Slashdot Mirror


US To Create the Independent US Cyber Command, Split Off From NSA (pbs.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from PBS: After months of delay, the Trump administration is finalizing plans to revamp the nation's military command for defensive and offensive cyber operations in hopes of intensifying America's ability to wage cyberwar against the Islamic State group and other foes, according to U.S. officials. Under the plans, U.S. Cyber Command would eventually be split off from the intelligence-focused National Security Agency. The goal, they said, is to give U.S. Cyber Command more autonomy, freeing it from any constraints that stem from working alongside the NSA, which is responsible for monitoring and collecting telephone, internet and other intelligence data from around the world -- a responsibility that can sometimes clash with military operations against enemy forces. Making cyber an independent military command will put the fight in digital space on the same footing as more traditional realms of battle on land, in the air, at sea and in space. The move reflects the escalating threat of cyberattacks and intrusions from other nation states, terrorist groups and hackers, and comes as the U.S. faces ever-widening fears about Russian hacking following Moscow's efforts to meddle in the 2016 American election.

104 comments

  1. Old news. by will_die · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was actually something that was started at the end of last year by Obama, and has been needed for a very long time. It has just taken this long for the meetings and paperwork to be completed.

    1. Re:Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important thing is that it has "cyber" in the name... that's not gay all!

    2. Re:Old news. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Now Donald has a real department to refer to when he goes around talking about "the cyber".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Old news. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      It has just taken this long for the meetings and paperwork to be completed.

      So now its something that is actually going to happen and therefor news, right?

    4. Re:Old news. by will_die · · Score: 1

      No it is still in talks and in a couple of months from now might actually happen. Then it will be news.

    5. Re: Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche. (It's a shame the touche mod doesn't exist on this site).

  2. Help Wanted by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Russian language skills definitely a plus.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "freeing it from any constraints that stem from working alongside the NSA"

    Given everything we know now, what possible constraints can the NSA be working under? Possibly "Do not wake the Elders Ones.", but other than that, what?

    1. Re:WTF?!? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the head of the NSA refused to pledge loyalty to our current President, so...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:WTF?!? by youngone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the head of the NSA refused to pledge loyalty to our current President, so...

      Which is a good thing, in the US no-one ever pledges loyalty to any individual. They might make a pledge to uphold the Constitution, but as far as I can tell the current President is the first to need personal loyalty from his officeholders.

    3. Re:WTF?!? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Which is a good thing, in the US no-one ever pledges loyalty to any individual.

      I completely agree with you. I was pointing it out because it's only recently become an alleged issue.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:WTF?!? by quenda · · Score: 2

      It means there are some things even the NSA will not do.
      So they want a new group combining the tech skills of the NSA with the morals of the CIA.

    5. Re:WTF?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

      ...it's only recently become an alleged issue...

      Not a huge surprise though.

    6. Re:WTF?!? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      You sad motherfucker. You signed a non-disparagement agreement when you voted for Trump.

      Pay $5 million now.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in the US no-one ever pledges loyalty to any individual.

      Unless you're a GOP Congressperson and you want some of Grover Norquist's money
      Then you pledge fealty and do as you are told
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/13/nearly-all-the-gop-candidates-bow-down-to-grover-norquist/?utm_term=.62e6c72ca7d3

    8. Re:WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current President is also possibly the first to be so firmly opposed by the unelected officials that constitute the Deep State. So I can see why he wants personal loyalty.

      He still shouldn't get it, of course, but I can see why he wants it.

    9. Re: WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the last president left his minions in to disrupt and slow progress if the current administration.

    10. Re: WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because bush left his minions....

      Shit's getting old man. We can take this all the way back to George Washington and John Adams for Christ sakes.

    11. Re:WTF?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry. A cheque is on it's way.

    12. Re:WTF?!? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Ty, neighbour.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  4. I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd be more worried about things like the OPM hack (which occurred during Obama's reign of neglect) than I would about the widely debunked claims of Russian "hacking" the US election.

    There has long been a need to set up a "cyber command" with the authority to force US Government agencies to upgrade their IT systems and security. It has nothing to do with the fake "Russian hacking" news.

    1. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed, comrade

    2. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Widely debunked" by whom? We know the Russians did manage to break into some election systems in some states. We know that artfully timed email leaks probably had a significant effect on the election results, and we've seen the Russians trying similar stunts with recent European elections.

      Just claiming "it's debunked" doesn't make the claims of Russian interference false. All it says is that you have willfully bought into a false narrative, and I'd be curious as to why you have bought into that narrative, considering we now know of at least three recent elections where the Russians were intentionally trying to give their preferred candidate the advantage.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re: I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you make shit up in your mouth like that, does it taste like Putin's asshole? You would know, wouldn't you?

    4. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OPM hack was by Chinese

    5. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has long been a need to set up a "cyber command" with the authority to force US Government agencies to upgrade their IT systems and security.

      Indeed. Good thing Obama's people got the ball rolling on this.

    6. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Widely debunked" by LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I can't hear you!
      #MAGA

    7. Re: I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry somewhere else snowflake

    8. Re: I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, he's still busy swirling Donald's balls with his tongue, because Donald's penis doesn't come close to filling his mouth.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Widely debunked" by whom? We know the Russians did manage to break into some election systems in some states. We know that artfully timed email leaks probably had a significant effect on the election results, and we've seen the Russians trying similar stunts with recent European elections.

      Please show me ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE showing the Russians were involved in hacking. JUST ONE PIECE. Dude I work in information security and have read all the reports put out and there is not one bit of hard evidence to support this. A lot of "We assess" but no factual evidence. Actually the evidence supports an inside job especially is you consider the propaganda put out about all this.

      The only attempts on hacking the election with hard evidence to supprt the hack is the fact the DHS attempted to hack 9 states network without permission but nobody is talking about that. Hell DHS was so stupid the forgot the first rule of hacking "never hack from home" the hacks came from an IP leased by the DHS.

      This Russian hacking scam is the biggest lie fed to the US people ever and here you are carrying that lie. Best to ask what is this smoke screen really covering up. Dude it is you who have willfully bought into a false narrative and drank the kool-aide like a good comrade.

      All this and people like you make me sick with you lies and propaganda.

      The truth is we do not want to get into a cyber war with Russia we will get our asses throughly kicked.

      I do pen testing in both the US and Russia and let me tell you the Russians have their act together with REAL engineers and real security. Internet security with most please here in the US is a joke. The reason here in the US the bean counters run the network in Russia real engineers run things and do a fine job of it.

      We know that artfully timed email leaks probably had a significant effect on the election results,

      Timing doesn't matter and people do not look at the facts that serious crimes were commited by our leaders and they walk around free as the wind. Ms. Winner leaks ONE email and is put on the cross yet Hillary leaked over 30,000 and walked and it is said this wasn't a big deal and this isn't including that these emails is solid evidence of her accepting money for favors. "Pay to Play" is suppse to be illegal.

      I'm old enough to remember when Russia was a real bad guy these days it seems we have swapped places we are now the leaders is lies, and propaganda.

      Please go back to Mars and don't spread you BS here.

    10. Re:I'd be worried more about the OPM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Idiot, try getting an American-made spell checker next time you try this shit. "Comrade".

  5. Like some goddam hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go RoboTrump, Golden King of the Cyber.

  6. So would this make them limited by posse comitatus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

  7. What constraints? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When has the NSA stayed inside bounds that the country would require an agency acting outside of?

    What do they need done that apparently not even the sickos at Camp X-Ray were willing to do for them?

  8. Like the NSA didn't have enough atonomy... by evolutionary · · Score: 0

    okay, the NSA violates the constitution against it's own citizens, as well as routinely breaks any number of laws, and they need MORE?!? The last thing any government department is less oversight. This sounds like someone attempt to get more data to somewhere in a space people like high lever officials (say Senators for example) are less likely (or able) to check up on things. Would be a lot easier to pipe data to..say..Russia.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Like the NSA didn't have enough atonomy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Would be a lot easier to pipe data to..say...
      OURSELVES

      No need to even add conspiracy to the situation, it is bizarre enough that the data be stored even locally..

    2. Re:Like the NSA didn't have enough atonomy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, the NSA violates the constitution against it's own citizens, as well as routinely breaks any number of laws, and they need MORE?!? The last thing any government department is less oversight. This sounds like someone attempt to get more data to somewhere in a space people like high lever officials (say Senators for example) are less likely (or able) to check up on things. Would be a lot easier to pipe data to..say..Russia.

      Well, you routinely break any number of basic grammar rules...

  9. Pocket protectors? by Major_Disorder · · Score: 1

    Is a pocket protector part of the uniform?

    --
    First law of people: People are generally stupid.
  10. Fantastic news by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The goal, they said, is to give U.S. Cyber Command more autonomy, freeing it from any constraints that stem from working alongside the NSA...

    [sarcasm] Great... A government agency with less accountability than the NSA. Just what we all needed more of. [/sarcasm]

    1. Re:Fantastic news by ir0nHat · · Score: 1

      Yahoo Serious. .... Albert naively replies “If you can't trust the governments of the world, then who can you trust?

    2. Re:Fantastic news by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Posting to undo mod.

  11. Rubbish! by bwanagary · · Score: 1, Troll

    "... following Moscow's efforts to meddle in the 2016 American election." Rubbish!

    This is not news, or even fact. You are parroting and perpetuating misinformation. After significant effort and expense and, oh, over six months of exhaustive digging, zero evidence can be produced to support this statement. If you're just going to parrot CNN or some other ratings-focused "news" rag, then I can just go there instead of slashdot when I want to be mislead. Seriously, for all the good work you publish here, this kind of drivil really doesn't do you justice and only serves to diminish the credibility of your other posts. You do yourself a grave injustice and insult the intelligence of the slashdot reader. Spare us the thinly disguised and feeble attempt at political commentary.

    1. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Putin shill.

      (And it's "drivel", BTW.)

    2. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Faggot, learn to read. All US intel agencies agree, Russia attempted to hack and undermine US elections directly in dozens and hundreds of ways.

      You're a fucking pseudo-illiterate in defense of a moronic ponzi schemer and traitor. Fuck you, non-American punk ass.

    3. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to prove him wrong?

    4. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US intel agencies already did, you fucking morons. Trump Jr. also did himself when he released emails that said so verbatim, fucking illiterate Trumpy bitches.

      See you at the firing squad! Too bad we can't get the entire treasonous GOP at once. If Trump had any sense he'd resign now and move to St. Petersburg until that retarded and sleepless faggot dies of senility.

    5. Re:Rubbish! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Found the Putin shill.

      While I completely disagree with the guy, I seriously do appreciate that he posted his opinion under his Slashdot username. There's way too much anonymous shilling (from all sides) happening on Slashdot nowadays.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Rubbish! by z3alot · · Score: 2

      Do you have a reason to distrust all of our intelligence services?

    7. Re:Rubbish! by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 1

      You are parroting and perpetuating misinformation.

      Well you are probably a perjuring prevaricator, Pashenka.

      Really, you do yourself a grave injustice and insult the intelligence of slashdot readers by driveling opinions without a basis of fact.

      Eg, you claim there is "zero evidence" to support "Moscow's efforts to meddle in the 2016 American election." Lol, just lol. You made your point without any evidence either, but I'll ignore that (this one time) and respond anyway: http://www.businessinsider.com... https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      At this point, there's just a huge mountain of evidence. To make a claim like "there's no evidence" is obviously a troll/shill, but I just had to respond because your alliteration made me laugh, you sounded so serious, heh, I'm still chuckling.

    8. Re:Rubbish! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh for fuck's sake, that's a load of shit. Several officials have stated Russia was making overt efforts to influence the election, and we now have no less than the President's eldest son releasing emails showing he (quite gleefully) went to a meeting with some Russians, believing he was going to receive damaging materials against Clinton. Furthermore, as I say above, the Russians have been implicated in attempting to interfere in recent European elections.

      You may choose to not believe what various members of the US and other intelligence communities are saying, but your proclamation of "zero evidence" is pure bunk. The Russians are not our friends, they remain significant enemies of the West.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Rubbish! by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Informative

      AC the "Julian Assange: 'A lot more material' coming on US elections" (July 27, 2016)
      ""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces. But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are,""
      http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07...
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... (15 December 2016)
      "they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers"
      AC its more like the Pentagon Papers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... all over again. US domestic politics.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Putin shill.

      While I completely disagree with the guy, I seriously do appreciate that he posted his opinion under his Slashdot username. There's way too much anonymous shilling (from all sides) happening on Slashdot nowadays.

      Still, Mr. Ford, he posted anonymously, as he should.

    11. Re:Rubbish! by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      The word "treason" is not useful in this context.

      No United States citizen is declaring war on the United States. The last time that happened was the Civil War.

      The United States does not have a list of enemies. The last time that happened was WWII.

      --

      U.S. Constitution Article III Section 3.

      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort . No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

      The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    12. Re:Rubbish! by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      News stories are not evidence bubalah. Evidence is evidence, after all the lies put out by US mainstream media to have the dear leader Clinton the corporate whore elected, the drivel coming out now is just stupid, so butt hurt about Don Don winning. On one side the trillion dollar entirety of main stream media, probably something like 200,000 agents of various stripes and colours NSA/CIA/FBI oh wait there are 16 of them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (screw typing all that out) and now tadah 17 and a huge amount contracted out and out sourced. Not too mention extreme experience at hacking other countries elections including extortion of politicians and media personalities and Russia and RT fucked them over, what a crock of shit.

      The current round of bullshit is only about one thing, keeping the gullible American worker subserviant, oh no, American workers can not win elections, you have no power, shut the fuck up, go crawl in the dark, obey your main stream media masters again. Well, you lost the American elections because American workers stopped fucking listening to American Main Stream media and that is it, nothing more and nothing less but the establishment will not dare to admit to American workers they have power over government, as they just demonstrated. So the message from the establishment to the American worker, listen you pathetic sacks of shit, you deplorables, you would never have won without Russian government collusion, so forget about the next election but they wont forget, they have tasted their power and they will not give it back so lightly.

      As for those listed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., you are all pathetic sacks of shite, look how the Russians and RT fucked you all over and you with 100 times maybe even 1,000 times the budget of Russia, well at least that's what the Democrats and US Main Stream Media are saying about you. Personally apart from some extremely corrupt political appointees and their crew of the corrupt, the rest seem skilled and quite capable of fending off any Foreign incursions, when they are allowed to ie the mass rape of US elections by the Israeli government.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    13. Re:Rubbish! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      we now have no less than the President's eldest son releasing emails showing he (quite gleefully) went to a meeting with some Russians

      This is a classic set up for creating some damaging stories about someone that you can later leak. The managed to put a weak and ineffective government in office, and seem to have plenty of material to keep drip feeding out to make sure that it stays unstable indefinitely.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is 93 Escort Wagon less anonymous? Post under your real name if you want to uphold that virtue.

  12. That's fix everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reorganizing it from a secretive federal agency to a secretive military subdivision should be all that's needed to fix all our problems.

    The average NSA employee is much brighter than the average military employee.

    1. Re:That's fix everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the average NSA employee is a contractor these days because of this retarded idea that long contractors are somehow cheaper than paying for health insurance and 401k. What you also lose is people that are working for the NSA out of patriotism vs people in it for the money/prestige.

  13. new CBS TV show by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Cyber Show, Idiot

  14. Reminds me of Kobe Bryant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when, after some particularly unsavory sexual assault charges, changed his jersey number in some apparent attempt to rebuild his image?

    Or, as Daniel Tosh put it, "Hey, hey, hey - let's be fair. Number 8 was the rapist."

  15. Tired of this subject... by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    It's questionable the Russians did anything. What was done could have been done by a handful of 15 yearolds. The real story in all this is the people in positions of power that we trust to run government don't have a clue about security and don't take it seriously enough. Lax security.

    Stop blaming others when your using the equivalent of Roman locks and wax seals for security.

    1. Re:Tired of this subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's questionable the Russians did anything." You're a lying faggot.

    2. Re:Tired of this subject... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "It's questionable the Russians did anything."

      By any reasonable definition of "questionable" it is absolutely not questionable. Emails from russians admit to it.

      "What was done could have been done by a handful of 15 yearolds."

      Arranging to meet with Trump family and campaign representatives to discuss information obtained via espionage, and to hold that meeting, is not something that can be done "by a handful of 15 year olds". Since what other things might have been done are not public knowledge, no one in the public sphere could possibly know the extent of what was done or the skill and access needed to do it.

      "The real story in all this is the people in positions of power that we trust to run government don't have a clue about security and don't take it seriously enough. Lax security."

      Whether or not that is a story, it is not the "real story".

      "Stop blaming others when your using the equivalent of Roman locks and wax seals for security."

      Who is blaming others? This is your straw man, not someone else's failure.

      Nice try, BlueCoder.

  16. The Last Thing We Need... by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    There are too many intelligence agencies in the US. If politicians were serious about eliminating government waste, they would consolidate all of those agencies into one, Central Intelligence Agency.

    Having a bunch of isolated intelligence gathering agencies is how we ended up with Pearl Harbor, and 9/11.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:The Last Thing We Need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could call this new mega agency the Federal Super Bureau. MAGA with the FSB!

    2. Re:The Last Thing We Need... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Pearl Harbor was not a mistake. The information was withheld on purpose to provide motivation/impetus/excuse to enter the war in an unbridled way. Don't believe me? Do some research, it's not a theory held by the tin-foil crowd, it is a view supported by the evidence and now more and more historians believe that to be the case.

      Will 9/11 be seen in the same way in 50 years? Worse, maybe as a false flag operation? Guess we'll have to wait and see.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    3. Re:The Last Thing We Need... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
      I trust Wikipedia :-)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_conspiracy_theory

      However, the Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy is considered to be a fringe theory and is rejected by most historians.[11][12][13]

      tl;dr

    4. Re:The Last Thing We Need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are too many intelligence agencies in the US.

      I don't think the intention is that this would be primarily an intelligence agency. It's a military organization, they are going to attack and defend, just like the army does.

    5. Re:The Last Thing We Need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pearl Harbor was not a mistake. The information was withheld on purpose to provide motivation/impetus/excuse to enter the war in an unbridled way. Don't believe me? Do some research, it's not a theory held by the tin-foil crowd, it is a view supported by the evidence and now more and more historians believe that to be the case.

      False. All the evidence indicates that FDR did not want a war with Japan. He was interested in fighting Germany. The German-Japanese alliance was defensive. It was pure dumb luck that Hitler declared war on the United States after the Japanese attack - certainly not something that any rational person would have expected.

      The fleet at Pearl Harbour was operating under the assumption that air dropped torpedoes (the major threat to ships) could not be used in the shallow water of the harbour. That was true for US torpedoes - but the Japanese had solved that problem (just one of several ways in which the Japanese were ahead of the rest of the world in terms of technology). This failed assumption was the key, because it affected the thinking of all the key people involved - they believed that their ships would be far more resistant to attack than proved to be the case, and thus were far less concerned about the possibility of attack.

      Pearl Harbour was no different from any other intelligence failure - of which there were a great many in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam. Look at the battle of Savo Island for a classic example.

      The attack on Pearl Harbour was however, a huge mistake - but the big mistake was on the part of the Japanese. They made a tactically brilliant attack that was a complete disaster from a strategic perspective. The Japanese failed to destroy the oil tanks that provided fuel for the Pacific fleet - the most important target on the islands - and the failure to this was one of the biggest intelligence failures associated with the attack. They also failed to realize how effective the US repair capabilities were - most of the sunken ships were raised, repaired, and given long overdue refits. Combined with transfers from the Atlantic fleet, within 9-12 months the US battleship force in the Pacific was stronger than it had been at the time of the attack (though critically short on tankers, thanks to the German U-Boats sinking so many in the Atlantic - those old battleships required enormous amounts of fuel). Finally, the Japanese failed to realize the effect the attack would have on public opinion, creating an enormous long term morale effect to help sustain the war (and improve productivity).

  17. Armaments required by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    So we are definitely going to need the Gun Emoji , perhaps a missile and nuke Emoji too.
    Perhaps a gravestone Emoji with "Byte the Dust" would be appropriate too.

  18. "The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough" by DogDude · · Score: 1

    "As far as the cyber, I agree to parts of what Secretary Clinton said. We should be better than anybody else, and perhaps we’re not. I don’t think anybody knows that it was Russia that broke into the DNC. She’s saying Russia, Russia, Russia—I don't, maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, okay?
    ...
    We came in with the Internet. We came up with the Internet. And I think Secretary Clinton and myself would agree very much, when you look at what ISIS is doing with the Internet, they’re beating us at our own game. ISIS.

    So we had to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is a huge problem. I have a son—he’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers. It’s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough. And maybe, it's hardly doable. But I will say, we are not doing the job we should be doing. But that’s true throughout our whole governmental society. We have so many things that we have to do better, Lester. And certainly cyber is one of them."

    I for one, am relieved that we have this person making the tough decisions. He'll fix everything with cyber.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  19. A Law banning cyber attacks against US Persons by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    We need to be protected from this. Cybercommand *Is* a good idea, but let us set it up so 1st it does US no harm.

    1. Re:A Law banning cyber attacks against US Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really possible. Any counter attack will carry with it a lot of collateral damage. As long as we're honest about it and are prepared to deal with the fall-out. Once you go on the offense you have to expect a lot of people to counter you. That is a dramatic escalation and will likely make the Internet as an internal communications medium unusable. We'll be back in the dark ages relying on Internet 2 which once again has only universities and other research institutes connected to it.

      The problem of DDoS will be an increasing issue until we migrate to ipv6 and eliminate privacy which is the inevitable next steps.

      If their goal was to just identity people and work with authorities in native countries then all will be well, that is not what this sounds like though as the FBI already does this.

    2. Re:A Law banning cyber attacks against US Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a dramatic escalation and will likely make the Internet as an internal communications medium unusable. We'll be back in the dark ages relying on Internet 2 which once again has only universities and other research institutes connected to it.

      Yes! Eternal September will finally end!

  20. This is actually a positive development by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, spinning it off into a new branch of the military is a GOOD thing for American civilians. Why? The military operates under constraints, scrutiny, and civilian oversight that increasingly seem to NOT apply to "mere" law enforcement agencies (especially post-9/11).

  21. So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA will now be broken into 2 agencies:
    The first will hoard exploits, subvert our cryptography, writing malware and make all electronic communications less secure to spy on bad guys...
    and
    The second will hoard exploits, subvert our cryptography, writing malware, and make all electronic communications less secure to attack the bad guys?

    This is not what many of us had in mind when suggesting to break up the NSA into offensive and defensive roles. The hope was to have one agency undo the messes caused by the other, but instead we now have 2 groups assaulting our liberties instead of one! Just fucking wonderful.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Rather than have one group that has to be the sword and the shield both trying to keep codes safe and break encryption.
      Think of it as a new cyber CIA that can support freedom fighters all over the globe.
      Free of any 1970's FISA oversight and budget questions.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:So let me get this straight... by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 1

      Hrm. I'm all for fighting our adversaries, and at least perceptionally, Russia seems to be getting our goat & Isis is doing better than they should. But, I also hope we're doing this right. Anything Trump touches ends up being horribly planned and rushed, bad for common American public, horribly implemented, and eventually all the details get leaked by back-stabbing political underlings. I see Ash Carter and Obama started the Command, and Mattis is pushing it now, so I have hope. And the only thing Trump should do is sign on the dotted line w/out saying a word. I'd like to know the details that have been negotiated recently - at least that they don't unnecessarily intrude on friendly common people's privacy and other rights. And to parent's point - how exactly do military operation rules have more constraints & scrutiny than law enforcement agencies?

  22. Re:"The security aspect of cyber is very, very tou by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 1

    He'll fix everything with THE cyber.

    FTFY

  23. "Putin & I... impenetrable Cyber Security unit by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    That sounds like what he discussed with Putin:

    "Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded."

    Donald Trump, July 9th, 2017
    https://twitter.com/realDonald...

    The next day he said tweeted "The fact that President Putin and I discussed a Cyber Security unit doesn't mean I think it can happen. It can't..." But maybe it can. Perhaps Putin's role in it is one of the "Details [that] are still being worked out, but officials say they expect a decision and announcement in the coming weeks."

  24. Re:"The security aspect of cyber is very, very tou by losfromla · · Score: 0

    I don't put much faith in the 1337 skilz of a 400 pound whale. People like that are generally not very motivated and as evidenced by their obesity, not very intelligent.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  25. Re:LMAO @ U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it not the least bit surprising that Alexander Peter Kowalski is a Trump supporter?

  26. Re:"Putin & I... impenetrable Cyber Security u by will_die · · Score: 1

    You mean the one on March 26 when Putin was told that he would do more what Putin after the next election?

  27. I'm like Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    APK's work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error &/or bad advice by BlueStrat

    * My code's recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject: I get things done PEOPLE LIKE (as does Trump) & I've proof unlike "your kind" in do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" UNIDENTIFIABLY talkers per quoted /.ers above (want more? ask & "ye shall receive" + I've got dozens more like 'em) + highly esteemed malwarebytes too (how about you?)... apk

  28. A Blessing In Desguise For NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great!

    Now NSA can offload about 2 million Queers, Transvestites, Gays and Lesbians to the new "Command"! Better bring an "aqualung" on the tour of the New Cyber Command Basement Holding Pen!

    There are 2 million inmates, stashed away in Tank C, and and there's only one shower, and it don't apply to Bobby!

    You may think that they are dumb and lonely, but U are wrong cause their love is STONG.

    Stacked-up hair, And a cheap little ring, They don't care 'Cause it don't mean a thing!

    Looky Dare!

    Dey Don't Care!

    [Thanks to Frank Zappa.]

    Ha ha

  29. More than a few, yes... by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Usually the question goes the other way: do you have a reason to *trust* them. Anyhow, there are a few things that make me question them, yes.

    They've helped destabilize or backed coups in Iran, Guatemala, North Vietnam, Hungary, Laos, Haiti, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Zaire, Brazil, Indonesia, Greece, Bolivia, Cambodia, Chile, Afghanistan, and probably other places. They've run operations like Operation Mockingbird, they helped with Watergate, etc.

    The current operation is about like the lies over the WMD. Secret evidence, tons of stories with nothing in them but anonymous quotes.

    And even the ODNI report you allude to is getting inflated. It merely said that hacking the election was something Russia might like to do, it didn't give any actual evidence if you read the damned thing. But what the heck does the Coast Guard know about this, anyhow? Oh, right, you probably didn't know who the members of that were. Or that the people who signed this report were just a couple of political appointees.

    Same way you guys probably never read the Trend Micro report which everyone talked about and I think only Ars actually bothered to link to.

    But sure, please feel free to show me the 'mountain of evidence' of CNN/WaPo stories that all cite each other, anonymous/secret sources, or the ODNI, Crowdstrike or Trend Micro reports that have jack all in them but an old copy of P.A.S. freeware and some Tor exit nodes. But hey, that Advanced Persistent Threat Fancy Bear is everywhere.

  30. ... will put the fight in digital space ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... on the same footing as more traditional realms of battle on land, in the air, at sea and in space ...

    Which America is losing, bigly.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  31. Re:LMAO @ U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're a moron APK. Trump is a traitor and that has NOTHING to do with welfare, food stamps, education/healthcare cuts or anything else.

    Stop being Putin's bitch you cunt.

  32. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another agency

  33. /.ers quoted disagree unidentifiable troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat

    * My code's recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject: Trump's done a decent job even early in (for no presidential pay). I'm not complaining. You are... apk

  34. Perpetuating the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on everything is big business.

  35. Still a terrorist org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA (and NSA) is imo still a terrorist org, despite trying to make NSA look more "defensive" and more like the "good guys". This idea of wanting to say that they should separate NSA from US cyber command is (at least) a few years old now, and I remember it first as an accusation of my own, and as I remember it, then as a suggestion by a prominent technologist now working for US congress.

    Btw, their DoD, or Department of Defense used to be called "Department of War" for the longest time, and up til 1947 according to Wikipedia. 1947 was sort of right around the corner after the terror bombing of Hirshima and Nagasaki in WW2.

    The government of USA has ZERO credibility with me, and anyone that thinks that NSA has a 'responsibility' to perform espionage against anyone on planet Earth, is imo either a national extremist, and also something of a fascist if also arguing that USA really is the leader of the so called free world as a matter of fact, as if insisting on having me believe in that to be true.

  36. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the 14th or 15th intelligence agency for the U.S.? Just another group to hunt for something they can only conveniently identify and be both judge, jury, and executioner. Just be sure to use whatever the current "pop-terror culture" is using, aka whatever you guys decide to whisper in the media's ear to get the most attention. You know how you combat cyber "terrorism?" Invent a time machine and smack every lazy asshole that wanted to go paperless or thought Window$ in a government setting was a good idea. Actually, that's too easy. I say we send back the YouTube girl with the desert eagle and few thick dictionaries. Then again, what happens when two people of equal minor intelligence meet face to face? Usually, nothing good.

  37. Naming Conventions by necro81 · · Score: 1
    I know that language is fluid, evolves, words-are-just-metaphores-for-abstract-impressions-in-the-brain, and other PhD-level obfuscations, but...

    Making cyber an independent military command will...

    For Fuck's Sake: "cyber" is a prefix, it is not a noun all on its own!

    I think the first time I heard it used that way was by - no surprise here - then-candidate Donald Trump during a debate. And, as you can hear in that clip, using "cyber" as a noun sounds about as coherent as saying the internet is a series of tubes. Perhaps people have been misusing "cyber" all this time, and I'm only just now noticing. Maybe that moment of idiocy, broadcast to the whole world, just heightened my senses to it, but now I seem to read and hear it all the time. I prefer to think that stupidity is contagious, and Donald Trump is just an index patient.

    1. Re:Naming Conventions by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      "Cyber" is a noun on its own -- it means online (that is, simulated and manually performed) sex. This entered Urban Dictionary over a decade ago, and it wasn't new then. If you think of it this way, it will make blowhard politicos much funnier.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  38. LMAO @ U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your 'officials' had anything as proof of "russian hacking" etc. they'd have it out RIGHT NOW immediately. They have zero & Trump's kid != Trump either & doing opposition research is a norm & she approached HIM first (& he didn't even discuss Hillary w/ her (he knew it was a deceitful setup attempt).

    * Seeing as you HAD to unjustifiably downmod last time I posted that common-sense above PROVES you had nothing valid to disprove it as well https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10874561&cid=54829653/

    APK

    P.S.=> Go away fool... apk

  39. Re:LMAO @ U by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

    It took two years to bring Nixon down. I'm curious as to why you think the timelines should be shorter for Trump. Adults have patience, children do not.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  40. Where is the proof on Russia/Trump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Where's proof of Trump being a "russian operative" or Russians hacking the vote? It's not. Period...

    * Until someone can turn that up (better than CNN's own in Producer John Bonnifield even saying "the russian narrative is bullshit" & Van Jones even said the russian narrative is a "big nothing burger"...), you LOSE...

    APK

    P.S.=> Long & short of it - I wasn't nuts about Obama OR Bush but I knew they were our Presidents, so don't "put down your own" & deal w/ them UNTIL they are shown majorly "f'ing up" (then help correct that too if possible)... apk

  41. 2 yrs. bullshitter? BS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    November 17, 1973: Nixon delivers "I am not a crook" speech at a televised press conference at Disney World (Florida).
    November 27, 1973: the Senate votes 92 to 3 to confirm Ford as Vice President.
    December 6, 1973: the House votes 387 to 35 to confirm Ford as Vice President, and he takes the oath of office an hour after the vote.
    January 28, 1974: Nixon campaign aide Herbert Porter pleads guilty to perjury.
    February 25, 1974: Nixon personal counsel Herbert Kalmbach pleads guilty to two charges of illegal campaign activities.
    March 1, 1974: Nixon is named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an indictment against seven former presidential aides.
    March 4, 1974: the "Watergate Seven" (Mitchell, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Colson, Gordon C. Strachan, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson) are indicted.
    April 5, 1974: Dwight Chapin convicted of lying to a grand jury.
    April 7, 1974: Ed Reinecke, Republican lieutenant governor of California, indicted on three charges of perjury before the Senate committee.
    April 16, 1974: Special Prosecutor Jaworski issues a subpoena for 64 White House tapes.
    April 30, 1974: White House releases edited transcripts of the Nixon tapes, but the House Judiciary Committee insists the actual tapes must be turned over.
    May 9, 1974: Impeachment hearings begin before the House Judiciary Committee.
    June 15, 1974: Woodward and Bernstein's book All the President's Men is published by Simon & Schuster (ISBN 0-671-21781-X).
    July 24, 1974: United States v. Nixon decided: Nixon is ordered to give up tapes to investigators.
    Congress moves to impeach Nixon.
    July 27 to July 30, 1974: House Judiciary Committee passes Articles of Impeachment.
    Early August 1974: A previously unknown tape from June 23, 1972 (recorded a few days after the break-in) documenting Nixon and Haldeman formulating a plan to block investigations is released. This recording later became known as the "Smoking Gun".
    Key Republican Senators tell Nixon that enough votes exist to convict him.
    August 8, 1974: Nixon delivers his resignation speech in front of a nationally televised audience.
    August 9, 1974: Nixon resigns from office. Gerald Ford becomes president.

    * THAT's NOT 2 YRS. YOU EXAGGERATING LIAR!

    (It was only a matter of 9 months...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - Now, go back to Canada you BLATANTLY TRANSPARENT SOROS EMPLOYEE... apk

  42. Serious Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much of what you state is true, however the reference to WMD is not true.

    The intelligence on WMD was accurate, professional, and appropriately skeptical. It was GWB's team that rushed to judgment and pushed the narrative of WMD.

    Blame Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld if you wish, that would be accurate. Hell, include Powell and Rice if you feel the need. They all wanted to believe the WMDs existed and they slandered Hans Blix, who turned out to be the only genuinely reliable source of information on the matter.

    The CIA, NSA and all the rest were pretty clean on the WMD score. They warned the Cabinet that Curveball was a single source and potentially unreliable, among other things.

    I realize that in the current "invent your own facts" environment this might not be popular. Then again I was never one for the current fashion.

    1. Re:Serious Error by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      > The intelligence on WMD was accurate, professional, and appropriately skeptical. It was GWB's team that rushed to judgment and pushed the narrative of WMD.

      That's the trick, though. The ODNI report isn't so bad... it just doesn't actually say anything, nobody actually read it, and stories very rarely ever bother to link to it. It's the rest of the people all pushing stories about how 17 agencies say Russia hacked the election (something NOT in the damned report!).

      FWIW, I don't seriously believe they "rushed to judgement" either. From what I can tell, they had an answer they wanted and they looked for any justification, however flimsy, to support that. This is the same thing you see with the Russia story today, where they push utter crap like the "Trump server secretly communicating with Russian bank!" story. Which, when you actually investigated, turned out to be a 3rd party marketing server associated with some Trump business making DNS queries due to Russian phishing scams against said bank. The real story there would be "who is spying on their DNS traffic?" but you won't find any stories in the media about that because few people ever read more than the headline of that story.

      The media was actually against the GWB regime (for good reason, it turned out) so you heard more of the dissenting voices than you ever will vs. the Trump hysteria, but similar voices exist now and are going unheard. Heck, I can't even submit to Slashdot any more without getting bots marking me as "SPAM." If you go look at my submissions, you'll see this one got falsely marked as "SPAM" even though it's nothing of the sort. Slashdot published that exact story from someone else a day or so later.

      I've never had ANY story flagged as spam before that and I have quite a lot of published Slashdot submissions.