Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Makes Safety Check a Permanent Feature (techcrunch.com)
Facebook announced today that its "Safety Check" feature will be permanent in its app and on the desktop. The feature lets you check to see whether friends and family are safe following a crisis. TechCrunch reports: The change comes following new terrorist attacks, including one in Barcelona, where a vehicle was driven into a crowd, as well as the attack in Charlottesville, here in the U.S. According to Facebook, the dedicated button is gradually rolling out to users starting today, and will complete over the upcoming weeks. That means you may not see the option right away, but likely will soon. When Safety Check is accessed by way of the new button, you'll be able to view a feed of disasters, updates from friends who marked themselves as safe and offers of help. An "around the world" section will display where Safety Check has been recently enabled, too.
... but fear itself.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Wow. I had no idea just how deeply social media's infection had reached into people's lives. People carry around "disaster alerts" in their pockets now? They expect their friends and family to actively mark themselves as "safe"? I can't fathom what it must be like to live such a life of fear.
No it's not. A very small group misrepresenting a religion does not mean you go rounding up everyone of that religion. Do you want to round up all Christians because of the KKK or Neo-nazis? Or some of the contemporary Christian terrorism groups?
It's people like you that should be rounded up because you help spread the hatred and give these groups another justification for their fight. They point at you and say that all Westerners hate Muslims. And when you make statements like that you make the Muslims that are here, and an important part of our society, feel disenfranchised. That's why they are leaving. You are pushing them away.
Wrong. Muslims declared war on the rest of the world centuries ago.
Scaremongering is also a great diversionary tactic.
The "war on terrr" saved how many lives?
How many lives would a war on tobacco producers–significant contributors to the top three causes of death–have saved?
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black... If you think the Ottoman Empire was a major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire then you really need to go re-read your history books or stay away from those "alternate facts" because at most the Ottoman Empire took advantage of the fall of the Roman empire to establish itself.
"Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
/:
"where a vehicle was driven into a crowd"
Swedish media:
"a vehicle drove through a crowd."
Or vehicles don't have drivers. They are simply vehicles driving over people. (and only racists think it's terrorists attacks committed by Muslims and even if they are it haven't got anything to do with Islam. And that only make sense, because where in the Quran and Hadiths may you find any example whatsoever of hatred of non-Muslims, orders to fight enemies of Islam and capital punishment for breaking its laws?!)
Why should they be distinct from other religions in that sense? Especially the Abrahamic religions, such as Christianity and Judaism, where righteous genocide is key to the oldest stories? I'm specifically mentioning the willingness of Abraham to slaughter his son for his god, the world flood of Noah, the slaughter of Jewish infants by the Egyptians and the slaughter of every first-born Egyptian child by the Jewish god, the slaughter of the Canaanites by Jews upon reaching the "Promised Land". It goes on to more modern, verifiable epics Abrahamic religious genocide in the Middle Ages, especially the Crusades against the Muslim controlled countries around Jerusalem. The African, pantheistic religious are hardly immune from this, nor are the faiths of Asia.
Muslim peoples and nations have declared war at various times. So have _many_ other nations, and faiths.
Yes, but use them intelligently. Just dropping them somewhere isn't going to accomplish anything.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Pretty much any religion contains some sort of justification for Lebensraum. Our people need more room, and the heathens have it, so club their heads in. Deus vult!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Hey, the justification is even older than that, given the age of the holy scriptures they draw their justification from, a mere millennium is kinda recent.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
'Do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you.'
A dangerous proposition in a world that is obviously full of masochists.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Yes, and in the end it was rightfully called "The Sick man of Europe. With the only debatable portion thereof being the "Europe" but certainly not the sick part. It was a shadow of its former self. It had nothing of the vitality and threat that it was to Europe a mere 300 years earlier when it conquered half of Europe before being stopped by the Polish king at the gates of Vienna.
A service Austria repaid about a 100 years later by dividing up what was left of Poland between it, Prussia and Russia, but let's not engage in negligible petty sentiments like thankfulness. In international politics? Pfff, get real.
Any empire, in history, had a birth, a high time, a decline and a demise. Every single one. Some went down faster, some lasted longer, but none lasted forever. The Egyptians, the Hittites, Romans, Franks, Russians, Spaniards, English and now the US... Empires came and went.
It is quite easy to topple an empire in the end. The end of the Roman empire came when it needed to staff its legions with more and more foreign soldiers, to the point where the Romans didn't do any work at all anymore and pretty much relied on slaves and foreign soldiers to defend their way of life. That was pretty much the death spell of the empire. Which lasted longer in the East, actually, but even that had an expiration date. Yes, the Ottoman Empire eventually conquered the last bits of it, Constantinople itself, but that was already at the point where it didn't really take that much to fell it anymore. That was more pulling the plug on a patient on life support rather than assassination of a capable fighter.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The feature made perfect sense when it was first used for large-scale disaster, e.g. tsunamis affecting the majority of people in a given area. Nowadays, I'm flooded with alerts about some guy who ran around with a knife, as if there's any chance that the people I know in the same city were affected.
Now that they're making it permanent, maybe they'll finally implement a setting to turn the whole thing off.
I'm not too convinced this will be useful, especially for casual facebook users. that are actually safe during a crisis but fail to mark themselves as "safe" with this feature. Say there is a crisis in your location, and you're using this to see who's OK in your friend list. 75/100 friends are safe. Phew. What about the other 25? Or even if it's only 8/10 that you really care about. Are they dead because they didn't check in? Or maybe they just forgot their phone that day. As this feature becomes more ubiquitous on facebook, it will increase the worry factor for those not on facebook enough to use it via "false negatives".
Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
I don't do Facebook. That's even safer.
Yes, this was the important part of the posting. Good job. It's up there with pointing out a missing apostrophe.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.