Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Ashley Madison Parent in $11.2 Million Settlement Over Data Breach (reuters.com)

Posted by msmash on from the Life-is-short,-have-a-settlement dept.

From a report: The owner of the Ashley Madison adultery website said on Friday it will pay $11.2 million to settle U.S. litigation brought on behalf of roughly 37 million users whose personal details were exposed in a July 2015 data breach. Ruby Corp, formerly known as Avid Life Media Inc, denied wrongdoing in agreeing to the preliminary class-action settlement, which requires approval by a federal judge in St. Louis. Ashley Madison marketed itself as a means to help people, primarily men, cheat on their spouses, and was known for its slogan "Life is short. Have an affair."

78 comments

  1. cheap by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

    " $11.2 million to settle U.S. litigation brought on behalf of roughly 37 million users "

    Here's a quarter, kid. Go away.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:cheap by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      True but anyone looking to undermine their own marriage really isn't deserving of money let alone pity.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " $11.2 million to settle U.S. litigation brought on behalf of roughly 37 million users "

      Here's a quarter, kid. Go away.

      It looks like the money is first come first served, with lawyer first to come:
              "Lawyers for Ashley Madison users may receive up to one-third of the $11.2 million payout to cover legal fees, court papers show."

      After that it's:
              "... users with valid claims can recoup up to $3,500 depending on how well they can document their losses attributable to the breach."

    3. Re:cheap by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Two wrongs don't make a right. Also, many married people cheat.

      --
      Avantgarde Hebrew science fiction
    4. Re:cheap by GNious · · Score: 1

      Is that 37 million users in the US? I.e. 11% of the entire(!) population?
      Might actually turn out to be 2 (two!) quarters per US, while Ashley Madison may be liable in other countries too...

    5. Re:cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " $11.2 million to settle U.S. litigation brought on behalf of roughly 37 million users "

      Here's a quarter, kid. Go away.

      Also 36.5 million of those users are fake accounts created by Ashley Madison staff. So only about $150K needs to actually leave the company.

    6. Re:cheap by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Here's a quarter, kid. Go away.

      Ahh, a two bit relationship.

    7. Re:cheap by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      While your statement is true, I was left wondering if you actually meant "swing" instead of "cheat".

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    8. Re:cheap by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      US population of 18+ is ~230M in 2010 (US. Census Bureau). 49% of that is ~112M.

      Class action lawsuit on behalf of the ~37M "users" whose details were exposed. Do we know how many of those 37M were dupes, fake, outside the US, or otherwise invalid? Is 50% a reasonable SWAG? If 19M were legit we're basically looking at about 1 in 6 men in the adult population had an AM account.

      That number seems high to me, but what do I know. (My wife keeps telling me "Jon Snow, you know nothing.")

    9. Re:cheap by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I meant cheat, as in "doing sexual things with others that your partner doesn't want to". While this definitely includes fucking others when you claim you don't, it also includes some cases of swinging where one partner (surprisingly, in my 40+ circles, it's usually the female one) coerces the other into going along with it.

      --
      Avantgarde Hebrew science fiction
    10. Re:cheap by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That number seems high to me, but what do I know. (My wife keeps telling me "Jon Snow, you know nothing.")

      Won't anyone think of the poor fembots that made up most of what the men chatted with?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:cheap by mi · · Score: 1

      And to claim yours, judging by the usual verbiage of such settlement agreements, the victims would have to list, when they opened an account, what their username was, how much they paid and other details... And it will, probably, all become part of the official record somewhere — not just buried in a database dump on "Dark Web".

      No one expects anyone other than the lawyers to get paid. But that may be good enough — because the point here was not to compensate the victims, but to punish the wrong-doers. Whether $11mln is a lot or not depends on what the company brought in before it all broke apart due to the data-breach.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ashley Madison had an obligation to protect their privacy. That's what's at stake here, so whether they are "deserving" is irrelevant.
      Also, we all sin in our own ways so careful about being self-righteous.

    13. Re:cheap by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The sum is at the very least missing 3 zeros. As long as data-breaches can be laughed off in this fashion, nothing is going to change.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:cheap by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true caveman.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re: cheap by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Coercion is not cheating - there are many reasons one may not really want to but still does, often to keep the relationship intact. Neither is every instance of your partner not knowing cheating simply because some may end up liking it, some may not want to know.

      Cheating imho is going against the explicit wishes of the other party without their knowledge although those wishes are often established through contract law (marriage).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    16. Re:cheap by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

      I never claimed it was right, just that I feel they are undeserving of money or pity.

      Also, many married people cheat.

      You speak as if that somehow makes it less wrong.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    17. Re:cheap by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You speak as if that somehow makes it less wrong.

      Having an affair is not illegal. Whether it is "wrong" or not is none of your business unless you are one of the people in the relationship. You should learn to focus on your own life, and be less judgemental about other people.

      Look around the world. People have affairs everywhere. But how much people are publicly subjected to the moral judgement of others varies widely and is negatively correlated with quality of life. Would you rather live in Saudi Arabia? Learn to be tolerant, and mind your own business.

    18. Re:cheap by ark1 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to give some change back to the lawyers.

    19. Re:cheap by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      No one expects anyone other than the lawyers to get paid.

      Class action lawsuits don't work that way. There is almost always a requirement that a minimum percentage of the "class" needs to accept the settlement for the payout to be triggered. If not enough victims sign-on, then the plaintiff lawyers get nothing.

      They may have difficulty reaching the threshold, since many of the accounts likely have bogus or outdated contact info.

    20. Re: cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a huge number of cases (certainly not all), it's hurting the other person. But I guess in some cultures it's fine to beat up queers or children, so keep your nose out of other people's business on that, too.

    21. Re:cheap by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Having an affair is not illegal. Whether it is "wrong" or not is none of your business unless you are one of the people in the relationship.

      Actually, as a fellow member of society, I have a vested interest in maintaining the current perception that people having affairs be reviled.

      You should learn to focus on your own life, and be less judgemental about other people.

      You are judging me for judging others and telling me that I shouldn't! Your hypocrisy is quite delicious. :)

      Look around the world. People have affairs everywhere. But how much people are publicly subjected to the moral judgement of others varies widely and is negatively correlated with quality of life.

      And?

      Would you rather live in Saudi Arabia?

      A non-sequitur? How cute!

      Learn to be tolerant,

      Get yourself a dictionary because there is a large difference between tolerating people and accepting their bad behavior. I tolerate them just fine.

      and mind your own business.

      Nah, you can fuck right off. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    22. Re:cheap by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Hey now, that's not nothing. It's almost a tenth of what their CEO is worth!!!

      Also appears you'll need to prove you were affected with documentation in order to collect it. Of course I guess if it was already in the divorce proceedings, that shouldn't be too hard.

    23. Re:cheap by mi · · Score: 1

      It may happen... Or they may ask the judge to lower the requirement because of the special circumstances of the case — and look for the already-divorced among the victims...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    24. Re:cheap by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Or they may ask the judge to lower the requirement ../

      RTFS. It is a settlement. A judge can accept or reject it, but cannot change it.

    25. Re:cheap by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      exactly. owners should be held criminally responsible too.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    26. Re: cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume only men had accounts there? You must not know many women.

    27. Re:cheap by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      It looks like the money is first come first served, with lawyer first to come

      Ironically, the lawyers have probably come more times than the people who had their data breached......

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    28. Re:cheap by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Having an affair is not illegal. Whether it is "wrong" or not is none of your business unless you are one of the people in the relationship.

      It's still a public health issue. STDs exist, basic human compassion dictates caring about friends and even strangers having their health unknowingly endangered.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    29. Re: cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Disagree.

      Marriage is different things to different people. This is 2017 and I have raised my children to mate with someone who will make good parents for their children... and when the kids are grown up, they should either stay with each other or go their separate ways.

      Marriage is generate associated with reproduction. Depending on your culture or religion, polygamy could be acceptable if not preferred by all parties involved. There are many advantages to polygamy as it builds a far stronger family and also provides far better economical and support infrastructures for children. In fact, a healthy and wealthy 50 year old man who plays little more than a secondary role in child rearing is probably a far better option for women who decide to raise children together than a young buck who looks like he might have potential. It would be selective breeding that would produce a far stronger family and healthier stock of offspring. But, obviously this is a very analytical, cold and heartless view. It would have also robbed me of the opportunity to have been a happily married man with two wonderful children. Though, my wife would have been far better off in a polygamist relationship with 2-3 close girl friends and a healthier and wealthier older man.

      Marriage is a weakness in society. While I take my marriage very seriously and have never cheated on my wife and even avoid heavy intoxication in an environment where temptation would combine poorly with impaired judgement (as I fear I would do something I'd regret given the opportunity), and I fear some day my little girl will have her heart broken by someone less discerning of their decisions than I am, I don't condemn men who cheat... at least not for cheating.

      Cheating happens because people enter commitments they don't understand, don't take seriously, or aren't ready to make at the time.

      People who marry at 18 don't even know what a life long commitment means. They like the idea, it's exciting and grown up and "the responsible thing to do", but it means taking a child who isn't even out of puberty and having them make a commitment to a person for 80 years before they even know themselves let alone the person they're committing to or who they'll become.

      Many guys marry girls thinking ... it'll make her happy. And it does until they both end up miserable and they are staying together just because they don't want to get divorced.

      Many guys marry girls because they look so good... then they start seeing things that look better. Of course girls who marry guys who think that way chose very poorly.

      I can go on, but 80 year commitments to people who will change ... A LOT over time is a really stupid idea and this is 2017 and girls shouldn't want this anymore anyway since marriage is like saying "I can't take care of myself". Finding a father for their child should be a 16-20 year commitment, and if love can be the basis... GREAT!! And if after 16-20 years, they still want to be together.. AWESOME!!! But traditional marriage is a disaster waiting to happen.

      I love my wife and I need her and will never risk what we have. But she has given me 20 amazing years of her life and if she would be happier with someone better suited to her as she gets older, maybe even leave me to live with a friend of hers instead, she will still be my best friend and I will still love her. Many relationships evolve into something like this anyway. The man does man things, the woman does woman things and they eat dinner together and when they get old, the push each other's wheel chairs and change each other's diapers.

      As for money, well, the lawyers will get most of it. The people who sued will get $10 after 2 hours of paperwork each. If anything, you should get a laugh knowing that they'll get the same as a bad waiter who gets a $0.20 tip on a $200 meal.

    30. Re: cheap by UsuallyReasonable · · Score: 1

      But I guess in some cultures it's fine to beat up queers or children, so keep your nose out of other people's business on that, too.

      That is a stupid argument. In fact, it isn't an argument at all. It's saying "unrelated B is bad therefore A is bad". Pick up a book on logic someday and see if you can assimilate any of it.

  2. Low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ~31 cents per claimant.
    Wow.

  3. The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real con here is not a data breach, it is the fact that they systematically generated fake female accounts to lure in paying male customers. This is outright fraud and they get away with it.
     

    1. Re:The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraud? I'm not so sure. I seriously doubt the ToS said anything about all accounts on the site being real.

      Consider this: Lets say I open a restaurant and want to make it look popular so I hire a bunch of people to hang out and make it look lively. Is that fraud?

    2. Re:The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraud? I'm not so sure. I seriously doubt the ToS said anything about all accounts on the site being real.

      Consider this: Lets say I open a restaurant and want to make it look popular so I hire a bunch of people to hang out and make it look lively. Is that fraud?

      Off hand I'd say yes, it is fraud. We even have a special name for those people and what you're doing. Shills. and Shilling.

      The law also looks to intent. If you hired those people to do a photo shoot – not fraud. If you hired them to be shills – fraud

      Oh, IANAL.

    3. Re: The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not illegal if they're not trying to scam people. "Generating buzz" is perfectly legal.

    4. Re:The real story: fake users. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They have a great business model. Commit fraud, and their customers are too embarrassed and have too much to lose to admit they were victims.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:The real story: fake users. by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Fraud? I'm not so sure. I seriously doubt the ToS said anything about all accounts on the site being real.

      Consider this: Lets say I open a restaurant and want to make it look popular so I hire a bunch of people to hang out and make it look lively. Is that fraud?

      Try this: you open a restaurant named "Great Italian Food", and all the windows are plastered with Italian cuisine pictures and slogans. You then charge for admission to the restaurant. Once inside, people are given a menu, which has Italian-sounding names, but when the dishes are served, it turns out they're actually Mexican and Thai dishes. Almost nothing on your menu is actually Italian food.

      Fraud, yes, probably. Because you advertised to establish an expectation of what was provided, and you don't provide that in any meaningful quantity.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    6. Re:The real story: fake users. by chispito · · Score: 1

      The real con here is not a data breach, it is the fact that they systematically generated fake female accounts to lure in paying male customers. This is outright fraud and they get away with it.

      The real con was convincing people they can have (or look for) affairs without consequences.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    7. Re:The real story: fake users. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Try this: you open a restaurant named "Great Italian Food", and all the windows are plastered with Italian cuisine pictures and slogans. You then charge for admission to the restaurant. Once inside, people are given a menu, which has Italian-sounding names, but when the dishes are served, it turns out they're actually Mexican and Thai dishes. Almost nothing on your menu is actually Italian food.

      This happened in Madrid without the Mexican or Thai. We found an Italian restaurant with the flags and pasta pictures. Inside we were offered only Spanish food. They were especially proud of their paella.

      Nice restaurant. Fraudulent advertising though.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    8. Re:The real story: fake users. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy. In AM's case, the ToS were available before payment. The ToS expilicity stated that AM could create accounts for "entertainment purposes". Just because the users were stupid, and didn't read the fine print, doesn't mean they were defrauded.

      Clue for the clueless: There are not really a lot of hot young women lining up to provide free sex to potbellied married 40-something men with receding hairlines.

    9. Re:The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to wonder if Donald Trump (or Jr. or Eric or Jared) had an account.

    10. Re:The real story: fake users. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      More concretely, they also charged money to delete your account, then didn't delete anything.

      Almost like the company set up this whole thing just out of disdain for their customer base of cheating dudes. Which, okay sure, but still bad idea even if there weren't innocent people caught up in it.

    11. Re:The real story: fake users. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Free, no...

      Paid, yes...

      Plenty of "pretty enough" young women are "happy enough" to provide sex to older men in exchange for "stuff and/or money".

      Frankly, I think it is absurd that fucking is legal and selling is legal, but that selling fucking isn't legal... (RIP George Carlin)

      And I'm a right wing God fearing gun carrying Texas conservative, but I don't think I should be telling willing adults what to do with their bodies or private lives.

      And yes, I support gay marriage, even if I think they are weird, because it isn't any of my business.

    12. Re:The real story: fake users. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      People at Donald Trump's level don't need a AM account to find girls, look at his wife...

    13. Re:The real story: fake users. by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy. In AM's case, the ToS were available before payment. The ToS expilicity stated that AM could create accounts for "entertainment purposes".

      Yeah, not going to accept the argument. There's a nice bit of literature involving a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "beware of leopard" that applies. Being able to create accounts for entertainment isn't at all "almost none of the women on this site are real". Morality of the people visiting the site aside, the site purported to be for married people to meet and hook up. Having a disclaimer in the fine-print is pretty much a serving of Crunchy Frog, or possibly Spring Surprise. If you're not familiar with those references, you'd be well-served to look them up... a worthwhile distraction, I promise.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    14. Re:The real story: fake users. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Free, no...

      Paid, yes...

      Ashley Madison = free sex
      Seekingarrangements.com = paid sex

    15. Re:The real story: fake users. by Tom · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, but that is a very classic piece of selective perception. Since we almost always (unless we are involved) see only the affairs that come to light, we assume that most if not all affairs do, eventually.

      But what is your guess about the number of affairs that nobody except those involved ever finds out about? You seriously think that is a low number? Got any evidence for that except wishful thinking?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:The real story: fake users. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I highly, highly doubt most of the actual women on AM were really into "free sex"...

      Some were, perhaps, but they can find that without going to a web site...

      More were looking for "stuff" in return for sex... it may not be money, plenty of girls tell themselves they are "good girls" because it isn't cash, but fancy dinner, trips, jewelry, etc. are the same thing...

    17. Re:The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, IANAL.

      Yeah, no shit. We could tell by the fact that you don't understand what "fraud" means.

    18. Re:The real story: fake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happened in Madrid without the Mexican or Thai. We found an Italian restaurant with the flags and pasta pictures. Inside we were offered only Spanish food. They were especially proud of their paella.

      Nice restaurant. Fraudulent advertising though.

      There are two groups of people laughing at your comment. There's your fellow Americans, who actually believe it went down like that. And then there's everyone else. They're imagining a dumb fucking Yank walking into a restaurant in another country and trying to tell the staff that their food is of the wrong ethnicity. You do realise that every single one of them ejaculated in your paella don't you?

    19. Re:The real story: fake users. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      This happened in Madrid without the Mexican or Thai. We found an Italian restaurant with the flags and pasta pictures. Inside we were offered only Spanish food. They were especially proud of their paella.

      Nice restaurant. Fraudulent advertising though.

      There are two groups of people laughing at your comment. There's your fellow Americans, who actually believe it went down like that. And then there's everyone else. They're imagining a dumb fucking Yank walking into a restaurant in another country and trying to tell the staff that their food is of the wrong ethnicity. You do realise that every single one of them ejaculated in your paella don't you?

      While the rest of the world laughs at your dim witted claim that I'm American. Since the paella was being cooked in the middle of the room, that would have been quite the spectacle.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    20. Re:The real story: fake users. by chispito · · Score: 1

      But what is your guess about the number of affairs that nobody except those involved ever finds out about? You seriously think that is a low number? Got any evidence for that except wishful thinking?

      Who said they had to be found out for there to be consequences?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    21. Re:The real story: fake users. by Tom · · Score: 1

      The context of the posting. Come on, that was a really cheap attempt at dodging the question.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:The real story: fake users. by chispito · · Score: 1

      The context of the posting. Come on, that was a really cheap attempt at dodging the question.

      I don't care about the question. It could be 5% or 95% of affairs are found out and it doesn't change that fact that somebody broke his or her word and that harms those who depend on that person and, most of all, it harms the people directly involved.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    23. Re:The real story: fake users. by Tom · · Score: 2

      and, most of all, it harms the people directly involved.

      The cheater and his/her lover? Not sure if they agree that they are harmed.

      The subject is much more complex than the simple moralistic approach. There are many cases where affairs destroyed or seriously harmed relationships. There are many cases where it harmed relationships, but the damage could be repaired. There are also cases where affairs helped or even saved relationships, because through the affair finally some deep-seated issues came to light.

      There are also many, many people who divorced or split because of an affair and are happy for it, having moved on to a better life. Did they get harmed?

      I'm not a supporter of affairs. In general, you should be able to talk to your spouse and there are today enough open relationships, polyamorous and other models that allow everyone to find the approach to love and relationships that is right for them.

      I just don't like oversimplifications.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  4. Re:Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember folks, don't feed the trolls...

  5. "Ashley Madison Settlement Fund" by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

    Wonder how many of those $.25 checks are going to get cashed.

    1. Re:"Ashley Madison Settlement Fund" by c8663 · · Score: 2

      No, it will not be a $0.12 check. Your forgetting the lawyers cut. The check will be closer to $0.05.

    2. Re:"Ashley Madison Settlement Fund" by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good point. And imagine the hilarity of the emails (or worse, snail mail) informing breach victims about the settlement. "Honey--what's this letter from Ashley Madison?"

    3. Re:"Ashley Madison Settlement Fund" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And all those AM fake accounts will take up 75% of the settlement, so AM just paid themselves.

  6. oh penis tree oh penis tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this post lacks the ASCII.

    Merry Christmas to all! This should be the best one yet!

  7. Re:Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    For every person of color in my neighborhood we have five white trash racists, two white crack or crystal meth addicts, a white child molester and a white tin hat wearing gun nut. The child molester and the gun nut hang out with each other in the park across the street from the elementary school. And this is in Chevy Chase, Maryland. I can't even begin to imagine what it's like living in a bad neighborhood.

  8. Suspicion by burtosis · · Score: 1

    Obligatory xkcd

  9. Re: Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your neighborhood has 30k people in it and only one POC? That sounds great!

  10. Re: Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maryland is a bad neighbourhood.

  11. Re:Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's really nothing you can do. Once niggers move in, they quickly take over.

    Watch "The Wire" for all you need to know to confirm your point of view.

  12. Re:Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol this is like the real life intro to Bad Boy for Life by Puff Daddy

    I'm sure the only action you will take is a drunken dump because anything else you do will probably get you arrested for harassing these fine upstanding citizens.

    Eat a bag of dicks ya confederate

  13. And the victim only gets half... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    The other half goes in the divorce settlement.

  14. Re:Enough is enough! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    >And this is in Chevy Chase, Maryland.

    Why did they name a neighborhood after a second rate comedian.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  15. Re: Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is a puff daddy? Sounds like some kind of candy or popcorn or something.

  16. How much will the female robots get? by Darkness+Of+Course · · Score: 1

    And what would they use it for more stack, RAM or a prioritized path to cache?

  17. Looks goofy but ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... 83% of the "37 million accounts" were fembots.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.