Slashdot Mirror


System76 Unveils Its Own Ubuntu-Based Linux Distribution Called 'Pop!_OS' (betanews.com)

BrianFagioli writes: Not content with simply following Canonical and embracing vanilla GNOME, System76 has decided to take its future into its own hands. Today, the company releases the first alpha of an all-new Linux-based operating system called "Pop!_OS," which will eventually be the only OS pre-loaded on its computers. While it will still be based on Ubuntu and GNOME, System76 is tweaking it with its own style and included drivers. In other words, the company is better controlling the user experience, and that is smart.

"The Pop!_OS community is in its infancy. This is a fantastic time to engage with and help develop the processes and practices that will govern the future development of the operating system and its community. The team is currently opening up planning for the development roadmap, code of conduct, discussion forums, and the processes surrounding code contribution. Progress made on Pop!_OS has established an inviting, modern, and minimalist look and has improved the first-use experience including streamlining installation and user setup. Work on the first release, scheduled for October 19th, centers on appearance, stability, and overall tightness of the user experience followed by adding new features and greater customization ability," says System76.
You can check out the project on GitHub here and download the alpha ISO here. For more information, the company has set up a subreddi.

117 comments

  1. And so the irritation begins by TimothyHollins · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well done.
    Just like the overly enthusiastic parents that name their child "Jonn", or "Sarra", or "Madilene", you have now ensured that you will have to spell out the damn name every time you talk about it. And that "exclamation mark underscore" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.

    1. Re: And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think their hoping you call it pop "bang"

    2. Re:And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have now ensured that you will have to spell out the damn name every time you talk about it.

      With that name, my first impression was that it was marketed towards those with pimples.

    3. Re:And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not going to be a problem. Only a few people even know that System76 exists, and controversy == free advertising. They'll rename the project before anyone starts using it.

    4. Re: And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Pop-bang-underscore-oh-ess". You're right, it just rolls off the tongue.

    5. Re: And so the irritation begins by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually there has been a horrible mistake: this wasn't the name, but the developer site password.

    6. Re: And so the irritation begins by Pseudonym · · Score: 2
      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    7. Re: And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking this song

    8. Re: And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York, London, Munich, Paris
      Everybody loves Pop!_OS

      CAPTCHA: groaners

    9. Re:And so the irritation begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'll be damned if it isn't Little Timothy Hollins on one of his cutesy little 99%er websites. What a complete and utter lack of surprise to see you here, bemoaning the enthusiasm of your caste superiors.

      Yours in formality only--would that it were possible by my most cordial of convictions to discard even that dignity,
      Sir Tamathé Hoelleins the III, Esq.

  2. whoopie by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >"While it will still be based on Ubuntu and GNOME, "

    Blech. So it is just Ubuntu with a few tweaks. Yawn. Nothing to see here, keep moving. Still, I wish System76 well- I like what they do!

    1. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... I'd rather it be vanilla Ubuntu with just barely enough System76 tweaks to make it run perfectly on their hardware.

      Why would you want a highly divergent fork away from mainstream development?

    2. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it has been at least a month since Yet-Another-Linux-Based-Operating-System, WhateverOS, was announced.

      How much shit has to get flung at the wall before something sticks?! You would think the desktop Linux community would have accidentally created something successful by now. This isn't to say there are no good distros but for all the pontificating about the innovation and freedom of ideas and expression that FOSS is supposed to offer there hasnt been anything in the past 2 decades for users to say "Wow that is really awesome, I need that!", no it is just shit like Gnome3, Unity and systemd, NIH projects like Mir and Wayland as well as chasing proprietary drivers with open source ones.

      It's just a lot of flailing about rather than doing things to make personal computing better.

    3. Re:whoopie by exomondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is wasted effort!

      Carl Richell, CEO, System76 explains, "While our operating system and computers are great for any user, the ideas and features we develop for Pop!_OS will be squarely focused on the professionals and makers that use their computers to create."

      ^^ In that case invest in building applications for those users, they couldn't give 2 craps about the OS, they'd run BeOS if it ran the applications they use to do their work. As far as most of them are concerned the OS is just the bit that launches the programs they actually spend their time using. There's got to be over 100 Linux-based operating systems by now, we don't need any more because nobody cares about that. To increase the popularity of Linux and have it benefit from economies of scale what is needed is innovative programs that users want/need that work better on Linux than anything else.

    4. Re:whoopie by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I agree. Why can't they just take SteamOS, and make their computers gaming platforms? Load it up w/ something like LX/QT or Razor/qt or something.

    5. Re:whoopie by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Why would you want a highly divergent fork away from mainstream development?

      to attract some investor money. why the fuck do you think ubuntu did the exact same thing?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. +100 informative.

      As long as an OS boots, offers a reliable file system, usable GUI, network connectivity and drivers I don't care what it is.

      If it then gets out of the way, lets me turn off *all* the stuff I don't want/need and lets me run some useful programs that does the stuff I want to do I could not care a fig if it's Windows, Linux, *BSD, OSX, GEM, Haike, BeOS, ReactOS, GEM, TOS or whatever.

      The Linux crowd are going to spend unti the heat death of the universe endlessly reinventing things without ever once producing a top notch user land application.

      Kudos to them if that's what they want to do but I want to get work done. Not see endless new styles of UI etc. etc. Linux GUIs were acceptably usable 20 years ago. Linux applications are stil as crap/missing today as they were 20 years ago.

    7. Re:whoopie by WallyL · · Score: 1

      I have indeed slowed down my distro hopping. I just run applications nowadays. I prefer dnf but can get by with apt-get. I am about to try TrueOS just to try Lumina, however.

    8. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah well fat chance to get a unproven OS on my work machine , actually fat chance at putting anything else then debian on my office workstation (i'll do an exeption for BSD) , any tentative to have me work min 8h a day from an untested OS will get you my resignation

    9. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There's got to be over 100 Linux-based operating systems by now, we don't need any more because nobody cares about that.
          You are correct, most users do not care the Linux flavor, considering we're just trying to run "the applications they use to do their work".

          But a company cares a LOT because they get to brand & control the environment, which we call our environment but they consider their environment. Doing so is "their work".

      *kind of like why even a shirt may have a logo on it. We just want something to wear but the company, like a dog focusing on a fire-hydrant, pees all over us to perpetuate their presence. We just wear the stuff because weather or fashion.

    10. Re:whoopie by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Sigh. The reason they are probably "creating" an OS is to control the user experience and leveraging it from Ubuntu which is right now the most popular distro by far. The OS could then be crafted to be optimized to have drivers that work with the hardware on their systems. The whole thing is to make sure that supportability is scalable by being a gatekeeper. When you're going out on a limb and giving a product with an OS that is not mainstream, you need to curate it properly otherwise people won't buy your product.

    11. Re:whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they need to control the user experience? That is beyond making sure it works correctly.

      Ideally they should be using hardware that is supported upstream, so no modifications are needed, Where that isn't possible, they can supply custom packages that add the drivers, or whatever else is needed to make Ubuntu run smoothly on their hardware. This can be done simply with a custom repository added to Ubuntu, supplying a few modified packages. There is no need to spin it off as another whole distro.

  3. Just another remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting so sick of linux distributions that call themselves "something something operating system" when they're really YET ANOTHER repackaging on top of a repackaging on top of a repackaging of an utterly boring thing. All that changes is the branding. There's really nothing new brought to the table. All that is added is another option, quite entirely indistinguishable from all the other options, confusing the newbies.

    1. Re: Just another remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, the company has set up a subreddi. Whatever that means.

    2. Re:Just another remix by exomondo · · Score: 2

      Do they really have to follow the crap things that we get phone manufacturers doing with Android? Adding their own "style" to it?! As for drivers, contribute those to Ubuntu so that everybody benefits from that work rather than just those using a downstream fork.

      Ultimately this is just going to be "whatever RedHat decides" + "whatever Ubuntu decides" + "yet another not invented here syndrome UI styling" anyway.

      And Pop!_OS? Really? I never thought I'd see the day that Microsoft's branding style would be a better option than anything, I think I would actually prefer System76 Operating System for System76 Systems 2017.

    3. Re:Just another remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, how do I know if I need the pro version of System76 Operating System for System76 Systems 2017 or the Unexpurgated System76 Operating System for System76 Systems 2017 IoT embedded w/ SQL and data+?

    4. Re: Just another remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is like a part of reddi where sjws and nazis can argue

      so like the rest of that site

    5. Re:Just another remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do they really have to follow the crap things that we get phone manufacturers doing with Android? Adding their own "style" to it?! As for drivers, contribute those to Ubuntu so that everybody benefits from that work rather than just those using a downstream fork.

      Yes. We're seeing a replay of the dotcom era. A lax regulatory environment is leaving venture capitalists *thrilled* to fund startups, drawing their own salaries from investor's money, to fund business plans drawn up on napkins at lunch by people who've never

      Places to invest in the short term? Aeron chairs, and craft breweries. Places to invest in the long term? Dumpsters and professional hatchet men to fire everyone when the companies get sold for pennies on the dollar.

    6. Re:Just another remix by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Quite agree. They should have called it Popi-Linux or some Linux, to make it obvious to the customer that it's Linux. Or if they did a FreeBSD based thing, they could have called it Popi Unix or Popi BSD.

      Like I suggested, they should have improved on SteamOS, which is itself an Ubuntu distro

  4. Ob. systemd thread by psergiu · · Score: 0

    Hope their installer has a option for choosing the init software suite. ...
    Systemd vs. Launchd :)

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:Ob. systemd thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An option to delete all logs would be sufficient rather than full systemd

      Cuts half the bloat.

  5. Drafting Canonical is a mistake. by itomato · · Score: 1

    System76 is hindered by Ubuntu because Ubuntu is hindered by Canonical. Surely there's a better source for a fork. I get that they have lots of Ubuntu experience and a history there, but Launchpad should be EOL.

    1. Re:Drafting Canonical is a mistake. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      If they had any brains, they'd simply put ~~Debian~~ err Devuan on it.. Since Debian (and Ubuntu) have fucking up those distros with systemd, I've moved my systems to Devuan 1.0, I had high hopes when they forked Debian a couple of years ago, and now I couldn't be happier.. Debian WITHOUT systemd... Fuck you, Poettering...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:Drafting Canonical is a mistake. by hackel · · Score: 1

      My god, will you people ever shut the fuck up about systemd for one second?

  6. Re:ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    writing the logs to /dev/null

    The logs to /dev/null thing drives me nuts. Why can't systemd log messages? Problems that are obvious with the log message are often very difficult to fix since it just swallows log messages.

  7. Re:ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. We keep having problems with NTP, MySQL, and MongoDB. The errors are always trivial to fix when you run the command by hand at the command line and see the error message. Why can't systemd log that?

  8. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MongoDB almost always has problems after an unclean shutdown. The error message doesn't end up in the journal, but if you run it by hand you see a clear error message. Why can't systemd log that?

  9. why not talk about trump huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i realize this is tech website but please for sake of my livelihood i'm not gonna make my daily rubles by talking about some stupid computer thing for stinky single men, we need to talk about letter agencies, clinton crimes, something about seth rich, and how USA is not so innocent.

    1. Re:why not talk about trump huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how Slashdot feels about a (likely) homosexual man using their mouth like a toilet?

    2. Re:why not talk about trump huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stinky man make a poo in your mouth, the words you say are not much better huh, any way this is just all distraction from hillary's emails would you not say that

  10. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running NTP from systemd is just a disaster. We have several hundred servers that didn't update their time servers from DHCP. We had a lot of cert errors die to the incorrect time. systemd didn't log an error message.

  11. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if you ignore the massive scope creep, systemd is still a disaster since the logging is so bad. Logging is critical for administering machines and critical for security. We need logs.

  12. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As Linus pointed out, the systemd guys ignore bugs. As he said, they are "too cavalier about bugs." Ted Tso said "they don't consider or their responsibility to fix."

    I'd be willing to live with the problems if they would just fix their logger.

  13. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in the hell would anyone think sending logs to /dev/null would be a good thing?

  14. No Plasma? How hard could that be? by sombragris · · Score: 2

    The stubborness upon which Ubuntu and now System76 insist on choosing the clearly inferior choice (GNOME) when there's a much better option (KDE's Plasma), is impressive.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
    1. Re:No Plasma? How hard could that be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >kde
      >superior
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      even no gui is better than that bloatware...

  15. Philosophical differences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In other words, the company is better controlling the user experience, and that is smart. "

    There's something on-the-nose about this comment, and I started typing to call it out... but I don't actually disagree. It's a good philosophy for users who want someone else to do that fiddly work for them so they can do whatever it is they actually give a shit about doing, without having to first worry about the OS.

    It is a philosophical difference from many of the people who use Linux currently, who will control their own damn user experience, thank you very much! But I think that's the point - those people are already using Linux and can customise this to suit themselves if they wish to.

  16. Re:ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    systemd is a great improvement in so many ways. We replaced about a ~20k shell script with a less than 20 line unit file, and it's more reliable because of the nice "Restart=always" setting. I just wish it wouldn't drop log messages. That makes troubleshooting problems nearly impossible sometimes.

  17. System who ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck are System76 ?

    And why do we need another freaking Ubuntu "flavor" ?

    1. Re:System who ? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      System76 was Ubuntu before it was believed killed in the incident at Linux's Switzerland headquarters.

    2. Re:System who ? by youngone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who the fuck are System76 ?

      If you don't know, you should go back to Reddit.

    3. Re:System who ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody knows what System76 is, honestly. I remember Interstate 76 though. Great game!

  18. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lennart just doesn't have enough experience to understand why logs are important.

  19. Modern vs. Retro by Zobeid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...Pop!_OS has established an inviting, modern, and minimalist look..."

    Ugly flat interface. Probably with all the drop-down menus removed in favor of dumbed-down controls hidden behind cryptic icons. My experience with "modern" desktops has been uniformly negative. I mean, Windows, Mac, Gnome Shell, Unity...

    Am I the only one who thinks the desktop environment and user interface was pretty well figured out and perfected by, say, ten years ago? Since then it's just been change for the sake of change (under the holy banner of "innovation") and misguided efforts to make desktop computers work like phones. The only present-day desktop that I find attractive and comfortable to use has been Ubuntu MATE, and their motto is "for a retrospective future".

    1. Re: Modern vs. Retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought that until i switched to dwm on debian desks/amethyst on mac

    2. Re:Modern vs. Retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnome 2 was an amazing fit and MATE is doing an amazing job of keeping that whole "user experience" alive and kicking. When I heard Ubuntu was dropping Unity I was really hoping they'd adopt MATE.

      Gnome 3 is Red Hat as far as I'm concerned. If I wanted Red Hat, I'd install Red Hat.

    3. Re:Modern vs. Retro by somenickname · · Score: 2

      You might want to have a look at XFCE too. It has a proper, "Yeah, we solved this UI thing 10 years ago" interface. And, because it's been solved for so long, almost every knob and dial you'd want to fiddle with is exposed and thoroughly supported. It has quirks, to be sure, but, if you take a weekend to configure something like Debian+XFCE, you're unlikely to ever look back. That combo feels like a proper workstation and not some UI developers playground.

    4. Re:Modern vs. Retro by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      You're simply getting old.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    5. Re:Modern vs. Retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm perhaps getting fed up with Mate and Xfce though, they're the better ones for sure - and maybe KDE, but the latter one is so big and made for "KDE people" I don't bother. Like, KDE 5 feels like your screen is 800x600 because it's so oversized. Made for 1920x1080 laptops with SSD I guess.

      What I think we're missing out is where we seemed to be going with Windows Vista and Mac OS X : 1990s desktop with awesomely detailed hi res/hi color icons and GUI elements.
      Imagine something like that, with the ease of changing graphics/theme you had in Windows 95 Plus! pack.

      We instead have to do with Gnome 2 / Gnome 2 clone and conservative themes to have something that works. We get very small features and fixes (e.g. improvements if you want to set the monitor on the right as the primary one) but e.g. Mate doesn't properly support a dual row task bar (makes the panel's other icons huge if you try to do).
      Mint appears to force me to have no scrollbar button. I would have to check what distros/environments still have scrollbar buttons and how the hell can you switch scrollbar style or if it's forever forbidden from now on.
      We're stuck in a very narrow path : 2004-looking Gnome 2 or Xfce, but with clever scrollbars we can't change (it's painful when on a website where middle-click scrolling will click on things for instance)

      I dislike Xfce for minor things too, but have to say it's about as good (Whisker menu is both good and a bit shit). I'll be willing to try an Xfce 4.14 + mintmenu set up when 4.14 is out and if mintmenu as an applet is still a thing.

      The lack of Wayland is embarassing (for "3D" or high end desktops like Cinnamon and KDE especially). I don't think Mate Wayland or Xfce Wayland will be ready for Ubuntu 18.04, thus for Ubuntu LTS + Mate or Xfce, this will be another three-year wait!
      Maybe Wayland will be ready for Debian 10 - maybe.

    6. Re:Modern vs. Retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by forgetting more than you will ever know,
        we're able to do more than you can imagine.
      We move the world without moving our palms
        while you point at pretty

      now go back to your coding zoo, the keeper's waiting

    7. Re:Modern vs. Retro by Zobeid · · Score: 1

      > Mint appears to force me to have no scrollbar button. I would have to check what distros/environments still have scrollbar buttons and how the hell can you switch scrollbar style or if it's forever forbidden from now on.

      I noticed that too when I briefly looked into Mint. What were they thinking? I didn't stick with it long enough to see if I could change that in the theme somehow.

      The default theme in Ubuntu MATE provides large, green, always-visible scrollbars. It does make Window resizing very fiddly, though, since you have to hit an exact 1-pixel spot with your pointer -- but that's easily fixed with a tweak to the Metacity theme, or by switching to a different one. I found one called Electronica FX that I rather like.

    8. Re:Modern vs. Retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mint has various installs: Cinnamon, MATE, KDE, and Xfce. So they don't 'force' a lack of scroll button, I can vouch for KDE having them and I can't imagine Xfce would have removed them since the last time I used it as they tend to stick to the traditional UI.

  20. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logs are required for security! I don't understand why they can't grok that.

  21. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even that doesn't usually work. Do a Google search for "systemd restart not working," and you'll find almost a half a millions results. Even that minor feature doesn't work.

  22. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either he doesn't understand or doesn't care. Both results are the same.

  23. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they don't care? They're making Linux more like Windows.

  24. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think any of the systemd devs have experience in the real world so they just don't damn get it.

  25. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    systemd doesn't restart services by design. According to this:

    https://serverfault.com/questions/759764/systemd-does-not-restart-service-although-restart-always

    you have to set other settings in order to get systemd to honor that setting. It sucks that something we so often need and should be so obvious is not according to systemd's design. If I set restart to always, I damn expect it to try to restart instead of Lennart making the decision to not restart.

  26. Re:ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That isn't what Lennart Poettering takes that setting to mean. According to him, it means restart a few times then hatefully just stop trying. With, as the GP noted, just sending log messages to /dev/null and refusing to try to restart services, he has proven he doesn't give a damn about servers. We need things to work and need logging.

  27. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. Anyone that doesn't think logs are important has never managed a lot of servers or dealt with security problems.

  28. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well writing to /dev/null is pretty damn fast so I don't blame them for cheating on benchmarks.

  29. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point about either option being the same. We need logs. Dammit.

  30. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get what you measure. The systemd people are measuring the wrong things.

  31. Smart? Really? by Chryana · · Score: 1

    In other words, the company is better controlling the user experience, and that is smart.

    Is that really smart? What attracts customers to System76 computers? Is it their superior software, or their (from what I've heard) sturdy, reliable hardware? You are given the choice between running Ubuntu or some obscure distribution that hardly anybody uses. System76 will probably not be able to make a community which is even the tenth of the size of the one for Ubuntu. If you run this distribution, few people will be able to help you if the issue happens on a component that differs even slightly from vanilla Ubuntu.

    On a more general note, most of the software differentiation efforts that are run on Windows and Android have always looked to me like wasted efforts. When I buy a computer with Windows, one of the first things I will do is remove most, if not all of the manufacturer software that was bundled with it, since almost all of it is useless and/or undesirable. The situation on Android is even worse, in my opinion. The interface is often arbitrarily modified for no good reason, to the point that an upgrade of the Android version will move half the settings around. From having tried Nexus and Samsung phones, the GUI "improvements" are questionable at best, and they always make it difficult to make similar changes on different devices.

  32. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an honest microsoft based admin. Haven't used Linux in production for 6 years due to change of job before I retired.
    But just from a troubleshooting point of view, those logs being so jacked up would cause me enough concern that I would keep from using such setups unless i have no choice. It's simply not worth the headaches from the way everyone keeps reporting such issues. No I don't like parts of Windows 10 but I do like it overall. I'll stick with win7x64 until whenever I feel like it.

    -geekpoet

  33. And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a perfect example of why Linux was never a real competitor to OSX and Windows, instead of actually investing their time and money into an already established OS? Lets just follow a lame trend so old its an XKCD joke.

    Because this is EXACTLY what Linux needed, yet another distro with just enough changes to make it incompatible with everyone else...sigh. Can you imagine how kick ass Linux would have been if instead of reinventing the damned wheel 600+ times everyone got together and invested their time into simply making ONE DISTRO that was the absolute best, cleanest, and bug free OS they could possibly build? It would make OSX and Windows look like DOS!

    But no, instead we have SSDD, one of 600+ distros to pile on distrowatch which will probably either be dead in less than 3 years or have less users than win98 in 2017, because God forbid people actually work together for the common good instead of more NIH bullshit...sigh.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    1. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

    2. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by r0kk3rz · · Score: 2

      Yeah and it would be great if unicorns existed too. The reason for the 600+ distros is that there is an increasing level of overhead the more people are involved in a project, especially if those people are volunteers.

      Now, get those people who are introverts to self select themselves and you can see why the OSS landscape is the way it is. Volunteer hackers want to write code, and not manage projects, and they're usually quite opinionated about the way-things-should-be and so its a lot easier to fork and get things done rather than coordinate with others.

    3. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 0

      Yep, and that's the curse of the FOSS. If there were restrictions on distribution things would be much better. But then I guess Stallman and other uber-zealots will pour shit on it - "It doesn't respect your freedom, it's a malware, blah, blah, blah...".

    4. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Zobeid · · Score: 2

      I used to feel this way, and I still do to some degree, but I think Linux fragmentation also has some advantages. Many of these obscure distros are trying out new ideas, they're experiments, and that kind of experimentation can't happen in the Windows and Mac worlds.

      Also, they give us a way to route around failure. Gnome Shell was not well received by many. So what happened? Ubuntu created the Unity interface. Well, that wasn't well received by many either. So what happened? Mint created Cinnamon, and somebody else forked the Gnome 2 code to create MATE, and now those who don't like Gnome Shell or Unity can shrug and keep on trucking. If you don't like the direction Microsoft or Apple have taken, you're out of luck.

      And as for compatibility, it seems like within a given distro family (e.g. Debiant/Ubuntu/Mint) this is not much of a problem.

      From my perspective, I've been watching and dabbling with Linux for years and years, and it always seemed half-baked, I always ran into problems. Now, in 2017, I'm finding that some Linux distros (Ubuntu MATE is the one I happened to latch onto) have finally reached a level of functionality that I deem acceptable, while Mac OS X (err, "macOS" now) seems to be backsliding in the other direction.

      Maybe the fabled "Year of the Linux Desktop" can only happen after everyone else thinks the desktop doesn't matter anymore.

    5. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by strikethree · · Score: 0

      It is cute that you think something should be centrally controlled. If you disagree with my assessment, re-read your own words. Central control is implicit within what you are saying.

      For myself, I fail to see a problem, and in all actuality, I see the numerous competing distros as ideal. To me, this is just like evolution: lots of little variations with constant pressure killing off the less useful variations. Eventually, we will end up with some fairly advanced, possibly sentient, Linux distributions. It may take a few million more years, but meh. Time is not a serious issue.

      If you choose not to have an enlightened and relaxed view and feel that human control MUST be impressed upon the process, then feel free to do it yourself. Nobody but people like yourself will try to stop you (cant have too much choice).

      Billions of choices may be confusing for new people, but then, new people probably should be relying on those with more knowledge rather than relying on some mystical entity to put out an approved "Linux must be this way" distro.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    6. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my reading of that post was that the author was more interested in some central coordination rather than central control - the world isn't as black and white as you are making it out. There could, and absolutely should, be space for experimentation. However, there is no denying that having effort be even a little more directed towards the major issues and requirements of the community would be more beneficial than everyone reinventing the wheel because they don't like the thickness of other people's spokes.

    7. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by knope · · Score: 1

      or, you could look at it like this. Its Debian based, so all the things developed will at some point (if there good enough) find there way back into the mainline. Its Debian based, so all the things develop can be utilized in some form or fashion on other debian based distros. The thing to focus on here is this: System76 is still around, and still improving. They're still providing laptops that you can roll you own debian distro on, and find working supported drivers for. Stop focusing on the aspects that are designed to target menial users who wouldn't know why they're supposed to chose linux in the first place, and go have a biscuit. :D

    8. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i support the statement , but 2 or 3 big distro , and a flock of flavor is nice too , for me all apt based os are Debian and all yum are redhat , after that it's just a question of packages installed in userspace and this is not OS layer but application

    9. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i beg to differ , pretty much sure there are now more linux users then windows and OS (caugh FreeBSD ) out there , just count android handsets .....

    10. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine how kick ass Linux would have been if instead of reinventing the damned wheel 600+ times everyone got together and invested their time into simply making ONE DISTRO that was the absolute best, cleanest, and bug free OS they could possibly build?

      Why would anyone do that? How does that help your project? Bragging rights?

      Linux doesn't compete with Windows. Ubuntu competes with Windows. And do does Red Hat. And so does..yadda yadda.

      For whatever you're actually trying to do, your kick-ass ONE DISTRO might actually be lamer and less good than Ubuntu. Or it might be better than Ubuntu but inferior to Red Hat for that application, but inferior to Ubuntu yet better than Red Hat for something else.

      One of the (many) reasons that Windows and OSX aren't all that great, is that they try to be one-size-fits all for people, and everyone who tries to do that always fails. Pretty much no matter who you are and what you're trying to do, the makers of Windows and OSX fucked up and their products are pretty lame -- we merely all disagree on what and how they fucked up, because everyone wants different things! And there would be the same arguments over your ONE DISTRO. And the same applies to them all.

      Except the lucky few. There's surely a lucky 1% who just happen to be doing just the right things where Ubuntu is perfect for them. And there's another lucky 1% for whom Windows is a great fit. But most of us settle for something that we hope is good enough, most of the time.

      Your ONE DISTRO would be the same, and Be The 15th. You were afraid of that, and set out to avoid it, and then became your own enemy.

      Diversity is the correct answer. There shouldn't be 15 distros; there should be 15 million of them. 15 distros means you're probably not going to find a great one, though you will very likely find one that is good enough. Be thankful there isn't just one distro, because you probably wouldn't like it, any more than you just happen to like Windows or OSX.

    11. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by WallyL · · Score: 1

      Stop focusing on the aspects that are designed to target menial users who wouldn't know why they're supposed to chose linux in the first place

      I don't think those are the clientèle that visit System76's retail site.

    12. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to feel this way, and I still do to some degree, but I think Linux fragmentation also has some advantages. Many of these obscure distros are trying out new ideas, they're experiments, and that kind of experimentation can't happen in the Windows and Mac worlds.

      And what of those ideas has actually turned into something that has been compelling to the general desktop userbase? None. It's a nice idea but in reality it just doesn't amount to anything.

      Also, they give us a way to route around failure. Gnome Shell was not well received by many. So what happened? Ubuntu created the Unity interface. Well, that wasn't well received by many either. So what happened? Mint created Cinnamon, and somebody else forked the Gnome 2 code to create MATE, and now those who don't like Gnome Shell or Unity can shrug and keep on trucking. If you don't like the direction Microsoft or Apple have taken, you're out of luck.

      I get your point but I think you're attaching too much importance to it, take Windows 8 for example: Sure the UI was different and they eliminated the start menu but all my applications ran exactly the same as they did on previous versions of Windows, the only difference was that if I used the start menu previously then I had to open them in a different way. A lot of people seem to think that was a way bigger deal than it actually was, in reality nobody really cared about it. You could even install classic shell or some other shell if you wanted just like you can on Linux but it really wasn't that much of a problem.

    13. Re:And folks wondered why Linux never competed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux on laptops can still be a PITA, so designing a distro that is custom designed for their laptop hardware seems like a step in the right direction.

  34. name like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a name like that, they MUST be targeting the Apple crowd...ROTFLMAO

  35. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump = Fat Orange Bitch

  36. Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed the phrase "code of conduct" in the summary. System76 must've been commandeered by SJWs. I'll take my business elsewhere.

  37. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be willing to live with the problems if they would just fix their logger.

    Why are you trying to bargain with deaf and dumb idiots?

    Just ditch any and all code by those assholes. Problem solved forevermore.

  38. I for one understand they think about it... by Herve5 · · Score: 2

    We now have two laptops that we bought with Linux preinstalled, and specs above Apple's at the time we ordered (in January). We didn't get them from Syst76 because delivering abroad from the US and with 'local' keyboards wasn't feasible for them, we ordered from Tuxedo in Germany. Honestly, from casings to processors they really look similar, there musn't be so many equipment suppliers.

    Well, Tuxedo explain they also raised this question of developing their own versions of linux flavors (you can select which linux you want with Tux), but they instead chose to prepare a separate package dedicated to their hardwares, which one can apply after a standard linux install.
    (Their commitment on this only works with a 'short list' of linux versions -most of them Ubuntu based IIRC.)

    I believe, if you are serious in proposing a range of hardware with linux preinstalled, sooner or later you cannot but consider you are at risk whenever any linux update is issued, and these are issued in a manner you can't control.

    Syst76 way is one reaction, Tuxedo's is another, but I do understand that when your full business is potentially killable by an unexpected update you think about it.
    And when I say killable it's very real, just imagine suddenly all your machines do not support e. g. bluetooth -a single, minor feature like that. Within hours, in ten forums, hundreds of posters will insult you, you sell sh.., doesn't work, don't buy that.
    I for one wouldn'd sleep before deciding for a strategy...

    --
    Herve S.
    1. Re:I for one understand they think about it... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      System76 has sold rebranded Clevo laptops for years. They've also offered their own apt repo for updates and drivers for years (at least the 5 or so years I've had my laptop).

      Personally, I think developing a new OS is completely wasted effort on their part. Especially considering they have an alternative means to push whatever drivers they need on their equipment via repos. They could also push configuration that way for whatever flat crap look and feel they want.

  39. Re: ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SystemD is just a disaster. I went FreeBSD as it looks like all of the Linux systems will get infected sooner or later.

  40. Re: by kurkosdr · · Score: 2

    Mandriva, Xandros, Ubuntu, PCLinuxOS, LinuxMint, Steam OS and now this... There is always someone who looks at Desktop Linux and thinks "this is 85% percent done, all it needs is a new coat of paint and some drivers/codecs". The hard reality is that, unless Desktop Linux distros solve the "not compatible even with itself" problem (hint: The 14.04 LTS I use in work cannot even have the latest version of VLC), Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere. Unless Desktop Linux manages to drop the idiotic "one repo per version" approach (which is contrary to the industry-standard approach of picking a "base" version and launching a single binary that works from that version all the way to the latest version, with differences being worked with static libraries and shims, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere. That's how Windows, OS X, Android and iOS do it. I can download the latest version of VLC on Windows Vista, and it is the same .exe that Windows 10 uses.

  41. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's also the reason why a single exploit on one userland application would affect all versions of Windows.
    It is painful to have different repo for each distro, but hey convenience and security are always opposites.

  42. Name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this company should get another name. System76 is no "sexy" at all. Your product may be a quality one, but getting a better branding is also an improvement.

    1. Re:Name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because names are just the most important factor in a product are they?
      When that is the bone of contempt-ion for internet whiners, you can safely say your product is a technical success.

  43. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian + XFCE here too.

    It works beautifully. May eventually switch to i3, but got no complaints about XFCE.

  44. More pop culture? by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

    Don't we have enough pop in our culture already?

    --
    "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
  45. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's against the linux culture to be backward compatible. That's why pulse audio and systemd exist. They MUST break things. If you want stability, use a BSD.

  46. Fedora on a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I want is Fedora on a laptop, since Fedora and Centos are what I use anyway. I have never bought a System76 computer because they're Ubuntu based.

  47. Get rid of Systemd .. by najajomo · · Score: 1

    Get rid of Systemd and I'll buy one ..

    1. Re:Get rid of Systemd .. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      See:
      http://without-systemd.org/wik...

      --Of course, if the hardware requires custom drivers that aren't in the Linus tree, I'd look elsewhere...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  48. this iant an O S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh come on , this is not an OS , or even a distribution , the OS is linux , the distribution is debian and the flavor Ubuntu , adding a few bells a whistles doesnt make a new distro and even less a new OS , this is at best what pretty much every seasoned Linux user does to their boxes anyhow

  49. This is why Linux is a pain in ass!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good idea, make another freaking custom linux distro just because you can. So it will just be another distro where things dont work smoothly. so sad...

  50. counterpoint... by gosand · · Score: 1

    What if this had ALWAYS been done? We most likely wouldn't have many of the great things we have now. Would we have a single perfect linux distro? I think that is wishful thinking.

    Just have a look at this: Linux Distro Timeline and tell me that none of those things should have happened. Maybe SOME of them shouldn't, but that's a simple determination in hindsight.

    Just look at what Knoppix spawned, and what it inspired. Sometimes you have to let the ones passionate about something run with it. Otherwise, it's death-by-committee.

    The biggest strength can also be the biggest downfall... so while complaining about all the multitude of distros, which is comically overwhelming, some really great things have come out of that process which I firmly believe wouldn't have happened with a single driving direction.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:counterpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if this had ALWAYS been done? We most likely wouldn't have many of the great things we have now.

      Like what? What things have come out of the fragmented Linux landscape that users have said "yeah that feature is a *must have* feature"?

    2. Re:counterpoint... by gosand · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's rather hard to say for sure, and the counter-argument will be "but we could have created that anyway". But just off the top of my head..

      - bootable distros. I remember the days when if you wanted to install a new version, you had to just do that. Everyone was thinking "just make the installer easier" but then the bootable distros came along and changed the game.

      - Raspberry Pi. If there was only one distro, nobody might think it was worth it to create a small set of hardware if the thinking was only for desktop

      - Android? Perhaps. With one distro, there would undoubtedly have been desire for control. That leads to stifling innovation, and just DOING new things.

      - the various package managers, which absolutely improved the entirety of linux distros, ability to install, upgrade, and maintain systems.

      - DEs. I love XFCE. There are others that are loved by many. Recently there is Cinnamon and MATE. If I had to use some "committee approved" DE I am sure there are things about it I wouldn't like.

      - ANY package or app that you like. Maybe GIMP wouldn't be where it is now. Maybe not Libreoffice, or Firefox, or Chrome, or Chromebooks. Because if something didn't get approved by "THE" distro, it would be pointless to make it. Choice is the key, without that as a foundation, it's all about the committee approval.

      - Google builds a lot of what it needs in-house, including their own distro. Would any of those variants be "allowed" in a controlled, 1-distro world?

      That's the thing... by being an open landscape (you use the term fragmented) things are possible. Things are allowed to happen because no one entity controls it. It's evolutionary. If Debian didn't happen, then Ubuntu didn't happen, then Mint didn't happen. Probably the easiest way to conceptualize it is to look at what happens if it is NOT what Linux is.... Microsoft, Apple. Closed, walled gardens. Failed software and even companies along the way that got squashed because they weren't "preferred" by the powers that be.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  51. Re: not compatible with itself by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    > The 14.04 LTS I use in work cannot even have the latest version of VLC)

    --You pick an LTS distro for *long-term stability*, not the latest versions of software. Things tend to break sometimes when you use the testing or unstable branches. I use 14.04-64-LTS myself, and it's pretty rock solid - but starting to show its age after 3 years. If I want newer versions of software, I put up a Vmware or Virtualbox VM and install Antix or MX (no systemd) or even go beyond my existing triple-boot setup if it really needs to run on bare metal.

    --There are more choices than that (LMDE, Devuan, Fedora, SuSE, etc), but I tend to prefer Debian-derived package systems and something that can actually survive a dist-upgrade in-situ without reinstalling.

    > I can download the latest version of VLC on Windows Vista, and it is the same .exe that Windows 10 uses

    --Yep, and you have to deal with the in-OS spyware, rampant virus and malware/cryptoware infection risks along with it. We can all see how that's working out for the Ukraine.

    --Snap packages show some promise, but since Ubuntu 16.04 was such a terrible experience for me I haven't looked into it yet. Dunno if they ported Snap back to 14.04, but they have backported rebootless kernel patching for it recently.

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  52. Re:ssytemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious: did you automate posting this and all the "me too" replies? Or do you post all messages still lovingly by hand?

  53. Re: not compatible with itself by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    "You pick an LTS distro for *long-term stability*, not the latest versions of software." Windows 7 allows me to have *long-term stability* and have the latest versions of software, which means it relieves me from having to go through the "to LTS or not to LTS" dilemma. From that perspective, the price of a Windows license is a bargain. I can stay with the old version for years till I am ready to upgrade and still have new software like VLC. And without having to experiment with VMs and whatnot. "Yep, and you have to deal with the in-OS spyware, rampant virus and malware/cryptoware infection risks along with it. " Because as we all know, Desktop Linux is magically immune to cryptoware (despite the fact apps have access by default to the user's home directory). Also, no viruses for me for a decade. I just don't mess with the factory settings for Update (as you should on Desktop Linux too) and don't download junk executables from dubious places (as you should on Desktop Linux too). Also, take off the tinfoil hat.