53. The BIG black men miss you in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khyber = EVERY MAN'S GIRLFRIEND in the 'jailhouse showers', RoTfLmAo https://openpasts.com/PublicRecord/ALEX-MCQUOWN/1578057922825639/... You up the ass fucking JAILBIRD 110lb. whimp. I bet you MISS the MEN in there, lo1!

    2nd time you threatened me w/ lawsuit - so WHERE IS IT punk jailbird bitch? It's not. It never WILL be ya penniless bitch.

    LMAO - captcha = GAGGING (I bet you gag on that big black jailhouse cock, lmao!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on pusscake - keep threatening me with those IMAGINARY lawsuits a penniless LOSER JAILBIRD like you can't backup bitch... apk

  54. Elvis JAILHOUSE ROCK = Khyber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can hear Khyber SQUEALIN' THRU THE WHOLE CELLBLOCK - Leroy's JAMMIN' HIM FULL OF COCK!"

    Khyber = EVERY large black man's GIRLFRIEND in the showers, RoTfLmAo!

    * Elvis' tune "JAILHOUSE ROCK" plays in accompaniment as the cot springs SQUEAK (& so do YOU w/ each penentrating 'thrust', hahahahaha!)

    Hahahahaha.... Oh, those PAINFUL 'memories' (that you miss, lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You KNOW it's true. You LONG to return to the cell where you're the BIG BLACK MEN's special lil' "teddy bear", lmao... apk

  55. Khyber how's the hemmorhoids buttboy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFLMAO Khyber got 'breached' & abused https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10788413&cid=54697067/ https://openpasts.com/PublicRecord/ALEX-MCQUOWN/1578057922825639/ (hahahaha watch his 'butthurt' reply, pun intended) The infamous 'they' say "THE BUTLER DID IT" when it was REALLY Khyber the expert on breaches (anal ones)

  56. YakYak by szy · · Score: 1

    YakYak is an unofficial, open source Hangouts client that works almost as good as GTalk client did. On top of that it works on Linux / Mac & Windows. You can find it here. Licensed under MIT license.

    I used to like GTalk client a lot and used it to its last day. The switch to Hangouts was painful, both the Chrome App and Extension were terrible. I almost switched to the FB alternative, but I found YakYak and I'm pretty happy with it.

    Reading what I just wrote I cannot believe that I'm not their rep ;-)

  57. One Size Does Not Fit All by Mybrid · · Score: 1

    Hi! Chat is a large enough space with a diverse enough set of requirements that one size does not fit all.

    Discord works great for games.

    Zoom focuses on business conferences.

    Skype has cheap long distant rates for internet to non-Internet phones.

    WhatApp is great for international users.

    There is another international chat app I used which had great call back, call forwarding, and automatic response features because of being in different time zones.

    People who live on Facebook use that chat.

    I use Google hangouts for a couple of people who use gmail a lot. You'll be emailing back and forth and then just move to hangouts.

    I use at least 5 different chat apps depending on the context and this is just fine. Google hangouts to me is the stripped down chat when it comes to features and limited when it comes to audience. The client on Linux only has about 20 characters with and is not very "long text" friendly. You can't really dump code or other long text into it and have it be cut/copy/paste friendly.

  58. Already exists! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    You mean WASTE, which got semi-forked over to here. Pass around the news, it could definitely use being revived but I've no idea how to do it aside from let people know it exists.

    Interesting note: Its initial release in 2003 got reported here.