Amazon Jacked Up Prime Day Prices, Misleading Consumers, Says Vendor (foxbusiness.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: A Charlotte-based startup says e-commerce king Amazon jacked up their suggested retail price during the company's annual discount event -- Prime Day -- to deceive consumers into thinking that they were getting a deal, when in reality, they weren't. Jason Jacobs, founder of Remodeez, a small company that specializes in non-toxic foot deodorizers and other odor stoppers, says he had an agreement with Amazon since 2015 on a suggested retail price of $9.99 for his products and was shocked after the tech giant almost doubled that on Prime Day to make it look like people were getting a discount, when they were actually paying full price. "They showed the product at $15.42 and then exed it out to put '$9.99 for Amazon Prime Day.' And on the final day, the price was like $18.44. So, we put a support ticket in right away and I rallied some friends through social media to go to their complaint board and complain," Jacobs tells FOX Business.
Amazon ran their retail business at a loss for years in order to gain market dominance. We always knew the day would come when they'd use their immense power to start extracting higher profits out of their customer base. That day has arrived. And, don't think for one minute that they won't do the same with AWS if they ever achieve the same level of dominance. (Giving us all a rare reason to root for Microsoft.)
Company that sells stuff engages in shady behavior to maximize profits.
An internal system operation returned the error "The operation completed successfully.".
Amazon is no longer reliably cheaper than some brick and mortar options. I have run into this trend more and more in the last couple years.
It's already known that amazon have dynamic pricing - it's not a stretch to assume that mechanism could be used for shady reasons.
At risk of sounding like a cheesy advertisement: That's why I use camel camel camel!
For those who don't know; it tells you the price history of any product on amazon - so you can see if they've hiked the prices before putting it on sale or just in general if the price is lower or higher than normal.
I needed a USB drive yesterday and when I went online to get one I noticed Amazon said that since I had a Prime account it was eligible for free same day delivery. On top of that their price was about $15 less than the local retail. (This was a 5TB Seagate, now in service backing stuff up).
So I ordered, scheduled for delivery in the afternoon, and it came and I thought pretty amazing.
What I didn't notice until later is that although there was no shipping charge there was a $12 tip for the driver ordered by default. Even had I noticed I don't pull tips from working guys/gals so the end result is that the "free" shipping cost me more than had I just gone with Amazon's regular next day free shipping.
Caveat emptor and all that. I am all for regulated free market capitalism and I don't think Bezos/Amazon is evil but it is sort of ironic that real the effect (whether it was the intent or not) of AP delivery was to get me to pay the low-end worker directly for work that Amazon now doesn't have to pay for.
And that's all I have to say about that.
Don't use either one. There are plenty of great smaller vps cloud providers. My infrastructure is split between digitalocean, linode and vultur for fault tollerance. I can drop one in a second if they have packetloss, downtime or increase prices too high.
Website Just Down For Me? Find out
You guys seem to think that this is bad. I was in BestBuy the other day to buy a new keyboard and mouse. I decided to look up reviews while i was standing there and noticed that the price on the BestBuy website beat the one in the store for the keyboard by $30, the mouse by $15, and the mouse pad I was also grabbing by $5. I HAD TO ASK THEM TO PRICE MATCH THEIR OWN DAMN WEBSITE!
There are many, many other defects in Amazon management. Every web page, for example, tries to sell you something else before giving full information about a product.
Playing games with prices is EXTREMELY self-destructive. People buy much more from companies they know they can trust. When a company can't be trusted, customers must spend time thinking carefully about every item before buying.
Amazon abuses employees, according to news reports:
Inside Amazon: Wrestling Big Ideas in a Bruising Workplace (Aug. 15, 2015)
Worse than Wal-Mart: Amazon's sick brutality and secret history of ruthlessly intimidating workers (Feb. 23, 2014)
Amazon Under Fire Over Alleged Worker Abuse in Germany (February 19, 2013)
Jeff Bezos, the CEO of Amazon, owns a spaceflight company, Blue Origin. Would you fly into space with a company whose owner makes abusive web pages?
Any manufacturer of sufficient size should be able to put up a web-based order portal where end consumers can buy their products. All they need is fulfillment. The maker of a product should easily be able to undercut any price offered by a retailer. In the past, they never did that because distribution was extremely difficult. This is no longer the case. Wholesale pricing. Distributor pricing. Retail pricing. Bugger all that! Make your product, accurately determine your costs and sell it directly to consumers for 10% more. Charge for shipping. Don't be fooled, shipping is never free. It may be included in the price so it's somewhat hidden, but it's never free.
Granted, Amazon does fulfillment extremely well. But all you (as a manufacturer) has to do is ship your stuff. Give reasonable delivery times (5 - 7 business days, for example) and people will buy it. Save lots of money or get the product tomorrow? People will almost always choose to save $$.
Cutting out the middle man has never been easier.
Disclaimer: Not talking about this particular case.
Many of the comments talk about "shady" practices. What many here are failing to understand is that if it's not illegal, it's legal, and businesses are going to do it in order to maximize profits. It's the rare case when they won't act that way...typically when there's concern about some sort of bad press that could affect the bottom line. But in general, if we don't want businesses doing things we consider shady, they need be made illegal, or regulated...especially when it becomes monopolistic.
And FWIW, I'm saying this as a conservative, small government fan.
Just another day in Paradise
There are a ton more reasons manufacturers dont want to sell directly to the public. Source, I work for a manufacturer.
1. Invoicing - invoices don't reconcile themselves automatically.
2. Logistics - all these one-off deliveries don't package and label themselves.
3. Returns - these things require a ton of manual intervention to process, rectify and account for.
4. Partner Relationships - Many existing distribution contracts have clauses to prevent direct to consumer sales. Even if they dont have such a clause in place you are risking damaging a relationship with your redistributors which could have huge impacts to your business (see reasons 1-3).
5. It takes capitol, resources and focus to run an efficient direct to consumer fulfillment center. Most manufacturers would rather (and smartly so) focus on making quality products and leave all the other business stuff to large distributors and re-sellers.
Have a good day!