Slashdot Mirror


Wisconsin Company Will Let Employees Use Microchip Implants To Buy Snacks, Open Doors (theverge.com)

A Wisconsin company called Three Square Market will soon offer employees implantable chips to open doors, buy snacks, log in to computers, and use office equipment like copy machines. The chips use near field communication (NFC) technology and will be implanted between the thumb and forefinger of participating employees. According to The Verge, around 50 people are supposedly getting the optional implants. From the report: NFC chips are already used in a couple of workplaces in Europe; The Los Angeles Times reported on startup workspace Epicenter's chip program earlier this year. In the US, installing them is also a form of simple biohacking. They're essentially an extension of the chips you'd find in contactless smart cards or microchipped pets: passive devices that store very small amounts of information. A Swedish rail company also lets people use implants as a substitute for fare cards. 32M CEO Todd Westby is clearly trying to head off misunderstandings and paranoia by saying that they contain "no GPS tracking at all" -- because again, it's comparable to an office keycard here.

112 comments

  1. Enough Already! by nospam007 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This has been going on for roughly 5-10 years.
    Each and every time a company, a club a resort ...implements this, some dodo who has never heard of this, posts this here as 'news'.
    It's not.

    1. Re:Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when DHS implements this, you'll be shocked! shocked!

    2. Re:Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you post some references for companies that do this?

    3. Re:Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was microchipped during Obamma's Jade Helm

    4. Re:Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you shut the fuck up?

      Hugs and kisses,

      Juan Epstein

    5. Re:Enough Already! by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as it remains "will let" and does not transition to "will require", I have no problem with this.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    6. Re: Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not required, it's just that you'll be shunned and blackballed for rocking the boat in essence since there are plenty of team players we could hire that would love to save the company money and aggregate thier authority to a plantable tracking, error I mean passive, ya that's right, I mean passive, device.

    7. Re: Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will let all new hires be chipped for free, opting in at a later date due to technology updates and business policy changes will be at cost to the employee....

    8. Re:Enough Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it remains "will let" and does not transition to "will require", I have no problem with this.

      The whole point of "will let" is to make it more normal so that "will require" will be easier to do later.

    9. Re:Enough Already! by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of provisions in Finnish labor law that forbid a lot of "will let" scenarios, because the employer transforms them into "must", de facto. The leverage that employers have always ends up transforming these de jure "at will" provisions into mandatory ones.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  2. Creepy by oldgraybeard · · Score: 0

    What more can be said ;)

    1. Re:Creepy by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      And unnecessary. It sounds like a gimmick, but the implications aren't exactly encouraging.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Maybe not by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it's good to remind us of these Orwellian nightmare plots and schemes. IMHO this is an idiotic thing for anyone to do. Anytime it gets promoted people do, and should, push back.

    Burke "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

    Sure, this company may not be evil. Who else can use these chips though? Are you sure they are all going to be altruistic?

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Maybe not by stinerman · · Score: 2

      Sure, this company may not be evil. Who else can use these chips though? Are you sure they are all going to be altruistic?

      Certainly not. I have no idea what that has to do with anything. Technology can be good or bad depending on how it's used. I wouldn't get one of these, but if someone else wants to...sure, have at. I'm not going to stop you.

    2. Re:Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's good to remind us of these Orwellian nightmare plots and schemes.

      How is this under-skin device different from your fun, useful, GPS-tracking smartphone?

    3. Re:Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can turn of my smartphone, or leave it at home.

    4. Re:Maybe not by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Shooting at the wrong target. You should be MUCH more concerned about your phone turning into something that is your official ID/government profile and be forced to use it in all interactions so everyone is positively identified at all times.

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:Maybe not by anegg · · Score: 1

      RFID cards for toll booths started out as optional; now there are tolls that can only be paid using the RFID card (or, in some cases, a camera takes a picture of your license plate and you pay the toll plus a $3 surcharge for the "convenience").

      Could chip implants become required?

    6. Re: Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article gives more details how it's done...

      How and when to update microchip

    7. Re:Maybe not by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Except nobody is proposing that (so far). If politicians or corporations were pushing that, I would push back and be "MUCH" more concerned. I can only react to what happens though, not what "could" happen.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:Maybe not by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Are you really that naive?

    9. Re: Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! All we need to do is replace you with company and dog with you.... great guide!

    10. Re:Maybe not by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Could chip implants become required?

      Unlikely. Face, iris, and fingerprint recognition have improved so much that the chips are no longer necessary.

    11. Re:Maybe not by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Except nobody is proposing that (so far).

      Every single financial institution that I deal with requires this. If I want to transfer money, or use a new device to login, they require that I confirm with a passcode sent to my cellphone.

    12. Re:Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you are forced you own a smartphone.

    13. Re:Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some roads they were never optional. Highway 407 debuted in 1997 and never offered any other option than their transponder or paying exorbitant fees (on top of exorbitant tolls) for using a plate. Non-passenger vehicles have to have a transponder or "else", too (I have no idea what the penalty is, but the 407 has the power to stop renewal of your plates, so I assume they just take away your ability to drive).

    14. Re:Maybe not by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't. Change your financial institution if you are worried.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    15. Re:Maybe not by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't. Change your financial institution if you are worried.

      I'm not worried. I like the extra layer of security.

  4. Health Issues? by ELCouz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happen if health complications exist after implantation? Employer pay for that?

    1. Re:Health Issues? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      That's what Non Disclosure Agreements are for.

    2. Re:Health Issues? by ELCouz · · Score: 1

      I was hoping it was a joke but since it's US we are talking about.... NDA nowadays have more power than anything else and strictly enforced. Probably that's what will happen.

    3. Re:Health Issues? by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      Is removal covered/required when you leave the company?

    4. Re:Health Issues? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Standard implant required for all "citizens". (I hope I'm being sarcastic, but I'm afraid I might not be.)

  5. Nobody else needs to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many bags of Fritos I've purchased in the last six months.

    1. Re:Nobody else needs to know by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      LOL. Bacon!

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  6. Severance? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what happens when you're fired, quit, retire, or otherwise leave this company's employment? Surgery to remove the implant? Who pays for that?

    1. Re:Severance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's no need to remove it. It's a string of numbers contained in a NFC chip. The head office just disables the clearance associated with that string of numbers.

    2. Re:Severance? by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      So what happens when you're fired, quit, retire, or otherwise leave this company's employment? Surgery to remove the implant? Who pays for that?

      Probably not necessary. Each chip has a unique ID number. Simply delete that record from the access control file and your chip will no longer open any doors. It's the same way card entry systems typically work. That's one of their big advantages over physical keys.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:Severance? by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      Then you get another RFID tag for your next employer, and the reader has to try to read them both and check them both every time you want a pack of gum. Then you go to a fourth and a fifth employer, and your doctor is getting concerned about the amount of foreign material in the limited space in your hand.

      My company uses a badge for doors and the snack machine uses that and a PIN. The same thing can be done with the card number, and it doesn't stay with me for life.

    4. Re:Severance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the company will be happy, they can still track you....

    5. Re:Severance? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you're fired, quit, retire, or otherwise leave this company's employment? Surgery to remove the implant? Who pays for that?

      The same people that bust into houses and take credit cards back.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re:Severance? by dissy · · Score: 1

      That's not how either of those items work however.

      Then you get another RFID tag for your next employer, and the reader has to try to read them both and check them both every time you want a pack of gum. Then you go to a fourth and a fifth employer, and your doctor is getting concerned about the amount of foreign material in the limited space in your hand.

      No you just have the one single implant.
      The previous company removes your NFC ID from their systems, and the new company adds that NFC ID to theirs.

      My company uses a badge for doors and the snack machine uses that and a PIN. The same thing can be done with the card number, and it doesn't stay with me for life.

      Actually the badge ID system is used on the assumption that your badge WILL stay with you, or at least accounts for that possibility.

      Yes they ask that the badge be returned, simply because it cost up to $2 and can be reused.
      But the system doesn't assume it will be returned, and that's why the ID linked to the badge is disabled in their system when you leave, returned or not.

      It's always a possibility an employee simply stops showing up for work never to be seen again.
      The requirement to lock them out of the premises upon termination needs to be handled without physically requiring anything from the now ex-employee.

      Most employee handbooks that require signing contain some form of clause of what happens when a badge card, or any other company property for that matter, is not returned.
      Some don't care, some make you agree to pay a fine for the badge.

      There is also the situation of losing a badge ID, ranging from "I dunno where I left it" to "I got mugged last night"
      Those badges need disabled just the same since you have no idea who if anyone has possession of it now, and some companies stick their logo and name right on the thing making it brain dead simple to know where to attempt to use it.

      Our system even has separate flags on the badge ID for "Lost, Claimed" and "Lost, Destroyed"
      The second one is only to be set when HR or IT physically destroys a card themselves (Say it cracked or popped open, in this case you run it through the heavy duty shredder and flag it as destroyed)
      The "Lost, Claimed" option is when the employee claims it is lost but this is unconfirmed. It allows the card to be "unlost" and reissued in the future, while the destroyed option removes it from the list of available IDs.

      There is no reason an NFC system would need to work any different from an RFID system, other than accounting for the much longer unique ID field.

    7. Re:Severance? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No you just have the one single implant.
      The previous company removes your NFC ID from their systems, and the new company adds that NFC ID to theirs.

      That assumes they use the same tags, which is not a safe assumption.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Severance? by dissy · · Score: 1

      That assumes they use the same tags, which is not a safe assumption.

      Perhaps not a safe assumption between different companies, but at least purely going by the description given in this example I think it is a good assumption.

      Obviously one can use any non-standard protocol over NFC they wish, but there are ISO standards for this sort of thing that are inter-compatible.

      That is also the assumption smartphone makers use which mostly works out OK.
      NFC equipped phones can speak ISO standards, and any proprietary standards for payment/credit type processing (think apple pay)

      In this case they talk about using the same NFC tag over a wide range of readers and systems.
      If any one of those systems was proprietary, it wouldn't at all work with the other ones.
      It almost needs to be using an ISO standard just for the entire campus to work together, so it is very likely these implantable NFC chips are using an ISO standard.

      One of the other benefits to using ISO over NFC is that you can "offer" to employees the ability to use their smartphone as a badge, instead of actually issuing them a badge.
      From the user point of view, since a phone can be loaded up with a bunch of NFC IDs at once this can be easier than carrying a ton of badge cards.
      From an employer point of view, that's one less badge to issue and pay for.

      But over all you are correct. The next company you work for may be a smaller one that only has a single badge system, say just to open the doors for you.
      With only one system that doesn't have anything else to "play well together" with, there's nothing preventing them from going with a crappy brand or provider that uses a proprietary badge.
      It may not even be NFC but older RFID, which would be completely incompatible.

    9. Re:Severance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it is just a string of numbers, then I can copy it trivially by bumping into you in a bar. And you're going to secure your doors with it. Not the best plan. I mean, technically I can probably do that with your employee ID too, but if you're trying to be more secure than that then you use two-factor.

  7. Why not an invisible tatoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Injecting something under the skin seems a lot less temporary than a henna-type tattoo that you could (eventually) wash off.

    Why not formulate an RF sensitive ink? You could 'print' IDs like in all those post-Apocalypse Christian stories about marks of the beast. Bonuses if it looks like the company logo under black-light. It would be like cattle branding 2.0. Or a Neil Stephenson novel.

    1. Re:Why not an invisible tatoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother making them with invisible ink?
      The Germans were such innovators!
      http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2014/01/holocaust-tattoo.jpg

    2. Re:Why not an invisible tatoo? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Why not formulate an RF sensitive ink?

      R&D costs for such a thing aside, every NFC tag has a silicon chip that actually stores and calculates information. So unless you are looking to print an entire IC on someone's hand, it's kind of a no-go idea.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Why not an invisible tatoo? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      why not use a god damn thumb-print?

    4. Re:Why not an invisible tatoo? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Injecting something under the skin seems a lot less temporary than a henna-type tattoo that you could (eventually) wash off.

      I'm not all that worried about that aspect of it - we have been chipmarking pets and other animals for a long time, and we know it is very safe. It has a lot of advantages in terms of identification (although it is also potentially something that can be forged). Applications like finance and healthcare spring to mind, as well as personalising your mobile and other gadgets so they only work if the right person hold them. There's two questions, though: would people in general want ot be easily identifiable? And in order to really benefit from this sort of thing, we need a central register of all participants - who should manage this register?

      As a practical example, take Denmark, where they have had such a system for a very long time (not the implant, the register): the CPR (Central Person Register). The upside is that it is very easy for any doctor or hospital to find your complete health record, and the social services have access to the same system, so they can, in principle, provide the best possible help to each individual (although in practice it rarely work that well, not least because social services are always over-committed and under-funded). There are downsides as well: it is extremely easy for any creditor to find you, which means that creditors can be - and invariably are - very heavy-handed, because they don't feel they need to be nice. If debtors can disappear out of sight, the creditors will be more motivated to try to keep them on their side.

  8. Alright by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    It's comparable to an office keycard.

    Present:
    Most of us: alright then, we'll continue to use keycards instead.

    In the near future:
    Companies/governments: if you still use keycards you are terrorists.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  9. Who in their right mind!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who in their right mind would let their employer implant them with a microchip of any kind. or implant them with anything at all

    1. Re:Who in their right mind!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which company has company doctors to do implants for them?

      Worse, it's apparently a "break room solutions" company. Guess what? This is an alpha test of a potential product.

    2. Re:Who in their right mind!? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      This is future. You do not want it, I do not want it. But it will happen.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:Who in their right mind!? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Yep, idiots - that's who. Oh, and people who are so desperate for a job they can't get one anywhere else.

      Once enough of them have 'voluntarily' signed up, it'll become 'best practice' and 'commonplace' and so mandatory.

  10. Just read that somebody had a grocery app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grocery store application. On their lil Facephone gadget, or whatever.

    Yesterday, it was this baby-looking cartoon game that brought out like 20000 pedophiles to some massive lonely faggot gathering. What a disgusting world.

  11. Now available on the market, tinfoil gloves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to wrap your hand in tinfoil mittens to stop people from remotely stealing the code in your bio implanted chip.

  12. Owned by major prison vendor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://news.fastcompany.com/that-company-microchipping-its-employees-is-owned-by-a-major-prison-vendor-4044282

  13. Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They really need to have a way to turn these implants off.

    It's great opening a door without reaching for keys and stuff like that. It's not so great is if EVERY SINGLE device that can read RFID (from doors to ads) knows you've been near it and what you were doing - especially since we can be sure that data will be bundled and uploaded to marketers as well as the spooks.

    When people figure out it's not all wonderful, what then? More surgery to get it out?

  14. I am not a number. I am a free man! by BatesMethod · · Score: 1

    "I am not a number. I am a free man!"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW-bFGzNMXw

    Not news, indeed.

  15. Re:not needed by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    Three Square Market just got a lot of free advertising (for only the cost of injecting some garbage between the thumb and forefinger of some of their disposable employees).

    Well, maybe not all of that free advertising will bring complements though.

  16. Lower health insurance premiums by dlleigh · · Score: 2

    This will cut down on the company's health insurance premiums because the employees are no longer eligible for expensive MRIs.

    1. Re:Lower health insurance premiums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Google your paranoia before broadcasting it.

      http://www.mypetsdoctor.com/microchips-are-safe-during-magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri

    2. Re:Lower health insurance premiums by dlleigh · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good if you are a cat, with a low payout to the owner in case of an accident. Thank you for your veterinary reference.

      Whether implanted RFIDs are actually safe in MRI machines or not, human hospitals and imaging clinics are unlikely to take the risk and will send you for a CT instead. Perception of liability is more important than actual risk.

      Have you ever had an MRI? Did you read the lengthy questionnaire first, with all the inquiries about metal implants, having worked in a machine shop, etc.? Do you remember getting wanded with a metal detector? MRI safety is serious business.

    3. Re:Lower health insurance premiums by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Those aren't for safety, they're because metal blurs the image.

    4. Re:Lower health insurance premiums by dlleigh · · Score: 1

      Those are for both safety and because of concerns of blurring the image.

      Ferromagnetic materials can move under the the influence of a strong MRI magnetic, which is a safety concern.
      Any conductive material may cause local blurring of the resultant image. It is also possible that conductive materials can be heated by the process, which is a safety concern.

      If you come in for an MRI and they discover that you have some implant with no documentation on MRI compatibility, unless it's a grave emergency, they're going to send you off for a CT. But feel free to argue with them.

    5. Re:Lower health insurance premiums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a metal/plastic artificial hip joint, and I wondered what would happen if I needed an MRI. Actually, I would be happy to never, ever have one again. Had one once before the implant, and it was noisy, claustrophobic, and you can't move even to scratch an itch. And it was one of those "open" units, so called I'd say.

  17. Optional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are optional now, but in 5-10 years they will be mandatory. And "they" will track everything you do.

  18. What a Revelation! by labnet · · Score: 1

    This has been going on for roughly 5-10 years.
    Each and every time a company, a club a resort ...implements this, some dodo who has never heard of this, posts this here as 'news'.
    It's not.

    + no ones quoted the Bible yet.
    Revelation 13:16 (Remember, this was written 2000 years ago)
    It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.

    --
    46137
    1. Re:What a Revelation! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands

      Then the obvious solution to appease the Biblical literalists is to put the chips in the left hand.

    2. Re:What a Revelation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a start, nobody is actually being forced to do this, so it doesn't meet that criteria. Second, it is made-up nonsense.

    3. Re:What a Revelation! by gnick · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a similar passage - Just as applicable today as when it was written:

      Woe to you, oh Earth and sea, for the Devil sends the Beast with wrath
      Because he knows the time is short
      Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the Beast
      For it is a human number, its number is six hundred and sixty six

      ...
      Six six six the number of the Beast
      Six six six the one for you and me

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  19. Perfect way to target scam victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because only a idiot or a fear-laden authoritarian would let an employer do this

  20. This is for idiots only. You may qualify ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really is not newsworthy, as others have mentioned. Now, if a government intends to force citizens to have a chip implanted, THAT will be news.

    A revolution would follow shortly afterward, and THAT would be news.

  21. Why not a ring? by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    Why not just start using some simple, common piece of jewelry as a housing for the device? Most people are fairly good at avoiding losing them permanently, and they're easily replaceable if they're lost/stolen/compromised. Before getting into "slippery slopes" and other played out debates, doesn't it make something resembling sense to not make such a thing permanent? Do they have some massive overstock of pet chips to get rid of or something?

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Why not a ring? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is a prison supply company, they're not doing something evil to their employees, they're just testing the systems temporarily and getting discounts on snacks for their trouble.

      When they use it on prisoners it might be a big improvement, mostly because they don't have any privacy or freedom anyways, and the guards are often bad people. So increased automation is likely to be appreciated by the users.

  22. Implant? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    Jeez, just put it in a small ring I can wear. Why would you voluntarily implant something in your skin that you could just carry around?

  23. what about temps / contractors / etc that you don' by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about temps / contractors / etc that you don't have full control over.

  24. cards have site ID's / diffenter groups by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    cards have site ID's / different groups. In some systems you can't just add any card # range / other stuff that makes recusing them not that easy.

    1. Re:cards have site ID's / diffenter groups by dissy · · Score: 1

      RFID cards tend to heavily rely on having a site ID pre-programmed at the factory, but at least when it comes to the NFC ISO standard there is no site ID anymore, just a very long unique ID.

      This is the take that smartphones equipped with NFC hardware utilize, mainly for compatibility sake.
      I would very much hope the implantable NFC chips are also using this same standard.

      Obviously one can use any protocol over NFC including proprietary ones, and it seems some banking type cards do exactly that, but it seems in most of those cases you wouldn't even get compatibility with all of your own readers let alone anyone else.

      Since these people mention using it for more than a single task over their campus, I'd tend to believe them regarding using an NFC standard like ISO.
      It would be difficult if not close to impossible to accomplish otherwise.

  25. What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could place these RFID chips in something called a "company ID badge" and then we could attach them to a piece of jewelery. I don't know what we'd call it but "lanyard" sounds like a good word. You would think someone would have come up with this idea already in 2017

    1. Re:What a great idea by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I've heard that there's this container-y thing for such cards, I think it's called a "wallet". Supposedly, people already carry one around with them most of the time...?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  26. Depends on the Job by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's no need to remove it.

    That depends on what your next job is. If it involves working in an environment which may contain strong magnetic fields e.g. NMR/MRI, particle accelerators etc you need that thing removed. Also, depending on how paranoid airport security becomes, travelling with it in the future may be problematic.

    1. Re:Depends on the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry. For those sorts of jobs, it'll be removed for free on your first day.

  27. Implant this in my dick by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    And let it open the assholes of the CXXs who think this is a good idea.

    / not gay
    // not that there's anything wrong with that
    /// except sticking my dick in a dude's asshole gives me the heebeejeebees

  28. We've seen this before by deadcrow · · Score: 1

    "CEO Todd Westby is clearly trying to head off misunderstandings and paranoia by saying that they contain "no GPS tracking at all" -- because again, it's comparable to an office keycard here"
    This is the marketing spin coming from security companies or the government in hacker movies, books, and video games, where the hacker ties everything together and can trace anyone. Watchdogs for instance.

    --
    I'm just "this guy", you know?
  29. Wow, just.. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are people becoming so lazy that they can't log into their own computer, open their own door, push a button or two on a vending machine? Hasn't anyone else seen the movie I, Robot? The human capacity for stupidity will never cease to amaze me.

  30. Use a ring! by gti_guy · · Score: 1

    If you want RFID on your hand rather than a badge, what about using a ring instead? You just slip it on as you get ready for work and slip it off when you get home. Why doesn't anyone come up with this?

  31. LET'S ALL VOTE ON IT !!! by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    I completely approve of subcutaneous embedded RFID technology for authentication! Four automatic votes here! (raises both hands, each grasping two severed arms) BLIP. BLIP. BLIP. BLIP.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:LET'S ALL VOTE ON IT !!! by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

      raises both hands, each grasping two severed arms

      Each hand is one vote.
      If each hand grasps two severed arms, it is six votes altogether.
      Six is an even number.
      Six is an odd number of votes for a person to have.
      The only number both odd and even is infinity.
      Therefore, this person has an infinite number of votes.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  32. between thumb and forefinger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The motion sensor will tell when the hand gets very "Busy" in the bathroom during the work day.
    Productivity will go up, but morale will go down.

  33. I love my implant by gachunt · · Score: 1

    I've had an RFID implant chip in my hand for 4 years now, and love it.

    The doors on my house and garage door opener are all controlled by RFID, as are the doors and trunk on my vehicles. (I'm currently working on installing RFID locks/servos on the glove boxes and center console compartments)

    Beyond never getting locked out, it's just incredibly convenient, such as when I'm outside doing yard work, and need something from my garage, I don't have to enter my house, take off the dirty shoes/gloves, to open the garage to grab a shovel. Just wave the hand and the garage opens.

    I also hooked up my house safe to work on RFID. That was a fun conversation with my executor. "In the event of my death, you'll need to ask the mortician to dig the chip out of my hand, to open my safe."

    I realize it's not for everyone, but it has been wonderful, and I haven't regretted it. I have no desire to take over the world, or enslave the population and force chips to be implanted in everyone. I did ask my employer to register my chip's ID in their security system so I didn't need to wear their RFID badge, but they declined.

    1. Re:I love my implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also hooked up my house safe to work on RFID. That was a fun conversation with my executor. "In the event of my death, you'll need to ask the mortician to dig the chip out of my hand, to open my safe."

      Assuming there's anything left of your hand to dig the chip out of, and that the chip has survived whatever killed you. Don't imagine they work too well if exposed to fire.

      Of course if you just lose the hand in a horrible amputation accident -- or someone decides it's worth arranging an "accident" to get access to your stuff -- you're SOL.

    2. Re:I love my implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then someone figures out how to spoof your RFID tag and now you need to have the tag extracted from your hand.

  34. Why they're doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not just some random company where the boss thinks this is a good idea.

    The company, Three Square Market, is a vendor of self-service vending kiosks. They'd like this to become standard to promote their way of doing business. They're trying it out on their employees first. https://32market.com/public/

    It's also worth noting, and entirely unsurprising, that this company is part of the for-profit prison industry. See http://tkc32m.businesscatalyst.com/ and find that they're also this company: http://www.turnkeycorrections.com/

    Turnkey Corrections sells video-chatting for inmate visits. States are turning to stopping in-person visits in favor of for-profit video calls.

  35. Time to learn CRISPR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to learn CRISPR, so I can engineer a deadly virus to take out this company's owners and their families in perpetuity.

    A few other 1%er targets come to mind as ideal candidates (Putin, Trump, etc.).

    Airborn HIV+Ebola tailored to dickwads anyone?

  36. Hmmm by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    How long before this is used against the employees

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    1. Re:Hmmm by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Next open enrollment for benefits.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the price chart for the premiums/co-pays/deductibles going up as your fitness or activity level (as measured by the device) goes down.

  37. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wisconsin is largely known for dairy farming, and animal tracking. Why not humans too?

  38. Re:what about temps / contractors / etc that you d by dissy · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly sure our temp agency has contracts with their workers to return company property.
    But I work in IT, not in HR, so I'm not really sure how that all is handled.

    From my end of things, over a decade of working here I've only had two individuals come to me asking for replacement badges.
    In one case the badge was snapped in half nearly all the way through, although this was after 12+ years of use.
    In the other case the person lost their badge, and this was after a couple years of employment as well.

    In both cases I just issued new badges and deactivated the old ones.
    We didn't charge the employees anything. Seems a bit petty for an honest mistake over what is in essence a $2 badge we order 100 at a time of.

    If someone made a frequent habit of losing their card we might invoke the replacement fee clause, but it's never been an issue yet.

  39. Re:what about temps / contractors / etc that you d by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    well putting an implant into temps / contractors may be hard and the temp agency may really over change for an removal fee

  40. Re:what about temps / contractors / etc that you d by dissy · · Score: 1

    I was speaking of badge cards being issued, not implants.

    Generally companies in the US don't tend to define temps or contractors as employees, but I can't say if that's the case here.
    Neither the article nor the article in the article is too clear, but it does say "offering ALL employees"...

    Seeing as it only costs about $50 or less to have the same chip implanted in your cat or dog, even with the insane US healthcare prices it's not like the process is a huge investment of money.

    Either way though, the solution is no different than for employees not wanting an implant.
    Just issue them a NFC badge like before.

  41. Re:what about temps / contractors / etc that you d by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    not like the process is a huge investment of money. but if the temp place has to change X2-X3 the temps hour rate for the doctor visit time to remove it + maybe an fee to make up for lose of use of the temp that could be on a different job.

  42. I am a cow to be tracked and I want my tattoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should I get it on my forehead or arm? Which place would be the most convenient for the convenience I am conveniently getting? Quality measured by subjective quantity. First World problems: Don't count your blessings, count your conveniences. Remember, KJV says the mark is "in," not "on." Moo you plebs! The boss won't be getting one.

  43. Re:what about temps / contractors / etc that you d by dissy · · Score: 1

    That's exactly why I said a temp worker shouldn't consider this an option, even if the current company was paying for the implant.

    As for removal, and this applies to anyone thinking about getting one of these, one should keep in mind installation is much simpler all around than removal is.

    Installation is fast (~15 minutes), being injected under the skin by a tool looking like a novelty sized needle, done under local anesthetic at a doctors office.

    Removal would require cutting the skin open, and then stitches or an equivalent, along with the proper after care to prevent infections.
    I guess it could be done under local anesthetic. That's how guys get their tubes tied after all, which IMHO is far more horrible to think about...

    Basically it would be FAR better to think of this as a one-way trip for the chip: in, not to come out again.

    If you aren't squeamish, you can do a google image search on "rfid chip implanting"
    *shiver*

  44. Mark of the beast blah blah blah Orwell yada yada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that's out of the way, this is degrading and completly unessecary.
    A removable wrist band or an old fashioned RFID card on a lanyard works just fine, and anyone who can't properly handle those items is probaly too stupid to live.

  45. The anti-antifa have taken over slashdot. by AdamBiggs6860 · · Score: 1

    So we're normalizing this now. This is sick. The company will let them. Every worker doesn't see it as a choice. There is no other option if any human doesn't want to play the wealth game. The relationship is not one of equality. The reward is not distributed equally. But, slashdots new evil overlords choose to frame the discussion as though the 'option' is not horrifically misguided.