Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Boring Machine Completes the First Section of An LA Tunnel (theverge.com)

New submitter simkel shares a report from The Verge: Serial entrepreneur Elon Musk says his ambitious tunnel-boring endeavor, aptly named The Boring Company, has officially started digging underneath Los Angeles. Musk announced the news on Twitter, where he said "Godot," the Samuel Beckett-inspired name of the company's tunnel boring machine, had completed the the first segment of a tunnel in the Southern California metropolis. Prior to today, it was unclear how long it would take Musk to convince the city to allow him to move the experimental effort beyond the SpaceX parking lot in Hawthorne. We don't have details on what Musk hammered out with the city of LA. But he did tweet earlier this month about a meeting with L.A Mayor Eric Garcetti to lay the groundwork for the necessary permits and regulatory approvals he'd need to start digging with Godot, which weighs about 1,200 tons and runs about 400 feet long. Musk said last month that the first tunnel would run from LAX to Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood, and Sherman Oaks, with later tunnels covering more of the greater LA area. Now, it looks like the LAX to Culver City route appears underway.

139 comments

  1. Sure is boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that machine is SOOOOOOO boring!!! YAWN!!! :)

    1. Re: Sure is boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Musk is looking at connecting LA to the Mojave Spaceport by tunneling through the Angeles National Forest? This has been on drawing boards since the 1950s, and would open up the ability for SpaceX to do polar orbiting launches, instead of using Vandenberg AFB. That's his profit goal, but TBM'S have already dug the Chunnel and other projects that are currently aiming at tunneling under the Alps to better connect Italy, France, and Switzerland. What's so fresh about Musk's machine?

    2. Re: Sure is boring... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      There's nothing fresh about his machine - it was bought for purposes of understanding the current technology.

  2. Boring by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    As it used to say in the Yellow Pages: "Boring: see Civil Engineers".

  3. A boring machine! Ya hear that? by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 0

    How exciting!

  4. How long? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't say, but does anyone know how long this "first segment" is? Since the TBM itself is 400 feet long, I can only assume it's at least 400 feet...

    1. Re:How long? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I don't know, but I'm not waiting for it.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:How long? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Informative

      A segment refers to the concrete liner rings. So actually, using Seattle's project with the world's largest boring machine as an upper limit seems more like a couple orders of magnitude less. The tunnel is lined with 2-ft thick by 6.5ft long concrete panels or segments.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:How long? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      So they cut a lousy six and a half feet? Call me when they connect two cities!

    4. Re:How long? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Godot?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:How long? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they cut a lousy six and a half feet? Call me when they connect two cities!

      I'm selling shares in a venture to connect the cities of Champaign and Urbana if you're interested.

    6. Re:How long? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Look up Waiting for Godot.

      But save yourself 2 hours of your life and don't watch it. Put it to better use and do something with more fun and excitement - like deleting duplicate files from your harddrives.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    7. Re: How long? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Well, I read the book. There's a movie?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    8. Re: How long? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It's a play. I don't know if they made a movie.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    9. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a coincidence! I'm looking for investors for my Kansas City, MO to Kansas City, KS project!

  5. How long has this been secretly planned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just don't announce a tunnel boring company and then show up with a huge/complex/costly machine and start tunneling under a city that happens to be handy.

    How long has all this been secretly in the works?

    1. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Old economy square daddies don't. Hip unicorns with agile apps totally do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He already used all the tunneling equipment to build his secret underground super-villain lair. This is just re-purposing it for profit.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

      I think there might be the underground superhero/villain, and hopefully a profitable project, but I think it's practice for Mars. The Martian ground offers conveniently available radiation shielding.

    4. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      IIRC the machine was built for a tunnel somewhere else and he bought it, but wikipedia does not have it and I am not digging deeper.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    5. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he has a whole fleet of these machines and plans to create tunnels going all the way to China. After all Europe have a railway that goes from Beijing to London.

    6. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

      IIRC the machine was built for a tunnel somewhere else and he bought it, but wikipedia does not have it and I am not digging deeper.

      If only you had some sort of machine to help you dig deeper.

    7. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Adam West is the greatest underground superhero.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    8. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also offers conveniently impossible to work material, absent Earth's micro-organisms, worms, water, and wind.

    9. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by The123king · · Score: 1

      Too Soon.

      But still funny.

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    10. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I think there might be the underground superhero/villain, and hopefully a profitable project, but I think it's practice for Mars."

      Hummm... He'll need to practice a lot, then. It's a lot of digging to Mars.

    11. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be boring.

    12. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Christopher Reeve might beg to differ.

    13. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      "Somewhere else" was conveniently close, in LA - but I don't remember the project.

    14. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I think it's practice for Mars. The Martian ground offers conveniently available radiation shielding.

      How's it going to help testing the equipment on Earth? On Mars it'll be operating in about 0.3776 of Earth gravity, less than 1% of the atmospheric pressure, and around 100(K/C) lower temperatures. That's going to affect everything from sparking in electrical motors, to viscosity of hydraulics, to bending of structural members under the weight. So you're going to have to re--design it considerably once you get experience on Mars itself.

      I don't believe it's going to happen, or be needed, but we're already certain that there are appreciable natural lava-tube caves on Mars, which would give you the radiation and micrometeoroid protection for essentially free. That'll be enough for a Mars-based science mission. Terraforming isn't going to happen - because living in space will be easier than terraforming by many orders of magnitude.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Musk's idea is original and terrific! He is proposing building a network of tunnels to move people around LA. No other cities anywhere will have such things. These subterranean roadways, or subways, will be... oh wait.

    To keep the concept fresh, he could sell sandwiches on them as well. They would be Subway Sand... nevermind.

    1. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah . And none of his businesses ever made money. If PayPal didn't buy his payment system back in the dot.bomb era, he'd be some Schlub at Starbucks askng , " do you want room for cream?"

      track record indeed. Silly Valley people are worse than the Evangelical Christians I'm surrounded by.

    2. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      SpaceX has had unprofitable periods and profitable periods. General consensus is that it's probably running around the break even point on average, but it's doing that while plumbing a large amount of R&D money into reusable rocket technologies, developing them and currently trying to drive the refurb window down to days. That may not meet your definition of "profitable", but if nothing else, it's employing a lot of people, helping local economies, advancing the state of the art in aerospace, and has directly driven launch costs down while causing competitors to find ways to make access to space cheaper too. That's already a win, even if they go bust tomorrow, which is unlikely.

      There's a similar situation for Tesla, plumbing a huge amount of money into a battery factory and generally investing for the long haul, not for immediate profit.

      Unlike many businessmen, Musk is not in it for the money. He's in it to change the world in ways he believe are for the better. Will it all work out? Probably some will, some won't (I'm not sold on the viability of the Boring idea), and there are problems with his approaches (e.g, running employees to the bone) but it's still a damn sight more impressive than "schlub at Starbucks". He's done more for the world than you will do if you had a hundred lifetimes to do it in.

    3. Re: Unique concept! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      profitable would be something that has recouped the investment put into it. ...you know why it matters to speak about it so? you know how fucking annoying it's to see arguments that "his" idea of x or y is a good idea because he is such a genius inventor businessman.

      he has made that public image on purpose so that he can get even more money for even more things that may or may not make a profit some day.

      "profitable periods" is not the thing on the table, it's just just the plain profit. anyone can make a company have a profitable period, but it's a lot harder to have a self sustaining company.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understand that they could easily be profitable right now if they weren't re-investing that money into better technology and R&D, right? And the reason they are driving costs lower so quickly is exactly because of that R&D?

      And that SpaceX is privately owned and can do whatever the hell it thinks is best in the long run, rather than the kind of short term, next-quarter-or-bust thinking you are espousing?

    5. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what has he done that is so good for the rest of the 6billion+ folk on the planet,others are involved in cheapening space launches,teslas battery megaplant could become a giant white elephant if one of the many "new" battery types takes off big time.
      Many other places have had tunnels for over a century.
      About the most useful for others so far has been PayPal.

    6. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, but he can't really cut R&D.
      Once you cut R&D your business is running on a fixed time.
      It's like a factory stopping to buy raw materials. Sure, you get a lot of profit from whatever you had in the pipeline, but once you run out you are done for.

      So really, it's not realistic to say that you can become profitable from cutting R&D just like that.
      It would be like saying that you are profitable because you have new investors coming in, or just got a large bank loan.

    7. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't understand his business model at all.

      he could cut R&D right now and probably be the most profitable aerospace company there ever was, he's at least a decade away from any other competitor (except maybe Blue Origin), he could cut all R&D, reduce employee count, raise his launch up to about 10% under competitor prices. sit on this for years and make billions of dollars. its really that simple.

      but that's not his plan, as was said previously, Musk has a vision, and that's what drives him, he wants to make the world a better place (his vision of that) and that's what he's doing. the guy could definitely make ALOT more money if he wanted.

    8. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's at least a decade away from any other competitor (except maybe Blue Origin)

      That doesn't seem right. Public info is kind of scarce, but it's pretty clear SpaceX didn't begin building a test bed for controlled, powered landing of a booster until 2011-2012. ULA isn't very agile, but with real support from management, it's hard to believe they couldn't catch up very quickly given the experienced engineering talent that they have. The reasons they haven't are purely dinosaur business model, not technical.

  7. Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He does in less 1/20 the time that it would take the government in the best of circumstances.

    Public hearings. Zoning whackos. Tree huggers. LGBTQ. Climate Alarmists. All the usual freaks, fruits, and nuts would have lawyered up and entangled this project for decades if it had been government sponsored.

    Bravo, Elon! Bravo!

    1. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But he hasn't left his own property yet has he? There isn't a lot of red tape to work though to dig a hole on your own property, some, but not a lot.

      It's a tunnel that goes nowhere at this point. Wait, he's going to be tied up in red tape soon enough doing traffic studies, environmental impact statements, building permits and OSHA reports.... Not to mention doing some actual engineering and survey work...

      However, I wouldn't be surprised if getting caught up in the red tape isn't the plan. I know of a couple of deep holes being dug in some pretty interesting locations under strange circumstances, including this one. I'm beginning to suspect some kind of Glomar Explorer esk project is going on....This hole in the ground sure looks like a cover story worthy of Howard Huges, dubious in actual value, but plausible enough you cannot just dismiss it out of hand.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Totally awesome - really by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the extend of Musk's boring machine but the ones they use to dig tunnels through mountains also reinforce the walls at the same time. So from a traffic and environmental standpoint.. not sure there's much to study.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOL, This IS LA you know... Right smack dab in the middle of some pretty nasty earthquake prone fault lines... It's going to obviously produce a LOT of tailings that will have to be put someplace and likely have to be below the water table meaning it will have waste water being pumped out of it....AND this is California we are discussing... There will be scads of environmental impact studies required for this...

      Then there are all the permits he's going to need from all the various cities, county, state and federal interests for just the traffic impacts of his "private" transportation system.... And Building permits..... Engineering studies..... Inspections.... Mining permits... Safety plans... Dang the list goes on and on..

      This is just a cover story....He's never going to build the tunnel... At least not one that goes anywhere related to getting to the airport on time.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re: Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Environmental law is a lot confusing, so let me clear this up:

      Per California law Environmental Impact Reports under CEQA are only required if a public agency is in charge of the project, aka state or local tax money is being used.
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Environmental_Quality_Act#Environmental_Impact_Report_.28EIR.29

      It's a similar story at the Federal level, NEPA only requires Federal agencies to complete assessments if a Federal agency is involved, or if Federal tax money is being used.

      Because this endeavor is entirely privately funded, Elon stays clears of the murkiest of environmental laws. He will probably will still have to pull some kind of building permit, but theoretically if he buys rights to the underground along the path it is his property and he doesn't need broad public approval, or even the approval of the people living above. Property owners don't own what's underneath the ground of their property unless it was specifically included in the deed.

    5. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no red tape on mars. He has mentioned that the boring machine is going to drill smaller holes than what is typically done. I wouldn't be surprised if it could fit on the front of a falcon heavy with a couple solar roofs and batteries as well.

    6. Re:Totally awesome - really by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are putting in a tunnel in my city for an LRT system. For many years before they were drilling core samples to know what they were going to be drilling through. Even then we've had 3 sinkholes caused by the tunnelling and it's only been luck that nobody has been hurt.

      One does not just decide to make a tunnel through a downtown core without years of preparation and approval. Tunnelling causes a lot of the ground to shift which can cause damage to buildings and the sinkholes. While Musk can afford to pay for the damages the city can't if it's found out that due diligence wasn't done and they permitted this to go ahead.

    7. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is just a cover story..."

      One word.

      Nucular waist.

    8. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His property is in Hawthorne not Los Angeles and Hawthorne has not issued any permits for this activity. Also, any tunneling under public streets in Los Angeles needs city council approval and I have not seen meeting minutes related to the tunnel. My guess is this is another one of the tall tales out of Musk. I am still waiting for Tesla profitability which Musk has promised every quarter for the last 5 years.

    9. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Right smack dab in the middle of some pretty nasty earthquake prone fault lines...

      *cough*

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salesforce_Tower

      *cough*

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Subway

      *cough*

      Shit, Tokyo is in greater earthquake danger than LA, and it's fucking RIDDLED with subways and ENCRUSTED with skyscrapers. It blows my mind that people like you act as if we don't fucking know how to construct with earthquakes in mind.

      Jesus Christ.

    10. Re: Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah,it's just the rich digging deep holes for themselves to try and survive the big impacter that is due to hit in the next 35 years,the one that nobody is telling the public about to avoid total panic and mayhem,it explains why so many governments and individuals are acting as if there is no need to worry about long term problems like over population,climate change,bankrupt and collapsing economies etc etc,because they know it's a waste of time cos the shots going to hit the fan soon in the shape of a 13 mile wide mixed type impacted !!
      Prove me wrong !!

    11. Re:Totally awesome - really by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      They are putting in a tunnel in my city for an LRT system. ... Tunnelling causes a lot of the ground to shift which can cause damage to buildings and the sinkholes.

      They are not doing it the right way then. Modern tunneling generally lines the bore continuously as the earth is cut. There should be no external effect whatsoever; that is how London's Crossrail is being built. But I wouldn't like to say about the ground in an area with moving faults, like California.

      Having said that, Musk's scheme is nonsense. As cars are to be brought down to the tunnels with lifts, the throughput will be very low indeed, OK for just a few billionaires maybe. Has Musk never had to wait for a lift?

    12. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As cars are to be brought down to the tunnels with lifts, the throughput will be very low indeed, OK for just a few billionaires maybe. Has Musk never had to wait for a lift?

      Have you ever been to an airport? They have this wondrous system, where they have the runway, which a plane has to use for about three minutes, and the gate, which a plane has to use for upwards an hour. The runway is the tunnel, the lifts are the gates...

    13. Re:Totally awesome - really by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Yet somehow Japan has managed to have very effective subway systems all over the country while being far more seismically active.

      You're correct in that he just can't start boring tunnels wherever he pleases. However if you do it correctly, the tunnel is going to be extremely strong and stable.

      I'd have to go back and search but wasn't the original plan simply to build a tunnel connecting a couple parking lots so his employees could park their cars and have a relatively easy walk to get inside the building?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    14. Re:Totally awesome - really by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You still have to do them. Laws don't bend to logic.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    15. Re:Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather compare the tunnels to the sky and the lifts to the runways...

    16. Re:Totally awesome - really by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The tailings, the boring machine, and the tunnel it digs probably cause cancer also.

    17. Re:Totally awesome - really by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      They are lining the tunnel as they proceed but we're still getting sinkholes including one that turned into a popular meme (at least around here). Of course the mayor says it's just part of the work which makes me dislike him as a mayor even more. (I have no opinion as a person because I don't know him.)

      But they've been working on phase 1 for a few years now and it won't be open for almost another year and they are already lining up phase 2 work to start right away. We have no idea how well it's going to work but let's spend another $3B on LRT for the hell of it. The company running it might be a disaster or people just might not take the LRT and turn to their car but let's double down. It's only taxpayer money after all.

  8. Purely selfish intentions by planckscale · · Score: 1

    I wonder what these tunnels will do? Perhaps he's just tired of sitting in traffic in LA like everyone else - in his 100k Tesla - with fanboys gawking at him and he is tired of the lookie-loos? He's more important than everyone else so, hey he's a billionaire, why not just build a tunnel so he doesn't have to share the road with other common folk? 10 to 1 these tunnels will have gates on each end with a pass-code available to only a handful of 1%'ers.

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Purely selfish intentions by CFD339 · · Score: 1

      One supposes he plans to do something with his hyperloop idea.

      --
      The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's good to be king!"

    3. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this was purely motivated by serving his butt from home to office I'm pretty sure a helicopter would be more economical than boring tunnels up and down Californian metros.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    4. Re:Purely selfish intentions by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's a "new form of transportation" where cars will be transported to their destination on automatic self-powered carts.

      So, kinda sorta relieves congestion but with parking issues at the destination, and still requiring people who want freedom of movement to buy a f---ing car. I'm hoping someone will look at the UK "tube" tunnels under London and realize that you can actually get a lot of train in a constrained space, and use it for that instead.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Purely selfish intentions by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Look up Glomar Explorer.... Mining the ocean floor? Yea that was plausible, but couldn't work financially.

      I'm just guessing, but this tunnel to the airport from SpaceX sure looks like a cover story to me. Kind of plausible, but financially ridiculous, even for Musk, who could afford a helicopter ride to his private jet any time he was running late.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But without any air-conditioning. That should be a prize challenge - figure out how to add air-conditioning to 1960's era Underground carriages given the constraints of less than 6 inches clearance at the side or on the roof of each carriage.

    7. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Building an expansive, expensive tunnel system to support subway cars that carry 5 people a piece. Sounds smart.

    8. Re:Purely selfish intentions by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system. If you want to go 20 miles without a car and have 2 or 3 hours to spare, that combined network is reasonable.

      Musk's system looks likes it provides an alternative to the heavily congested I-495. I'd assume that once a car goes from, say, Culver City to Sherman Oaks, it's going to go further on surface streets to other destinations rather than a parking lot near the terminal. L.A. is very spread out and most places have just-barely-adequate parking, but new parking issues aren't likely to happen.

      Expect this to be an expensive ride with demand pricing approaching $20 during morning and evening rush periods.

      This is not a trivial task. Going to Sherman Oaks means going through the Sepulveda Pass, 1100 feet above LAX. Electric propulsion is going to add a significant burden to LA's already marginal power grid.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read an article about China attempting to mine the ocean floor, maybe that is a cover story as well?

    10. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I don't recall Musk ever taking a vow of public service. If his intentions are purely selfish, then so be it. He doesn't owe you jack.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up induced demand if you want to see why this will not work. The best way to reduce congestion is to get people out of their cars and have them get rid of their cars for other forms of transportation.

    12. Re:Purely selfish intentions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      IIRC there is or was a general prize challenge.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Purely selfish intentions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system. If you want to go 20 miles without a car and have 2 or 3 hours to spare, that combined network is reasonable.

      That's not really "fairly well". A well-working mass transit system in a metro area beats cars substantially for many journeys. I don't know anyone in my office who drives in.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Purely selfish intentions by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Or he could use one of those flight-proven Falcon 9 boosters he has lying around! Just put a seat with controls on the top. Traveling in style.

    15. Re:Purely selfish intentions by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system

      Hey, I saw that documentary. What a disaster! I don't know how people in LA survive.

    16. Re:Purely selfish intentions by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Haul an extra 1-2 carriages at the back of the train holding water (at the start of a journey) at near 0 degrees or even ice (energy for phase change - solid to liquid - is huge) and use that to sink the heat from the carriages.

      At end of the line, dump the warmed up water/melted ice and refill?

    17. Re:Purely selfish intentions by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I wonder what these tunnels will do?

      My guess is that they will provide habitation and transportation for his Mars bases.

    18. Re:Purely selfish intentions by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was a bit weird to complain about sitting in traffic from SpaceX to LAX - even in horrible traffic it's only like 20 minutes - the two are barely 6 miles apart as the road goes. And if he was to dig some kind of tunnel, he'd have to go right under the stack interchange between the 405 and the 105, as well as a Metro line - I'd have to think that CalTrans might take issue with someone digging underneath the piers of a busy interchange like that...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up "personal preference" for figuring out why your central planning and compelling people that aren't you to do things they don't want to won't work.

      I've never bought into the 'induced demand' argument - the demand is already there - people largely don't drive places just to look at a new road. They're already making that trip, they are just making it in a way that is far less efficient than the new / altered route. Building new infrastructure gets those vehicles off the neighborhood streets and onto the highways and arterials where they should be.

    20. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's on a private jet, why wouldn't he land at Hawthorne Municipal? It's got a 5,000 foot runway (good enough for most modern private jets at close to sea level if not fully weighed down) and it's literally next door to SpaceX.

    21. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could create a new company to create giant hovercrafts that ferry entire cars around.

    22. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build yourself a small feet-powered "car" out of cardboard, lift it with your arms and run in small steps so that you embark onto the lift and then underground cart. This will work at fast food drive-ins too.

    23. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or skytran.net
      low power, high throughput, direct lines (point to point), fault tolerant, easily seismically protected, low density (thus low target for terrorism), cheaply installed, existing technology

    24. Re:Purely selfish intentions by kaybee · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5V_VzRrSBI

    25. Re:Purely selfish intentions by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Many people (and I'm one of them) are of the opinion we're at or very close to peak car ownership in most western countries.

      This is down to both congestion and self-driving technologies maturing enough that people don't have to drive and won't need to pay high rates for taxis (single highest expense == driver), therefore won't buy cars in large numbers from about 20 years time.

      Tailoffs in ownership in urban areas are already noted along with a steep decline in the numbers of younger people getting driving licenses.

      The times, they are a changing.

    26. Re:Purely selfish intentions by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      No need for extra carriages.

      London Underground is doing this by putting the water blocks under the seats and the chilling equipment under the carriages.

      The chillers run when the trains are above ground (which is a large chunk of the network) and thermal inertia is used below ground.

      This doesn't work for the "Deep Lines" which are 40-200 feet underground their entire length and other methods are being worked on for that.

    27. Re:Purely selfish intentions by torkus · · Score: 1

      This is not a trivial task. Going to Sherman Oaks means going through the Sepulveda Pass, 1100 feet above LAX. Electric propulsion is going to add a significant burden to LA's already marginal power grid.

      https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      I'm not so sure about that.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  9. Pointless explanation by quenda · · Score: 1

    where he said "Godot," the Samuel Beckett-inspired name

    Whats the chances that a reader does not get the "Godot" reference, but knows Beckett from all his other famous plays?

    For those unfamiliar, Beckett won a Nobel Prize in literature, but is better known by your average theatre-goer as the most boring playwright in history.
    (And obviously the machine arrived well behind schedule.)

    1. Re:Pointless explanation by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the play, the eponymous character "Godot" never arrives.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Pointless explanation by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the info. I didn't feel like figuring out if Samuel Beckett was even an actual person, or else just some character in a movie/book. But boring playwright is certainly a category I understand.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Pointless explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't go on.
      I'll go on.

      A bit of Beckett trivia:
      The "Sucking Stones" sequence from "Molloy" was originally a Stage piece to be done as a duet, with one aspect played by a Chaplin-like character, and the other as a Keaton. It was choreographed this way, and included a Flute played off-stage. Beckett, MacGowran, and Nollaig worked on it for quite some time before Beckett abandoned the concept and turned "Molloy" into a book, eventually the first of a trilogy.
      In 1964, MacGowran and Nollaig resurrected the duet for just one performance in NYC.

      Captcha: summing

    4. Re:Pointless explanation by Swistak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude. Spoilers!

  10. Wow.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there I am... just past 50 years old thinking the only revolution I'd see was the internet.

    And here we are... rockets, electric cars, and tunneling machines.

    I hope I make it to 90!!!

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Wow.... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes flying down the highway. Elon is just expanding his network connection.

    2. Re:Wow.... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      True.. Just don't underestimate the latency of that high bandwidth pipe...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean things that existed already in the 19th century? Wow, what a revolution. What about all the real revolutions like life extension and understanding biology?

    4. Re:Wow.... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      You mean things that existed already in the 19th century?

      Unless I'm mistaken myself, I think his irony was a bit too subtle.

  11. LA? by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    LA is not one big city. SpaceX is in Hawthorne, a totally separate city with its own city council, etc. The same can be said of Culver City, Santa Monica, and dozens of other cities that many think of as just part of "LA". Each of these presents another opportunity to get bogged down in local politics.

    1. Re:LA? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LA is not one big city. SpaceX is in Hawthorne, a totally separate city with its own city council, etc. The same can be said of Culver City, Santa Monica, and dozens of other cities that many think of as just part of "LA". Each of these presents another opportunity to get bogged down in local politics.

      Surely Musk isn't stupid.... He knows all this..

      Building a tunnel that actually goes someplace doesn't seem to be the likely plan....Digging a hole in the ground obviously is... So one is left to wonder two things... 1. Why is Musk telling us this fanciful story that is obviously NOT going to happen and 2. What does he really intend to put in that hole? AND (more to the point) 3. Who is paying him to put it there?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:LA? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      1. Why is Musk telling us this fanciful story that is obviously NOT going to happen and 2. What does he really intend to put in that hole? AND (more to the point) 3. Who is paying him to put it there?

      You forgot: 4. Has he stopped beating his wife?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  12. Obviously he's going to sell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transportation of soliciting minors who feed you, 'under' the watchful eye of the unwashed masses who can't afford food, minors, or transportation in LA :)

  13. Earthquakes? by irrational_design · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sure this isn't an issue since they must have smart engineers working on the project, but the first thing that comes to my mind are the earthquakes that plague California. Is this not an issue?

    1. Re:Earthquakes? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They're not an issue because this thing, like the Hyperloop, will never be built as described.

      You might as well worry about the effect of a goose crashing into the space elevator.

    2. Re:Earthquakes? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      So....Why is Musk spinning this yarn? What is he covering up? What goes into the hole and who is paying Musk to put it there? Hmmm....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teslas take up far more space than Atari game cartridges...

    4. Re:Earthquakes? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      L.A. already has subways; they have to be built with consideration for earthquakes. Likely they'll design for the worst quake expected over a typical 500 year period, and if there's ever a quake over magnitude 6 they'll shut it down for a day to inspect for damage.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      let me search that for you, lazy internet user.

      How is it safe to be underground when the earth starts shaking? Turns out underground structures are safe because they move with the soil, while structures above ground sway back and forth.

      Imagine a plate of fruit-filled gelatin dessert. Tunnels are like the pieces of fruit at the base of the gelatin, while above-ground structures are like the fruit toward the top. If you shake the plate, the movement becomes more exaggerated as it flows up from the base of the gelatin. In an earthquake, this translates to tunnel movement measured in inches, while the movement above ground might be measured in feet.

      http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/Status/Blog/tunnels-and-earthquakes

    6. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't very good at this thing you are trying to do.

    7. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true! I bet this guy isn't gonna get this week's paycheck!

    8. Re: Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story... I was sitting down waiting in a mine in South Africa for some VIPs to come down on a visit, when we had a 5.5 Richter scale earthquake. We heard the shock wave coming towards us through the workings then I was thrown 2ft into the air as the wave passed. Result was a bruised ass and a huge dust cloud. Even if the tunnel lining withstands the shock I wouldn't want to be travelling through any tunnel in the event of an earthquake.

    9. Re:Earthquakes? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      But, the tunnel has to connect to the surface so vehicles can enter and exit, wouldn't what you are describing just rip the tunnel away from it's surface buildings?

  14. Tunnel entry and exit will be the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be useful you need to be able to get traffic in and out. That takes a lot of space, space which in most cities is already in short supply.
    Add in the additional traffic problems from injecting thousands of cars/hour into the central city area.

    Won't that be fun.

    I suspect the not so evil plan is to restrict use to EV only, which solves MOST of the A/C problems.

    1. Re:Tunnel entry and exit will be the problem by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      L.A. is spread out, with several corridors of dense building. The "central city area" of downtown L.A. is actually pretty small, a roughly pentagonal area about 2 miles across. Musk's initial tunnel doesn't even go there.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. About average weight for a California permit by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "...which weighs about 1,200 tons and runs about 400 feet long.

  16. Wow, first I've heard of it by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This is the most exciting boring machine I've ever read about!

  17. Stonecutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who controls the British crown?
    Who keeps the metric system down?
    We do, we do
    Who keeps Atlantis off the maps?
    Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
    We do, we do
    Who builds Tesla electric cars?
    Who makes Elon Musk a star?
    We do, we do
    Who robs gamefish of their sight?
    Who rigs every Oscar night?
    We do, we do!

  18. Simpsons did it by istartedi · · Score: 1
    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  19. Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can engineer against anything. At least up to a 50 years lifespan. It's only after 50 years when the rebar is rusting that you have to worry. In other words only old structures are potentially dangerous but then that's why such things are rebuilt.

    There is nothing stronger than a tube in the ground. Far more secure during a 12.0 earthquake than any overpass. Your far more likely to die from being trampled in an earthquake than from a tunnel collapse. We are not talking about mine shafts but rather oversized concrete tubes. A tube could split in half and move 3 inches and still be perfectly fine and usable.

    The bigger issue is structures on the surface and ground stability during and after the evacuation. If they are drilling in rock or underneath rock then it should be much of an effect. But I can see Musk digging tunnels underneath other tunnels.

    1. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Your far more likely to die from being trampled in an earthquake than from a tunnel collapse. We are not talking about mine shafts but rather oversized concrete tubes. A tube could split in half and move 3 inches and still be perfectly fine and usable.

      I wonder how much the above remains true if you are moving through the tunnel at 125 MPH at the time of the quake?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can engineer things for longer than 50 years. See (modern) nuclear plants as an example. They tend to be built for an operational life of 50 years and a care & maintenance and decommissioning period of 100 years. It's expensive, requires overengineering, may involve use of stainless rebar (but that has its own problems as stainless is prone to neutron activation) etc. But it can definitely be done. There are plenty of Roman concrete buildings still standing.

    3. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by pz · · Score: 1

      You can use stainless rebar for lifespans over 50 years. Increases costs, yes, but it is possible.

      http://stainlessrebar.com/

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A more recent example of civil-engineering marvels is the Empire State Building, which was massively overengineered.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    5. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Buddapest Metro was built in 1896 and the London Underground was built in 1890.

      Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_metro_systems

      "rebuild in 50 years" is how we got the Y2K bug.

    6. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More of it than if you are moving at 60 MPH (or 10 MPH, this is LA) on an overpass?

  20. The real meaning of his tweets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look folks--what Elon's really trying to say:

    "I'm a lot like Trump"

    "I have A LOT of money"

    "I'm SMART"

    "I have an A-type personality"

    "I haven't been in long term relationships, but have kids"

    "I'm a businessman"

    Of course, Elon has different social attitudes and handles himself differently... Likely more acceptable and admired by more than the other guy.

    But Boring Co just shows he's wants something and he's going to do everything in his power to get it. Money is power and access... plain and simple.

    Sure the ends could be beneficial to the rest of us, but the means are pretty clear: "I have a big ego, I want power, look at me!".

    And as folks voted for a president I disagree with despite these aspects, I instead agree with Elon--more power to him, but no different from those who voted that other person into office.

    And life goes on...

    As for me, I'm just another squirrel trying to get a nut around here.

  21. Seismic faults beneath LA by Mosquito+Bites · · Score: 2

    While this 'boring' news seems a little bit exciting, one must not forget that there are lots of seismic faults beneath LA, and many of them are unstable

    1. Re:Seismic faults beneath LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me wonder how much steel you would need to bind LA together enough to move to problem out of the city, or if that is even possible.
      I'm thinking that if the entire city was built on a steel slab a mile deep then it shouldn't be an issue, but I'm also pretty sure that you can do with way less than that.

    2. Re:Seismic faults beneath LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did they name the machine after JoAnn Worley?

  22. Or perhaps a reference to Buck Godot. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps it's a reference to the (massive, extremely strong, near invulnerable, hyper competent, hyper confident, and utterly laid-back) science fiction graphic novel character Buck Godot.

    (Who, himself, is a reference to "Waiting For Godot", but a step removed.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  23. StarTram Redux? by mentil · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Musk is planning on combining boring, hyperloop, and SpaceX tech to create a maglev space launch system like StarTram.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  24. Haters gonna hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when a giant space rock comes crashing down and making surface life impossible to sustain, everyone will be quite content to accept the boring company's results.

  25. When it collapses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when it collapses, like all subterranean things eventually do, who picks up the tab for the sinkholes, shifted-foundation buildings, and associated bedlam back up on the poor ol' surface?

  26. Found Godot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I waiting and waiting for that basturd a long time. Send him to me, time to end this world of pain.

  27. Was expecting something more revolutionary by sciengin · · Score: 1

    Than just a plain old TBM.
    Yeah ok, so he is drilling tunnels with it, but I dont see any differences to any other run of the mill TBM out there.
    Elon being Elon, I would have expected at least a plasma drill or maybe even better, a subterrene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Was expecting something more revolutionary by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Than just a plain old TBM.
      Yeah ok, so he is drilling tunnels with it, but I dont see any differences to any other run of the mill TBM out there.
      Elon being Elon, I would have expected at least a plasma drill or maybe even better, a subterrene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      One of his goals was to find ways to speed up tunneling, by as much as 10X IIRC.
      At this point, there's no indication if their Boring is any quicker.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Was expecting something more revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      engineers bore slowly not cos they want to, but because there's a limit. You can bore at 10x, hit a pipe, hit an unknown aquifer etc and the tunnel will get flooded before it can be controlled.

      you can drive your car at 150mph if you'd like, but the time you have to react to any minor incident decreases rapidly.

  28. Interesting by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I didn't pay much attention to this until I noticed an article explaining the thinking behind it. Basically, the idea is to substantially reduce the cost of a tunnel system, and they are going to try to do that through a combination of:
    - smaller tunnels, which will require only 1/4 of the dirt removal of standard vehicle tunnels
    - automated, continuous tunnel lining, to reduce downtime for the boring machine
    - speeding up both boring and lining
    The small tunnel size is what necessitates the cars-on-sleds idea. Can they load cars on sleds quickly and cheaply? Who knows.

  29. Betting Pool Anyone? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Should we start a betting pool on which they hit first? Lava? Oil? A delicate fault line? American Indian remains?

    1. Re:Betting Pool Anyone? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Put me down for $50 on them waking a Balrog.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson