Slashdot Mirror


Hollywood's Bad Summer Movies Are Driving a Decline in Movie Ticket Sales (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: While some people may point at The Emoji Movie as the root of all that is wrong with Hollywood, The Wall Street Journal reports that the problem goes much deeper than a single misfire featuring Patrick Stewart as a poop emoji. WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales. On Aug. 2, AMC shares dropped 27% in one day, the WSJ reports. While films like Beauty and the Beast, Wonder Woman, and Get Out fared well at the box office, they were the anomalies in a year full of box office disappointments. Instead of giving moviegoers more badass female leads and genre-bending horror films, Hollywood keeps throwing gobs of money at an unwanted fifth installment of Pirates of the Caribbean, more Transformers movies, and putting $175 million into King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, and then clutching their pearls in shock that no one wanted to see them.

35 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Speaking just for me by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me. Before the movie I see nothing but politics from the actors, telling me how awful a person I am. During the movie it's an endless barrage of extremism masked as social justice.

    Making things worse, they want me to "enjoy" this in a shitty movie theater surrounded by loud people that can't put their cellphones away. All for the low low price of 15 bucks a person not including the 25 bucks in terrible food.

    Pretty rare these days too that a movie isn't a sequel or prequel or sidequel in some "franchise" that sucked from the start but brought in a lot of teenagers so the stiffs in suits thought it would make sense to throw billions of dollars at it.

    I jokingly said to my wife the other night that there wasn't even anything I wanted to pirate anymore, it's just gotten that bad.

    1. Re:Speaking just for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore.

      Translation: "I can't believe Star Wars cast a woman in a leading role and didn't show off her tiddies."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Speaking just for me by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one said you had to watch all the Transformer movies.

    3. Re:Speaking just for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the unrealistically scrawny and weak female lead carrying a black dongstaff riding a speeder that looks like a dildo with the young black buck love interest adventure in their fight against the evil straight white man and being followed around by a small white cuck-bot the white male viewer is supposed to identify as while the hispanic fighter ace saves the day after being commanded to go in by the asian general and the only guy that dies is also a white male. convenient.

      You watched Star Wars and that's what you came away with?

      You might have bigger problems than the SJWs, my friend.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might have bigger problems than the SJWs, my friend.

      Yes, like a lack of titties in movies.

    5. Re:Speaking just for me by x0ra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's be honest, the only reason of Carry Fisher's success was the bikini scene RofJ, not the depth of the Princess Leia.

    6. Re:Speaking just for me by x0ra · · Score: 2

      which balance out the 95% SJW on HN.

    7. Re:Speaking just for me by sexconker · · Score: 2

      You do have to watch Transformers - The Movie, however.
      It's the only good one and it came out 30 years ago.

      It's got an incredible voice cast, from an era when no established actor would touch an animated film with a 10 foot clown pole.
      Not only do you get the iconic Peter Cullen and Frank Welker, you also get the likes of Casey Kasem, Eric Idle, Judd Nelson, Leonard Nimoy, and Robert Stack. You even get Scatman Crothers and one of the final performances from Orson Welles.

      Then you've got the sound track that was so amazing the entire movie was story boarded to it. You even get a song from Weird Al Yankovic.

    8. Re:Speaking just for me by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me

      That's your problem, I suggest seeing a therapist about these kinds of paranoid delusions. Your white privilege is as safe as it ever was. Hollywood only has one dogma, that is to make money. The problem Hollywood has is that movies are no longer the only game in town. I'm not just talking about TV and Netflix, video games are now a significant form of entertainment amongst most people. Hollywood for so many decades never had any competition, they were able to keep a stranglehold on the production and distribution of the majority of entertainment, the internet has largely ruined this for them with games and streaming services taking over the production and piracy dealing with the distribution. Hollywood has simply not changed with new technologies. They're still stuck in the 80's when we had no other choice but to buy their crap (and I remember the 80's... they made some shit movies).

      I jokingly said to my wife the other night that there wasn't even anything I wanted to pirate anymore, it's just gotten that bad.

      Could she hear you from the kitchen, or was this when you put her shoes back in the drawer.

      Your problem isn't the imaginary "dogmas", your problem is they aren't pandering to you, ironically its because you're even further behind the times than Hollywood.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Speaking just for me by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's be honest, the only reason of Carry Fisher's success was the bikini scene RofJ, not the depth of the Princess Leia.

      So was Mark Hamill's success a result of his brilliant acting or did he have a shirtless scene I forgot about?

      Let's be honest, Carry Fisher and Mark Hamill were both decent performers who achieved fame beyond their talent because they were well cast in a massively successful movie.

      To insist that Carry Fisher's success was only because of her bikini scene is the definition of sexism.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    10. Re:Speaking just for me by oic0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you politicize your content, you alienate half the population no matter which direction you lean. Nothing new there. Hollywood seems to have forgotten this because they think California is the world.

  2. Sequels and remakes by hambone142 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I couldn't believe they did another "Flatliners".

    When we watched the previews a few weeks ago we saw this as well as 4 (yes, FOUR) remakes of previous movies.

    Hollywood deserves to go broke if this is all they can come up with.

    If I see another comic book movie, I'm gonna puke.

    1. Re:Sequels and remakes by grumling · · Score: 2

      It's a side effect of all the studios being publicly held companies. They become completely risk adverse to anything that doesn't look like what worked the last time. Restaurants, retail shops, banks, airlines are all selling the same product in the same way because "the shareholders" (mostly institutional investors, the only ones who get an audience with the CEO) don't know anything about the business, other than what company X's earnings statement looked like last quarter, and so if you want the fund manager to buy your stock you'd better do what he wants. And once they own enough stock to move the chart negatively they get to define the product too. Usually the product is "do what that other, more successful company does, but for a buck cheaper. Or we'll run you out of the executive suite faster than you can say Transformers IX."

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:Sequels and remakes by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      If you want to get the whole picture, you need to pay attention to how it does in international sales. Pirates of the Caribbean made $$173 million in the US, but it made $781 million worldwide. Which market do you think they are going to pay the most attention to? The US is just one small market now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. Not all movies by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Emoji Movie may be all that's wrong with Hollywood, but Baby Driver and Dunkirk are what is right with it.

    1. Re:Not all movies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem I had with Dunkirk, especially with buildup in the earlier trailers, I was expecting an English monster movie. I lost interest when it became clear that it was just another war movie.

  4. Re:Nothing new under the sun by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're just getting way past the saturation point with entertainment and stories of every kind. We need a break, and then afterward we can go back to telling and hearing the same old tales again, just as our ancestors have done for millennia. Maybe we could even do something useful for a while. I have even been thinking about cutting the cord on my Netflix subscription... ...and I'm not any kind of anti-TV nutter.

    When did our ancestors take a "break" from telling stories?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Small wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    " WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, "

    If I want to see teenies checking their smartphone I just take a look on the sidewalk, no need to go to a movie theater.

  6. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think anyone is staying away from the Emoji movie because of an evil leftist agenda. They're staying away because it sucks, and because streaming services like Netflix and Amazon can provide better entertainment at a lot better price.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. but bad movies won't get the blame by arbiter1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hollywood will blame Piracy as reason for weak ticket sales and why we need more tougher law's.

  8. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I did not intend to say they did. We need the break, because of our modern luxuries and capabilities which allow us to overload ourselves with media. Our ancestors were naturally limited by lack of time and technology for such things. Though at times (e.g. Roman), they may have come close.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  9. Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are still too many white males in prominent roles in movies. Movie revenue will increase once all white males are cast in unimportant or comedy relief roles then phased out entirely. Hollywood must boycott white males if they want to succeed.

  10. No originality .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The heavy left-wing political slant most Hollywood stars and writers want to impart on films isn't helping sales either. But IMO, the lack of movies worth the price of admission to see is the biggest issue.

    I actually enjoy going to the theater to see a movie sometimes. I'm not much of a sports person so I don't go to see games. A good movie is an excuse to get out of the house with the family and to buy bragging rights that we saw a newly released film long before it comes out on video. All the complaints about unruly crowds and teens using their phones through entire movies? I've encountered a bit of that, but it's more the exception than the rule - at least at the theaters I go to.

    But the movie has to be worth seeing! With so many sequels and remakes, there's not a whole lot left! Anything in one of those categories is best rented and watched at home, IMO. Some of the remakes are mildly amusing or entertaining, but practically never rise to the level of justifying buying a group of adult movie tickets at over $11 each, plus popcorn or sodas or what-not at hugely inflated theater prices.

    I think the superhero movies from Marvel and DC have done so well because there were so many good stories to tell there. We have many decades of comic books being printed that were all but ignored on the big screen until now. Even so? You've still got Hollywood trying to milk some of the best known ones (Spiderman, Batman and Superman) with regular re-releases of films about them, sometimes rehashing the same basic story different ways. It feels like the producers and directors are making these more for themselves than for the audience?

    But sometimes you've just had enough of seeing yet another superhero movie, too. Then what? The Fast and the Furious movies started out as ideal summer action/fantasy films - but by this last one? It just went over the top on stretching your belief. "I'll just push this torpedo that's flying here and change its direction." Come on! A good car movie needs to have scenes that at least make some attempt at being plausible.

    And some will disagree, but I feel like the "horror movie" genre was all played out by some time in the 1990's, if not earlier. 90% of them are pretty much formula material, aimed at an audience young enough to not have watched a lot of the older stuff first. Nobody else would find much of it worthwhile at all. And again, any of the true classics they came up with got rehashed with SO many sequels it became a farce. (Anyone up for another Chucky movie? Or hey, maybe we could redo the Exorcist one more time?)

    Personally, I'm into sci-fi more than most genres, and Hollywood manages to do a decent job with that occasionally. But not often. And worse yet? When they promise a lot but get it all wrong, they alienate people who you managed to drag along who weren't really into sci-fi but resigned to give it a chance. How many times will they try again when future sci-fi movies come out?

    I was just telling a friend of mine earlier today ..... as much as we all loved "Office Space", I think I'm glad they didn't try to do a sequel. I mean, it's another obvious cash grab for Hollywood if they did. But it would probably be awful. I think you could do it right, at least for one more movie. But you'd need to tell a whole new story about a different company, with a whole new cast of interesting characters. And for comic relief, re-insert a couple of the originals. Maybe Lumbergh finds a new job as a middle manager at the new company, since crappy middle managers always seem to manage to keep getting re-hired at places in real life. I think instead, they'd screw it all up trying to tell some stupid story about how all the characters find themselves doing the same kind of work at a new place.

  11. Well... by Yunzil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hollywood keeps throwing gobs of money at an unwanted fifth installment of Pirates of the Caribbean, more Transformers movies, and putting $175 million into King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, and then clutching their pearls in shock that no one wanted to see them.

    Pirates of the Caribbean 5
    Production budget: $230,000000
    Worldwide gross: $781,537,470

    Transformers 5
    Production budget: $217,000,000
    Worldwide gross: $586,549,576

    Somebody, somewhere wanted to see them, which is why Hollywood keeps making them.

  12. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who invented emojis? Millennials. Who invented millennials? Leftists. Checkmate, Martian.

    I bet you aren't even from Mars.

  13. I saw Dunkirk last week by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Got there when the show was about to start. Spent a good 10 minutes watching nothing but ads. Then the previews. I hate previews, they tend to give away the major plot points, or show funny stuff that doesn't show up in the movie. Some 30 minutes after the movie was supposed to start it started.

    I snuck in a bottle of water and some trail mix

    Great move, bad experience.

    / snuck in - they were in my pockets, pretty obvious to anyone who cared
    // $4 for $0.33 worth of popcorn? Ok, I don't have a microwave in your theater. But still..
    /// $5 for sweetened ice tea, when I prefer mine unsweetened? Remind me again why I never see movies in theaters.

  14. Hmmm. by Bartles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales.

    If you raise prices and revenue decreases, it means that prices are too high. There's a simple fix to their problem.

    1. Re:Hmmm. by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      I like the phrase the summary threw in about "badass female leads and genre bending horror"....as if lack of those was the problem. Now don't get me wrong, bad-ass female leads kicking ass makes me hard, and horror story that is well done is fun too....but a good story can have any and all kinds of characters, even an old WASP millionaire

  15. It's China by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ticket sales are down in the US because the movies are geared to the Chinese market. They're less desirable (weaker dialog so it's easier to dub, watered down plots to make it through Chinese censors) but folks still go see them, they just don't keep going again and again. Profits in the States are down but that's dwarfed by the profits in the US.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. "TFA" is basically a fan-made trailer for real TFA by denzacar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Real TFA doesn't even mention emojis OR "more badass female leads and genre-bending horror films".
    All that was injected into discourse by the "writer" of that blogpost masquerading as TFA.

    Cause... clickbait.

    Basically, it boils down to more expensive tickets...
    A summer without a real mega-blockbuster cause all the slots were taken by expensive non-starters or franchises which have overextended their welcome and overpaid for the production...
    And talk about earlier streaming options making distributors nervous. Very nervous.
    Also... Chinese investors. But mostly it's about streaming.

    No agendas.
    Nor is it about genre-bending horrors and chicks who punch people.
    It's about distributors riding their favorite geldings along the road - when a strange mechanical contraption suddenly roared passed them, leaving them and their animals shaken and scared in a cloud of dust and exhaust fumes.
    And then a different machine FLEW over them! GASP!
    Is this the end of the horse industry as we know it?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  17. TV Screen Size and Quality by DumbSwede · · Score: 3, Informative

    This seems no surprise to me. Movie experience is essentially a constant. TVs keep getting better and bigger. I find little difference these days watching movies at home. In fact until we've had a 10 foot projection screen in our media room since 2008. I had a tri-beam data-grade projector back in 2000 that I powered with a myHD card. I haven't cared that much about seeing things in the theater since the introduction of Blu-Ray. With shows like Game of Thrones you essentially get a movie fix once a week minimum anyway. Here is the main thing. Learn to delay gratification. Once your watching everything 6 months delayed, your watching the same amount of content and basically the same amount of enjoyment for a lot lower cost point (which helps pay for your kick-ass media room).

  18. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny, I didn't realize a 45-year old Japanese engineer working for NTT DoCoMo is considered a millennial...

  19. Valerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here was a non-Hollywood movie that got killed in the reviews. The first half had no faults, was kick-ass, and to me was worth the price of the ticket. And you know why many people didn't like it? Because it did not fit the superhero mold that people still seem to love. Face it, Hollywood gives you what sells tickets.

  20. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Evtim · · Score: 2

    And at the very root the issue is that the beancounters run the whole industry these days. The process began in the 70ties but then it was the cheesemakers who just bought the studios and by mistake did a good thing - gave opportunities to young directors to experiment a bit a make movies for young people. Thus we got all those directors considered icons of the second half of 20th century.
    But some of those innovative movies flopped on release while becoming all time classic (e.g. Blade runner).
    Today the marketeers won't take any risks with such lavish budgets. No experiments, no original vision. Research says there are still enough people to buy Fsat and Furious 675 so that's what we will do.
    But maybe audience is getting wiser and seeing that TV shows have way bigger balls than big movies the interest is shifting.
    See also all the complaints about the theater going experience....

  21. misfire by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > The Wall Street Journal reports that the problem goes much deeper than a single misfire

    Please allow me to interrupt here -- Ya think??

    It couldn't possibly be that Hollywood is substituting eye candy and big set pieces for an actual story that works? That they've completely underestimated how much the public, yea, even that unwashed billy-bob public that is supposed to only be interested in naked breasts and explosions, might want a compelling story that makes sense? (And maybe, since you brought it up, that nobody really thought a poop emoji voiced by Patrick Stewart was funny?)

    Nah. It must be them damned downloaders.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.