Slashdot Mirror


Charter Has Moved Millions of Customers To New -- And Often Higher -- Pricing (arstechnica.com)

After Charter closed the acquisitions of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks in May 2016, it moved 30 percent of the customers it acquired onto new pricing plans, resulting in many people paying higher prices. "Before the merger, Charter had about 6.8 million customers; afterward, Charter had 25.4 million customers in 41 states and became the second-largest U.S. cable company after Comcast," reports Ars Technica. From the report: Charter came up with new prices and packages, and many customers saw their bills rise when their previous discounts expired and they were switched to non-promotional pricing. Now, 30 percent of the ex-TWC and ex-Bright House customers are paying different -- and often higher -- prices. Charter CEO Thomas Rutledge provided the update in an earnings call last week (hat tip to FierceCable). According to a Seeking Alpha transcript, Rutledge said: "In June, we finished the rollout of our new pricing, packaging, and branding across our national footprint with the last launch of Spectrum in Hawaii. We now offer a simple, straightforward, high-value product using a consistent and uniform approach across our 50 million passings under one brand, Spectrum. The new product is succeeding with consumers across our footprint. In the second quarter, our customers and PSU [primary service unit] connects were higher year-over-year. And as of the end of the second quarter, 30 percent of Time Warner Cable and Bright House legacy customers were in our new pricing and packaging, up from 17 percent at the end of last quarter. In areas where we've had Spectrum in place for at least three quarters, 43 percent of our residential customers have Spectrum package products."

13 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Degradation of the U.S. culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    U.S. companies seem to be competing with each other to be more and more abusive.

    1. Re:Degradation of the U.S. culture. by darkain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about internet access? Which other companies are available within these monopoly markets for them to switch to? And considering that basic internet access is a requirement for job applications nowadays, there is no serious way to simply "live without"

    2. Re:Degradation of the U.S. culture. by Sparowl · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure "competing" is not something they are interested in - hence the merging of companies.

  2. That's crazy talk by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Funny

    everybody knows mergers increase innovation which lowers pricing while improving service. Charter told me so before they merged.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  3. Wellll, this is a wee bit misleading... by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Charter came up with new prices and packages, and many customers saw their bills rise when their previous discounts expired and they were switched to non-promotional pricing.

    Clearly, the nature of cable conglomerates is chaotic evil, but it seems likely on the order of tomorrow's sunrise the same customers would've been subjected to rate increases at their original cable providers when their promotional discounts expired.

    We're talking about an industry where the only sure method of getting discount rates involves switching providers. No one gets great rates staying with their current provider.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Wellll, this is a wee bit misleading... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> the nature of cable conglomerates is chaotic evil

      It's lawful evil. As in:

      Step 1: change the law to be evil
      Step 2: be evil, but within the constraints of the new law
      Step 3: PRRRROFFFFIT!

    2. Re:Wellll, this is a wee bit misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The story itself is misleading. I wasn't in any promotional period and I saw my pricing raise by 40%. Even worse, when I called to find out the reason for it, I was on hold for 3 hours then gave up. Never called back. I just pay a shitton more and there's really nothing I can do about it since there isn't any other providers.

  4. deja vu by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Charter came up with new prices and packages, and many customers saw their bills rise when their previous discounts expired

    So, just like Comcast, then.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  5. Why the outrage? by Nutria · · Score: 2

    many customers saw their bills rise when their previous discounts expired and they were switched to non-promotional pricing.

    FFS, the whole point of promotional discounts is that your bill increases when the period is up!

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  6. The Invisible Hand by Sparowl · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Invisible Hand of the market clearly lead to this. People must've been paying too little for the services provided, so the market has self corrected and brought everyone in line. If Charter is charging too much, then people will move to a competing product, right?

    What? There is no competition? Impossible. Everyone knows that the market encourages competition and companies to work for the good of the people, not to collude in order to increase their own bottom line.

    Barriers to entry? Listen, son, if you want to get ahead in the world, you need to pull yourself up by your boot straps, overcome the paid for barriers that other ISPs have put in place, and create a multi-million dollar infrastructure by hand. Go ahead, all you need is guts and determination!

    (rides away on piles of money) AMERICAN DREAM!

    1. Re:The Invisible Hand by rogoshen1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Business logic:

      Government acting in the interest of consumers: "That's anti-competitive, anti-freemarket. A free market is what made this country great."
      Government acting in the interest of business: *crickets* ... "A free market is what made this country great, and we're job creators. We're simply acting on our fiduciary duty to maximize value for our share-holders"

      The double talk coming from these types is positively awe inspiring. On one hand decrying government intervention while simultaneously engaging in every conceivable manner of rent-seeking.

  7. And requiring cable boxes by EzInKy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.wdrb.com/story/3605...


    There was a steady stream of traffic going into and out of the Spectrum cable office in St. Matthews Thursday afternoon. Sekou Davis had his arms full of electronic equipment, including a phone modem and a DVR box. He was turning it all in, and cutting the cord after more than 20 years with cable.

    “For one, the cost of the service, and, two, just the quality,” said Davis.

    Davis says Spectrum's latest change is the last straw. The company is encrypting, or scrambling, its signal in Louisville. It means customers must now have cable boxes for every TV set. They can no long plug cable-ready TV sets directly into a cable outlet.

    To be fair, the boxes will be free, at least for a while.


    Spectrum is offering customers two free boxes for two years, and five free years for customers on Medicaid. After that, it will cost $5.99 a month for each box.

    Well isn't that generous of them.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  8. destroying the competition by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Merging is done to destroy competition where regulatory constraints prevent easy entry into a business. Municipalities are often the guilty party on preventing internet and cable competition - e.g. "can't cross our right of way", etc.