Slashdot Mirror


We Can't Stop Checking the News Either. Welcome to the New FOMO (wired.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: Countless studies have shown that social-driven FOMO (fear of missing out) stems from a person's primitive desire to belong to a group, with each snap, tweet, or post a reminder of what separates you from them. This other type of FOMO, the all-news, all-the-time kind, is new enough that nobody has really studied it much, yet of the half-dozen experts in sociology, anthropology, economics, and neurology I spoke to, all quickly recognized what I was describing, and some even admitted to feeling it themselves. "We scroll through our Twitter feeds, not seeking anything specific, just monitoring them so we don't miss out on anything important," says Shyam Sundar, a communications researcher at Pennsylvania State University. This impulse could stem from the chemical hits our brains receive with each news hit, but it could also derive from a primitive behavioral instinct -- surveillance gratification-seeking, or the urge that drove our cave-dwelling ancestors to poke their heads out and check for predators. In times of perceived crisis, our brains cry out for information to help us survive. Maybe this alarm stems from steady hits of @realDonaldTrump. Maybe it's triggered by left-wing Resistance types. Or could it be #FakeNews, ISIS, guns, police violence, or street crime, all propagated through our social media bubbles with headlines that are written specifically to grab our attention? This feels like a processing problem. "One thing we learn about human beings: We're meaning-making machines," Kross says. And social mania may be ideal for mainlining breaking news, but it's not great at providing meaning and context.

27 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. So...useless people do this, then? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> "We scroll through our Twitter feeds, not seeking anything specific, just monitoring them so we don't miss out on anything important," says Shyam Sundar, a communications researcher

    Seems like multiple levels of fail are in play here.

    1. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who is this "we".

      People with friends. So most Slashdotters are not affected.

    2. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by gnick · · Score: 2

      I certainly don't scroll through anything unless I am looking for something specific.

      FB users often scroll endlessly through their front page. Some content gets repeated eventually. A lot doesn't. Some people can't handle that there might be something at the "end of the page" that they just had to see.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      The above is the appropriate response. When most of what you learn from the TV doesn't affect you, and you can't affect it, you might as well have a pint.

      all-news, all-the-time

      That is not what it is. News is, by definition, something novel. It is revelation. It is not re-re-re-re-re-analysis, nor is it replaying the same bloody 10-second video on a loop for 48 hours straight. (Looking at you specifically, CNN, though every single "news" network is guilty of this.)

      There is plenty of news in the world daily. Yet we are treated to a infinitesimal portion of it repeated over and over and discussed to death.

      FOMO is not about consuming the news. It is about trying to sift through tonnes of horseshit to find those few nuggets of actual news that is reported.

      One of the best things I ever did for myself was to give up chasing the tail of the incessant information flow. I can pursue information on those topics that are important to me, and know that the truly massive topics will come to me through others, regardless.

  2. I have the opposite by halivar · · Score: 2

    I have a deep, intense fear that I will fail to miss out on the news. This fear is usually validated by the weekly shitstorm on my FB feed. Also, when /. posts "current events" articles.

    1. Re:I have the opposite by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I once made a comment to a co-worker about Trump's latest idiotic outburst, just assuming she was already aware of it. She had no idea what I was referring to. Then she explained to me that she didn't read any news, and had stopped paying attention to current events decades ago. She said that the result was less stress, and more time to spend on the important things in her life. As far as she could tell there were no negative consequences, since nothing in the news had anything to do with her life.

    2. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see you have very little to do except but continue dividing people into two groups.

      You're part of the problem that people are trying to escape. DIAF.

    3. Re:I have the opposite by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm moving in that direction. I've stopped looking at news sites and mostly stopped listening to news on the radio (other than the 5 min summary on my drive home). I originally had a fear of becoming 'uninformed' on the days current events, but honestly that hasn't happened. I hear enough to keep abreast, but don't dive into the latest outrage de jour and I've never been happier.

    4. Re:I have the opposite by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 2

      >>Then I realized that most chatter about current events is uninformed

      That's actually a good point.

    5. Re:I have the opposite by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      since nothing in the news had anything to do with her life.

      Trump has nothing to do with her life? Did she even vote, did she even know about the election or who the candidates were?

      Democracy only works properly if you have an engaged, informed electorate. If you don't, shit like Trump and Brexit happens, and I hate to use the N word but if it gets really bad you end up with 1930s Germany.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:I have the opposite by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Trump has nothing to do with her life?

      Correct. Trump has actually done very little, and none of it makes a practical difference in the the lives of most citizens.

      Democracy only works properly if you have an engaged, informed electorate.

      Can you cite any evidence to support this? Is higher voter turnout really associated with "better outcomes" is some objective way? I doubt it.

      you end up with 1930s Germany.

      Voter turnout in the 1933 German election was 96%.

  3. n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist psot! by ebyrob · · Score: 2

    Seriously though, this is definitely only going to exist in certain circles. I shudder to identify them properly but I see them in the elevator constantly when they can't pull their nose out of their phone between floors.

  4. Re:n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist pso by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Funny

    We used to call these people AOL subscribers.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  5. Puff, Puff, Pass the Bullshit. by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This impulse could stem from the chemical hits our brains receive with each news hit..."

    Uh, news? That's a laugh. The only thing being passed around these days is bullshit, which the masses obviously love to puff, puff, pass.

    "In times of perceived crisis, our brains cry out for information to help us survive."

    Those of us still armed with brains and common sense are crying, because its become increasingly frustrating to find a needle of useful information in a haystack world full of bullshit.

  6. Self organizing primates by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article is stumbling on to something that goes far beyond the latest news cycle. We're a tribal species, and until somewhat recently our survival depended on forming cohesive bonds with like minded individuals. In the past, that was our tribe; we would cleave to the opinion of the group in an effort to ensure our survival.

    Those of you with a sharp eye might notice this leaves little room for independent thought or free will. You aren't wrong.

    In modern times those behaviors still exist, but they're expressed differently. As our communication technology has advanced it has allowed us to form these tribal bonds with people who are otherwise physically distant, but because of the distance we do not get the constant feedback we'd otherwise get from an in-person association. The end result is an almost obsessive need to stalk friends and family online.

    You'll note, danger doesn't really enter into it except as an amorphous "force" driving the need for socialization.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Self organizing primates by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      I didn't get the part about trying to be a part of a group; when they got to the part about information, that made sense. I often hover around people when they have information, and then lose interest when I can't learn anything more by hanging near them.

      Group cohesion has never really driven me. An intense distrust in my own understanding of things has. It's not a good way to make friends--I'm often dismissive of peoples's limited understanding (especially on things like economics) because I recognize a past version of myself that believed the same things and was wrong, and people kind of want you to agree with them and stop thinking.

      One day, someone is going to go Preston Brooks on me for asking a question nobody wanted asked.

  7. I don't really have anything to add by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

    I was just dropping by to check for new stories.

  8. I'm an info junkie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

    Mostly I dig for science and tech news, the bleeding edge of human knowledge and engineering stuff (except I'm looking at the pop science reporting, not the actual research / studies).

    I've learned to put it all aside for most of my day and relax. It's way too easy to waste your time looking for the next bit of interesting information and never find it.

    The truth is that nothing (that I can do anything about) is going to happen on a time scale of days. If I read about something tomorrow even in a week... the delay is not going to affect my life, I'm not actually missing out on anything.

  9. I gave up by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually gave up on watching or checking the news every five minutes when it went from 'These are the important things you must know!' to 'Here's what you should be outraged about today!'. I don't need to be told what I should or shouldn't be angry/disappointed/worried about, I'm a big boy and I'll make up my own mind on that. I just want to be told what's happening in the most neutral way possible, but that's not possible anymore it seems so I gave up. I'll listen to local news for a the highlights, but that's about it.

    1. Re:I gave up by eepok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly how I feel, now. If there's a news article or headline that uses any kind of suggestive emotional descriptor, I turn off.

      "Shameful Statements from the President. Critics Respond." -- Newsflash: "Critics criticize!"
      "Horrific Accident on the Freeway..." -- Yep. Happens literally every single day of the year.
      "Person Stuns Other People" -- I don't care about the emotional responses of other people. Shocked, offended-- doesn't matter. Just tell me what the person did/said.
      "Sad Tale of Person Who Feels Bad Now" -- Ok... but what led to the feels?

      If you just trim it down to the necessary, journalistic info, you find that most of these articles or TV segments should be 20% their presented length. Just tell me what happened! I'll know figure out my own thoughts, opinions, and feelings on the matter!

      I'm not kidding when I say that I would happily pay $30/month for a news service that committed to leaving all that crap out and just reported like the following.

      Headline: "President Does This Action", Body: On , President did this. These countries have acted in support. These countries are filing official protests. Here's the legal/historical basis for this action (link).

      Headline: "Business Hypeman Unveils Design for Thing", Body: On , Business Hypeman revealed the design for a Thing. The thing is not functional yet. Business Hypeman says when released it will do that. Here's the basis for the technology (link).

      Headline: "Law Proposed to Change How This is Done", Body: On , a legislature put forth a bill to make this process standard. Supporters include these guys. Detractors include these guys. Lobbyists involved from these industries have taken sides. Here's the legislation (link) and an analysis from an unbiased source (link).

  10. Turn off, tune out, chillax by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife & I went camping this past weekend in southern Illinois to view the eclipse. The location where we were at had no service on our phones. No Facebook, no news, etc. I get the same thing in the area where I go hunting. It's actually very refreshing. I highly recommend it.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  11. I have no opinion by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I wanted to post anyway.

  12. Every morning by lgordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First thing in the morning, every morning.

    1. Did he start a nuclear war?
    2. Did he resign?
    3. Brush teeth.

  13. I check the news regularly by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mostly in hopes that NK has launched nukes and I can just not bother to go in to work today.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  14. Haha what? by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    Checking the news obsessively just leads to a greater obsession with doing same.

    There's nothing wrong with having someone else tell you if there's something important.... And with all these people afraid of missing out there must be tons of people who are aware of the media's particular perspective!

    I used to check Slashdot obsessively but then found myself stuck in a loop of doing just that, and didn't realize how much of it was pure obsession and not actual benefit/fun in any way until I stepped away. And it was actually getting me worked up, I would get too involved in conversations, and too anxious about bad news and everything terrible about the world, without being able to even do anything about it because I was busy refreshing pages.

    Remember pre-internet (or at least pre-AOL and pre-Google)? Life was still fun, maybe more fun...

  15. Missing something "important" on Twitter... by PJ6 · · Score: 2

    *EYEROLL*

    1. Re:Missing something "important" on Twitter... by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      This!

      What has ever come across Twitter that was actually important? Is Charlie Sheen finally WINNING?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise