Slashdot Mirror


Amazon May Unveil Its Own Messaging App (engadget.com)

The messaging app field is as hot as ever with Apple, Facebook and Google (among others) slugging it out... and Amazon appears to want in on the action. From a report: AFTVnews claims to have customer survey info revealing that Amazon is working on Anytime, a messaging app for Android, iOS and the desktop that promises a few twists on the usual formula. It has mainstays like message encryption, video, voice and (of course) stickers, but it reportedly has a few hooks that would make it easy to sign up and participate in group chats. You would only need a name to reach out to someone, for one thing -- no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers here. You only have to use Twitter-style @ mentions to bring people into conversations or share photos, and you can color-code chats to identify the most important ones. Naturally, there are app-like functions (such as group music listening and food ordering) and promises of chatting with businesses for shopping or customer service.

87 comments

  1. just what we need, another messaging app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    just what we need, another messaging app

    1. Re:just what we need, another messaging app by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was going to say that. Maybe I should roll out a new messaging app to tell everyone. I can just say 'Oi, you' and it automagically knows who is meant. No need for twitter style hashtag shit, just go to the window and shout your message into the wind. It'll get there.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:just what we need, another messaging app by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Seriously, must be a case of silicon valley mistaking itself for everyone else."Everyone is totally going to download the latest app because it's the hot new thing!"

      I switched to a pay as you go plan for texts, thought "No problem, I'm on wifi all the time, I'll just switch to whatsapp." Realized no one I know actually uses whatsapp. Tried to get the maybe 5 people I regularly communicate with to download and set it up. "It's cheaper and you can use it from your computer."

      All it did was make me realize my closest friends and family like not downloading a new app more than they like talking with me :-(

    3. Re: just what we need, another messaging app by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      A great argument for applications that don't need any kind of explicit installation?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:just what we need, another messaging app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is already a universal messaging app built into every phone called SMS/MMS. This BS of more and more isolated messaging apps needs to stop. I just recently ridded my phone of all messaging apps other than SMS/MMS and google hangouts for those i keep in touch with overseas where SMS/MMS can be expensive.

      If anyone I know tries to get me on the latest messaging app fad i just flat out tell them send me a txt.

    5. Re:just what we need, another messaging app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until there is one that is both cross platform (ios, android, windows, macOS, and linux at least), properly encrypted, and not tied to a phone number, they can keep trying in my book.

  2. no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers here by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    Good idea. If only someone had it before...

  3. Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    their collaboration app was.

    If there's an executable in the AppData directory I consider their app a failure already.

    If there's no Linux version - especially considering how much Amazon themselves relies on Linux it's an even bigger failure than I originally thought.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If there's no Linux version

      Of course there will no no linux version. Not nearly enough people to advertise to and the ones that there are will say 'fuck this shit'

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's no Linux version - especially considering how much Amazon themselves relies on Linux it's an even bigger failure than I originally thought.

      And your opinion matters, why?

    3. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they are shedding crocodile tears that they will be only able to reach 99.9% of users that matter in the 2+ billion plus pool of users between desktops and mobile devices.

    4. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Because I'm not an A/C.

      Also, I'm a part of Slashdot. I've found that if you pay attention to the opinion of Slashdot you find a general reading of how the industry is doing right or wrong. If people at Amazon are paying attention to what is being said on the Slashdot it could make or break them.

      Consider my non-A/C opinion as doing Amazon a favor.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    5. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      But I'm part of the I.T. department and I make and contribute to decisions. Because I'm part of that not as low of a percent as you portray I'm not happy with it. Because I'm not happy with it, I'm not giving my Windows and Mac users either. Either you take care of me or my user base is just as alienated from their stuff as I am.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    6. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon Employees who use Linux can't even get them to produce a Linux Client when they roll out internal shit.

    7. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I know why they won't do it. I've had discussions with plenty of people both online and in person that make decisions for organizations. They see Linux as some sort of "scary land run by barbarian tribes where the law is decided by the one best with a sword". You can't support Linux! There's no one responsible for it, there's no standards! We don't want to have to support it on Windows, why would we ever want to support it for scary barbarians!

      They don't realize Linux support is even easier than Mac or Windows. You put a .tar.gz out there and if users want the thing to work the distros will make packages for you. All you have to do is make the .tar.gz work for yourselves internally and tell the users "we don't support it, talk to your distro". Or "we did it on this version of linux by putting these files here, here, and here, good luck."

      These companies act like they're an insurance company for a car rental place and a Linux user is a chimp that shows up with a note and $100 bill pinned to it's collar asking for a sedan for two days.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    8. Re:Let's hope it's not the no-Linux AppData bomb by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And why release a Linux version? Either people will complain it's not open source, and send annoying petitions about it. Or the Linux version will be used for reverse engineering the protocol because the debug tools on Linux are so much better than on Windows.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  4. Have the developers work on the Amazon Video app by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Still missing a tvOS one.

  5. Just in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully people i know will adopt it enough that i can finally ditch Messages and the iPhone.

    1. Re:Just in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?
      As if there aren't enough alternatives already out there...
      Or do you want to give eveything you put in a message to Amazon for 'marketing purposes'?
      If you are then frankly, you are mad.

  6. Another App to ignore by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    If someone wants to use a messaging app, I'm sure by now they've decided on one they like. Unless this is linked into the reviews or questions on Amazon store I'm not sure the point.

    If it IS linked into the Amazon store, I'm never asking/answering a question again and I'm not reviewing anything again.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Another App to ignore by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      If someone wants to use a messaging app, I'm sure by now they've decided on one they like. Unless this is linked into the reviews or questions on Amazon store I'm not sure the point.

      If it IS linked into the Amazon store, I'm never asking/answering a question again and I'm not reviewing anything again.

      I'd be willing to put money on them doing exactly that. It'll recognise products and link to them for easy shopping, of course they'll just do it on the sly at first until it's going then they'll ramp it up in an update and call it a feature.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Another App to ignore by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I can picture the first time calling someone an arsehole on the app and a wavy double blue line appears under the word... so you click it and it takes you to anal beads for sale.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Another App to ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your a doosh

    4. Re: Another App to ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Creimers Amazon affiliate link attached.

  7. And in a year ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    will we be hearing that Amazon is going to be selling our names and chat contents to third parties for advertising purposes?

    1. Re:And in a year ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your Amazon homepage will just be updated with "recommendations" related to the stuff you've been chatting about.

    2. Re:And in a year ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I think I'll sign up just to see realdolls listed on Amazon.com

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  8. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, because IRC is so very hard to use.

  9. Another messaging app... by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    Obligatory XKCD : https://xkcd.com/1810/

    1. Re:Another messaging app... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would have picked this one: https://xkcd.com/927/

    2. Re:Another messaging app... by TWX · · Score: 1

      Funny, he apparently missed IRC, at least on a cursory scan, along with UNIX "talk".

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Another messaging app... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      IRC is just below Slack. Unix's "talk" isn't there as you suggest, but wall is. Happy to help ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Another messaging app... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps in the US. In most countries you have 1 or 2 dominant messengers (like WhatsApp), expensive sms and very expensive mms (although mms is being phased out now by some European providers).

    5. Re:Another messaging app... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unix's "talk" isn't there as you suggest, but wall is. Happy to help ;-)

      Check the hover-over text: "I'm one of the few Instagram users who connects solely through the Unix 'talk' gateway."

  10. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For casuals, it really is. Anyone on IRC knows their way around a computer.

  11. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

    It's not. Just build a 'Messenger like' client and anyone will be able to use it easily.

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  12. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIM

    MSN

    ICQ

    Yahoo

    all messengers you don't need a phone number for. Arguably better by default because you DON'T need one.

  13. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In chronological order of when I started using it, I now need to use, at least occasionally,

    Personal Email Account
    IRC
    AOL/AIM
    Spam Email Account
    ICQ
    Work Email Account
    Cellular/SMS
    BBM/PIN Messages
    New Personal Email Account (the original one became Spam 2)
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Google (Talk/Hangouts/Voice)
    iMessage
    WhatsApp
    Snapchat

    And....as soon as some idiot I know starts using it as their preferred form of communcation, drumroll please.....Amazon Messaging!

    I'm honestly fine with Email, SMS/iMessage and Voice Calls. Because those systems are non-proprietary and basically universal. Of course trying to explain to someone under 30 the benefits of using a global standard system instead of some "you're the product" OTT messaging offends them, so rather than triggering them I just install the latest app-du-jour and watch my battery life start draining even faster.

    Ain't the future grand?

    1. Re:So... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      In chronological order of when I started using it, I now need to use, at least occasionally,

      ...long list...

      And....as soon as some idiot I know starts using it as their preferred form of communcation, drumroll please.....Amazon Messaging!

      I'm honestly fine with Email, SMS/iMessage and Voice Calls. Because those systems are non-proprietary and basically universal.

      Just because someone you know wants to communicate using some proprietary messaging system doesn't mean you have to sign up for it. You can say "I don't use that. Email me instead".

      I'm not on any funky messaging system, just regular SMS. I'm not on Google or Facebook. People know if they want to reach me to text me or call me. Heck, even e-mail me. I don't do the whole sign up for flavor of the day crap.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:So... by TWX · · Score: 1

      The other problem is the issue that everyone seems to think their idea for a new chat system is something revolutionary when it's just reinventing the wheel.

      The Jabber/XMPP project attempted to create a truly universal protocol suite that could be implemented by any service to allow for cross-service communications, but so far the only entity that has a commercial version is Cisco with their Cisco Jabber product, and I'm not sure if it's actually cross-platform or if their XMPP implementation is restricted to other Cisco users. Either way they seem to be heading toward replacing their version of Jabber with Cisco Spark, which may well mean no more XMPP.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sms is expensive in most countries, that's why the messengers became popular on mobile on the first place. And it is not encrypted unless you use something like Silence. iMessage is Apple only and again, the US is the only country where Apple has a decent market share.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other problem is the issue that everyone seems to think their idea for a new chat system is something revolutionary when it's just reinventing the wheel.

      This isn't likely an attempt to reinvent the wheel. It's an attempt to make their own wheel on which they can attract a large enough following to secure a large piece of the upcoming wave of peer-to-peer money exchange business. Although you can of course do peer-to-peer money exchange with an app or a weblet (e.g. paypal/venmo, squarecash, google, etc), it's much more convenient integrated into the messaging app you use on a daily basis (e.g., wechatpay).

      Ironically, the biggest potential users in p2p money are not end users (the peers), but small businesses. Why split the check using group pay when you can micro-pay the vendor directly. If the vendor can bypass credit card merchant fees, all the better. This is already happening big-time in China with WeChatPay. You simply message the money to the business instead of pay with your linked credit card and by magic no 2% merchant fee, only a 0.6% fee. This will be a major threat to the credit card folks if it takes off.

      Facebook just launched their peer-to-peer money exchange feature and no doubt Amazon doesn't want to get left in the dust on this as this has the potential to allow them to edge-out paypal and the credit card companies from their costs of doing business. Amazon may not succeed in this endeavor, but hey, why just yield this space to facebook?

  14. WeChat wannabe perhaps by spinitch · · Score: 1

    WeChat embeds an impressive gamut of e-commerce within its messaging platform. Amazon may evolve some aspects tailoring for other markets where WeChat largely absent. Can imagine there is room for Amazon with its vast resources to have a decent chance to trial with perhaps some errors along the way but eventually refine a useful tool .

  15. DOA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just like their crappy phone...

    1. Re:DOA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And their crappy in house AMZN_US delivery service. There's at least 5000 complaints on Amazons customer discussion website about the losers hired to deliver Amazons packages with empty promises from Amazon.

  16. Tor Messenger Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Too many proprietary apps out there.

    I'd rather use the FOSS Tor Messenger Beta

    1. Re:Tor Messenger Beta by TWX · · Score: 1

      And for the 99% of people that don't use TOR?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Tor Messenger Beta by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      They can use ODN.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Tor Messenger Beta by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And for the 99% of people that don't use TOR?

      They can go to prison for copyright violation or thought crimes.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Tor Messenger Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for the 99% of people that don't use TOR?

      Use Tor.

  17. Data is the reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon probably has to do this because they need lots and lots of data for their future AI plans.

  18. Re:Prevention is the cure! by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    Perhaps something similar can be done to you. Considering 17% of posters are AC and are responsible for 90% of shitposts this is clearly a matter of public concern.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  19. My favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My favorite chat app is the one that lets me send real time voice, bidirectionally to everyone in the world -- it's called a telephone. You kids should try it once you are off my lawn. Seriously: How are messaging apps at all this important?

  20. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    it's called XMPP

    IRC doesn't suit the same purpose

  21. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    Looks like you didn't get my sarcasm.
    I just can't believe people are still using, and even worse, designing protocols based on phone numbers as an identifier.
    Offenders include iMessage, SMS, Whatsapp and many more crappy protocols designed to reach a SIM card instead of a person.

  22. FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    We are still getting fucking iframe banners with a static position at the top that covers 33% of our display.

    Slashdot is fucking broke, you annoy us with shit like this and you wonder why you are losing readers. Fucking imbeciles.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Have mod points, will post instead.
      Dude. Use Adblock. Seriously.

    2. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This. Slashdot is the only page out of the daily news that I CAN'T read while my laptop is in portrait mode. Seeing 3 words per line down the side followed by mostly empty space is a disgrace for a website targeted at nerds.

    3. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it so hard to switch on your adblocker?

    4. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Last time I tried it,, the damn thing used all the RAM it could and just made Safari even worst than Firefox.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are still getting fucking iframe banners with a static position at the top that covers 33% of our display.

      Slashdot is fucking broke, you annoy us with shit like this and you wonder why you are losing readers. Fucking imbeciles.

      This. I never meant to install an ad-blocker before, as advertisements are often the only source of income for 'free' sites. But then Slashdot completely broke the website by displaying ads over the content I wanted to read, and at the same time scrolling the content down a page in order to display the ad. I installed uBlock Origin *only* and *specifically* to get the Slashdot website back to functioning and usable again. Fucktards.

    6. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who like you were fed up, wnet here instead. Never looked back :D
      (I am on this thread due to search-engine result). Come on over, you'll love it :D

      Soylentnews.org

      _

    7. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep coming back, and somehow that is Slashdot's fault?

    8. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soylent News, the news site that will fuck over its original contributors just to get new eyeballs.

      Slashdot isn't run by fucktards like Soylent is. Even Pipedot is better.

    9. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Slashdot promised me that it would change! It's not my fault!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:FIX SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They promised to change.
      They didn't (according to your standards)
      You recognize their failure to change.
      You still keep coming back.

      Somehow that is Slashdot's fault?

  23. Facetwit by Zorro · · Score: 2

    Anything that takes down Facebook and Twitter is welcome.

    1. Re:Facetwit by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think it will?
      Even freakin' Google couldn't take down Facebook, and they own a large chunk of the internet.
      Amazon is really good at selling stuff but it is pretty much at level zero when it comes to social networking.

      It may have some success for customer service though.

  24. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    iMessage is NOT based on phone numbers but on Apple accounts. Otherwise how would people on Macs and iPods/iPads use it?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon: Try and stop us!

  26. Please don't by slashdice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Amazon's consumer facing software is awful. I assume they outsource it to the cheapest Indian body shop they can find.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  27. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so bad? It makes it backward-compatible with just about any mobile phone made in the last 20 years.

  28. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 2

    It's being used with limited functionality on these devices.
    Apple wants you to have an iPhone, and your phone number is your main identifier on iMessage, the one people are supposed to use when contacting you, even if the message also gets delivered to your Mac.

    Anyways, even without that huge flaw, iMessage still shouldn't be used as it's single-vendor. Who wants a single-vendor messaging protocol? Nobody only has friends with Apple devices.

  29. Re:Prevention is the cure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shutup nigger

  30. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    but incompatible with any internet-connected device made since... forever.
    The good way to be backward compatible with dumb phones is to provide SMS gateways, such as SMS to email. No reason why we couldn't make SMS to XMPP gateways. But those with Internet access on their phone (most people these days) shouldn't be stuck using SMS, and shouldn't have to suffer phone numbers as identifiers.

  31. Obvious Name by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
    FireChat

    Prediction: it will go down in flames.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Obvious Name by PPH · · Score: 1

      Heisenberg. They _may_ unveil it.

      Also, when it does come out, it will be about two orders of magnitude bigger than it needs to be.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  32. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I rather like Telegram's use of phone numbers to help add people to your contacts list.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  33. Open standard by tsa · · Score: 1

    It's time for the EU to mandate an open standard for messaging apps so you can choose the one you like and not the one most of your friends use.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Open standard by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      you mean mandating XMPP?

  34. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    It could be used as an optional, secondary way of adding someone to your list (just like searching by name and city). But it should never be the primary ID. That's just plain stupid. People can have more than one phone, many people can share a phone number, phone numbers are country based, sometimes you can't even keep it when switching provider within the same country. They are also hard to remember. But the main reason is that most internet connected devices don't have a phone number. Telegram sucks so much that you can't use it on a PC unless you also have a cell phone. They do have a desktop web client, but here is what happens when you try to login, you get the following error message:

    sign up with Android / iPhone first

    which is a truly ugly, artificial limitation

  35. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    My parents share an email address, so I'd argue that email addresses aren't a great way to identify people either. (or that my parents have a weird policy)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  36. Re:Prevention is the cure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps something similar can be done to you. Considering 17% of posters are AC and are responsible for 90% of shitposts this is clearly a matter of public concern.

    Difference is, as a white person I only had the number of children I could personally afford. I had them AFTER obtaining an education and establishing a good career. I never took a penny of welfare money. Unlike the morbidly obese black women I see every day every single time I drive through the city on my commute.

    Considering that black males are just over 7% yet account for over 50% of all solved murder cases, and primarily murder other black males, it's remarkable that there remains a black gene pool at all! That means they breed at what should be an exceedingly excessive rate. I guess that's easy when you don't have to worry about mundane concerns like how the hell to pay for all those bastard kids! This is what welfare culture is giving to us. Not a safety net.

    Hell with contraceptive darts. Here's a solution: if you want welfare, sure, we'll give you plenty! But, you must agree to surgical sterilization. That's a vascectomy for the very few men who take welfare (remember, WIC = Women Infants and Children), and tubes ties for the women who take welfare. Later, if/when you somehow get back on your feet (haha!), well, children are fucking expensive. If you can afford to reverse the procedure out of your own pocket, then clearly you can also afford children. Then everybody is happy.

  37. Re:Prevention is the cure! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Perhaps something similar can be done to you. Considering 17% of posters are AC and are responsible for 90% of shitposts this is clearly a matter of public concern.

    Difference is, as a white person I only had the number of children I could personally afford. I had them AFTER obtaining an education and establishing a good career. I never took a penny of welfare money. Unlike the morbidly obese black women I see every day every single time I drive through the city on my commute.

    Considering that black males are just over 7% yet account for over 50% of all solved murder cases, and primarily murder other black males, it's remarkable that there remains a black gene pool at all! That means they breed at what should be an exceedingly excessive rate. I guess that's easy when you don't have to worry about mundane concerns like how the hell to pay for all those bastard kids! This is what welfare culture is giving to us. Not a safety net.

    Hell with contraceptive darts. Here's a solution: if you want welfare, sure, we'll give you plenty! But, you must agree to surgical sterilization. That's a vascectomy for the very few men who take welfare (remember, WIC = Women Infants and Children), and tubes ties for the women who take welfare. Later, if/when you somehow get back on your feet (haha!), well, children are fucking expensive. If you can afford to reverse the procedure out of your own pocket, then clearly you can also afford children. Then everybody is happy.

    Well, that certainly is a problem. Maybe you could take them all into custody and make them work for free or something.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  38. Re:no WhatsApp-style dependence on phone numbers h by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    At least with email your parents could create a second one for free if they wanted to. To get a phone number, you must usually pay.